Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/09/2018

Selfie, Selfie. "Duas câmeras traseiras? isto é tão 2017!" O mais recente smartphone de gama média Xperia XA2 Ultra da Sony apresenta uma câmara dupla virada para a frente para melhorar a qualidade das selfies. Vamos descobrir se isso foi ou não uma jogada inteligente, vamos?

Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Xperia Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 508
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 367 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 4, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 21 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB Typ C, USB-OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/​900/​1,800/​1,900), UMTS (850/​900/​1,900/​2,100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.5 x 163 x 80
Bateria
14.63 Wh, 3580 mAh Lítio-Ion, QuickCharge 3.0
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 23 MPix f/2.0, 24mm, 1/2.3” Exmor RS, ISO12800
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix Câmera dupla: 16MP OIS (1/2.6" ExmorRS) + 8MP 120° super (1/4" Exmor R)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante virado para baixo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, headset, AVG Protection, Sketch, AR Effekt, Movie Creator, 24 Meses Garantia, bandwidth (download/​upload): 600Mbps/​150Mbps (LTE); SAR: 0.41W/​kg (head), 1.12W/​kg (body); FM radio, fanless
peso
221 g, Suprimento de energia: 54 g
Preço
449 Euro

 

Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
size comparison OnePlus 5T - Xperia XA2 Ultra

