Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S20+: Um telefone com recursos de vídeo de 8K

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/12/2020

Um gênio universal? O modelo Plus da série Samsung Galaxy S20 oferece um pouco mais de tudo do que o Galaxy S20. Há um pouco mais de tela aqui, mais bateria ali e uma câmera traseira adicional também. Com um preço de lançamento de 1.000 Euros (~US$ 1.094) para cima, você deve esperar muito do Galaxy S20+ também. Assim, examinaremos o Galaxy S20+ em detalhes para ver o que ele tem a oferecer.

Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Galaxy S20 Serie)
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
Memória
8192 MB 
Pantalha
6.7 polegadas 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 524 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 120 Hz
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Saída de áudio via USB Type-C, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 1 TB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, barômetro
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS: Bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 8. LTE: Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.8 x 161.9 x 73.7
Bateria
4500 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix , f/1.8, phase comparison AF (dual pixel), OIS, LED flash (câmera 1); 64.0 MP, f/2.0, comparação de faces AF, OIS, vídeos em 4320p/24 FPS (câmera 2); 12.0 MP, f/2.2, ultra-wide-angle lens (câmera 3); Depth of field (câmera 4)
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix , f/2.2, comparação e faces AF (dual pixel), vídeos em 2160p/30 FPS
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo (hí0brido), Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB Type-C, headset, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, IP68 certified; LTE Cat. 20/18 (2000 Mbps/210 Mbps); SAR: 0.376 W/kg (head), 1.57 W/kg (body), fanless, waterproof
peso
188 g, Suprimento de energia: 59 g
Preço
1000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Device comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88 %
04/2020
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
188 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"3200x1440
87 %
09/2019
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
226 g64 GB SSD6.5"2688x1242
89 %
12/2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
87 %
11/2019
OnePlus 7T Pro
SD 855+, Adreno 640
206 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"3120x1440
85 %
07/2019
Sony Xperia 1
SD 855, Adreno 640
178 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.5"3840x1644
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Galaxy S20+

