Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone LG G8S ThinQ: Inovador ou desatualizado?

Um entalhe grande demais. O LG G8S ThinQ chegou atrasado para a festa, mas ainda traz um SoC carro-chefe, uma grande tela OLED, uma câmera ToF e uma bateria de 3.550 mAh. O G8S ThinQ pode ter tecnologia de câmera sofisticada, mas, de outra forma, é um carro-chefe bastante comum. No entanto, continue lendo para descobrir por que ainda pensamos muito na última tentativa da LG de interromper a ordem estabelecida.
LG G8s ThinQ (G8 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 8 x 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)
Placa gráfica
Memória
6 GB 
Pantalha
6.20 polegadas 18.7:9, 2248 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, P-OLED, Notch, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 106 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 2 TB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, barômetro, bússola, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, USB Type-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B17, B20, B28, B32, B38, B39, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.99 x 155.3 x 76.6
Bateria
3550 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Quick Charge 3.0
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix , f/1.8, Phase Detection AF (PDAF), LED Flash, videos at 2160p/ 60 FPS. 13.0 MP, f/2.4, wide-angle lens. 12.0 MP, f/2.6, telephoto lens.
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , f/1.9, vídeos a 1080p / 30 FPS. ToF secondary camera
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador USB, cabo USB, carcaça de silicone, pano de limpeza, headset, USB tool, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Body - 1.587 W/kg, Head - 0.482 W/kg. LTE Cat 20/5 (2,000 Mbps/75 Mbps), fanless
peso
181 g, Suprimento de energia: 65 g
Preço
669 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

LG G8S ThinQ
LG G8S ThinQ
LG G8S ThinQ
LG G8S ThinQ
LG G8S ThinQ
LG G8S ThinQ
LG G8S ThinQ
LG G8S ThinQ

Size Comparison

167 mm 72 mm 8.2 mm 178 g162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g155.3 mm 76.6 mm 7.99 mm 181 g153.2 mm 71.9 mm 7.9 mm 162 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g149.1 mm 71.36 mm 7.57 mm 165 g142.2 mm 69.9 mm 7.9 mm 150 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P30
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
680 (646min - 700max) MBit/s +35%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 MBit/s +30%
Apple iPhone XR
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
644 (578min - 672max) MBit/s +28%
Sony Xperia 1
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
531 (414min - 620max) MBit/s +6%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
502 (465min - 517max) MBit/s
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (438min - 506max) MBit/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
468 (351min - 489max) MBit/s -7%
iperf3 receive AX12
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
656 MBit/s +13%
Sony Xperia 1
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
617 (356min - 662max) MBit/s +7%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
578 (474min - 617max) MBit/s
Huawei P30
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
544 (38min - 618max) MBit/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
520 (445min - 571max) MBit/s -10%
Apple iPhone XR
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
517 (477min - 528max) MBit/s -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
467 (375min - 519max) MBit/s -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s -35%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595Tooltip
LG G8s ThinQ; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø578 (474-617)
LG G8s ThinQ; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø502 (465-517)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS test: LG G8S ThinQ - Overview
GPS test: LG G8S ThinQ - Overview
GPS test: LG G8S ThinQ - Loop
GPS test: LG G8S ThinQ - Loop
GPS test: LG G8S ThinQ – Bridge q
GPS test: LG G8S ThinQ – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Standard sensor
Standard sensor
Telephoto lens
Telephoto lens
Ultra-wide sensor
Ultra-wide sensor
Standard sensor during a train ride
Standard sensor during a train ride
Standard sensor
Telephoto lens during a train ride
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
Our test chart in detail
A photo of our test chart shot in low light at 1 lux
531
cd/m²
549
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
538
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
572
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 605 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 555.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 539 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
146.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.274
LG G8s ThinQ
P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.20
Apple iPhone XR
IPS, 1792x828, 6.10
Sony Xperia 1
OLED, 3840x1644, 6.50
LG G7 ThinQ
IPS, 3120x1440, 6.10
OnePlus 7 Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy S10e
AMOLED, 2280x1080, 5.80
Huawei P30
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.10
Screen
29%
35%
-16%
29%
13%
26%
Brightness middle
539
672
25%
541
0%
974
81%
586
9%
426
-21%
561
4%
Brightness
556
641
15%
543
-2%
975
75%
584
5%
427
-23%
560
1%
Brightness Distribution
88
92
5%
99
13%
96
9%
97
10%
96
9%
95
8%
Black Level *
0.35
0.49
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.78
1.3
66%
0.8
79%
5.4
-43%
1.39
63%
2.14
43%
1.5
60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.95
2.7
61%
1.7
76%
13.1
-88%
2.7
61%
3.29
53%
2.5
64%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
2.2
-0%
1.2
45%
5
-127%
1.6
27%
1.8
18%
1.8
18%
Gamma
2.274 97%
2.3 96%
2.2 100%
2.31 95%
2.243 98%
2.111 104%
2.2 100%
CCT
6013 108%
6868 95%
6601 98%
7480 87%
6672 97%
6329 103%
6512 100%
Contrast
1920
1988

