Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J6 (2018)

Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/02/2018

A new member of the Galaxy family. O Samsung Galaxy J6 (2018) impressiona com a sua combinação de hardware sólido. O J6 (2018) possui uma tela de resolução super AMOLED HD + de 5,6 polegadas, dois slots SIM e uma CPU octa-core por 269 Euros (~$313). Descubra nesta análise se o J6 (2018) vale o seu preço.

Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Galaxy J Serie)
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T830 MP1
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
5.6 polegadas 18.5:9, 1480 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, Super AMOLED, Super AMOLED, 16 M colours, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.2 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Sensor de proximidade, sensor de digitais, Wi-Fi Direct, Samsung Smart Switch, USB OTG, VoLTE, VoWiFi
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz. UMTS: AWS 850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz. LTE Cat. 6: AWS, AWS-3, 700, 800, 850, 900, 1800, 1900, 2100, 2600 MHz. 300 Mb/s uplink, 50 MB/s downlink. Nano-SIM. SAR value: Head – 0.809 W/kg, Body – 1.568 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.2 x 149.3 x 70.2
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Ion, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 76 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 21 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 13 MP, f/1.9, 28 mm, LED flash, Autofocus (AF), Photos in up to 4,128 x 3,096 at 4:3. Videos in up to 1080p at 30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 8 MP, f/1.9, LED flash, Videos in up to 1080p at 30 FPS
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Cabo USB Type-A para Micro USB, modular 5V, Fonte de alimentação de 1A, fones, ferramenta SIM, Guia de início rápido, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
154 g, Suprimento de energia: 50 g
Preço
269 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
310 MBit/s ∼100% +608%
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s ∼100% +605%
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s ∼93% +560%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
278 MBit/s ∼90% +535%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=250)
187 MBit/s ∼60% +327%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.7 MBit/s ∼17% +23%
Huawei Honor 7X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46.4 MBit/s ∼15% +6%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
43.8 MBit/s ∼14%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
345 MBit/s ∼100% +679%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
311 MBit/s ∼90% +602%
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s ∼84% +552%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
281 MBit/s ∼81% +534%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=250)
182 MBit/s ∼53% +311%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼16% +26%
Huawei Honor 7X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47 MBit/s ∼14% +6%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
44.3 MBit/s ∼13%
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy J6 (2018) - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy J6 (2018) - Overview
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy J6 (2018) – Lake
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy J6 (2018) – Lake
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy J6 (2018) – Loop
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy J6 (2018) – Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
284
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 307 cd/m² Médio: 294.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 296 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
96.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.09
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
Super AMOLED, 1480x720, 5.6
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2
Sony Xperia XA2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei Honor 7X
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.93
Nokia 6 2018
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-46%
61%
20%
-44%
14%
-55%
Brightness middle
296
456
54%
761
157%
448
51%
513
73%
533.2
80%
417
41%
Brightness
294
455
55%
723
146%
451
53%
506
72%
511
74%
421
43%
Brightness Distribution
93
85
-9%
90
-3%
91
-2%
93
0%
88
-5%
88
-5%
Black Level *
0.69
0.42
0.35
0.61
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.8
5.6
-100%
2.4
14%
2.7
4%
5
-79%
2.83
-1%
6.1
-118%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.8
11.1
-13%
5.2
47%
9.8
-0%
11.4
-16%
6.72
31%
11.2
-14%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.9
6.9
-263%
1.8
5%
1.6
16%
7.8
-311%
3.7
-95%
7.1
-274%
Gamma
2.09 115%
2.3 104%
2.21 109%
2.06 117%
2.2 109%
1.9 126%
2.16 111%
CCT
6398 102%
7883 82%
6312 103%
6557 99%
7964 82%
6918 94%
8362 78%
Contrast
1103
1221
1523
684

