Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Apple iPad 6 2018

Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/02/2018

Agora com suporte para o Pencil. A Apple atualiza seu iPad e equipa o tablet com um novo chip (SoC), e o Apple Pencil agora também é suportado. Isso foi reservado para os modelos Pro até agora. Fora isso, não há muitos recursos novos, como você pode ver em nossa análise do iPad 2018.

Apple iPad 6 2018 (iPad Serie)
Processador
Apple A10 Fusion
Placa gráfica
Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
9.7 polegadas 4:3, 2048 x 1536 pixel 264 PPI, Multi-touch, native pen support, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB NVMe, 32 GB 
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: Fones, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Giroscópio de 3 eixos, acelerômetro, barômetro, Strom, USB e HDMI combinados na porta Lightning
Funcionamento em rede
Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.5 x 240 x 169.5
Bateria
32.4 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Apple iOS 11
Camera
Webcam: f2.4, 1080p Video, no OIS
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 1.2 MPix FaceTime f2.2 720p Video
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo no lado inferior, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
Released
03/29/2018
peso
469 g
Preço
349 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
915 MBit/s ∼100% +61%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
914 MBit/s ∼100% +60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
615 MBit/s ∼67% +8%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
570 MBit/s ∼62%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
530 MBit/s ∼58% -7%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
528 MBit/s ∼58% -7%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
465 MBit/s ∼51% -18%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼23% -62%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
569 MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
514 MBit/s ∼90% +3%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
500 MBit/s ∼88%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
497 MBit/s ∼87% -1%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
389 MBit/s ∼68% -22%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
374 MBit/s ∼66% -25%
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
354 MBit/s ∼62% -29%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s ∼42% -53%
Contrast and sharpness main camera
Contrast and sharpness main camera
Color accuracy main camera, reference colors in the lower half
Color accuracy main camera, reference colors in the lower half
Contrast and sharpness front camera
Contrast and sharpness front camera
Color accuracy front camera, reference colors in the lower half
Color accuracy front camera, reference colors in the lower half
534
cd/m²
538
cd/m²
510
cd/m²
498
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
498
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 538 cd/m² Médio: 513.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 530 cd/m²
Contraste: 869:1 (Preto: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
ColorChecker - Color Accuracy
The Delta E 2000 (ΔE) result is a metric for the difference of two colors, the measured one and the real color. The smaller the value, the better the result (Wikipedia). The average ΔE result of 1.2 for the is very good and visual color differences between the real color and the displayed are very small. In comparison, the device class Tablet scored results ranging from 0.4 (minimum) to 29.43 (maximum). The category average of 6.3 ΔE is 81 % worse than the tested display. The maximum ΔE value of 3.2 of all tested colors is in line (average of 11.3 ΔE).
Grayscale
The grayscale values should be evently distributed and without any color tint. The difference between the measured and intended gray level are again measured using the Delta E 2000 (ΔE) formula. The average ΔE result of 1 for the is outstanding and differences between the real gray level and the displayed are only perceivable by trained experts. In comparison, the device class Tablet scored grayscale results ranging from 0.64 (minumum) to 98 (maximum). The category average of 6.5 ΔE is 84.6 % worse than the tested display.
Black Level
The black level measures the brightness of the display when displaying a black color. Ideally the measured brightness in cd/m² is as low as possible (0 cd/m² would be ideal, as OLED displays can achieve). The measured black level of 0.61 cd/m² is good. In comparison, the device class Tablet scored grayscale results ranging from 0.01 (minimum) to 275 (maximum). The category average of 0.79 cd/m² is 22.8 % worse than the tested display.
min
Minimum Brightness
We measured the minimal brightness of a white area at very low 4.1 cd/m² and therefore well suited even for dark environments. In comparison, the device class Tablet scored grayscale results ranging from 0.01 (minimum) to 204 (maximum). The category average of 13.3 cd/m² is 69.2 % worse than the tested display.
Gamma
The ideal Gamma value is 2.2 in Windows and OS X. The higher the distance to 2.2, the worse the image representation. We measured a gamma of 2.28 and therefore a distance of 0.08 to the ideal. In comparison, the device class Tablet scored grayscale results ranging from 0.72 (minimum) to 5.51 (maximum). The category average of 2.36 cd/m² is 3.39 % worse.
Apple iPad 6 2018
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7
Apple iPad (2017)
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Super AMOLED, 2048x1526, 9.7
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8
Screen
-10%
-13%
20%
-22%
-48%
Brightness middle
530
514
-3%
634
20%
650
23%
452
-15%
382
-28%
Brightness
513
485
-5%
625
22%
614
20%
468
-9%
378
-26%
Brightness Distribution
92
88
-4%
87
-5%
90
-2%
82
-11%
92
0%
Black Level *
0.61
0.46
25%
0.39
36%
0.42
31%
0.24
61%
Contrast
869
1117
29%
1626
87%
1548
78%
1592
83%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.2
1.4
-17%
1.9
-58%
1
17%
1.8
-50%
2.8
-133%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.2
2.9
9%
3.9
-22%
1.9
41%
4
-25%
6
-88%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1
2.1
-110%
2.8
-180%
1.5
-50%
1.2
-20%
3.5
-250%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.22 99%
2.26 97%
2.25 98%
2.11 104%
2.33 94%
CCT
6588 99%
6647 98%
7027 93%
6734 97%
6500 100%
6903 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.32
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.06

