Notebookcheck Logo

Análise do XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24): Um laptop RTX 4070 compacto para gamers e criadores

Poderoso. O leve e compacto XMG Fusion 15 não apresenta um tamanho de tela convencional: Em vez de uma tela de 16 ou 15,6 polegadas, ele é equipado com um painel de 15,3 polegadas (2.560 x 1.600 pixels, 240 Hz) com uma proporção de 16:10. Um processador Core i9, RTX 4070, Thunderbolt 4 e tempos de execução muito bons completam o pacote total.

O XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) - um laptop de 15,3 polegadas para gamers e criadores - é baseado em um barebone (GM5IX7A) do fabricante Tongfang. Raptor Lake, Ada Lovelace e 32 GB de RAM equipam o laptop para streaming, renderização e jogos. A variante atual pode ser adquirida por cerca de US$ 2.500. Os concorrentes incluem dispositivos como o Aorus 16X (2024), Alienware m16 R2, HP Omen Transcend 16 e o Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9.

SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (XMG Fusion 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 170 W PL2 / Short Burst, 160 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 2175 MHz, Memoría: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.5222, Optimus + MUX-Switch
Memória
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Pantalha
15.30 polegadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 197 PPI, BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1, IPS, sRGB, Brilhante: não, 240 Hz, Adaptive Sync
placa mãe
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Disco rígido
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 894 GB livre
Placa de Som
Conexant SN6140
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Audiokombo, Card Reader: SD, SDXC, SDHC, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Motorcomm YT6801 (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 21.9 x 342.5 x 245
Bateria
99.8 Wh, 6450 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, USB Thundrive (drivers, manuals), stickers, mousepad, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.13 kg, Suprimento de energia: 864 g
Preço
2293 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possíveis concorrentes em comparação

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.9 %
05/2024
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg21.9 mm15.30"2560x1600
87.4 %
04/2024
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
90.2 %
03/2024
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg23.5 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
02/2024
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.3 %
04/2024
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.95 mm16.00"2560x1600

Estojo - O laptop XMG tem um estojo de alumínio

A Schenker optou por um gabinete de alumínio preto fosco e elegante com superfícies lisas. O laptop não apresenta nenhum elemento de design chamativo ou tiras de LED - apenas a luz de fundo do teclado (RGB) dá um pouco de cor ao dispositivo. O laptop dificilmente se destacaria em ambientes profissionais.

Não notamos nenhuma saliência de material e todos os espaços se alinham perfeitamente. A unidade de base e a tampa podem ser ligeiramente torcidas, mas isso não é nada fora do comum. Pressionar a parte de trás da tampa não resulta em nenhuma mudança de imagem. As dobradiças rígidas permitem um ângulo máximo de abertura de 180 graus. É possível abri-lo com uma mão.

XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)

Não é nenhuma surpresa: Dentro do campo de comparação, o Fusion é o dispositivo mais compacto - ele apresenta a menor tela. Ao mesmo tempo, ele também é o mais leve de todos.

Comparação de tamanho

363.4 mm 261.75 mm 26.95 mm 2.5 kg363.9 mm 249.4 mm 23.5 mm 2.5 kg356 mm 254 mm 20 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 269 mm 20 mm 2.3 kg342.5 mm 245 mm 21.9 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Conectividade - O Fusion 15 com Thunderbolt 4

O Fusion possui três portas USB-A (USB 3.2 Gen 1) e duas portas USB-C (1x USB 3.2 Gen 1, 1x Thunderbolt 4). A porta TB4 suporta Power Delivery e pode emitir um sinal DisplayPort. No total, o laptop tem duas saídas de vídeo (1x HDMI, 1x DP). Um conector de áudio e uma porta Gigabit Ethernet completam suas opções de conectividade. As saídas de vídeo e a conexão de energia estão localizadas na parte traseira do dispositivo. Os cabos correspondentes saem pela parte traseira, portanto não atrapalham o senhor.

Lado esquerdo: Slot para uma trava de cabo, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C), combinação de áudio
Lado esquerdo: Slot para uma trava de cabo, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C), combinação de áudio
Lado direito: Leitor de cartão SD, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
Lado direito: Leitor de cartão SD, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
Parte traseira: Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery), HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, conexão de energia
Parte traseira: Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery), HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, conexão de energia

Leitor de cartão SD

Com taxas de transferência de 81 MB/s (transferência de 250 imagens jpg, cada uma com 5 MB de tamanho) e 82 MB/s (cópia de grandes blocos de dados), o leitor de cartão SD (cartão de referência: AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) tem velocidade média. A concorrência oferece, em grande parte, leitores mais rápidos.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
186 MB/s +130%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=96, last 2 years)
98.3 MB/s +21%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
81 MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
75.3 MB/s -7%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
205.32 MB/s +150%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
188 MB/s +129%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=91, last 2 years)
121.5 MB/s +48%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
82 MB/s

Comunicação

O Fusion usa um chip WiFi 6E (Intel AX211) que, na melhor das hipóteses (sem dispositivos WiFi nas proximidades, curta distância entre o laptop e o servidor), atinge taxas de dados muito boas. As conexões com fio são feitas por um controlador Gigabit Ethernet (YT6801) da Motorcomm, um fabricante que nunca encontramos antes.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1444 (1378min - 1489max) MBit/s
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1411 (1327min - 1472max) MBit/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=149, last 2 years)
1264 MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1861, n=189)
1244 MBit/s -14%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202
1205 (875min - 1438max) MBit/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
636 (485min - 769max) MBit/s -56%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
469 (304min - 548max) MBit/s -68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1697 (849min - 1712max) MBit/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1632 (1454min - 1700max) MBit/s
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1577 (1237min - 1665max) MBit/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=155, last 2 years)
1397 MBit/s -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=189)
1394 MBit/s -15%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202
1227 (1074min - 1317max) MBit/s -25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1040 (739min - 1218max) MBit/s -36%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1631 (1454-1700)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1576 (1237-1665)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1227 (1074-1317)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1668 (849-1712)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1039 (739-1218)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1444 (1378-1489)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø469 (304-548)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1205 (875-1438)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (1327-1472)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø636 (485-769)

Webcam

Sua webcam (2,1 MP) é de qualidade média. Ela falha quando se trata de precisão de cores: Com um desvio de cerca de 9, o valor-alvo (DeltaE<3) não foi atingido. No entanto, ela é compatível com o Windows Hello. Além disso, ele é equipado com uma tampa mecânica.

