Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone ZTE Axon 7 Mini

Andreas Osthoff (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/26/2016

Será que a versão Mini é tudo o que você precisa? Além do modelo carro-chefe Axon 7, o fabricante chinês mais uma vez oferece uma versão Mini do modelo atual. Além do tamanho e dos recursos, o preço também foi reduzido. Mas será que o Axon 7 Mini compete com os rivais fortes?

ZTE Axon 7 Mini (Axon Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 405
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
5.2 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 424 PPI, Capacitiva, 10 pontos de toque, AMOLED, Gorilla-Glass 4, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (compartilhada, até 128GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Proximidade Hall, Giroscópio, USB-OTG, WiFi-Direct, DLNA, SAR Body: 0.75 W/kg
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G GSM (Bandas 2/3/5/8), 3G UMTS (Bandas 1/2/4/5/8), 4G LTE Cat.6 (FDD Bandas 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/20, TDD Bands 38/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.8 x 147.5 x 71
Bateria
2705 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 18 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 15 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 480 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 550 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/​1.9, PD-Autofocus, Dual-LED flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.2, Fixfocus, Videos @1080p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo (Dolby Atmos), Teclado: Virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força USB modular, Cabo USB-C, Headset, Ferramenta SIM, Folhetos de serviço, cartão de garantia, cobertura protetora, MiFavor 4.0, Tools, WPS Office, 36 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
153 g, Suprimento de energia: 69 g
Preço
299 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
337 MBit/s ∼100% +539%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
320 MBit/s ∼95% +507%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s ∼83% +433%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 MBit/s ∼16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32.9 MBit/s ∼10% -38%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s ∼100% +510%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
323 MBit/s ∼96% +488%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
298 MBit/s ∼89% +443%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.9 MBit/s ∼16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31.2 MBit/s ∼9% -43%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini: overview
ZTE Axon 7 Mini: overview
ZTE Axon 7 Mini: crossing
ZTE Axon 7 Mini: crossing
ZTE Axon 7 Mini: turning point
ZTE Axon 7 Mini: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: crossing
Garmin Edge 500: crossing
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
332
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
329
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 349 cd/m² Médio: 334.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.79 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 327 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.3 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.25
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
BlackBerry DTEK50
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei P9 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Sony Xperia XA
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.7
ZTE Blade V7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Screen
32%
41%
25%
5%
44%
-22%
Brightness
335
511
53%
589
76%
468
40%
475
42%
394
18%
411
23%
Brightness Distribution
94
89
-5%
87
-7%
88
-6%
81
-14%
88
-6%
96
2%
Black Level *
0.89
0.63
0.74
0.61
0.38
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.3
4.3
32%
3.8
40%
4.1
35%
6.8
-8%
1.11
82%
9.4
-49%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.1
3.6
49%
3.1
56%
4.9
31%
7
1%
1.34
81%
11.6
-63%
Gamma
2.25 107%
2.21 109%
2.06 117%
2.5 96%
2.35 102%
2.12 113%
2.25 107%
CCT
7637 85%
6352 102%
6725 97%
7116 91%
8151 80%
6441 101%
9597 68%
Contrast
601
967
682
849
1076

