Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A80 – Um vencedor com uma câmera rotativa?

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/20/2019

Magia da câmera. 650 Euros (~$730) são muito dinheiro. Com o Galaxy A80, a Samsung oferece um smartphone topo de gama com uma câmara rotativa e uma frente sem entalhes para este valor. Vamos ver se o A80 oferece um valor suficiente pelo alto preço.

Samsung Galaxy A80 (Galaxy A Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 618
Memória
8192 MB 
Pantalha
6.7 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 106 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Saída de áudio via USB-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, sensor de brilho, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.3 x 165.2 x 76.5
Bateria
3700 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​2.0, phase comparison AF, LED flash, videos @2160p/​30fps (camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (camera 2); f/​1.2, ToF (camera 3); rotating
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo de carregamento, fones, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE Cat. 12/6 (600 Mbps download, 50 Mbps upload); SAR values: 0.22 W/kg (head), 1.43 W/kg (body), fanless
peso
220 g, Suprimento de energia: 75 g
Preço
650 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Samsung Galaxy A80
Samsung Galaxy A80
Samsung Galaxy A80
Samsung Galaxy A80
Samsung Galaxy A80
Samsung Galaxy A80
Samsung Galaxy A80
Samsung Galaxy A80

Size Comparison

165.2 mm 76.5 mm 9.3 mm 220 g162.5 mm 77 mm 7.8 mm 183 g157.7 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 182 g156.9 mm 75.4 mm 8.1 mm 180 g155.3 mm 76.6 mm 7.99 mm 181 g155 mm 75 mm 8 mm 172 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 9 PureView
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
638 (min: 561, max: 664) MBit/s ∼100% +49%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
584 (min: 557, max: 605) MBit/s ∼92% +36%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
578 (min: 474, max: 617) MBit/s ∼91% +35%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
428 (min: 360, max: 501) MBit/s ∼67%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
388 (min: 361, max: 421) MBit/s ∼61% -9%
Honor View 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
339 (min: 325, max: 351) MBit/s ∼53% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=434)
226 MBit/s ∼35% -47%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 9 PureView
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
523 (min: 421, max: 559) MBit/s ∼100% +85%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
502 (min: 465, max: 517) MBit/s ∼96% +78%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
330 (min: 232, max: 365) MBit/s ∼63% +17%
Honor View 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
298 (min: 278, max: 319) MBit/s ∼57% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
285 (min: 249, max: 304) MBit/s ∼54% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (min: 249, max: 327) MBit/s ∼54%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=434)
216 MBit/s ∼41% -23%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø427 (360-501)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø282 (249-327)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – junction
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – junction
GPS Samsung Galaxy A80 – overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy A80 – overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy A80 – bridge
GPS Samsung Galaxy A80 – bridge
GPS Samsung Galaxy A80 – junction
GPS Samsung Galaxy A80 – junction

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
484
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 499 cd/m² Médio: 485.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.85 cd/m²
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 478 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.97 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
98.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.031
Samsung Galaxy A80
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
LG G8s ThinQ
P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Honor View 20
LTPS, 2310x1080, 6.4
OnePlus 7
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
Nokia 9 PureView
P-OLED, 2880x1440, 5.99
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
OLED, 2220x1080, 6.3
Screen
6%
7%
8%
25%
23%
Brightness middle
478
539
13%
492
3%
603
26%
648
36%
553
16%
Brightness
486
556
14%
475
-2%
605
24%
641
32%
553
14%
Brightness Distribution
96
88
-8%
94
-2%
94
-2%
92
-4%
96
0%
Black Level *
0.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.97
3.78
-27%
2.4
19%
3.5
-18%
2.3
23%
2.2
26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.18
6.95
32%
5.2
49%
7.7
24%
5.2
49%
5.1
50%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
2.2
12%
3.2
-28%
2.7
-8%
2.2
12%
1.7
32%
Gamma
2.031 108%
2.274 97%
2.06 107%
2.266 97%
2.3 96%
2.06 107%
CCT
6533 99%
6013 108%
7125 91%
6775 96%
6592 99%
6434 101%
Contrast
1230

