Análise do Beelink GTI15 Ultra: Um dos mini PCs mais completos para seu tamanho

Name: Beelink GTI15 Ultra
Brand: Beelink

Alto-falantes e microfones integrados.

O GTI15 Ultra é ainda mais rápido do que antes, com Arrow Lake-H e portas LAN RJ-45 de 10 Gbps. No entanto, os alto-falantes ainda não melhoraram desde a época do GTI13 Ultra.
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzido por DeepL / Ninh Duy) Publicado 11/30/2025 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
Arrow Lake Mini PC

Veredicto - Otimizado para ativação por voz, desempenho e aceleração de IA

O GTI12 Ultra foi um grande avanço em relação ao GTI11, pois tinha um design totalmente novo. O GTI15 Ultra utiliza o mesmo design do GTI12 Ultra, mas as atualizações no desempenho do processador são significativas o suficiente para ser um upgrade que vale a pena para os caçadores de desempenho. Os alto-falantes estéreo integrados, os microfones quádruplos, a PSU e o suporte a eGPU apenas tornam o sistema Beelink mais limpo e mais versátil do que a maioria dos outros minicomputadores do mercado, inclusive os da GMK.

Dispositivo de teste cortesia de Beelink

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Alguns aspectos do modelo poderiam ser ainda melhores. Os alto-falantes integrados, por exemplo, poderiam ser mais altos para salas maiores ou conferências. A desmontagem sem ferramentas também facilitaria muito a limpeza ou o upgrade da RAM e do SSD. Uma barra ou indicador LED RGB na parte frontal da unidade combinaria bem com os quatro microfones e o recurso de ativação por voz. Por outro lado, o GTI15 Ultra é um dos minicomputadores mais completos que já testamos, considerando sua longa lista de recursos integrados e o suporte dedicado à eGPU.

O alto preço do GTI15 Ultra não pode ser ignorado, pois o modelo foi lançado durante uma escassez mundial de RAM e SSD. Com um preço bem acima de US$ 1.000, o sistema é significativamente mais caro do que os modelos GTI13 ou GTI14. Infelizmente, a Beelink não oferece nenhuma opção barebone para ajudar a reduzir os preços iniciais.

Pro

+ alto-falantes estéreo integrados e microfone quádruplo

+ pSU integrada, sem necessidade de adaptador CA

+ suporte a eGPU via PCIe5 x8 direto

+ rJ-45 duplo de 10 Gbps

+ relativamente silencioso

Contra

- mais pesado e maior do que o mini PC comum

- a manutenção é mais complexa

- os alto-falantes poderiam ser mais altos

Preço e disponibilidade

O Beelink GTI15 Ultra já está sendo vendido na Amazon por US$ 1230, conforme configurado nesta análise.

$1,229.00

Beelink GTi15 Mini PC, Intel Ultra 9 285H (up to 5.4GHz) 16C/16T, Mini Computer 64GB DDR5 6400MHz 1TB PCIe4.0 SSD, Triple Display HDMI&DP/USB-C/WiFi7/BT5.4/NPU/4K 144Hz/Support AI/W-11 Pro

Índice

Veredicto - Otimizado para ativação por voz, desempenho e aceleração de IA
Especificações
Caso
Conectividade
Desempenho
Emissões
Gerenciamento de energia
Classificação do Notebookcheck
Concorrentes potenciais em comparação

O GTI15 Ultra é uma atualização interna do GTI14 Ultra do ano passado ou do GTI13 Ultra. Ele substitui o processador Raptor Lake-H mais antigo pelas opções mais recentes do Arrow Lake-H, além de outras pequenas alterações externas. Seu chassi é praticamente idêntico ao do GTI13 Ultra e, portanto, muitos de nossos comentários existentes ainda se aplicam a esse modelo mais recente.

Nossa unidade de teste vem com CPU Core Ultra 9 285H, 64 GB de RAM e SSD de 1 TB por aproximadamente US$ 1230. As opções mais sofisticadas aumentam a RAM e o SSD para 128 GB e 2 TB, respectivamente, mas, infelizmente, não há opções básicas.

O GTI15 Ultra concorre com outros mini PCs de alto desempenho, como o GMK EVO-T1 ou o BOSGAME M2.

Mais análises da Beelink:

Especificações

Beelink GTI15 Ultra

Processador

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H 16 x 4.5 - 5.4 GHz, 54 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-H

Placa gráfica

Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Análises do: 2350 MHz, DDR5, 32.0.101.8247

Memória

64 GB

, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, Micron, 46-45-45-90

placa mãe

Intel Arrow Lake-H PCH

Placa de Som

Intel Arrow Lake-U/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Conexões

4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB4 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD

Funcionamento em rede

Intel E610-XT2 (10/100/1000/2500/5000/10000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 55.8 x 158 x 158

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo, Iluminação do Teclado: não, HDMI cable, Control Center, 12 Meses Garantia

peso

1.32 kg, Suprimento de energia: 73 g

Preço

1200 USD

Amazon

$1,229.00

Links

Beelink página inicial

Nota: O fabricante pode utilizar componentes de diferentes fornecedores, incluindo painéis de exibição, unidades ou cartões de memória com especificações semelhantes.

veja todas as especificações

Caso

O GTI15 Ultra apresenta alto-falantes integrados e uma PSU interna de 145 W para se diferenciar da concorrência, assim como no GTI13 Ultra. Isso significa que o sistema requer apenas um cabo de alimentação universal comum em vez de adaptadores CA especializados, ao contrário da grande maioria dos mini PCs ou laptops do mercado. Por outro lado, no entanto, o sistema é um pouco maior e mais pesado para a categoria.

A estação de acoplamento EX Pro continua a ser suportada pelo slot PCIe5 x8 embaixo do mini PC para a instalação de gráficos externos. Mais informações sobre o dock podem ser encontradas em nossa análise aqui.

Comparação de tamanhos

Conectividade

Nem todas as portas do GTI13 Ultra retornaram, pois o GTI15 Ultra tem duas portas USB-A a menos na parte traseira. Por outro lado, as duas portas RJ-45 foram atualizadas de 2,5 Gbps para 10 Gbps cada.

Observe que apenas a porta USB-C traseira é compatível com Power Delivery. O Thunderbolt não é oficialmente suportado.

Traseira: Entrada de alimentação CA, USB-C 4.0 com DisplayPort 1.4 + Power Delivery (40 Gbps), fone de ouvido de 3,5 mm, HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a, 2x RJ-45 (10 Gbps), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2 (10 Gbps)

Leitor de cartão SD

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	206 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	249.6 MB/s

Comunicação

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1405 (1297^min - 1536^max) MBit/s +29%
GMK NucBox K12 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1193 (1001^min - 1325^max) MBit/s +9%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1189 (589^min - 1283^max) MBit/s +9%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1093 (623^min - 1267^max) MBit/s
BOSGAME M2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1048 (916^min - 1169^max) MBit/s -4%
Beelink SER9 Pro	580 (458^min - 645^max) MBit/s -47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1582 (1543^min - 1618^max) MBit/s +12%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1414 (1250^min - 1521^max) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1152 (616^min - 1293^max) MBit/s -19%
BOSGAME M2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1048 (830^min - 1181^max) MBit/s -26%
Beelink SER9 Pro	851 (780^min - 908^max) MBit/s -40%
GMK NucBox K12 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	819 (705^min - 979^max) MBit/s -42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1094 (963^min - 1211^max) MBit/s +11%
BOSGAME M2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1008 (959^min - 1072^max) MBit/s +2%
GMK NucBox K12 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	999 (530^min - 1123^max) MBit/s +2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	984 (805^min - 1153^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1090 (1026^min - 1157^max) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1008 (911^min - 1052^max) MBit/s -8%
GMK NucBox K12 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	860 (829^min - 889^max) MBit/s -21%
BOSGAME M2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	729 (652^min - 857^max) MBit/s -33%

Beelink GTI15 Ultra; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø984 (805-1153)

Beelink GTI15 Ultra; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1090 (1026-1157)

Manutenção

A manutenção é mais complexa nos modelos SEI mais novos devido à PSU e aos alto-falantes integrados. Os módulos de RAM e SSD ficam embaixo da PSU, dos alto-falantes, da malha metálica de proteção e da tampa externa de plástico, todos presos por pelo menos uma dúzia de parafusos Phillips. A maioria dos outros mini PCs tende a ser mais fácil e simples de desmontar.