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 238.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5069 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
50366 Points ∼100% +7%
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
48331 Points ∼96% +3%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
46968 Points ∼93%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
45232 Points ∼90% -4%
BlackBerry DTEK50
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
40876 Points ∼81% -13%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
37070 Points ∼74% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536
35964 Points ∼71% -23%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
1373 Points ∼100% +25%
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
1259 Points ∼92% +14%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
1102 Points ∼80%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
1042 Points ∼76% -5%
BlackBerry DTEK50
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
957 Points ∼70% -13%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
944 Points ∼69% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536
916 Points ∼67% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
606 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
605 Points ∼100% 0%
BlackBerry DTEK50
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
568 Points ∼94% -6%
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
525 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
473 Points ∼78% -22%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
245 Points ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536
235 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
673 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
667 Points ∼99% -1%
BlackBerry DTEK50
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
624 Points ∼93% -7%
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
603 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
554 Points ∼82% -18%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
293 Points ∼44% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536
281 Points ∼42% -58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
13676 Points ∼100% +41%
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
12138 Points ∼89% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536
11653 Points ∼85% +21%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
10430 Points ∼76% +8%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
9670 Points ∼71%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
9527 Points ∼70% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
11318 Points ∼100% +14%
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
10916 Points ∼96% +10%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
9913 Points ∼88%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
9773 Points ∼86% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536
6522 Points ∼58% -34%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
6170 Points ∼55% -38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
11769 Points ∼100% +19%
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
11156 Points ∼95% +13%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
9858 Points ∼84%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
9717 Points ∼83% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536
7229 Points ∼61% -27%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
6786 Points ∼58% -31%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
19 fps ∼100% +12%
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
18 fps ∼95% +6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
17 fps ∼89% 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
17 fps ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536
12 fps ∼63% -29%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
12 fps ∼63% -29%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
28 fps ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536
20 fps ∼71% +11%
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
19 fps ∼68% +6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
18 fps ∼64% 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
18 fps ∼64%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
12 fps ∼43% -33%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
7.8 fps ∼100% +16%
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
7.2 fps ∼92% +7%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
6.7 fps ∼86%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
6.6 fps ∼85% -1%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
4.5 fps ∼58% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536
4.1 fps ∼53% -39%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
15 fps ∼100% +114%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536
8.4 fps ∼56% +20%
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
8.4 fps ∼56% +20%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
7 fps ∼47% 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
7 fps ∼47%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
4.5 fps ∼30% -36%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
4.8 fps ∼100% +14%
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
4.5 fps ∼94% +7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
4.2 fps ∼88% 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
4.2 fps ∼88%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
2.9 fps ∼60% -31%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
11 fps ∼100% +144%
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
4.9 fps ∼45% +9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
4.6 fps ∼42% +2%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
4.5 fps ∼41%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
2.9 fps ∼26% -36%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
5339 Points ∼100% +46%
BlackBerry DTEK50
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
5234 Points ∼98% +43%
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
4685 Points ∼88% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536
4051 Points ∼76% +11%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
3947 Points ∼74% +8%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
3663 Points ∼69%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
765 Points ∼100% +7550%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536
756 Points ∼99% +7460%
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
717 Points ∼94% +7070%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
10 Points ∼1% 0%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
10 Points ∼1% 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
10 Points ∼1%
BlackBerry DTEK50
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
9 Points ∼1% -10%
Graphics
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
827 Points ∼100%
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
818 Points ∼99% -1%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
805 Points ∼97% -3%
BlackBerry DTEK50
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
696 Points ∼84% -16%
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
669 Points ∼81% -19%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
430 Points ∼52% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536
415 Points ∼50% -50%
Memory
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
1346 Points ∼100% +28%
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
1076 Points ∼80% +2%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
1052 Points ∼78%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
790 Points ∼59% -25%
BlackBerry DTEK50
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
675 Points ∼50% -36%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
604 Points ∼45% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536
443 Points ∼33% -58%
System
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
2438 Points ∼100% +77%
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
2289 Points ∼94% +66%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536
1380 Points ∼57% 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
1379 Points ∼57%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
1359 Points ∼56% -1%
BlackBerry DTEK50
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
1310 Points ∼54% -5%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
1188 Points ∼49% -14%
Overall
Huawei P9 Lite
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 3072
1197 Points ∼100% +265%
Sony Xperia XA
Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 2048
1043 Points ∼87% +218%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7578, Mali-T720 MP2, 1536
662 Points ∼55% +102%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
328 Points ∼27%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 2048
283 Points ∼24% -14%
BlackBerry DTEK50
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
276 Points ∼23% -16%
ZTE Blade V7
MT6753, Mali-T720 MP4, 2048
249 Points ∼21% -24%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
2092 Points ∼100%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
617 MSM8952, Adreno 405, 3072
698 Points ∼100%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
ZTE Blade V7
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
13761.1 ms * ∼100% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11796.2 ms * ∼86% -6%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11109.2 ms * ∼81%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11102 ms * ∼81% -0%
BlackBerry DTEK50
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
10420.1 ms * ∼76% +6%
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9609.8 ms * ∼70% +13%
Huawei P9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9396.5 ms * ∼68% +15%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4756 Points ∼100% +41%
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4046 Points ∼85% +20%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3656 Points ∼77% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3566 Points ∼75% +6%
BlackBerry DTEK50
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3527 Points ∼74% +5%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3371 Points ∼71%
ZTE Blade V7
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2689 Points ∼57% -20%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
72 Points ∼100% +33%
Huawei P9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
67 Points ∼93% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash
64 Points ∼89% +19%
BlackBerry DTEK50
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
64 Points ∼89% +19%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
61 Points ∼85% +13%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54 Points ∼75%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei P9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
29.03 Points ∼100% +26%
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
27.5 Points ∼95% +20%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash
23 Points ∼79%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22.8 Points ∼79% -1%
BlackBerry DTEK50
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22.691 Points ∼78% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22.1 Points ∼76% -4%
ZTE Blade V7
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
18.19 Points ∼63% -21%

