Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone ZTE Blade V8

Niklas Böhm (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/25/2017

Um grande da gama média. O fabricante chinês entra no seguinte round da luta pela coroa do preço-baixo com o ZTE Blade V8. Com um preço recomendado de 269 Euros (~$291), o novo aparelho parece ser uma barganha e as especificações técnicas permitem que o coração bata mais rápido. Leia se esse sentimento de prazer pode ser mantido durante todo o teste.

ZTE Blade V8 (Blade Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 1.4 GHz
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 505, Análises do: 450 MHz
Memória
3072 MB 
, 2GB ou 3GB
Pantalha
5.2 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 424 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Suporte multitouch para 5 dedos, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.25 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5-mm, Card Reader: microSD, até 256GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Leitor de digitais (frontal), acelerômetro, gyro, proximidade, bússola, micro-USB
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM, HSPA, LTE, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 148 x 72
Bateria
2730 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 19 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 19 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 450 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 450 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 13M AF +2M FF com flash
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante com suporte para som Dolby, Teclado: virtual, carregador e caboe, headset, SIM tool, guia de início rápidos, cartão de garantia, MiFavor 4.2, 24 Meses Garantia, micro-USB SAR rates: body: 1.500 W/kg a 5 mm de distância head: 0.374 W/kg a 5 mm de distância, fanless
peso
142 g, Suprimento de energia: 45 g
Preço
230 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Honor 6X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.6 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
ZTE Blade V8
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s ∼100%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Honor 6X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash
57.9 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.9 MBit/s ∼95% +3%
ZTE Blade V8
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.2 MBit/s ∼92%
Bokeh photo
Bokeh photo
Bokeh photo
Bokeh photo