O cooler e a ventoinha da câmara de vapor ficam no lado oposto da placa-mãe, o que dificulta a limpeza. Entretanto, essa característica é comum na maioria dos designs de minicomputadores.

O acesso aos dois slots SODIMM e aos dois slots SSD M.2 2280 requer desmontagem adicional

Sustentabilidade

A Beelink não declarou o uso de nenhum material reciclado durante a fabricação. Entretanto, a embalagem utiliza um pouco de plástico para o invólucro.

Desempenho

Condições de teste

Por padrão, o sistema é definido para o modo balanceado, que só pode ser alterado para o modo de desempenho por meio do BIOS. A configuração do Windows para o modo de desempenho tem efeito mínimo ou nulo.

Processador

O desempenho bruto da CPU é cerca de 10 a 15 por cento mais lento do que no GMK EVO-T1 configurado exatamente com o mesmo Core Ultra 9 285H em execução no modo Performance. A configuração do Beelink para o modo Performance via BIOS ajuda a diminuir a diferença, se o senhor desejar um desempenho adicional. Apesar disso, a CPU Intel é até 10% e 20% mais rápida do que o concorrente Ryzen 7 H 255 ao executar cargas single-threaded e multi-threaded, respectivamente.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H: Ø2582 (2556.24-2596.05)

Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255: Ø2565 (2544.37-2588.16)

GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255: Ø2505 (2493.14-2513.98)

GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H: Ø3047 (3002.55-3112.11)

BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2493 (2069.54-2584.65)

Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700: Ø3227 (2729.26-4061.33)

Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK: Ø2398 (2374.03-2412.84)

CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance rating
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	88 pt
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	75.9 pt
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	67.2 pt
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	66.8 pt
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	65.7 pt
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	65.3 pt
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	64 pt
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	60.7 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	58.2 pt
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	58.1 pt
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	57.7 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	54.3 pt
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	51 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	48.7 pt
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	43.6 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	37334 Points +107%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	28398 (19650.3^min - 28397.7^max) Points +58%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	20681 Points +15%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (15070 - 23576, n=9)	19726 Points +10%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	18903 Points +5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	17995 (17785.9^min - 17994.8^max) Points
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	16402 (16130.8^min - 16402.1^max) Points -9%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	16304 (16095.8^min - 16304.1^max) Points -9%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	16148 (15722.4^min - 16148.2^max) Points -10%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	15871 (15687.6^min - 15871.1^max) Points -12%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	15746 (15036.2^min - 15746.1^max) Points -12%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	15506 Points -14%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	14516 Points -19%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	13015 Points -28%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	10524 (10414.4^min - 10524.2^max) Points -42%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2105 Points +2%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (1979 - 2164, n=9)	2099 Points +1%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	2089 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	2080 Points 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2071 Points
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	2052 Points -1%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2025 Points -2%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	1957 Points -6%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1754 Points -15%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	1731 Points -16%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1721 Points -17%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	1718 Points -17%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1715 Points -17%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	1697 Points -18%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	1426 Points -31%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	14564 Points +108%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	10501 Points +50%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	8068 Points +15%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (5861 - 9208, n=9)	7677 Points +9%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	7378 Points +5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	7014 Points
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	6480 Points -8%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6293 Points -10%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	6255 Points -11%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	6235 Points -11%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	6117 Points -13%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	6051 Points -14%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5617 Points -20%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	5013 Points -29%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	4121 Points -41%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	809 Points +2%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (761 - 830, n=9)	809 Points +2%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	801 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	798 Points +1%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	798 Points +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	793 Points
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	792 Points 0%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	741 Points -7%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	679 Points -14%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	677 Points -15%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	671 Points -15%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	660 Points -17%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	659 Points -17%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	622 Points -22%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	549 Points -31%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	5881 Points +127%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	4061 (2729.26^min - 4061.33^max) Points +56%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3137 Points +21%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (2280 - 3496, n=9)	3020 Points +16%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2860 Points +10%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2596 (2556.24^min - 2596.05^max) Points
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	2588 (2544.37^min - 2588.16^max) Points 0%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2585 (2069.54^min - 2584.65^max) Points 0%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	2514 (2493.14^min - 2513.98^max) Points -3%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	2413 (2374.03^min - 2412.84^max) Points -7%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	2383 (2314.15^min - 2382.8^max) Points -8%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	2370 Points -9%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2260 Points -13%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2141 Points -18%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	1488 (1459.06^min - 1488.32^max) Points -43%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	317 Points +3%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	310 Points 0%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	309 Points 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	309 Points
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (288 - 322, n=9)	309 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	299 Points -3%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	297 Points -4%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	296 Points -4%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	276 Points -11%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	273 Points -12%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	266 Points -14%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	258 Points -17%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	248 Points -20%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	245 Points -21%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	204 Points -34%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	326 Seconds * -76%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	262 Seconds * -42%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	228 Seconds * -23%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	208 Seconds * -12%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	203 Seconds * -10%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	200 Seconds * -8%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	197 Seconds * -6%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	197 Seconds * -6%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	194 Seconds * -5%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (151 - 235, n=9)	187.9 Seconds * -2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	185 Seconds *
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	176 Seconds * +5%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	166 Seconds * +10%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	123 Seconds * +34%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	86 Seconds * +54%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	136872 MIPS +121%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	102982 MIPS +66%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	74358 MIPS +20%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	69787 MIPS +13%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	69688 MIPS +13%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	68893 MIPS +11%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	68394 MIPS +10%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	67869 MIPS +10%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	65478 MIPS +6%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (50116 - 71959, n=9)	62471 MIPS +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	61940 MIPS
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	52479 MIPS -15%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	50278 MIPS -19%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	34645 MIPS -44%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	0 MIPS -100%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	6845 MIPS +11%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	6516 MIPS +6%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	6515 MIPS +6%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	6497 MIPS +5%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6358 MIPS +3%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	6321 MIPS +3%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6310 MIPS +2%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	6261 MIPS +2%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	6237 MIPS +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	6164 MIPS
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (5403 - 6419, n=9)	6085 MIPS -1%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	6039 MIPS -2%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	5816 MIPS -6%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5136 MIPS -17%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	4461 MIPS -28%

Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	22157 Points +45%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (15284 - 17992, n=12)	16370 Points +7%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	15339 Points 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	15284 Points
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	14220 Points -7%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	14072 Points -8%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	13345 Points -13%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	13309 Points -13%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	12825 Points -16%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	12685 Points -17%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	12515 Points -18%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	11749 Points -23%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11358 Points -26%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	8964 Points -41%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	7103 Points -54%

Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	2929 Points +2%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2899 Points +1%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (2665 - 3110, n=12)	2890 Points 0%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	2883 Points 0%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2878 Points 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2878 Points
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	2876 Points 0%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	2748 Points -5%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2722 Points -5%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	2617 Points -9%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2580 Points -10%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	2546 Points -12%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	2545 Points -12%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2316 Points -20%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	1849 Points -36%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	24593 Points +77%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (13140 - 17487, n=10)	15363 Points +10%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	15175 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	15052 Points +8%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	14211 Points +2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	13908 Points
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	12597 Points -9%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12244 Points -12%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	11980 Points -14%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	11614 Points -16%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	11604 Points -17%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11283 Points -19%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10856 Points -22%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	7927 Points -43%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	7574 Points -46%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	2240 Points +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2111 Points
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2080 Points -1%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (1911 - 2256, n=10)	2071 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	2057 Points -3%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2024 Points -4%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	2022 Points -4%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	1996 Points -5%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1993 Points -6%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	1924 Points -9%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	1880 Points -11%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1841 Points -13%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	1810 Points -14%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1685 Points -20%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	1315 Points -38%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	40.3 fps +88%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	27.4 fps +28%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	23.6 fps +10%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (17.9 - 27.2, n=9)	22.8 fps +7%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	22.7 fps +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	21.4 fps
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	21.2 fps -1%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	20.4 fps -5%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	19.9 fps -7%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	19.8 fps -7%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	18.3 fps -14%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	15.7 fps -27%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	15.6 fps -27%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	14.1 fps -34%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	13.3 fps -38%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	61.2 s * -50%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	58.4 s * -43%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	56 s * -37%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	55.7 s * -37%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	54.3 s * -33%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	53.1 s * -30%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	51.4 s * -26%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	51 s * -25%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (39.7 - 54.3, n=9)	45.5 s * -12%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	45.1 s * -11%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	42.7 s * -5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	40.8 s *
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	39.4 s * +3%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	37.3 s * +9%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	33.1 s * +19%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	0.653 sec * -49%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	0.503 sec * -15%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	0.4982 sec * -14%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	0.4587 sec * -5%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	0.4544 sec * -4%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	0.4505 sec * -3%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	0.4428 sec * -1%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4395 sec * -1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	0.4372 sec *
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (0.4079 - 0.4794, n=9)	0.4324 sec * +1%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4293 sec * +2%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	0.4119 sec * +6%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	0.4091 sec * +6%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	0.3935 sec * +10%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	0.3927 sec * +10%

