Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Realme X50 Pro - Campeão do preço-desempenho?

Picos e vales. O X50 Pro brilha com um ótimo design da carcaça e boas especificações. No entanto, o smartphone carro-chefe da Realme carece de alguns recursos premium em comparação com a concorrência de gama alta. Nesta análise, examinaremos as desvantagens que os compradores do X50 Pro terão que enfrentar.
Realme X50 Pro (X Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Placa gráfica
Memória
12 GB 
Pantalha
6.44 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, OLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 90 Hz
Disco rígido
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 227 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, OTG, Miracast
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G NR: n77/78/38/40/41/1/3/5/7/28; FDD-LTE: Bands 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/66; TD-LTE: Bands 38/39/40/41/42; WCDMA: B1/2/4/5/6/8/19; GSM: 850/900/1800/1900, LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 158.96 x 74.24
Bateria
4200 mAh Lítio-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (26mm, FOV 78.6°, f/1.8, 6P lens Samsung GW1, 1/1.72”) + 12 MP (54.0mm, f/2.5, 5P lens) + 8 MP (15.7mm, FOV 119°) + 2MP (FOV 88.8°, f/2.4), Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (FOV 80.4°, f/2.5, 5P lens Sony IMX 616) + 8 MP (FOV 105°, f/2.2, 5P lens)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Onscreen, Cabo USB, carregador modular, capa protetora, protetor de tela, realme UI, 24 Meses Garantia, Widevine L1, fanless
peso
205 g, Suprimento de energia: 115 g
Preço
750 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.1 %
06/2020
Realme X50 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
205 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.44"2400x1080
87.8 %
06/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
88.4 %
06/2020
OnePlus 8
SD 865, Adreno 650
180 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
87.4 %
04/2020
Huawei P40
Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16
175 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.10"2340x1080
81 %
06/2020
Motorola Edge
SD 765, Adreno 620
190 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2340x1080
87.7 %
03/2020
Samsung Galaxy S20
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
163 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.20"3200x1440

Size Comparison

162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g161.6 mm 71.1 mm 9.3 mm 190 g160.2 mm 72.9 mm 8 mm 180 g158.96 mm 74.24 mm 8.9 mm 205 g151.7 mm 69.1 mm 7.9 mm 163 g148.9 mm 71.1 mm 8.5 mm 175 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1296 (1095min - 1376max) MBit/s +53%
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
937 (466min - 960max) MBit/s +10%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
882 (847min - 902max) MBit/s +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
867 (440min - 907max) MBit/s +2%
Realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
849 (414min - 930max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge
Adreno 620, SD 765, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 (608min - 667max) MBit/s -23%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1368 (1104min - 1442max) MBit/s +50%
Realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
914 (888min - 928max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
903 (881min - 916max) MBit/s -1%
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
894 (864min - 925max) MBit/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
827 (791min - 846max) MBit/s -10%
Motorola Edge
Adreno 620, SD 765, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
561 (216min - 668max) MBit/s -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s -59%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Realme X50 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø912 (888-928)
Realme X50 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø836 (414-930)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS realme X50 Pro
GPS realme X50 Pro
GPS realme X50 Pro
GPS realme X50 Pro
GPS realme X50 Pro
GPS realme X50 Pro
Picture taken with the X50 Pro: Ultra-wide-angle
Picture taken with the X50 Pro: Ultra-wide-angle
Picture taken with the X50 Pro: Wide-angle
Picture taken with the X50 Pro: Wide-angle
Picture taken with the X50 Pro: 2x zoom
Picture taken with the X50 Pro: 2x zoom
Picture taken with the X50 Pro: 5x zoom
Picture taken with the X50 Pro: 5x zoom

