Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A90 5G - Recortando esquinas pelo 5G

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 12/12/2019

Internet super rápida para todos? A visão do Samsung Galaxy A90 5G é tornar os smartphones habilitados para 5G mais baratos. Com um preço sugerido de 749 Euros (~US$ 831), está longe de ser um smartphone econômico. Em nossa análise, determinamos se o preço é ou não justificado.

Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Memória
6144 MB 
Pantalha
6.7 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Super AMOLED, Entalhe em forma de gota, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, , 115 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD de até 512GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.4 x 164.8 x 76.4
Bateria
4500 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​2.0, phase detection AF, LED flash, Video @2160p/​30FPS, rotable (camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, depth of field (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB type-C, headset, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value: 0,377W/​kg (head), 1,547W/​kg (body); Download LTE: up to 2 Gbit/s, Upload LTE: up to 316 Mbit/s; Download 5G: up to 5 Gbit/s , fanless
peso
206 g, Suprimento de energia: 72 g
Preço
749 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

RatingDateModelWeightDriveSizeResolutionBest Price
84%12/2019Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
855, Adreno 640
206 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"2400x1080
87%09/2019Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g64 GB SSD6.1"1792x828
87%07/2019Samsung Galaxy A80
730, Adreno 618
220 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.7"2400x1080
87%11/2019OnePlus 7T Pro
855+, Adreno 640
206 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"3120x1440
86%12/2019Google Pixel 4
855, Adreno 640
162 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash5.7"2280x1080
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G