* ... menor é melhor

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2596 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

193.2 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

309 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

7014 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

793 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2071 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

17995 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

124.8 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

1031 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Performance rating
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	89.8 pt
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	89.3 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	82.9 pt
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	80.6 pt
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	76 pt
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	70.7 pt
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	67.4 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	26520 KRay/s +40%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	26120 KRay/s +38%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	25404 KRay/s +34%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	24831 KRay/s +31%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	23041 KRay/s +22%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (15160 - 24612, n=9)	20081 KRay/s +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	18930 KRay/s

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	124326 Points +30%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	114534 Points +20%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	113423 Points +19%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	106590 Points +11%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	104302 Points +9%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (54365 - 129641, n=9)	98069 Points +3%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	95675 Points

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	5510 MB/s +25%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	5093 MB/s +16%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	4975 MB/s +13%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	4764 MB/s +8%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (3695 - 5879, n=9)	4647 MB/s +6%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	4604 MB/s +5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	4397 MB/s

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	151670 Points +183%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	119475 Points +123%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	115748 Points +116%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	111673 Points +109%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (53557 - 67157, n=9)	62714 Points +17%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	58606 Points +9%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	53557 Points

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	15218 Points +86%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	15211 Points +86%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	15123 Points +85%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	14626 Points +79%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	8187 Points
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (6921 - 9378, n=9)	8147 Points 0%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	8074 Points -1%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	60656 Points +20%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	60518 Points +20%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	60511 Points +20%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	57378 Points +14%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	56019 Points +11%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (40946 - 64632, n=9)	52816 Points +5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	50451 Points

AIDA64 / CPU AES
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	171350 MB/s +165%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	114494 MB/s +77%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	86090 MB/s +33%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	83999 MB/s +30%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (58110 - 117613, n=9)	76476 MB/s +18%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	72638 MB/s +12%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	64670 MB/s

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	1585 MB/s +50%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	1167 MB/s +10%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (574 - 1366, n=9)	1069 MB/s +1%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	1066 MB/s +1%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	1057 MB/s 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	1057 MB/s
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	1036 MB/s -2%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	14133 KRay/s +35%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	13941 KRay/s +33%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	13694 KRay/s +31%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	12713 KRay/s +22%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	12576 KRay/s +20%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (5509 - 13527, n=9)	10448 KRay/s 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	10447 KRay/s

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (49874 - 65229, n=9)	58083 MPixel/s +4%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	55590 MPixel/s
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	53330 MPixel/s -4%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	41649 MPixel/s -25%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	41567 MPixel/s -25%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	40115 MPixel/s -28%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	24892 MPixel/s -55%

Desempenho do sistema

Performance rating
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	91.4 pt
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	87.1 pt
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	86 pt
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	84.6 pt
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	78.4 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	74.3 pt
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	73.6 pt

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	8855 Points +18%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	7798 Points +4%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (7492 - 7873, n=6)	7708 Points +3%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	7492 Points
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	7377 Points -2%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	6959 Points -7%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	6907 Points -8%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	11997 Points +7%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	11218 Points
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	11061 Points -1%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (10307 - 11218, n=6)	10904 Points -3%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10502 Points -6%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10377 Points -7%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10307 Points -8%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	11342 Points +20%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10667 Points +13%
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	9919 Points +5%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (8818 - 10667, n=6)	9640 Points +2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	9444 Points
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	9440 Points 0%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	9325 Points -1%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	13849 Points +29%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (10773 - 12660, n=6)	11861 Points +10%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	11705 Points +9%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	10773 Points
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	9929 Points -8%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	9243 Points -14%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	9227 Points -14%

CrossMark / Overall
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	2085 Points
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1812 - 2227, n=6)	2051 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	2048 Points -2%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2000 Points -4%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1791 Points -14%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1769 Points -15%
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	1762 Points -15%

CrossMark / Productivity
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	2032 Points
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1693 - 2170, n=6)	1956 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	1937 Points -5%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1927 Points -5%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1733 Points -15%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1709 Points -16%
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	1672 Points -18%

CrossMark / Creativity
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (2125 - 2377, n=6)	2252 Points +2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	2216 Points
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	2192 Points -1%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2161 Points -2%
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	1934 Points -13%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1895 Points -14%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1887 Points -15%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	1972 Points +5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	1876 Points
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1375 - 2191, n=6)	1793 Points -4%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1772 Points -6%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1666 Points -11%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1617 Points -14%
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	1562 Points -17%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	350 Points 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	350 Points
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	342 Points -2%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (280 - 358, n=6)	327 Points -7%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	324 Points -7%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	300 Points -14%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	290 Points -17%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	321 Points
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (254 - 324, n=6)	302 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	300 Points -7%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	287 Points -11%
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	274 Points -15%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	245 Points -24%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	245 Points -24%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	577 ms * -34%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	566 ms * -32%
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	503 ms * -17%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	465 ms * -8%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	454 ms * -6%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (418 - 465, n=6)	439 ms * -2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	430 ms *

* ... menor é melhor

PCMark 10 Score		7492 pontos
Ajuda

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (76816 - 109252, n=9)	92597 MB/s +15%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	80559 MB/s
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	79203 MB/s -2%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	74184 MB/s -8%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	69770 MB/s -13%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	67673 MB/s -16%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	40883 MB/s -49%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (75428 - 85799, n=9)	80578 MB/s +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	79808 MB/s
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	75428 MB/s -5%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	61614 MB/s -23%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	61129 MB/s -23%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	58305 MB/s -27%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	42927 MB/s -46%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	106026 MB/s +31%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	87234 MB/s +8%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	85497 MB/s +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	80726 MB/s
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	77625 MB/s -4%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (62446 - 82553, n=9)	75119 MB/s -7%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	37752 MB/s -53%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	128.3 ns * -18%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (108.4 - 136.7, n=9)	124.7 ns * -15%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	108.4 ns *
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	103.9 ns * +4%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	96.5 ns * +11%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	93.7 ns * +14%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	84.1 ns * +22%

Geekbench AI / Quantized GPU 1.5
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	5954 Points +24%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	5370 Points +12%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	5244 Points +9%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (4803 - 5289, n=3)	5112 Points +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	4803 Points

Geekbench AI / Half Precision GPU 1.5
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	11903 Points +27%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	11370 Points +21%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	11120 Points +19%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (9377 - 11969, n=3)	11083 Points +18%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	9377 Points

Geekbench AI / Single Precision GPU 1.5
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	7966 Points +10%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	7892 Points +9%
Média Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (7262 - 7954, n=3)	7703 Points +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	7262 Points
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	7193 Points -1%

* ... menor é melhor

Latência DPC

O LatencyMon mostra problemas de DPC e dois quadros perdidos registrados ao reproduzir vídeo 4K60

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	3050.8 μs *
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	2421 μs * +21%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1124 μs * +63%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	978.6 μs * +68%
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	843 μs * +72%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	790.7 μs * +74%

* ... menor é melhor

Dispositivos de armazenamento

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6941 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4017 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 822.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 621.8 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 4642 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2894 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 89.42 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 288 MB/s

