Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Vivo X50 Pro - A câmera gimbal "revolucionária" faz alguma diferença?

Para mãos trêmulas. O destaque e ponto de venda exclusivo do Vivo X50 Pro é o seu sistema de câmera gimbal, que supostamente estabiliza as gravações de vídeo muito melhor do que um OIS tradicional. Descubra se a câmera tipo gimbal no mais recente smartphone da Vivo oferece um benefício real ou se não é nada além de marketing, em nossa análise.
5G Android Smartphone
Vivo X50 Pro (X Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 620
Memória
8 GB 
Pantalha
6.56 polegadas 19.8:9, 2376 x 1080 pixel 398 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 90 Hz
Disco rígido
256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 228 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor geomagnético, sensor de proximidade, acelerômetro, giroscópio, bússola, OTG, Miracast
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G: GSM850/900/1800/1900; 3G: WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8; 4G: FDD_LTEB1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20, TDD_LTEB38/B40/B41; 5G: NSA n41/n77/n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.04 x 158.46 x 72.8
Bateria
4315 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48MP (f/1.6) + 8 MP (f/3.4, 1/4.0") + 13MP (2x f/2.5, 1/2.8", 0.8µm) + 8 MP (f/2.2, 120˚, 16 mm, 1/4.0", 1.12µm)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.5, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Mono, Teclado: Virtual, Capa protetora, fones, fonte de alimentação modular, cabo USB, Funtouch OS 10.5, 12 Meses Garantia, Widevine L3, fanless
peso
181.5 g, Suprimento de energia: 93 g
Preço
600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Vergleichsgeräte

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.2 %
10/2020
Vivo X50 Pro
SD 765G, Adreno 620		181.5 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.56"2376x1080
87.8 %
06/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10
SD 865, Adreno 650		208 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
86.1 %
06/2020
Realme X50 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650		205 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.44"2400x1080
88.4 %
06/2020
OnePlus 8
SD 865, Adreno 650		180 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
83.5 %
06/2020
Oppo Find X2 Neo
SD 765G, Adreno 620		171 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
85 %
06/2020
LG Velvet
SD 765G, Adreno 620		180 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.80"2460x1080
Vivo X50 Pro Smartphone review
Vivo X50 Pro Smartphone review
Vivo X50 Pro Smartphone review
Vivo X50 Pro Smartphone review
Vivo X50 Pro Smartphone review
Vivo X50 Pro Smartphone review
Vivo X50 Pro Smartphone review
Vivo X50 Pro Smartphone review

