Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A51 – Dedicado ao sucesso

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/28/2020

An exemplary mid-range phone. O Samsung Galaxy A51 é o sucessor de um dos smartphones mais bem sucedidos de 2019. Naturalmente, portanto, nossas expectativas são altas - mas a concorrência nunca dorme. Descubra se o smartphone Galaxy, com seu total de cinco câmeras, pode permanecer firme em nossa análise.

Samsung Galaxy A51 (Galaxy A50 Serie)
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
6.5 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 105 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 158.5 x 73.6
Bateria
4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​2.0, phase detection Auto Focus, LED flash, videos @2160p/​30fps (camera 1); 12.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, depth of field (camera 3); 5.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.2
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Um só alto-falante no lado inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Adaptador de CA de carga rápida, cabo USB, headset, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value: 0.369W/​kg (head), 1.59W/​kg (body); LTE speed: 600 Mbit/s (download) and 150 Mbit/s (upload); FM radio, fanless
peso
172 g, Suprimento de energia: 55 g
Preço
369 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

RatingDateModelWeightDriveSizeResolutionBest Price
80%01/2020Samsung Galaxy A51
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.5"2400x1080
80%04/2019Samsung Galaxy A50
Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3
166 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2340x1080
81%07/2019Xiaomi Mi 9T
730, Adreno 618
191 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.39"2340x1080
80%05/2019Google Pixel 3a
670, Adreno 616
147 g64 GB eMMC Flash5.6"2220x1080
84%10/2019Huawei Nova 5T
Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10
174 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.26"2340x1080
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Galaxy A51

Size Comparison

158.5 mm 73.6 mm 7.9 mm 172 g158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.7 mm 166 g156.7 mm 74.3 mm 8.8 mm 191 g154.25 mm 73.97 mm 7.87 mm 174 g151.3 mm 70.1 mm 8.2 mm 147 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
637 (min: 275, max: 679) MBit/s ∼100% +114%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
333 (min: 297, max: 343) MBit/s ∼52% +12%
Huawei Nova 5T
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
317 (min: 30, max: 340) MBit/s ∼50% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
298 (min: 185, max: 350) MBit/s ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=487)
235 MBit/s ∼37% -21%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
541 (min: 422, max: 570) MBit/s ∼100% +82%
Huawei Nova 5T
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
315 (min: 226, max: 345) MBit/s ∼58% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (min: 189, max: 335) MBit/s ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
293 (min: 161, max: 346) MBit/s ∼54% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼50% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 966, n=487)
221 MBit/s ∼41% -26%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø298 (185-350)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø297 (189-335)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bend
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bend
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Samsung Galaxy A51 – overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy A51 – overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy A51 – bend
GPS Samsung Galaxy A51 – bend
GPS Samsung Galaxy A51 – bridge
GPS Samsung Galaxy A51 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker Photo
27.8 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
32.2 ∆E
39 ∆E
52.7 ∆E
42 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
53 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
39.7 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
51.2 ∆E
53.4 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A51: 37.61 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 54.12 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
4.8 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A51: 5.94 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 17.17 ∆E
Test chart – perfect lighting
Test chart – perfect lighting
Test chart – 1 lux
Photo standard lens
Photo standard lens
Photo wide-angle lens
Photo wide-angle lens
Photo standard lens
Photo standard lens – manual brightness
Photo standard lens – automatic brightness
Photo standard lens
Photo standard lens
Photo standard lens
Photo standard lens
Photo standard lens
Photo standard lens
Photo standard lens
Photo standard lens
Photo standard lens
Photo standard lens
Photo standard lens
Photo wide-angle lens
Photo standard lens
Photo standard lens
Photo standard lens
Photo macro lens
576
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
589
cd/m²
602
cd/m²
576
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
609
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 609 cd/m² Médio: 589.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.8 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 589 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.22 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.111
Samsung Galaxy A51
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Xiaomi Mi 9T
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Google Pixel 3a
P-OLED, 2220x1080, 5.6
Huawei Nova 5T
LTPS, 2340x1080, 6.26
Screen
-2%
11%
-33%
-88%
Brightness middle
589
644
9%
589
0%
403
-32%
524
-11%
Brightness
589
628
7%
589
0%
411
-30%
510
-13%
Brightness Distribution
94
91
-3%
96
2%
96
2%
86
-9%
Black Level *
0.39
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.22
2.64
-19%
2.5
-13%
5.1
-130%
6.6
-197%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.24
9.23
-12%
4.9
41%
11
-33%
12.2
-48%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.6
2.5
4%
1.6
38%
2
23%
9.1
-250%
Gamma
2.111 104%
2.024 109%
2.24 98%
2.22 99%
2.34 94%
CCT
6508 100%
6649 98%
6544 99%
6589 99%
8987 72%
Contrast
1344