Drive Performance rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance rating - Percent
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	84.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	82.7 pt
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	70.3 pt
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	60.3 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	50.9 pt
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	48.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	4684 (4668.68^min - 4684.06^max) MB/s
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3100 (3048.82^min - 3099.89^max) MB/s -34%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	2884 (2876.15^min - 2883.79^max) MB/s -38%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	2496 (2483.24^min - 2495.57^max) MB/s -47%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2149 (2136.58^min - 2148.64^max) MB/s -54%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2112 (2077.27^min - 2111.8^max) MB/s -55%
seq write
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4563 (4113.52^min - 4563.08^max) MB/s +70%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	4200 (4067.43^min - 4199.55^max) MB/s +57%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	3151 (2303.72^min - 3150.76^max) MB/s +18%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	2678 (1205.44^min - 2677.64^max) MB/s
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1810 (450.26^min - 1810.21^max) MB/s -32%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1808 (844.51^min - 1808.37^max) MB/s -32%
seq q8 t1 read
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	7027 (6531.58^min - 7026.93^max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	6130 (5491.32^min - 6129.98^max) MB/s -13%
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	5103 (4471.34^min - 5103.21^max) MB/s -27%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4942 (4516.62^min - 4941.52^max) MB/s -30%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4915 (4300^min - 4915.3^max) MB/s -30%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	4071 (3372.85^min - 4070.78^max) MB/s -42%
seq q8 t1 write
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	6409 (2562.3^min - 6408.9^max) MB/s
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4599 (4437.99^min - 4599.05^max) MB/s -28%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	4399 (4254.7^min - 4398.57^max) MB/s -31%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	3164 (3161.46^min - 3163.55^max) MB/s -51%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1803 (883.02^min - 1802.5^max) MB/s -72%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1799 (640.89^min - 1798.7^max) MB/s -72%
4k q1 t1 read
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	88.3 (87.81^min - 88.25^max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	80.2 (77.33^min - 80.16^max) MB/s -9%
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	77 (75.54^min - 77.03^max) MB/s -13%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	62.7 (61.92^min - 62.74^max) MB/s -29%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	54.4 (53.83^min - 54.44^max) MB/s -38%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	50.5 (49.98^min - 50.45^max) MB/s -43%
4k q1 t1 write
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	297 (295.94^min - 296.5^max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	269 (268.19^min - 268.71^max) MB/s -9%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	261 (259.05^min - 260.68^max) MB/s -12%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	254 (91.72^min - 253.66^max) MB/s -14%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	251 (216.59^min - 251.05^max) MB/s -15%
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	242 (231.04^min - 241.7^max) MB/s -19%
4k q32 t16 read
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	4349 (4343.6^min - 4349.02^max) MB/s
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3548 (3523.05^min - 3547.64^max) MB/s -18%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	3369 (3352.24^min - 3369.05^max) MB/s -23%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	784 (747.62^min - 783.51^max) MB/s -82%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	698 (696.34^min - 698.49^max) MB/s -84%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	696 (692.86^min - 696.3^max) MB/s -84%
4k q32 t16 write
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3304 (3139.17^min - 3304.42^max) MB/s +71%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	3032 (2937.1^min - 3032.48^max) MB/s +57%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	2706 (2653.27^min - 2705.82^max) MB/s +40%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	1937 (1313.65^min - 1936.81^max) MB/s
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1786 (636.51^min - 1786.33^max) MB/s -8%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1780 (805.06^min - 1780.2^max) MB/s -8%

AS SSD
Score Total
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	8193 Points +101%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	7758 Points +90%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	4816 Points +18%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	4085 Points
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3778 Points -8%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3482 Points -15%
Score Read
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	3042 Points +59%
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3001 Points +57%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	1915 Points
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	1142 Points -40%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1127 Points -41%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1095 Points -43%
Score Write
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3662 Points +179%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	3208 Points +144%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	3104 Points +136%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2146 Points +63%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1928 Points +47%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	1313 Points
Seq Read
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	5078.19 MB/s +33%
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4229 MB/s +11%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3916.9 MB/s +3%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3870.26 MB/s +2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	3811.12 MB/s
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	3358.16 MB/s -12%
Seq Write
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	4153.85 MB/s +323%
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3985 MB/s +306%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	2751.6 MB/s +181%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2185.55 MB/s +123%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1648.2 MB/s +68%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	980.9 MB/s
4K Read
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	84.6 MB/s +5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	80.76 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	67.29 MB/s -17%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	60.04 MB/s -26%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	52.09 MB/s -36%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	50 MB/s -38%
4K Write
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	263.64 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	229.1 MB/s -13%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	221.74 MB/s -16%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	219.87 MB/s -17%
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	211 MB/s -20%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	190.38 MB/s -28%
4K-64 Read
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2493 MB/s +72%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	2466.73 MB/s +70%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	1453.09 MB/s
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	745.77 MB/s -49%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	688.04 MB/s -53%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	653.44 MB/s -55%
4K-64 Write
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3052 MB/s +221%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	2606.88 MB/s +174%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	2563.51 MB/s +169%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1707.34 MB/s +79%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1572.62 MB/s +65%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	951.67 MB/s
Access Time Read
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.125 ms * -198%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	0.101 ms * -140%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	0.073 ms * -74%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.049 ms * -17%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.048 ms * -14%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	0.042 ms *
Access Time Write
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.097 ms * -26%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.088 ms * -14%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	0.077 ms *
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	0.052 ms * +32%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	0.051 ms * +34%
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.019 ms * +75%

* ... menor é melhor

Limitação de disco: Loop de leitura do DiskSpd, profundidade da fila 8

Beelink GTI15 Ultra ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4627 (4156.56-4864.26)

GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4584 (3983.12-4907.96)

Desempenho da GPU

O Arc 140T é cerca de 20% mais rápido do que o Arc 140V comumente encontrada em muitos notebooks ultrafinos mais novos com Intel Lunar Lake ou até duas vezes mais rápida do que a antiga Iris Graphics 96 EUs. A configuração do BIOS para o modo Performance aumentará o desempenho gráfico em 10 a 15% com base em nosso tempo com o GMK EVO-T1.

A geração de 5 imagens localmente por meio do Intel AI Playground e do Dreamshaper 8 com o prompt "Goldfish" levaria aproximadamente 49 segundos.

3DMark Performance rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance rating - Percent
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Radeon 8060S, AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	100 pt
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, Intel Core i7-14700	92.7 pt
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	32.1 pt
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T	31.1 pt
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	30.1 pt
BOSGAME M2 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	29.9 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	29.5 pt
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	27.8 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	27.8 pt
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	27.6 pt
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	27.5 pt
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	22 pt
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	18.6 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	16.8 pt
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	11.5 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Radeon 8060S, AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	46861 Points +351%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, Intel Core i7-14700	38495 Points +271%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	14935 Points +44%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	14312 Points +38%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	14274 Points +38%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	13430 Points +29%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	13279 Points +28%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	12626 Points +22%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (9684 - 14935, n=17)	12315 Points +19%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	11785 Points +14%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	10381 Points
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	7633 Points -26%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	7424 Points -28%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	7351 Points -29%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	6066 Points -42%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Radeon 8060S, AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	29755 Points +287%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, Intel Core i7-14700	28629 Points +272%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	8904 Points +16%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	8875 Points +15%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	8801 Points +14%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (5433 - 10742, n=17)	8654 Points +12%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	8630 Points +12%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	8408 Points +9%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	8386 Points +9%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	7900 Points +3%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	7696 Points
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	6624 Points -14%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	6209 Points -19%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	5812 Points -24%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	3817 Points -50%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Radeon 8060S, AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	11340 Points +242%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, Intel Core i7-14700	10656 Points +222%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3872 Points +17%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (2466 - 4387, n=17)	3713 Points +12%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3312 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	3205 Points -3%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3167 Points -4%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3152 Points -5%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	3077 Points -7%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	2903 Points -12%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	2863 Points -14%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	2754 Points -17%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	1890 Points -43%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1690 Points -49%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	1067 Points -68%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Radeon 8060S, AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	11284 Points +205%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, Intel Core i7-14700	11097 Points +200%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	4301 Points +16%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (2769 - 4876, n=17)	4107 Points +11%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3705 Points
BOSGAME M2 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3541 Points -4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	3540 Points -4%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3520 Points -5%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	3436 Points -7%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	3256 Points -12%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	3215 Points -13%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	3053 Points -18%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	2159 Points -42%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1926 Points -48%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	1216 Points -67%