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4Scene 5
ColorChecker
21.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
16 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Realme X50 Pro: 11.42 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.46 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.6 ∆E
43 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
53.1 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
54.9 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
49.6 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Realme X50 Pro: 37.51 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 54.92 ∆E
686
cd/m²
688
cd/m²
700
cd/m²
689
cd/m²
679
cd/m²
695
cd/m²
689
cd/m²
683
cd/m²
703
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 703 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 690.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.85 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 679 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
92.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Realme X50 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.44
Xiaomi Mi 10
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
OnePlus 8
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Huawei P40
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.10
Motorola Edge
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.70
Samsung Galaxy S20
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.20
Screen
36%
37%
7%
-32%
19%
Brightness middle
679
786
16%
778
15%
583
-14%
427
-37%
745
10%
Brightness
690
791
15%
783
13%
593
-14%
438
-37%
740
7%
Brightness Distribution
97
96
-1%
95
-2%
94
-3%
94
-3%
97
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.2
1.1
66%
0.9
72%
3.03
5%
5.34
-67%
2.67
17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.2
2.2
65%
2.2
65%
5.33
14%
9.33
-50%
4.52
27%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.1
1.8
56%
1.7
59%
2
51%
4
2%
2
51%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.26 97%
2.25 98%
2.301 96%
2.315 95%
2.092 105%
CCT
6604 98%
6315 103%
6481 100%
6621 98%
7221 90%
6240 104%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 367.6 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18110 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
915 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
910 Points -1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
919 Points 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
755 Points -17%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
589 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
903 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (764 - 924, n=23)
903 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=212, last 2 years)
902 Points -1%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3087 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3309 Points +7%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3427 Points +11%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2988 Points -3%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
1869 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2731 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2687 - 3449, n=23)
3268 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=212, last 2 years)
2950 Points -4%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3067 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2829 Points -8%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3001 Points -2%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3606 Points +18%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
1054 Points -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2829 - 3080, n=8)
2981 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (516 - 18876, n=39, last 2 years)
6770 Points +121%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3259 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2549 Points -22%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2663 Points -18%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2693 Points -17%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
977 Points -70%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3670 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2487 - 3259, n=8)
2723 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (281 - 18656, n=45, last 2 years)
7243 Points +122%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4304 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4261 - 4304, n=5)
4281 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (800 - 9574, n=90, last 2 years)
5063 Points +18%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13589 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (13186 - 13589, n=5)
13396 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 26990, n=90, last 2 years)
13549 Points 0%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9576 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9443 - 9739, n=5)
9559 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2053 - 18432, n=70, last 2 years)
10590 Points +11%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
19711 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11850 Points -40%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13079 Points -34%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
11268 Points -43%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
10045 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
14708 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (10990 - 19989, n=22)
13584 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points -23%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13202 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10613 Points -20%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10800 Points -18%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8736 Points -34%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
8336 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10431 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9202 - 15299, n=23)
11246 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points -18%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
83917 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points -100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
72524 Points -14%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46552 Points -45%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
42752 Points -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (56045 - 112989, n=20)
84555 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
145603 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points -100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
144611 Points -1%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
66142 Points -55%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
62819 Points -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (110875 - 180392, n=20)
147707 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
33793 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points -100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27026 Points -20%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
22857 Points -32%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
20185 Points -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (17817 - 58293, n=20)
35224 Points +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8947 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8581 Points -4%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8810 Points -2%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3973 Points -56%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
4325 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5646 Points -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8215 - 9611, n=20)
8915 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (712 - 7285, n=52, last 2 years)
3495 Points -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11533 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12234 Points +6%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11540 Points 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3894 Points -66%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
4671 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6388 Points -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (10599 - 13305, n=20)
11750 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (618 - 9451, n=52, last 2 years)
3845 Points -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5034 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4196 Points -17%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4819 Points -4%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4279 Points -15%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
3435 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4015 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3965 - 5274, n=20)
4844 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4525, n=52, last 2 years)
2989 Points -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9910 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8499 Points -14%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9850 Points -1%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4432 Points -55%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
4435 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7981 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8499 - 11492, n=22)
9645 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=115, last 2 years)
9014 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12895 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12601 Points -2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12873 Points 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4293 Points -67%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
4829 Points -63%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
11301 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11956 - 16809, n=22)
12921 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=114, last 2 years)
15728 Points +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5478 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3973 Points -27%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5406 Points -1%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4998 Points -9%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
3449 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3935 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3956 - 5765, n=22)
5138 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=114, last 2 years)
4327 Points -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7293 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7190 Points -1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7174 Points -2%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5651 Points -23%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
3001 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6732 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5996 - 7653, n=21)
7103 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=102, last 2 years)
2665 Points -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8345 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8371 Points 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8288 Points -1%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6244 Points -25%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
2897 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8411 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (6500 - 9167, n=20)
8128 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=102, last 2 years)
2655 Points -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5068 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4813 Points -5%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4879 Points -4%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4242 Points -16%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
3435 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3963 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 5209, n=20)
4941 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=102, last 2 years)
3119 Points -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7957 Points -3%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8153 Points -1%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6140 Points -25%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
3223 Points -61%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6638 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7517 - 8947, n=23)
8073 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=175, last 2 years)
6514 Points -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9567 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9389 Points -2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9542 Points 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6606 Points -31%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
3165 Points -67%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8106 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8633 - 11999, n=22)
9501 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=174, last 2 years)
9281 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5523 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5187 Points -6%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5401 Points -2%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4924 Points -11%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