* ... smaller is better

ZTE Axon 7 Mini
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash
BlackBerry DTEK50
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei P9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash
ZTE Blade V7
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
90%
32%
13%
1%
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
50.27
48.87
-3%
46.92
-7%
25.1
-50%
50.68
1%
20.89
-58%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73.89
74.14
0%
74.4
1%
60.81
-18%
72.87
-1%
43.67
-41%
Random Write 4KB
6.7
8.12
21%
35.79
434%
15.35
129%
10.6
58%
10.27
53%
7.58
13%
Random Read 4KB
14.05
15.76
12%
36.32
159%
38.22
172%
22.05
57%
21.92
56%
28.07
100%
Sequential Write 256KB
122.84
72.79
-41%
43.48
-65%
46.24
-62%
68.64
-44%
27.27
-78%
39.45
-68%
Sequential Read 256KB
230.82
226.55
-2%
271.38
18%
283.55
23%
240.43
4%
168.79
-27%
196.76
-15%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high20 fps
 very low28 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high35 fps
Carga Máxima
 39 °C38.4 °C33.9 °C 
 38.4 °C39.3 °C33.2 °C 
 36.7 °C37.6 °C33 °C 
Máximo: 39.3 °C
Médio: 36.6 °C
32.9 °C33.3 °C34.2 °C
32.9 °C33.9 °C34.8 °C
31.5 °C34.2 °C34 °C
Máximo: 34.8 °C
Médio: 33.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  27.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.642.32525.430.43125.332.54032.934.75033.642.36331.636.98028.431.21002731.412520.839.21602244.320021.350.525020.853.831521.260.140019.464.350019.570.963017.774.180017.975.8100017.878.7125017.377.5160017.477.3200016.777.8250017.276.6315018.278.2400017.976.8500017.675.1630017.772800017.861.51000017.967.81250018.167.81600018.259.7SPL3088N1.373.2median 17.9ZTE Axon 7 Minimedian 70.9Delta1.310.62832.42833.331.333.332.531.732.534.92634.947.639.447.633.736.233.730.728.630.727.925.427.930.421.330.433.223.333.235.122.535.141.822.441.845.421.345.45018.45055.817.555.860.517.560.56717.26767.416.867.468.117.368.164.817.464.858.716.658.76417.36471.517.671.57417.67474.517.774.573.917.473.97117.77169.417.969.458.318.158.348.918.148.98229.88248.51.348.5median 60.5Sony Xperia XAmedian 17.7median 60.511.61.611.632.440.831.336.431.733.12635.639.438.836.23628.626.225.424.421.332.623.340.422.550.722.456.221.36118.46317.569.317.570.317.265.516.872.217.375.617.474.716.675.517.376.917.676.417.675.917.775.417.470.317.762.117.955.518.161.918.167.929.8861.363.3median 17.7BlackBerry DTEK50median 67.91.69.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
ZTE Axon 7 Mini audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.97 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia XA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.02 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