3DMark Performance rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 Performance		11154 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		36240 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7198 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		3705 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, Intel Core i7-14700	24 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, Intel Core i7-14700	40 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	467 Seconds * -55%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	399 Seconds * -32%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (262 - 492, n=17)	351 Seconds * -16%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	346 Seconds * -15%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	335 Seconds * -11%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	324 Seconds * -7%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	315 Seconds * -4%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	314 Seconds * -4%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	302 Seconds *
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	269 Seconds * +11%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	268 Seconds * +11%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, Intel Core i7-14700	214 Seconds * +29%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Radeon 8060S, AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	132 Seconds * +56%
v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	278 Seconds * -64%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (147 - 396, n=5)	221 Seconds * -31%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	169 Seconds *
v4.3 Barbershop CPU
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	2741 Seconds * -83%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	1779 Seconds * -19%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	1698 Seconds * -13%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1355 - 1839, n=7)	1632 Seconds * -9%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	1557 Seconds * -4%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	1528 Seconds * -2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	1498 Seconds *
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1363 Seconds * +9%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	1355 Seconds * +10%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Radeon 8060S, AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	686 Seconds * +54%
v4.3 Barbershop oneAPI
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	914 Seconds * -36%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (588 - 1037, n=4)	807 Seconds * -20%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	672 Seconds *

* ... menor é melhor

Performance rating - Percent
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	100 pt
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	32.3 pt
GMK EVO-T1 ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	30.6 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	30.2 pt
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	30 pt
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	27.6 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	75.4 (62.9^min) fps +247%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	25.8 (21.9^min) fps +19%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	24.8 (21.5^min) fps +14%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	23.6 (19.9^min, 16.3^P1) fps +9%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	22.6 (18.8^min, 6.53^P1) fps +4%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	21.7 (18.6^min, 18^P1) fps

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	101.9 fps +303%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.6 fps +17%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	26.9 fps +6%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	26.7 fps +6%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	25.3 (21.5^min, 22.2^P0.1, 22.8^P1) fps 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	25.3 (23.1^min, 23.1^P0.1, 23.6^P1) fps

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	122 (4.68^min, 83.3^P1) fps +613%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	29.1 (7.19^min, 20.4^P1) fps +70%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.5 (6.6^min, 19.6^P1) fps +67%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	27.8 (3.22^min, 18.9^P1) fps +63%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	18.1 (7.49^min, 14.1^P1) fps +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	17.1 (9.05^min, 13.7^P1) fps

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	113.6 fps +318%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	31.7 fps +17%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	30.5 fps +12%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	30.1 fps +11%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	27.6 fps +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	27.2 fps

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	189.9 (54^min, 145.8^P1) fps +275%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	53.4 (33.1^min, 40.4^P1) fps +5%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	51.2 (27.3^min, 41.1^P1) fps +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	50.7 (38.7^min, 41^P1) fps
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	49.5 (33.1^min, 38.6^P1) fps -2%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	164.8 (140.8^min) fps +112%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	88.1 (78.3^min) fps +13%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	81.5 (71.5^min) fps +5%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	81.4 (52.3^min) fps +4%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	78.1 (66.9^min) fps 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	77.9 (46.9^min) fps

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	127.8 fps +261%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	42.9 fps +21%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	41.4 fps +17%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	38 fps +7%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	37 fps +5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	35.4 fps

F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	270 (213^min, 163^P1) fps +242%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	86.4 (75^min, 67^P1) fps +10%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	85.4 (65^min, 63^P1) fps +8%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	85.3 (65^min, 62^P1) fps +8%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	83.6 (64^min, 53^P1) fps +6%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	83.4 (63^min, 42^P1) fps +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	78.9 (67^min, 65^P1) fps
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (53.5 - 86.5, n=12)	76.6 fps -3%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	72 (52^min, 30^P1) fps -9%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	66.2 (56^min, 54^P1) fps -16%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	40.4 (34^min, 33^P1) fps -49%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.7 (21^min, 17^P1) fps -67%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	250 (214^min, 158^P1) fps +243%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	79 (69^min, 63^P1) fps +9%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	75.6 (53^min, 50^P1) fps +4%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	74.8 (54^min, 43^P1) fps +3%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	74.5 (52^min, 49^P1) fps +2%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	73.3 (48^min, 47^P1) fps +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	72.8 (63^min, 61^P1) fps
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (47.4 - 79, n=12)	69.8 fps -4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	57.6 (47^min, 46^P1) fps -21%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	35.4 (30^min, 29^P1) fps -51%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	23.8 (19^min, 16^P1) fps -67%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	191.2 (166^min, 124^P1) fps +255%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	59.6 (53^min, 51^P1) fps +11%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	56.2 (38^min, 31^P1) fps +4%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	55.8 (41^min, 40^P1) fps +4%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	55.4 (38^min, 30^P1) fps +3%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	54.2 (37^min, 43^P1) fps +1%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (37.5 - 59.6, n=11)	54.1 fps +1%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	53.8 (38^min, 22^P1) fps 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	53.8 (46^min, 46^P1) fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	43.4 (34^min, 35^P1) fps -19%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.6 (22^min, 21^P1) fps -52%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18 (14^min, 12^P1) fps -67%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	58.5 (42^min, 28^P1) fps +242%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	20.4 (17^min, 16^P1) fps +19%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	19.5 (16^min, 16^P1) fps +14%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (16.4 - 19.9, n=9)	18.3 fps +7%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	17.1 (14^min, 14^P1) fps
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	16.6 (10^min, 7^P1) fps -3%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.8 (10^min, 10^P1) fps -13%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	13.9 (4^min, 7^P1) fps -19%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	13.6 (8^min, 8^P1) fps -20%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	13 (5^min, 9^P1) fps -24%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	12.3 (1^min, 3^P1) fps -28%

Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:SM
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	138.8 (29.8^min, 89.1^P0.1, 97.3^P1) fps +284%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	137.4 fps +281%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	48.7 (36^min, 36.2^P0.1, 43.4^P1) fps +35%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	44.1 fps +22%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	42.4 (27.8^min, 28^P0.1, 34.4^P1) fps +17%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	40.8 fps +13%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	39.9 fps +11%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	39.8 (32.3^min, 33^P0.1, 34.1^P1) fps +10%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (25.6 - 42.4, n=16)	36.7 fps +2%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	36.1 fps 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	36.1 (32.2^min, 32.3^P0.1, 33.8^P1) fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	33.5 (20.9^min, 21^P0.1, 23.4^P1) fps -7%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18 (5.95^min, 5.96^P0.1, 6.91^P1) fps -50%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	12.9 fps -64%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	117.4 fps +293%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	114.8 (60.2^min, 74.7^P0.1, 89.4^P1) fps +284%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	37.8 (31^min, 31.4^P0.1, 34.6^P1) fps +26%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	36.5 fps +22%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	33.5 fps +12%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	33.4 (23^min, 24.1^P0.1, 30.7^P1) fps +12%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	32.9 fps +10%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	30.5 (25.8^min, 26^P0.1, 27^P1) fps +2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	29.9 (27.2^min, 27.3^P0.1, 27.7^P1) fps
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	29.5 fps -1%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (20.3 - 33.3, n=16)	29 fps -3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	25.9 (5.81^min, 8.8^P0.1, 15.9^P1) fps -13%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14 (4.57^min, 4.59^P0.1, 5.02^P1) fps -53%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.7 fps -64%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	103.4 fps +302%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	101.4 (13.6^min, 61.8^P0.1, 83.5^P1) fps +295%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	31.6 (24.8^min, 24.8^P0.1, 27.5^P1) fps +23%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	30.6 fps +19%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	29 fps +13%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 fps +5%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	27 fps +5%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	26.6 (15.7^min, 15.8^P0.1, 16.8^P1) fps +4%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	26.1 (22.3^min, 22.3^P0.1, 23.4^P1) fps +2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	25.7 (23.3^min, 23.5^P0.1, 23.8^P1) fps
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (17.6 - 28.3, n=16)	25 fps -3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	22.4 (14^min, 14.2^P0.1, 15.3^P1) fps -13%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	11.7 (3.43^min, 3.51^P0.1, 3.99^P1) fps -54%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	9.2 fps -64%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	101.9 fps +303%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	98.6 (61.2^min, 74.7^P0.1, 81.5^P1) fps +290%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.6 fps +17%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	26.9 fps +6%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	26.7 fps +6%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	26.7 fps +6%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	26.2 (15.8^min, 15.9^P0.1, 16.4^P1) fps +4%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	25.3 (21.5^min, 22.2^P0.1, 22.8^P1) fps 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	25.3 (23.1^min, 23.1^P0.1, 23.6^P1) fps
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (17.2 - 27.8, n=17)	24.3 fps -4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	21.5 (13.6^min, 13.7^P0.1, 14.1^P1) fps -15%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	19.7 (15.9^min, 16^P0.1, 16.3^P1) fps -22%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	11.2 (3.28^min, 3.43^P0.1, 4.16^P1) fps -56%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	9.2 fps -64%

