Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G7

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 02/16/2019

A jump ahead of its class. Comparado ao seu antecessor, o Motorola Moto G7 atinge novas alturas com mais desempenho e mais armazenamento. O preço continua o mesmo, o que torna o novo smartphone de gama média da Motorola muito atraente.

Motorola Moto G7 (Moto G7 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
6.2 polegadas 19:9, 2270 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 52 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 400 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B18/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 157 x 75.3
Bateria
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison AF, LED flash, videos @2160p/​30fps (main camera); 5.0 MP, f/​2.2, depth sharpness (secondary camera)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix videos @1080p/​30fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante na parte inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, USB-C; LTE Cat 4 (150Mbps/​50Mbps); SAR value: 0.45 W/kg (head), 1.376 W/kg (body); support for ExFAT, DRM Widevine L1, fanless
peso
172 g, Suprimento de energia: 77 g
Preço
249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Motorola Moto G7
Motorola Moto G7
Motorola Moto G7
Motorola Moto G7
Motorola Moto G7
Motorola Moto G7
Motorola Moto G7
Motorola Moto G7

Size Comparison

157 mm 75.3 mm 8 mm 172 g156.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.5 mm 169 g154.8 mm 73.6 mm 8 mm 162 g153.8 mm 72.3 mm 8.3 mm 167 g149.7 mm 71.2 mm 8 mm 160 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
356 (min: 342, max: 371) MBit/s ∼100% +218%
Nokia 7.1
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
334 (min: 311, max: 342) MBit/s ∼94% +198%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=351)
219 MBit/s ∼62% +96%
Motorola Moto G6
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼32% +1%
Motorola Moto G7
Adreno 506, 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (min: 94, max: 118) MBit/s ∼31%
Honor 10 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
48.4 (min: 42, max: 52) MBit/s ∼14% -57%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
285 (min: 142, max: 294) MBit/s ∼100% +154%
Nokia 7.1
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
232 (min: 217, max: 244) MBit/s ∼81% +107%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=351)
210 MBit/s ∼74% +88%
Motorola Moto G6
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼40% +1%
Motorola Moto G7
Adreno 506, 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (min: 107, max: 117) MBit/s ∼39%
Honor 10 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41.3 (min: 29, max: 56) MBit/s ∼14% -63%
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø112 (94-118)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø112 (107-117)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – traffic circle
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – traffic circle
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Motorola Moto G7 – overview
GPS Motorola Moto G7 – overview
GPS Motorola Moto G7 – traffic circle
GPS Motorola Moto G7 – traffic circle
GPS Motorola Moto G7 – bridge
GPS Motorola Moto G7 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Picture taken of the test chart
Picture taken of the test chart
Test chart detail
Test chart detail
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
ColorChecker: The target color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
455
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 471 cd/m² Médio: 453.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 471 cd/m²
Contraste: 942:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.326
Motorola Moto G7
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 6.26
Motorola Moto G6
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
Nokia 7.1
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
Honor 10 Lite
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21
Screen
15%
11%
-11%
16%
Brightness middle
471
421
-11%
488
4%
577
23%
467
-1%
Brightness
453
389
-14%
478
6%
550
21%
446
-2%
Brightness Distribution
94
85
-10%
95
1%
91
-3%
89
-5%
Black Level *
0.5
0.33
34%
0.42
16%
0.36
28%
0.58
-16%
Contrast
942
1276
35%
1162
23%
1603
70%
805
-15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.5
3.4
38%
3.9
29%
7.4
-35%
1.5
73%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.95
5.9
26%
6.8
14%
15
-89%
4.5
43%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5
3.9
22%
5.3
-6%
10.2
-104%
2.4
52%
Gamma
2.326 95%
2.26 97%
2.41 91%
2.29 96%
2.22 99%
CCT
7654 85%
7330 89%
7146 91%
9657 67%
6387 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 100 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9802 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.8 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4006 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5640 Points ∼100% +41%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2777 Points ∼49% -31%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
4560 Points ∼81% +14%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
3157 Points ∼56% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (3628 - 4058, n=4)
3863 Points ∼68% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 21070, n=241)
4641 Points ∼82% +16%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4765 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5893 Points ∼100% +24%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3868 Points ∼66% -19%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
4902 Points ∼83% +3%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5266 Points ∼89% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (4179 - 4765, n=4)
4546 Points ∼77% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1634 - 11598, n=293)
4448 Points ∼75% -7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1256 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1621 Points ∼100% +29%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
743 Points ∼46% -41%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1333 Points ∼82% +6%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1523 Points ∼94% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (1194 - 1256, n=4)
1238 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (590 - 4824, n=294)
1305 Points ∼81% +4%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6038 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6052 Points ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