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 242.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13634 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1079 Points ∼49%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2203 Points ∼100% +104%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (663 - 1079, n=2)
871 Points ∼40% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3794, n=43)
1387 Points ∼63% +29%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1522 Points ∼45%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3360 Points ∼100% +121%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1393 - 1522, n=2)
1458 Points ∼43% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=50)
1786 Points ∼53% +17%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1326 Points ∼52%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2549 Points ∼100% +92%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1299 - 1326, n=2)
1313 Points ∼52% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=62)
1858 Points ∼73% +40%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
347 Points ∼49%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
707 Points ∼100% +104%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (347 - 349, n=2)
348 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=62)
530 Points ∼75% +53%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5649 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼70% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7533 Points ∼91% +33%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7387 Points ∼89% +31%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8279 Points ∼100% +47%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5649 - 5925, n=2)
5787 Points ∼70% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=423)
5425 Points ∼66% -4%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6416 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼69% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9049 Points ∼89% +41%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
9458 Points ∼93% +47%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
10209 Points ∼100% +59%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (6416 - 6697, n=2)
6557 Points ∼64% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=586)
5899 Points ∼58% -8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2161 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2786 Points ∼82% +29%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3406 Points ∼100% +58%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2134 - 2161, n=2)
2148 Points ∼63% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=95)
2647 Points ∼78% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1438 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1917 Points ∼40% +33%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4853 Points ∼100% +237%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1320 - 1438, n=2)
1379 Points ∼28% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=95)
2610 Points ∼54% +82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1554 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2060 Points ∼46% +33%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4434 Points ∼100% +185%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1442 - 1554, n=2)
1498 Points ∼34% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=95)
2400 Points ∼54% +54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2311 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼46% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3241 Points ∼66% +40%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼56% +20%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4917 Points ∼100% +113%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2103 - 2311, n=2)
2207 Points ∼45% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=431)
2014 Points ∼41% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1530 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼23% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2176 Points ∼42% +42%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1611 Points ∼31% +5%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5157 Points ∼100% +237%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1267 - 1530, n=2)
1399 Points ∼27% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=431)
1813 Points ∼35% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1654 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼26% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2347 Points ∼46% +42%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1772 Points ∼35% +7%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5102 Points ∼100% +208%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1390 - 1654, n=2)
1522 Points ∼30% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=432)
1690 Points ∼33% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2336 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼45% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3296 Points ∼66% +41%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2771 Points ∼55% +19%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4997 Points ∼100% +114%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2275 - 2336, n=2)
2306 Points ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=461)
1925 Points ∼39% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1993 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼24% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3316 Points ∼52% +66%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2533 Points ∼40% +27%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6350 Points ∼100% +219%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1634 - 1993, n=2)
1814 Points ∼29% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=461)
2420 Points ∼38% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2060 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼28% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3312 Points ∼55% +61%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2582 Points ∼43% +25%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5990 Points ∼100% +191%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1743 - 2060, n=2)
1902 Points ∼32% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=461)
2044 Points ∼34% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2217 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼52% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3227 Points ∼72% +46%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2728 Points ∼61% +23%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4509 Points ∼100% +103%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2217 - 2255, n=2)
2236 Points ∼50% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4909, n=511)
1922 Points ∼43% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1473 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼23% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2008 Points ∼41% +36%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1482 Points ∼30% +1%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4937 Points ∼100% +235%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1203 - 1473, n=2)
1338 Points ∼27% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=511)
1510 Points ∼31% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1592 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼27% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2192 Points ∼45% +38%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1651 Points ∼34% +4%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4835 Points ∼100% +204%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1342 - 1592, n=2)
1467 Points ∼30% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=512)
1457 Points ∼30% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2225 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼55% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3239 Points ∼73% +46%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2708 Points ∼61% +22%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4436 Points ∼100% +99%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2225 - 2286, n=2)
2256 Points ∼51% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=553)
1789 Points ∼40% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2027 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼21% -37%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3184 Points ∼52% +57%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2419 Points ∼40% +19%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6111 Points ∼100% +201%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1468 - 2027, n=2)
1748 Points ∼29% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=552)