ColorChecker
8.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24): 8.97 ∆E min: 2.36 - max: 15.16 ∆E

Acessórios

O laptop é fornecido com um pendrive USB (driver, manuais), adesivos e um mousepad.

Manutenção

Depois de remover todos os parafusos na parte inferior do dispositivo, a parte inferior do gabinete pode ser retirada com bastante facilidade - o senhor pode precisar apenas de um plectro ou de uma espátula plana para ajudar nisso. Em seguida, é possível acessar os bancos de RAM (ambos ocupados), SSD (PCIe 4, M.2-2280), segundo slot SSD (PCIe 4, M.2-2280), módulo WLAN, ventiladores, bateria do BIOS e a bateria do laptop.

Hardware XMG Fusion 15 (início de 2024)
Hardware XMG Fusion 15 (início de 2024)
Hardware XMG Fusion 15 (início de 2024)
Hardware XMG Fusion 15 (início de 2024)
Hardware XMG Fusion 15 (início de 2024)

Garantia

O dispositivo é coberto por uma garantia básica de dois anos, que inclui serviço de coleta e um serviço de reparo rápido de 6 meses (reparo em 48 horas). O senhor pode estender essa garantia para 36 meses mediante o pagamento de uma taxa.

Dispositivos de entrada - Luz de fundo RGB de uma tecla

Teclado

As teclas do teclado chiclet (retroiluminação RGB de quatro níveis) apresentam uma elevação média e um ponto de pressão claro. Sua resistência poderia ser um pouco mais nítida, mas isso é uma questão de gosto. O teclado cede um pouco ao digitar, mas não se mostrou incômodo durante nosso teste. Pontos positivos: As quatro teclas de seta não são apenas de tamanho normal, mas também estão separadas das outras teclas.

Touchpad

Um clickpad multitoque (aprox. 12,3 x 7,8 cm) substitui a necessidade de um mouse e sua superfície lisa facilita o deslizamento dos dedos. Ele apresenta uma elevação curta e um ponto de pressão claro.

Teclado XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Teclado XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)

Tela - Painel brilhante com cobertura sRGB

A Schenker equipou o Fusion com uma tela de 15,3 polegadas (2.560 x 1.600 pixels) com uma proporção de 16:10. O painel fosco de 240 Hz apresenta Adaptive Sync, sem cintilação de PWM, tempos de resposta curtos e excelente brilho. Não há telas alternativas disponíveis.

Matriz de subpixel
Matriz de subpixel
Não há sangramento visível da luz de fundo
Não há sangramento visível da luz de fundo
467
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 491 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 460 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 491 cd/m²
Contraste: 1045:1 (Preto: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.14
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
75% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
73.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.204
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 15.30
Aorus 16X 2024
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Alienware m16 R2
BOE NE16NYH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, 2560x1600, 16.00
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
BOE NE160QDM-NYC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display
-7%
-3%
22%
-5%
Display P3 Coverage
73.5
67.2
-9%
71
-3%
99.8
36%
69.3
-6%
sRGB Coverage
100
96.7
-3%
100
0%
100
0%
99.4
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
75
69.3
-8%
71.4
-5%
97
29%
70.1
-7%
Response Times
-27%
-41%
96%
-105%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
5 ?(2.3, 2.7)
7.5 ?(3.3, 4.2)
-50%
5.7 ?(2.6, 3.1)
-14%
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
96%
11.9 ?(5.5, 6.4)
-138%
Response Time Black / White *
5.2 ?(1.5, 3.7)
5.4 ?(1.5, 3.9)
-4%
8.7 ?(4.6, 4.1)
-67%
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
96%
8.9 ?(4.8, 4.1)
-71%
PWM Frequency
120 ?(100)
Screen
-1%
11%
182%
17%
Brightness middle
491
542
10%
345.8
-30%
390
-21%
384
-22%
Brightness
460
504
10%
337
-27%
392
-15%
366
-20%
Brightness Distribution
89
86
-3%
87
-2%
98
10%
91
2%
Black Level *
0.47
0.45
4%
0.3
36%
0.02
96%
0.35
26%
Contrast
1045
1204
15%
1153
10%
19500
1766%
1097
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.16
2.73
-26%
1.99
8%
1.94
10%
0.97
55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.44
5.29
-19%
3.52
21%
4.26
4%
3.57
20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.14
1.32
-16%
0.62
46%
4.21
-269%
0.77
32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.3
2.9
12%
2.1
36%
1.5
55%
1.5
55%
Gamma
2.204 100%
2.192 100%
2.32 95%
2.221 99%
2.24 98%
CCT
6286 103%
6173 105%
6369 102%
6395 102%
6709 97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-12% / -6%
-11% / 1%
100% / 135%
-31% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

O monitor já mostrou uma boa representação de cores logo que saiu da caixa: Com um desvio de cerca de 2,2, o valor-alvo (DeltaE < 3) foi atingido. A calibração do monitor reduz seu desvio para 1,14 e resulta em tons de cinza mais equilibrados. O painel é capaz de cobrir completamente o espaço de cores sRGB, mas não os espaços de cores AdobeRGB ou DCI P3. Isso não é diferente na maioria das telas de seus concorrentes.

CalMAN: Escala de cinza
CalMAN: Escala de cinza
CalMAN: Saturação de cor
CalMAN: Saturação de cor
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Escala de cinza (calibrada)
CalMAN: Escala de cinza (calibrada)
CalMAN: Saturação de cor (calibrada)
CalMAN: Saturação de cor (calibrada)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrado)
XMG Fusion 15 E24 vs sRGB
XMG Fusion 15 E24 vs sRGB
XMG Fusion 15 E24 vs AdobeRGB
XMG Fusion 15 E24 vs AdobeRGB
XMG Fusion 15 E24 vs DCI-P3
XMG Fusion 15 E24 vs DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.5 ms rise
↘ 3.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.3 ms rise
↘ 2.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17803 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

O painel IPS estável com ângulo de visão do dispositivo permanece legível de todos os ângulos. Ao ar livre, o senhor pode ler na tela, desde que o sol não esteja brilhando muito forte.