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB eMMC Flash
656 MBit/s ∼100% +96%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
386 MBit/s ∼59% +16%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
334 MBit/s ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼43% -16%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
200 MBit/s ∼30% -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=270)
196 MBit/s ∼30% -41%
Maze Alpha X
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
82.8 MBit/s ∼13% -75%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 MBit/s ∼100% +113%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB eMMC Flash
585 MBit/s ∼90% +92%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
269 MBit/s ∼41% -12%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
223 MBit/s ∼34% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=270)
191 MBit/s ∼29% -37%
Maze Alpha X
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
95.1 MBit/s ∼15% -69%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - lake
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - lake
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - loop
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - loop
GPS Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra - overview
GPS Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra - overview
GPS Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra - lake
GPS Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra - lake
GPS Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra - loop
GPS Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra - loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
716
cd/m²
686
cd/m²
652
cd/m²
729
cd/m²
659
cd/m²
669
cd/m²
711
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
659
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 729 cd/m² Médio: 680 cd/m² Minimum: 5.91 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 659 cd/m²
Contraste: 1177:1 (Preto: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.18
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
IPS, 1920x1080, 6
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Honor View 10
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 5.6
OnePlus 5T
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01
Maze Alpha X
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Screen
-2%
10%
-25%
4%
-125%
Brightness middle
659
472
-28%
530
-20%
541
-18%
425
-36%
497
-25%
Brightness
680
430
-37%
523
-23%
538
-21%
423
-38%
478
-30%
Brightness Distribution
88
87
-1%
88
0%
96
9%
92
5%
87
-1%
Black Level *
0.56
0.27
52%
0.35
37%
0.6
-7%
Contrast
1177
1748
49%
1514
29%
828
-30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.8
3.5
-25%
2.4
14%
5.8
-107%
2.1
25%
11.6
-314%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.5
5.9
9%
5.5
15%
3.4
48%
22.1
-240%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3
4
-33%
2.2
27%
2.7
10%
2.5
17%
13.5
-350%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.29 96%
2.25 98%
2.07 106%
2.32 95%
2.93 75%
CCT
6938 94%
7048 92%
6598 99%
6570 99%
6455 101%
9955 65%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1479 Hz ≤ 5 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1479 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 5 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1479 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8801 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
70141 Points ∼40%
Honor View 10
173653 Points ∼100% +148%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
83284 Points ∼48% +19%
OnePlus 5T
172124 Points ∼99% +145%
Maze Alpha X
63989 Points ∼37% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=11)
68333 Points ∼39% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 232931, n=359)
72132 Points ∼42% +3%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
5051 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
7046 Points ∼100% +39%
Honor View 10
6724 Points ∼95% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5214 Points ∼74% +3%
OnePlus 5T
6595 Points ∼94% +31%
Maze Alpha X
3795 Points ∼54% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4636 - 5085, n=11)
4876 Points ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 8601, n=226)
4431 Points ∼63% -12%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
5083 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
8169 Points ∼98% +61%
Honor View 10
8306 Points ∼100% +63%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5916 Points ∼71% +16%
OnePlus 5T
7739 Points ∼93% +52%
Maze Alpha X
4562 Points ∼55% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5083 - 6264, n=11)
5679 Points ∼68% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (4147 - 10571, n=389)
4739 Points ∼57% -7%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
912 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
1264 Points ∼95% +39%
Honor View 10
1184 Points ∼89% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1195 Points ∼90% +31%
OnePlus 5T
1329 Points ∼100% +46%
Maze Alpha X
924 Points ∼70% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (666 - 936, n=11)
857 Points ∼64% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=466)
678 Points ∼51% -26%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1492 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
5936 Points ∼97% +298%
Honor View 10
3892 Points ∼64% +161%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1331 Points ∼22% -11%
OnePlus 5T
6100 Points ∼100% +309%
Maze Alpha X
1122 Points ∼18% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1470 - 1523, n=11)
1501 Points ∼25% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15875, n=466)
1622 Points ∼27% +9%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1325 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
3544 Points ∼83% +167%
Honor View 10
4276 Points ∼100% +223%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
2275 Points ∼53% +72%
OnePlus 5T
3845 Points ∼90% +190%
Maze Alpha X
1294 Points ∼30% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (838 - 1405, n=11)
1215 Points ∼28% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=466)
1157 Points ∼27% -13%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
3287 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
5822 Points ∼99% +77%
Honor View 10
5195 Points ∼88% +58%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4358 Points ∼74% +33%
OnePlus 5T
5872 Points ∼100% +79%
Maze Alpha X
3064 Points ∼52% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1763 - 3319, n=11)
3133 Points ∼53% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=466)
2351 Points ∼40% -28%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1560 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
3527 Points ∼96% +126%
Honor View 10
3181 Points ∼86% +104%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1993 Points ∼54% +28%
OnePlus 5T
3678 Points ∼100% +136%
Maze Alpha X
1424 Points ∼39% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1152 - 1570, n=11)
1483 Points ∼40% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=470)
1178 Points ∼32% -24%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
3738 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
7750 Points ∼86% +107%
Honor View 10
9015 Points ∼100% +141%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3680 Points ∼41% -2%
OnePlus 5T
8000 Points ∼89% +114%
Maze Alpha X
2726 Points ∼30% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2910 - 3956, n=10)
3713 Points ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14417, n=164)
4116 Points ∼46% +10%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
4234 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
6649 Points ∼98% +57%
Honor View 10
6785 Points ∼100% +60%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4431 Points ∼65% +5%
OnePlus 5T
6670 Points ∼98% +58%
Maze Alpha X
3795 Points ∼56% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (883 - 4234, n=11)
3691 Points ∼54% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 11598, n=214)
4120 Points ∼61% -3%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
865 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
1943 Points ∼99% +125%
Honor View 10
1918 Points ∼98% +122%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1526 Points ∼78% +76%
OnePlus 5T
1962 Points ∼100% +127%
Maze Alpha X
833 Points ∼42% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (710 - 4210, n=11)
1155 Points ∼59% +34%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=215)
1215 Points ∼62% +40%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1706 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
2956 Points ∼96% +73%
Honor View 10
2931 Points ∼96% +72%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1950 Points ∼64% +14%
OnePlus 5T
3068 Points ∼100% +80%
Maze Alpha X
1700 Points ∼55% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1631 - 1822, n=11)
1740 Points ∼57% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 3669, n=319)
1572 Points ∼51% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
727 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
4034 Points ∼100% +455%
Honor View 10
2994 Points ∼74% +312%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
618 Points ∼15% -15%
OnePlus 5T
4016 Points ∼100% +452%
Maze Alpha X
