Corsair Voyager um laptop 1600 em revisão: Potência AMD total para gamers, streamers e criadores

Name: Corsair Voyager a1600
Brand: Corsair

Rembrandt e Navi unidos! A Corsair lançou um dispositivo muito interessante com o Voyager a1600, que se destaca da concorrência com atalhos especiais da Elgato. Com uma combinação de CPU AMD e GPU AMD, os gamers e streamers devem conseguir o valor de seu dinheiro. Colocamos o modelo superior em nosso curso de teste e analisaremos especificamente as características e o desempenho do notebook nesta análise.

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (traduzido por DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 12/14/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Ryzen (Zen) Radeon Gaming Laptop / Notebook

Corsair é um nome bem conhecido quando se trata de acessórios no setor de PCs: periféricos, fontes de alimentação, SSDs, estojos, monitores e também sistemas de mesa pré-construídos, alguns dos quais já testados, fazem parte da linha atual do fabricante. Com a série Voyager, a Corsair agora também entra no segmento de notebooks e quer participar do setor de jogos com a Voyager a1600. A posição inicial não é nada ruim, pois com a AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS e um dedicado AMD Radeon RX 6800M há uma base promissora. Você também pode contar com 32 GB de RAM DDR5 e um SSD com 2 TB de espaço de armazenamento na configuração superior. O painel de 240 Hz QHD, por outro lado, é sempre uma necessidade. No entanto, o preço de 3.550 euros está na liga superior.

Pode ser mais barato se você for com um AMD Ryzen 7 6800HScom 16 GB de RAM e um SSD de 1 TB. Aqui, atualmente são devidos 2.600 Euros. No teste, o Corsair Voyager a1600 compete com fortes rivais do campo dos atuais notebooks para jogos. Mais detalhes podem ser encontrados na tabela a seguir.

Test device courtesy of Corsair DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Corsair Voyager a1600

Processador

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS 8 x 3.3 - 4.9 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 35 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)

Placa gráfica

AMD Radeon RX 6800M - 12 GB VRAM, Análises do: 2525 MHz, Memoría: 2000 MHz, 135 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), Adrenalin 21.40.56.02, SmartShift

Memória

32 GB

, DDR5-4800

Pantalha

16.00 polegadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 188 PPI, BOE0A3B, IPS, 240 Hz

placa mãe

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Disco rígido

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB

, M.2-2280, NVMe, 1800 GB livre

Placa de Som

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Conexões

1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 3 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Headphone Combo Jack, AC-in, Card Reader: Full size SD card reader, UHS III, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Integrated CORSAIR SLIPSTREAM

Funcionamento em rede

Qualcomm WCN685x (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19.9 x 356 x 286.7

Bateria

99 Wh, 6410 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: Full-HD
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Dolby Atmos custom tuned internal speakers NVMe SSD, Teclado: CHERRY MX Ultra-Low Profile mechanical key switches with CAPELLIX LED RGB backlighting, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 230-Watt-Netzteil, Tasche, iCue, Elgato Stream Deck, Camera Hub, Dolby Access, VOYAGER Hub, CORSAIR Diagnostics, 12 Meses Garantia

peso

2.403 kg, Suprimento de energia: 451 g

Preço

3550 EUR

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.6 %	12/2022	Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	2.4 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89.5 %	08/2022	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	19.4 mm	16.10"	2560x1600
90.8 %	09/2022	Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	2.6 kg	19.4 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.2 %	06/2022	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
85.5 %	05/2022	HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	23 mm	16.10"	2560x1440
88.9 %	09/2022	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	20 mm	16.00"	2560x1600

Estojo e características - Fino mas robusto

A caixa do Corsair Voyager a1600 é feita de alumínio e, portanto, dá ao dispositivo uma estabilidade muito boa. Somente a tampa do visor torceu ligeiramente durante nossos testes de torção. Caso contrário, o caderno de jogos tem uma aparência relativamente modesta e não necessita de iluminação RGB, o que é muito bom. O display é segurado por duas pequenas dobradiças, o que não pode impedir completamente que salte.

Em termos de conectividade, o Corsair oferece interfaces modernas, embora o número seja muito manejável. É uma pena ter apenas uma USB Tipo A, mas existem três portas USB-C com suporte a Thunderbolt. Assim, o laptop está bem preparado para o futuro. O número de interfaces é provavelmente tão escasso devido ao recurso Slipstream, pois vários acessórios podem ser conectados diretamente ao notebook através desta tecnologia sem fio, sem um dongle adicional. O próprio Corsair oferece seus próprios ratos, teclados e fones de ouvido para isso. O módulo Wi-Fi vem da Foxconn e oferece o atual padrão Wi-Fi 6E.

O uso pretendido como um laptop de streaming requer uma boa webcam. O teste mostra que a câmera 1080p integrada tem melhor desempenho do que a concorrência. No entanto, recomendamos o uso de uma câmera externa para uso estacionário. Para o uso móvel, você pode voltar com confiança à câmera integrada.

Corsair Voyager a1600 - Almofada de resfriamento SSD

Comparação de tamanho

HP Omen 16-b1090ng Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Corsair Voyager a1600 Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W DIN A4 ❌

Esquerda: Kensington Lock, AC-in, 2x USB tipo C, conector combinado microfone/Headphone

Certo: USB Tipo A, Thunderbolt USB4, leitor de cartões SD (UHS-III)

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	158 MB/s +86%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)	98.4 MB/s +16%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	84.86 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	68 MB/s -20%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	60 MB/s -29%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	182.7 MB/s +103%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)	121.3 MB/s +35%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	89.78 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	72 MB/s -20%

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1723 (1681^min, 1688.83^P1 - 1736^max) MBit/s +94%
Average Qualcomm WCN685x (886 - 1782, n=19)	1641 MBit/s +85%
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1857, n=79, last 2 years)	1516 MBit/s +71%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 MediaTek RZ616	1260 (1156^min - 1343^max) MBit/s +42%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	886 (444^min - 941^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)	1664 (1649^min - 1680^max) MBit/s +95%
Average Qualcomm WCN685x (852 - 1777, n=18)	1579 MBit/s +85%
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)	1403 MBit/s +65%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng MediaTek MT7921	967 (489^min - 981^max) MBit/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	852 (425^min - 931^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	1875 (859^min - 1931^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1655 (1613^min, 1615.32^P1 - 1702^max) MBit/s -12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 MediaTek RZ616	1646 (1468^min - 1762^max) MBit/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1878, n=77, last 2 years)	1477 MBit/s -21%
Average Qualcomm WCN685x (623 - 1961, n=19)	1436 MBit/s -23%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	1780 (896^min - 1840^max) MBit/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)	1565 (988^min - 1682^max) MBit/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1793, n=153, last 2 years)	1272 MBit/s -29%
Average Qualcomm WCN685x (521 - 1838, n=18)	1269 MBit/s -29%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng MediaTek MT7921	976 (499^min - 1054^max) MBit/s -45%