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 235 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 235 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 235 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18034 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3406 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
4750 Points +39%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3506 Points +3%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2448 Points -28%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3472 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4506 Points +32%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3207 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3406 - 3537, n=14)
3480 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (800 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)
5109 Points +50%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10274 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
11276 Points +10%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11172 Points +9%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
9029 Points -12%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10812 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10553 Points +3%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9547 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10187 - 11388, n=14)
10955 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)
13696 Points +33%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7442 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
21070 Points +183%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7509 Points +1%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
13497 Points +81%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7470 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10170 Points +37%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5864 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (7372 - 8024, n=12)
7629 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2053 - 18432, n=71, last 2 years)
10674 Points +43%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11890 Points
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10747 Points -10%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
9503 Points -20%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
11766 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10008 Points -16%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9890 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10330 - 14439, n=19)
12161 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points +27%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9125 Points
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8760 Points -4%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7717 Points -15%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9974 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
7966 Points -13%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8016 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8342 - 11440, n=19)
9710 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points +19%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
65945 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
77597 Points +18%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
65656 Points 0%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
56669 Points -14%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
64389 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
56465 Points -14%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
35680 Points -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (55771 - 83518, n=17)
70036 Points +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
97354 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
162695 Points +67%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
105718 Points +9%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
80534 Points -17%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
106829 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
72022 Points -26%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
44261 Points -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (97354 - 110432, n=17)
105781 Points +9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30972 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
27413 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
28223 Points -9%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
27817 Points -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
26936 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
32155 Points +4%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
21257 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (20636 - 45072, n=18)
32923 Points +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5251 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
5724 Points +9%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7197 Points +37%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5799 Points +10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7501 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4015 Points -24%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3337 Points -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5251 - 7820, n=18)
7091 Points +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (712 - 7285, n=52, last 2 years)
3548 Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6122 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
7806 Points +28%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9447 Points +54%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7633 Points +25%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9845 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4507 Points -26%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3281 Points -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6122 - 10008, n=18)
9272 Points +51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (618 - 9451, n=52, last 2 years)
3905 Points -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3505 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
2960 Points -16%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3656 Points +4%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3150 Points -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4091 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
2906 Points -17%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3548 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3001 - 4618, n=18)
3925 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4525, n=52, last 2 years)
3005 Points -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5268 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
7555 Points +43%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5552 Points +5%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5877 Points +12%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7955 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4321 Points -18%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3226 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5268 - 8141, n=18)
7186 Points +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=115, last 2 years)
9038 Points +72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6358 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
14085 Points +122%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9158 Points +44%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7882 Points +24%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10420 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4886 Points -23%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3491 Points -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6358 - 10420, n=18)
9569 Points +51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=114, last 2 years)
15757 Points +148%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3293 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
2880 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2345 Points -29%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3109 Points -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4352 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3077 Points -7%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2550 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2345 - 4703, n=18)
3892 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=114, last 2 years)
4335 Points +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5068 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3629 Points -28%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4556 Points -10%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4471 Points -12%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5581 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4477 Points -12%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4020 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4556 - 5747, n=20)
5489 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=104, last 2 years)
2680 Points -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6040 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3806 Points -37%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5663 Points -6%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5006 Points -17%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6248 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
5206 Points -14%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4200 Points -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5429 - 6362, n=20)
6201 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=104, last 2 years)
2667 Points -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3242 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3121 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2705 Points -17%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3255 Points 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4063 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3005 Points -7%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3496 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2705 - 4612, n=20)
3954 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=104, last 2 years)
3126 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4604 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
4405 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3969 Points -14%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4735 Points +3%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6270 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4620 Points 0%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3707 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3969 - 6404, n=20)
5819 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=177, last 2 years)
6571 Points +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5184 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
5061 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5674 Points +9%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5322 Points +3%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7115 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
5368 Points +4%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4162 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5184 - 7148, n=20)
6793 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=176, last 2 years)
9383 Points +81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3309 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3030 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1934 Points -42%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3416 Points +3%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4429 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3106 Points -6%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2682 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1934 - 5024, n=20)
3942 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=176, last 2 years)
4169 Points +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3800 Points
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3832 Points +1%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Points +31%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4165 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3800 - 5012, n=20)
4719 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6439, n=98, last 2 years)
2606 Points -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4236 Points
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5007 Points +18%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5794 Points +37%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4613 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4236 - 5884, n=20)
5618 Points +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=98, last 2 years)
2765 Points -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2794 Points