3442 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4063 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4733 - 5780, n=22)
5319 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=174, last 2 years)
4150 Points -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6644 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6182 Points -7%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6543 Points -2%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5456 Points -18%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
2791 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5139 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 6961, n=20)
6202 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6439, n=97, last 2 years)
2594 Points -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8263 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8175 Points -1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8294 Points 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6326 Points -23%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
2786 Points -66%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6315 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7618 - 9104, n=19)
8249 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=97, last 2 years)
2755 Points -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3947 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3336 Points -15%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3763 Points -5%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3684 Points -7%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
2810 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3112 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1786 - 4061, n=19)
3414 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 3525, n=97, last 2 years)
2668 Points -32%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps +50%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps 0%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
78 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (50 - 138, n=23)
75.4 fps +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=178, last 2 years)
83 fps +38%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
204 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
202 fps -1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
207 fps +1%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
151 fps -26%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
87 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
199 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (168 - 266, n=23)
206 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=178, last 2 years)
244 fps +20%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps +47%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46 fps -23%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
48 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (50 - 111, n=23)
71.7 fps +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=179, last 2 years)
71 fps +18%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
124 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
123 fps -1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
125 fps +1%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
100 fps -19%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
50 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
108 fps -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (96 - 151, n=23)
123.6 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=179, last 2 years)
138 fps +11%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
75 fps +25%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
57 fps -5%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
32 fps -47%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
59 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (43 - 83, n=24)
60.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=179, last 2 years)
59.9 fps 0%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps +2%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33 fps -62%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
33 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
85 fps -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (67 - 103, n=24)
86 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=179, last 2 years)
96.7 fps +12%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
44 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
42 fps -5%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps +5%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
36 fps -18%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps -59%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
43 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (25 - 54, n=24)
40.5 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=179, last 2 years)
42.9 fps -2%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps -2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
52 fps +2%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43 fps -16%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
19 fps -63%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
50 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (39 - 62, n=24)
51.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=179, last 2 years)
58.6 fps +15%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
46 fps 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps +4%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
42 fps -9%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
20 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
50 fps +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (28 - 57, n=25)
43.2 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=219, last 2 years)
43.2 fps -6%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
53 fps 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps +2%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps -8%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
54 fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (27 - 67, n=25)
52.7 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=219, last 2 years)
63 fps +19%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
30 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
29 fps -3%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps +3%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
27 fps -10%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
12 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
22 fps -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (18 - 40, n=25)
27.8 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 105, n=219, last 2 years)
32.2 fps +7%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29 fps +45%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
7.5 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
20 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (20 - 27, n=25)
20.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=219, last 2 years)
25.1 fps +26%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
593933 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
566256 Points -5%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
563466 Points -5%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
450373 Points -24%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
304120 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
504192 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (527301 - 631025, n=24)
579049 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
101336 Points -83%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6205 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5752 Points -7%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5897 Points -5%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5105 Points -18%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
3742 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4764 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5264 - 6402, n=23)
5871 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=158, last 2 years)
5704 Points -8%
System (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10147 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9810 Points -3%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10021 Points -1%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8992 Points -11%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
6612 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8843 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8412 - 10147, n=23)
9660 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=158, last 2 years)
9621 Points -5%
Memory (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7450 Points -9%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6912 Points -16%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6942 Points -15%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
4528 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4271 Points -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5304 - 8874, n=23)
7073 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12306, n=158, last 2 years)
6230 Points -24%
Graphics (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11688 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11730 Points 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11654 Points 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8634 Points -26%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
4681 Points -60%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10703 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11366 - 13833, n=23)
11779 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
13900 Points +19%
Web (sort by value)
Realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1576 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1276 Points -19%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1498 Points -5%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1260 Points -20%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
1399 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
1274 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1276 - 2169, n=23)
1497 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=158, last 2 years)
1487 Points -6%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=167, last 2 years)
104.5 Points +50%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
69.5 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20)
63.6 Points -8%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
55.6 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
53.9 Points -22%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
51.3 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
50.9 Points -27%
Motorola Edge (Chrome 81)
48.34 Points -30%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (66.1 - 414, n=3, last 2 years)
194.9 Points +67%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
116.7 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 145.1, n=21)
113.1 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
109.2 Points -6%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
103.2 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
93.5 Points -20%
Motorola Edge (Chrome 81)
87.8 Points -25%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
79.1 Points -32%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=151, last 2 years)
105.7 runs/min +57%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
67.3 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19)
63.9 runs/min -5%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
63 runs/min -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
56.2 runs/min -16%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chome 80)
50.8 runs/min -25%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
50.8 runs/min -25%
Motorola Edge (Chome 81)
26.8 runs/min -60%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 304, n=119, last 2 years)
131.8 Points +29%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
118 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23)
106.7 Points +5%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
102 Points
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
99 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
97 Points -5%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
95 Points -7%
Motorola Edge (Chrome 81)
72 Points -29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=202, last 2 years)
33525 Points +41%
Realme X50 Pro
23768 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23)
22518 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
22016 Points -7%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
21348 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
18162 Points -24%
Motorola Edge (Chrome 81)
17700 Points -26%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
15745 Points -34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Edge (Chrome 81)
2754 ms * -38%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
2538 ms * -27%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
2511 ms * -26%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
2287 ms * -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
2104 ms * -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24)
2031 ms * -2%
Realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
2000 ms *
Realme X50 Pro
0 ms * +100%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=165, last 2 years)
1653 ms * +17%