Corsair Voyager a1600; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1846 (859-1931)

Corsair Voyager a1600; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø871 (444-941)

ColorChecker Corsair Voyager a1600: 16.78 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 24.62 ∆E

Dispositivos de entrada

Corsair dá à Voyager um teclado mecânico de 1600 baseado em interruptores Cherry MX. Estes são muito robustos e projetados para uma longevidade extrema. A viagem muito curta e o ponto de pressão claramente perceptível dão ao usuário um bom feedback tátil. Além disso, o curso não é umedecido, o que impede uma sensação de entrada esponjosa.

A iluminação do teclado pode ser configurada conforme desejado através do software iCUE. Diferentes efeitos e uma paleta de cores completa estão disponíveis para o usuário. Além disso, todas as teclas podem ser configuradas individualmente.

O touchpad mede 15,5 centímetros de largura e 10 centímetros de profundidade. Assim, o ClickPad é muito grande e é mais adequado na prática como um substituto do mouse. Se você achar a área de entrada ativa muito grande, você pode desativar o lado direito, fazendo duplo toque com o ponto branco no canto superior esquerdo. No entanto, não há indicação ótica ou táctil para esta característica. A superfície de vidro tem um acabamento acetinado sutil, que é confortável de operar mesmo com dedos um pouco suados. As duas teclas de entrada na área inferior funcionam bem e são bastante silenciosas quando pressionadas.

Display - Painel rápido 16:10

Sem sangramento de luz de fundo nas bordas

A tela do Corsair Voyager a1600 é um painel IPS de 16 polegadas com 240 Hz. O formato 16:10, que tem uma resolução de 2.560 x 1.600 pixels, proporciona uma generosa superfície de trabalho. Até o momento, não existem variantes alternativas de display para o Voyager a1600.

Em nossos testes, o painel instalado atinge uma boa luminosidade de 340 cd/m². No entanto, os contendores claramente oferecem visores mais brilhantes em comparação. Devido ao valor relativamente alto do preto, a relação de contraste sofre consideravelmente. Assim, o Voyager a1600 só atinge um contraste de 670:1 em nosso teste.

A fadiga ocular devido ao PWM não deve ser um problema com o Corsair Voyager a1600. O sangramento da luz de fundo não foi um problema com nosso dispositivo.


340 cd/m²	354 cd/m²	339 cd/m²
331 cd/m²	355 cd/m²	324 cd/m²
342 cd/m²	347 cd/m²	326 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

BOE0A3B tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 355 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 339.8 cd/m² Minimum: 17.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 328 cd/m²
Contraste: 670:1 (Preto: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.14
ΔE Greyscale 2.62 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
70.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Corsair Voyager a1600 BOE0A3B, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AUO B160QAN02.S, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 16.10	Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NE160QDM-NZ2, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00	HP Omen 16-b1090ng BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display		25%	-5%	22%	3%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	68.7	99.82 45%	63.7 -7%	97.3 42%	71 3%	69.3 1%
sRGB Coverage	98.2	99.99 2%	95.3 -3%	100 2%	97.9 0%	98.2 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.1	90.21 29%	65.7 -6%	84.9 21%	73.3 5%	70.8 1%
Response Times		3%	17%	15%	-3%	24%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	13 ?(7, 6)	11 ?(1, 10) 15%	9.2 ?(4.8, 4.4) 29%	13.8 ?(6.3, 7.5) -6%	14.5 ?(7.2, 7.3) -12%	12.6 ?(5.9, 6.7) 3%
Response Time Black / White *	10 ?(5, 5)	11 ?(1, 10) -10%	9.6 ?(4.8, 4.8) 4%	6.4 ?(1.8, 4.6) 36%	9.4 ?(4.4, 5) 6%	5.6 ?(1.5, 4.1) 44%
PWM Frequency		7400 ?(100)
Screen		71%	12%	29%	-30%	18%
Brightness middle	355	498 40%	478.8 35%	498 40%	335 -6%	547 54%
Brightness	340	502 48%	477 40%	468 38%	319 -6%	523 54%
Brightness Distribution	91	94 3%	90 -1%	80 -12%	90 -1%	88 -3%
Black Level *	0.53	0.11 79%	0.43 19%	0.36 32%	0.28 47%	0.44 17%
Contrast	670	4527 576%	1113 66%	1383 106%	1196 79%	1243 86%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.43	1.87 23%	2.24 8%	1.77 27%	4.38 -80%	2.1 14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.31	6.15 -43%	4.49 -4%	5.24 -22%	9.48 -120%	7 -62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.14	1.94 -70%	1.89 -66%	0.63 45%	1.33 -17%	0.9 21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.62	3.15 -20%	2.3 12%	2.4 8%	7 -167%	3.2 -22%
Gamma	2.28 ^96%	330.95 ^1%	2.25 ^98%	2.14 ^103%	2.103 ^105%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6909 ^94%	7294 ^89%	6955 ^93%	7046 ^92%	6244 ^104%	6979 ^93%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		33% / 51%	8% / 9%	22% / 26%	-10% / -19%	14% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

A qualidade de exibição é boa, e a cobertura do espaço de cores também é impressionante. No entanto, a concorrência freqüentemente oferece melhores preços também nesta comparação. Nossa amostra de revisão só pode bater a da Lenovo Legion 7 nesta disciplina. Devido aos bons valores Delta E-2000 da escala de cinza e cores em comparação com o espaço de cores sRGB, assumimos que a Corsair envia o dispositivo com um display calibrado. Uma calibragem manual melhora ligeiramente os valores do Delta E-2000 novamente. No entanto, o brilho máximo do display sofre. Recomendamos deixar o mostrador em seu estado de entrega. A cobertura do espaço de cores é suficiente para a edição semi-profissional de fotos e vídeos.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Em princípio, a superfície da tela mate é adequada para uso externo. Entretanto, o brilho comparativamente baixo da tela fala contra ela.

O Corsair Voyager a1600 sob céus nublados

O teste do ângulo de visão mostra o resultado de um painel IPS típico. Pequenas mudanças de cor são visíveis nas imagens dos quatro cantos, o que não leva a nenhuma restrição no uso normal.

