Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 6X

Bom e acessível. Embora o Honor 6X não custe muito, é um sério concorrente para os smartphones consideravelmente mais caros, em termos de configuração e desempenho. Inclusive está equipado com uma dual-câmera. Nossa análise revela como o telefone Android como se sai o subsidiário Huawei em nossos testes.
Honor 6X (6 Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 655 8 x 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memória
3 GB 
, LPDDR3
Pantalha
5.50 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, abgerundetes 2,5D-Glas, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22.9 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões micro-SD máx. 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor Hall, sensor de proximidade, bússola, sensor de gravidade, micro-USB 2.0, USB OTG, WiFi Direct, GLONASS, BeiDou
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM quad-band (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS tri-banda (900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat.6 (800, 900, 1800, 2100, 2600 MHz), downloads/uploads max. 300/50 MBit/s, nano-SIM, head SAR 1.23 W/kg, body SAR 1.16 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.2 x 150.9 x 76.2
Bateria
3340 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix LED flash, detecção facial autofoco, vídeos máx. 1920x1080 pixels at 30 FPS, lentes: Sony IMX386
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix vídeos máx. 1280x720 pixels at 30 FPS
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Cabo USB, fonte de alimentação modular, guia de início rápido, EMUI 4.1, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
162 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g
Preço
249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