Size Comparison

167 mm 72 mm 8.2 mm 178 g162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g161.9 mm 73.7 mm 7.8 mm 188 g158.1 mm 73.1 mm 8.8 mm 198 g158 mm 77.8 mm 8.1 mm 226 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (min: 912, max: 1092) MBit/s ∼100% +21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (min: 468, max: 602) MBit/s ∼53% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
835 (min: 808, max: 847) MBit/s ∼83%
Sony Xperia 1
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
617 (min: 356, max: 662) MBit/s ∼61% -26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (min: 550, max: 597) MBit/s ∼57% -31%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 347, max: 505) MBit/s ∼47% -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1368, n=534)
256 MBit/s ∼25% -69%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (min: 923, max: 995) MBit/s ∼100% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (min: 584, max: 715) MBit/s ∼66% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
863 (min: 759, max: 898) MBit/s ∼89%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (min: 461, max: 625) MBit/s ∼61% -32%
Sony Xperia 1
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
531 (min: 414, max: 620) MBit/s ∼55% -38%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
352 (min: 311, max: 375) MBit/s ∼36% -59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1544, n=534)
242 MBit/s ∼25% -72%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø835 (808-847)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø863 (759-898)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
20.8 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
18 ∆E
27 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
27.2 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S20+: 24.59 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 31.82 ∆E
ColorChecker
9.4 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
11 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S20+: 8.46 ∆E min: 3.48 - max: 13.24 ∆E
728
cd/m²
736
cd/m²
770
cd/m²
738
cd/m²
740
cd/m²
771
cd/m²
732
cd/m²
742
cd/m²
767
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 771 cd/m² Médio: 747.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.12 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 740 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.269
Samsung Galaxy S20+
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
OnePlus 7T Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Sony Xperia 1
OLED, 3840x1644, 6.5
Screen
10%
-21%
-21%
17%
Brightness middle
740
790
7%
592
-20%
606
-18%
541
-27%
Brightness
747
790
6%
605
-19%
611
-18%
543
-27%
Brightness Distribution
94
97
3%
96
2%
95
1%
99
5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.6
1.4
46%
2.5
4%
3.46
-33%
0.8
69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.57
3.4
26%
5.5
-20%
5.64
-23%
1.7
63%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
1.9
-27%
2.6
-73%
2
-33%
1.2
20%
Gamma
2.269 97%
2.23 99%
2.16 102%
2.258 97%
2.2 100%
CCT
6284 103%
6466 101%
6173 105%
6779 96%
6601 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 214 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 214 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 214 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18300 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).
Geekbench 5.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2899 Points ∼95%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3062 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (2731 - 2899, n=3)
2815 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (782 - 3531, n=62)
2007 Points ∼66% -31%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
944 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
781 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (903 - 944, n=3)
929 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 1342, n=62)
574 Points ∼61% -39%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10583 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10442 Points ∼99% -1%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8760 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10255 - 10583, n=3)
10423 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=463)
5673 Points ∼54% -46%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
14760 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼94% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
12645 Points ∼86% -14%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10747 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (14307 - 14760, n=3)
14592 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=624)
6193 Points ∼42% -58%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3230 Points ∼83%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100% +20%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3564 Points ∼92% +10%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2104 Points ∼54% -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3112 - 3230, n=3)
3181 Points ∼82% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=125)
2605 Points ∼67% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8783 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼73% -27%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6527 Points ∼74% -26%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5007 Points ∼57% -43%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6315 - 8783, n=3)
7919 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=125)
2800 Points ∼32% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6355 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5509 Points ∼87% -13%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3832 Points ∼60% -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5139 - 6355, n=3)
5925 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6618, n=125)
2526 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4495 Points ∼81%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100% +24%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4683 Points ∼84% +4%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1934 Points ∼35% -57%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4063 - 4495, n=3)
4335 Points ∼78% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5728, n=469)
2110 Points ∼38% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9190 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼72% -28%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8006 Points ∼87% -13%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5674 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8106 - 9190, n=3)
8818 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9389, n=469)
1971 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7459 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼86% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6916 Points ∼93% -7%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3969 Points ∼53% -47%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6638 - 7459, n=3)
7170 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8111, n=470)
1830 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4455 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼100% +15%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4604 Points ∼90% +3%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2345 Points ∼46% -47%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3935 - 4455, n=3)
4275 Points ∼83% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5718, n=499)
2021 Points ∼39% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9471 Points ∼83%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼70% -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11448 Points ∼100% +21%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9158 Points ∼80% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (9470 - 11301, n=3)
10081 Points ∼88% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=499)
2616 Points ∼23% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7576 Points ∼88%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼82% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8605 Points ∼100% +14%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5552 Points ∼65% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (7563 - 7981, n=3)
7707 Points ∼90% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=499)
2200 Points ∼26% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4180 Points ∼85%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼82% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼100% +17%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4519 Points ∼92% +8%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2705 Points ∼55% -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3963 - 4267, n=3)
4137 Points ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4987, n=549)
2003 Points ∼41% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8469 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼72% -28%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼76% -24%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7044 Points ∼83% -17%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5663 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8257 - 8469, n=3)
8379 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=549)
1646 Points ∼19% -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6896 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6266 Points ∼91% -9%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4556 Points ∼66% -34%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6732 - 6896, n=3)
6821 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7190, n=550)