Desempenho - Base Rembrandt com muita memória RAM e espaço de armazenamento

O Corsair Voyager a1600 com a combinação deAMD Ryzen 9 6900HSe o AMD Radeon RX 6800Moferece uma base muito boa para jogos atuais com o máximo de detalhes em um laptop. Em conexão com a memória de trabalho de 32 GB e um SSD de 2 TB, o usuário também obtém um desempenho decente aqui.

Condições de teste

Corsair oferece a possibilidade de usar o dispositivo em três modos diferentes, que podem ser comutados através do software iCUE. As opções são Silencioso, Equilibrado e Extremo. As diferenças estão no desempenho máximo disponível para a CPU e GPU, mesmo em combinação com a tecnologia Smart Shift. Todos os testes de desempenho foram realizados com o perfil Extreme.

Processador

OAMD Ryzen 9 6900HS é um processador de oito núcleos e se baseia na atual arquitetura Rembrandt. Os relógios SoC com uma freqüência de 3,3-4,9 GHz em Boost e suporta SMT, o que fornece ao usuário um total de 16 roscas. Em comparação direta com a concorrência baseada na Intel, o AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS tem dificuldades para se manter. No entanto, a amostra de teste domina um pouco melhor os testes AIDA64 e ocupa o terceiro lugar no ranking.

Para mais referências, nós o encaminhamos para nossoGráfico de comparação de CPU.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS: Ø2152 (2123.71-2170.49)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS; @Turbo Mode: Ø2279 (2140.75-2332.5)

Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2337 (2320.19-2354.74)

Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2490 (2422.04-2631.06)

HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2557 (2455.34-2812.94)

Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3279 (3244.91-3512.16)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	85.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	73.3 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	71.2 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	66.6 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	60.5 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	58 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	57.7 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	57.6 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	22449 Points +67%
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years)	19422 Points +44%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	16887 Points +26%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	16253 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14455 (14309.4^min - 14455.1^max) Points +8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	14403 Points +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	13445 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (12606 - 14403, n=5)	13439 Points 0%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	1935 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years)	1809 Points +16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	1799 Points +16%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	1743 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1564 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1554 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (1526 - 1570, n=5)	1553 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1526 Points -2%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	8522 Points +65%
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)	7383 Points +43%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	6352 Points +23%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	5892 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5616 Points +9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5552 Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (4829 - 5552, n=5)	5167 Points 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5152 Points

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	743 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)	697 Points +17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	695 Points +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	640 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	612 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (596 - 620, n=5)	608 Points +2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	599 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	596 Points

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	3512 (3244.91^min - 3512.16^max) Points +63%
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)	3074 Points +42%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	2813 (2455.34^min - 2812.94^max) Points +30%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	2631 (2422.04^min - 2631.06^max) Points +22%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2355 (2320.19^min - 2354.74^max) Points +9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	2333 (2140.75^min - 2332.5^max) Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (2054 - 2342, n=5)	2191 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	2161 Points

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	280 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)	268 Points +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	261 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	251 Points +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	245 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (218 - 254, n=5)	242 Points -1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	241 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	231 Points -6%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (220 - 277, n=5)	239 Seconds * -5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	227 Seconds *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	224 Seconds * +1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	215 Seconds * +5%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)	201 Seconds * +11%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	197.6 Seconds * +13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	182.7 Seconds * +20%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	149 Seconds * +34%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	86384 MIPS +39%
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)	76641 MIPS +24%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	72679 MIPS +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	64864 MIPS +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	62721 MIPS +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	62024 MIPS
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	62006 MIPS 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (52948 - 63591, n=5)	60092 MIPS -3%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	6358 MIPS +10%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)	6113 MIPS +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	5863 MIPS +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5805 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (5538 - 5958, n=5)	5766 MIPS -1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5680 MIPS -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5679 MIPS -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	5138 MIPS -11%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	16447 Points +64%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)	13504 Points +35%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	13500 Points +34%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	12463 Points +24%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	10040 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10018 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (8381 - 10040, n=5)	9358 Points -7%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	9224 Points -8%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	1874 Points +27%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	1810 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2193, n=231, last 2 years)	1805 Points +22%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	1746 Points +18%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1589 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (1480 - 1614, n=5)	1541 Points +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1537 Points +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1481 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	25.4 fps +51%
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)	21.1 fps +26%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	20 fps +19%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	18.5 fps +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	18.2 fps +8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	16.8 fps
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	16.2 fps -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (14.2 - 17.9, n=5)	16.2 fps -4%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	57.2 s *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	56.1 s * +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	54 s * +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (47.6 - 57.2, n=5)	51.3 s * +10%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)	49.3 s * +14%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	41.7 s * +27%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	41 s * +28%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	34.5 s * +40%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	0.5 sec * -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.4907 sec * -0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	0.4897 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (0.4672 - 0.502, n=5)	0.4874 sec * -0%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)	0.4706 sec * +4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4671 sec * +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4489 sec * +8%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	0.4209 sec * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6406

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

18728 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

73218 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

12340 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

17195

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

41849

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

21.59 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

174.61 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.92 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

25.29 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

178.03 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

2.52 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

245 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

202.73 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2161 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	91.3 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	90.6 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	88.4 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	86.3 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	82.8 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	81 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	67.4 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	60.9 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years)	18514 KRay/s +17%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	17242 KRay/s +9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	16064 KRay/s +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	15798 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (14212 - 16072, n=5)	15317 KRay/s -3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	11535 KRay/s -27%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9316 KRay/s -41%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	7636 KRay/s -52%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	106387 Points +6%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	102881 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	99931 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (90523 - 102881, n=5)	96872 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years)	93043 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	52916 Points -47%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	41656 Points -58%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	36195 Points -64%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years)	4297 MB/s +26%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	4216 MB/s +24%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	3657 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3614 MB/s +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	3410 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3378 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (3035 - 3614, n=5)	3326 MB/s -2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2673 MB/s -22%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years)	108858 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	105344 Points 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	105203 Points
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	104030 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (97461 - 105203, n=5)	102908 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101029 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99861 Points -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	98781 Points -6%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	13062 Points 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	13039 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	13011 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	12905 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (12548 - 13039, n=5)	12830 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years)	12143 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9927 Points -24%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9247 Points -29%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	58428 Points +7%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	56486 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	54778 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (49657 - 56486, n=5)	52606 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years)	47650 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	31779 Points -42%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	25547 Points -53%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	21106 Points -61%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	142686 MB/s +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	142360 MB/s +5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	135448 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	125268 MB/s -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (51791 - 142686, n=5)	118697 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years)	106724 MB/s -21%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	102111 MB/s -25%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	85401 MB/s -37%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1392 MB/s +61%
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years)	1202 MB/s +39%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1143 MB/s +32%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	948 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	905 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	888 MB/s +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	866 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (737 - 888, n=5)	818 MB/s -6%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years)	10025 KRay/s +19%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	9147 KRay/s +8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8981 KRay/s +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	8438 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (7530 - 8981, n=5)	8272 KRay/s -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	6663 KRay/s -21%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	5322 KRay/s -37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	4457 KRay/s -47%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	40868 MPixel/s +38%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40239 MPixel/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years)	36547 MPixel/s +23%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	36231 MPixel/s +22%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	30604 MPixel/s +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	29687 MPixel/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	29413 MPixel/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (25757 - 30291, n=5)	28445 MPixel/s -4%