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
393
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
404
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 496 cd/m² Médio: 448.1 cd/m² Minimum: 15.89 cd/m²
iluminação: 79 %
iluminação com acumulador: 482 cd/m²
Contraste: 753:1 (Preto: 0.64 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.13
ZTE Blade V8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei P9 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Honor 6X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
ZTE Blade V7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Screen
-10%
-5%
-43%
-46%
Brightness
448
468
4%
540
21%
335
-25%
411
-8%
Brightness Distribution
79
88
11%
94
19%
94
19%
96
22%
Black Level *
0.64
0.74
-16%
0.57
11%
0.38
41%
Contrast
753
682
-9%
960
27%
1076
43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4
4.1
-3%
5.1
-28%
6.3
-58%
9.4
-135%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.4
4.9
-44%
6.2
-82%
7.1
-109%
11.6
-241%
Gamma
2.13 113%
2.5 96%
2.09 115%
2.25 107%
2.25 107%
CCT
6774 96%
7116 91%
6546 99%
7637 85%
9597 68%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 5435 Hz1 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 5435 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 5435 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.4 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
45868 Points ∼20%
Huawei P9 Lite
50366 Points ∼22% +10%
Honor 6X
56764 Points ∼25% +24%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
46968 Points ∼21% +2%
ZTE Blade V7
37070 Points ∼16% -19%
Wiko U Feel Prime
44420 Points ∼19% -3%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
2308 Points ∼8%
Honor 6X
3341 Points ∼12% +45%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
2092 Points ∼8% -9%
Wiko U Feel Prime
2085 Points ∼8% -10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
577 Points ∼10%
Honor 6X
788 Points ∼14% +37%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
698 Points ∼12% +21%
Wiko U Feel Prime
644 Points ∼11% +12%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
1214 Points ∼40%
Huawei P9 Lite
1370 Points ∼45% +13%
Honor 6X
1440 Points ∼48% +19%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
1121 Points ∼37% -8%
ZTE Blade V7
914 Points ∼30% -25%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1034 Points ∼34% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
263 Points ∼5%
Huawei P9 Lite
305 Points ∼6% +16%
Honor 6X
318 Points ∼6% +21%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
327 Points ∼6% +24%
ZTE Blade V7
159 Points ∼3% -40%
Wiko U Feel Prime
250 Points ∼5% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
318 Points ∼8%
Huawei P9 Lite
369 Points ∼10% +16%
Honor 6X
385 Points ∼10% +21%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
388 Points ∼10% +22%
ZTE Blade V7
195 Points ∼5% -39%
Wiko U Feel Prime
301 Points ∼8% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
1127 Points ∼37%
Huawei P9 Lite
1373 Points ∼46% +22%
Honor 6X
1433 Points ∼48% +27%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
1102 Points ∼37% -2%
ZTE Blade V7
944 Points ∼31% -16%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1118 Points ∼37% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
542 Points ∼7%
Huawei P9 Lite
473 Points ∼6% -13%
Honor 6X
468 Points ∼6% -14%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
606 Points ∼8% +12%
ZTE Blade V7
245 Points ∼3% -55%
Wiko U Feel Prime
514 Points ∼7% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
613 Points ∼12%
Huawei P9 Lite
554 Points ∼11% -10%
Honor 6X
550 Points ∼11% -10%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
673 Points ∼14% +10%
ZTE Blade V7
293 Points ∼6% -52%
Wiko U Feel Prime
584 Points ∼12% -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
8905 Points ∼12%
Huawei P9 Lite
13676 Points ∼19% +54%
Honor 6X
13535 Points ∼19% +52%
Honor 6X
13535 Points ∼19% +52%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
9670 Points ∼13% +9%
ZTE Blade V7
10430 Points ∼14% +17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
10271 Points ∼2%
Huawei P9 Lite
11318 Points ∼2% +10%
Honor 6X
11353 Points ∼2% +11%
Honor 6X
11353 Points ∼2% +11%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
9913 Points ∼2% -3%
ZTE Blade V7
6170 Points ∼1% -40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
9932 Points ∼5%
Huawei P9 Lite
11769 Points ∼6% +18%
Honor 6X
11775 Points ∼6% +19%
Honor 6X
11775 Points ∼6% +19%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
9858 Points ∼5% -1%
ZTE Blade V7
6786 Points ∼3% -32%
Wiko U Feel Prime
9548 Points ∼5% -4%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
11 fps ∼1%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps ∼1% +73%
Honor 6X
18 fps ∼1% +64%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
17 fps ∼1% +55%
ZTE Blade V7
12 fps ∼1% +9%
Wiko U Feel Prime
17 fps ∼1% +55%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
9.7 fps ∼2%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps ∼4% +96%
Honor 6X
19 fps ∼4% +96%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
18 fps ∼4% +86%
ZTE Blade V7
12 fps ∼3% +24%
Wiko U Feel Prime
16 fps ∼3% +65%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
4.6 fps ∼1%
Huawei P9 Lite
7.8 fps ∼1% +70%
Honor 6X
4.6 fps ∼1% 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
6.7 fps ∼1% +46%
ZTE Blade V7
4.5 fps ∼1% -2%
Wiko U Feel Prime
7.1 fps ∼1% +54%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
4.5 fps ∼1%
Huawei P9 Lite
8.4 fps ∼2% +87%
Honor 6X
8.5 fps ∼2% +89%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
7 fps ∼2% +56%
ZTE Blade V7
4.5 fps ∼1% 0%
Wiko U Feel Prime
7.5 fps ∼2% +67%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
2.4 fps ∼1%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.5 fps ∼1% +88%
Honor 6X
2.5 fps ∼1% +4%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
4.2 fps ∼1% +75%
ZTE Blade V7
2.9 fps ∼1% +21%
Wiko U Feel Prime
4.4 fps ∼1% +83%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
4.9 fps ∼3%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.9 fps ∼3% 0%
Honor 6X
4.9 fps ∼3% 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
4.5 fps ∼3% -8%
ZTE Blade V7
2.9 fps ∼2% -41%
Wiko U Feel Prime
4.8 fps ∼3% -2%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
4978 Points ∼60%
Huawei P9 Lite
5339 Points ∼64% +7%
Honor 6X
4383 Points ∼53% -12%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
3663 Points ∼44% -26%
ZTE Blade V7
3947 Points ∼48% -21%
Wiko U Feel Prime
3347 Points ∼40% -33%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
744 Points ∼48%
Huawei P9 Lite
765 Points ∼50% +3%
Honor 6X
720 Points ∼47% -3%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
10 Points ∼1% -99%
ZTE Blade V7
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Wiko U Feel Prime
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
787 Points ∼9%
Huawei P9 Lite
818 Points ∼10% +4%
Honor 6X
819 Points ∼10% +4%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
827 Points ∼10% +5%
ZTE Blade V7
430 Points ∼5% -45%
Wiko U Feel Prime
740 Points ∼9% -6%
Memory (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
812 Points ∼18%
Huawei P9 Lite
1346 Points ∼30% +66%
Honor 6X
1779 Points ∼40% +119%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
1052 Points ∼24% +30%
ZTE Blade V7
790 Points ∼18% -3%
Wiko U Feel Prime
774 Points ∼17% -5%
System (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
1562 Points ∼24%
Huawei P9 Lite
2438 Points ∼37% +56%
Honor 6X
2721 Points ∼41% +74%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
1379 Points ∼21% -12%
ZTE Blade V7
1188 Points ∼18% -24%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1281 Points ∼19% -18%
Overall (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
928 Points ∼24%
Huawei P9 Lite
1197 Points ∼32% +29%
Honor 6X
1300 Points ∼34% +40%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
328 Points ∼9% -65%
ZTE Blade V7
249 Points ∼7% -73%
Wiko U Feel Prime
290 Points ∼8% -69%