O Fusion do lado de fora.
O Fusion do lado de fora.
Os ângulos de visão do Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Os ângulos de visão do Fusion 15 (Early 24)

Desempenho - Raptor Lake e Ada Lovelace alimentam o laptop

O poderoso e compacto XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) é voltado para gamers e criadores. Raptor Lake e Ada Lovelace proporcionam o desempenho necessário. O laptop pode ser configurado individualmente na loja on-line Schenker. A variante atual custa cerca de US$ 2.500. Os modelos mais baratos custam a partir de aproximadamente US$ 1.700.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Informações do sistema Nvidia
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

Condições de teste

O laptop oferece três modos de desempenho específicos do fabricante (consulte a tabela), que podem ser alternados rapidamente por meio de um botão separado (próximo ao botão liga/desliga). Perfis individuais podem ser criados usando o software Control Center pré-instalado. Por exemplo, os limites de potência da CPU, o TGP da GPU e/ou os limites superiores de temperatura do dispositivo podem ser ajustados.

Os modos Enthusiast (benchmarks) e Balanced (testes de bateria) foram usados durante nosso teste. O modo GPU foi definido como Hybrid (= Optimus).

Entusiasta Overboost Balanceado
Limite de potência 1 (HWInfo) 160 watts 160 watts 160 watts
Limite de potência 2 (HWInfo) 170 watts 170 watts 170 watts
Ruído (Witcher 3) 51 dB(A) 53 dB(A) 39 dB(A)
Desempenho (Witcher 3) 128 fps 130 fps 14-128 fps
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle
Centro de controle

Subvoltagem

O processador pode ser operado com tensões mais baixas do que as previstas pelo fabricante (undervolting). Como resultado, o consumo de energia e as emissões de calor do dispositivo são reduzidos. Mas tenha cuidado: A redução excessiva da tensão pode levar a um sistema instável ou defeituoso. Nesse caso, as alterações devem ser revertidas - a subtensão deve ser realizada por sua própria conta e risco.

BIOS XMG Fusion 15
BIOS XMG Fusion 15
BIOS XMG Fusion 15
BIOS XMG Fusion 15

Processador

O Core i9-14900HX (Raptor Lake) com 24 núcleos de CPU (8P + 16E = 32 threads) atinge taxas de clock máximas de 5,8 GHz (P) e 4,1 GHz (E). A carga permanente de vários threads (CB15 Loop) resulta em taxas de clock estáveis - o nível depende do modo de energia selecionado.

OEnthusiast fornece valores de benchmark abaixo da média da CPU, enquanto o Overboost os eleva significativamente acima da média - isso se aplica principalmente ao desempenho multi-thread do laptop. Seu desempenho de thread único varia em um nível alto e muito semelhante ao usar os três perfis.

Mais informações sobre o Core i9 podem ser encontradas em nosso artigo de análiseAnálise da atualização do Intel Raptor Lake-HX - Core i9-14900HX com mais desempenho de núcleo único .

Multi-thread (conectado à rede elétrica)
Multi-thread (conectado à rede elétrica)
Single-thread (conectado à rede elétrica)
Single-thread (conectado à rede elétrica)