Desempenho do sistema

Os resultados do benchmark mostram bom desempenho do sistema, embora uma clara diferença em relação aos notebooks baseados na Intel seja novamente perceptível. Subjetivamente, porém, o Corsair Voyager a1600 oferece um desempenho muito bom do sistema, sem latências perceptíveis no uso diário.

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	8636 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)	7573 Points +5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7539 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7377 Points +2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	7322 Points +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7208 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	7208 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6860 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11190 Points +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10715 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)	10708 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10521 Points +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10249 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9970 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	9970 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9758 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10932 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming (7244 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)	9727 Points +8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9632 Points +7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9613 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	9549 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9097 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8983 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	8983 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	14291 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)	11407 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11385 Points 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11350 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	11350 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11293 Points -1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10888 Points -4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9322 Points -18%

CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2132 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=167, last 2 years)	1876 Points +33%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1861 Points +32%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1661 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1596 Points +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1415 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	1415 Points 0%

CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2012 Points +46%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=167, last 2 years)	1787 Points +30%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1786 Points +30%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1609 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1551 Points +12%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1379 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	1379 Points 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2307 Points +44%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=167, last 2 years)	2040 Points +28%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1936 Points +21%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1795 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1754 Points +10%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1599 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	1599 Points 0%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2007 Points +89%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1868 Points +76%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=167, last 2 years)	1700 Points +60%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1449 Points +37%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1310 Points +24%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1060 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	1060 Points 0%

PCMark 10 Score		7208 pontos
Ajuda

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	63993 MB/s +28%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63110 MB/s +26%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60342 MB/s +21%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years)	59056 MB/s +18%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	50837 MB/s +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (49150 - 51517, n=5)	50427 MB/s +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	49972 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	49150 MB/s -2%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	69716 MB/s +36%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	67695 MB/s +32%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66496 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years)	62916 MB/s +23%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	51836 MB/s +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	51270 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	51041 MB/s 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (43646 - 51838, n=5)	49919 MB/s -3%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	64272 MB/s +16%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	63527 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years)	61374 MB/s +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	55214 MB/s 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	55214 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	55102 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	51577 MB/s -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (15975 - 55235, n=5)	46524 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	120.6 ns * -27%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	95.2 ns *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.2 ns * +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (79.2 - 110.9, n=5)	93.1 ns * +2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	90.1 ns * +5%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years)	87.2 ns * +8%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	86 ns * +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	85.4 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Latências DPC

As latências documentadas não são aumentadas ao abrir múltiplas abas do navegador em Edge. O Voyager a1600 também domina sem problemas a reprodução do vídeo do YouTube 4K sem problemas. Só vemos um ligeiro aumento das latências após iniciar Prime95.

Máxima latência ao abrir várias abas do navegador e reproduzir um vídeo de 4K.

Motoristas classificados por maior tempo de execução

Latência máxima após dez segundos de Prime95

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2127.9 μs * -175%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1393.9 μs * -80%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1194.1 μs * -54%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1155.7 μs * -50%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	773 μs *
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	717.4 μs * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Armazenamento em massa

Com um SSD de 2 TB, o Corsair Voyager a1600 oferece um grande espaço de armazenamento, que é definitivamente necessário devido ao seu uso pretendido. O modelo instalado não consegue acompanhar a concorrência nos benchmarks. No entanto, as taxas de transferência são mais do que suficientes para a maioria dos usuários. No teste de carga, o desempenho do SSD está consistentemente disponível sem restrições. A propósito, a placa base do notebook serve para dissipar o calor. Um total de dois dispositivos de armazenamento de massa no formato M.2-2280 pode ser instalado.

Para mais comparações e benchmarks, consulte nosso SSD/HDD tabela comparativa.