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8821 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
47274 Points ∼65%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
66045 Points ∼91% +40%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
71635 Points ∼99% +52%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
45613 Points ∼63% -4%
Sony Xperia XA2
71552 Points ∼99% +51%
Huawei Honor 7X
62810 Points ∼87% +33%
Nokia 6 2018
72580 Points ∼100% +54%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (44191 - 47339, n=8)
45944 Points ∼63% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=347)
70029 Points ∼96% +48%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
62758 Points ∼61%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
81789 Points ∼80% +30%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
90347 Points ∼88% +44%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
61825 Points ∼60% -1%
Sony Xperia XA2
89228 Points ∼87% +42%
Huawei Honor 7X
81992 Points ∼80% +31%
Nokia 6 2018
90435 Points ∼88% +44%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (61794 - 62758, n=4)
62047 Points ∼61% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (25692 - 290397, n=115)
102443 Points ∼100% +63%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
3833 Points ∼69%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
5558 Points ∼100% +45%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
4875 Points ∼88% +27%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3889 Points ∼70% +1%
Sony Xperia XA2
5006 Points ∼90% +31%
Huawei Honor 7X
4859 Points ∼87% +27%
Nokia 6 2018
4719 Points ∼85% +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3722 - 3889, n=6)
3800 Points ∼68% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2399 - 8601, n=203)
4444 Points ∼80% +16%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
4731 Points ∼60%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
7846 Points ∼100% +66%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5712 Points ∼73% +21%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
5006 Points ∼64% +6%
Sony Xperia XA2
5844 Points ∼74% +24%
Huawei Honor 7X
6213 Points ∼79% +31%
Nokia 6 2018
5484 Points ∼70% +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3691 - 5006, n=8)
4746 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2516 - 10264, n=367)
4676 Points ∼60% -1%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
795 Points ∼86%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
828 Points ∼90% +4%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
925 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
737 Points ∼80% -7%
Sony Xperia XA2
921 Points ∼100% +16%
Huawei Honor 7X
724 Points ∼78% -9%
Nokia 6 2018
895 Points ∼97% +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (10 - 795, n=8)
618 Points ∼67% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=443)
671 Points ∼73% -16%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
534 Points ∼35%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
1026 Points ∼67% +92%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1523 Points ∼100% +185%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
534 Points ∼35% 0%
Sony Xperia XA2
1500 Points ∼98% +181%
Huawei Honor 7X
845 Points ∼55% +58%
Nokia 6 2018
1520 Points ∼100% +185%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (511 - 534, n=8)
527 Points ∼35% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=443)
1501 Points ∼99% +181%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
1086 Points ∼61%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
1108 Points ∼62% +2%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1213 Points ∼68% +12%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1249 Points ∼70% +15%
Sony Xperia XA2
1328 Points ∼74% +22%
Huawei Honor 7X
1788 Points ∼100% +65%
Nokia 6 2018
1161 Points ∼65% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1086 - 1362, n=8)
1231 Points ∼69% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=443)
1123 Points ∼63% +3%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
2208 Points ∼68%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
3261 Points ∼100% +48%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3249 Points ∼100% +47%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
2218 Points ∼68% 0%
Sony Xperia XA2
3256 Points ∼100% +47%
Huawei Honor 7X
2899 Points ∼89% +31%
Nokia 6 2018
3237 Points ∼99% +47%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (2127 - 2368, n=8)
2236 Points ∼69% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=443)
2243 Points ∼69% +2%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
1004 Points ∼64%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
1323 Points ∼85% +32%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1535 Points ∼98% +53%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1022 Points ∼65% +2%
Sony Xperia XA2
1563 Points ∼100% +56%
Huawei Honor 7X
1334 Points ∼85% +33%
Nokia 6 2018
1504 Points ∼96% +50%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (353 - 1022, n=8)
920 Points ∼59% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=446)
1133 Points ∼72% +13%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
3186 Points ∼84%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3763 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
2332 Points ∼61%
Huawei Honor 7X
2772 Points ∼73%
Nokia 6 2018
3690 Points ∼97%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (2332 - 2371, n=3)
2357 Points ∼62%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14362, n=140)
3809 Points ∼100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
3709 Points ∼86%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
4320 Points ∼100% +16%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
4011 Points ∼93% +8%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3704 Points ∼86% 0%
Sony Xperia XA2
4170 Points ∼97% +12%
Huawei Honor 7X
3342 Points ∼77% -10%
Nokia 6 2018
883 Points ∼20% -76%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3704 - 3777, n=5)