4552 Points ∼75% -25%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
5663 Points ∼94% -6%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5803 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (5785 - 6076, n=4)
5957 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2828 - 9868, n=304)
4773 Points ∼79% -21%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
7187 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6274 Points ∼87% -13%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
5321 Points ∼74% -26%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
6343 Points ∼88% -12%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7160 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (6566 - 7498, n=4)
7143 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3977 - 13531, n=472)
5201 Points ∼72% -28%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2206 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2758 Points ∼100% +25%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1786 Points ∼65% -19%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2310 Points ∼84% +5%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2070 Points ∼75% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (2132 - 2260, n=3)
2199 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (939 - 4439, n=319)
1771 Points ∼64% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
467 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1265 Points ∼83% +171%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
413 Points ∼27% -12%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
869 Points ∼57% +86%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
839 Points ∼55% +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (423 - 477, n=3)
456 Points ∼30% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (138 - 8206, n=319)
1521 Points ∼100% +226%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
566 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1438 Points ∼100% +154%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
498 Points ∼35% -12%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1009 Points ∼70% +78%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
967 Points ∼67% +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (516 - 576, n=3)
553 Points ∼38% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (170 - 5913, n=322)
1415 Points ∼98% +150%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2201 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2751 Points ∼100% +25%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1816 Points ∼66% -17%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2347 Points ∼85% +7%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2067 Points ∼75% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (2130 - 2201, n=2)
2166 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=335)
1744 Points ∼63% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
809 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2015 Points ∼96% +149%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
713 Points ∼34% -12%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1396 Points ∼67% +73%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1246 Points ∼59% +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (809 - 812, n=2)
811 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=335)
2096 Points ∼100% +159%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
941 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2142 Points ∼100% +128%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
824 Points ∼38% -12%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1534 Points ∼72% +63%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1367 Points ∼64% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (941 - 941, n=2)
941 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7856, n=336)
1774 Points ∼83% +89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2251 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2759 Points ∼100% +23%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1834 Points ∼66% -19%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2251 Points ∼82% 0%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2326 Points ∼84% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (2166 - 2260, n=3)
2226 Points ∼81% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (918 - 4216, n=395)
1704 Points ∼62% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
419 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1193 Points ∼96% +185%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
363 Points ∼29% -13%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
811 Points ∼65% +94%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
683 Points ∼55% +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (0 - 430, n=4)
318 Points ∼26% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6355, n=397)
1244 Points ∼100% +197%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
512 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1365 Points ∼100% +167%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
442 Points ∼32% -14%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
945 Points ∼69% +85%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
810 Points ∼59% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (512 - 523, n=3)
517 Points ∼38% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (184 - 5509, n=405)
1190 Points ∼87% +132%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2273 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2719 Points ∼100% +20%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1803 Points ∼66% -21%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2316 Points ∼85% +2%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2282 Points ∼84% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (2134 - 2309, n=3)
2239 Points ∼82% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4215, n=429)
1603 Points ∼59% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
780 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1929 Points ∼100% +147%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
690 Points ∼36% -12%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1323 Points ∼69% +70%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1137 Points ∼59% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (780 - 799, n=3)
790 Points ∼41% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 9963, n=429)
1693 Points ∼88% +117%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