151.3 mm 76.3 mm 8.2 mm 158 g151.7 mm 76 mm 7.8 mm 169 g150.9 mm 76.2 mm 8.2 mm 162 g147.2 mm 72.9 mm 7.6 mm 147 g146.5 mm 71.5 mm 8 mm 150 g143.6 mm 66.8 mm 7.9 mm 137 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HTC One A9s
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s +88%
Honor 6X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash
57.9 MBit/s
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.1 MBit/s -26%
iperf3 receive AX12
HTC One A9s
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s +87%
Honor 6X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.6 MBit/s
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.9 MBit/s -21%
Honor 6x: Total route
Honor 6x: Total route
Honor 6x: Turning point
Honor 6x: Turning point
Honor 6x: Bridge
Honor 6x: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Total route
Garmin Edge 500: Total route
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
551
cd/m²
547
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
556
cd/m²
547
cd/m²
545
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
520
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
abgerundetes 2,5D-Glas tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 556 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 540.1 cd/m² Minimum: 7.34 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 547 cd/m²
Contraste: 960:1 (Preto: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.09
Honor 6X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Honor 5X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Huawei P8 lite 2017
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
HTC One A9s
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.50
Sony Xperia XA
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Screen
8%
8%
16%
0%
-15%
Brightness middle
547
535
-2%
575
5%
348
-36%
287
-48%
518
-5%
Brightness
540
521
-4%
559
4%
320
-41%
289
-46%
475
-12%
Brightness Distribution
94
85
-10%
91
-3%
85
-10%
91
-3%
81
-14%
Black Level *
0.57
0.43
25%
0.39
32%
0.23
60%
0.61
-7%
Contrast
960
1244
30%
1474
54%
1513
58%
849
-12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.1
4.88
4%
5.2
-2%
3.5
31%
2.9
43%
6.8
-33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.1
8.66
5%
10.3
-13%
6.4
30%
10.1
-11%
11.4
-25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.2
5.2
16%
7.2
-16%
4
35%
2.1
66%
7
-13%
Gamma
2.09 105%
2.26 97%
2.4 92%
2.3 96%
2.05 107%
2.35 94%
CCT
6546 99%
7766 84%
7224 90%
6527 100%
6228 104%
8151 80%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 6X
56764 Points
Honor 5X
37152 Points -35%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
56798 Points 0%
HTC One A9s
51330 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
45234 Points -20%
Sony Xperia XA
48331 Points -15%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 6X
788 Points
Huawei P8 lite 2017
780 Points -1%
HTC One A9s
711 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
680 Points -14%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 6X
3341 Points
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3240 Points -3%
HTC One A9s
2936 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3277 Points -2%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 6X
11775 Points
Honor 6X
11775 Points 0%
Honor 5X
7852 Points -33%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
11611 Points -1%
HTC One A9s
10766 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
8505 Points -28%
Sony Xperia XA
11156 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 6X
11353 Points
Honor 6X
11353 Points 0%
Honor 5X
7764 Points -32%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
11147 Points -2%
HTC One A9s
10453 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
7746 Points -32%
Sony Xperia XA
10916 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 6X
13535 Points
Honor 6X
13535 Points 0%
Honor 5X
8174 Points -40%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
13590 Points 0%
HTC One A9s
12025 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
12949 Points -4%
Sony Xperia XA
12138 Points -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 6X
550 Points
Honor 5X
129 Points -77%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
606 Points +10%
HTC One A9s
603 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
475 Points -14%
Sony Xperia XA
603 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 6X
468 Points
Honor 5X
103 Points -78%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
516 Points +10%
HTC One A9s
524 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
394 Points -16%
Sony Xperia XA
525 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 6X
1433 Points
Honor 5X
1089 Points -24%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1547 Points +8%
HTC One A9s
1269 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
1687 Points +18%
Sony Xperia XA
1259 Points -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 6X
385 Points
Huawei P8 lite 2017
389 Points +1%
HTC One A9s
425 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
299 Points -22%
Sony Xperia XA
422 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 6X
318 Points
Huawei P8 lite 2017
321 Points +1%
HTC One A9s
359 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
242 Points -24%
Sony Xperia XA
306 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 6X
1440 Points
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1532 Points +6%
HTC One A9s
1175 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
1681 Points +17%
Sony Xperia XA
1236 Points -14%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6X
19 fps
Honor 5X
14 fps -26%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
19 fps 0%
HTC One A9s
27 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
19 fps 0%
Sony Xperia XA
28 fps +47%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6X
18 fps
Honor 5X
14 fps -22%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
18 fps 0%
HTC One A9s
18 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
12 fps -33%
Sony Xperia XA
18 fps 0%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 6X
8.5 fps
Honor 5X
5.9 fps -31%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
8.5 fps 0%
HTC One A9s
14 fps +65%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
9.4 fps +11%
Sony Xperia XA
15 fps +76%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6X
4.6 fps
Honor 5X
5.4 fps +17%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
7.9 fps +72%
HTC One A9s
7.2 fps +57%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
4.9 fps +7%
Sony Xperia XA
7.2 fps +57%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6X
4.9 fps
Huawei P8 lite 2017
5 fps +2%
HTC One A9s
11 fps +124%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
7.2 fps +47%
Sony Xperia XA
11 fps +124%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 6X
2.5 fps
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4.6 fps +84%
HTC One A9s
2.6 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3.2 fps +28%
Sony Xperia XA
4.8 fps +92%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 6X
4383 Points
Honor 5X
3794 Points -13%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4419 Points +1%
HTC One A9s
3350 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3691 Points -16%
Sony Xperia XA
4685 Points +7%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 6X
1300 Points
Honor 5X
297 Points -77%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
435 Points -67%
HTC One A9s
Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
973 Points -25%
Sony Xperia XA
1043 Points -20%
System (sort by value)
Honor 6X
2721 Points
Honor 5X
1378 Points -49%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
2694 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
2127 Points -22%
Sony Xperia XA
2289 Points -16%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 6X
1779 Points
Honor 5X
787 Points -56%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1658 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
1319 Points -26%
Sony Xperia XA
1076 Points -40%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 6X
819 Points
Honor 5X
763 Points -7%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
826 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
512 Points -37%
Sony Xperia XA
669 Points -18%
Web (sort by value)
Honor 6X
720 Points
Honor 5X
9 Points -99%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
10 Points -99%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
624 Points -13%
Sony Xperia XA
717 Points 0%