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9354 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7881 Points ∼59%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7442 Points ∼56% -6%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9028 Points ∼68% +15%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7372 Points ∼56% -6%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13272 Points ∼100% +68%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5542 Points ∼42% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (7795 - 7881, n=2)
7838 Points ∼59% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=319)
4690 Points ∼35% -40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6826 Points ∼60%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10274 Points ∼90% +51%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9868 Points ∼87% +45%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11388 Points ∼100% +67%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8909 Points ∼78% +31%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5826 Points ∼51% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (6826 - 6871, n=2)
6849 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=378)
4703 Points ∼41% -31%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2436 Points ∼69%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3406 Points ∼97% +40%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3314 Points ∼94% +36%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3510 Points ∼100% +44%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2421 Points ∼69% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1601 Points ∼46% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2436 - 2527, n=2)
2482 Points ∼71% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=378)
1421 Points ∼40% -42%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7177 Points ∼78%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9125 Points ∼99% +27%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9243 Points ∼100% +29%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9205 Points ∼100% +28%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8415 Points ∼91% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5789 Points ∼63% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (7177 - 7533, n=2)
7355 Points ∼80% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=370)
5253 Points ∼57% -27%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
8626 Points ∼68%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11890 Points ∼93% +38%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
12778 Points ∼100% +48%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
12095 Points ∼95% +40%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9917 Points ∼78% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6338 Points ∼50% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (8626 - 9049, n=2)
8838 Points ∼69% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14439, n=541)
5680 Points ∼44% -34%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2708 Points ∼81%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2794 Points ∼84% +3%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3324 Points ∼100% +23%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2857 Points ∼86% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2708 - 2786, n=2)
2747 Points ∼83% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=57)
2697 Points ∼81% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2160 Points ∼37%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4236 Points ∼72% +96%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5862 Points ∼100% +171%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4978 Points ∼85% +130%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (1917 - 2160, n=2)
2039 Points ∼35% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=57)
2792 Points ∼48% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2262 Points ∼45%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3800 Points ∼76% +68%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5012 Points ∼100% +122%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4273 Points ∼85% +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2060 - 2262, n=2)
2161 Points ∼43% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=57)
2534 Points ∼51% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3160 Points ∼72%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3309 Points ∼75% +5%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4381 Points ∼99% +39%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4416 Points ∼100% +40%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3456 Points ∼78% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2774 Points ∼63% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3160 - 3241, n=2)
3201 Points ∼72% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4635, n=378)
1959 Points ∼44% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2438 Points ∼34%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5184 Points ∼73% +113%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3718 Points ∼52% +53%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7089 Points ∼100% +191%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5828 Points ∼82% +139%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1268 Points ∼18% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2176 - 2438, n=2)
2307 Points ∼33% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=378)
1765 Points ∼25% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2568 Points ∼41%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4604 Points ∼74% +79%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3847 Points ∼62% +50%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6249 Points ∼100% +143%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5057 Points ∼81% +97%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1433 Points ∼23% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2347 - 2568, n=2)
2458 Points ∼39% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6875, n=379)
1637 Points ∼26% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3025 Points ∼69%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3293 Points ∼75% +9%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4393 Points ∼100% +45%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4405 Points ∼100% +46%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3368 Points ∼76% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2645 Points ∼60% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3025 - 3296, n=2)
3161 Points ∼72% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=407)
1868 Points ∼42% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3635 Points ∼35%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6358 Points ∼62% +75%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5327 Points ∼52% +47%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10302 Points ∼100% +183%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8435 Points ∼82% +132%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1757 Points ∼17% -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3316 - 3635, n=2)
3476 Points ∼34% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=407)
2344 Points ∼23% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3479 Points ∼44%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5268 Points ∼66% +51%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5087 Points ∼64% +46%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7940 Points ∼100% +128%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6322 Points ∼80% +82%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1898 Points ∼24% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3312 - 3479, n=2)