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2104 Points -25%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3317 Points +19%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3080 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2104 - 3452, n=20)
3045 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 3525, n=98, last 2 years)
2671 Points -4%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps 0%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
60 fps 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
60 fps 0%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
59 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (59 - 91, n=20)
63.4 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=180, last 2 years)
83.1 fps +39%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
85 fps
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
232 fps +173%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps +96%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
144 fps +69%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
166 fps +95%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
141 fps +66%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
122 fps +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (85 - 167, n=20)
153.1 fps +80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=180, last 2 years)
243 fps +186%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps +18%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps +18%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
41 fps -20%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
55 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
59 fps +16%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
59 fps +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (46 - 85, n=20)
59.6 fps +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=181, last 2 years)
70.8 fps +39%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
50 fps
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
132 fps +164%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps +100%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
63 fps +26%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
101 fps +102%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
85 fps +70%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
87 fps +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (50 - 102, n=20)
92.3 fps +85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=181, last 2 years)
137.8 fps +176%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps +67%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps +14%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
26 fps -28%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
53 fps +47%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
54 fps +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (27 - 58, n=20)
47.7 fps +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=181, last 2 years)
59.7 fps +66%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35 fps
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
88 fps +151%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
55 fps +57%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
51 fps +46%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
71 fps +103%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
53 fps +51%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
50 fps +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (35 - 71, n=20)
62 fps +77%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=181, last 2 years)
97.1 fps +177%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
21 fps
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
58 fps +176%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps +57%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
17 fps -19%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
21 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
40 fps +90%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
27 fps +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (16 - 41, n=20)
31.7 fps +51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=181, last 2 years)
42.7 fps +103%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
54 fps +145%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps +91%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
33 fps +50%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps +91%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
43 fps +95%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
30 fps +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 43, n=20)
39.2 fps +78%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=181, last 2 years)
58.6 fps +166%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
59 fps +168%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
34 fps +55%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
20 fps -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
23 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
16 fps -27%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (17 - 38, n=20)
32.5 fps +48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=221, last 2 years)
43.1 fps +96%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
63 fps +186%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps +91%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
37 fps +68%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps +91%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
41 fps +86%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 43, n=21)
39.9 fps +81%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=221, last 2 years)
63.1 fps +187%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
14 fps
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
59 fps +321%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
17 fps +21%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
13 fps -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
15 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
28 fps +100%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
20 fps +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (11 - 26, n=20)
20.9 fps +49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 105, n=221, last 2 years)
32.1 fps +129%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8.5 fps
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
20 fps +135%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps +159%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
14 fps +65%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
16 fps +88%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
16 fps +88%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
14 fps +65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8.5 - 24, n=21)
16.2 fps +91%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=221, last 2 years)
25.1 fps +195%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
321145 Points
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
334123 Points +4%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
256276 Points -20%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
369294 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
329444 Points +3%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
290650 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (217967 - 398720, n=16)
354450 Points +10%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4389 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
5721 Points +30%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4112 Points -6%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4257 Points -3%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4982 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4548 Points +4%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4327 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3847 - 5397, n=19)
4796 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=162, last 2 years)
5686 Points +30%
System (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8718 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
11946 Points +37%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8870 Points +2%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8070 Points -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9143 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
7831 Points -10%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7684 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5993 - 9143, n=19)
8539 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=162, last 2 years)
9595 Points +10%
Memory (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4324 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3263 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2661 Points -38%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3744 Points -13%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5243 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4474 Points +3%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5425 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2661 - 7500, n=19)
5097 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12306, n=162, last 2 years)
6206 Points +44%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8414 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
15969 Points +90%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9318 Points +11%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7906 Points -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9421 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
8484 Points +1%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6751 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8125 - 9510, n=19)
9174 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=162, last 2 years)
13856 Points +65%
Web (sort by value)
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1171 Points
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
1722 Points +47%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1300 Points +11%
LG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
1374 Points +17%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1364 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
1439 Points +23%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1246 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1076 - 1601, n=19)
1356 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=162, last 2 years)
1487 Points +27%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=170, last 2 years)
103.9 Points +93%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
62.5 Points +16%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
59.5 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=16)
58.8 Points +9%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
53.8 Points
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
48.63 Points -10%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=154, last 2 years)
104.4 runs/min +63%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
64.2 runs/min 0%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chome 75)
64.1 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=15)
62 runs/min -3%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)
61.5 runs/min -4%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
58.7 runs/min -8%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)
161 Points +50%
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 304, n=119, last 2 years)
131 Points +22%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
111 Points +4%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
107 Points
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
106 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=20)
105.2 Points -2%
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)
97 Points -9%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
90 Points -16%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)
42897 Points +80%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=205, last 2 years)
33314 Points +40%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
24730 Points +4%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
23830 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 33918, n=21)
23749 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
23318 Points -2%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
20714 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)
18697 Points -22%
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)
16720 Points -30%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)
2484 ms * -22%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)
2240 ms * -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=19)
2147 ms * -5%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
2095 ms * -3%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
2040 ms * -0%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
2036 ms *
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
1965 ms * +3%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=168, last 2 years)
1658 ms * +19%
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)
610 ms * +70%