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0230460690920115013801610184020702300253027602990322034503680391041404370Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3246 (3155.57-3458.12)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3877 (3701.99-4280.82)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2777 (2743.86-2839.9)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2840 (2582.31-3904.72)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4230 (4151.1-4590.84)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX; Overboost: Ø4247 (4169.27-4354.93)
CB15 Loop (Entusiasta)
CB15 Loop (Entusiasta)
CB15 Loop (Overboost)
CB15 Loop (Overboost)
Loop CB15 (balanceado)
Loop CB15 (balanceado)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
87.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
83.3 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
82.4 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
82.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
75.2 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
71.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
61.7 pt
Alienware m16 R2 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60.2 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
30709 Points +33%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
29686 (26317.7min - 29686max) Points +28%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (20702 - 32996, n=23)
28967 Points +25%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27818 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
23124 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
20702 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=222, last 2 years)
19907 Points -14%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18419 (18019.3min - 18419.5max) Points -20%
Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
2211 Points +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2188 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2182 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2043 - 2235, n=23)
2175 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2122 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2043 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=220, last 2 years)
1824 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1749 Points -14%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
11673 Points +38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11319 Points +34%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8427 - 12419, n=23)
11018 Points +30%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10655 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8465 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8427 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=220, last 2 years)
7569 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7050 Points -17%
CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
844 Points +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
841 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
836 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (779 - 859, n=23)
833 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
812 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
779 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=220, last 2 years)
702 Points -10%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
674 Points -13%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4591 (4151.1min - 4590.84max) Points +33%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
4557 Points +32%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 4875, n=23)
4406 Points +27%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4280 Points +24%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3905 (2582.31min - 3904.72max) Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3458 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=225, last 2 years)
3142 Points -9%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2840 (2743.86min - 2839.9max) Points -18%
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
312 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
312 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (287 - 320, n=23)
309 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
299 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
298 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
287 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=224, last 2 years)
269 Points -6%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points -11%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=217, last 2 years)
197.5 Seconds * -43%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
164 Seconds * -19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
138 Seconds *
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
126 Seconds * +9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (102 - 164, n=23)
118.9 Seconds * +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
113 Seconds * +18%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
110 Seconds * +20%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
121665 MIPS +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
115585 MIPS +18%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (87555 - 127108, n=23)
112774 MIPS +15%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
106866 MIPS +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
97929 MIPS
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
88012 MIPS -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=219, last 2 years)
78599 MIPS -20%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
67581 MIPS -31%
7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7508 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
7409 MIPS -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7297 MIPS -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7142 MIPS -5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6206 - 7508, n=23)
7105 MIPS -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6776 MIPS -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=219, last 2 years)
6164 MIPS -18%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5037 MIPS -33%
Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
18126 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost)
18056 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (15849 - 18643, n=23)
17564 Points +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
17408 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
16196 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
16011 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 18590, n=79, last 2 years)
14210 Points -12%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
12670 Points -22%
Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
3081 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
3054 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost)
3032 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2800 - 3095, n=23)
2995 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
2889 Points -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
2800 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1599 - 3095, n=79, last 2 years)
2652 Points -14%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
2383 Points -23%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
21299 Points +24%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
20994 Points +22%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19607 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 21606, n=23)
19446 Points +13%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17612 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17214 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=224, last 2 years)
13863 Points -19%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12328 Points -28%
Single-Core
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2183 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
2152 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2107 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2210, n=23)
2102 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2053 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2046 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=224, last 2 years)
1819 Points -14%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1741 Points -17%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
32.4 fps +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.1 fps +25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (22.7 - 34.4, n=23)
29.6 fps +23%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
24 fps
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
22.7 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=220, last 2 years)
21.6 fps -10%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
21.2 fps -12%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
53.1 s * -37%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.3.4.2)
49.8 s * -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=216, last 2 years)
49.5 s * -27%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (33.9 - 85.1, n=23)
44.6 s * -15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
40.7 s * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
38.9 s *
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
38.5 s * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2, Overboost)
36.1 s * +7%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.487 sec * -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=219, last 2 years)
0.4685 sec * -28%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3955 sec * -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3917 sec * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3609 - 0.4225, n=23)
0.3818 sec * -5%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3782 sec * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
0.3684 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.365 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3458 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
276 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
287 Points
Ajuda
Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
99.4 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
89.6 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
68.6 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67.6 pt
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63.6 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
27412 KRay/s +36%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17244 - 29351, n=22)
25121 KRay/s +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
25072 KRay/s +24%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
23082 KRay/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
20224 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=215, last 2 years)
19200 KRay/s -5%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
18470 KRay/s -9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
17244 KRay/s -15%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
137215 Points +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
129169 Points +24%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (88537 - 148888, n=22)
125646 Points +20%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
116836 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
104545 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=215, last 2 years)
96286 Points -8%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
92996 Points -11%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
88537 Points -15%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
6905 MB/s +30%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
6285 MB/s +19%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (4267 - 7229, n=22)
6189 MB/s +17%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
5723 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
5293 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=215, last 2 years)
4422 MB/s -16%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
4267 MB/s -19%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
4242 MB/s -20%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
142503 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
139673 Points +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
139355 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148773, n=22)
138500 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
131076 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
118405 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=215, last 2 years)
110711 Points -16%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
84180 Points -36%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
15756 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
15401 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (12217 - 18256, n=22)
15333 Points +10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
14830 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13913 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=215, last 2 years)
12335 Points -11%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
12217 Points -12%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
10617 Points -24%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
68400 Points +34%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
62567 Points +22%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43302 - 72594, n=22)
61661 Points +21%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
57633 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
51088 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=215, last 2 years)
48960 Points -4%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
47685 Points -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
43302 Points -15%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
236096 MB/s +24%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
190740 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=22)
138443 MB/s -27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
120213 MB/s -37%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
112833 MB/s -41%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=215, last 2 years)
108576 MB/s -43%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
86964 MB/s -54%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
82757 MB/s -57%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
1957 MB/s +32%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1866 MB/s +26%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1265 - 2149, n=22)
1802 MB/s +21%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1662 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1485 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1265 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=215, last 2 years)
1231 MB/s -17%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1219 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
14882 KRay/s +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13776 KRay/s +25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (9170 - 16128, n=22)
13530 KRay/s +23%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
12355 KRay/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
11009 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=215, last 2 years)
10376 KRay/s -6%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
9802 KRay/s -11%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
9170 KRay/s -17%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49676 MPixel/s +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49507 MPixel/s +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49217 MPixel/s +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (33960 - 51118, n=22)
48315 MPixel/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
47721 MPixel/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
47411 MPixel/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
39532 MPixel/s -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=216, last 2 years)
37419 MPixel/s -21%

Desempenho do sistema

O sistema de funcionamento suave não deixa a desejar em termos de potência de computação. Os jogos, o streaming e a renderização não representam grandes desafios para o laptop. As taxas de transferência da RAM estão dentro de um nível normal para a RAM DDR5-5600. Os resultados do PCMark também foram bons.

A RAM é executada no modo de canal duplo.
A RAM é executada no modo de canal duplo.
PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8550 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8522 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
8389 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7866 - 8550, n=5)
8270 Points -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
7866 Points -8%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7761 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=191, last 2 years)
7615 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11815 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11286 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10621 - 11815, n=5)
11150 Points -6%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
11071 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=190, last 2 years)
10742 Points -9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10621 Points -10%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10330 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
11103 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10731 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9701 - 11103, n=5)
10388 Points -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10268 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10139 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=190, last 2 years)
9744 Points -9%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9422 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
14827 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12114 - 14827, n=5)
13282 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
13247 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
13036 Points -2%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13035 Points -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
12114 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=190, last 2 years)
11547 Points -13%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2312 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2002 - 2312, n=4)
2207 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2203 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2002 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=164, last 2 years)
1882 Points -15%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1762 Points -20%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2191 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2109 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1827 - 2191, n=4)
2075 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1827 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=164, last 2 years)
1790 Points -15%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1684 Points -20%
CrossMark / Creativity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2458 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2287 - 2458, n=4)
2389 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2358 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2287 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=164, last 2 years)
2052 Points -13%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1913 Points -19%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2259 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1769 - 2330, n=4)
2102 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2049 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1769 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=164, last 2 years)
1700 Points -17%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1576 Points -23%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
342 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
342 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (322 - 342, n=5)
336 Points -2%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
330 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
322 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=189, last 2 years)
300 Points -12%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
294 Points -14%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
301 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (291 - 301, n=3)
297 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
291 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (157.9 - 328, n=164, last 2 years)
263 Points -13%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
257 Points -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
546 ms * -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 824, n=202, last 2 years)
518 ms * -20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
449 ms * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (431 - 449, n=5)
439 ms * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 ms * -2%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
436 ms * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
431 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
8522 pontos
Ajuda
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78979 MB/s +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78854 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78330 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77669 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (56992 - 83392, n=22)
77573 MB/s 0%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63008 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=215, last 2 years)
60246 MB/s -22%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86538 MB/s +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86376 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85867 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85070 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (54443 - 87507, n=22)
84273 MB/s -2%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76370 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=215, last 2 years)
64332 MB/s -25%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77579 MB/s +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77406 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77346 MB/s +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (51387 - 78199, n=22)
74508 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72287 MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66009 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=215, last 2 years)
62379 MB/s -14%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.2 ns * -52%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=211, last 2 years)
88.6 ns * -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 ns * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (79.7 - 105, n=22)
84.1 ns * -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.4 ns * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.1 ns *
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.5 ns * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Latências de DPC

O teste padronizado do monitor de latência (navegação na Web, reprodução de vídeo 4k, alta carga do Prime95) revelou algumas anomalias. O sistema não parece ser adequado para edição de vídeo e áudio em tempo real. Futuras atualizações de software podem levar a melhorias ou até mesmo a deteriorações.