* ... smaller is better

Realme X50 ProXiaomi Mi 10OnePlus 8Huawei P40Motorola EdgeSamsung Galaxy S20Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-12%
-7%
-30%
-41%
-11%
-18%
9%
Sequential Read 256KB
1756
1498
-15%
1707
-3%
1592
-9%
941
-46%
1542
-12%
1573 ?(983 - 1789, n=21)
-10%
1467 ?(215 - 4512, n=210, last 2 years)
-16%
Sequential Write 256KB
756
680
-10%
748
-1%
212.9
-72%
451.7
-40%
670
-11%
559 ?(387 - 818, n=21)
-26%
1077 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=210, last 2 years)
42%
Random Read 4KB
229.4
207
-10%
215
-6%
189.4
-17%
150.5
-34%
205.3
-11%
209 ?(168.5 - 265, n=21)
-9%
241 ?(22.2 - 543, n=210, last 2 years)
5%
Random Write 4KB
252
215.9
-14%
203.9
-19%
197
-22%
145.2
-42%
228.1
-9%
186.4 ?(24.8 - 272, n=21)
-26%
265 ?(13 - 709, n=210, last 2 years)
5%
PUBG mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Realme X50 Pro; Balanced: Ø59.8 (53-60)
Realme X50 Pro; HD: Ø59.8 (57-60)
Asphalt 9 Legends
051015202530Tooltip
Realme X50 Pro: Ø29.5 (17-31)
Carga Máxima
 31 °C30.8 °C29 °C 
 31.5 °C31 °C28.9 °C 
 30.8 °C31.8 °C29 °C 
Máximo: 31.8 °C
Médio: 30.4 °C
27.9 °C28.9 °C29.3 °C
27.5 °C28.5 °C29.9 °C
27.5 °C29.1 °C29.9 °C
Máximo: 29.9 °C
Médio: 28.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  23.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.539.22529.426.93122.826.24025.325.85030.236.46323.324.48021.924.5100192212519.632.41601946.120016.146.825018.954.631516.659.540014.361.5500156563015.269.480014.371.2100014.372.1125014.273.1160014.874.9200014.875.1250014.475.6315014.377.8400014.680.7500014.779.4630014.974800014.970.51000014.668.31250014.855.61600015.448.3SPL26.887.7N0.969.3median 14.8median 69.4Delta0.71032.828.826.228.123.32521.925.52831.119.924.419.122.519.926.116.531.619.644.517.544.317.55113.956.713.961.415.865.215.265.61466.3146713.970.313.473.113.874.514.374.91473.414.572.714.670.914.569.414.768.415.165.41561.914.849.326.583.50.854.8median 14.6median 65.61.18.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRealme X50 ProXiaomi Mi 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Realme X50 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.03 / 0.49 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1 / 1.77 / 1.86 Watt
Carga midlight 4.23 / 9.13 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Huawei P40
3800 mAh
Motorola Edge
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
19%
-2%
1%
4%
-4%
-20%
4%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.53
47%
0.9
10%
1
-0%
1
-0%
0.9
10%
1.133 ?(0.52 - 2.2, n=22)
-13%
0.891 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years)
11%
Idle Average *
1.77
1.46
18%
2.3
-30%
1.9
-7%
1.4
21%
1.5
15%
2.23 ?(1.19 - 5.37, n=22)
-26%
1.448 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years)
18%
Idle Maximum *
1.86
1.52
18%
2.33
-25%
2.4
-29%
2
-8%
2
-8%
2.45 ?(1.23 - 5.41, n=22)
-32%
1.63 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years)
12%
Load Average *
4.23
3.83
9%
3.5
17%
3.5
17%
4.8
-13%
4.8
-13%
5.26 ?(3.5 - 7.4, n=22)
-24%
5.57 ?(2.4 - 16.5, n=157, last 2 years)
-32%
Load Maximum *
9.13
8.89
3%
7.68
16%
6.9
24%
7.3
20%
11.5
-26%
9.68 ?(7.67 - 12.3, n=22)
-6%
8.27 ?(4.32 - 20.8, n=157, last 2 years)
9%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
25h 07min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 55min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 9min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 14min
Realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Huawei P40
3800 mAh
Motorola Edge
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
7%
5%
16%
31%
14%
Reader / Idle
1507
1789
19%
1374
-9%
2063
37%
2515
67%
2105
40%
H.264
1029
1126
9%
1096
7%
1052
2%
1197
16%
809
-21%
WiFi v1.3
775
662
-15%
1045
35%
806
4%
888
15%
726
-6%
Load
194
226
16%
168
-13%
236
22%
240
24%
279
44%