913 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2062 Points ∼100% +126%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
800 Points ∼39% -12%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1462 Points ∼71% +60%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1280 Points ∼62% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (913 - 935, n=3)
923 Points ∼45% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7166, n=437)
1448 Points ∼70% +59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
16647 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
20437 Points ∼100% +23%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13997 Points ∼68% -16%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
17274 Points ∼85% +4%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
11211 Points ∼55% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (15250 - 16647, n=4)
16159 Points ∼79% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3958 - 37475, n=588)
13273 Points ∼65% -20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
14475 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
29116 Points ∼100% +101%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12441 Points ∼43% -14%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
20610 Points ∼71% +42%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19546 Points ∼67% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (14395 - 14603, n=4)
14500 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1152 - 162695, n=588)
18995 Points ∼65% +31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
14907 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
26605 Points ∼100% +78%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12756 Points ∼48% -14%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
19762 Points ∼74% +33%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
16775 Points ∼63% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (14577 - 15000, n=4)
14836 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2915 - 77599, n=589)
15910 Points ∼60% +7%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
24 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
50 fps ∼100% +108%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
22 fps ∼44% -8%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
35 fps ∼70% +46%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
39 fps ∼78% +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (24 - 24, n=4)
24 fps ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.1 - 251, n=612)
33 fps ∼66% +38%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
23 fps ∼49%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
47 fps ∼100% +104%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
20 fps ∼43% -13%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
34 fps ∼72% +48%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
36 fps ∼77% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (23 - 37, n=4)
33.3 fps ∼71% +45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.9 - 120, n=615)
26 fps ∼55% +13%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
10 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +120%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
9.4 fps ∼43% -6%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
16 fps ∼73% +60%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
21 fps ∼95% +110%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (10 - 11, n=4)
10.3 fps ∼47% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.2 - 132, n=533)
17.8 fps ∼81% +78%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
9.9 fps ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +112%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
8.9 fps ∼42% -10%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
15 fps ∼71% +52%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19 fps ∼90% +92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (9.9 - 20, n=4)
17 fps ∼81% +72%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.1 - 115, n=537)
16.8 fps ∼80% +70%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6.9 fps ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
15 fps ∼99% +117%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.1 fps ∼40% -12%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
10 fps ∼66% +45%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
14 fps ∼93% +103%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (6.9 - 7, n=4)
6.93 fps ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.6 - 88, n=394)
15.1 fps ∼100% +119%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6.5 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
14 fps ∼97% +115%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
5.8 fps ∼40% -11%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
9.6 fps ∼66% +48%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
13 fps ∼90% +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (6.5 - 15, n=4)
12.6 fps ∼87% +94%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.5 - 110, n=397)
14.5 fps ∼100% +123%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2 fps ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5.1 fps ∼55% +155%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
3.5 fps ∼38% +75%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
4 fps ∼43% +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (2 - 4.3, n=3)
3.5 fps ∼38% +75%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 59, n=98)
9.3 fps ∼100% +365%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1.2 fps ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
3.2 fps ∼49% +167%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2.2 fps ∼34% +83%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2.6 fps ∼40% +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (1.2 - 1.3, n=3)
1.267 fps ∼20% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 31, n=98)
6.47 fps ∼100% +439%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.6 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.1 fps ∼58% +125%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
5.5 fps ∼39% +53%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.4 fps ∼46% +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (3.6 - 6.8, n=3)
5.7 fps ∼41% +58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 59, n=98)
14 fps ∼100% +289%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.9 fps ∼25%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.5 fps ∼55% +118%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