Monitor de latência
Monitor de latência
Monitor de latência
Monitor de latência
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2037.7 μs * -192%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1566 μs * -124%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
1162.9 μs * -66%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
989.1 μs * -42%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
698.6 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Dispositivos de armazenamento

O Fusion pode acomodar um total de dois SSDs PCIe-4 no formato M.2-2280. Há suporte para RAID-0/1. O SSD Samsung (1 TB) do nosso dispositivo de teste apresentou excelentes taxas de dados. Ponto positivo: Não notamos nenhum estrangulamento térmico.

O laptop pode acomodar dois SSDs PCIe-4.
O laptop pode acomodar dois SSDs PCIe-4.
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7119 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6895 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 790 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 550.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2954 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4529 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 65.05 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 281.6 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
89.8 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
 
83.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.4 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
78.3 pt
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
77.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
68.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
57.6 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4480 (4426.62min - 4479.73max) MB/s +23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4037 (3964.04min - 4036.7max) MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3645 (3579.03min - 3644.85max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=190, last 2 years)
3504 MB/s -4%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2809 - 4234, n=11)
3355 MB/s -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3102 (3080.64min - 3101.78max) MB/s -15%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2620 (2556.56min - 2619.76max) MB/s -28%
seq write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3637 - 5842, n=11)
4901 MB/s +13%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4757 (4720.06min - 4757.31max) MB/s +10%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4371 (4342.15min - 4371.09max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4342 (4320.81min - 4342.28max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4093 (4016.82min - 4092.8max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=190, last 2 years)
3759 MB/s -13%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3038 (2862.26min - 3038.15max) MB/s -30%
seq q8 t1 read
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (7011 - 7148, n=11)
7103 MB/s +1%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7079 (6575.14min - 7078.73max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7011 (6063.46min - 7010.81max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6636 (6205.02min - 6635.75max) MB/s -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
6388 (5544.27min - 6387.72max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2268 - 16089, n=190, last 2 years)
6293 MB/s -10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
5181 (4323.23min - 5181.35max) MB/s -26%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6897 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (6531 - 6897, n=11)
6775 MB/s -2%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5250 (5191.5min - 5250.22max) MB/s -24%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5234 (5167.11min - 5234.47max) MB/s -24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4949 (4932.28min - 4948.61max) MB/s -28%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4821 (4606.6min - 4820.72max) MB/s -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=190, last 2 years)
4733 MB/s -31%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
92.7 (91.49min - 92.68max) MB/s +29%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
83.5 (82.8min - 83.52max) MB/s +16%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (55.3 - 84.5, n=11)
74.7 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
71.8 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=190, last 2 years)
67.4 MB/s -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
51.3 (50.48min - 51.25max) MB/s -29%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
47.2 (45.9min - 47.16max) MB/s -34%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
340 (329.38min - 339.78max) MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
290 (278.05min - 290.22max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
251 (249.74min - 251.16max) MB/s -13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (146.3 - 343, n=11)
250 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=190, last 2 years)
223 MB/s -23%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
198.1 (195.9min - 198.06max) MB/s -32%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
128.1 (123.78min - 128.05max) MB/s -56%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4915 (4860.82min - 4914.87max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4055 (4044.11min - 4055.48max) MB/s -17%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3630 (3471.35min - 3629.9max) MB/s -26%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (818 - 4923, n=11)
3366 MB/s -32%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3302 (3194.22min - 3302.44max) MB/s -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=190, last 2 years)
2584 MB/s -47%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
900 (832.36min - 900.34max) MB/s -82%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3542 (3491.17min - 3541.69max) MB/s +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3443 (3007.99min - 3443.05max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3406 (3365.94min - 3405.88max) MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3003 (2991.33min - 3002.71max) MB/s -12%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (413 - 4683, n=11)
2709 MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=190, last 2 years)
2136 MB/s -37%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 (405.08min - 437.5max) MB/s -87%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9475 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
8778 Points -7%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (5405 - 10265, n=11)
8463 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8364 Points -12%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8059 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=178, last 2 years)
6804 Points -28%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5138 Points -46%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3530 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3233 Points -8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3152 Points -11%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1349 - 4721, n=11)
3049 Points -14%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3005 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=178, last 2 years)
2487 Points -30%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1458 Points -59%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4145 Points
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2308 - 4684, n=11)
4009 Points -3%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4006 Points -3%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3573 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3543 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=178, last 2 years)
3114 Points -25%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3029 Points -27%
Seq Read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5760.15 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5625.54 MB/s -2%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5592.15 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5355.36 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4362 - 5760, n=11)
5138 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=178, last 2 years)
4920 MB/s -15%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4161.31 MB/s -28%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5243.63 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3376 - 5609, n=11)
4780 MB/s -9%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4431.76 MB/s -15%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4431.18 MB/s -15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3950.35 MB/s -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=178, last 2 years)
3624 MB/s -31%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3587.95 MB/s -32%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
82.62 MB/s +29%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
71.52 MB/s +12%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (61.2 - 76.8, n=11)
70.4 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=178, last 2 years)
66.4 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
63.85 MB/s
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
61.86 MB/s -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
49.79 MB/s -22%
4K Write
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
283.44 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
242.28 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (181.9 - 306, n=11)
226 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
213.76 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=178, last 2 years)
210 MB/s -13%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
191.79 MB/s -21%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
179.15 MB/s -26%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2982.47 MB/s
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2673.76 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2615.17 MB/s -12%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (787 - 3164, n=11)
2383 MB/s -20%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2374.63 MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (442 - 3475, n=178, last 2 years)
1923 MB/s -36%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
845.48 MB/s -72%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3413.79 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1592 - 3975, n=11)
3317 MB/s -3%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3279.44 MB/s -4%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2951.09 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2933.74 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=178, last 2 years)
2544 MB/s -25%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2478.06 MB/s -27%
Access Time Read
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.088 ms * -76%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=177, last 2 years)
0.05449 ms * -9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.054 ms * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.05 ms *
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.047 ms * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.042 ms * +16%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.018 - 0.074, n=11)
0.03891 ms * +22%
Access Time Write
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.07 ms * -268%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.059 ms * -211%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=178, last 2 years)
0.04756 ms * -150%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.012 - 0.053, n=11)
0.02091 ms * -10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.02 ms * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.019 ms *
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.015 ms * +21%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6988 (6262.46-7033.01)
Aorus 16X 2024 Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5164 (4823.45-5192.86)
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7063 (6446.85-7107.46)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6318 (5640.08-6341.89)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5723 (3286.38-6614.84)