1575 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4124 Points ∼84%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼78% -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼100% +19%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4503 Points ∼92% +9%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3656 Points ∼75% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3889 - 4124, n=3)
4009 Points ∼82% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=591)
1870 Points ∼38% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6392 Points ∼57%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼100% +77%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼68% +20%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10637 Points ∼94% +66%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9447 Points ∼84% +48%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6388 - 11488, n=3)
8089 Points ∼72% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12394, n=590)
2146 Points ∼19% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5696 Points ∼70%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼97% +39%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼83% +20%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8165 Points ∼100% +43%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7197 Points ∼88% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5646 - 8010, n=3)
6451 Points ∼79% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9123, n=593)
1854 Points ∼23% -67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
27431 Points ∼63%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼78% +24%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43459 Points ∼100% +58%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
30561 Points ∼70% +11%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
28223 Points ∼65% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (27431 - 42135, n=2)
34783 Points ∼80% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 57583, n=739)
14942 Points ∼34% -46%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
48476 Points ∼24%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +325%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75073 Points ∼36% +55%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
118129 Points ∼57% +144%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
105718 Points ∼51% +118%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (48476 - 79572, n=2)
64024 Points ∼31% +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=737)
24413 Points ∼12% -50%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
41415 Points ∼43%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +134%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
64626 Points ∼67% +56%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
72173 Points ∼75% +74%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
65656 Points ∼68% +59%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (41415 - 66452, n=2)
53934 Points ∼56% +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 110468, n=737)
19480 Points ∼20% -53%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
199 fps ∼69%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +44%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼53% -24%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼64% -7%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼58% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (199 - 200, n=3)
199 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=751)
42.1 fps ∼15% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼75%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼74% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼75% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼75% 0%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼75% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (60 - 119, n=3)
79.7 fps ∼100% +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=760)
29.8 fps ∼37% -50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
126 fps ∼80%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼68% -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
111 fps ∼71% -12%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼64% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (100 - 126, n=3)
111 fps ∼71% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=656)
24.6 fps ∼16% -80%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼95% -5%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (59 - 60, n=3)
59.7 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=664)
21.1 fps ∼35% -65%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
85 fps ∼85%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼56% -34%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼79% -7%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
55 fps ∼55% -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (72 - 85, n=3)
80.7 fps ∼81% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=519)
19.9 fps ∼20% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
59 fps ∼81%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼82% +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼100% +24%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
40 fps ∼55% -32%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼56% -31%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (58 - 59, n=3)
58.7 fps ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=521)
18.3 fps ∼25% -69%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
33 fps ∼72%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +39%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼57% -21%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼37% -48%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
17 fps ∼37% -48%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (22 - 33, n=3)
29.3 fps ∼64% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=261)
10.7 fps ∼23% -68%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
22 fps ∼76%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +32%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼66% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
19 fps ∼66% -14%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼76% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (20 - 22, n=3)
21.3 fps ∼73% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 68, n=259)
7.62 fps ∼26% -65%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
52 fps ∼90%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼100% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼69% -23%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼45% -50%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
34 fps ∼59% -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (50 - 52, n=3)
51 fps ∼88% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=265)
16 fps ∼28% -69%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
58 fps ∼77%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +29%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼65% -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼63% -19%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼56% -28%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (54 - 58, n=3)
56 fps ∼75% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 165, n=264)
17.9 fps ∼24% -69%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
51 fps ∼81%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +24%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼65% -20%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
48 fps ∼76% -6%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼67% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (50 - 51, n=3)
50.3 fps ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=444)
13.5 fps ∼21% -74%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
45 fps ∼94%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼71% -24%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼50% -47%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps ∼69% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (43 - 45, n=3)
44 fps ∼92% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=448)
12 fps ∼25% -73%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
296746 Points ∼61%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼99% +63%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
486654 Points ∼100% +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (296746 - 504192, n=3)
433215 Points ∼89% +46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 599843, n=72)
303587 Points ∼62% +2%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
85.55 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29.22 (min: 4.07, max: 95.16) fps ∼34% -66%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
45.28 fps ∼53% -47%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (84.1 - 85.6, n=2)
84.8 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=73)
19.2 fps ∼22% -78%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
63.02 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31.12 (min: 11.09, max: 63.1) fps ∼49% -51%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
28.5 fps ∼45% -55%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (42.3 - 63, n=2)
52.7 fps ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=63)
16.1 fps ∼26% -74%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
71.45 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33.9 (min: 9.36, max: 74.72) fps ∼47% -53%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
44.62 fps ∼62% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (71.5 - 71.6, n=2)
71.5 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=61)