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8801 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.4 ms rise
↘ 11.5 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.7 ms rise
↘ 18.7 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
9358 Points ∼26% +57%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
9293 Points ∼26% +56%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
5952 Points ∼16%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (5922 - 5952, n=2)
5937 Points ∼16% 0%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
5922 Points ∼16% -1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5809 Points ∼16% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4187 Points ∼12% -30%
Average of class Tablet
  (1216 - 9358, n=30)
3961 Points ∼11% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3710 Points ∼10% -38%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
3933 Points ∼66% +12%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
3924 Points ∼66% +12%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
3527 Points ∼59% +1%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (3499 - 3527, n=2)
3513 Points ∼59% 0%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
3499 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1745 Points ∼29% -50%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1634 Points ∼28% -53%
Average of class Tablet
  (448 - 3933, n=30)
1424 Points ∼24% -59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
726 Points ∼12% -79%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
1628 Points ∼94%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (1531 - 1628, n=3)
1567 Points ∼91% -4%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
1531 Points ∼88% -6%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1213 Points ∼70% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1007 Points ∼58% -38%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
811 Points ∼47% -50%
Average of class Tablet
  (9 - 1628, n=93)
733 Points ∼42% -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
699 Points ∼40% -57%
Graphics
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
6896 Points ∼43% +2%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (6760 - 6896, n=3)
6844 Points ∼43% +1%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
6760 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4941 Points ∼31% -27%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
4569 Points ∼29% -32%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1602 Points ∼10% -76%
Average of class Tablet
  (98 - 8602, n=93)
1570 Points ∼10% -77%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
530 Points ∼3% -92%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2654 Points ∼55% +99%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1931 Points ∼40% +45%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1341 Points ∼28% +1%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
1334 Points ∼28%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (1257 - 1334, n=3)
1303 Points ∼27% -2%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
1257 Points ∼26% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1176 Points ∼25% -12%
Average of class Tablet
  (56 - 3985, n=93)
985 Points ∼21% -26%
System
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
6820 Points ∼56%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (6097 - 6820, n=3)
6500 Points ∼53% -5%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
6097 Points ∼50% -11%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
4680 Points ∼38% -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3505 Points ∼29% -49%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2838 Points ∼23% -58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2337 Points ∼19% -66%
Average of class Tablet
  (482 - 6820, n=93)
1977 Points ∼16% -71%
Overall
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
3163 Points ∼52%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (2999 - 3163, n=3)
3086 Points ∼51% -2%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
2999 Points ∼49% -5%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
2441 Points ∼40% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2409 Points ∼40% -24%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1769 Points ∼29% -44%
Average of class Tablet
  (167 - 3302, n=93)
1098 Points ∼18% -65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1005 Points ∼16% -68%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2419 Points ∼66% +68%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
2027 Points ∼55% +41%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
1988 Points ∼54% +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1798 Points ∼49% +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1721 Points ∼47% +20%
Average of class Tablet
  (793 - 2952, n=47)
1440 Points ∼39% 0%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
1439 Points ∼39%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
 
