Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra

Name: Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
Brand: Sony

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/09/2018

Selfie, Selfie. "Duas câmeras traseiras? isto é tão 2017!" O mais recente smartphone de gama média Xperia XA2 Ultra da Sony apresenta uma câmara dupla virada para a frente para melhorar a qualidade das selfies. Vamos descobrir se isso foi ou não uma jogada inteligente, vamos?

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

size comparison OnePlus 5T - Xperia XA2 Ultra

Os Top 10

» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB eMMC Flash	656 MBit/s ∼100% +96%
OnePlus 5T Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	386 MBit/s ∼59% +16%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	334 MBit/s ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash	280 MBit/s ∼43% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1014, n=504)	244 MBit/s ∼37% -27%
Honor View 10 Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	200 MBit/s ∼30% -40%
Maze Alpha X Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash	82.8 MBit/s ∼13% -75%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 5T Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	650 MBit/s ∼100% +113%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB eMMC Flash	585 MBit/s ∼90% +92%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	305 MBit/s ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash	269 MBit/s ∼41% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 966, n=504)	227 MBit/s ∼35% -26%
Honor View 10 Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	223 MBit/s ∼34% -27%
Maze Alpha X Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash	95.1 MBit/s ∼15% -69%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra

OnePlus 5T

Apple iPhone X

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra

OnePlus 5T

Apple iPhone X

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra

OnePlus 5T

Apple iPhone X

Canon EOS 70D


716 cd/m²	686 cd/m²	652 cd/m²
729 cd/m²	659 cd/m²	669 cd/m²
711 cd/m²	639 cd/m²	659 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 729 cd/m² Médio: 680 cd/m² Minimum: 5.91 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 659 cd/m²
Contraste: 1177:1 (Preto: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
Gamma: 2.18

	Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra IPS, 1920x1080, 6	Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 IPS, 2160x1080, 6	Honor View 10 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99	Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 5.6	OnePlus 5T AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01	Maze Alpha X IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Screen		-2%	10%	-25%	4%	-125%
Brightness middle	659	472 -28%	530 -20%	541 -18%	425 -36%	497 -25%
Brightness	680	430 -37%	523 -23%	538 -21%	423 -38%	478 -30%
Brightness Distribution	88	87 -1%	88 0%	96 9%	92 5%	87 -1%
Black Level *	0.56	0.27 52%	0.35 37%			0.6 -7%
Contrast	1177	1748 49%	1514 29%			828 -30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	2.8	3.5 -25%	2.4 14%	5.8 -107%	2.1 25%	11.6 -314%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	6.5	5.9 9%	5.5 15%		3.4 48%	22.1 -240%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	3	4 -33%	2.2 27%	2.7 10%	2.5 17%	13.5 -350%
Gamma	2.18 ^101%	2.29 ^96%	2.25 ^98%	2.07 ^106%	2.32 ^95%	2.93 ^75%
CCT	6938 ^94%	7048 ^92%	6598 ^99%	6570 ^99%	6455 ^101%	9955 ^65%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