3728 Points ∼86% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 10558, n=187)
3956 Points ∼92% +7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
732 Points ∼17%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
875 Points ∼21% +20%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
822 Points ∼20% +12%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
732 Points ∼17% 0%
Sony Xperia XA2
865 Points ∼21% +18%
Huawei Honor 7X
869 Points ∼21% +19%
Nokia 6 2018
4210 Points ∼100% +475%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (726 - 736, n=5)
732 Points ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=188)
1170 Points ∼28% +60%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
1735 Points ∼80%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
2177 Points ∼100% +25%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1822 Points ∼84% +5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1727 Points ∼79% 0%
Sony Xperia XA2
1631 Points ∼75% -6%
Huawei Honor 7X
1553 Points ∼71% -10%
Nokia 6 2018
1738 Points ∼80% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1522 - 1735, n=8)
1676 Points ∼77% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1765 - 3669, n=292)
1549 Points ∼71% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
202 Points ∼19%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
381 Points ∼36% +89%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
721 Points ∼69% +257%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
185 Points ∼18% -8%
Sony Xperia XA2
709 Points ∼67% +251%
Huawei Honor 7X
338 Points ∼32% +67%
Nokia 6 2018
707 Points ∼67% +250%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (185 - 253, n=8)
221 Points ∼21% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (721 - 5220, n=292)
1051 Points ∼100% +420%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
251 Points ∼25%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
467 Points ∼46% +86%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
833 Points ∼83% +232%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
231 Points ∼23% -8%
Sony Xperia XA2
811 Points ∼80% +223%
Huawei Honor 7X
409 Points ∼41% +63%
Nokia 6 2018
814 Points ∼81% +224%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (231 - 312, n=8)
274 Points ∼27% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 4732, n=300)
1008 Points ∼100% +302%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
1694 Points ∼79%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
2157 Points ∼100% +27%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1802 Points ∼84% +6%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1685 Points ∼78% -1%
Sony Xperia XA2
1737 Points ∼81% +3%
Huawei Honor 7X
1656 Points ∼77% -2%
Nokia 6 2018
1733 Points ∼80% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1522 - 1705, n=8)
1648 Points ∼76% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (524 - 3642, n=323)
1453 Points ∼67% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
244 Points ∼17%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
743 Points ∼52% +205%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1258 Points ∼89% +416%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
277 Points ∼19% +14%
Sony Xperia XA2
1251 Points ∼88% +413%
Huawei Honor 7X
528 Points ∼37% +116%
Nokia 6 2018
1249 Points ∼88% +412%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (244 - 407, n=8)
331 Points ∼23% +36%
Average of class Smartphone (1257 - 8312, n=323)
1421 Points ∼100% +482%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
301 Points ∼22%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
870 Points ∼65% +189%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1348 Points ∼100% +348%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
340 Points ∼25% +13%
Sony Xperia XA2
1334 Points ∼99% +343%
Huawei Honor 7X
622 Points ∼46% +107%
Nokia 6 2018
1332 Points ∼99% +343%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (301 - 490, n=8)
402 Points ∼30% +34%
Average of class Smartphone (1344 - 6378, n=331)
1224 Points ∼91% +307%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
12566 Points ∼78%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
16146 Points ∼100% +28%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
12845 Points ∼80% +2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
12605 Points ∼78% 0%
Sony Xperia XA2
13112 Points ∼81% +4%
Huawei Honor 7X
13372 Points ∼83% +6%
Nokia 6 2018
13196 Points ∼82% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (6184 - 12955, n=8)
11907 Points ∼74% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 36494, n=478)
12142 Points ∼75% -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
7007 Points ∼38%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
13491 Points ∼73% +93%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
18449 Points ∼99% +163%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
7484 Points ∼40% +7%
Sony Xperia XA2
18534 Points ∼100% +165%
Huawei Honor 7X
10332 Points ∼56% +47%
Nokia 6 2018
18572 Points ∼100% +165%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (5376 - 7793, n=8)
7092 Points ∼38% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=478)
15567 Points ∼84% +122%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
7771 Points ∼46%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
14003 Points ∼82% +80%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
16818 Points ∼99% +116%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
8227 Points ∼48% +6%
Sony Xperia XA2
16974 Points ∼100% +118%
Huawei Honor 7X
10882 Points ∼64% +40%
Nokia 6 2018
17030 Points ∼100% +119%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (5537 - 8550, n=8)
7787 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=479)
13461 Points ∼79% +73%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
12 fps ∼40%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
23 fps ∼77% +92%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
30 fps ∼100% +150%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
12 fps ∼40% 0%
Sony Xperia XA2