* ... smaller is better

LG G8s ThinQSony Xperia 1LG G7 ThinQOnePlus 7 ProSamsung Galaxy S10eHuawei P30Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
1%
52%
4%
109%
76%
365%
Sequential Read 256KB
791
750
-5%
695
-12%
1468
86%
792
0%
909
15%
760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113)
-4%
1471 ?(215 - 4512, n=213, last 2 years)
86%
Sequential Write 256KB
182.4
206.9
13%
176.4
-3%
387
112%
194.1
6%
186
2%
297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113)
63%
1084 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=213, last 2 years)
494%
Random Read 4KB
138
147.3
7%
110.5
-20%
174.1
26%
136.9
-1%
138.8
1%
152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113)
11%
243 ?(22.2 - 543, n=213, last 2 years)
76%
Random Write 4KB
29.6
24.16
-18%
23.26
-21%
24.8
-16%
24.1
-19%
195.3
560%
131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113)
345%
267 ?(13 - 709, n=213, last 2 years)
802%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
67.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
31.34 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-54%
84.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
25%
73.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
82.8 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
23%
76 ?(13.4 - 88.3, n=43)
13%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
46.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
27.84 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-40%
62.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
34%
60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
30%
71.3 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
53%
59.6 ?(8.4 - 72.4, n=43)
28%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
LG G8s ThinQ; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.6.3a: Ø28.1 (26-30)
LG G8s ThinQ; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.6.3a: Ø27.9 (24-30)
LG G8s ThinQ; Arena of Valor; min; 1.29.1.2: Ø60.1 (59-61)
LG G8s ThinQ; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.29.1.2: Ø60.1 (53-61)
Carga Máxima
 37.6 °C36 °C33.6 °C 
 37.6 °C36.7 °C34.4 °C 
 38 °C36.7 °C33.5 °C 
Máximo: 38 °C
Médio: 36 °C
31.2 °C35.7 °C37.1 °C
32.2 °C36.4 °C37.6 °C
32.4 °C36 °C38.4 °C
Máximo: 38.4 °C
Médio: 35.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  39.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.944.52543.644.33138.335.24038.337.55041.2406334.134.4802733.410028.638.412527.942.416026.146.620025.148.92502252.831520.557.540020.563.450020.66563018.667.780018.171.5100018.574.4125017.972.6160018.676.4200017.874.9250017.572.6315016.971.2400016.868.450001764.263001764.2800017.264.81000017.168.41250017.164.51600017.352.6SPL59.868.578.865.174.766.430.383.6N13.222.142.119.134.418.71.455.5median 18.1median 64.8median 60.5median 42.1median 54.5median 42.6median 15.9median 69.5Delta3.88.418.42320.123.814.414.135.239.832.941.837.237.531.735.839.638.728.329.827.330.126.924.926.729.12429.620.934.320.94019.540.118.547.217.559.717.561.215.765.515.864.716.66815.869.115.471.115.569.4167315.876.81668.816.37116.375.916.261.916.455.716.449.628.683.21.153.2median 16.4median 61.92.211.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLG G8s ThinQLG G7 ThinQ
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
LG G8s ThinQ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

