Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 5T
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| LG V30 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 425 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.32
| OnePlus 5T AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01 | Sony Xperia XZ1 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50 | Google Pixel 2 XL P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6.00 | LG V30 OLED, 2880x1440, 6.00 | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.20 | OnePlus 5 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -23% | -47% | -16% | -61% | 20% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 425 | 620 46% | 656 54% | 415 -2% | 432 2% | 560 32% | 426 0% |
| Brightness | 423 | 610 44% | 634 50% | 420 -1% | 428 1% | 562 33% | 431 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 93 1% | 93 1% | 87 -5% | 87 -5% | 93 1% | 93 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.79 | 0.4 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 4.2 -100% | 5.3 -152% | 2.7 -29% | 4.18 -99% | 1.7 19% | 1.6 24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.4 | 5.8 -71% | 7.8 -129% | 4.3 -26% | 8.53 -151% | 3.4 -0% | 4.1 -21% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 3.9 -56% | 5.2 -108% | 3.3 -32% | 5.3 -112% | 1.6 36% | 1.7 32% |
| Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.02 109% | 2.22 99% | 2.36 93% | 2.33 94% | 2.13 103% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6455 101% | 7086 92% | 7905 82% | 6787 96% | 7487 87% | 6435 101% | 6329 103% |
| Contrast | 785 | 1640 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | ||||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 242.7 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus 5T | Sony Xperia XZ1 | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | Google Pixel 2 XL | LG V30 | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | OnePlus 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -4% | -43% | 5% | -25% | -6% | 1% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 699 | 679 -3% | 287.4 -59% | 760 9% | 669 -4% | 788 13% | 748 7% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 203.4 | 204.4 0% | 205.3 1% | 195.3 -4% | 193.2 -5% | 194.2 -5% | 201.5 -1% |
| Random Read 4KB | 138.1 | 156.6 13% | 68.6 -50% | 170.6 24% | 78.2 -43% | 127.2 -8% | 141 2% |
| Random Write 4KB | 20 | 14.93 -25% | 7.59 -62% | 17.84 -11% | 10.21 -49% | 15.27 -24% | 19.3 -3% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 65.5 ? | 86.9 ? | 62.8 | 71.1 ? | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 47.71 ? | 66.5 ? | 47.2 | 57.2 ? |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
OnePlus 5T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.02 / 0.2 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.58 / 1.44 / 1.53 Watt |
| Carga |
3.17 / 8.54 Watt |
    
| |
| OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ1 2700 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL 3300 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -46% | -36% | -38% | -2% | 4% | -28% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.58 | 0.51 12% | 0.84 -45% | 1.28 -121% | 0.72 -24% | 0.68 -17% | 0.73 -26% |
| Idle Average * | 1.44 | 2.16 -50% | 2.31 -60% | 1.87 -30% | 1.37 5% | 1.13 22% | 1.44 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.53 | 2.23 -46% | 2.33 -52% | 1.89 -24% | 1.41 8% | 1.16 24% | 1.5 2% |
| Load Average * | 3.17 | 7.45 -135% | 4.76 -50% | 3.73 -18% | 3.46 -9% | 4.69 -48% | 6.91 -118% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.54 | 9.28 -9% | 6.39 25% | 8.08 5% | 7.83 8% | 5.24 39% | 8.51 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ1 2700 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL 3300 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -21% | -7% | -5% | 6% | -2% | -17% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1754 | 1612 -8% | 1665 -5% | 1706 -3% | 1914 9% | 1565 -11% | 1534 -13% |
| H.264 | 799 | 580 -27% | 698 -13% | 672 -16% | 822 3% | 742 -7% | 623 -22% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 718 | 601 -16% | 562 -22% | 581 -19% | 774 8% | 736 3% | 518 -28% |
| Load | 257 | 172 -33% | 286 11% | 302 18% | 267 4% | 275 7% | 247 -4% |
Pro
Contra
O OnePlus 5T é um ótimo smartphone para gastadores inteligentes: Um bom preço, baixo consumo de energia e uma ótima relação preço-desempenho. O OnePlus 5T é atualmente um dos smartphones mais rápidos disponíveis que também oferece uma bateria muito durável, bons alto-falantes e ótimas câmeras. Os telefones carros-chefe dos grandes fabricantes ainda oferecem câmeras ligeiramente melhores, por exemplo, nossa unidade de teste não possui um estabilizador de imagem ótico. As velocidades LTE do OnePlus 5T também não são tão rápidas quanto as de outros smartphones, mas você quase nunca notará isso. O software não ocupa muito espaço e é bem cuidado pelo fabricante. O smartphone deve ter recepção em qualquer lugar do mundo e as velocidades de Wi-Fi são muito boas. O GPS é preciso, o exato sensor de digitais e o reconhecimento facial são um plus agradável e útil.
O dispositivo possui um dispositivo de armazenamento rápido que oferece generosos 128 GB - isso, no entanto, não pode ser expandido por um cartão microSD. Manipulação confortável, uma tela nítida com cores fortes e temperaturas aceitáveis completam o OnePlus 5T. Mesmo os amantes do antecessor podem querer pensar em uma atualização: Ele lhe trará um alto-falante ligeiramente melhor, melhores câmeras e uma bateria significativamente mais duradoura. E, claro, um design moderno com marcos finos.
O fabricante conseguiu criar um excelente smartphone de gama alta quase sem desvantagem alguma e corrigindo algumas deficiências do antecessor. Longas durações de bateria, alto desempenho do sistema, boas câmeras e um som forte fazem deste smartphone uma boa compra.
Embora o OnePlus 5T não tenha marcos tão finos ou seja tão fácil de usar como o Galaxy S8+, o OnePlus 5T é um excelente desenvolvimento do seu antecessor, que até agora conseguiu permanecer livre afirmações falsas (ao contrário do OnePlus 5 quando foi lançado). Então, definitivamente podemos afirmar: O assassino de carros-chefe está de volta!
OnePlus 5T
-
01/03/2018 v6(old)
Florian Wimmer
Pricecompare