Legend

 
ZTE Blade V8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 6X HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Axon 7 Mini Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko U Feel Prime Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei P9 Lite
29.03 Points ∼100% +66%
Honor 6X
26.464 Points ∼91% +51%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
23 Points ∼79% +31%
Wiko U Feel Prime
21.4 Points ∼74% +22%
ZTE Blade V7
18.19 Points ∼63% +4%
ZTE Blade V8
17.524 Points ∼60%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
ZTE Blade V7
13761.1 ms * ∼100% -12%
ZTE Blade V8
12297.4 ms * ∼89%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
11109.2 ms * ∼81% +10%
Wiko U Feel Prime
10826 ms * ∼79% +12%
Huawei P9 Lite
9396.5 ms * ∼68% +24%
Honor 6X
9373.3 ms * ∼68% +24%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P9 Lite
4756 Points ∼100% +68%
Honor 6X
4199 Points ∼88% +49%
Wiko U Feel Prime
3383 Points ∼71% +20%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
3371 Points ∼71% +19%
ZTE Blade V8
2826 Points ∼59%
ZTE Blade V7
2689 Points ∼57% -5%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Honor 6X
73 Points ∼100% +38%
Huawei P9 Lite
67 Points ∼92% +26%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
54 Points ∼74% +2%
ZTE Blade V8
53 Points ∼73%