Size Comparison

❌
167.08 mm 74 mm 7.85 mm 180 g162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g160.2 mm 72.9 mm 8 mm 180 g158.96 mm 74.24 mm 8.9 mm 205 g159.4 mm 72.4 mm 7.7 mm 171 g158.46 mm 72.8 mm 8.04 mm 181.5 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
937 (466min - 960max) MBit/s +46%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
867 (440min - 907max) MBit/s +35%
Realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
849 (414min - 930max) MBit/s +32%
Vivo X50 Pro
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
642 (627min - 656max) MBit/s
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (294min - 639max) MBit/s -2%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
618 (310min - 644max) MBit/s -4%
iperf3 receive AX12
Realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
914 (888min - 928max) MBit/s +35%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
903 (881min - 916max) MBit/s +34%
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
894 (864min - 925max) MBit/s +32%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
683 (656min - 691max) MBit/s +1%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (664min - 686max) MBit/s 0%
Vivo X50 Pro
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
676 (631min - 695max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s -44%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
Vivo X50 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø665 (631-695)
Vivo X50 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø642 (627-656)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Vivo X50 Pro
GPS Vivo X50 Pro
GPS Vivo X50 Pro
GPS Vivo X50 Pro
GPS Vivo X50 Pro
GPS Vivo X50 Pro
Ultra-wide angle
Ultra-wide angle
Wide angle
Wide angle
2x zoom
2x zoom
5x zoom
5x zoom
60x zoom (max)
60x zoom (max)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelLow Light UltraweitwinkelWeitwinkel5-facher-Zoom
ColorChecker
7.6 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X50 Pro: 8.71 ∆E min: 3.47 - max: 15.77 ∆E
ColorChecker
22.2 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
28 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
32.1 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
32.2 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X50 Pro: 28.59 ∆E min: 12.85 - max: 42.82 ∆E
782
cd/m²		771
cd/m²		784
cd/m²
769
cd/m²		784
cd/m²		784
cd/m²
779
cd/m²		776
cd/m²		791
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 791 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 780 cd/m² Minimum: 2.35 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 784 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.99
Vivo X50 Pro
AMOLED, 2376x1080, 6.56		Xiaomi Mi 10
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67		Realme X50 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.44		OnePlus 8
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55		Oppo Find X2 Neo
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.50		LG Velvet
P-OLED, 2460x1080, 6.80
Screen
29%
-8%
30%
-35%
-1%
Brightness middle
784
786
0%
679
-13%
778
-1%
797
2%
586
-25%
Brightness
780
791
1%
690
-12%
783
0%
807
3%
587
-25%
Brightness Distribution
97
96
-1%
97
0%
95
-2%
95
-2%
97
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.5
1.1
69%
3.2
9%
0.9
74%
5.4
-54%
2.8
20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.4
2.2
66%
6.2
3%
2.2
66%
9.2
-44%
6.3
2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3
1.8
40%
4.1
-37%
1.7
43%
6.4
-113%
2.3
23%
Gamma
1.99 111%
2.26 97%
2.28 96%
2.25 98%
2.27 97%
2.01 109%
CCT
6666 98%
6315 103%
6604 98%
6481 100%
7245 90%
6827 95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 373.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 373.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 373.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
634 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
910 Points +44%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
915 Points +44%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
919 Points +45%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
620 Points -2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
554 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (554 - 673, n=17)
603 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=217, last 2 years)
918 Points +45%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1876 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3309 Points +76%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3087 Points +65%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3427 Points +83%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1854 Points -1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1797 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1520 - 1966, n=17)
1781 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=217, last 2 years)
3009 Points +60%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1265 Points
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1187 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (168 - 1278, n=12)
1060 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 9992, n=86, last 2 years)
4246 Points +236%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1302 Points
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1242 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1231 - 1302, n=10)
1265 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (434 - 10711, n=78, last 2 years)
4051 Points +211%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2882 Points
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4304 Points +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2689 - 2882, n=3)
2811 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)
5228 Points +81%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
7665 Points
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13589 Points +77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (6213 - 7765, n=3)
7214 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)
14045 Points +83%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9965 Points
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9576 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8591 - 9965, n=3)
9175 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)
10872 Points +9%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9675 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11850 Points +22%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
19711 Points +104%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13079 Points +35%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9955 Points +3%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
9154 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8687 - 11041, n=16)
9734 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points +56%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8065 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10613 Points +32%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13202 Points +64%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10800 Points +34%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8456 Points +5%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7808 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7245 - 9989, n=17)
8308 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points +35%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
44918 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points -100%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
83917 Points +87%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
72524 Points +61%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
44531 Points -1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
43325 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (38137 - 48201, n=17)
44398 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
68808 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points -100%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
145603 Points +112%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
144611 Points +110%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69645 Points +1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
68764 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (56690 - 70216, n=17)
67538 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
20631 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points -100%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
33793 Points +64%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27026 Points +31%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19658 Points -5%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18769 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (14891 - 28331, n=17)
20632 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4652 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8581 Points +84%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8947 Points +92%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8810 Points +89%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4561 Points -2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3576 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2972 - 4693, n=17)
4318 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)
3766 Points -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5176 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12234 Points +136%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11533 Points +123%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11540 Points +123%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5148 Points -1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5005 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2844 - 5832, n=17)
4882 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)
4186 Points -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3432 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4196 Points +22%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5034 Points +47%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4819 Points +40%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points -5%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1689 Points -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1689 - 3529, n=17)
3237 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)
3082 Points -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4819 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8499 Points +76%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9910 Points +106%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9850 Points +104%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4621 Points -4%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3678 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3678 - 4893, n=17)
4562 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)
9351 Points +94%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5265 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12601 Points +139%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12895 Points +145%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12873 Points +145%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5356 Points +2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5437 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4036 - 5437, n=17)
5181 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)
16352 Points +211%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3651 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3973 Points +9%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5478 Points +50%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5406 Points +48%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3099 Points -15%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1790 Points -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1790 - 3651, n=17)
3275 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)
4426 Points +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3329 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7190 Points +116%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7293 Points +119%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7174 Points +116%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points -1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3278 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2261 - 3346, n=17)
3162 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=103, last 2 years)
2770 Points -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3342 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8371 Points +150%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8345 Points +150%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8288 Points +148%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points -2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3289 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2048 - 3342, n=17)
3137 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=103, last 2 years)
2769 Points -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3462 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4813 Points +39%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5068 Points +46%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4879 Points +41%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3395 Points -2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3312 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2964 - 3556, n=17)
3331 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=103, last 2 years)
3166 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3597 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7957 Points +121%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points +128%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8153 Points +127%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3501 Points -3%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2934 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2934 - 3605, n=17)
3413 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=180, last 2 years)
6789 Points +89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3556 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9389 Points +164%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9567 Points +169%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9542 Points +168%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3569 Points 0%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3547 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2814 - 3592, n=17)