1439 Points ∼39% 0%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1098 Points ∼30% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
4695 Points ∼87% +28%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
4537 Points ∼84% +23%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
3682 Points ∼68%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
 
3682 Points ∼68% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2943 Points ∼55% -20%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
2519 Points ∼47% -32%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1504 Points ∼28% -59%
Average of class Tablet
  (102 - 5384, n=47)
1213 Points ∼23% -67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
239 Points ∼4% -94%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
3605 Points ∼76% +32%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
3558 Points ∼75% +30%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
2735 Points ∼58%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
 
2735 Points ∼58% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2578 Points ∼54% -6%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1957 Points ∼41% -28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1642 Points ∼35% -40%
Average of class Tablet
  (134 - 3806, n=52)
1059 Points ∼22% -61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
296 Points ∼6% -89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2445 Points ∼67% +59%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
1960 Points ∼54% +28%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
1960 Points ∼54% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1811 Points ∼50% +18%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
1535 Points ∼42%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (1522 - 1535, n=3)
1527 Points ∼42% -1%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
1525 Points ∼42% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1522 Points ∼42% -1%
Average of class Tablet
  (810 - 2952, n=50)
1370 Points ∼38% -11%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1074 Points ∼29% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
7434 Points ∼89% +22%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
7212 Points ∼87% +18%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
6095 Points ∼73%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (4057 - 6095, n=3)
4796 Points ∼58% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4626 Points ∼56% -24%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
4320 Points ∼52% -29%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
4057 Points ∼49% -33%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1719 Points ∼21% -72%
Average of class Tablet
  (42 - 7525, n=50)
1649 Points ∼20% -73%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
399 Points ∼5% -93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
4588 Points ∼72% +25%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
4521 Points ∼71% +23%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
3672 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3438 Points ∼54% -6%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (2964 - 3672, n=3)
3223 Points ∼51% -12%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
2964 Points ∼46% -19%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
2584 Points ∼41% -30%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1840 Points ∼29% -50%
Average of class Tablet
  (53 - 4588, n=54)
1297 Points ∼20% -65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
477 Points ∼7% -87%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
21886 Points ∼28% +41%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
19567 Points ∼25% +26%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
19534 Points ∼25% +26%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (15450 - 15626, n=3)
15525 Points ∼20% 0%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
15499 Points ∼20%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
15450 Points ∼20% 0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14698 Points ∼19% -5%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
13324 Points ∼17% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
12947 Points ∼16% -16%
Average of class Tablet
  (3675 - 27021, n=132)
12706 Points ∼16% -18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
110971 Points ∼24% +77%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
110148 Points ∼23% +76%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
63974 Points ∼14% +2%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (62626 - 63974, n=3)
63329 Points ∼13% +1%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
62626 Points ∼13%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
44645 Points ∼9% -29%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35210 Points ∼7% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
34002 Points ∼7% -46%
Average of class Tablet
  (2109 - 110971, n=132)
16699 Points ∼4% -73%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
7720 Points ∼2% -88%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
54449 Points ∼26% +46%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
54237 Points ∼26% +45%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
37676 Points ∼18% +1%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (37372 - 37746, n=3)
37598 Points ∼18% +1%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
37372 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
30277 Points ∼14% -19%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
29326 Points ∼14% -22%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26875 Points ∼13% -28%
Average of class Tablet
  (2411 - 54449, n=133)
14148 Points ∼7% -62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
8481 Points ∼4% -77%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
225 fps ∼13% +80%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
224 fps ∼13% +79%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
125 fps ∼7%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
118 fps ∼7% -6%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (92 - 125, n=4)
111 fps ∼6% -11%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
110.3 fps ∼6% -12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
96 fps ∼6% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
92 fps ∼5% -26%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
80.8 fps ∼5% -35%
Average of class Tablet
  (4.2 - 225, n=159)
24.7 fps ∼1% -80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps ∼1% -90%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
59.7 fps ∼13%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
59 fps ∼13% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
59 fps ∼13% -1%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
59 fps ∼13% -1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
59 fps ∼13% -1%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (57.7 - 59.7, n=4)
58.5 fps ∼13% -2%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
57.7 fps ∼13% -3%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
56 fps ∼12% -6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps ∼9% -33%
Average of class Tablet
  (3.7 - 59.7, n=163)
19.3 fps ∼4% -68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps ∼4% -68%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
110 fps ∼20% +76%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
109 fps ∼20% +74%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
62.6 fps ∼11%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
58.9 fps ∼11% -6%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
60.7 fps ∼11% -3%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (58.7 - 62.6, n=4)
60.2 fps ∼11% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
48 fps ∼9% -23%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
44 fps ∼8% -30%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
40.6 fps ∼7% -35%
Average of class Tablet
  (1.8 - 110, n=98)
16.3 fps ∼3% -74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
5.1 fps ∼1% -92%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
58.5 fps ∼16% +43%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
58 fps ∼16% +42%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (40.3 - 58.5, n=4)
48.7 fps ∼13% +19%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
46 fps ∼13% +12%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
40.9 fps ∼11%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
40.3 fps ∼11% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps ∼9% -17%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
28.7 fps ∼8% -30%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps ∼7% -36%
Average of class Tablet
  (2.9 - 58, n=101)
12.6 fps ∼3% -69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
9.2 fps ∼3% -78%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
76 fps ∼14% +78%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
63 fps ∼12% +48%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
42.7 fps ∼8%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
42.2 fps ∼8% -1%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (41.3 - 42.7, n=3)
42.1 fps ∼8% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
32 fps ∼6% -25%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
28.5 fps ∼5% -33%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
18 fps ∼3% -58%
Average of class Tablet
  (2 - 83, n=48)
15.6 fps ∼3% -63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps ∼1% -93%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
59.4 fps ∼34% +118%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
43 fps ∼24% +58%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (27.3 - 59.4, n=3)
42.7 fps ∼24% +56%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
27.3 fps ∼16%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
27 fps ∼15% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps ∼11% -30%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
18.5 fps ∼11% -32%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps ∼9% -45%
Average of class Tablet
  (4.3 - 54.3, n=48)
10.6 fps ∼6% -61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
6.7 fps ∼4% -75%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
26.8 fps ∼7%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
 