598 Points ∼15% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (707 - 729, n=11)
718 Points ∼18% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5220, n=319)
1103 Points ∼27% +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
833 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
3732 Points ∼99% +348%
Honor View 10
2980 Points ∼79% +258%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
729 Points ∼19% -12%
OnePlus 5T
3758 Points ∼100% +351%
Maze Alpha X
699 Points ∼19% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (811 - 839, n=11)
826 Points ∼22% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=327)
1054 Points ∼28% +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1698 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
2547 Points ∼84% +50%
Honor View 10
1906 Points ∼63% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1946 Points ∼64% +15%
OnePlus 5T
3031 Points ∼100% +79%
Maze Alpha X
1725 Points ∼57% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1698 - 1816, n=11)
1751 Points ∼58% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 3642, n=350)
1471 Points ∼49% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1256 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
5599 Points ∼97% +346%
Honor View 10
1954 Points ∼34% +56%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
879 Points ∼15% -30%
OnePlus 5T
5791 Points ∼100% +361%
Maze Alpha X
928 Points ∼16% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1234 - 1289, n=11)
1259 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (104 - 8312, n=350)
1499 Points ∼26% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1333 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
4422 Points ∼92% +232%
Honor View 10
1943 Points ∼40% +46%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1001 Points ∼21% -25%
OnePlus 5T
4816 Points ∼100% +261%
Maze Alpha X
1034 Points ∼21% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1318 - 1374, n=11)
1342 Points ∼28% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (127 - 6378, n=358)
1279 Points ∼27% -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
13054 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
21337 Points ∼100% +63%
Honor View 10
14556 Points ∼68% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
13306 Points ∼62% +2%
OnePlus 5T
21348 Points ∼100% +64%
Maze Alpha X
15189 Points ∼71% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (12667 - 13217, n=11)
12999 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7103 - 36762, n=505)
12408 Points ∼58% -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
18528 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
57134 Points ∼98% +208%
Honor View 10
22429 Points ∼39% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15262 Points ∼26% -18%
OnePlus 5T
58097 Points ∼100% +214%
Maze Alpha X
13708 Points ∼24% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (16508 - 18572, n=11)
18284 Points ∼31% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 160199, n=505)
16687 Points ∼29% -10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
16949 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
41618 Points ∼99% +146%
Honor View 10
20022 Points ∼48% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
14779 Points ∼35% -13%
OnePlus 5T
42022 Points ∼100% +148%
Maze Alpha X
14012 Points ∼33% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (15466 - 17030, n=11)
16767 Points ∼40% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=506)
14150 Points ∼34% -17%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
29 fps ∼23%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
102 fps ∼82% +252%
Honor View 10
125 fps ∼100% +331%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
34 fps ∼27% +17%
OnePlus 5T
113 fps ∼90% +290%
Maze Alpha X
24 fps ∼19% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=11)
29.7 fps ∼24% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=530)
29.1 fps ∼23% 0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
31 fps ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
60 fps ∼100% +94%
Honor View 10
59 fps ∼98% +90%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
31 fps ∼52% 0%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼100% +94%
Maze Alpha X
21 fps ∼35% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (28 - 31, n=11)
29.5 fps ∼49% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=533)
24 fps ∼40% -23%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
14 fps ∼21%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
49 fps ∼74% +250%
Honor View 10
66 fps ∼100% +371%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
16 fps ∼24% +14%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼91% +329%
Maze Alpha X
11 fps ∼17% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (14 - 14, n=11)
14 fps ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 115, n=452)
15.5 fps ∼23% +11%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
15 fps ∼27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
45 fps ∼82% +200%
Honor View 10
55 fps ∼100% +267%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15 fps ∼27% 0%
OnePlus 5T
53 fps ∼96% +253%
Maze Alpha X
9.5 fps ∼17% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 15, n=11)
14 fps ∼25% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=455)
15.2 fps ∼28% +1%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
5.2 fps ∼13%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
34 fps ∼83% +554%
Honor View 10
21 fps ∼51% +304%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.9 fps ∼24% +90%
OnePlus 5T
41 fps ∼100% +688%
Maze Alpha X
3.7 fps ∼9% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=11)
9.34 fps ∼23% +80%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 69.3, n=317)
13.3 fps ∼32% +156%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
11 fps ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
34 fps ∼92% +209%
Honor View 10
36 fps ∼97% +227%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.6 fps ∼26% -13%
OnePlus 5T
37 fps ∼100% +236%
Maze Alpha X
6 fps ∼16% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=11)
9.48 fps ∼26% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=319)
13.2 fps ∼36% +20%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
5.5 fps ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
24 fps ∼96% +336%
Honor View 10
21 fps ∼84% +282%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
6 fps ∼24% +9%
OnePlus 5T
25 fps ∼100% +355%
Maze Alpha X
4.1 fps ∼16% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=11)
5.5 fps ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 40, n=248)
9.16 fps ∼37% +67%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
6 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
23 fps ∼100% +283%
Honor View 10
21 fps ∼91% +250%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5.8 fps ∼25% -3%
OnePlus 5T
23 fps ∼100% +283%
Maze Alpha X
3.6 fps ∼16% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 6, n=11)
5.59 fps ∼24% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 50, n=251)
8.35 fps ∼36% +39%
AnTuTu v7
MEM (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
5875 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
8830 Points ∼98% +50%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
6040 Points ∼67% +3%
OnePlus 5T
9027 Points ∼100% +54%
Maze Alpha X
4808 Points ∼53% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5341 - 6574, n=9)
5989 Points ∼66% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2797 - 17441, n=138)
6490 Points ∼72% +10%
UX (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
23713 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
42180 Points ∼91% +78%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
32150 Points ∼69% +36%
OnePlus 5T
46549 Points ∼100% +96%
Maze Alpha X
20935 Points ∼45% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (22684 - 25223, n=9)
23921 Points ∼51% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (6403 - 66469, n=137)
26644 Points ∼57% +12%
GPU (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
19927 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
83213 Points ∼97% +318%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
25640 Points ∼30% +29%
OnePlus 5T
85868 Points ∼100% +331%
Maze Alpha X
18218 Points ∼21% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (19680 - 19927, n=9)
19803 Points ∼23% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3116 - 148790, n=138)
32577 Points ∼38% +63%
CPU (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
39834 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
70234 Points ∼96% +76%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
52916 Points ∼72% +33%
OnePlus 5T
73371 Points ∼100% +84%
Maze Alpha X
29861 Points ∼41% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (39348 - 39972, n=9)
39728 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7548 - 120510, n=138)
43157 Points ∼59% +8%
Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
89349 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
204457 Points ∼95% +129%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
116746 Points ∼54% +31%
OnePlus 5T
214815 Points ∼100% +140%
Maze Alpha X
73822 Points ∼34% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=9)
89441 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=138)
109082 Points ∼51% +22%