Size Comparison

165.2 mm 76.5 mm 9.3 mm 220 g164.8 mm 76.4 mm 8.4 mm 206 g162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g147.1 mm 68.8 mm 8.2 mm 162 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (min: 490, max: 597) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
526 (min: 413, max: 655) MBit/s ∼93% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
513 (min: 457, max: 532) MBit/s ∼91%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 347, max: 505) MBit/s ∼84% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
428 (min: 360, max: 501) MBit/s ∼76% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=479)
235 MBit/s ∼42% -54%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
591 (min: 564, max: 609) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (min: 204, max: 603) MBit/s ∼90% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
501 (min: 479, max: 554) MBit/s ∼85%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
352 (min: 311, max: 375) MBit/s ∼60% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Adreno 618, 730, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (min: 249, max: 327) MBit/s ∼48% -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 966, n=479)
222 MBit/s ∼38% -56%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø513 (457-532)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø501 (479-554)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Turn
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Turn
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Samsung Galaxy A90 – Overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy A90 – Overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy A90 – Turn
GPS Samsung Galaxy A90 – Turn
GPS Samsung Galaxy A90 – Bridge
GPS Samsung Galaxy A90 – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker Photo
24.7 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
47 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
20 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
23 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A90 5G: 32.58 ∆E min: 11.76 - max: 47.41 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
7.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A90 5G: 5.59 ∆E min: 1.37 - max: 11.85 ∆E
Test chart – perfectly illuminated
Test chart – perfectly illuminated
Test chart – 1 Lux
573
cd/m²
581
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
581
cd/m²
595
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
574
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 601 cd/m² Médio: 580.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.88 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 581 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.44 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
117.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.118
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1
Samsung Galaxy A80
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
OnePlus 7T Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Google Pixel 4
OLED, 2280x1080, 5.7
Screen
45%
12%
26%
32%
Brightness middle
581
679
17%
478
-18%
606
4%
447
-23%
Brightness
581
671
15%
486
-16%
611
5%
439
-24%
Brightness Distribution
94
93
-1%
96
2%
95
1%
93
-1%
Black Level *
0.68
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.44
0.8
85%
2.97
45%
3.46
36%
0.8
85%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
13.05
2.4
82%
10.18
22%
5.64
57%
1.4
89%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4
1.1
72%
2.5
37%
2
50%
1.3
67%
Gamma
2.118 104%
2.24 98%
2.031 108%
2.258 97%
2.22 99%
CCT
5882 111%
6610 98%
6533 99%
6779 96%
6213 105%
Contrast
999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 223 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 223 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 223 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13573 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2154 Points ∼89%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2430 Points ∼100% +13%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2081 Points ∼86% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1849 - 2154, n=7)
2032 Points ∼84% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3222, n=40)
1355 Points ∼56% -37%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2369 Points ∼87%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2716 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2218 - 2395, n=7)
2302 Points ∼85% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=46)
1803 Points ∼66% -24%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2733 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3463 Points ∼100% +27%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2940 Points ∼85% +8%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2494 Points ∼72% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2441 - 2852, n=8)
2616 Points ∼76% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=58)
1886 Points ∼54% -31%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
740 Points ∼55%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1343 Points ∼100% +81%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
792 Points ∼59% +7%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
725 Points ∼54% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (725 - 750, n=8)
742 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=58)
537 Points ∼40% -27%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10251 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
7177 Points ∼69% -30%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10442 Points ∼100% +2%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10254 Points ∼98% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8342 - 11440, n=17)
9650 Points ∼92% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=413)
5411 Points ∼52% -47%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
12747 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
8626 Points ∼68% -32%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
12645 Points ∼99% -1%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
12190 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10330 - 14439, n=17)
12152 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=577)
5882 Points ∼46% -54%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3308 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2708 Points ∼76% -18%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3564 Points ∼100% +8%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3044 Points ∼85% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2104 - 3365, n=17)
3013 Points ∼85% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=87)
2660 Points ∼75% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5703 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2160 Points ∼33% -62%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6527 Points ∼100% +14%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5228 Points ∼80% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4236 - 5884, n=17)
5596 Points ∼86% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=87)
2655 Points ∼41% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4913 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2262 Points ∼41% -54%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5509 Points ∼100% +12%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4509 Points ∼82% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3800 - 5012, n=17)
4688 Points ∼85% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=87)
2439 Points ∼44% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4576 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3219 Points ∼69% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3160 Points ∼67% -31%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4683 Points ∼100% +2%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4112 Points ∼88% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1934 - 4576, n=17)
3845 Points ∼82% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=421)
2010 Points ∼43% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6990 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8119 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2438 Points ∼30% -65%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8006 Points ∼99% +15%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6383 Points ∼79% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5184 - 7115, n=17)
6772 Points ∼83% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=421)
1808 Points ∼22% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6257 Points ∼90%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6067 Points ∼88% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2568 Points ∼37% -59%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6916 Points ∼100% +11%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5685 Points ∼82% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3969 - 6312, n=17)
5759 Points ∼83% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=422)
1684 Points ∼24% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4119 Points ∼89%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3411 Points ∼74% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3025 Points ∼66% -27%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4604 Points ∼100% +12%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4072 Points ∼88% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2345 - 4703, n=16)
3824 Points ∼83% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=449)
1918 Points ∼42% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10024 Points ∼56%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
17853 Points ∼100% +78%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3635 Points ∼20% -64%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11448 Points ∼64% +14%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9217 Points ∼52% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6358 - 10420, n=16)
9490 Points ∼53% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=449)
2415 Points ∼14% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7602 Points ∼83%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
9199 Points ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3479 Points ∼38% -54%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8605 Points ∼94% +13%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7196 Points ∼78% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5268 - 8141, n=16)