1989 Points ∼33% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2068 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼25% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3196 Points ∼57% +55%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2477 Points ∼44% +20%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5638 Points ∼100% +173%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1595 - 2068, n=2)
1832 Points ∼32% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=555)
1724 Points ∼31% -17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20393 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼60% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
19433 Points ∼81% -5%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
18523 Points ∼78% -9%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
23870 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (20118 - 20393, n=2)
20256 Points ∼85% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=708)
14454 Points ∼61% -29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25086 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼32% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
46605 Points ∼91% +86%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
35401 Points ∼69% +41%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
51362 Points ∼100% +105%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (15971 - 25086, n=2)
20529 Points ∼40% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=706)
22753 Points ∼44% -9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23866 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼39% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
35557 Points ∼87% +49%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29229 Points ∼71% +22%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
40895 Points ∼100% +71%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (16738 - 23866, n=2)
20302 Points ∼50% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=706)
18376 Points ∼45% -23%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
46 fps ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼28% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
77 fps ∼56% +67%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
58 fps ∼42% +26%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
137 fps ∼100% +198%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (41 - 46, n=2)
43.5 fps ∼32% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=721)
39 fps ∼28% -15%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼60% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
58 fps ∼97% +45%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
52 fps ∼87% +30%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +50%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (37 - 40, n=2)
38.5 fps ∼64% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=730)
28.7 fps ∼48% -28%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24 fps ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼26% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼43% +58%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29 fps ∼33% +21%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
88 fps ∼100% +267%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (20 - 24, n=2)
22 fps ∼25% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=625)
22.6 fps ∼26% -6%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼36% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼58% +48%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
27 fps ∼46% +17%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +157%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (17 - 23, n=2)
20 fps ∼34% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=634)
19.9 fps ∼34% -13%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
15 fps ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼25% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼48% +80%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
20 fps ∼36% +33%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
56 fps ∼100% +273%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (14 - 15, n=2)
14.5 fps ∼26% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=490)
18.3 fps ∼33% +22%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼27% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
24 fps ∼50% +71%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
19 fps ∼40% +36%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
48 fps ∼100% +243%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (14 - 14, n=2)
14 fps ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=492)
17.2 fps ∼36% +23%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.5 fps ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼23% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9.3 fps ∼44% +69%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
4.4 fps ∼21% -20%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +282%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5.5 - 8.3, n=2)
6.9 fps ∼33% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=222)
9.88 fps ∼47% +80%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼22% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6.1 fps ∼44% +74%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7 fps ∼50% +100%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +300%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (3.5 - 3.6, n=2)
3.55 fps ∼25% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=220)
6.85 fps ∼49% +96%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.1 fps ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼25% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼45% +65%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼33% +21%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +263%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (8.8 - 9.1, n=2)
8.95 fps ∼27% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=226)
14.7 fps ∼45% +62%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼24% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼43% +60%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼32% +20%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +270%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (9.8 - 10, n=2)
9.9 fps ∼27% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=226)
16.3 fps ∼44% +63%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼28% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼50% +60%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼34% +10%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
32 fps ∼100% +220%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (9.6 - 10, n=2)
9.8 fps ∼31% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=415)
12.5 fps ∼39% +25%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.6 fps ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼29% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13 fps ∼46% +51%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
10 fps ∼36% +16%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
28 fps ∼100% +226%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (8.6 - 8.8, n=2)
8.7 fps ∼31% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=419)
11.2 fps ∼40% +30%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼63% +9170%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1099 Points ∼75% +10890%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1229 Points ∼84% +12190%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1462 Points ∼100% +14520%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (10 - 1025, n=2)
518 Points ∼35% +5080%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=656)
770 Points ∼53% +7600%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2168 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼26% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3559 Points ∼47% +64%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2818 Points ∼37% +30%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7640 Points ∼100% +252%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2127 - 2168, n=2)
2148 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=656)
2134 Points ∼28% -2%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1605 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼49% +55%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
4646 Points ∼91% +189%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
3288 Points ∼64% +105%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5116 Points ∼100% +219%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1605 - 2122, n=2)
1864 Points ∼36% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=656)