Legend

 
Honor 6X HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P8 lite 2017 HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC One A9s Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 6X
4199 Points
Honor 5X
3595 Points -14%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4630 Points +10%
HTC One A9s
4395 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3905 Points -7%
Sony Xperia XA
4046 Points -4%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Honor 6X
9373 ms *
Honor 5X
12510 ms * -33%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
8768 ms * +6%
HTC One A9s
9346 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
9671 ms * -3%
Sony Xperia XA
9610 ms * -3%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Honor 6X
73 Points
Honor 5X
65 Points -11%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
62 Points -15%
HTC One A9s
69 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
66 Points -10%
Sony Xperia XA
72 Points -1%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 6X
26.46 Points
Honor 5X
21.92 Points -17%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
29.5 Points +11%
HTC One A9s
27.48 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
24.12 Points -9%
Sony Xperia XA
27.5 Points +4%

* ... smaller is better

Honor 6X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 5X
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash
HTC One A9s
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia XA
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
-45%
-29%
-25%
-13%
-9%
Sequential Read 256KB
283.4
144
-49%
165.8
-41%
210.2
-26%
189.4
-33%
240.4
-15%
Sequential Write 256KB
73.8
78
6%
42
-43%
68.6
-7%
46.24
-37%
68.6
-7%
Random Read 4KB
39.55
17
-57%
38.7
-2%
21.3
-46%
22.33
-44%
22.05
-44%
Random Write 4KB
45.05
10
-78%
8
-82%
34.6
-23%
10.11
-78%
10.6
-76%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
52
53.1
2%
39.6
-24%
75.5
45%
72.9
40%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
34.53
32.1
-7%
25.6
-26%
58.2
69%
50.7
47%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high25 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high57 fps
Carga Máxima
 35.9 °C34.8 °C37.1 °C 
 35.2 °C35.1 °C37.5 °C 
 34.1 °C33.7 °C36 °C 
Máximo: 37.5 °C
Médio: 35.5 °C
31.7 °C32.2 °C32.5 °C
31.7 °C31.7 °C32.4 °C
32.1 °C31.5 °C32 °C
Máximo: 32.5 °C
Médio: 32 °C
Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.642.62525.437.53125.334.64032.931.35033.630.96331.632.48028.429.71002728.412520.829.21602231.720021.336.925020.84631521.252.340019.455.850019.559.163017.760.880017.966.6100017.871.5125017.375160017.472.3200016.772.7250017.271.6315018.270.7400017.967.6500017.666.6630017.761.6800017.856.51000017.957.11250018.156.91600018.242.2SPL3081.9N1.346.3median 17.9median 59.1Delta1.41134.139.435.734.134.432.132.434.432.729.727.532.728.635.927.528.631.937.935.431.934.131.429.734.129.326.529.229.325.525.825.325.527.925.724.127.935.628.62335.640.535.223.140.548.943.418.548.953.945.720.553.95748.518.75760.150.218.160.159.750.918.259.75750.319.15764.457.11764.471.362.717.371.374.765.917.474.775.767.517.575.776.267.217.376.279.169.617.279.181.171.917.281.180.170.617.280.176.567.317.676.574.665.117.774.66757.917.86757.547.11857.541.931.417.941.988.279.129.988.265.638.11.365.6median 64.4median 50.9median 17.9median 64.413.114.21.613.13629.93642.228.342.238.229.238.231.730.331.731.229.731.227.925.827.931.823.531.827.72427.731.125.131.126.121.826.132.221.732.237.324.737.34524.14551.521.851.557.922.457.963.219.863.26518.56565.318.465.367.11967.168.717.268.768.316.168.369.51669.570.916.470.97515.87577.214.677.272.514.672.572.914.772.974.514.974.569.414.769.455.514.755.583.629.883.653.11.353.1median 65.3median 18.4median 65.311.93.311.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 6XHonor 5XHuawei P8 lite 2017
Honor 6X audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor 5X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P8 lite 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.11 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.82 / 2 / 2.03 Watt
Carga midlight 3.34 / 4.92 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Honor 6X
3340 mAh
Honor 5X
3000 mAh
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3000 mAh
HTC One A9s
2300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Power Consumption
-21%
-38%
-27%
21%
7%
Idle Minimum *
0.82
0.87
-6%
1.44
-76%
1.29
-57%
0.67
18%
0.72
12%
Idle Average *
2
2.08
-4%
2.47
-24%
2.28
-14%
1.71
14%
1.5
25%
Idle Maximum *
2.03
2.22
-9%
2.58
-27%
2.52
-24%
1.83
10%
1.57
23%
Load Average *
3.34
5.26
-57%
4.55
-36%
4.06
-22%
2.37
29%
3.48
-4%
Load Maximum *
4.92
6.34
-29%
6.3
-28%
5.91
-20%
3.31
33%
6.04
-23%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
37h 30min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 45min
Carga (máximo brilho)
6h 15min
Honor 6X
3340 mAh
Honor 5X
3000 mAh
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3000 mAh
HTC One A9s
2300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2016
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-45%
-33%
-37%
29%
-58%
Reader / Idle
2250
1053
-53%
1326
-41%
1543
-31%
2030
-10%
775
-66%
H.264
885
602
-32%
644
-27%
587
-34%
1220
38%
460
-48%
WiFi v1.3
957
643
-33%
604
-37%
517
-46%
1025
7%
353
-63%
Load
375
144
-62%
283
-25%
245
-35%
681
82%
170
-55%