7096 Points ∼77% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=449)
2036 Points ∼22% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4374 Points ∼97%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2429 Points ∼54% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3215 Points ∼71% -26%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4519 Points ∼100% +3%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4199 Points ∼93% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2705 - 4429, n=17)
3918 Points ∼87% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4909, n=501)
1916 Points ∼42% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6231 Points ∼88%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5726 Points ∼81% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2244 Points ∼32% -64%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7044 Points ∼100% +13%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6214 Points ∼88% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5663 - 6362, n=17)
6242 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=501)
1503 Points ∼21% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5694 Points ∼91%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4400 Points ∼70% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
2405 Points ∼38% -58%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6266 Points ∼100% +10%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5615 Points ∼90% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4556 - 5747, n=17)
5498 Points ∼88% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=502)
1450 Points ∼23% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4231 Points ∼93%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3211 Points ∼71% -24%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4503 Points ∼99% +6%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4540 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3001 - 4540, n=16)
3864 Points ∼85% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=541)
1779 Points ∼39% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9703 Points ∼91%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3478 Points ∼33% -64%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10637 Points ∼100% +10%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8765 Points ∼82% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6122 - 10008, n=16)
9255 Points ∼87% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=540)
1976 Points ∼19% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7537 Points ∼92%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3415 Points ∼42% -55%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8165 Points ∼100% +8%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7263 Points ∼89% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5251 - 7820, n=16)
7039 Points ∼86% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=543)
1710 Points ∼21% -77%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
39293 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33864 Points ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
19389 Points ∼49% -51%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
30561 Points ∼78% -22%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37641 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (20636 - 45072, n=16)
31794 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=701)
14394 Points ∼37% -63%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
105631 Points ∼50%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
209204 Points ∼100% +98%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
51091 Points ∼24% -52%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
118129 Points ∼56% +12%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
102168 Points ∼49% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (97354 - 110432, n=15)
105649 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=699)
22589 Points ∼11% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
76813 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
97276 Points ∼100% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
37475 Points ∼39% -51%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
72173 Points ∼74% -6%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
73984 Points ∼76% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (55771 - 83518, n=15)
68785 Points ∼71% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=699)
18255 Points ∼19% -76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
118 fps ∼37%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
322 fps ∼100% +173%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
84 fps ∼26% -29%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼57% +57%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
139 fps ∼43% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (85 - 167, n=18)
153 fps ∼48% +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=714)
38.7 fps ∼12% -67%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼68%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
59 fps ∼67% -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
88 fps ∼100% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (59 - 91, n=18)
63.8 fps ∼73% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=723)
28.5 fps ∼32% -52%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
88 fps ∼50%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
175 fps ∼100% +99%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
42 fps ∼24% -52%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
111 fps ∼63% +26%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
75 fps ∼43% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (50 - 102, n=18)
92.5 fps ∼53% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=619)
22.4 fps ∼13% -75%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼90%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼90% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
36 fps ∼54% -40%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼85% -5%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
67 fps ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (51 - 85, n=18)
60.3 fps ∼90% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=628)
19.7 fps ∼29% -67%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼59%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
117 fps ∼100% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼26% -57%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼68% +14%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼49% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (35 - 71, n=18)
62.1 fps ∼53% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=484)
18.2 fps ∼16% -74%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼95%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
26 fps ∼43% -54%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
40 fps ∼67% -30%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼85% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (36 - 58, n=18)
48.3 fps ∼81% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=486)
17 fps ∼28% -70%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼40%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +150%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼17% -58%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼28% -29%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼40% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (14 - 26, n=17)
21.7 fps ∼36% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=211)
9.95 fps ∼17% -59%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼48%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +106%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6.8 fps ∼21% -57%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
19 fps ∼58% +19%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
13 fps ∼39% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8.5 - 24, n=18)
16.5 fps ∼50% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=210)
6.89 fps ∼21% -57%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼62%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +62%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼27% -57%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼43% -30%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps ∼55% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 38, n=17)
33.8 fps ∼56% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=215)
14.7 fps ∼25% -60%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼47%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
87 fps ∼100% +112%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼21% -56%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼54% +15%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32 fps ∼37% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 43, n=18)
40.3 fps ∼46% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=215)
16.4 fps ∼19% -60%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼56%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
73 fps ∼100% +78%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼23% -59%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
48 fps ∼66% +17%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
34 fps ∼47% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 42, n=18)
39.4 fps ∼54% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=409)
12.4 fps ∼17% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼60%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +67%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼25% -58%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼40% -33%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30 fps ∼50% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (21 - 41, n=18)
32.3 fps ∼54% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=413)
11.1 fps ∼19% -69%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1454 Points ∼91%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
1117 Points ∼70% -23%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1236 Points ∼77% -15%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1601 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1076 - 1601, n=17)
1344 Points ∼84% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=650)
767 Points ∼48% -47%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9264 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3855 Points ∼36% -58%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10618 Points ∼100% +15%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9307 Points ∼88% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8125 - 9510, n=17)