1584 Points ∼31% -1%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4738 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼60% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6760 Points ∼80% +43%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5480 Points ∼65% +16%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8456 Points ∼100% +78%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (4738 - 4978, n=2)
4858 Points ∼57% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=656)
3080 Points ∼36% -35%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
634 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼47% +246%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points ∼71% +425%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2811 Points ∼60% +343%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4689 Points ∼100% +640%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (634 - 2191, n=2)
1413 Points ∼30% +123%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=656)
1545 Points ∼33% +144%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
38475 Points ∼58%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
66660 Points ∼100% +73%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (33717 - 38475, n=2)
36096 Points ∼54% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 82947, n=41)
43533 Points ∼65% +13%
MEM (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
43405 Points ∼60%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
71845 Points ∼100% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (43405 - 44128, n=2)
43767 Points ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (24176 - 100390, n=41)
48115 Points ∼67% +11%
GPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36821 Points ∼27%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
135337 Points ∼100% +268%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (34020 - 36821, n=2)
35421 Points ∼26% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5938 - 209164, n=41)
81672 Points ∼60% +122%
CPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
62594 Points ∼46%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
136978 Points ∼100% +119%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (62594 - 63005, n=2)
62800 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40620 - 168185, n=41)
89213 Points ∼65% +43%
Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
181295 Points ∼44%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
410820 Points ∼100% +127%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (174870 - 181295, n=2)
178083 Points ∼43% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 534558, n=41)
262580 Points ∼64% +45%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
47.131 Points ∼100% +70%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=123)
36.2 Points ∼77% +31%
Google Pixel 3a
33.563 Points ∼71% +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (27.7 - 28.7, n=2)
28.2 Points ∼60% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
27.681 Points ∼59%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)
109.88 Points ∼100% +114%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
87.488 Points ∼80% +71%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (51.3 - 51.9, n=2)
51.6 Points ∼47% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
51.257 Points ∼47%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=552)
42.8 Points ∼39% -16%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
46.46 runs/min ∼100% +60%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=111)
39.8 runs/min ∼86% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)
33.07 runs/min ∼71% +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (29.1 - 30.5, n=2)
29.8 runs/min ∼64% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
29.1 runs/min ∼63%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)
124 Points ∼100% +118%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
86 Points ∼69% +51%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=184)
67.2 Points ∼54% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼50% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
57 Points ∼46%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (50 - 57, n=2)
53.5 Points ∼43% -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)
22379 Points ∼100% +120%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
17501 Points ∼78% +72%
Google Pixel 3a
10844 Points ∼48% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼46% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
10194 Points ∼46%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (9684 - 10194, n=2)
9939 Points ∼44% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=713)
6988 Points ∼31% -31%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=738)
10360 ms * ∼100% -137%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
4375.1 ms * ∼42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (4332 - 4375, n=2)
4354 ms * ∼42% -0%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼38% +11%
Google Pixel 3a
3589.4 ms * ∼35% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
2563.9 ms * ∼25% +41%
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)
2059 ms * ∼20% +53%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A51Samsung Galaxy A50Xiaomi Mi 9TGoogle Pixel 3aHuawei Nova 5TAverage 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
4%
-12%
63%
-2%
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
57 (33.6 - 70.2, n=12)
-5%
49.9 (1.7 - 87.1, n=458)
-17%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
74.3 (54 - 86, n=12)
2%
68.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=458)
-7%
Random Write 4KB
104.4
18.2
-83%
107.82
3%
99.86
-4%
247.05
137%
84.9 (13.5 - 180, n=16)
-19%
24.5 (0.14 - 259, n=788)
-77%
Random Read 4KB
110.8
98.9
-11%
128.65
16%
63.6
-43%
146.23
32%
119 (88.4 - 173, n=16)
7%
49.8 (1.59 - 226, n=788)
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB
184.9
192.1
4%
179.19
-3%
253.87
37%
186.43
1%
193 (143 - 257, n=16)
4%
102 (2.99 - 590, n=788)
-45%
Sequential Read 256KB
496.1
507.3
2%
492.74
-1%
301.99
-39%
904.03
82%
490 (409 - 733, n=16)
-1%
284 (12.1 - 1781, n=788)
-43%
010203040506070Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.32.1.2: Ø60 (60-61)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.32.1.2: Ø59.8 (53-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.9.3a: Ø27.8 (20-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.9.3a: Ø28.8 (18-31)
Carga Máxima
 38.8 °C35.9 °C33.3 °C 
 39.9 °C35.5 °C33.3 °C 
 39 °C35.4 °C32.7 °C 
Máximo: 39.9 °C
Médio: 36 °C
32.3 °C34.7 °C36.3 °C
31.5 °C34.2 °C39.3 °C
31.4 °C34.4 °C38.6 °C
Máximo: 39.3 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  38.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.544.22539.937.83134.532.54033.8355033.940.96328.933.58024.129.110023.22812523.233.516022.339.32002041.425018.743.531517.449.440017.153.550016.858.663014.562.680014.462.310001669.9125014.370.8160014.37020001570.8250014.272.1315014.273400014.166.3500014.569630014.569.2800014.971.91000015.265.31250015.557.31600016.156.6SPL68.227.281.7N22.60.949.7median 15.2median 62.6Delta2.510.942.246.742.143.934.636.737.342.739.84532.736.427.729.327.83125.734.323.340.22344.221.449.221.455.720.161.620.563.421.869.520.472.12074.618.273.918.972.9187419.174.518.276.71871.21968.21872.418.17518.166.418.252.318.148.365.965.66267.731.38518.518.514.623.11.662.7median 19.1median 68.21.811.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A51Samsung Galaxy A50
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A51 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.7 / 1.8 Watt
Carga midlight 5.2 / 6.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Google Pixel 3a
3000 mAh
Huawei Nova 5T
3750 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-2%
38%
27%
-12%
-5%
4%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.8
11%
0.54
40%
0.61
32%
0.87
3%
0.95 (0.9 - 1, n=2)
-6%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=807)
2%
Idle Average *
1.7
1.5
12%
0.95
44%
1.56
8%
2.34
-38%
1.8 (1.7 - 1.9, n=2)
-6%
1.742 (0.6 - 6.2, n=806)
-2%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
1.7
6%
1.08
40%
1.6
11%
2.4
-33%
2.1 (1.8 - 2.4, n=2)
-17%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=807)
-13%
Load Average *
5.2
5.9
-13%
2.7
48%
2.67
49%
4.56
12%
5.1 (5 - 5.2, n=2)
2%
4.08 (0.8 - 10.8, n=801)
22%
Load Maximum *
6.6
8.3
-26%
5.4
18%
4.33
34%
6.97
-6%
6.45 (6.3 - 6.6, n=2)
2%
5.95 (1.2 - 14.2, n=801)
10%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
28h 9min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 06min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 49min
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Google Pixel 3a
3000 mAh
Huawei Nova 5T
3750 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
25%
-12%
11%
Reader / Idle
1689
1587
-6%
2138
27%
H.264
846
869
3%
1208
43%
WiFi v1.3
698
701
0%
991
42%
612
-12%
776
11%
Load
289
275
-5%
258
-11%