6 fps ∼39% +54%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7 fps ∼45% +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (3.8 - 3.9, n=3)
3.87 fps ∼25% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.77 - 63, n=97)
15.4 fps ∼100% +295%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.9 fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
9 fps ∼88% +131%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.4 fps ∼33% -13%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
6.3 fps ∼62% +62%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7.6 fps ∼75% +95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (3.9 - 3.9, n=4)
3.9 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9 - 54, n=324)
10.2 fps ∼100% +162%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.6 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.4 fps ∼91% +133%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.3 fps ∼36% -8%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
5.9 fps ∼64% +64%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.8 fps ∼73% +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (3.6 - 7.9, n=4)
6.75 fps ∼73% +88%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 58, n=327)
9.26 fps ∼100% +157%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
108408 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
143551 Points ∼100% +32%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
71352 Points ∼50% -34%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
116496 Points ∼81% +7%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
129928 Points ∼91% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (97294 - 108408, n=4)
103814 Points ∼72% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (41483 - 374820, n=217)
123485 Points ∼86% +14%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
87883 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
118773 Points ∼100% +35%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
59454 Points ∼50% -32%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
95013 Points ∼80% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (76724 - 87883, n=3)
83461 Points ∼70% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 273655, n=431)
80811 Points ∼68% -8%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1008 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1086 Points ∼100% +8%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
688 Points ∼63% -32%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1046 Points ∼96% +4%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1004 Points ∼92% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (1008 - 1078, n=4)
1041 Points ∼96% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=545)
717 Points ∼66% -29%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1075 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2293 Points ∼100% +113%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
965 Points ∼42% -10%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1590 Points ∼69% +48%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1470 Points ∼64% +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (1069 - 1081, n=4)
1074 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=545)
1831 Points ∼80% +70%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1963 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2269 Points ∼76% +16%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
770 Points ∼26% -61%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1917 Points ∼65% -2%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2969 Points ∼100% +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (1068 - 2049, n=4)
1712 Points ∼58% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6283, n=545)
1339 Points ∼45% -32%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4378 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5237 Points ∼100% +20%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2560 Points ∼49% -42%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
4457 Points ∼85% +2%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5026 Points ∼96% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (3865 - 4399, n=4)
4237 Points ∼81% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=545)
2684 Points ∼51% -39%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1747 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2332 Points ∼100% +33%
Motorola Moto G6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1069 Points ∼46% -39%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1941 Points ∼83% +11%
Honor 10 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2167 Points ∼93% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
  (1465 - 1800, n=4)
1679 Points ∼72% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=549)
1332 Points ∼57% -24%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
52.897 Points ∼100% +16%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
49.221 Points ∼93% +8%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
45.541 Points ∼86%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)
45.08 Points ∼85% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (42.6 - 45.5, n=4)
44.2 Points ∼84% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 273, n=470)
37.8 Points ∼71% -17%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
22.556 Points ∼43% -50%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
10378 Points ∼100% +24%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
9423 Points ∼91% +13%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)
8627 Points ∼83% +3%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
8351 Points ∼80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (8185 - 8420, n=4)
8296 Points ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=606)
5871 Points ∼57% -30%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
3943 Points ∼38% -53%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
11751.4 ms * ∼100% -140%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=625)
11133 ms * ∼95% -127%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
4900 ms * ∼42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (4806 - 4900, n=3)
4867 ms * ∼41% +1%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)
4562.2 ms * ∼39% +7%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
4119.7 ms * ∼35% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
3879.5 ms * ∼33% +21%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (24 - 161, n=85)
64.8 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
62 Points ∼96% +7%
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