Legend

 
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor View 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Maze Alpha X Mediatek Helio P25, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
66.477 Points ∼100% +137%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
49.07 Points ∼74% +75%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=387)
35.1 Points ∼53% +25%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)
34.871 Points ∼52% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=11)
28.3 Points ∼43% +1%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)
28.107 Points ∼42%
Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64)
27.463 Points ∼41% -2%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
12509 Points ∼100% +148%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53)
10122 Points ∼81% +100%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
9350 Points ∼75% +85%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)
6729 Points ∼54% +33%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=523)
5237 Points ∼42% +4%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)
5052 Points ∼40%
Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64)
4990 Points ∼40% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=11)
4968 Points ∼40% -2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=542)
11780 ms * ∼100% -20%
Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64)
10244 ms * ∼87% -4%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)
9823.3 ms * ∼83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10236, n=11)
9642 ms * ∼82% +2%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)
6013 ms * ∼51% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
4275.2 ms * ∼36% +56%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
3096 ms * ∼26% +68%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53)
2712.9 ms * ∼23% +72%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
181 Points ∼100% +65%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)
157 Points ∼87% +43%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
156 Points ∼86% +42%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)
110 Points ∼61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=10)
106 Points ∼59% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=260)
104 Points ∼57% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53)
57 Points ∼31% -48%