3396 Points ∼43% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=407)
1969 Points ∼25% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3215 Points ∼77%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3242 Points ∼78% +1%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4175 Points ∼100% +30%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4093 Points ∼98% +27%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3418 Points ∼82% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2073 Points ∼50% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3215 - 3227, n=2)
3221 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4492, n=458)
1866 Points ∼45% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2244 Points ∼35%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6040 Points ∼95% +169%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4256 Points ∼67% +90%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6336 Points ∼100% +182%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5123 Points ∼81% +128%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1185 Points ∼19% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2008 - 2244, n=2)
2126 Points ∼34% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=458)
1455 Points ∼23% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2405 Points ∼43%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5068 Points ∼90% +111%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4238 Points ∼75% +76%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5648 Points ∼100% +135%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4612 Points ∼82% +92%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1354 Points ∼24% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2192 - 2405, n=2)
2299 Points ∼41% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=459)
1400 Points ∼25% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3211 Points ∼76%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3505 Points ∼83% +9%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4214 Points ∼100% +31%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4068 Points ∼97% +27%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3179 Points ∼75% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2741 Points ∼65% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3211 - 3239, n=2)
3225 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4454, n=499)
1729 Points ∼41% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3478 Points ∼35%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6122 Points ∼61% +76%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5252 Points ∼52% +51%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10008 Points ∼100% +188%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8053 Points ∼80% +132%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1918 Points ∼19% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3184 - 3478, n=2)
3331 Points ∼33% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=498)
1894 Points ∼19% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3415 Points ∼45%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5251 Points ∼69% +54%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4979 Points ∼66% +46%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7556 Points ∼100% +121%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6007 Points ∼79% +76%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2054 Points ∼27% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3196 - 3415, n=2)
3306 Points ∼44% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8136, n=501)
1638 Points ∼22% -52%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
19389 Points ∼52%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30972 Points ∼83% +60%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
37164 Points ∼100% +92%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
36069 Points ∼97% +86%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
18523 Points ∼50% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (19389 - 19433, n=2)
19411 Points ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=660)
14068 Points ∼38% -27%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
51091 Points ∼52%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
97354 Points ∼100% +91%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
67388 Points ∼69% +32%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
83854 Points ∼86% +64%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
29065 Points ∼30% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (46605 - 51091, n=2)
48848 Points ∼50% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=658)
21690 Points ∼22% -58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
37475 Points ∼57%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
65945 Points ∼100% +76%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
57073 Points ∼87% +52%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
64782 Points ∼98% +73%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
25783 Points ∼39% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (35557 - 37475, n=2)
36516 Points ∼55% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=658)
17606 Points ∼27% -53%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
84 fps ∼50%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
85 fps ∼51% +1%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
118 fps ∼71% +40%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼100% +99%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
151 fps ∼90% +80%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
46 fps ∼28% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (77 - 84, n=2)
80.5 fps ∼48% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=681)
37.6 fps ∼23% -55%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
59 fps ∼98%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +2%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
50 fps ∼83% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (58 - 59, n=2)
58.5 fps ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=690)
27.9 fps ∼47% -53%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
42 fps ∼42%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
50 fps ∼50% +19%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
67 fps ∼67% +60%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
100 fps ∼100% +138%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
83 fps ∼83% +98%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
23 fps ∼23% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (38 - 42, n=2)
40 fps ∼40% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=587)
21.6 fps ∼22% -49%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
36 fps ∼60%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼85% +42%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +64%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +67%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
50 fps ∼83% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
21 fps ∼35% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (34 - 36, n=2)
35 fps ∼58% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=596)
19.2 fps ∼32% -47%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼45%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35 fps ∼52% +17%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
50 fps ∼75% +67%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
67 fps ∼100% +123%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼90% +100%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