LG G7 ThinQ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.6 / 2 Watt
Carga midlight 5 / 10 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Apple iPhone XR
2942 mAh
Sony Xperia 1
3330 mAh
LG G7 ThinQ
3000 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10e
3100 mAh
Huawei P30
3650 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
1%
17%
0%
-5%
19%
4%
11%
13%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
0.61
49%
1
17%
1.16
3%
0.9
25%
0.6
50%
0.69
42%
0.939 ?(0.58 - 1.96, n=19)
22%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=161, last 2 years)
25%
Idle Average *
1.6
2.67
-67%
1.48
7%
1.98
-24%
1.8
-13%
1.2
25%
2.41
-51%
1.506 ?(0.85 - 2.8, n=19)
6%
1.447 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=161, last 2 years)
10%
Idle Maximum *
2
2.69
-35%
1.56
22%
2.07
-4%
2.9
-45%
1.5
25%
2.51
-26%
1.799 ?(1 - 2.9, n=19)
10%
1.628 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=161, last 2 years)
19%
Load Average *
5
4.34
13%
3.76
25%
4.51
10%
5.5
-10%
5.2
-4%
3.86
23%
4.61 ?(3.64 - 5.8, n=19)
8%
5.48 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=161, last 2 years)
-10%
Load Maximum *
10
5.66
43%
8.48
15%
8.3
17%
8.2
18%
10.2
-2%
6.96
30%
9.04 ?(7.49 - 11.9, n=19)
10%
8.14 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=161, last 2 years)
19%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
28h 9min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 33min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 23min
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Apple iPhone XR
2942 mAh
Sony Xperia 1
3330 mAh
LG G7 ThinQ
3000 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10e
3100 mAh
Huawei P30
3650 mAh
Battery Runtime
44%
-14%
8%
9%
-21%
14%
Reader / Idle
1689
2969
76%
1067
-37%
1662
-2%
1745
3%
1185
-30%
1914
13%
H.264
753
1011
34%
712
-5%
908
21%
802
7%
795
6%
1050
39%
WiFi v1.3
693
910
31%
441
-36%
591
-15%
768
11%
416
-40%
715
3%
Load
203
270
33%
246
21%
260
28%
236
16%
164
-19%
208
2%

Pro

+ GPS preciso
+ Sensor de digitais veloz
+ Tela táctil precisa
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Bons alto falantes estéreo

Contra

- Entalhe massivo
- Desempenho pobre da câmera com pouca luz
- Alto consumo de energia sob carga
- Afogamento da CPU
The LG G8S ThinQ smartphone review. Test device courtesy of LG Germany.
The LG G8S ThinQ smartphone review. Test device courtesy of LG Germany.

O LG G8 ThinQ é um smartphone intrigante. Seus gestos de movimento de ar oferecem um vislumbre do futuro e podem fornecer maneiras alternativas inovadoras de controlar o dispositivo à medida que o software amadurece. Da mesma forma, seus gestos de movimento de ar podem facilitar a captura de fotos. No entanto, atualmente é mais um belo truque que você poderia mostrar aos seus amigos e familiares. Com isso dito, um mago deve estudar seus truques de mágica bem, dado que os gestos de movimento de ar são muitas vezes difíceis de acertar.

No entanto LG G8S ThinQ não conta com apenas um truque. Tem navegação excelente e precisa, enquanto também faz bom uso do seu SoC Snapdragon 855. Gostamos que o dispositivo permaneça frio sob uso intenso contínuo, embora o consumo de energia seja maior do que gostaríamos. Além disso, o G8S ThinQ tem câmeras decentes, uma tela impressionante e uma bateria sólida. Além disso, os alto-falantes estéreo oferecem um bom som, enquanto o Wi-Fi e o sensor de digitais são rápidos. A inclusão de um conector para fones de ouvido e armazenamento expansível também é uma raridade para os carros-chefes de 2019.

As desvantagens? Bem, a câmera traseira tem um desempenho com pouca luz abaixo do esperado, o SoC se afoga sob uso intenso e já mencionamos o alto consumo de energia sob carga. No entanto, essas são as nossas únicas queixas principais sobre o G8S ThinQ. Você também pode comprar smartphones com armazenamento e Wi-Fi mais rápidos, mas a diferença real é mínima.

Os recursos inovadores do ToF são atualmente um tanto enigmáticos, mas o LG G8S ThinQ faz o básico certo e é um excelente smartphone topo de gama.

O grande entalhe também poderia assustar alguns compradores, mas isso é uma praga que atualmente aflige muitos carros-chefe modernos. Em suma, o LG G8S ThinQ é uma alternativa decente para a ordem estabelecida, especialmente porque os preços já começaram a cair.

LG G8s ThinQ - 08/31/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
97%
Conectividade
53 / 70 → 76%
Peso
90%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
44 / 64 → 68%
Desempenho da aplicação
74 / 86 → 86%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 86%
Camera
79%
Médio
79%
86%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone LG G8S ThinQ: Inovador ou desatualizado?
Florian Schmitt, 2019-07-15 (Update: 2019-07-16)