3467 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=179, last 2 years)
9811 Points +176%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3765 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5187 Points +38%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5523 Points +47%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5401 Points +43%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points -12%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1898 Points -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1898 - 3765, n=17)
3288 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=179, last 2 years)
4236 Points +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3087 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6182 Points +100%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6644 Points +115%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6543 Points +112%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3065 Points -1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2877 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2287 - 3130, n=17)
2966 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6439, n=97, last 2 years)
2687 Points -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3149 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8175 Points +160%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8263 Points +162%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8294 Points +163%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3147 Points 0%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3193 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 3198, n=17)
3053 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=97, last 2 years)
2871 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2893 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3336 Points +15%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3947 Points +36%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3763 Points +30%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2756 Points -5%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2145 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 2979, n=17)
2742 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 3525, n=97, last 2 years)
2676 Points -8%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
81 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps +11%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps -26%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps -26%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
61 fps -25%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (43 - 86, n=15)
62.5 fps -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)
84.6 fps +4%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
93 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
202 fps +117%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
204 fps +119%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
207 fps +123%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
94 fps +1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
96 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (48 - 97, n=15)
88.7 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)
247 fps +166%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
46 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps +91%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps +30%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps +30%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps +9%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
47 fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (30 - 55, n=15)
46.5 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)
72.2 fps +57%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
50 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
123 fps +146%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
124 fps +148%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
125 fps +150%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
56 fps +12%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (31 - 56, n=15)
51.1 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)
140.6 fps +181%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
31 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
75 fps +142%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps +94%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps +94%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps +10%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
32 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (21 - 37, n=15)
31.5 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)
60.9 fps +96%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
35 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps +146%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps +146%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps +151%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps +9%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
37 fps +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (22 - 38, n=15)
35.3 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)
99 fps +183%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
18 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
42 fps +133%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
44 fps +144%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps +156%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps +6%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (11 - 21, n=15)
17.7 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)
43.4 fps +141%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
20 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps +150%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps +155%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
52 fps +160%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps +5%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (12 - 21, n=15)
19.7 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)
59.9 fps +200%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
46 fps +119%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps +119%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps +129%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps 0%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20 fps -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (13 - 23, n=17)
20.2 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=225, last 2 years)
44.2 fps +110%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
53 fps +130%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps +130%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps +135%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps +4%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
23 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (12 - 24, n=17)
21.6 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=225, last 2 years)
64.5 fps +180%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
29 fps +123%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
30 fps +131%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps +138%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps 0%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
12 fps -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.8 - 15, n=17)
12.3 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 119, n=225, last 2 years)
32.9 fps +153%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.3 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps +141%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps +141%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps +141%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps +2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5.3 - 13, n=17)
8.38 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=225, last 2 years)
25.7 fps +210%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
327208 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
566256 Points +73%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
593933 Points +82%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
563466 Points +72%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
326795 Points 0%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
308878 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (285731 - 332305, n=14)
312767 Points -4%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3857 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5752 Points +49%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6205 Points +61%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5897 Points +53%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3931 Points +2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3674 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3237 - 4094, n=14)
3813 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)
5745 Points +49%
System (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6936 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9810 Points +41%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10147 Points +46%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10021 Points +44%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6685 Points -4%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6430 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5411 - 6936, n=14)
6506 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)
9678 Points +40%
Memory (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4637 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7450 Points +61%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points +77%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6912 Points +49%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4856 Points +5%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4556 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4556 - 5683, n=14)
5099 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)
6250 Points +35%
Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4639 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11730 Points +153%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11688 Points +152%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11654 Points +151%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5216 Points +12%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5153 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2525 - 5247, n=14)
4732 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)
14101 Points +204%
Web (sort by value)
Vivo X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1442 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1276 Points -12%
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1576 Points +9%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1498 Points +4%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1412 Points -2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1226 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1139 - 1462, n=14)
1372 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)
1494 Points +4%
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +570%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
69.5 Points +339%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
51.3 Points +224%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
51 Points +222%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
50.9 Points +221%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=12)
47.7 Points +201%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
39.33 Points +148%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
15.84 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
116.7 Points +984%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
109.2 Points +914%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points +868%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.9, n=11)
81.1 Points +653%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
79.1 Points +634%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
10.77 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +1090%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
67.3 runs/min +648%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
56.2 runs/min +524%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
50.8 runs/min +464%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
49.8 runs/min +453%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=9)
46.1 runs/min +412%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
9 runs/min
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +566%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
118 Points +490%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
102 Points +410%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
99 Points +395%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
76 Points +280%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
74 Points +270%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13)
71.5 Points +258%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
20 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years)
33640 Points +837%
Realme X50 Pro
23768 Points +562%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
22016 Points +513%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
18546 Points +416%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14)
16671 Points +364%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
16523 Points +360%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
15745 Points +338%
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
3592 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85)
15230 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14)
3721 ms * +76%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
2689 ms * +82%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
2666 ms * +82%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
2538 ms * +83%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
2104 ms * +86%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
2000 ms * +87%
Realme X50 Pro
0 ms * +100%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +90%