BlackBerry DTEK50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.06 / 0.13 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.68 / 0.96 / 1.06 Watt
Carga midlight 3.22 / 6.75 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
2705 mAh
BlackBerry DTEK50
2610 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
3000 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
2300 mAh
ZTE Blade V7
2540 mAh
Power Consumption
-43%
-45%
-46%
-21%
-11%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
0.68
0.78
-15%
0.63
7%
0.73
-7%
0.72
-6%
0.96
-41%
0.73
-7%
Idle Average *
0.96
1.72
-79%
1.91
-99%
2.09
-118%
1.5
-56%
1.39
-45%
0.92
4%
Idle Maximum *
1.06
1.77
-67%
1.96
-85%
2.11
-99%
1.57
-48%
1.45
-37%
0.93
12%
Load Average *
3.22
4.33
-34%
3.88
-20%
4.15
-29%
3.48
-8%
2.65
18%
4.47
-39%
Load Maximum *
6.75
8.21
-22%
8.74
-29%
5.05
25%
6.04
11%
3.51
48%
5.96
12%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
21h 27min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
6h 39min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 15min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 16min
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
2705 mAh
BlackBerry DTEK50
2610 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
3000 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
2300 mAh
ZTE Blade V7
2540 mAh
Battery Runtime
3%
40%
33%
-15%
75%
30%
Reader / Idle
1287
1020
-21%
1226
-5%
1404
9%
775
-40%
1978
54%
H.264
435
472
9%
775
78%
568
31%
460
6%
863
98%
WiFi v1.3
399
404
1%
735
84%
604
51%
353
-12%
628
57%
519
30%
Load
196
244
24%
201
3%
272
39%
170
-13%
376
92%

Pro

+ Chassi de alta qualidade
+ Bons alto falantes
+ Sem afogamentos
+ Expansão de dual-SIM/memória via microSD
+ Boa tela AMOLED
+ Carga rápida
+ Capa protetora incluída
+ Três anos de garantia
+ USB-C...

Contra

- ...mas velocidade 2.0 apenas
- Durações médias da bateria
- O micro-SD não pode ser formatado como armazenamento interno
- Problemas com a conexão à Internet móvel em condições difíceis de recepção
- Módulo WLAN lento sem CA
In review: ZTE Axon 7 Mini. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.
In review: ZTE Axon 7 Mini. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

A ZTE foi capaz de transportar muitos aspectos positivos de seu smartphone carro-chefe Axon 7 para o Axon 7 Mini menor. Isto inclui o ótimo chassi e os bons alto falantes, mas o painel FHD-AMOLED também é convincente, exceto pelas corres não muito precisas. O software também deixa uma boa impressão e a operação é muito fluente na prática. A ZTE também é muito generosa em termos de acessórios e garantia.   

As desvantagens definitivamente incluem o ultrapassado módulo Wi-Fi, bem como os problemas com a conexão à internet móvel. Em situações difíceis, ainda podemos fazer chamadas, mas não podemos utilizar a Internet. Também não sabemos por que os cartões microSD não podem ser formatados como armazenamento interno, apesar do leitor de cartões rápido. Nós também vemos espaço para melhoria em termos de duração de bateria, porque alguns dos rivais simplesmente duram muito mais tempo.

O ZTE Axon 7 Mini é um bom smartphone e não tem nada que esconder de seu irmão maior Axon 7 em algumas áreas. No entanto, a ZTE economizou um pouco de dinheiro em outros aspectos, e, a as vezes ruim conexão à internet móvel, em particular, afeta um pouco à impressão geral. 

Já mencionamos que o ZTE Axon 7 Mini compete com muitos smartphones bons na faixa de preços de até 300 Euros (~$316). Nossos aparelhos de comparação são bastante similares em termos de desempenho, e as diferenças normalmente se limitam aos recursos. Graças ao seu ótimo chassi, bons alto falantes e equipamento generoso de memória, o modelo de teste oferece algumas vantagens. Se você puder viver com a, ás vezes, deficiente conexão à internet móvel, o ZTE Axon 7 Mini não é uma má escolha.

ZTE Axon 7 Mini - 11/22/2016 v5.1
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento
90%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
44 / 60 → 73%
Peso
92%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
81%
Desempenho do jogos
25 / 63 → 39%
Desempenho da aplicação
33 / 70 → 48%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Camera
71%
Médio
73%
84%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone ZTE Axon 7 Mini
Andreas Osthoff, 2016-11-26 (Update: 2016-12-15)