15 fps ∼22% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (27 - 30, n=2)
28.5 fps ∼43% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=453)
17.7 fps ∼26% -41%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
26 fps ∼46%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼63% +38%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
48 fps ∼84% +85%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼100% +119%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32 fps ∼56% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
14 fps ∼25% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (24 - 26, n=2)
25 fps ∼44% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=455)
16.6 fps ∼29% -36%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼38%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
14 fps ∼54% +40%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
20 fps ∼77% +100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼100% +160%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13 fps ∼50% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
3 fps ∼12% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (9.3 - 10, n=2)
9.65 fps ∼37% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=171)
10.2 fps ∼39% +2%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6.8 fps ∼40%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8.5 fps ∼50% +25%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
14 fps ∼82% +106%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼100% +150%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼82% +106%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
4.8 fps ∼28% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (6.1 - 6.8, n=2)
6.45 fps ∼38% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=170)
7.08 fps ∼42% +4%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼42%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼58% +38%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
31 fps ∼82% +94%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps ∼100% +138%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
21 fps ∼55% +31%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
7.5 fps ∼20% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (15 - 16, n=2)
15.5 fps ∼41% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=175)
14.9 fps ∼39% -7%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼42%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼51% +22%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
34 fps ∼79% +89%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps ∼100% +139%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼86% +106%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.6 fps ∼20% -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (16 - 18, n=2)
17 fps ∼40% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=175)
16.7 fps ∼39% -7%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼40%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼52% +29%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
32 fps ∼76% +88%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼100% +147%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼83% +106%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
9.1 fps ∼22% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (16 - 17, n=2)
16.5 fps ∼39% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=378)
12.1 fps ∼29% -29%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼41%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
21 fps ∼57% +40%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
28 fps ∼76% +87%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
37 fps ∼100% +147%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
19 fps ∼51% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.3 fps ∼22% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (13 - 15, n=2)
14 fps ∼38% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=382)
10.9 fps ∼29% -27%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
202586 Points ∼55%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
321145 Points ∼87% +59%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
306296 Points ∼83% +51%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
370908 Points ∼100% +83%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
287123 Points ∼77% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
140878 Points ∼38% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (202586 - 210836, n=2)
206711 Points ∼56% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=289)
141941 Points ∼38% -30%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
1117 Points ∼79%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1171 Points ∼83% +5%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1404 Points ∼100% +26%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1407 Points ∼100% +26%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1317 Points ∼94% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1105 Points ∼79% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (1099 - 1117, n=2)
1108 Points ∼79% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=625)
755 Points ∼54% -32%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3855 Points ∼41%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8414 Points ∼89% +118%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7484 Points ∼79% +94%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9477 Points ∼100% +146%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7918 Points ∼84% +105%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2332 Points ∼25% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3559 - 3855, n=2)
3707 Points ∼39% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=625)
2037 Points ∼21% -47%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3435 Points ∼61%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4324 Points ∼77% +26%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5616 Points ∼100% +63%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5610 Points ∼100% +63%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4072 Points ∼73% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2393 Points ∼43% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3435 - 4646, n=2)
4041 Points ∼72% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=625)
1504 Points ∼27% -56%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6484 Points ∼72%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8718 Points ∼97% +34%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8594 Points ∼96% +33%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8986 Points ∼100% +39%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7940 Points ∼88% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5063 Points ∼56% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (6484 - 6760, n=2)
6622 Points ∼74% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=625)
2952 Points ∼33% -54%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3129 Points ∼61%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4389 Points ∼86% +40%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4746 Points ∼93% +52%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5089 Points ∼100% +63%
Nokia 9 PureView
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4285 Points ∼84% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2364 Points ∼46% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3129 - 3329, n=2)
3229 Points ∼63% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=625)
1480 Points ∼29% -53%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
63.057 Points ∼100% +58%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 74)
60.893 Points ∼97% +52%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