30 fps ∼100% +150%
Huawei Honor 7X
19 fps ∼63% +58%
Nokia 6 2018
30 fps ∼100% +150%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (12 - 12, n=8)
12 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=504)
26.9 fps ∼90% +124%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
19 fps ∼61%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
22 fps ∼71% +16%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
28 fps ∼90% +47%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
20 fps ∼65% +5%
Sony Xperia XA2
31 fps ∼100% +63%
Huawei Honor 7X
18 fps ∼58% -5%
Nokia 6 2018
31 fps ∼100% +63%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (11 - 20, n=8)
17.3 fps ∼56% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=507)
23.5 fps ∼76% +24%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
5.4 fps ∼38%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
9.9 fps ∼69% +83%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
14 fps ∼98% +159%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
5.1 fps ∼36% -6%
Sony Xperia XA2
14 fps ∼98% +159%
Huawei Honor 7X
8 fps ∼56% +48%
Nokia 6 2018
14 fps ∼98% +159%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (4.9 - 5.4, n=8)
5.11 fps ∼36% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=427)
14.3 fps ∼100% +165%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
10 fps ∼67%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
9.5 fps ∼63% -5%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
13 fps ∼87% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
10 fps ∼67% 0%
Sony Xperia XA2
15 fps ∼100% +50%
Huawei Honor 7X
7.9 fps ∼53% -21%
Nokia 6 2018
15 fps ∼100% +50%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (4.5 - 10, n=8)
8.5 fps ∼57% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=429)
14.5 fps ∼97% +45%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
3.2 fps ∼26%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
6.4 fps ∼51% +100%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
9.8 fps ∼78% +206%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3.2 fps ∼26% 0%
Sony Xperia XA2
9.7 fps ∼78% +203%
Huawei Honor 7X
4.7 fps ∼38% +47%
Nokia 6 2018
9.8 fps ∼78% +206%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1.7 - 3.3, n=8)
3.03 fps ∼24% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (9.7 - 60, n=290)
12.5 fps ∼100% +291%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
6.9 fps ∼55%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
6.5 fps ∼52% -6%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
9.4 fps ∼75% +36%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
7.4 fps ∼59% +7%
Sony Xperia XA2
10 fps ∼79% +45%
Huawei Honor 7X
4.5 fps ∼36% -35%
Nokia 6 2018
10 fps ∼79% +45%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (2.8 - 7.4, n=8)
6.05 fps ∼48% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 110, n=292)
12.6 fps ∼100% +83%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
2 fps ∼24%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
3.5 fps ∼41% +75%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5.6 fps ∼66% +180%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1.9 fps ∼22% -5%
Sony Xperia XA2
5.5 fps ∼65% +175%
Huawei Honor 7X
2.9 fps ∼34% +45%
Nokia 6 2018
5.6 fps ∼66% +180%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1.8 - 2, n=8)
1.913 fps ∼23% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (5.5 - 35, n=221)
8.45 fps ∼100% +323%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
4 fps ∼51%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
3.5 fps ∼45% -12%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5.3 fps ∼68% +33%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3.7 fps ∼48% -7%
Sony Xperia XA2
6 fps ∼77% +50%
Huawei Honor 7X
2.9 fps ∼37% -27%
Nokia 6 2018
5.9 fps ∼76% +48%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1.7 - 4, n=8)
3.31 fps ∼43% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (5.2 - 50, n=224)
7.78 fps ∼100% +95%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Honor 7X HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (11 - 224, n=362)
33.6 Points ∼100% +62%
Huawei Honor 7X (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
31.299 Points ∼93% +51%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
28.167 Points ∼84% +36%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
27.971 Points ∼83% +35%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64)
27.556 Points ∼82% +33%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
27.368 Points ∼81% +32%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
26.37 Points ∼78% +27%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (20.7 - 26.4, n=8)
23.9 Points ∼71% +15%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87)
20.745 Points ∼62%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei Honor 7X (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
5302 Points ∼100% +42%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
5011 Points ∼95% +35%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=498)
5005 Points ∼94% +35%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
4993 Points ∼94% +34%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
4968 Points ∼94% +34%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64)
4786 Points ∼90% +29%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
4771 Points ∼90% +28%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3721 - 4968, n=8)
4164 Points ∼79% +12%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87)
3721 Points ∼70%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87)
11916.4 ms * ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=517)
11893 ms * ∼100% -0%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
10235.7 ms * ∼86% +14%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
9922.7 ms * ∼83% +17%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
9796.9 ms * ∼82% +18%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64)
9564.3 ms * ∼80% +20%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (6784 - 11916, n=8)
9155 ms * ∼77% +23%