62 Points ∼96% +7%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
58 Points ∼90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
58 Points ∼90% 0%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)
54 Points ∼83% -7%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
31 Points ∼48% -47%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Honor 10 Lite (Chrome 71)
178 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
171 Points ∼96% 0%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
171 Points ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (163 - 171, n=2)
167 Points ∼94% -2%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)
147 Points ∼83% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 362, n=309)
117 Points ∼66% -32%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
90 Points ∼51% -47%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G7Xiaomi Mi 8 LiteMotorola Moto G6Nokia 7.1Honor 10 LiteAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-15%
-18%
-32%
-13%
-26%
-42%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
61.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
61.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
66.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
55.1 (59.5 - 74.7, n=87)
-18%
47.1 (19.2 - 87.1, n=357)
-29%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
86.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
75.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
83.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
75.78 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
73.4 (83.2 - 87.2, n=87)
-16%
65.3 (29.8 - 96.5, n=357)
-25%
Random Write 4KB
75.6
18.75
-75%
59.91
-21%
11.93
-84%
66.06
-13%
22.7 (3.4 - 88.2, n=96)
-70%
18.3 (0.14 - 250, n=654)
-76%
Random Read 4KB
69.3
81.25
17%
69.91
1%
44.9
-35%
45.15
-35%
52.8 (11.4 - 149, n=96)
-24%
41.5 (1.59 - 173, n=654)
-40%
Sequential Write 256KB
216
172.43
-20%
117.19
-46%
125.98
-42%
190.55
-12%
171 (40 - 246, n=96)
-21%
86.5 (2.99 - 388, n=654)
-60%
Sequential Read 256KB
297
282.62
-5%
238.23
-20%
250.9
-16%
288.55
-3%
272 (115 - 704, n=96)
-8%
242 (12.1 - 912, n=654)
-19%
0102030405060Tooltip
Motorola Moto G7 Adreno 506, 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.3.1a: Ø28.1 (24-31)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality: Ø28.2 (25-31)
Nokia 7.1 Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality: Ø29.4 (23-31)
Honor 10 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality: Ø29.8 (28-31)
Motorola Moto G7 Adreno 506, 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.3.1a: Ø26.2 (18-30)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low: Ø28.3 (24-30)
Nokia 7.1 Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low: Ø29.7 (27-31)
Honor 10 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low: Ø29.9 (29-31)
Motorola Moto G7 Adreno 506, 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; min; 1.27.1.2: Ø31.2 (30-32)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; min: Ø59.9 (55-60)
Motorola Moto G6 Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; min; 1.21.1.2: Ø30.7 (12-32)
Nokia 7.1 Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; min: Ø30.9 (29-32)
Honor 10 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; min: Ø31.2 (29-32)
Motorola Moto G7 Adreno 506, 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.27.1.2: Ø30.7 (29-31)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD: Ø59.5 (49-60)
Motorola Moto G6 Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.21.1.2: Ø29.7 (22-31)
Nokia 7.1 Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD: Ø30.4 (29-31)
Honor 10 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD: Ø30.7 (27-32)
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min31 fps
 high HD31 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Asphalt 9: Legends
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 High Quality28 fps
 Standard / low26 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 32.4 °C33.5 °C34.4 °C 
 32.5 °C33 °C34.4 °C 
 31.9 °C32.5 °C34.2 °C 
Máximo: 34.4 °C
Médio: 33.2 °C
32.5 °C33.4 °C33.1 °C
32.4 °C32.7 °C33.1 °C
32.4 °C32.7 °C32.1 °C
Máximo: 33.4 °C
Médio: 32.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  40.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.735.62537.138.73133.733.34037.433.45036.336.86328.329.98023.726.410023.224.11252230.516020.442.220018.445.425017.75031517.354.840017.759.250018.161.66302066.280016.367.1100015.575125014.177160014.174.6200014.571.7250014.366.531501565.2400014.765.8500016.965.8630015.369.280001573.61000014.573.21250014.758.21600014.555.9SPL6727.983.4N19.4154.5median 15.5median 65.8Delta2.38.236.537.838.233.635.836.12937.53436.333.830.127.230.428.627.928.933.427.748.326.65221.860.822.562.821.363.321.466.719.168.318.966.719.768.918.772.718.471.119.173.218.676.919.878.619.57819.278.81977.119.175.419.375.519.971.919.861.831.787.41.770median 19.7median 68.91.97.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G7Motorola Moto G6
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Motorola Moto G6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.1 / 1.8 / 2.6 Watt
Carga midlight 4.2 / 6.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G7
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3350 mAh
Motorola Moto G6
3000 mAh
Nokia 7.1
3060 mAh
Honor 10 Lite
3400 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
4%
29%
5%
-4%
1%
13%
Idle Minimum *
1.1
0.56
49%
0.6
45%
1.01
8%
1
9%
1.067 (1 - 1.1, n=3)
3%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=684)
20%
Idle Average *
1.8
1.99
-11%
1.81
-1%
2.2
-22%
2.19
-22%
1.8 (1.7 - 1.9, n=3)
-0%
1.73 (0.6 - 6.2, n=683)
4%
Idle Maximum *
2.6
2.05
21%
1.86
28%
2.25
13%
2.2
15%
2.67 (2.6 - 2.8, n=3)
-3%
2.01 (0.74 - 6.6, n=684)
23%
Load Average *
4.2
4.62
-10%
2.78
34%
3.76
10%
4.64
-10%
4.13 (4.1 - 4.2, n=3)
2%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=678)
3%
Load Maximum *
6.8
8.94
-31%
4.04
41%
5.56
18%
7.7
-13%
6.73 (6.5 - 6.9, n=3)
1%
5.84 (1.2 - 14.2, n=678)
14%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
25h 48min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 39min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 39min
Motorola Moto G7
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3350 mAh
Motorola Moto G6
3000 mAh
Nokia 7.1
3060 mAh
Honor 10 Lite
3400 mAh
Battery Runtime
-19%
-7%
-40%
-25%
Reader / Idle
1548
1678
8%
1170
-24%
983
-36%
1533
-1%
H.264
819
662
-19%
600
-27%
507
-38%
502
-39%
WiFi v1.3
798
547
-31%
553
-31%
346
-57%
484
-39%
Load
219
150
-32%
338
54%
156
-29%
178
-19%