Pro

+ Carcaça fina e elegante
+ Câmera flexível de boa quality
+ Muitas bandas LTE
+ Slot microSD dedicado
+ 60-fps em alguns jogos
+ Tela com cores precisas e brilhante
+ Quase sem desenvolvimento de calor

Contra

- Desempenho médio para essa faixa de preço
- A duração da bateria poderia ser mais longa
- Sem zoom continuo
- A navegação é lenta

Veredicto – boa gama média

Review: Samsung Galaxy A51.
Review: Samsung Galaxy A51.

O Galaxy A51 da Samsung é outro dispositivo intermediário que praticamente não apresenta fraquezas reais. Suas câmeras são um dos destaques - embora ainda seja perceptível a lacuna em relação aos gama alta, por exemplo, quando se trata de desempenho com pouca luz ou zoom. No entanto, o Galaxy A51 pode tirar algumas fotos muito legais. A tela AMOLED brilhante é outro prazer - ficamos particularmente impressionados com a boa tela colorida.

O telefone suporta uma quantidade significativamente maior de frequências LTE do que seu antecessor, mas o Wi-Fi continua lento. 

A Samsung poderia ter trabalhado um pouco mais em termos de desempenho e a duração da bateria não consegue acompanhar a de outros dispositivos. Esses são aspectos particularmente perceptíveis em uma comparação direta. Ainda assim, o Galaxy A51 é um telefone confiável de gama média.

O Galaxy A51 é um smartphone de gama média que faz um bom trabalho em todas as áreas e tira boas fotos.

Como a Samsung realmente não cometeu nenhum erro, podemos definitivamente recomendar o smartphone Galaxy A51.

Samsung Galaxy A51 - 01/13/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
83%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
46 / 70 → 65%
Peso
90%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
17 / 64 → 27%
Desempenho da aplicação
50 / 86 → 58%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
71 / 90 → 79%
Camera
63%
Médio
73%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A51 – Dedicado ao sucesso
Florian Schmitt, 2020-01-28 (Update: 2020-02- 2)