9197 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=650)
2126 Points ∼20% -77%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4996 Points ∼77%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3435 Points ∼53% -31%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5091 Points ∼79% +2%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6458 Points ∼100% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2661 - 7500, n=17)
5010 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=650)
1571 Points ∼24% -69%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8670 Points ∼93%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
6484 Points ∼70% -25%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9294 Points ∼100% +7%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8058 Points ∼87% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5993 - 9143, n=17)
8548 Points ∼92% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=650)
3061 Points ∼33% -65%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4915 Points ∼93%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 8192
3129 Points ∼59% -36%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4992 Points ∼95% +2%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5277 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3847 - 5397, n=17)
4768 Points ∼90% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=650)
1535 Points ∼29% -69%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69801 Points ∼89%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
78191 Points ∼100% +12%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51228 Points ∼66% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (51228 - 72343, n=6)
62647 Points ∼80% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 82947, n=35)
42935 Points ∼55% -38%
MEM (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
71045 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
64026 Points ∼90% -10%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
52596 Points ∼74% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (52596 - 71045, n=6)
59887 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (24176 - 100390, n=35)
49142 Points ∼69% -31%
GPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
166593 Points ∼84%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
199051 Points ∼100% +19%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
158097 Points ∼79% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (158097 - 175532, n=6)
168202 Points ∼85% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5938 - 209164, n=35)
86043 Points ∼43% -48%
CPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
131120 Points ∼90%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
145386 Points ∼100% +11%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
114777 Points ∼79% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (114777 - 140166, n=6)
134137 Points ∼92% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40620 - 168185, n=35)
92147 Points ∼63% -30%
Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
438559 Points ∼90%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
486654 Points ∼100% +11%
Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
376698 Points ∼77% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (376698 - 450074, n=6)
424873 Points ∼87% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 534558, n=35)
270267 Points ∼56% -38%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.886 Points ∼100% +106%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (Chrome 78)
64.578 Points ∼49%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
62.417 Points ∼47% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=15)
58.4 Points ∼44% -10%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
56.678 Points ∼43% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
40.021 Points ∼30% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=118)
36.3 Points ∼27% -44%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.36 Points ∼100% +158%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
115.44 Points ∼39% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (Chrome 78)
113.78 Points ∼39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90.8 - 120, n=15)
110 Points ∼37% -3%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
107.51 Points ∼37% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
77.376 Points ∼26% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=547)
42.7 Points ∼15% -62%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min ∼100% +137%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78)
66.4 runs/min ∼42% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (Chrome 78)
66.2 runs/min ∼42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=14)
62 runs/min ∼39% -6%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
61.8 runs/min ∼39% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=106)
40 runs/min ∼25% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chome 75)
38.9 runs/min ∼25% -41%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points ∼100% +92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=18)
106 Points ∼58% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (Chrome 78)
96 Points ∼52%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
94 Points ∼51% -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
93 Points ∼51% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
77 Points ∼42% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=179)
67.4 Points ∼37% -30%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points ∼100% +113%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
23999 Points ∼49% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25640, n=18)
23212 Points ∼48% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (Chrome 78)
22936 Points ∼47%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
22572 Points ∼46% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
16358 Points ∼34% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=708)
6954 Points ∼14% -70%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=733)
10398 ms * ∼100% -386%
Samsung Galaxy A80 (Chrome 75)
3027 ms * ∼29% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G (Chrome 78)
2139.4 ms * ∼21%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
2133.5 ms * ∼21% -0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=17)
2133 ms * ∼21% -0%
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78)
2072.2 ms * ∼20% +3%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572.8 ms * ∼6% +73%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A90 5GSamsung Galaxy A80OnePlus 7T ProGoogle Pixel 4Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-64%
-28%
-39%
-9%
-58%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.4 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
56.9 (54.5 - 59.4, n=2)
-4%
49.8 (1.7 - 87.1, n=450)
-16%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.1 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
72.8 (70.5 - 75.1, n=2)
-3%
68.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=450)
-9%
Random Write 4KB
168.5
21.6
-87%
26
-85%
146.64
-13%
123 (29.9 - 170, n=3)
-27%
24 (0.14 - 259, n=777)
-86%
Random Read 4KB
190.5
117.5
-38%
169
-11%
122.38
-36%
184 (170 - 192, n=3)
-3%
49.4 (1.59 - 226, n=777)
-74%
Sequential Write 256KB
522.3
190.4
-64%
405
-22%
247.73
-53%
421 (218 - 522, n=3)
-19%
101 (2.99 - 590, n=777)
-81%
Sequential Read 256KB
1418.4
501.5
-65%
1489
5%
655.4
-54%
1413 (1406 - 1418, n=3)
0%
283 (12.1 - 1781, n=777)
-80%
0102030405060Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.32.1.2: Ø59.7 (49-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.32.1.2: Ø59.8 (57-60)
; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.19.4: Ø59.7 (58-60)
; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.19.4: Ø59.6 (50-60)
Carga Máxima
 44.5 °C40.3 °C37.5 °C 
 44.7 °C40 °C37.3 °C 
 43.6 °C40.1 °C37.3 °C 
Máximo: 44.7 °C
Médio: 40.6 °C
33 °C37.6 °C39.7 °C
34.2 °C38.2 °C40.5 °C
35.1 °C38.5 °C40.1 °C
Máximo: 40.5 °C
Médio: 37.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  43.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204351.22536.842.33132.833.94033.734.85040.136.26331.330.48024.725.810025.624.412522.124.516019.924.520019.333.525017.241.931517.448.240017.150.850017.352.96301556.78001560.4100018.666.3125014.570.2160015.769.9200014.470.1250014.469.6315014.170400014.268.2500014.359.9630014.566.2800014.5681000014.566.61250014.559.21600014.741.9SPL62.464.460.727.579.8N15.51612.9142.9median 15median 59.9Delta1.513.143.948.443.64238.338.638.342.441.245.934.139.82730.128.629.627.929.226.132.225.141.72249.420.557.420.561.820.664.418.666.718.170.718.575.117.972.318.674.817.873.817.573.516.970.616.863.51768.81778.117.273.417.166.817.154.917.360.965.174.766.430.384.719.134.418.71.460.5median 18.1median 66.72.711.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A90 5GSamsung Galaxy A80
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A80 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.6 / 0.9 / 1.4 Watt
Carga midlight 4.5 / 9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Google Pixel 4
2800 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-59%
-5%
-129%
-34%
-33%
-28%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.56
7%
0.6
-0%
2.1
-250%
1.01
-68%
0.967 (0.6 - 1.96, n=17)
-61%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=800)
-47%
Idle Average *
0.9
2.99
-232%
1.2
-33%
3
-233%
1.63
-81%
1.519 (0.85 - 2.8, n=17)
-69%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=799)
-93%
Idle Maximum *
1.4
3.02
-116%
1.4
-0%
3.5
-150%
1.69
-21%
1.841 (1 - 2.9, n=17)
-32%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=800)
-45%
Load Average *
4.5
4.17
7%
5
-11%
5.3
-18%
4.67
-4%
4.6 (3.64 - 5.8, n=17)
-2%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=794)
10%
Load Maximum *
9
5.44
40%
7.1
21%
8.3
8%
8.78
2%
9.1 (7.49 - 11.9, n=17)
-1%
5.94 (1.2 - 14.2, n=794)
34%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
35h 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 27min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 58min
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A80
3700 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Google Pixel 4
2800 mAh
Battery Runtime
7%
-21%
-5%
-45%
Reader / Idle
2156
2765
28%
1796
-17%
2015
-7%
1007
-53%
H.264
987
1147
16%
902
-9%
957
-3%
617
-37%
WiFi v1.3
946
866
-8%
713
-25%
912
-4%
460
-51%
Load
298
267
-10%
200
-33%
283
-5%
185
-38%