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

Sequential Read: 3524 MB/s

Sequential Write: 2050 MB/s

512K Read: 1754 MB/s

512K Write: 2055 MB/s

4K Read: 39.29 MB/s

4K Write: 137.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 443.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 493.5 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	91.4 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	89.2 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX ^-1! Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	87.7 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	86.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	79.6 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	77.5 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	70.5 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	64.5 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4343 MB/s +35%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4195 (4171.24^min - 4194.51^max) MB/s +31%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	3928 (3889.8^min - 3927.66^max) MB/s +22%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2376 - 5676, n=29)	3919 MB/s +22%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3625 (3612.57^min - 3624.81^max) MB/s +13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3595 (3264.19^min - 3594.73^max) MB/s +12%
Average of class Gaming (1291 - 7045, n=196, last 2 years)	3528 MB/s +10%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3207 (3148.45^min - 3206.84^max) MB/s
seq write
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4954 (4429.55^min - 4954.26^max) MB/s +47%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4780 (3934.47^min - 4779.5^max) MB/s +42%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4599 (4248.83^min - 4598.67^max) MB/s +36%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2461 - 7628, n=29)	4204 MB/s +24%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	4033 (3953.13^min - 4032.82^max) MB/s +19%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=196, last 2 years)	3808 MB/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3377 (3301.76^min - 3376.79^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3274 (3228.15^min - 3273.86^max) MB/s -3%
seq q8 t1 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3471 - 12556, n=29)	7139 MB/s +17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	6867 (6210.3^min - 6866.91^max) MB/s +13%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6697 (4182.58^min - 6697.46^max) MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6694 (5547.2^min - 6693.9^max) MB/s +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6693 (6460.49^min - 6692.89^max) MB/s +10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6499 (5666.71^min - 6499.29^max) MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming (1983 - 16089, n=196, last 2 years)	6357 MB/s +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6099 (5570.64^min - 6098.73^max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3537 - 10261, n=29)	5515 MB/s +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5412 (5265.32^min - 5411.99^max) MB/s +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5048 (5040.92^min - 5048.44^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5003 (4959.7^min - 5002.55^max) MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4985 (4772.28^min - 4984.61^max) MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4982 (4649.6^min - 4981.68^max) MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=196, last 2 years)	4779 MB/s -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4765 (4460.74^min - 4765.06^max) MB/s -6%
4k q1 t1 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (56.2 - 91.2, n=29)	78.5 MB/s +34%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	77.1 (76.91^min - 77.11^max) MB/s +32%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	74.1 (72.94^min - 74.14^max) MB/s +26%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	70.3 (69.8^min - 70.31^max) MB/s +20%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	67.6 (66.3^min - 67.64^max) MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=196, last 2 years)	67.6 MB/s +15%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	66.7 (66.39^min - 66.66^max) MB/s +14%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	58.6 (57.33^min - 58.61^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	258 (233.29^min - 257.8^max) MB/s +83%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=196, last 2 years)	224 MB/s +59%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	222 (217.59^min - 222.42^max) MB/s +58%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (134 - 295, n=29)	219 MB/s +56%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	205 (195.73^min - 204.56^max) MB/s +46%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	161 (159.24^min - 160.98^max) MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	159.1 (155.4^min - 159.1^max) MB/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	140.8 (138.42^min - 140.84^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (663 - 4075, n=29)	2978 MB/s +112%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2859 (2841.54^min - 2858.59^max) MB/s +104%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2842 (2837.59^min - 2841.89^max) MB/s +102%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2750 (2675.05^min - 2750.14^max) MB/s +96%
Average of class Gaming (313 - 6172, n=196, last 2 years)	2576 MB/s +83%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1535 (1515.74^min - 1535.37^max) MB/s +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1528 (1477.56^min - 1527.59^max) MB/s +9%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1404 (1371.85^min - 1404.22^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2786 (2543.84^min - 2785.68^max) MB/s +461%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2679 (2487.07^min - 2678.86^max) MB/s +439%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2658 (2651.88^min - 2657.7^max) MB/s +435%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (422 - 3548, n=29)	2271 MB/s +357%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=196, last 2 years)	2147 MB/s +332%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	585 (555.77^min - 584.61^max) MB/s +18%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	539 (505.45^min - 539.19^max) MB/s +8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	497 (485.81^min - 496.85^max) MB/s

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7400 Points +26%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (4850 - 9031, n=28)	7378 Points +26%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7356 Points +25%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7009 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming (1923 - 13854, n=184, last 2 years)	6784 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6475 Points +10%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5985 Points +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5878 Points
Score Read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2855 Points +57%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2814 Points +54%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1535 - 3399, n=28)	2746 Points +51%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2709 Points +49%
Average of class Gaming (528 - 4721, n=184, last 2 years)	2489 Points +36%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1994 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1957 Points +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1824 Points
Score Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3614 Points +12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1081 - 3999, n=28)	3296 Points +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3221 Points
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3144 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3128 Points -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	3093 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=184, last 2 years)	3089 Points -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2930 Points -9%
Seq Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2591 - 9971, n=28)	5538 MB/s +15%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5396.69 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	5348.25 MB/s +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	5232 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4996.87 MB/s +4%
Average of class Gaming (1759 - 12763, n=184, last 2 years)	4937 MB/s +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4821 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4531.51 MB/s -6%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4539.36 MB/s +67%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4336 MB/s +59%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4186.78 MB/s +54%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1900 - 8590, n=28)	4074 MB/s +50%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=184, last 2 years)	3647 MB/s +34%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2851.98 MB/s +5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2725 MB/s
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	2667.04 MB/s -2%
4K Read
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	73.81 MB/s +48%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (49.8 - 86.4, n=28)	73.2 MB/s +47%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	67.72 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (30.4 - 112.1, n=184, last 2 years)	66.7 MB/s +34%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	64.38 MB/s +29%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	63.8 MB/s +28%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	61.45 MB/s +24%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	49.75 MB/s
4K Write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	247.26 MB/s +75%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	212.27 MB/s +50%
Average of class Gaming (96.3 - 512, n=184, last 2 years)	210 MB/s +48%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	203.82 MB/s +44%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (112.6 - 254, n=28)	202 MB/s +43%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	160.74 MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	143.61 MB/s +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	141.54 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2264.38 MB/s +75%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2218.05 MB/s +72%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2191.95 MB/s +70%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (918 - 2811, n=28)	2119 MB/s +64%
Average of class Gaming (312 - 3475, n=184, last 2 years)	1923 MB/s +49%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1393.84 MB/s +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1380.56 MB/s +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1292.41 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3168.51 MB/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2807.18 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (567 - 3414, n=28)	2687 MB/s -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	2579.14 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2546.85 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=184, last 2 years)	2517 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2490.61 MB/s -11%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2298.82 MB/s -18%
Access Time Read
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.078 ms *
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=182, last 2 years)	0.05422 ms * +30%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.045 ms * +42%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.036 ms * +54%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (0.018 - 0.078, n=28)	0.03364 ms * +57%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.028 ms * +64%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.027 ms * +65%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.076 ms * -162%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=184, last 2 years)	0.04705 ms * -62%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (0.017 - 0.076, n=28)	0.02943 ms * -1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.029 ms *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.027 ms * +7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.022 ms * +24%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.021 ms * +28%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.016 ms * +45%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Corsair Voyager a1600: Ø6086 (5628.61-6111.88)

Placa gráfica

A AMD Radeon RX 6800M é uma placa gráfica rápida e dedicada, equipada com 12 GB de VRAM. A série AMD 6000 atual para notebooks também oferece núcleos RT separados para cálculos de traçado de raio graças ao RDNA2. No teste, o Corsair Voyager a1600 pode apresentar um bom desempenho 3D. A diferença para os concorrentes com GeForce RTX 3080 Ti chip gráfico é parcialmente pequena. Basicamente, o Corsair Voyager a1600 oferece desempenho suficiente, o que atualmente é suficiente para trazer muitos jogos modernos suavemente para a tela. A CPU sempre obtém a performance ideal da GPU através da tecnologia Smart Shift da AMD.

No modo 2D, a iGPU da AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS faz o trabalho e assim economiza energia.