53.783 Points ∼85% +34%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
44.6 Points ∼71% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (40 - 47.1, n=2)
43.6 Points ∼69% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
40.021 Points ∼63%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=100)
35.5 Points ∼56% -11%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus 7 (Chome 74)
67.9 runs/min ∼100% +75%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 74)
67.5 runs/min ∼99% +74%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chome 75)
64.1 runs/min ∼94% +65%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
50.47 runs/min ∼74% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (38.9 - 46.5, n=2)
42.7 runs/min ∼63% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=89)
39.6 runs/min ∼58% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chome 75)
38.9 runs/min ∼57%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
110 Points ∼100% +43%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼97% +39%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
99 Points ∼90% +29%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
89 Points ∼81% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (77 - 86, n=2)
81.5 Points ∼74% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
77 Points ∼70%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=156)
67.2 Points ∼61% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
59 Points ∼54% -23%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
25051 Points ∼100% +53%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
23830 Points ∼95% +46%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
22500 Points ∼90% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (16358 - 17501, n=2)
16930 Points ∼68% +3%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
16484 Points ∼66% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
16358 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
10145 Points ∼40% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=683)
6705 Points ∼27% -59%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=708)
10599 ms * ∼100% -250%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
3841.8 (min: 1) ms * ∼36% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
3027 ms * ∼29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2564 - 3027, n=2)
2795 ms * ∼26% +8%
Nokia 9 PureView (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
2375 ms * ∼22% +22%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
2048.1 ms * ∼19% +32%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
2036 ms * ∼19% +33%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
1958 ms * ∼18% +35%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A80LG G8s ThinQHonor View 20OnePlus 7Nokia 9 PureViewSamsung Galaxy A9 2018Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
27%
172%
95%
14%
-6%
95%
-39%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
46.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.5 (27.8 - 72.4, n=17)
49.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=417)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
67.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77 (31.3 - 88.2, n=17)
67.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=417)
Random Write 4KB
21.6
29.6
37%
138.85
543%
28.7
33%
20.18
-7%
19.79
-8%
86.8 (18.2 - 250, n=39)
302%
21.5 (0.14 - 250, n=733)
0%
Random Read 4KB
117.5
138
17%
168.91
44%
175.3
49%
131.98
12%
116.76
-1%
139 (98.9 - 158, n=39)
18%
46.5 (1.59 - 196, n=733)
-60%
Sequential Write 256KB
190.4
182.4
-4%
250.06
31%
392
106%
200.3
5%
194.65
2%
205 (182 - 503, n=39)
8%
95.4 (2.99 - 590, n=733)
-50%
Sequential Read 256KB
501.5
791.1
58%
847.48
69%
1463
192%
727.97
45%
426.63
-15%
751 (427 - 912, n=39)
50%
269 (12.1 - 1504, n=733)
-46%
010203040506070Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A80 Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; min; 1.30.2.4: Ø59.3 (1-60)
LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; min; 1.29.1.2: Ø60.1 (59-61)
OnePlus 7 Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; Arena of Valor; min; 1.29.1.2: Ø59.9 (59-60)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.30.2.4: Ø59.7 (51-60)
LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.29.1.2: Ø60.1 (53-61)
OnePlus 7 Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.29.1.2: Ø59.9 (58-60)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.6.3a: Ø26.5 (6-29)
LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.6.3a: Ø27.9 (24-30)
OnePlus 7 Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.5.4a: Ø29.7 (27-31)
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality: Ø27.7 (24-30)
Samsung Galaxy A80 Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.6.3a: Ø26.9 (23-29)
LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.6.3a: Ø28.1 (26-30)
OnePlus 7 Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.5.4a: Ø30 (29-31)
Carga Máxima
 40.5 °C41.4 °C37.9 °C 
 40.4 °C41.4 °C37.8 °C 
 40.1 °C40.3 °C37.9 °C 
Máximo: 41.4 °C
Médio: 39.7 °C
33.3 °C39.6 °C38 °C
33.9 °C38.7 °C38 °C
34.3 °C37.5 °C37.5 °C
Máximo: 39.6 °C
Médio: 36.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  37.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.948.42543.6423138.338.64038.342.45041.245.96334.139.8802730.110028.629.612527.929.216026.132.220025.141.72502249.431520.557.440020.561.850020.664.463018.666.780018.170.7100018.575.1125017.972.3160018.674.8200017.873.8250017.573.5315016.970.6400016.863.550001768.863001778.1800017.273.41000017.166.81250017.154.91600017.360.9SPL65.174.766.430.384.7N19.134.418.71.460.5median 18.1median 66.7Delta2.711.332.83924.328.518.619.924.330.133.835.221.223.424.82318.525.216.436.617.144.517.941.816.850.714.953.915.158.714.262.913.966.514.86814.269.414.771.214.473.414.372.31475.313.880.214.88114.475.61573.714.773.614.870.514.860.814.75526.787.50.865.9median 14.8median 680.610.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A80Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A80 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.6 / 1.2 / 1.4 Watt
Carga midlight 5 / 7.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Honor View 20
4000 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
Nokia 9 PureView
3320 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
3800 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-43%
-59%
-6%
-67%
-31%
12%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
1.2
-100%
0.97
-62%
0.6
-0%
1.65
-175%
1.06
-77%
0.57 (0.54 - 0.6, n=2)
5%
0.877 (0.2 - 3.4, n=769)
-46%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.6
-33%
2.58
-115%
1.1
8%
2.34
-95%
1.94
-62%
1.075 (0.95 - 1.2, n=2)
10%
1.734 (0.6 - 6.2, n=768)
-45%
Idle Maximum *
1.4
2
-43%
2.63
-88%
2
-43%
2.43
-74%
1.98
-41%
1.24 (1.08 - 1.4, n=2)
11%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=769)
-44%
Load Average *
5
5
-0%
5.24
-5%
4
20%
5.02
-0%
3.56
29%
3.85 (2.7 - 5, n=2)
23%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=763)
19%
Load Maximum *
7.1
10
-41%
8.73
-23%
8
-13%
6.51
8%
7.49
-5%
6.25 (5.4 - 7.1, n=2)
12%
5.9 (1.2 - 14.2, n=763)
17%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
29h 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 20min
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Honor View 20
4000 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
Nokia 9 PureView
3320 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
3800 mAh
Battery Runtime
-6%
14%
20%
-20%
3%
Reader / Idle
1796
1689
-6%
1928
7%
1989
11%
1250
-30%
1780
-1%
H.264
902
753
-17%
932
3%
933
3%
732
-19%
1005
11%
WiFi v1.3
713
693
-3%
969
36%
901
26%
486
-32%
689
-3%
Load
200
203
2%
222
11%
278
39%
202
1%
205
3%