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off)
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	169.6 (133.7^min) fps +221%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	148.5 (125.5^min) fps +181%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	84.9 (70.7^min, 67.3^P1) fps +60%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	77.9 (64.8^min) fps +47%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	73.6 (61^min, 58^P1) fps +39%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	72.2 (60.8^min, 57.6^P1) fps +36%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	62.5 (32.9^min, 26.7^P1) fps +18%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	57.2 (48.1^min) fps +8%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	52.9 (45.1^min, 43.5^P1) fps
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (27.5 - 57.2, n=9)	48.1 fps -9%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	46.3 (39.2^min) fps -12%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31.3 (24.7^min) fps -41%
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	134.7 (114.5^min) fps +299%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	133.9 (108.2^min) fps +296%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	51.4 (43.9^min, 41.5^P1) fps +52%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	46.3 (39.5^min) fps +37%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	44.5 (37.8^min, 36.5^P1) fps +32%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	43.6 (37.4^min, 36.1^P1) fps +29%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	43.5 (37.6^min, 35.5^P1) fps +29%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	38.8 (34.1^min) fps +15%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (24.8 - 42.3, n=16)	36.3 fps +7%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	33.9 (19.2^min, 16.7^P1) fps 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	33.8 (29.3^min, 28.4^P1) fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	30.1 (25.8^min) fps -11%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18.2 (14.7^min) fps -46%
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	119 (97.6^min) fps +346%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	106 (92.2^min) fps +297%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	40.2 (34.9^min, 33.1^P1) fps +51%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	36.3 (31.7^min) fps +36%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	34.3 (30.1^min, 28.2^P1) fps +28%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	33.9 (29.5^min, 20.2^P1) fps +27%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	33.4 (28.9^min, 16.5^P1) fps +25%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	31.4 (27.4^min) fps +18%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (21.8 - 35.1, n=14)	30 fps +12%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	26.7 (23.2^min, 22.4^P1) fps
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	26.6 (15.5^min, 13.9^P1) fps 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	25.2 (22.3^min) fps -6%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.7 (12.5^min) fps -45%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	97.9 (80.3^min) fps +311%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	89.5 (77.5^min) fps +276%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	29.4 (21.6^min, 18^P1) fps +24%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.2 (25.2^min) fps +23%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 (23.1^min, 20.3^P1) fps +14%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	26.7 (23.2^min) fps +12%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	26.5 (22.1^min, 14.5^P1) fps +11%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	26.4 (22.9^min, 7.08^P1) fps +11%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (17 - 30, n=15)	25.6 fps +8%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	23.8 (20.3^min, 19.7^P1) fps
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	23.2 (12.6^min, 11.3^P1) fps -3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	21.7 (18.8^min) fps -9%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	12.8 (10.9^min) fps -46%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	87.3 (70^min) fps +302%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	75.4 (62.9^min) fps +247%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	25.8 (21.9^min) fps +19%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	24.8 (21.5^min) fps +14%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	23.6 (19.9^min, 16.3^P1) fps +9%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (15.4 - 27.3, n=17)	23.1 fps +6%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	22.6 (18.8^min, 6.53^P1) fps +4%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	21.8 (14.4^min, 12.2^P1) fps 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	21.7 (18.6^min, 18^P1) fps
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	21.5 (15.5^min, 12.7^P1) fps -1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	19.6 (16.7^min) fps -10%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	19.4 (11^min, 10.1^P1) fps -11%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	11.5 (9.81^min) fps -47%

Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	180.4 (154^min) fps +118%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	166 (142.2^min) fps +101%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	98.4 (87.5^min) fps +19%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	95.6 (85^min) fps +16%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	93.2 (82^min) fps +13%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	93 (82.4^min) fps +13%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	90 (79^min) fps +9%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	84.8 (52.1^min) fps +3%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	82.6 (47.5^min) fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	75.9 (45.7^min) fps -8%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (49.7 - 91.1, n=18)	71.5 fps -13%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	65.5 (56.1^min) fps -21%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	59.9 (22.6^min) fps -27%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	46.1 (32.6^min) fps -44%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	164.8 (140.8^min) fps +112%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	144.5 (122.7^min) fps +85%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	89.7 (77.1^min) fps +15%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	88.1 (78.3^min) fps +13%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	82.8 (72^min) fps +6%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	81.5 (71.5^min) fps +5%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	81.4 (52.3^min) fps +4%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	78.1 (66.9^min) fps 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	77.9 (46.9^min) fps
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (51.5 - 94.9, n=18)	75.2 fps -3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	72.9 (47.2^min) fps -6%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	65.8 (32.9^min) fps -16%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	58.6 (51.6^min) fps -25%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	44 (33.4^min) fps -44%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	223 fps +201%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	198.3 fps +167%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	84.9 fps +14%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	83.8 fps +13%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	81.8 fps +10%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	78.4 fps +6%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (47 - 95.1, n=17)	76.7 fps +3%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	74.2 fps
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	72.7 fps -2%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	71.3 fps -4%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	71.2 fps -4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	60.6 fps -18%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	45.1 fps -39%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	30.2 fps -59%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	157.7 fps +305%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	126.2 fps +224%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	44.3 fps +14%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (25.4 - 47.9, n=17)	42.4 fps +9%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	42.3 fps +9%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	41.5 fps +7%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	39.1 fps +1%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	39.1 fps +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	38.9 fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	35.4 fps -9%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	34.3 fps -12%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	33.4 fps -14%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.3 fps -35%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.9 fps -62%
1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	113.6 fps +318%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	94.7 fps +248%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	31.7 fps +17%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	30.5 fps +12%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	30.1 fps +11%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (19.5 - 33.1, n=17)	29 fps +7%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	28.7 fps +6%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	27.6 fps +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	27.2 fps
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	25.8 fps -5%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	25.3 fps -7%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	24.1 fps -11%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18.2 fps -33%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.7 fps -61%

GTA V
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	184.7 (2.08^min, 142.9^P1) fps +38%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	181.9 (3.06^min, 125^P1) fps +36%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	151.4 (4.93^min, 100^P1) fps +13%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	145 (4.16^min, 58.8^P1) fps +9%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	133.4 (6.17^min, 90.9^P1) fps
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	133.2 (8.14^min, 83.3^P1) fps 0%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	131.5 (23^min, 83.3^P1) fps -1%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	131 (24.6^min, 83.3^P1) fps -2%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	130 (26^min, 83.3^P1) fps -3%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	127.5 (23^min, 76.9^P1) fps -4%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (111.1 - 137.8, n=9)	123.3 fps -8%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	117.6 (36.7^min, 83.3^P1) fps -12%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	78.7 (14^min, 43.5^P1) fps -41%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	40.6 (15^min, 20^P1) fps -70%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	182.5 (2.13^min, 125^P1) fps +346%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	173.6 (4.5^min, 125^P1) fps +324%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	76 (9.03^min, 52.6^P1) fps +86%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	69.4 (11.3^min, 47.6^P1) fps +70%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	69.4 (9.45^min, 47.6^P1) fps +70%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	65.3 (8.95^min, 45.5^P1) fps +60%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	65 (10.7^min, 45.5^P1) fps +59%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	63.6 (8.99^min, 25.6^P1) fps +56%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	44.2 (13.2^min, 33.3^P1) fps +8%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	40.9 (6.4^min, 33.3^P1) fps
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (25.5 - 46.9, n=15)	40.3 fps -1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	39.9 (3.1^min, 29.4^P1) fps -2%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	22 (6.3^min, 16.4^P1) fps -46%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	11.7 (5.5^min, 7.25^P1) fps -71%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	122 (4.68^min, 83.3^P1) fps +613%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	99.8 (9.41^min, 71.4^P1) fps +484%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	31.4 (5.99^min, 22.7^P1) fps +84%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	29.1 (7.19^min, 20.4^P1) fps +70%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.5 (6.6^min, 19.6^P1) fps +67%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.1 (3.37^min, 19.2^P1) fps +64%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	27.8 (3.22^min, 18.9^P1) fps +63%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	26.6 (9.34^min, 11.4^P1) fps +56%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	18.1 (7.49^min, 14.1^P1) fps +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	17.1 (9.05^min, 13.7^P1) fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	16.6 (2.85^min, 11.4^P1) fps -3%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (10.4 - 18.1, n=16)	16.5 fps -4%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	9.07 (3.84^min, 7.35^P1) fps -47%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	4.79 (3.09^min, 3.5^P1) fps -72%