1479 Hz

≤ 5 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1479 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 5 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1479 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17159 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	70141 Points ∼40%
Honor View 10	173653 Points ∼100% +148%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	83284 Points ∼48% +19%
OnePlus 5T	172124 Points ∼99% +145%
Maze Alpha X	63989 Points ∼37% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12)	68642 Points ∼40% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (5600 - 293444, n=490)	87858 Points ∼51% +25%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	5051 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	7046 Points ∼100% +39%
Honor View 10	6724 Points ∼95% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	5214 Points ∼74% +3%
OnePlus 5T	6595 Points ∼94% +31%
Maze Alpha X	3795 Points ∼54% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4636 - 5987, n=12)	4968 Points ∼71% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 11690, n=438)	5517 Points ∼78% +9%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	5083 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	8169 Points ∼98% +61%
Honor View 10	8306 Points ∼100% +63%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	5916 Points ∼71% +16%
OnePlus 5T	7739 Points ∼93% +52%
Maze Alpha X	4562 Points ∼55% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4948 - 6264, n=13)	5632 Points ∼68% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 15193, n=601)	6014 Points ∼72% +18%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	912 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	1264 Points ∼95% +39%
Honor View 10	1184 Points ∼89% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	1195 Points ∼90% +31%
OnePlus 5T	1329 Points ∼100% +46%
Maze Alpha X	924 Points ∼70% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (666 - 936, n=13)	859 Points ∼65% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1745, n=668)	778 Points ∼59% -15%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	1492 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	5936 Points ∼97% +298%
Honor View 10	3892 Points ∼64% +161%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	1331 Points ∼22% -11%
OnePlus 5T	6100 Points ∼100% +309%
Maze Alpha X	1122 Points ∼18% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1409 - 1523, n=13)	1494 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=668)	2206 Points ∼36% +48%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	1325 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	3544 Points ∼83% +167%
Honor View 10	4276 Points ∼100% +223%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	2275 Points ∼53% +72%
OnePlus 5T	3845 Points ∼90% +190%
Maze Alpha X	1294 Points ∼30% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (838 - 1405, n=13)	1199 Points ∼28% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 7500, n=668)	1619 Points ∼38% +22%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	3287 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	5822 Points ∼99% +77%
Honor View 10	5195 Points ∼88% +58%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	4358 Points ∼74% +33%
OnePlus 5T	5872 Points ∼100% +79%
Maze Alpha X	3064 Points ∼52% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1763 - 3319, n=13)	3147 Points ∼54% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=668)	3145 Points ∼54% -4%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	1560 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	3527 Points ∼96% +126%
Honor View 10	3181 Points ∼86% +104%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	1993 Points ∼54% +28%
OnePlus 5T	3678 Points ∼100% +136%
Maze Alpha X	1424 Points ∼39% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1152 - 1570, n=13)	1479 Points ∼40% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6097, n=668)	1580 Points ∼43% +1%

Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	3738 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	7750 Points ∼86% +107%
Honor View 10	9015 Points ∼100% +141%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	3680 Points ∼41% -2%
OnePlus 5T	8000 Points ∼89% +114%
Maze Alpha X	2726 Points ∼30% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2910 - 3956, n=12)	3718 Points ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=338)	4773 Points ∼53% +28%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	4234 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	6649 Points ∼98% +57%
Honor View 10	6785 Points ∼100% +60%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	4431 Points ∼65% +5%
OnePlus 5T	6670 Points ∼98% +58%
Maze Alpha X	3795 Points ∼56% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2246 - 4234, n=13)	4009 Points ∼59% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 13279, n=398)	4834 Points ∼71% +14%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	865 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	1943 Points ∼99% +125%
Honor View 10	1918 Points ∼98% +122%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	1526 Points ∼78% +76%
OnePlus 5T	1962 Points ∼100% +127%
Maze Alpha X	833 Points ∼42% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (710 - 885, n=13)	853 Points ∼43% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4824, n=398)	1467 Points ∼75% +70%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	1706 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	2956 Points ∼96% +73%
Honor View 10	2931 Points ∼96% +72%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	1950 Points ∼64% +14%
OnePlus 5T	3068 Points ∼100% +80%
Maze Alpha X	1700 Points ∼55% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1631 - 1822, n=13)	1734 Points ∼57% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 4909, n=524)	1946 Points ∼63% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	727 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	4034 Points ∼100% +455%
Honor View 10	2994 Points ∼74% +312%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	618 Points ∼15% -15%
OnePlus 5T	4016 Points ∼100% +452%
Maze Alpha X	598 Points ∼15% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (704 - 729, n=13)	718 Points ∼18% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 8469, n=524)	1571 Points ∼39% +116%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	833 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	3732 Points ∼99% +348%
Honor View 10	2980 Points ∼79% +258%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	729 Points ∼19% -12%
OnePlus 5T	3758 Points ∼100% +351%
Maze Alpha X	699 Points ∼19% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (809 - 839, n=13)	825 Points ∼22% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 7012, n=525)	1504 Points ∼40% +81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	1698 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	2547 Points ∼84% +50%
Honor View 10	1906 Points ∼63% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	1946 Points ∼64% +15%
OnePlus 5T	3031 Points ∼100% +79%
Maze Alpha X	1725 Points ∼57% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1687 - 1816, n=13)	1746 Points ∼58% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 5054, n=565)	1814 Points ∼60% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	1256 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	5599 Points ∼97% +346%
Honor View 10	1954 Points ∼34% +56%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	879 Points ∼15% -30%
OnePlus 5T	5791 Points ∼100% +361%
Maze Alpha X	928 Points ∼16% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1234 - 1289, n=13)	1258 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 11488, n=564)	2053 Points ∼35% +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	1333 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	4422 Points ∼92% +232%
Honor View 10	1943 Points ∼40% +46%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	1001 Points ∼21% -25%
OnePlus 5T	4816 Points ∼100% +261%
Maze Alpha X	1034 Points ∼21% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1315 - 1374, n=13)	1341 Points ∼28% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8866, n=567)	1774 Points ∼37% +33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	13054 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	21337 Points ∼100% +63%
Honor View 10	14556 Points ∼68% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	13306 Points ∼62% +2%
OnePlus 5T	21348 Points ∼100% +64%
Maze Alpha X	15189 Points ∼71% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (12437 - 13217, n=13)	12963 Points ∼61% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 45072, n=715)	14596 Points ∼68% +12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	18528 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	57134 Points ∼98% +208%
Honor View 10	22429 Points ∼39% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	15262 Points ∼26% -18%
OnePlus 5T	58097 Points ∼100% +214%
Maze Alpha X	13708 Points ∼24% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (16508 - 18635, n=13)	18279 Points ∼31% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 209204, n=713)	23210 Points ∼40% +25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	16949 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	41618 Points ∼99% +146%
Honor View 10	20022 Points ∼48% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	14779 Points ∼35% -13%
OnePlus 5T	42022 Points ∼100% +148%
Maze Alpha X	14012 Points ∼33% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (15466 - 17032, n=13)	16750 Points ∼40% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 97276, n=713)	18684 Points ∼44% +10%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	29 fps ∼23%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	102 fps ∼82% +252%
Honor View 10	125 fps ∼100% +331%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	34 fps ∼27% +17%
OnePlus 5T	113 fps ∼90% +290%
Maze Alpha X	24 fps ∼19% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=13)	29.7 fps ∼24% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=734)	40.4 fps ∼32% +39%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	31 fps ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	60 fps ∼100% +94%
Honor View 10	59 fps ∼98% +90%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	31 fps ∼52% 0%
OnePlus 5T	60 fps ∼100% +94%
Maze Alpha X	21 fps ∼35% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (25 - 31, n=13)	29.2 fps ∼49% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 120, n=743)	29.1 fps ∼49% -6%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	14 fps ∼21%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	49 fps ∼74% +250%
Honor View 10	66 fps ∼100% +371%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	16 fps ∼24% +14%
OnePlus 5T	60 fps ∼91% +329%
Maze Alpha X	11 fps ∼17% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 14, n=13)	13.8 fps ∼21% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 175, n=638)	23.5 fps ∼36% +68%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	15 fps ∼27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	45 fps ∼82% +200%
Honor View 10	55 fps ∼100% +267%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	15 fps ∼27% 0%
OnePlus 5T	53 fps ∼96% +253%
Maze Alpha X	9.5 fps ∼17% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (11 - 15, n=13)	13.8 fps ∼25% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 115, n=647)	20.3 fps ∼37% +35%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	5.2 fps ∼13%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	34 fps ∼83% +554%
Honor View 10	21 fps ∼51% +304%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	9.9 fps ∼24% +90%
OnePlus 5T	41 fps ∼100% +688%
Maze Alpha X	3.7 fps ∼9% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=13)	9.38 fps ∼23% +80%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=503)	19 fps ∼46% +265%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	11 fps ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	34 fps ∼92% +209%
Honor View 10	36 fps ∼97% +227%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	9.6 fps ∼26% -13%
OnePlus 5T	37 fps ∼100% +236%
Maze Alpha X	6 fps ∼16% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=13)	9.36 fps ∼25% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=505)	17.6 fps ∼48% +60%

GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	5.5 fps ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	24 fps ∼96% +336%
Honor View 10	21 fps ∼84% +282%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	6 fps ∼24% +9%
OnePlus 5T	25 fps ∼100% +355%
Maze Alpha X	4.1 fps ∼16% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=13)	5.48 fps ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 73, n=428)	12.9 fps ∼52% +135%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	6 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	23 fps ∼100% +283%
Honor View 10	21 fps ∼91% +250%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	5.8 fps ∼25% -3%
OnePlus 5T	23 fps ∼100% +283%
Maze Alpha X	3.6 fps ∼16% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4.3 - 6, n=13)	5.48 fps ∼24% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=432)	11.5 fps ∼50% +92%

AnTuTu v7
MEM (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	5875 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	8830 Points ∼98% +50%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	6040 Points ∼67% +3%
OnePlus 5T	9027 Points ∼100% +54%
Maze Alpha X	4808 Points ∼53% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4871 - 6574, n=11)	5925 Points ∼66% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (915 - 32585, n=297)	7994 Points ∼89% +36%
UX (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	23713 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	42180 Points ∼91% +78%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	32150 Points ∼69% +36%
OnePlus 5T	46549 Points ∼100% +96%
Maze Alpha X	20935 Points ∼45% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (22684 - 25223, n=11)	24023 Points ∼52% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (6403 - 81494, n=296)	34356 Points ∼74% +45%
GPU (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	19927 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	83213 Points ∼97% +318%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	25640 Points ∼30% +29%
OnePlus 5T	85868 Points ∼100% +331%
Maze Alpha X	18218 Points ∼21% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (19664 - 19927, n=11)	19797 Points ∼23% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1572 - 221998, n=297)	45616 Points ∼53% +129%
CPU (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	39834 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	70234 Points ∼96% +76%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	52916 Points ∼72% +33%
OnePlus 5T	73371 Points ∼100% +84%
Maze Alpha X	29861 Points ∼41% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (38598 - 40000, n=11)	39650 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2443 - 153154, n=297)	55210 Points ∼75% +39%
Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	89349 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	204457 Points ∼95% +129%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	116746 Points ∼54% +31%
OnePlus 5T	214815 Points ∼100% +140%
Maze Alpha X	73822 Points ∼34% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=11)	89396 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 462516, n=297)	143610 Points ∼67% +61%

Legend

Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Honor View 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Maze Alpha X Mediatek Helio P25, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)	66.477 Points ∼100% +137%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)	49.07 Points ∼74% +75%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=564)	43.6 Points ∼66% +55%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)	34.871 Points ∼52% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12)	28.3 Points ∼43% +1%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)	28.107 Points ∼42%
Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64)	27.463 Points ∼41% -2%

Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)	12509 Points ∼100% +148%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53)	10122 Points ∼81% +100%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)	9350 Points ∼75% +85%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=725)	7128 Points ∼57% +41%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)	6729 Points ∼54% +33%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)	5052 Points ∼40%
Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64)	4990 Points ∼40% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13)	4963 Points ∼40% -2%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=750)	10258 ms * ∼100% -4%
Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64)	10244 ms * ∼100% -4%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)	9823.3 ms * ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13)	9702 ms * ∼95% +1%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)	6013 ms * ∼59% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)	4275.2 ms * ∼42% +56%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)	3096 ms * ∼30% +68%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53)	2712.9 ms * ∼26% +72%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)	181 Points ∼100% +65%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)	157 Points ∼87% +43%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)	156 Points ∼86% +42%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=335)	123 Points ∼68% +12%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)	110 Points ∼61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=10)	106 Points ∼59% -4%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53)	57 Points ∼31% -48%

* ... smaller is better

	Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	Xiaomi Mi Mix 2	Honor View 10	Samsung Galaxy A8 2018	OnePlus 5T	Maze Alpha X	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		90%	301%	5%	96%	4%	-8%	12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	63.31 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		65.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	62.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%		73.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 17%	51.3 (3.4 - 87.1, n=155) -19%	50.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=470) -21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	85.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%	77.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -9%		80.96 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%	70.2 (8.2 - 96.5, n=155) -18%	68.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=470) -21%
Random Write 4KB	10.1	15.75 56%	160 1484%	14.69 45%	20 98%	11.61 15%	18.1 (0.75 - 77.3, n=198) 79%	26.1 (0.14 - 259, n=802) 158%
Random Read 4KB	76	148.54 95%	144.3 90%	82.62 9%	138.1 82%	70.27 -8%	40 (3.59 - 117, n=198) -47%	51.3 (1.59 - 226, n=802) -32%
Sequential Write 256KB	138.8	208.62 50%	194.3 40%	104.2 -25%	203.4 47%	162.16 17%	95.4 (14.8 - 189, n=198) -31%	107 (2.99 - 729, n=802) -23%
Sequential Read 256KB	273.7	703.99 157%	810.3 196%	299.94 10%	698.7 155%	247.44 -10%	236 (25.8 - 452, n=198) -14%	295 (12.1 - 1781, n=802) 8%

Arena of Valor
min
Razer Phone 2017	62 (min: 50, max: 64) fps ∼100% +100%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	31 (min: 5, max: 32) fps ∼50%
high HD
Razer Phone 2017	61 (min: 23, max: 62) fps ∼100% +103%
Samsung Galaxy S9	59 fps ∼97% +97%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	30 (min: 20, max: 32) fps ∼49%

Shadow Fight 3
high
Razer Phone 2017	60 (min: 55, max: 62) fps ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9	59 fps ∼98% +2%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	58 fps ∼97%
minimal
Razer Phone 2017	30 (min: 27, max: 31) fps ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	30 fps ∼100%

Battle Bay
half resolution
Razer Phone 2017	121 (min: 121, max: 121) fps ∼100% +98%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	61 (min: 14, max: 61) fps ∼50%
full resolution
Razer Phone 2017	121 (min: 116, max: 121) fps ∼100% +98%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra	61 (min: 18, max: 61) fps ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S9	60 fps ∼50% -2%

Legend

Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Razer Phone 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Arena of Valor
	Configurações	Valor
	min	31 fps
	high HD	30 fps