26.8 fps ∼7% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps ∼5% -29%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
18 fps ∼5% -33%
Average of class Tablet
  (2 - 26.8, n=27)
8.66 fps ∼2% -68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
2 fps ∼1% -93%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
17.9 fps ∼15%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
 
17.9 fps ∼15% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps ∼11% -27%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps ∼9% -44%
Average of class Tablet
  (2 - 17.9, n=27)
5.97 fps ∼5% -67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3.7 fps ∼3% -79%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
21420 Points ∼49%
Average of class Tablet
  (1400 - 38721, n=33)
11178 Points ∼25%
Medium Quality
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38353 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38353 Points ∼85%
Average of class Tablet
  (4017 - 42460, n=40)
18210 Points ∼40%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
1693 Points ∼65%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
1322 Points ∼51% -22%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
1059 Points ∼41% -37%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (1059 - 1693, n=4)
1313 Points ∼50% -22%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1061 Points ∼41% -37%
Average of class Tablet
  (426 - 1871, n=11)
823 Points ∼32% -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
615 Points ∼24% -64%
AnTuTu v7
MEM
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
12895 Points ∼74%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (12783 - 12895, n=2)
12839 Points ∼74% 0%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
12783 Points ∼73% -1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8364 Points ∼48% -35%
Average of class Tablet
  (4344 - 12895, n=11)
8295 Points ∼48% -36%
UX
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
54510 Points ∼82%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (51357 - 54510, n=2)
52934 Points ∼80% -3%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
51357 Points ∼77% -6%
Average of class Tablet
  (16170 - 54510, n=11)
33549 Points ∼50% -38%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
28103 Points ∼42% -48%
GPU
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
49141 Points ∼33%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (45772 - 49141, n=2)
47457 Points ∼32% -3%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
45772 Points ∼31% -7%
Average of class Tablet
  (9129 - 77533, n=11)
39860 Points ∼27% -19%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
33870 Points ∼23% -31%
CPU
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
54375 Points ∼45%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (50770 - 54375, n=2)
52573 Points ∼44% -3%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
50770 Points ∼42% -7%
Average of class Tablet
  (14989 - 68241, n=11)
48471 Points ∼40% -11%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
43350 Points ∼36% -20%
Total Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
170921 Points ∼49%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (160682 - 170921, n=2)
165802 Points ∼48% -3%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
160682 Points ∼46% -6%
Average of class Tablet
  (44992 - 201881, n=11)
130150 Points ∼37% -24%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113687 Points ∼33% -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash (IOS 11.1.2)
35255 Points ∼100% +26%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
35209 Points ∼100% +26%
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
34163 Points ∼97% +22%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND (Safari Mobile 10)
31188 Points ∼88% +12%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND (Safari Mobile 10)
30333 Points ∼86% +8%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe (Safari Mobile 11.3)
27967 Points ∼79%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (24875 - 27967, n=3)
26298 Points ∼75% -6%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Safari Mobile 10.0)
24875 Points ∼71% -11%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
18148 Points ∼51% -35%
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD (Safari iOS 9)
9962 Points ∼28% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Samsung Browser 5.2)