* ... smaller is better

Vivo X50 ProXiaomi Mi 10Realme X50 ProOnePlus 8Oppo Find X2 NeoLG VelvetAverage 256 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
88%
113%
101%
27%
19%
13%
155%
Sequential Read 256KB
925
1498
62%
1756
90%
1707
85%
943
2%
925
0%
826 ?(496 - 984, n=22)
-11%
1505 ?(226 - 4512, n=215, last 2 years)
63%
Sequential Write 256KB
209.1
680
225%
756
262%
748
258%
454.4
117%
409.2
96%
358 ?(198.5 - 914, n=22)
71%
1112 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=215, last 2 years)
432%
Random Read 4KB
165.2
207
25%
229.4
39%
215
30%
160.5
-3%
154.3
-7%
166.6 ?(108.4 - 265, n=22)
1%
247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=215, last 2 years)
50%
Random Write 4KB
156.8
215.9
38%
252
61%
203.9
30%
143.8
-8%
135.9
-13%
141.5 ?(22.1 - 280, n=22)
-10%
271 ?(13 - 709, n=215, last 2 years)
73%
Carga Máxima
 31.5 °C31.7 °C30.2 °C 
 32 °C32.8 °C30.9 °C 
 32.4 °C32 °C30.7 °C 
Máximo: 32.8 °C
Médio: 31.6 °C
30 °C30.2 °C30.2 °C
30 °C30.5 °C30.7 °C
28.9 °C30.2 °C31 °C
Máximo: 31 °C
Médio: 30.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  24 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.935.7252945.13121.939.4402242.75029.942.76322478019.344.510016.345.41251447.716016.95320014.957.225014.158.53151059.84001161.650011.766.963010.969.580011.974.410001174.9125010.275.8160011.480.1200012.882.2250012.983.2315012.582.540001379.9500013.185.1630013.483.6800015.782.41000013.582.9125001477.31600013.767.4SPL24.893.2N0.695.9median 13median 75.8Delta1.39.932.828.826.228.123.32521.925.52831.119.924.419.122.519.926.116.531.619.644.517.544.317.55113.956.713.961.415.865.215.265.61466.3146713.970.313.473.113.874.514.374.91473.414.572.714.670.914.569.414.768.415.165.41561.914.849.326.583.50.854.8median 14.6median 65.61.18.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVivo X50 ProXiaomi Mi 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Vivo X50 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.03 / 0.39 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.18 / 2.45 / 2.51 Watt
Carga midlight 3.61 / 5.36 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Vivo X50 Pro
4315 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh		Realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh		OnePlus 8
4300 mAh		Oppo Find X2 Neo
4025 mAh		LG Velvet
4300 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
12%
-4%
-1%
13%
25%
7%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
1.18
0.53
55%
1
15%
0.9
24%
0.8
32%
0.66
44%
0.965 ?(0.66 - 1.8, n=15)
18%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years)
24%
Idle Average *
2.45
1.46
40%
1.77
28%
2.3
6%
2.21
10%
1.58
36%
1.899 ?(0.82 - 2.55, n=15)
22%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years)
41%
Idle Maximum *
2.51
1.52
39%
1.86
26%
2.33
7%
2.23
11%
1.6
36%
2.07 ?(0.85 - 2.9, n=15)
18%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years)
35%
Load Average *
3.61
3.83
-6%
4.23
-17%
3.5
3%
3.14
13%
3.3
9%
3.98 ?(2.73 - 6.8, n=15)
-10%
5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years)
-54%
Load Maximum *
5.36
8.89
-66%
9.13
-70%
7.68
-43%
5.44
-1%
5.46
-2%
6.19 ?(4.4 - 10.3, n=15)
-15%
8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years)
-55%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
25h 29min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
22h 32min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 36min
Vivo X50 Pro
4315 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh		Realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh		OnePlus 8
4300 mAh		Oppo Find X2 Neo
4025 mAh		LG Velvet
4300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
-8%
-4%
-7%
-3%
Reader / Idle
1529
1789
17%
1507
-1%
1374
-10%
H.264
1352
1126
-17%
1029
-24%
1096
-19%
WiFi v1.3
763
662
-13%
775
2%
1045
37%
712
-7%
741
-3%
Load
216
226
5%
194
-10%
168
-22%