Para mais comparações e referências, por favor consulte nossoG Quadro comparativo de PU.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	99.3 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	91.9 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M	91.9 pt
Average of class Gaming	90 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	86.7 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	81 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	78.5 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	42089 Points +8%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (39075 - 41706, n=2)	40391 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=229, last 2 years)	40173 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	39075 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	37288 Points -5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	36065 Points -8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	34141 Points -13%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	177650 Points +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	170020 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	144658 Points -15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	144426 Points -15%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (91327 - 170020, n=3)	140735 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)	135868 Points -20%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	108854 Points -36%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (30507 - 34993, n=3)	33233 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	32853 Points +8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	30507 Points
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=233, last 2 years)	29268 Points -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	28006 Points -8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	26612 Points -13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	25891 Points -15%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=231, last 2 years)	11960 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	11762 Points +13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	11076 Points +6%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (10439 - 11316, n=4)	11067 Points +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	10439 Points
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	10404 Points 0%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	9980 Points -4%

3DMark 05 Standard		57639 pontos
3DMark 06 Standard Score		46732 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result		77244 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		30013 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		209564 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		59585 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		25639 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		13599 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		10391 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU ()	380 Seconds * -503%
Average of class Gaming (51 - 668, n=15, last 2 years)	275 Seconds * -337%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	63 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	51 Seconds * +19%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	382 Seconds *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	378 Seconds * +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (285 - 459, n=16)	376 Seconds * +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	372 Seconds * +3%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=195, last 2 years)	317 Seconds * +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (261 - 429, n=13)	295 Seconds * +23%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	268 Seconds * +30%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	42 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (36 - 46, n=16)	41.4 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)	39.5 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	36 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (32 - 41, n=13)	35 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (22 - 30, n=15)	25.3 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (9 - 142, n=176, last 2 years)	23.3 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (20 - 28, n=13)	23.1 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	23 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	251 fps +41%
Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 449, n=165, last 2 years)	218 fps +23%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	208.1 (192^min) fps +17%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	189 fps +6%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (177.8 - 199, n=2)	188.4 fps +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	188 (156^min) fps +6%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	186.6 (141^min) fps +5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	177.8 (43.6^min, 105.5^P0.1, 142.7^P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	118.1 (112^min) fps +9%
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=225, last 2 years)	116.1 fps +8%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	114.4 (108^min, 109^P1) fps +6%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (108 - 110, n=2)	109 fps +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	108 (38^min, 58.3^P0.1, 88.2^P1) fps
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	102.1 (82^min) fps -5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	97.8 fps -9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	97.7 (83^min) fps -10%

GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	183.4 (2.86^min, 142.9^P1) fps +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	176.1 (2.91^min, 111.1^P1) fps +13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	173.9 (3.58^min, 125^P1) fps +11%
Average of class Gaming (15.3 - 187.1, n=180, last 2 years)	163.2 fps +4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	162.4 (8.03^min, 90.9^P1) fps +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	156.3 fps 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	156.2 (7.96^min, 76.9^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (124 - 156.2, n=2)	140.1 fps -10%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	113 (10.1^min, 71.4^P1) fps +22%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	111.4 (6.89^min, 66.7^P1) fps +20%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	110.2 (10.6^min, 76.9^P1) fps +19%
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=215, last 2 years)	106.7 fps +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	96.9 (7.1^min, 62.5^P1) fps +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.6 fps +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	92.8 (6.46^min, 55.6^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (75.1 - 92.8, n=2)	84 fps -9%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	163.9 fps +30%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	148.5 fps +18%
Average of class Gaming (13 - 230, n=173, last 2 years)	143.4 fps +14%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	134.7 fps +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	131 (51^min) fps +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	125.6 fps
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	123.5 fps -2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (118 - 125.6, n=2)	121.8 fps -3%
1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121.2 fps +24%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	111.9 fps +15%
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=225, last 2 years)	110.5 fps +13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	103.9 fps +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.6 (59^min) fps +2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (97.5 - 99.7, n=2)	98.6 fps +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	97.5 fps
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.9 fps -3%

F1 2021
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	297 (230^min) fps +29%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	246 (211^min, 167^P1) fps +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	231 (185^min, 141^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (20.7 - 470, n=46, last 2 years)	221 fps -4%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (187 - 231, n=2)	209 fps -10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	182.1 (157^min, 116^P1) fps -21%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	146 (121^min) fps +18%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	124.1 (104^min, 92^P1) fps
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121.9 (100^min, 78^P1) fps -2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (114 - 124.1, n=2)	119.1 fps -4%
Average of class Gaming (13.5 - 271, n=63, last 2 years)	118.4 fps -5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	97.5 (82^min, 69^P1) fps -21%

X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	120.2 fps +165%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	112.5 fps +148%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	103.1 fps +128%
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=240, last 2 years)	101.2 fps +123%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	70.8 fps +56%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (45.3 - 50.4, n=2)	47.9 fps +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	45.3 fps
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	44.1 fps -3%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	150.5 fps +197%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	141.3 fps +179%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	130.8 fps +158%
Average of class Gaming (13.7 - 193.1, n=231, last 2 years)	127.3 fps +151%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	87.9 fps +73%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (50.7 - 61.4, n=2)	56.1 fps +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	51.2 fps +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	50.7 fps

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	166 fps +52%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 232, n=113, last 2 years)	134.4 fps +23%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	113 fps +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	109 (87^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (95 - 109, n=2)	102 fps -6%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	153 fps +51%
Average of class Gaming (14 - 218, n=123, last 2 years)	125.8 fps +25%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	109 fps +8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	101 (78^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (89 - 101, n=3)	95 fps -6%

Strange Brigade
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	224 (140^min, 162.1^P1) fps +9%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	206 (116.9^min, 151.5^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=223, last 2 years)	205 fps 0%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (179 - 206, n=3)	188.3 fps -9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	171.2 (74.4^min, 123.2^P1) fps -17%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	167.2 (107.5^min, 131.7^P1) fps -19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	146.6 (72.6^min, 102.4^P1) fps -29%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	137.6 (22.6^min, 94^P1) fps -33%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	261 (74.9^min, 186.3^P1) fps +14%
Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 465, n=188, last 2 years)	230 fps 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	229 (152.3^min, 169.8^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (192 - 229, n=2)	211 fps -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	189.4 (106.8^min, 136.7^P1) fps -17%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	184 (117.2^min, 131.2^P1) fps -20%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	164.1 (81.9^min, 109.9^P1) fps -28%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	156 (44^min, 107.5^P1) fps -32%

Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	177.8 (154.9^min) fps +42%
Average of class Gaming (30.9 - 244, n=234, last 2 years)	151.8 fps +21%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	151.4 (134.2^min) fps +21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	149.1 (131.9^min) fps +19%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	125.5 (105.8^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	125.5 fps 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	116 (100.1^min) fps -8%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	113.7 (86.4^min) fps -9%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	168 (144.9^min) fps +46%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	145.2 (127.1^min) fps +26%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	144 (127.1^min) fps +25%
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=235, last 2 years)	142.1 fps +24%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	114.8 (94.7^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	114.8 fps 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	112.1 (93.8^min) fps -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	95.2 (75.3^min) fps -17%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M: Ø112.7 (97.284-143.2)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	177.1	172	156.2	92.8	84	85.4
The Witcher 3 (2015)	309	236	177.8	108		59.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	146.1	126.2	125.5	114.8		95.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	160.8	125.6	97.5		71	41.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	60	50.7	45.3			28.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)	129	113	109	101	100	61
Strange Brigade (2018)	394	258	229	206	145	77.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	143.9	119.7	112.8	106.1	80.5	43.2
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	111	97	94	86	82	62
Metro Exodus (2019)	205	137.4	99.8	78.7	61.4	37.1
Borderlands 3 (2019)	116.1	100.1	89.2	77.6	57	30.3
F1 2020 (2020)	305	247	228	172.4	127.4	70.2
Dirt 5 (2020)	242	154	121	95	76	47
F1 2021 (2021)	342	277	231	124.1	88.2	47.6
New World (2021)	122.5	103	83.7	66.2		34.1
Forza Horizon 5 (2021)	213	165	159	97	79	50
God of War (2022)	88.6	88.3	85.4	68.4	53	33.8
GRID Legends (2022)	233	205	171.2	144.1	115.8	72.8
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	122.5	95.5	82	76.9	48.1	22.1
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	196.7	161.5	104.6	80.5	54.9	28.2
F1 22 (2022)	226	226	192.3	49.7	29.9	13.8
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022)	104.9	82.5	61.4	46	32.8	17.9
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022)	93.4	87.9	80.7	76.3	59.2	33.7
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022)	90.8	94.2	88.6	82.5	63.2	38.1

Emissões e Energia - Não deve ser ignorado

Emissões sonoras

As emissões sonoras medidas quase mostram um resultado típico para um laptop para jogos. No entanto, os 51,1 dB(A) medidos são percebidos alto e subjetivamente como significativamente mais altos. A razão é o ruído do ventilador de freqüência muito alta. A única solução é selecionar o perfil Equilibrado ou Silencioso. O nível de ruído cai para 46 e 36 dB(A) respectivamente no teste de estresse.

Barulho

Ocioso		30.5 / 30.6 / 30.7 dB
Carga		44.5 / 51.1 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.9 dB(A)

	Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
Noise		7%	22%	0%	-3%	5%
off / environment *	29.9	25.5 15%	22.8 24%	26 13%	26 13%	24.5 18%
Idle Minimum *	30.5	25.5 16%	23 25%	26 15%	30 2%	24.5 20%
Idle Average *	30.6	25.5 17%	23 25%	29 5%	31 -1%	30 2%
Idle Maximum *	30.7	27.4 11%	23 25%	34 -11%	33 -7%	32.5 -6%
Load Average *	44.5	49.9 -12%	26.8 40%	50 -12%	49 -10%	43.9 1%
Load Maximum *	51.1	55 -8%	54.2 -6%	56 -10%	57 -12%	54.2 -6%
Witcher 3 ultra *			54.3	53	53	48.8

* ... smaller is better

Temperatura

Corsair Voyager a1600 durante o teste de estresse

Medimos o ponto mais quente na parte inferior da caixa com até 54 °C no teste de esforço. Entretanto, o case também fica bastante quente no lado superior, com pouco mais de 50 °C. A temperatura da caixa cai apenas ligeiramente de 1 a 2 °C durante o jogo.

Durante o teste de estresse, as temperaturas da CPU e da GPU sobem para 95 e 83 °C, respectivamente. No entanto, o SoC ainda relógios com 3,7 GHz em média. A GPU AMD também atinge altas taxas de relógio com pouco menos de 2,2 GHz. O Corsair utiliza um grande sistema de refrigeração com uma câmara de vapor e dois ventiladores.

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


43.3 °C	50.7 °C	41.5 °C
36.3 °C	44.3 °C	33.3 °C
34 °C	31.5 °C	32.2 °C

Máximo: 50.7 °C
Médio: 38.6 °C


36 °C	54.2 °C	36.7 °C
35.5 °C	51 °C	36.3 °C
33.1 °C	36.1 °C	34.4 °C

Máximo: 54.2 °C
Médio: 39.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 63.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


32.4 °C	35.8 °C	32.5 °C
30.8 °C	31.3 °C	31.1 °C
30.1 °C	29.3 °C	30.1 °C

Máximo: 35.8 °C
Médio: 31.5 °C


29.8 °C	33 °C	28.8 °C
31.4 °C	32.5 °C	30.1 °C
30.3 °C	30.2 °C	29.8 °C

Máximo: 33 °C
Médio: 30.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 44.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23.2 °C | FFIRT 550-Pocket

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


42.6 °C	49.2 °C	40.2 °C
35.9 °C	33.5 °C	32.4 °C
33.6 °C	30.6 °C	31.6 °C

Máximo: 49.2 °C
Médio: 36.6 °C


36.5 °C	53.6 °C	36.7 °C
34 °C	49.5 °C	36.3 °C
32.4 °C	35.4 °C	33.9 °C

Máximo: 53.6 °C
Médio: 38.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 59.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.7 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).

	Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat		-3%	14%	8%	14%	-3%
Maximum Upper Side *	50.7	55.1 -9%	37.2 27%	47 7%	41 19%	44.4 12%
Maximum Bottom *	54.2	50.3 7%	43 21%	49 10%	62 -14%	60.8 -12%
Idle Upper Side *	35.8	35.5 1%	34 5%	31 13%	25 30%	33.8 6%
Idle Bottom *	33	36.1 -9%	32.8 1%	32 3%	26 21%	38.8 -18%

* ... smaller is better

Orador

Os dois alto-falantes estão localizados sob os descansos da palma da mão. No entanto, o som é direcionado para cima a partir das grades dos alto-falantes ao lado do teclado. Como acontece com freqüência, os dois alto-falantes não possuem graves, de modo que os médios e agudos predominam claramente. No entanto, recomendamos o uso de fones de ouvido para jogos. Este pode ser conectado ao laptop via USB usando o conector de 3,5 mm ou via Slipstream.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Corsair Voyager a1600 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

Em termos de consumo de energia, medimos cerca de 16 a 22 watts em modo inativo. Sob carga média, registramos cerca de 133 watts, embora picos de até 258 watts sejam alcançados. De acordo com as especificações, a fonte de alimentação pode fornecer 230 watts. No entanto, os picos de carga mais altos não levaram a problemas no teste. A bateria não foi descarregada adicionalmente durante o teste de estresse.