9531 Points ∼27% -66%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 65)
6802 Points ∼19% -76%
Average of class Tablet
  (1238 - 31188, n=149)
5858 Points ∼17% -79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4768 Points ∼14% -83%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 49)
4682 Points ∼13% -83%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
362 Points ∼100% +81%
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
359 Points ∼99% +80%
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Safari Mobile 11.0)
354 Points ∼98% +77%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND (Safari Mobile 10)
257 Points ∼71% +29%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND (Safari Mobile 10)
244 Points ∼67% +22%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
205 Points ∼57% +3%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Safari Mobile 10.0)
202 Points ∼56% +1%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (200 - 204, n=3)
202 Points ∼56% +1%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe (Safari Mobile 11.3)
200 Points ∼55%
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD (Safari iOS 9)
144 Points ∼40% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Samsung Browser 5.2)
132 Points ∼36% -34%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 65)
116 Points ∼32% -42%
Average of class Tablet
  (36 - 257, n=67)
102 Points ∼28% -49%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 49)
74 Points ∼20% -63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
67 Points ∼19% -66%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash (IOS 11.1.1)
224 Points ∼100% +34%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
223.5 Points ∼100% +34%
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
206.7 Points ∼92% +24%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND (Safari Mobile 10)
202.1 Points ∼90% +21%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND (Safari Mobile 10)
200.59 Points ∼90% +20%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe (Safari Mobile 11.3)
167.2 Points ∼75%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (166 - 168, n=3)
167 Points ∼75% 0%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Safari Mobile 10.0)
165.86 Points ∼74% -1%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
128.6 Points ∼57% -23%
Average of class Tablet
  (12 - 202, n=64)
50 Points ∼22% -70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Samsung Browser 5.2)
42.73 Points ∼19% -74%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 65)
36.127 Points ∼16% -78%
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 49)
28.27 Points ∼13% -83%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
26.099 Points ∼12% -84%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 49)
9903 ms * ∼100% -866%
Average of class Tablet
  (969 - 43092, n=160)
9394 ms * ∼95% -816%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
6785.6 ms * ∼69% -562%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 65)
5947 ms * ∼60% -480%
Apple iPad Mini 4
PowerVR GX6450, A8, 64 GB SSD (Safari iOS 9)
2557 ms * ∼26% -149%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2244.4 ms * ∼23% -119%
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
1457.7 ms * ∼15% -42%
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Safari Mobile 10.0)
1113.4 ms * ∼11% -9%
Average Apple A10 Fusion
  (1026 - 1113, n=3)
1081 ms * ∼11% -5%
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe (Safari Mobile 11.3)
1025.5 ms * ∼10%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND (Safari Mobile 10)
972.7 ms * ∼10% +5%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND (Safari Mobile 10)
968.8 ms * ∼10% +6%
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
730.8 ms * ∼7% +29%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
719.7 ms * ∼7% +30%
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash (IOS 11.1.2)
718 ms * ∼7% +30%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 34 °C32 °C30 °C 
 34 °C33 °C32 °C 
 36 °C38 °C35 °C 
Máximo: 38 °C
Médio: 33.8 °C
33 °C33 °C34 °C
33 °C36 °C35 °C
35 °C39 °C37 °C
Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 35 °C
alimentação elétrica  50 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini, TMD-50