20.1 fps ∼28% -72%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4607 Score ∼92%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼100% +8%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4986 Score ∼100% +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4607 - 4957, n=3)
4783 Score ∼96% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7156, n=79)
2537 Score ∼51% -45%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
1378 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼84% +6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1236 Points ∼71% -10%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1300 Points ∼74% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (1270 - 1378, n=3)
1307 Points ∼75% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=687)
792 Points ∼45% -43%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10803 Points ∼64%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +57%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼59% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10618 Points ∼62% -2%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9318 Points ∼55% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10703 - 10803, n=3)
10762 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=687)
2309 Points ∼14% -79%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3775 Points ∼62%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼38% -38%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼100% +62%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5091 Points ∼83% +35%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2661 Points ∼43% -30%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3775 - 4497, n=3)
4181 Points ∼68% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7945, n=687)
1707 Points ∼28% -55%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9281 Points ∼65%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +53%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼66% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9294 Points ∼66% 0%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8870 Points ∼63% -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8843 - 9478, n=3)
9201 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=687)
3252 Points ∼23% -65%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4779 Points ∼85%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼100% +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼96% +13%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4992 Points ∼89% +4%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4112 Points ∼73% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4764 - 4915, n=3)
4819 Points ∼86% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=687)
1644 Points ∼29% -66%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +155%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼51% +30%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
62.417 Points ∼48% +23%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
59.453 Points ∼46% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.6 - 53.9, n=3)
52.1 Points ∼40% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
50.566 Points ∼39%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=151)
38.9 Points ∼30% -23%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +238%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼38% +29%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
115.44 Points ∼38% +29%
Sony Xperia 1
110.81 Points ∼37% +24%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (89.3 - 93.5, n=3)
90.8 Points ∼30% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
89.329 Points ∼30%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=582)
45.1 Points ∼15% -50%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100% +144%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼48% +18%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78)
66.4 runs/min ∼43% +6%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
64.2 runs/min ∼42% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chome 80)
62.8 runs/min ∼41%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.8 - 63.7, n=3)
59.1 runs/min ∼39% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=138)
42.4 runs/min ∼28% -32%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +110%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼66% +38%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
106 Points ∼59% +23%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
93 Points ∼51% +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (86 - 97, n=3)
89.7 Points ∼50% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
86 Points ∼48%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=214)
68.8 Points ∼38% -20%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +173%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
23999 Points ∼49% +33%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼48% +30%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
23318 Points ∼47% +29%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (18094 - 19122, n=3)
18459 Points ∼37% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
18094 Points ∼37%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=745)
7422 Points ∼15% -59%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (550 - 59466, n=770)
10102 ms * ∼100% -306%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
2488.3 ms * ∼25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2345 - 2511, n=3)
2448 ms * ∼24% +2%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
2133.5 ms * ∼21% +14%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
2039.9 ms * ∼20% +18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼19% +21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼6% +77%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy S20+Huawei Mate 30 ProOnePlus 7T ProSony Xperia 1Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
6%
-38%
-57%
-7%
-56%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
57.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
69.22 (Nano Memory Card)
20%
27.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-52%
59.3 (54.5 - 66.4, n=7)
3%
50.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=491)
-12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
66.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.49 (Nano Memory Card)
23%
31.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-53%
72 (66.3 - 81.6, n=7)
8%
68.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=491)
3%
Random Write 4KB
229.8
259.21
13%
26
-89%
24.16
-89%
182 (29.9 - 230, n=9)
-21%
29.5 (0.14 - 272, n=828)
-87%
Random Read 4KB
199.6
226.38
13%
169
-15%
147.32
-26%
194 (170 - 207, n=9)
-3%
54.2 (1.59 - 265, n=828)
-73%
Sequential Write 256KB
694.3
401.79
-42%
405
-42%
206.87
-70%
527 (213 - 697, n=9)
-24%
113 (2.99 - 750, n=828)
-84%
Sequential Read 256KB
1603.1
1780.5
11%
1489
-7%
749.82
-53%
1511 (1406 - 1632, n=9)
-6%
311 (12.1 - 1781, n=828)
-81%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.17.0: Ø59.5 (54-61)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.17.0: Ø39.6 (23-42)
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.33.1.5: Ø60.1 (60-61)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.33.1.5: Ø60 (48-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.1.2a: Ø57.1 (12-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.1.2a: Ø58.6 (39-61)
Carga Máxima
 44.6 °C43.9 °C40.4 °C 
 44.7 °C44.2 °C40.4 °C 
 44.8 °C42.9 °C39.8 °C 
Máximo: 44.8 °C
Médio: 42.9 °C
38.1 °C42.2 °C42.3 °C
37.9 °C42.9 °C43.6 °C
37.6 °C42.3 °C42.9 °C
Máximo: 43.6 °C
Médio: 41.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated); Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.348.92537.543.2312931.24031.631.25033.235.46328.329.98023.322.510023.323.312524.230.416020.541.52001948.225017.652.231516.954.440016.256.850016.463.363018.36680016.166100014.770.9125014.274.3160014.776.1200013.976.2250014.376.4315014.975.3400014.875.3500015.371.4630014.967.380001570.41000015.572.31250016.469.3160001672.4SPL75.372.427.585.6N3326.1160.9median 16median 69.3Delta29.332.239.436.225.529.126.83027.742.342.426.827.220.325.22536.717.244.817.954.317.153.817.95316.253.616.55615.35915.664.415.664.814.867.214.472.314.67314.776.914.176.414.476.914.475.914.973.514.773.814.57214.866.6156316.649.427.185.80.961median 15median 64.81.29.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S20+Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1 / 1.7 / 2.3 Watt
Carga midlight 5.8 / 11.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S20+
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Sony Xperia 1
3330 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-1%
22%
-40%
22%
7%
20%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.92
8%
0.87
13%
2.1
-110%
1
-0%
0.887 (0.76 - 1, n=3)
11%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=842)
12%
Idle Average *
1.7
2.9
-71%
1.75
-3%
3
-76%
1.48
13%
1.703 (1.5 - 1.91, n=3)
-0%
1.748 (0.6 - 6.2, n=841)
-3%
Idle Maximum *
2.3
2.94
-28%
1.83
20%
3.5
-52%
1.56
32%
2.09 (1.96 - 2.3, n=3)
9%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=842)
12%
Load Average *
5.8
3.65
37%
3.85
34%
5.3
9%
3.76
35%
5.11 (4.72 - 5.8, n=3)
12%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=836)
29%
Load Maximum *
11.8
6.18
48%
6.64
44%
8.3
30%
8.48
28%
11.2 (10.2 - 11.8, n=3)
5%
6.03 (1.2 - 14.2, n=836)
49%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
34h 01min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 18min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 38min
Samsung Galaxy S20+
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Sony Xperia 1
3330 mAh
Battery Runtime
42%
6%
11%
-27%
Reader / Idle
2041
2618
28%
2174
7%
2015
-1%
1067
-48%
H.264
978
1346
38%
1098
12%
957
-2%
712
-27%
WiFi v1.3
794
909
14%
823
4%
912
15%
441
-44%
Load
218
408
87%
219
0%
283
30%
246
13%