Placa de vídeo

Schenker permitiu que o laptop GeForce RTX 4070 do laptop um TGP máximo de 140 watts (115 watts + 25 watts de Dynamic Boost) - mais do que isso não é recomendado pela Nvidia. A GPU tem acesso a 8 GB de VRAM (GDDR6), o que é um pouco baixo para as demandas atuais. Os benchmarks apresentaram resultados acima da média da RTX-4070(Enthusiast) e o Overboost resultou apenas em uma pequena vantagem. A alternância entre a dGPU e o Optimus requer uma reinicialização.

Fire Strike (Entusiasta, conectado à rede elétrica)
Fire Strike (Entusiasta, conectado à rede elétrica)
Fire Strike (Entusiasta, modo de bateria)
Fire Strike (Entusiasta, modo de bateria)
Fire Strike (Overboost, conectado à rede elétrica)
Fire Strike (Overboost, conectado à rede elétrica)
Fire Strike (Balanceado, conectado à rede elétrica)
Fire Strike (Balanceado, conectado à rede elétrica)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
100 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
96.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
95.8 pt
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
94.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
90.1 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
89.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
88.3 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
85.3 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
46434 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
44902 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
43689 Points -3%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
42296 Points -6%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
41457 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=219, last 2 years)
40891 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=50)
40358 Points -10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
39424 Points -12%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
32533 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
31274 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
31105 Points -1%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
30932 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=224, last 2 years)
29717 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (16212 - 33451, n=50)
29284 Points -6%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
29156 Points -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
28461 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
13391 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13336 Points +5%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12997 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12682 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=221, last 2 years)
12168 Points -4%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12048 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (6241 - 13391, n=49)
11762 Points -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
11181 Points -12%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
63892 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
36008 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
26661 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
13067 pontos
Ajuda
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
23 Seconds * -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 142, n=182, last 2 years)
23 Seconds * -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 28, n=49)
21.4 Seconds * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
21 Seconds *
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3.3.3)
20 Seconds * +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
20 Seconds * +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost)
20 Seconds * +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
19 Seconds * +10%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=189, last 2 years)
39.1 Seconds * -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 142, n=52)
38.9 Seconds * -22%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
36 Seconds * -13%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3.3.3)
33 Seconds * -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
32 Seconds * -0%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
32 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
32 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost)
32 Seconds * -0%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=202, last 2 years)
314 Seconds * -29%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
298 Seconds * -23%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3.3.3)
296 Seconds * -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 428, n=49)
286 Seconds * -18%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
243 Seconds *
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
227 Seconds * +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
205 Seconds * +16%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost)
185 Seconds * +24%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
129366 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
128643 Points -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
126537 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 226512, n=223, last 2 years)
121838 Points -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
118601 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
112841 Points -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17391 - 129366, n=49)
112810 Points -13%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
111153 Points -14%
Vulkan Score
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
93143 Points +32%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
75575 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
70440 Points
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
65414 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
58476 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1952 - 160279, n=219, last 2 years)
43446 Points -38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (4898 - 93339, n=48)
41270 Points -41%
Geekbench 6.2
GPU OpenCL
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
129836 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost)
129433 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
120468 Points -7%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
120176 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4321 - 207373, n=79, last 2 years)
116832 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (101474 - 129836, n=26)
116734 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
115718 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
112875 Points -13%
GPU Vulkan
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost)
120033 Points +14%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
110951 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
105334 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
104883 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
90584 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (4286 - 196201, n=76, last 2 years)
73989 Points -29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9035 - 120033, n=24)
61467 Points -41%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=122, last 2 years)
2066 mpaths +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1868 mpaths +6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Overboost)
1854 mpaths +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1758 mpaths
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5.0.1)
1738 mpaths -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1737 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (171 - 1872, n=28)
1647 mpaths -6%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=126, last 2 years)
1480 mpaths +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1333 mpaths +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Overboost)
1325 mpaths +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1266 mpaths
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5.0.1)
1259 mpaths -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1256 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (120 - 1333, n=28)
1185 mpaths -6%
CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Overboost)
20388 mpaths +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
19077 mpaths +23%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
17465 mpaths +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
15556 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10005 - 20388, n=27)
14768 mpaths -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1690 - 26944, n=136, last 2 years)
13716 mpaths -12%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5.0.1)
12776 mpaths -18%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
675 mpaths +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07, Overboost)
635 mpaths +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=177, last 2 years)
615 mpaths +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (500 - 686, n=35)
605 mpaths 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
602 mpaths
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
596 mpaths -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
587 mpaths -2%
CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07, Overboost)
30730 ksamples +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
28791 ksamples +23%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
26677 ksamples +14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
23407 ksamples
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
21634 ksamples -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12638 - 35173, n=35)
21282 ksamples -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2741 - 37629, n=177, last 2 years)
19564 ksamples -16%

* ... smaller is better

Desempenho em jogos

O hardware foi projetado para jogos QHD em configurações altas ou máximas. Ao usar o DLSS 3 e o Frame Generation, o senhor pode jogar em resoluções mais altas e configurações máximas, incluindo ray tracing - mas somente com jogos compatíveis com essas funções. Observamos taxas de quadros acima da média da RTX-4070(Enthusiast) e o Overboost resultou em uma pequena vantagem.

Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
99.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
98 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95.9 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.8 pt
Alienware m16 R2 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
82.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
81.9 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
133.7 (126min) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
133 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
128 (110min) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
122 fps -5%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
121.3 (115min) fps -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=215, last 2 years)
118.4 fps -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.8 - 133.7, n=52)
111.9 fps -13%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
140.5 (9.33min, 90.9P1) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137.6 (8.45min, 90.9P1) fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
127.2 (5.17min, 83.3P1) fps -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.8 (21.8min, 83.3P1) fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (63.5 - 140.5, n=44)
112.6 fps -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=207, last 2 years)
108 fps -22%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
107.2 (4.31min, 71.4P1) fps -22%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost)
131.9 fps +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
131 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
124.6 fps
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
119.3 fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (66 - 131.9, n=47)
112.5 fps -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=217, last 2 years)
112.3 fps -10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
111.5 fps -11%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
108.3 fps -13%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
234 (27.8min, 175.8P1) fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost)
222 (29.4min, 167.7P1) fps +4%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
219 (38.5min, 163.7P1) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
214 (38.2min, 161.4P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=214, last 2 years)
210 fps -2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
204 (69.2min, 153P1) fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (117.7 - 234, n=47)
198.1 fps -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
194.2 (59.2min, 144.5P1) fps -9%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
187.5 (160.5min) fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
185.3 (161min) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
182.1 (158.8min) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
180.9 (156.5min) fps -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
154.1 (133.3min) fps -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (89.7 - 187.5, n=48)
150.8 fps -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=226, last 2 years)
144.1 fps -21%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
139.7 (120.9min) fps -23%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
138.4 fps +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137.6 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
136.9 fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.4 fps -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114.9 fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (72.2 - 144.4, n=50)
108.2 fps -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=232, last 2 years)
102.9 fps -25%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.8 fps -34%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost)
90.7 (67.4min) fps +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=47, last 2 years)
89.2 fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
87.1 (52.5min) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
87 (55.2min) fps
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
83.1 (28.4min) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (64.3 - 90.7, n=18)
82.6 fps -5%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
75.8 (32.9min) fps -13%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Gaming
  (32.9 - 103.9, n=38, last 2 years)
66.5 fps +26%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost)
55.6 (42.5min) fps +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
52.8 (33.2min) fps 0%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
52.7 (40.5min) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
52.6 (39.5min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (39.6 - 57.1, n=18)
51 fps -3%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
49.4 (29.5min) fps -6%
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.9 - 75.5, n=31, last 2 years)
49.3 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost)
46.8 (23.6min) fps +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
44.8 (15.7min) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
43.8 (34.3min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (40.9 - 46.8, n=11)
43.6 fps 0%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
42.4 (28.4min) fps -3%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
40.9 (21.5min) fps -7%
Dragon's Dogma 2
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80 (32.5min, 42.2P0.1, 60.3P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (65.7 - 80, n=2)
72.9 fps -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (49.5 - 80, n=3, last 2 years)
64.3 fps -20%
2560x1440 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
61.3 (37.3min, 38.9P0.1, 48.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (57.4 - 61.3, n=2)
59.4 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (34.6 - 61.3, n=2, last 2 years)
48 fps -22%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
128.5 fps +22%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
125.6 fps +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 208, n=26, last 2 years)
106.1 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105 (60.3min, 63.9P0.1, 89.7P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (71.3 - 128.5, n=13)
105 fps 0%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89.6 fps +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 155.2, n=19, last 2 years)
89 fps +8%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88.3 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.1 (30.4min, 49.4P0.1, 68.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (54.4 - 89.6, n=12)
74 fps -10%
Alone in the Dark
1920x1080 Cinematic Preset
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126 (31.5min, 37.7P0.1, 88.8P1) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
124.7 (21.3min, 36.4P0.1, 57.1P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (114 - 126, n=3)
121.6 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.6 - 176.4, n=4, last 2 years)
110.2 fps -13%
2560x1440 Cinematic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (64.7 - 91.6, n=3, last 2 years)
77.6 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76.6 (24.8min, 34.2P0.1, 53.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (64.7 - 76.6, n=3)
71.1 fps -7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64.7 (22.8min, 23.8P0.1, 30.9P1) fps -16%
Alan Wake 2
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70.1 (30.2min, 35.2P0.1, 41.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (65.1 - 70.1, n=4)
68.5 fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.1 - 121.1, n=17, last 2 years)
67.7 fps -3%
2560x1440 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (22.5 - 83.7, n=12, last 2 years)
59.9 fps +40%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
42.8 (10.4min, 22.7P0.1, 29.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (40.2 - 43.8, n=4)
42.3 fps -1%
The Witcher 3 v4.00
1920x1080 Ultra Preset / On AA:FX
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 150, n=17, last 2 years)
87.3 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 (7.86min, 52.7P0.1, 64.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (85 - 86.5, n=2)
85.8 fps -1%
1920x1080 RT Ultra Preset / On AA:FX
Average of class Gaming
  (12.9 - 66, n=11, last 2 years)
42.3 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
40.4 (8.77min, 13.8P0.1, 30.3P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (36 - 40.4, n=2)
38.2 fps -5%

Para testar se suas taxas de quadros permanecem estáveis por um longo período, deixamos o jogo The Witcher 3 rodar por cerca de 60 minutos em Full HD e com as configurações definidas no máximo. Não movemos o personagem do jogo. Não notamos um colapso na taxa de quadros, no entanto, eles caíram alguns por cento após cerca de 50 minutos(Enthusiast). Com o perfil Overboost ativado, esse comportamento não ocorreu.