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.7342530.830.33131.132.5403435.85032.432.16329.2308033.931.110028.338.312526.351.816026.148.620024.351.925022.955.1315225540022.363.350020.962.46302060.580019.363.2100018.959.9125018.562.3160017.962.2200017.862.8250017.669.3315017.864.7400017.761.7500017.659.3630017.666.2800017.861.31000017.856.71250017.759.21600017.862.1SPL30.875.7N1.537.2median 18.5Apple iPad 6 2018median 61.3Delta2.33.831.641.125.436.925.335.832.934.533.630.731.632.128.429.92742.520.850.12253.221.357.520.863.921.265.219.465.819.567.217.769.117.967.317.872.617.375.717.477.916.777.717.274.418.275.117.970.717.667.917.763.917.855.917.956.418.158.818.260.93084.61.359.1median 17.9Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017median 65.81.37.531.636.225.430.625.33132.931.533.634.231.634.628.437.42750.120.858.32261.321.367.520.868.521.267.819.465.519.565.217.767.317.967.517.865.217.372.617.467.516.768.117.268.718.272.517.970.617.66717.76117.858.217.96018.167.618.267.53081.21.351.3median 17.9Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017median 67.51.33.127.428.327.429.428.329.429.931.129.939.329.439.327.427.227.42625.72626.724.726.735.324.835.344.828.544.850.221.850.253.22253.252.222.452.256.422.756.460.323.360.365.924.465.966.219.666.265.51865.565.617.665.666.118.466.171.216.771.275.716.375.777.915.677.976.615.876.676.515.376.574.315.374.375.815.375.871.515.171.569.915.269.97515.27577.715.177.786.129.886.162.31.362.3median 66.2Apple iPad (2017)median 17.6median 66.2103.71039.432.336.737.632.439.433.729.835.128.731.333.730.631.425.928.431.730.631.829.739.639.12631.840.437.636.43739.440.433.335.529.331.536.233.328.436.131.129.228.628.428.826.833.430.225.428.831.125.63625.721.331.14133.546.841.623.3415447.857.148.822.55457.647.263.655.622.457.663.956.473.260.921.363.969.859.274.862.118.469.868.756.176.862.917.568.77058.379.665.817.57069.95478.462.517.269.965.248.576.358.216.865.266.949.175.956.917.366.977.456.978.76217.477.477.359.580.261.916.677.373.154.7806217.373.17555.780.862.717.67574.955.380.76317.674.97858.28263.617.77873.955.180.663.117.473.967.348.777.860.317.767.357.239.271.453.817.957.250.831.561.943.218.150.840.623.75233.918.140.68667.791.27429.88664.522.994.234.91.364.5median 67.3Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inchmedian 54median 76.3median 60.9median 17.7median 67.311.18.410.67.51.611.1hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPad 6 2018 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPad (2017) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.23 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.2 / 7.8 / 7.9 Watt
Carga midlight 12.6 / 12.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPad 6 2018
 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
8134 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
10875 mAh
Apple iPad (2017)
8.827 mAh
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2691 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
Apple iPad Mini 4
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4450 mAh
Apple iPhone 7
1960 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
6660 mAh
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
26%
10%
9%
61%
63%
70%
52%
40%
23%
61%
74%
41%
27%
Idle Minimum *
2.2
1.44
35%
1.55
30%
2.06
6%
0.72
67%
1.03
53%
0.54
75%
0.8
64%
2.08
5%
2.01
9%
0.89
60%
0.54
75%
1.6
27%
2.27 (0.4 - 13.6, n=297)
-3%
Idle Average *
7.8
6.12
22%
8.58
-10%
7.42
5%
2.45
69%
2.4
69%
1.63
79%
3.6
54%
3.5
55%
5.4
31%
3.13
60%
1.51
81%
4.13
47%
4.5 (0.5 - 33.3, n=298)
42%
Idle Maximum *
7.9
6.14
22%
8.59
-9%
7.47
5%
2.52
68%
2.6
67%
1.67
79%
3.9
51%
3.58
55%
5.44
31%
3.36
57%
1.54
81%
4.22
47%
4.96 (0.6 - 34.6, n=298)
37%
Load Average *
12.6
8.55
32%
10.09
20%
9.45
25%
3.84
70%
2.96
77%
2.74
78%
6.1
52%
6.97
45%
8.55
32%
3.93
69%
3.75
70%
6.57
48%
8.16 (1.5 - 72.4, n=282)
35%
Load Maximum *
12.8
10.62
17%
10.61
17%
12.31
4%
9.02
30%
6.6
48%
7.78
39%
8
37%
7.4
42%
11.53
10%
5.45
57%
5.01
61%
8.32
35%
9.59 (2 - 70.3, n=289)
25%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 54min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 05min
Apple iPad 6 2018
 mAh
Apple iPad (2017)
8.827 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
8134 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
10875 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4450 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
6660 mAh
Battery Runtime
15%
3%
21%
55%
70%
21%
Reader / Idle
1496
2036
2919
1903
1357
988
WiFi v1.3
714
764
7%
693
-3%
736
3%
760
6%
895
25%
698
-2%
Load
185
225
22%
199
8%
257
39%
375
103%
396
114%
266
44%
H.264
845
629
676
551
493
602