Pro

+ Carga muito rápida
+ Quase toda a frente é a tela
+ Ótima qualidade das selfies
+ Duração da bateria sólida
+ Muitas bandas de frequência LTE
+ Carcaça estável

Contra

- Pesado
- Sem reconhecimento facial
- Sensor de digitais um pouco lento
- A câmera não tem um estabilizador ótico de imagem...
- ... e também não conta com um zoom ótico variável
- GPS bastante impreciso
- Câmera ToF é dificilmente usada
- Qualidade de voz medíocre

Veredicto – Ganho a um preço alto

Testing the Samsung Galaxy A80. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
Testing the Samsung Galaxy A80. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

O smartphone Galaxy A80 de alta classe da Samsung é um dispositivo bastante grande e também pesado que ganha pontos com várias inovações: A tecnologia de carregamento rápido que usa 25 watts é convincente e até agora não esteve disponível nos modelos Galaxy-S mais caros. 

Ao mesmo tempo, a frente vem completamente sem qualquer entalhe e com marcos muito finos. Isso leva a algumas inovações adicionais, como usar a tela como um fone de ouvido que proporciona uma qualidade de som bastante medíocre, ou o sensor de digitais abaixo da tela que também não funciona tão bem quanto um sensor na carcaça. 

Mas a inovação mais espetacular é certamente a câmera principal rotativa que garante selfies de alta qualidade. No entanto, na realidade, a câmera é bastante média, e a câmera ToF embutida também é pouco utilizada, nem para reconhecimento de rosto, nem para truques de operação como no LG G8s ThinQ. Apenas o aplicativo de medição começa a usar a câmera inovadora. Não há zoom óptico nem estabilizador óptico de imagem e, quando a câmera é girada, o flash não funciona. Tudo isso limita o entusiasmo por essa solução.

O Samsung Galaxy A80 não é perfeito e um pouco caro para o que oferece, mas há muitas inovações chamativas.

A duração da bateria é sólida, mas também não há revolução, e o mesmo vale para a tela. Além disso, existem smartphones com mais desempenho e um GPS mais preciso pelo mesmo preço.

Aqueles que se apaixonaram pela câmera rotativa têm que conviver com algumas desvantagens, mas também obter um smartphone de alta qualidade e, apesar de tudo, rápido, com recursos incomuns que dificilmente esquenta.

Samsung Galaxy A80 - 07/18/2019 v6(old)
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
97%
Conectividade
41 / 60 → 69%
Peso
88%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
60 / 63 → 96%
Desempenho da aplicação
69 / 70 → 98%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
57 / 91 → 63%
Camera
79%
Médio
78%
87%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A80 – Um vencedor com uma câmera rotativa?
Florian Schmitt, 2019-07-20 (Update: 2019-07-20)