Huawei Honor 7X (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
8684.3 ms * ∼73% +27%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
6784.4 ms * ∼57% +43%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Nokia 6 2018
117 Points ∼100% +29%
Huawei Honor 7X (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
111 Points ∼95% +22%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
108 Points ∼92% +19%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
106 Points ∼91% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=246)
99.4 Points ∼85% +9%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87)
91 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
80 Points ∼68% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (64 - 91, n=8)
74.6 Points ∼64% -18%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy J6 2018Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KLMotorola Moto G6 PlusSamsung Galaxy J5 (2017) DuosSony Xperia XA2Huawei Honor 7XNokia 6 2018Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
19%
112%
-21%
22%
38%
19%
3%
-8%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
72.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
62.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
44.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-33%
64.75 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
30.55
-54%
61.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
45.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=97)
-30%
44 (3.4 - 87.1, n=280)
-33%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.88 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
83.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
72.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
86.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
52.65
-36%
83.42 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
65.2 (8.2 - 96.5, n=97)
-20%
62.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=280)
-24%
Random Write 4KB
12.37
12
-3%
62.76
407%
9.9
-20%
13.82
12%
20.24
64%
15.3
24%
17.5 (0.75 - 74.9, n=137)
41%
13.5 (0.14 - 164, n=556)
9%
Random Read 4KB
27.05
36.8
36%
58.39
116%
24.07
-11%
43.07
59%
81.4
201%
38.78
43%
34.3 (3.59 - 117, n=137)
27%
34.6 (1.59 - 173, n=556)
28%
Sequential Write 256KB
100.54
139.5
39%
216.09
115%
51.96
-48%
127.38
27%
127.87
27%
118.32
18%
92.5 (14.8 - 189, n=137)
-8%
72.5 (2.99 - 228, n=556)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB
206.49
269.3
30%
286.64
39%
204.45
-1%
271.46
31%
265.31
28%
272.59
32%
226 (25.8 - 440, n=137)
9%
212 (12.1 - 832, n=556)
3%
PUBG Mobile
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 Balanced10 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
comparado com
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (min)
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1
10
   ...
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2
13
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
 636, Adreno 509
25
   ...
OnePlus 6 (max)
 845, Adreno 630
40
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high60 fps
Carga Máxima
 31.7 °C31.5 °C30.2 °C 
 32.6 °C32.9 °C31.6 °C 
 32.9 °C31.8 °C31.5 °C 
Máximo: 32.9 °C
Médio: 31.9 °C
30.2 °C31.1 °C30.9 °C
29.8 °C30.8 °C33.6 °C
29.2 °C32.7 °C34.8 °C
Máximo: 34.8 °C
Médio: 31.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  27.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.933.72528.433.63136.129.34030.933.75030.6336322.226.78024.923.510024.430.612523.542.316020.341.820019.840.725018.244.531517.449.940016.656.650017.15963015.962.980015.966.2100015.966.9125016.765.416001670.7200015.973.1250016.272.2315016.478.640001772.1500016.567630016.468.7800016.670.4100001773.21250016.566.91600016.953.7SPL28.683.9N1.154median 16.6Samsung Galaxy J6 2018median 66.2Delta1.69.731.63225.438.425.33432.93033.629.631.628.528.429.32731.820.834.92243.421.349.120.855.521.260.719.463.719.567.417.770.217.971.417.868.917.37017.472.616.775.117.277.418.278.117.981.417.676.717.775.417.874.517.970.518.161.818.258.43086.81.370median 17.9Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duosmedian 701.39.535.239.232.937.437.23831.739.839.639.928.335.727.32926.931.726.732.42441.620.948.920.95419.554.718.563.317.564.717.567.315.768.315.873.616.675.215.873.815.472.415.570.21671.715.8771677.516.378.316.372.816.276.216.471.116.460.528.686.31.167median 16.4Motorola Moto G6 Plusmedian 70.22.19.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Motorola Moto G6 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.85 / 1.51 / 1.57 Watt
Carga midlight 4.21 / 5.88 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
3000 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Huawei Honor 7X
3340 mAh
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
30%
9%
39%
17%
-28%
9%
3%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
0.85
0.58
32%
0.5
41%
0.52
39%
0.39
54%
1.02
-20%
0.67
21%
0.71 (0.37 - 1.18, n=8)
16%
0.869 (0.2 - 3.4, n=583)
-2%
Idle Average *
1.51
1.31
13%
1.78
-18%
1.17
23%
1.61
-7%
2.46
-63%
1.76
-17%
1.909 (0.78 - 4.65, n=8)
-26%
1.698 (0.6 - 6.2, n=582)
-12%
Idle Maximum *
1.57
1.33
15%
1.81
-15%
1.24
21%
1.62
-3%
2.51
-60%
1.78
-13%
1.995 (0.84 - 4.74, n=8)
-27%
1.954 (0.74 - 6.6, n=583)
-24%
Load Average *
4.21
1.88
55%
3.3
22%
1.66
61%
3.12
26%
4.16
1%
2.82
33%
3.02 (1.52 - 5.75, n=8)
28%
3.98 (0.8 - 10.8, n=577)
5%
Load Maximum *
5.88
3.8
35%
5.14
13%
2.94
50%
4.92
16%
5.87
-0%
4.56
22%
4.42 (2.75 - 6.97, n=8)
25%
5.61 (1.2 - 14.2, n=577)
5%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
24h 55min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 29min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 57min
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
3000 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Huawei Honor 7X
3340 mAh
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-8%
5%
17%
20%
-22%
14%
Reader / Idle
1495
1846
23%
1564
5%
2503
67%
1111
-26%
1833
23%
H.264
869
542
-38%
917
6%
766
-12%
675
-22%
WiFi v1.3
708
654
-8%
702
-1%
738
4%
886
25%
664
-6%
942
33%
Load
297
404
36%
449
51%
298
0%
199
-33%
362
22%