Pro

+ Suporte para Pencil
+ Preço mais baixo para escolas e estudantes
+ Excelente qualidade de construção e escolha de materiais
+ Boa tela

Contra

- Tela não laminada com lacuna significativa para o vidro (mas, em compensação, mais fácil de reparar)
- A câmera não melhorou por anos
- Sem SoC atual
In review: Apple iPad 2018
In review: Apple iPad 2018

O iPad 2018 (6ª geração) é a pequena atualização que a folha de especificações promete. O SoC mais rápido, mas ainda desatualizado e o suporte para o Apple Pencil são os novos recursos mais importantes. A duração da bateria e o consumo de energia sofreram devido a essas atualizações, mas ainda são bons, em geral.

O aquecimento não nos preocupa e a tela ainda é muito boa. O espaço entre o vidro frontal e o painel do visor não é perfeito, mas, em compensação, o dispositivo é mais fácil de reparar se tela for quebrada. No entanto, se o iPad pode rivalizar Chromebooks nas escolas é questionável. O preço com o Pencil e o teclado é muito maior. Isso significa que o software tem que fazer a diferença, e a Apple geralmente consegue ganhar pontos com aplicativos de alta qualidade.

O novo iPad é acessível? O novo iPad é cerca de $80 mais barato que o iPad Mini, e os modelos Pro custam $649 na loja online da Apple. Bons tablets Android com tela comparável já estão disponíveis por menos de $350.

Apple iPad 6 2018 - 04/10/2018 v6
Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner

Acabamento
89%
Teclado
74 / 80 → 92%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
37 / 65 → 56%
Peso
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
62 / 68 → 91%
Desempenho da aplicação
70 / 76 → 92%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
62 / 85 → 73%
Médio
78%
90%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Apple iPad 6 2018
Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner, 2018-04- 2 (Update: 2018-04- 7)