Strange Brigade
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	265 (170.8^min, 230^P1) fps +263%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (36 - 92.1, n=13)	78 fps +7%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	75.2 (60.2^min, 63^P1) fps +3%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	73.7 (60.8^min, 62.9^P1) fps +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	73.1 (60.1^min, 63.9^P1) fps
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	71.8 (20.2^min, 27^P1) fps -2%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	70.4 (17.6^min, 61.6^P1) fps -4%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	67.8 (55.4^min, 59.2^P1) fps -7%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	67.1 (46.5^min, 58.3^P1) fps -8%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	42.5 (5.6^min, 23.9^P1) fps -42%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	23.4 (8.3^min, 10.4^P1) fps -68%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	229 (19.8^min, 166.6^P1) fps +276%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	214 (123.6^min, 163.3^P1) fps +251%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (32.1 - 76.5, n=13)	65.4 fps +7%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	63.6 (45.3^min, 48.8^P1) fps +4%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	62.6 (43.8^min, 48.8^P1) fps +3%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	60.9 (45.8^min, 48.3^P1) fps
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	59.7 (25.1^min, 46.7^P1) fps -2%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	59.7 (18.9^min, 25.9^P1) fps -2%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	56.9 (38.4^min, 44.9^P1) fps -7%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	56.5 (42.4^min, 43.8^P1) fps -7%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	33.8 (7^min, 18.3^P1) fps -44%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	20.1 (5^min, 7.35^P1) fps -67%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	196.8 (14.6^min, 143.5^P1) fps +288%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	189.9 (54^min, 145.8^P1) fps +275%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	57.3 (18^min, 27.8^P1) fps +13%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	54.2 (39^min, 42.8^P1) fps +7%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (30.8 - 63.1, n=14)	53.9 fps +6%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	53.4 (33.1^min, 40.4^P1) fps +5%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	51.2 (27.3^min, 41.1^P1) fps +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	50.7 (38.7^min, 41^P1) fps
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	49.5 (33.1^min, 38.6^P1) fps -2%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	48.7 (35^min, 38.6^P1) fps -4%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	26.9 (5.4^min, 7.47^P1) fps -47%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17 (5^min, 5^P1) fps -66%

X-Plane 11.11
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	187.6 fps +240%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	125 fps +126%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	66.1 fps +20%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	64.5 fps +17%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	63.5 fps +15%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	61.1 fps +11%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	60.3 fps +9%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (51.5 - 73.4, n=18)	58.4 fps +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	55.2 fps
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	51.8 fps -6%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	47.5 fps -14%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	161.1 fps +311%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	85.8 fps +119%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	53.1 fps +35%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49.1 fps +25%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (39.2 - 57.7, n=18)	47.2 fps +20%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	45.7 fps +17%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	45.3 fps +16%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	44.5 fps +14%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	41.7 fps +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	39.2 fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	38.5 fps -2%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	127.8 fps +261%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	69 fps +95%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	42.9 fps +21%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	41.4 fps +17%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	39.6 fps +12%
Média Intel Arc Graphics 140T (33.2 - 49.2, n=18)	39.1 fps +10%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	38 fps +7%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	37 fps +5%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	36 fps +2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	35.4 fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	32.9 fps -7%

Gráfico de ultra FPS do Cyberpunk 2077

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T: Ø21.6 (20.8-21.9)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
GTA V (2015)	178.3	169.3	40.9	17.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	109.7	100.4	82.6	77.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	74.2	38.9	27.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	55.2	39.2	35.4
Strange Brigade (2018)	178.7	73.1	60.9	50.7
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	36.1	29.9	25.7	25.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)	33.8	26.7	23.8	21.7
F1 24 (2024)	78.9	72.8	53.8	17.1

Emissões

Ruído do sistema

O ruído do ventilador atinge o máximo na faixa de 30 dB(A) ao executar cargas exigentes, incluindo jogos, para ser mais silencioso do que muitos outros mini PCs equipados com CPUs da série H. No entanto, lembre-se de que isso pode facilmente se aproximar da faixa de 40 dB(A) ao configurar o sistema para o modo Performance via BIOS.

Perfil de ruído do ventilador (Branco: Fundo, vermelho: Sistema inativo, Azul: 3DMark 06, Laranja: Cyberpunk 2077, Verde: Prime95+FurMark stress)

Barulho

Ocioso		27.9 / 27.9 / 30.2 dB
Carga		31.3 / 32.5 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) ruído ambiente: 22.4 dB(A)

	Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	Beelink SER9 Pro Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	GMK EVO-T1 Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	BOSGAME M2 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060
Noise		-6%	-25%	-43%	-19%	-18%
desligado / ambiente * (dB)	22.4	23 -3%	23.5 -5%	24.7 -10%	23 -3%	23.9 -7%
Idle Minimum * (dB)	27.9	29.1 -4%	35.4 -27%	38.7 -39%	31.5 -13%	28.2 -1%
Idle Average * (dB)	27.9	30.1 -8%	35.4 -27%	38.8 -39%	32.3 -16%	28.2 -1%
Idle Maximum * (dB)	30.2	31.7 -5%	39 -29%	38.9 -29%	34.9 -16%	32.5 -8%
Load Average * (dB)	31.3	33.7 -8%	42.4 -35%	51.6 -65%	39 -25%	32 -2%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)	32.1	33.8 -5%	40.4 -26%	52 -62%	40.3 -26%	48.4 -51%
Load Maximum * (dB)	32.5	35.2 -8%	41.4 -27%	51.6 -59%	42.5 -31%	50.9 -57%
Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)				38.7

* ... menor é melhor

Temperatura

Teste de estresse

A CPU se estabilizaria em 2,5 GHz, 68 °C e 54 W ao executar o estresse do Prime95 no modo Balanced, em comparação com 3,4 GHz, 84 °C e 76 W no GMK EVO-T1 quando definido no modo Performance.

	Clock médio da CPU (GHz)	Clock da GPU (MHz)	Temperatura média da CPU (°C)
Sistema ocioso	--	--	55
Estresse do Prime95	2.5	--	68
Prime95 + FurMark Stress	2.3	850	68
Cyberpunk 2077 Stress	1.0	1700 - 2350	63

Alto-falantes

Os alto-falantes integrados funcionam bem com os quatro microfones integrados para ações habilitadas para voz. Enquanto outros mini PCs podem vir com apenas um microfone ou nenhum, ter ambos torna o Beelink mais acessível para Co-Pilot, ChatGPT, Alexa e outros softwares habilitados para voz.

Infelizmente, os alto-falantes atingem o máximo em torno de 75 dB(A), o que é bom para quartos, mas não é tão silencioso para salas de estar ou salas de conferência onde o ruído ambiente é comum. Por exemplo, nossa unidade de teste não teve problemas para captar nossos comandos de voz para a Alexa, mas os alto-falantes não têm potência durante a reprodução. Os alto-falantes do HP OmniBook 5 14por exemplo, chegam a quase 93 dB(A) em comparação.