Pro

+ Acabamento de alta qualidade
+ Dual SIM
+ Suporte para cartões microSD
+ Android Oreo 8.0
+ LTE Cat. 6
+ Suporte para muitas bandas de frequência
+ Módulo GPS preciso
+ Bom sensor de digitais
+ Tela brilhante
+ Reprodução de cor precisa
+ Duração da bateria impressionante

Contra

- Carcaça de plástico
- Sem resolução Full HD
- Micro-USB 2.0 em vez do USB-C
- Sem sensor de brilho
- PWM cintilante da tela
- Wi-Fi lento
- Nem todos os jogos rodam fluentemente
- Sem carga rápida
The Samsung Galaxy J6 (2018) in review.
The Samsung Galaxy J6 (2018) in review.

O Samsung Galaxy J6 (2018) é um bom smartphone de nível básico que tem deficiências em algumas áreas cruciais. A Samsung depende muito do peso de sua série Galaxy J, na medida em que recomendamos o Galaxy J5 (2017) do ano passado, sobre o J6 (2018).

O Samsung Galaxy J6 (2018) é um bom smartphone de nível básico, mas não se apresse em comprá-lo; o Galaxy J5 (2017) do ano passado oferece mais recursos pela metade do custo.

Existem muitas áreas nas quais o J6 (2018) é mais deficiente do que seu predecessor. Embora a carcaça seja bem trabalhada, é feita de plástico ao invés do alumínio que a Samsung usou no J5 (2017). Além disso, a Samsung removeu a conectividade Wi-Fi de 5 GHz entre gerações, descartou o brilho automático e usou sensores de câmera do J5 (2016). Todos esses erros dificultam o J6 (2018) no uso diário em comparação com seu antecessor.

Esses problemas tomam outras decisões, como a escolha do SoC, a falta de USB Type-C, a ausência do carregamento rápido e uma tela 720p, mais frustrante, ao considerar o que a concorrência oferece agora.

No entanto, o J6 (2018) faz algumas coisas bem. O dispositivo tem slots de cartão microSD e dual nano-SIM dedicados e ampla cobertura LTE; significativamente mais do que o J5 (2017). Da mesma forma, o J6 (2018) vem com o Android Oreo 8.0 e possui um módulo GPS preciso. Por fim, o dispositivo tem boa duração de bateria e sua tela Super AMOLED é brilhante e reproduz cores precisas.

Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 - 07/20/2018 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
84%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
34 / 60 → 57%
Peso
92%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
14 / 63 → 22%
Desempenho da aplicação
45 / 70 → 64%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
65%
Médio
72%
82%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J6 (2018)
Manuel Masiero, 2018-08- 2 (Update: 2018-08- 7)