Shadow Fight 3
	Configurações	Valor
	high	58 fps
	minimal	30 fps

Battle Bay
	Configurações	Valor
	half resolution	61 fps
	full resolution	61 fps

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


35.7 °C	35.1 °C	35.4 °C
36.4 °C	35.1 °C	35.8 °C
35.3 °C	34.5 °C	34 °C

Máximo: 36.4 °C
Médio: 35.3 °C


30.9 °C	36.1 °C	36 °C
33 °C	35.5 °C	35.3 °C
33 °C	34.9 °C	34.3 °C

Máximo: 36.1 °C
Médio: 34.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 33.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor View 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.02 / 0.42 Watt
Ocioso	0.77 / 2.12 / 2.17 Watt
Carga	4.3 / 6.73 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra 3580 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 3771 mAh	Honor View 10 3750 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 3000 mAh	OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh	Maze Alpha X 3900 mAh
Power Consumption		3%	-21%	27%	17%	1%
Idle Minimum *	0.77	0.69 10%	1.05 -36%	0.67 13%	0.58 25%	0.9 -17%
Idle Average *	2.12	2.03 4%	2.36 -11%	1.02 52%	1.44 32%	2.14 -1%
Idle Maximum *	2.17	2.1 3%	2.41 -11%	1.1 49%	1.53 29%	2.18 -0%
Load Average *	4.3	3.18 26%	4.93 -15%	3.86 10%	3.17 26%	3.96 8%
Load Maximum *	6.73	8.73 -30%	9.04 -34%	5.97 11%	8.54 -27%	5.81 14%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		29h 48min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		14h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 36min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 58min

	Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra 3580 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 3771 mAh	Honor View 10 3750 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 3000 mAh	OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh	Maze Alpha X 3900 mAh
Battery Runtime		-29%	-2%	-6%	-5%	-12%
Reader / Idle	1788		1671 -7%	1546 -14%	1754 -2%	1624 -9%
H.264	876		819 -7%	908 4%	799 -9%
WiFi v1.3	849	600 -29%	679 -20%	646 -24%	718 -15%	603 -29%
Load	238		305 28%	260 9%	257 8%	240 1%

Pro

+ Carcaça robusta

+ Longa duração da bateria

+ Fotos nítidas

+ Alto-falante poderoso

+ GPS preciso

+ Wi-Fi e LTE velozes

+ Botão dedicado da câmera

+ Tela muito brilhante

+ Software atualizado

Contra

- Alto consumo de energia

- Sem fonte de alimentação de carga rápida incluída

- Suporte limitado para bandas LTE

- Cortes do microfone

- Espaço de armazenamento apertado

- Distorções na câmera frontal de ângulo amplo

- Nível de preto comparativamente alto

In review: Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

"Sempre foi um pouco mais caro ter um gosto especial". Esse slogan ainda era verdade nos dias em que os smartphones da Sony ainda eram conhecidos como Sony Ericsson Xperia, e ainda é verdade para a unidade de teste de hoje com um preço de mercado de pouco menos de $430. Por apenas $50-$100 a mais, você pode obter um Honor View 10 ou OnePlus 5T com muito mais poder de processamento e melhor relação tela/corpo, para começar. No entanto, a incrível e excepcionalmente brilhante tela 16:9 da Sony é certamente um ponto de venda exclusivo.

As duas câmeras selfie na parte frontal permitem mais liberdade artística ao tirar fotos, permitindo que uma escolha entre uma foto regular e uma grande angular, embora este último vem com distorções nas bordas. A câmera principal ainda é uma prova incrível e viva de que até mesmo uma única lente pode produzir fotos incríveis. No entanto, o baixo desempenho do microfone do dispositivo foi uma grande decepção, especialmente considerando que costumávamos elogiar os smartphones da Sony por sua qualidade de voz superior no passado. O alto-falante, por outro lado, foi bastante decente e o GPS notavelmente preciso foi uma surpresa positiva. A experiência geral é acompanhada pelo software atualizado do dispositivo e pelos recursos de manipulação bastante decentes.

O Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra pode não ser o dispositivo mais moderno e certamente não é o mais acessível, mas seu pacote total resultou bastante impressionante.

Comprado por meio de sua operadora de rede, o Xperia XA2 Ultra pode ser o companheiro ideal para quem gosta de tirar selfies e não precisa de desempenho de ponta. Sua tela grande e bateria de longa duração são louváveis, no entanto, sugerimos que espere um pouco mais para que o preço caia para níveis mais aceitáveis.

Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra - 2018-03-3103/31/2018 v6^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento

87%

Teclado

70 / 75 → 93%

Mouse

90%

Conectividade

46 / 60 → 76%

Peso

88%

Bateria