O ruído rosa mostra que o volume máximo poderia ter sido mais alto, com apenas 75 dB(A)

Diagrama de frequência (as caixas de seleção podem ser marcadas e desmarcadas para comparar dispositivos)

Beelink GTI15 Ultra análise de áudio

(±) | o volume do alto-falante é médio, mas bom (###valor### dB)
Graves 100 - 315Hz
(±) | graves reduzidos - em média 14.6% menor que a mediana
(-) | graves não são lineares (15.9% delta para frequência anterior)
Médios 400 - 2.000 Hz
(±) | médios mais altos - em média 7% maior que a mediana
(±) | a linearidade dos médios é média (7.9% delta para frequência anterior)
Altos 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | agudos equilibrados - apenas 2.6% longe da mediana
(±) | a linearidade dos máximos é média (7.7% delta para frequência anterior)
Geral 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | a linearidade do som geral é média (21.3% diferença em relação à mediana)
Comparado com a mesma classe
» 44% de todos os dispositivos testados nesta classe foram melhores, 16% semelhantes, 40% piores
» O melhor teve um delta de 13%, a média foi 25%, o pior foi 64%
Comparado com todos os dispositivos testados
» 58% de todos os dispositivos testados foram melhores, 7% semelhantes, 34% piores
» O melhor teve um delta de 4%, a média foi 24%, o pior foi 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro análise de áudio

(+) | os alto-falantes podem tocar relativamente alto (###valor### dB)
Graves 100 - 315Hz
(+) | bons graves - apenas 3.8% longe da mediana
(+) | o baixo é linear (5.2% delta para a frequência anterior)
Médios 400 - 2.000 Hz
(+) | médios equilibrados - apenas 1.3% longe da mediana
(+) | médios são lineares (2.1% delta para frequência anterior)
Altos 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | agudos equilibrados - apenas 1.9% longe da mediana
(+) | os máximos são lineares (2.7% delta da frequência anterior)
Geral 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | o som geral é linear (4.6% diferença em relação à mediana)
Comparado com a mesma classe
» 0% de todos os dispositivos testados nesta classe foram melhores, 0% semelhantes, 100% piores
» O melhor teve um delta de 5%, a média foi 17%, o pior foi 45%
Comparado com todos os dispositivos testados
» 0% de todos os dispositivos testados foram melhores, 0% semelhantes, 100% piores
» O melhor teve um delta de 4%, a média foi 24%, o pior foi 134%

Gerenciamento de energia

Consumo de energia

O consumo é excepcionalmente alto quando ocioso na área de trabalho, mesmo depois de verificar se há atividade em segundo plano ou programas furtivos. A alta taxa ocorre até mesmo no modo de suspensão, o que sugere um possível erro no estado de energia da CPU. De outra forma, está onde esperamos que esteja ao executar cargas mais exigentes. O sistema é menos exigente do que o GMK NucBox K12 com tecnologia AMD, ao mesmo tempo em que oferece um desempenho ligeiramente mais rápido para um melhor desempenho por watt.

O consumo aumentaria para 84 W ao iniciar o estresse do Prime95

Prime95+FurMark estresse iniciado aos 10s

Consumo de energia

desligado	4.4 / 32.9 Watt
Ocioso	18.8 / 20.1 / 40.1 Watt
Carga	66.2 / 82.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T, , , x,	Beelink SER9 Pro Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x,	GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x,	GMK EVO-T1 Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x,	BOSGAME M2 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0, , x,	Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060, , , x,
Power Consumption		34%	21%	28%	27%	-127%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	18.8	7 63%	9.9 47%	6.1 68%	6.4 66%	26.5 -41%
Idle Average * (Watt)	20.1	7.1 65%	10.1 50%	7.9 61%	7.3 64%	33.2 -65%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	40.1	7.5 81%	13.1 67%	13.2 67%	7.5 81%	33.9 15%
Load Average * (Watt)	66.2	62.3 6%	69.8 -5%	60.7 8%	75 -13%	127.6 -93%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)	72.4	80.1 -11%	86.3 -19%	67.4 7%	83 -15%	291 -302%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	82.4	82.9 -1%	92.8 -13%	117.1 -42%	99.9 -21%	307.8 -274%

* ... menor é melhor

Consumo de energia Cyberpunk / Teste de estresse

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T: Ø83.1 (81.8-83.7)

GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M: Ø91.4 (89.7-92.8)

Consumo de energia do monitor externo

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø82.9 (81.9-83.9)

GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø89 (87.7-90.4)

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø77.8 (74.2-78.5)

GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø81.4 (80.4-82.7)

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø76.7 (74.7-78.3)

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø61.7 (60.7-67.9)

GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø85.1 (80-87.5)

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø18.6 (17.4-20)

GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10 (9.29-14.6)

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø72.4 (71.2-73.8)

GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø86.3 (78.2-87.4)

Classificação do Notebookcheck

!CHANGE!

conclusão muito curta, máximo de 400 caracteres

De volta ao veredicto

Beelink GTI15 Ultra - 11/29/2025 v8
Allen Ngo

Acabamento

87 / 98 → 89%

Conectividade

70 / 81 → 87%

Peso

71%

Desempenho do jogos

51 / 80 → 64%

Desempenho da aplicação

89 / 92 → 97%

AI Performance

89%

Temperatura

96%

Ruído

87%

Áudio

64%

Médio

55%

84%

Mini PC - Médio equilibrado

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
32.9%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 24.2%

Concorrentes potenciais em comparação

Imagem	Modelo / Análises	Preço	Peso	Altura	Tela
1. 83.7%	Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 64 GB Memória	Amazon: $1,229.00 Preço de tabela: 1200 USD	1.3 kg	55.8 mm	x
2. 80.2%	Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memória, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: Preço de tabela: 520 USD	812 g	44.7 mm	x
3. 73.7%	GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memória, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: $749.99	938 g	78 mm	x
4. 75.4%	GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 64 GB Memória, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: $1,299.99 Preço de tabela: 999€	946 g	73.6 mm	x
5. 79%	BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memória, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: Preço de tabela: 600 USD	819 g	51 mm	x
6. 76.9%	Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ⎘ 32 GB Memória	Amazon: 1. $779.00 Lenovo ThinKCentre neo 50q G... 2. $599.00 Lenovo ThinkCentre neo 50q G... 3. $649.99 Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo 30s G... Preço de tabela: 1600 USD	3.5 kg	108 mm	x

Mais artigos relacionados a este dispositivo

Beelink GTI15 Ultra (GTI Serie)

Análise

•

Análise do Ultra mini PC Beelink GTI13: Uma alternativa ao Mac Mini com Int...

Notícias

•

O dock de eGPU para mini PC da Beelink com slot PCIe de tamanho normal torn...

Análise

•

Análise do mini PC Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station: Mais econômico d...

Notícias

•

Beelink GTI 11 mini PC atinge a Intel NUC onde dói: Preço

Análise

•

Nossa principal alternativa Intel NUC 11: Revisão do mini PC Beelink GTI 11

Transparência

A seleção dos dispositivos a serem analisados é feita pela nossa equipe editorial. A amostra de teste foi fornecida ao autor como empréstimo pelo fabricante ou varejista para fins desta revisão. O credor não teve influência nesta revisão, nem o fabricante recebeu uma cópia desta revisão antes da publicação. Não houve obrigação de publicar esta revisão. Como empresa de mídia independente, a Notebookcheck não está sujeita à autoridade de fabricantes, varejistas ou editores.

É assim que o Notebookcheck está testando

Todos os anos, o Notebookcheck analisa de forma independente centenas de laptops e smartphones usando procedimentos padronizados para garantir que todos os resultados sejam comparáveis. Desenvolvemos continuamente nossos métodos de teste há cerca de 20 anos e definimos padrões da indústria no processo. Em nossos laboratórios de teste, equipamentos de medição de alta qualidade são utilizados por técnicos e editores experientes. Esses testes envolvem um processo de validação em vários estágios. Nosso complexo sistema de classificação é baseado em centenas de medições e benchmarks bem fundamentados, o que mantém a objetividade.

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5435 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 666018 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Análise do Beelink GTI15 Ultra: Um dos mini PCs mais completos para seu tamanho

Allen Ngo, 2025-11-30 (Update: 2025-11-30)

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core comparado com
Asus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min) N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	91
...
Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1024
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1027
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	1029
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	1031
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100,	1033
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T	1053
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, M3 Pro 18-Core GPU	1059
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 comparado com
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex-1570 81CA000RUS (min) i5-8550U, GeForce MX130	28
...
Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11139
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M	11140
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	11153
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	11154
Asus GL702VM-GC102D 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11159
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	11161
Dell XPS 13 9350 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V	11161
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max) R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 5090	82642