* ... smaller is better

ZTE Blade V8Huawei P9 LiteHonor 6XZTE Axon 7 MiniZTE Blade V7Wiko U Feel Prime
AndroBench 3-5
-22%
24%
-23%
-47%
-5%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
87.13
25.1
-71%
34.53
-60%
50.27
-42%
20.89
-76%
35.21
-60%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
96.47
60.81
-37%
52.02
-46%
73.89
-23%
43.67
-55%
41.98
-56%
Random Write 4KB
12.69
15.35
21%
45.05
255%
6.7
-47%
7.58
-40%
9.4
-26%
Random Read 4KB
39.89
38.22
-4%
39.55
-1%
14.05
-65%
28.07
-30%
55
38%
Sequential Write 256KB
77.7
46.24
-40%
73.85
-5%
122.84
58%
39.45
-49%
137.3
77%
Sequential Read 256KB
278.06
283.55
2%
283.37
2%
230.82
-17%
196.76
-29%
270.9
-3%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high19 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máxima
 34.1 °C34.3 °C36.3 °C 
 33.9 °C33.2 °C36.5 °C 
 32.5 °C32.9 °C35.3 °C 
Máximo: 36.5 °C
Médio: 34.3 °C
32.1 °C33.1 °C33.3 °C
32.4 °C32.8 °C33.3 °C
31.2 °C32.7 °C33.3 °C
Máximo: 33.3 °C
Médio: 32.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  32.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.640.62525.4383125.330.54032.931.85033.632.86331.634.18028.428.4100272812520.828.31602226.520021.331.625020.838.531521.246.840019.453.450019.556.763017.760.280017.960.6100017.870.4125017.372.2160017.471.4200016.768.3250017.268.8315018.267.5400017.973.1500017.674.2630017.771.2800017.862.81000017.956.91250018.1541600018.238.7SPL3081.8N1.347.9median 17.9ZTE Blade V8median 60.2Delta1.314.440.731.832.440.732.731.831.332.730.834.231.730.831.830.42631.836.633.139.436.633.330.936.233.332.42528.632.429.624.325.429.631.523.921.331.536.324.323.336.344.329.822.544.352.236.622.452.257.341.721.357.362.747.118.462.764.950.117.564.96752.517.56769.153.917.269.17254.216.8727454.217.37475.755.317.475.775.756.916.675.776.157.817.376.17757.917.67779.159.517.679.180.161.117.780.178.359.417.478.377.358.417.777.378.859.717.978.872.953.518.172.956.83718.156.888.469.529.888.473.724.21.373.7median 72Huawei P9 Litemedian 53.9median 17.7median 7211.19.91.611.131.642.625.437.525.334.632.931.333.630.931.632.428.429.72728.420.829.22231.721.336.920.84621.252.319.455.819.559.117.760.817.966.617.871.517.37517.472.316.772.717.271.618.270.717.967.617.666.617.761.617.856.517.957.118.156.918.242.23081.91.346.3median 17.9Honor 6Xmedian 59.11.311hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
ZTE Blade V8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei P9 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.42 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Honor 6X audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.07 / 0.49 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.98 / 1.76 / 1.79 Watt
Carga midlight 2.89 / 5.62 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
16h 04min
Navegar com WLAN
0h 00min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
11h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 05min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 57min
ZTE Blade V8
2730 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Honor 6X
3340 mAh
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
2705 mAh
ZTE Blade V7
2540 mAh
Battery Runtime
7%
65%
-16%
-26%
Reader / Idle
964
1404
46%
2250
133%
1287
34%
H.264
545
568
4%
885
62%
435
-20%
WiFi v1.3
700
604
-14%
957
37%
399
-43%
519
-26%
Load
297
272
-8%
375
26%
196
-34%

Pro

+ Preço baixo
+ Dual-câmera
+ Câmera frontal com 13 megapixels
+ Leitor de digitais
+ Suporte para som Dolby
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Suporte para micro-SD (teoricamente) de até 2 TB
+ Dual-SIM

Contra

- Taxas de desempenho médias
- Adequado apenas para jogos padrão
- Headset massivo
- Alto falantes fracos no modo padrão
In review: ZTE Blade V8. Review sample courtesy of ZTE Germany
In review: ZTE Blade V8. Review sample courtesy of ZTE Germany

No final deste teste, surge a questão sobre para quem é este aparelho. Principalmente para os caçadores de pechinchas que querem um monte de recursos por pouco dinheiro. Esses compradores recebem uma câmera dupla e uma câmera frontal de 13 megapixels. Suporte para áudio Dolby está disponível para os alto falantes. Uma boa duração da bateria, boa tela e expansão de armazenamento via micro-SD também pertence ao pacote.

O Blade V8 é um smartphone que traz bom desempenho para a gama média a um preço baixo.

E o ruim? Os compradores devem estar cientes de que este não é um smartphone premium, apesar da carcaça de alumínio. A configuração atual é bastante média, mas não mais que isso. Deve optar por um modelo mais caro se desejar mais potência e uma melhor configuração. As taxas de desempenho medíocres na comparação do desempenho são realmente o maior ponto de crítica. Infelizmente, os alto-falantes são muito fracos sem Dolby Audio, e isso resulta na falta de volume. A câmera apresenta fraquezas evidentes em situações de baixa iluminação.

ZTE Blade V8 - 03/29/2017 v6
Niklas Böhm

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
39 / 60 → 66%
Peso
93%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
16 / 63 → 26%
Desempenho da aplicação
43 / 70 → 62%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
68%
Médio
72%
82%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone ZTE Blade V8
Niklas Böhm, 2017-04-25 (Update: 2017-04-28)