Pro

+ Boas câmeras
+ Gravação de vídeo em 4K
+ É possível a transmissão em HD
+ Boa duração da bateria WLAN
+ SoC sem limitação de desempenho
+ Carcaça de alta qualidade

Contra

- Estabilidade da carcaça menos que perfeita
- WLAN lento
- Microfone com cortes
- Não muito fluente durante os jogos
- A tela tem uma tonalidade azul
Testing the Motorola Moto G7. Test unit provided by Motorola Germany.
Testing the Motorola Moto G7. Test unit provided by Motorola Germany.

Com seu SoC mais potente e a boa qualidade da câmera, o Moto G7 salta um pouco à frente de sua classe, sendo capaz de acompanhar dispositivos ainda mais caros. Como a tela também continua a oferecer um desempenho decente, a carcaça com suas superfícies de vidro toma emprestado da gama alta, e o equipamento de armazenamento é generoso, atestamos o smartphone Motorola com uma excelente relação preço-desempenho.

Temos que procurar pontos fracos: particularmente durante a operação viva voz, o microfone não é muito preciso, a estabilidade da carcaça poderia ter sido melhor, e as velocidades de WLAN e a adequação para jogos são apenas medíocres. Por uma quantidade semelhante de dinheiro, você pode obter dispositivos ainda mais poderosos, como o Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite ou o Nokia 7.1.

No ano passado, teríamos procurado mais na gama alta para muitos detalhes do Motorola Moto G7. Juntamente com o seu baixo preço, isso resulta em muito smartphone por pouco dinheiro.

Nem todos os dispositivos de gama média acessíveis podem oferecer vídeos em 4K, um SoC que não seja limitado, uma bateria de longa duração no teste de WLAN e recursos de localização decentes. Por isso, o Moto G7 recebe uma recomendação clara de nós para todos aqueles que estão procurando um smartphone de gama média confiável e poderoso.

Motorola Moto G7 - 02/15/2019 v6
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
89%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
41 / 60 → 68%
Peso
90%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
30 / 63 → 47%
Desempenho da aplicação
61 / 70 → 87%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
79%
Médio
76%
85%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G7
Florian Schmitt, 2019-02-16 (Update: 2019-02-19)