* ... smaller is better

Sony Xperia XA2 UltraXiaomi Mi Mix 2Honor View 10Samsung Galaxy A8 2018OnePlus 5TMaze Alpha XAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
90%
301%
5%
96%
4%
-13%
-23%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.31 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
62.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
73.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
17%
46 (3.4 - 87.1, n=104)
-27%
44.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=294)
-30%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
85.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
77.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
80.96 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
65.1 (8.2 - 96.5, n=104)
-24%
62.6 (8.2 - 96.5, n=294)
-27%
Random Write 4KB
10.1
15.75
56%
160
1484%
14.69
45%
20
98%
11.61
15%
18.1 (0.75 - 77.3, n=144)
79%
14.1 (0.14 - 164, n=575)
40%
Random Read 4KB
76
148.54
95%
144.3
90%
82.62
9%
138.1
82%
70.27
-8%
35.7 (3.59 - 117, n=144)
-53%
35.7 (1.59 - 173, n=575)
-53%
Sequential Write 256KB
138.8
208.62
50%
194.3
40%
104.2
-25%
203.4
47%
162.16
17%
93.6 (14.8 - 189, n=144)
-33%
74.7 (2.99 - 228, n=575)
-46%
Sequential Read 256KB
273.7
703.99
157%
810.3
196%
299.94
10%
698.7
155%
247.44
-10%
228 (25.8 - 440, n=144)
-17%
218 (12.1 - 895, n=575)
-20%
Arena of Valor
min
Razer Phone 2017
62 (min: 50, max: 64) fps ∼100% +100%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
31 (min: 5, max: 32) fps ∼50%
high HD
Razer Phone 2017
61 (min: 23, max: 62) fps ∼100% +103%
Samsung Galaxy S9
59 fps ∼97% +97%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
30 (min: 20, max: 32) fps ∼49%
Shadow Fight 3
high
Razer Phone 2017
60 (min: 55, max: 62) fps ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9
59 fps ∼98% +2%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
58 fps ∼97%
minimal
Razer Phone 2017
30 (min: 27, max: 31) fps ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
30 fps ∼100%
Battle Bay
half resolution
Razer Phone 2017
121 (min: 121, max: 121) fps ∼100% +98%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
61 (min: 14, max: 61) fps ∼50%
full resolution
Razer Phone 2017
121 (min: 116, max: 121) fps ∼100% +98%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
61 (min: 18, max: 61) fps ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S9
60 fps ∼50% -2%

Legend

 
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Razer Phone 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min31 fps
 high HD30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Shadow Fight 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high58 fps
 minimal30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Battle Bay
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 half resolution61 fps
 full resolution61 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 35.7 °C35.1 °C35.4 °C 
 36.4 °C35.1 °C35.8 °C 
 35.3 °C34.5 °C34 °C 
Máximo: 36.4 °C
Médio: 35.3 °C
30.9 °C36.1 °C36 °C
33 °C35.5 °C35.3 °C
33 °C34.9 °C34.3 °C
Máximo: 36.1 °C
Médio: 34.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  33.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.628.52524.925.33124.623.94026.426.25030.833.46323.619.38020.22510019.922.112517.628.616019.142.320019.145.625017.453.431516.95640016.857.850015.161.863016.562.980015.668.710001571.4125015.572.2160015.374.6200015.776.7250015.577.3315015.578.6400015.479.2500015.877.963001674.2800015.874.91000016.172.91250016.1711600017.361.8SPL27.987.7N167.9median 16Sony Xperia XA2 Ultramedian 71Delta0.610.635.243.132.931.737.233.831.733.839.63928.326.327.328.126.93026.729243920.948.820.952.519.554.518.559.917.562.917.564.215.763.115.865.116.666.415.873.815.474.915.5791677.415.876.31674.316.375.516.37616.275.816.466.216.450.528.686.61.163.6median 16.4Honor View 10median 65.12.112.3hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor View 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.42 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.77 / 2.12 / 2.17 Watt
Carga midlight 4.3 / 6.73 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
3580 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
3771 mAh
Honor View 10
3750 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Maze Alpha X
3900 mAh
Power Consumption
3%
-21%
27%
17%
1%
Idle Minimum *
0.77
0.69
10%
1.05
-36%
0.67
13%
0.58
25%
0.9
-17%
Idle Average *
2.12
2.03
4%
2.36
-11%
1.02
52%
1.44
32%
2.14
-1%
Idle Maximum *
2.17
2.1
3%
2.41
-11%
1.1
49%
1.53
29%
2.18
-0%
Load Average *
4.3
3.18
26%
4.93
-15%
3.86
10%
3.17
26%
3.96
8%
Load Maximum *
6.73
8.73
-30%
9.04
-34%
5.97
11%
8.54
-27%
5.81
14%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
29h 48min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 36min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 58min
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
3580 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
3771 mAh
Honor View 10
3750 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Maze Alpha X
3900 mAh
Battery Runtime
-29%
-2%
-6%
-5%
-12%
Reader / Idle
1788
1671
-7%
1546
-14%
1754
-2%
1624
-9%
H.264
876
819
-7%
908
4%
799
-9%
WiFi v1.3
849
600
-29%
679
-20%
646
-24%
718
-15%
603
-29%
Load
238
305
28%
260
9%
257
8%
240
1%