Pro

+ Impressionante painel OLED
+ 90 Hz
+ Armazenamento veloz
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Desempenho veloz
+ 5G e carregador de 65-W

Contra

- Limitado a USB 2.0
- Sem slot para cartão SD/fone de ouvido de 3,5 mm
- Sem dual SIM
- Buraco grande
- Sem carregamento sem fio/certificação IP
- Quedas ocasionais de desempenho
- Qualidade de lente de grande angular
- Posição do sensor de digitais
- Sem LED de status/modo sempre ativo

Veredicto Realme X50 Pro - Smartphone topo de gama elegante

In review: Realme X50 Pro. Test device courtesy of Realme Germany
In review: Realme X50 Pro. Test device courtesy of Realme Germany

O X50 Pro é um smartphone muito agradável esteticamente e o design mate e com várias camadas da parte traseira oferece um visual particularmente bonito. No entanto, a excelente aparência é manchada pelo módulo de câmera muito grande. Devido à qualidade das selfies de grande angular, a praticidade da segunda lente na frente está em questão e um furo mais sutil na tela poderia ter sido uma solução mais elegante. Semelhante à ótica grande angular na frente, o módulo ultra grande angular na parte traseira decepciona e não pode ser igual ao dos smartphones concorrentes em termos de qualidade. O mesmo vale para a lente telefoto e, em menor grau, para a câmera principal. Por 750 Euros (~US$ 844), os compradores merecem mais quando se trata da qualidade geral das câmeras.

Embora exista muito o que gostar sobre o smartphone Realme X50 Pro, o preço sugerido pelo fabricante chinês é muito alto devido à forte concorrência.

Com bons alto-falantes estéreo, um belo painel OLED de 90 Hz e hardware poderoso, que traz suas próprias desvantagens na forma de quedas esporádicas de desempenho que não ocorrem com alternativas de gama alta, o X50 Pro ainda é um bom telefone.

Realme X50 Pro - 08/31/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
53 / 70 → 75%
Peso
88%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
61 / 64 → 96%
Desempenho da aplicação
84 / 86 → 97%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 85%
Camera
67%
Médio
81%
86%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Realme X50 Pro - Campeão do preço-desempenho?
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-06-16 (Update: 2020-06-22)