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 2.05 Watt
Ocioso	16.9 / 20.3 / 22.2 Watt
Carga	133.4 / Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Energy consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Corsair Voyager a1600; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø206 (195.6-225)

Corsair Voyager a1600; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø211 (161.5-258)

Energy consumption with an external monitor

Corsair Voyager a1600; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø93.6 (90.5-133.9)

Corsair Voyager a1600; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø105.5 (96.3-142.2)

Corsair Voyager a1600; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø198.4 (190.7-212)

Corsair Voyager a1600; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø211 (194.2-221)

Duração da bateria

Com 99 Wh, o Corsair esgota o máximo em termos de capacidade da bateria. Devido ao consumo relativamente alto de energia ociosa, o dispositivo fica atrás da concorrência no modo ocioso. Entretanto, o Legion 7 da Lenovo pontua ainda pior. Com isto dito, a Voyager a1600 atinge um tempo de funcionamento passível de pouco menos de 6 horas no teste WLAN. O brilho da tela foi de 52% neste teste, o que corresponde às condições gerais de 150 cd/m². O Corsair também acelera notavelmente o desempenho da CPU e da GPU no modo de bateria.

Vida útil da bateria WLAN (brilho máximo)

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		6h 58min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge: 107.0.1418.62)		5h 50min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge: 107.0.1418.62)		4h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 58min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 06min

	Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M, 99 Wh	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 99 Wh	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.98 Wh	HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-31%	-6%	14%	10%	-36%	3%
Reader / Idle	418		293 -30%		603 44%		544 ?(57 - 1290, n=84, last 2 years) 30%
H.264	358			490 37%		306 -15%	399 ?(56 - 747, n=91, last 2 years) 11%
WiFi v1.3	350	339 -3%	436 25%	344 -2%	336 -4%	267 -24%	368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years) 5%
Load	126	53 -58%	110 -13%	133 6%	114 -10%	40 -68%	84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years) -33%
Witcher 3 ultra		51				55	81.6 ?(47 - 155, n=22, last 2 years)

Pro

+ alto desempenho da CPU e GPU

+ 12 GB VRAM

+ 32 GB DDR5 RAM

+ sSD DE 2 TB

+ muito bom acabamento

+ design fino

+ visor rápido e calibrado de 240 Hz

+ sem PWM e sem turvação

+ touchpad muito grande

+ chaves mecânicas com chaves Cherry MX

+ Características do deck Elgato Stream

+ Corsair Slipstream

Contra

- ruído do ventilador de alta freqüência

- sem opção 4K

- desempenho abaixo da média de SSD

- somente webcam Full HD

- sem RJ-45

Veredicto - Jogador versátil de notebook e streamer

O Corsair Voyager a1600 em revisão: fornecido pelo Corsair Alemanha

A Corsair criou um dispositivo realmente fantástico com o Voyager a1600. A combinação de AMD SoC e AMD GPU é boa e é bastante convincente no teste. Muitas vezes ela tem que admitir a derrota no duelo direto com o atual SoC da Intel. Entretanto, as diferenças de desempenho não são realmente perceptíveis. O Voyager a1600 parece particularmente high-end devido à seleção do material, o que também dá ao dispositivo uma estabilidade muito boa. O dispositivo não parece nada desajeitado

A conectividade acaba sendo um pouco espartana à primeira vista. Entretanto, aqueles que confiam na tecnologia Slipstream para conectar periféricos dificilmente sentirão falta das portas USB tipo A ausentes.

O Ryzen 9 6900HS da AMD tem um bom e consistente desempenho sem muita perda de desempenho sob carga. Também podemos atestar o mesmo para o Radeon RX 6800M da AMD. Gostamos da exibição no formato 16:10. Os únicos inconvenientes são o brilho um pouco baixo e a cobertura não-quase-perfeita dos espaços de cor AdobeRGB e P3, o que exclui o uso profissional para edição de vídeo ou foto. Como um laptop para jogos, porém, o Corsair Voyager a1600 pode facilmente passar sem eles.

O Corsair Voyager a1600 é mais do que um puro notebook para jogos, pois suas grandes características o tornam o dispositivo perfeito para streamers e criadores de conteúdo.

Entretanto, com as características únicas de streaming, a Voyager a1600 será lembrada. Os botões de início rápido, que podem ser atribuídos conforme desejado, servem para streamers e você pode fazer sem um deck de streaming adicional. Dito isto, devido ao uso pretendido, teríamos desejado uma câmera de maior qualidade que não se destina apenas a servir como uma solução de emergência móvel. O maior inconveniente do Corsair Voyager a1600 é a unidade de resfriamento embutida. As temperaturas permanecem dentro dos limites sob carga, sem dúvida, mas ainda assim, o nível de ruído medido é muito alto no desempenho máximo. Aqueles que renunciarem ao modo Extremo serão recompensados com baixas emissões, mas também terão algum desempenho ao mesmo tempo.

Preço e disponibilidade

O Corsair Voyager a1600 está disponível diretamente na loja Corsair onde você tem que pagar 3.550 Euros pela configuração testada. Alternativamente, Amazon vende o mesmo modelo por atualmente 3.540 Euros. A configuração mais barata com um Ryzen 7 6800HS e 16 GB de RAM também está disponível na Amazon por 2.725 Euros.

Corsair Voyager a1600 - 2022-12-05 12/05/2022 v7
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento

91 / 98 → 92%

Teclado

88%

Mouse

86%

Conectividade

62 / 80 → 78%

Peso

60 / 10-66 → 90%

Bateria

66 / 95 → 70%

Pantalha

89%

Desempenho do jogos

98%

Desempenho da aplicação

96%

Temperatura

83 / 95 → 87%

Ruído

72 / 90 → 80%

Audio

56%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Médio

77%

87%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388017 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Corsair Voyager um laptop 1600 em revisão: Potência AMD total para gamers, streamers e criadores

Sebastian Bade, 2022-12-14 (Update: 2022-12-14)