Pro

+ Carcaça robusta
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Fotos nítidas
+ Alto-falante poderoso
+ GPS preciso
+ Wi-Fi e LTE velozes
+ Botão dedicado da câmera
+ Tela muito brilhante
+ Software atualizado

Contra

- Alto consumo de energia
- Sem fonte de alimentação de carga rápida incluída
- Suporte limitado para bandas LTE
- Cortes do microfone
- Espaço de armazenamento apertado
- Distorções na câmera frontal de ângulo amplo
- Nível de preto comparativamente alto
In review: Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

"Sempre foi um pouco mais caro ter um gosto especial". Esse slogan ainda era verdade nos dias em que os smartphones da Sony ainda eram conhecidos como Sony Ericsson Xperia, e ainda é verdade para a unidade de teste de hoje com um preço de mercado de pouco menos de $430. Por apenas $50-$100 a mais, você pode obter um Honor View 10 ou OnePlus 5T com muito mais poder de processamento e melhor relação tela/corpo, para começar. No entanto, a incrível e excepcionalmente brilhante tela 16:9 da Sony é certamente um ponto de venda exclusivo.

As duas câmeras selfie na parte frontal permitem mais liberdade artística ao tirar fotos, permitindo que uma escolha entre uma foto regular e uma grande angular, embora este último vem com distorções nas bordas. A câmera principal ainda é uma prova incrível e viva de que até mesmo uma única lente pode produzir fotos incríveis. No entanto, o baixo desempenho do microfone do dispositivo foi uma grande decepção, especialmente considerando que costumávamos elogiar os smartphones da Sony por sua qualidade de voz superior no passado. O alto-falante, por outro lado, foi bastante decente e o GPS notavelmente preciso foi uma surpresa positiva. A experiência geral é acompanhada pelo software atualizado do dispositivo e pelos recursos de manipulação bastante decentes.

O Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra pode não ser o dispositivo mais moderno e certamente não é o mais acessível, mas seu pacote total resultou bastante impressionante.

Comprado por meio de sua operadora de rede, o Xperia XA2 Ultra pode ser o companheiro ideal para quem gosta de tirar selfies e não precisa de desempenho de ponta. Sua tela grande e bateria de longa duração são louváveis, no entanto, sugerimos que espere um pouco mais para que o preço caia para níveis mais aceitáveis.

Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra - 03/31/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
70 / 75 → 93%
Mouse
90%
Conectividade
46 / 60 → 76%
Peso
88%
Bateria
96%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
39 / 63 → 61%
Desempenho da aplicação
52 / 70 → 75%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
53 / 91 → 58%
Camera
80%
Médio
75%
85%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
Florian Wimmer, 2018-04- 9 (Update: 2018-04-16)