Pro

+ Smartphone 5G relativamente barato
+ GPS relativamente preciso
+ Armazenamento veloz
+ Leitor de cartões MicroSD
+ Tela brilhante
+ Bom nível de desempenho
+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Sem Wi-Fi 6
- Alto-falantes medíocres
- Sem tela HDR
- Desenvolvimento significativo de calor sob carga e afogamento
- Qualidade média das chamadas
- Câmera sem OIS ou zoom infinitamente variável

Veredicto - Bom Smartphone para fanáticos do 5G

In review: Samsung Galaxy A90 5G. Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany
In review: Samsung Galaxy A90 5G. Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany

Atualmente, os usuários que desejam 5G a um bom preço precisam abrir mão de certos recursos. Este parece ser o principal insight da nossa análise do Samsung Galaxy A90 5G . Por outro lado, o dispositivo também oferece algumas vantagens em relação a outros smartphones de última geração, como uma duração de bateria particularmente longa, embora ainda não tenhamos sido capazes de determinar o impacto do módulo 5G a esse respeito e um leitor de cartão microSD.

Assim, o valor do Samsung A90 5G depende fortemente das preferências gerais de um usuário: A câmera, o alto-falante, a configuração da memória e o desempenho são medíocres para essa faixa de preço e detalhes ausentes como HDR, certificação IP ou carregamento sem fio, também podem deixar alguns usuários insatisfeitos.

O Samsung Galaxy A90 5G é um smartphone 5G sólido com um conjunto de recursos ligeiramente reduzido.

No entanto, o Galaxy A90 5G é uma das maneiras mais baratas de aproveitar as redes 5G, além de usar as importações chinesas. Como o smartphone causa uma boa impressão geral e até oferece algumas vantagens exclusivas, podemos recomendá-lo aos fanáticos do 5G preocupados com o preço.

Samsung Galaxy A90 5G - 12/09/2019 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
79%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
48 / 70 → 69%
Peso
88%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
57 / 64 → 89%
Desempenho da aplicação
79 / 86 → 91%
Temperatura
87%
Ruído
100%
Audio
66 / 90 → 73%
Camera
69%
Médio
77%
84%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A90 5G - Recortando esquinas pelo 5G
Florian Schmitt, 2019-12-12 (Update: 2019-12-14)