Pro

+ Acessível
+ Carcaça de alta qualidade
+ LTE Cat.6 e NFC
+ Dual-SIM
+ Sensor de digitais
+ Dual-camera com boa qualidade de imagem
+ Tela Full HD brilhante
+ Alto desempenho do sistema
+ Sem afogamentos sob uso intenso
+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Não suporta App2SD
- Sem WiFi de 5-GHz
- Dual-SIM híbrido apenas
- Os jogos nem sempre rodam fluentemente
- Alto falante mono medíocre
In review: Honor 6X. Review sample courtesy of Honor Germany.
In review: Honor 6X. Review sample courtesy of Honor Germany.

O Honor tem um pacote bem concebido em sua linha, com o 6X de 5,5 polegadas. Com um preço oficial de 249 Euros (~$268), o comprador recebe um smartphone de gama média veloz a com uma construção de alta qualidade que faz muitas coisas melhor que o seu predecessor 5X, e que convence com sua boa configuração.

O principal deles é definitivamente a câmera dupla com seu foco móvel - um recurso que normalmente é encontrado em smartphones consideravelmente mais caros. O painel Full HD, LTE Cat.6, NFC, suporte para dual SIM, e 32 GB de armazenamento, dos quais 22,9 GB podem ser utilizados, são outros pontos positivos. O Honor 6X pode ser durar dois dias facilmente, graças à potente bateria.

O Honor 6X combina seu baixo preço com uma configuração que é bastante digna da classe premium.

No entanto, o baixo preço também envolve fazer alguns compromissos: O Honor 6X somente transmite no Wi-Fi de 2,4 GHz alcança taxas de transmissão boas, mas não excepcionais. Além disso, os jogos atuais nem sempre rodam fluentemente quando os detalhes são ajustados no máximo, apesar de um SoC octa-core e 3 GB de RAM. O alto falante mono soa medíocre, por falar muito, e infelizmente, as chamadas também soam abafadas de vez em quando.

Não é realmente um ponto negativo, mas é um detalhe importante: O Honor 6X ainda utilizava Android 6.0 no momento do teste. No entanto, uma atualização para Android 7.0 foi anunciada e deve ser liberada durante as próximas semanas.

Honor 6X - 03/06/2017 v6(old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
83%
Teclado
72 / 75 → 95%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
42 / 60 → 70%
Peso
91%
Bateria
97%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
19 / 63 → 30%
Desempenho da aplicação
47 / 70 → 67%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 73%
Camera
73%
Médio
73%
83%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 6X
Manuel Masiero, 2017-03-22 (Update: 2017-03-27)