Pro

+ Painel OLED brilhante de 90 HZ
+ Quase nenhuma emissão de calor
+ Tecnologia gimbal
+ Boa câmera principal
+ Bom alto-falante...

Contra

- ...mas apenas mono
- Sem certificação IP, sem carregamento sem fio
- SO FunTouch
- Leitor de digitais
- Widevine L3

Veredicto do Vivo X50 Pro: Design elegante com câmera Gimbal

In review: Vivo X50 Pro. Review unit provided by TradingShenzhen.
In review: Vivo X50 Pro. Review unit provided by TradingShenzhen.

O Vivo X50 Pro combina hardware de gama média com uma excelente qualidade de construção, uma sensação de alta qualidade e um design moderno. Ele possui um painel AMOLED brilhante, bem como uma câmera gimbal capaz de tirar fotos muito boas. Apesar de o Vivo X50 Pro ser apenas um dispositivo de gama média superior, seu nível de estabilização de imagem é excelente quando comparado diretamente com smartphones topo de linha com OIS tradicional.

O Vivo X50 Pro é um smartphone de gama média de boa aparência. No entanto, seu sistema operacional FunTouch precisa urgentemente de alguma “europeização”.

Os preços oficiais europeus ainda não foram anunciados. Se acabar custando quase o mesmo que o LG Velvet entes “exótico” contendor de gama média certamente se tornará uma opção interessante. Dita competição neste segmento é dura e numerosa, e uma vez que o X50 Pro esteja oficialmente disponível na Europa, esperamos que dispositivos como o Xiaomi Mi 10 ou OnePlus 8 compitam quase na mesma faixa de preço.

Dado que o fabricante chinês já estabeleceu a sua presença na Alemanha com, entre outros, uma conta oficial do Instagram, esperamos que estes dispositivos estejam oficialmente disponíveis o mais tardar no final deste ano. Com o lançamento da versão global deste dispositivo, esperamos ver recursos de software ajustados em comparação com nossa unidade de análise chinesa, uma certificação DRM e suporte para bandas LTE adicionais, como a banda 28 bastante comum.

Vivo X50 Pro - 08/31/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
88%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
52 / 70 → 74%
Peso
90%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
36 / 64 → 56%
Desempenho da aplicação
66 / 86 → 76%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
72%
Médio
78%
84%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

More articles related to this device

Vivo X50 Pro (X Serie)
Análise
•
Revisão do smartphone Vivo X80...
|
Análise
•
Revisão do Vivo X60 Pro - smar...

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Vivo X50 Pro - A câmera gimbal "revolucionária" faz alguma diferença?
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-10- 7 (Update: 2020-10-12)