Pro

+ Tela muito brilhante
+ Tela de 120 Hz ótima de usar
+ Software moderno
+ Wi-Fi rápido
+ Gravação de vídeo em 8K...

Contra

- ...mas sem autofoco
- Limitações para vídeos de 60 FPS de 1080p para cima
- Baixo desempenho de navegação na web
- Forte afogamento sob carga
- Bloatware pré-instalado

Veredicto - Fraqueza da câmera

The Samsung Galaxy S20+ smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.
The Samsung Galaxy S20+ smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

O preço do Galaxy S20+ já caiu significativamente, logo após o lançamento da Samsung a 999 Euros (~US$ 1.093). Sem dúvida, essa é uma boa notícia para os consumidores, pois eles podem obter o mesmo smartphone gastando menos dinheiro. No entanto, os clientes europeus receberão um Galaxy S20+ que não corresponde ao seu potencial. Isso ocorre principalmente porque a Samsung equipa o dispositivo com o Exynos 990, seu chipset interno que fica aquém do Snapdragon 865 em muitas áreas. Em resumo, o Galaxy S20+ europeu tem conectividade 5G pior, maior afogamento sob carga e pior desempenho da CPU do que seu irmão Snapdragon 865. No geral, a versão do Galaxy S20+ com Snapdragon 865 seria o melhor dos dois dispositivos a comprar.

Pelo menos a duração da bateria do SoC Exynos está agora se aproximando lentamente do nível da concorrência. No entanto, o Exynos 990 é relativamente sedento de energia sob uso intenso sustentado. Você não deve esperar a melhor tecnologia de carregamento da Samsung com o Galaxy S20+, pois a empresa reserva isso para o Galaxy S20 Ultra. Em geral, tanto o Galaxy S20 quanto o Galaxy S20 Plus se sentem como uma redução significativa em comparação com o S20 Ultra.

Isto é principalmente devido às câmeras que a Samsung inclui. Sem um zoom óptico real, parece que a Samsung priorizou os recursos de vídeo de 8K em vez de uma lente telefoto adequada. No entanto, a empresa aplica muitas restrições à gravação de vídeo em 8K, como a incapacidade de aplicar zoom ou usar o foco automático. Da mesma forma, a Samsung restringe as opções que podem ser usadas ao gravar vídeos de 60 FPS em 1080p e superior.

As omissões da câmera são uma pena, pois o Galaxy S20+ tira fotos decentes. Da mesma forma, o One UI 2.1 se sente moderno e inclui as mais recentes correções de segurança, enquanto o dispositivo possui uma tela AMOLED brilhante e responsiva.

O Samsung Galaxy S20+ usa truques para esconder os pontos fracos de sua câmera. Sua ótima tela ainda faz valer a pena dar uma olhada.

Em resumo, você deve procurar outras opções se quiser a melhor câmera de smartphone. Manter-se fiel à Samsung o recompensará com um carro-chefe de alta qualidade que pode convencer com seu Wi-Fi, boa qualidade de chamada, precisão decente de GPS, qualidade de construção impressionante e duração da bateria.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Samsung Galaxy S20+ - 03/30/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
88%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
97%
Conectividade
52 / 70 → 74%
Peso
90%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
91%
Desempenho do jogos
57 / 64 → 88%
Desempenho da aplicação
75 / 86 → 87%
Temperatura
85%
Ruído
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
78%
Médio
81%
88%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S20+: Um telefone com recursos de vídeo de 8K
Florian Schmitt, 2020-04-12 (Update: 2020-04-23)
Alex Alderson
Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - News Editor - @aldersonaj