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; FPS: Ø123.4 (111-129)
Aorus 16X 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; FPS: Ø118.6 (114-123)
Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø110 (97-116)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø113.2 (109-118)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø118.3 (114-125)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Overboost: Ø130.2 (125-135)
Witcher 3 (Entusiasta)
Witcher 3 (Entusiasta)
Witcher 3 (Overboost)
Witcher 3 (Overboost)
baixo média alto ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 187.8 187 186.4 137.6 98.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 603.3 418.4 246.2 128 92.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 234 207 196.5 182.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 226 175.5 124.6 90.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 205 173.3 136.9
Far Cry 5 (2018) 204 176 166 157 124
Strange Brigade (2018) 558 313 245 214 139.2
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) 271 215 176.2 86.5
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 157.2 121.2 106.1 105 82.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) 156.6 124.5 103.6 87 52.6
Alan Wake 2 (2023) 74.3 71.4 70.1 42.8
Alone in the Dark (2024) 222 209 196.5 126 76.6
Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) 83.9 80 61.3

Emissões - O laptop Schenker esquenta bastante

Emissões de ruído

No uso diário e em marcha lenta, o laptop funciona de forma muito silenciosa. Embora as ventoinhas estejam permanentemente ativadas (podem ser desativadas pelo BIOS), elas só podem ser ouvidas em ambientes muito silenciosos. Sob carga, as coisas mudam rapidamente: Observamos emissões nasais de até 53 dB(A)(Enthusiast). O modo Overboost resultou em valores ainda mais altos. O dispositivo funciona de forma consideravelmente mais silenciosa quando se usa o modo Balanced - aocusto de algum desempenho.

Barulho

Ocioso
27 / 28 / 33 dB
Carga
52 / 53 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.640.242.642.940.92534.736.639.140.936.73141.545.949.24645.5402729.331.532.932.15028.427.32825.227.96337.128.428.924.435.38044.725.218.817.543.810025.319.91916.826.112524.319.719.717.327.516027.622.419.918.429.620029.326.525.324.531.225030.325.521.419.431.231531.520.818.416.233.240034.921.217.613.135.850036.924.716.911.638.263038.923.516.711.339.480040.523.215.311.540.5100041.322.115.311.341.5125041.922.315.411.142.7160043.122.415.111.643.3200043.321.314.611.843.4250042.919.914.312.243.2315042.319.713.512.742.1400040.817.513.512.740.8500039.615.713.612.839.2630038.716.513.912.738.7800036.11613.813.236.11000033.416.91412.833.11250030.117.514.113.229.81600027.226.118.920.827.4SPL52.932.927.425.153.1N8.71.80.90.68.8median 36.9median 21.2median 15.3median 12.8median 38.2Delta5.82.52.22.45.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise
-5%
8%
5%
6%
off / environment *
25
26
-4%
24.7
1%
24
4%
23.9
4%
Idle Minimum *
27
26
4%
25.3
6%
29
-7%
24.3
10%
Idle Average *
28
32
-14%
25.3
10%
30
-7%
24.3
13%
Idle Maximum *
33
38
-15%
25.3
23%
31
6%
28.9
12%
Load Average *
52
54
-4%
31.7
39%
45
13%
45.8
12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
50
2%
53.8
-5%
44
14%
51
-0%
Load Maximum *
53
55
-4%
62
-17%
47
11%
56.6
-7%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatura

O teste de estresse e o Witcher 3 levaram o laptop a aquecer consideravelmente. Às vezes, ele atingia valores na faixa superior de 50 graus Celsius. No uso diário (escritório, Internet), os valores geralmente permanecem na zona verde.

 48 °C48 °C47 °C 
 43 °C44 °C42 °C 
 33 °C34 °C33 °C 
Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 41.3 °C
54 °C56 °C49 °C
50 °C51 °C41 °C
33 °C33 °C32 °C
Máximo: 56 °C
Médio: 44.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  44 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat
-5%
-14%
-6%
-8%
Maximum Upper Side *
48
41
15%
44.8
7%
49
-2%
43.8
9%
Maximum Bottom *
56
41
27%
48
14%
63
-13%
55.4
1%
Idle Upper Side *
28
37
-32%
37.2
-33%
30
-7%
32.8
-17%
Idle Bottom *
29
38
-31%
42
-45%
29
-0%
36
-24%

* ... smaller is better

Teste de estresse

O cenário extremo simulado pelo teste de estresse (Prime95 e Furmark em operação contínua) verifica a estabilidade do sistema sob carga total. O clock da CPU diminuiu lenta e continuamente de valores ligeiramente acima da taxa de clock base para valores abaixo dela. O núcleo gráfico funcionou em alta velocidade o tempo todo.

Furmark e Prime95
Furmark e Prime95
Furmark e Prime95
Furmark e Prime95
Furmark e Prime95
Furmark e Prime95
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

Alto-falantes

Os alto-falantes estéreo do laptop produzem um som decente, mas não têm graves. É possível obter uma experiência sonora melhor conectando fones de ouvido ou alto-falantes externos.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.9452540.939.5314650.94032.933.45025.232.86324.433.88017.527.410016.826.912517.339.916018.453.620024.564.525019.468.731516.268.440013.171.950011.68163011.380.480011.574100011.369.9125011.170.6160011.670.6200011.872.8250012.270315012.769.3400012.768.3500012.865.9630012.773.8800013.273.31000012.869.31250013.268.91600020.869.5SPL25.185.1N0.667median 12.8median 69.5Delta2.42.640.238.141.53751.448.536.534.544.244.429.432.924.739.221.449.129.258.225.563.323.564.621.26716.267.21470.614.377.615.777.812.574.711.770.211.666.911.970.512.369.312.872.913.370.814.176.813.770.91465.513.868.213.270.112.971.612.465.826.584.50.865.9median 13.8median 70.13.53.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)Aorus 16X 2024
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Aorus 16X 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gerenciamento de energia - O Fusion 15 oferece tempos de execução muito bons

Consumo de energia

Sua necessidade de energia é praticamente normal para o hardware instalado. Exceção: Apesar de uma bateria totalmente carregada, medimos um valor de consumo de energia de cerca de 20 watts com o laptop desligado. É provável que isso seja um bug. O teste Witcher 3 teste e o teste de estresse foram executados com valores de consumo de energia ligeiramente menores. A fonte de alimentação (280 watts) é suficiente em termos de potência.

Consumo de energia
Ociosodarkmidlight 8 / 14 / 26 Watt
Carga midlight 118 / 244 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-21%
-3%
-10%
-23%
Idle Minimum *
8
13
-63%
8.1
-1%
10
-25%
Idle Average *
14
18
-29%
13
7%
18
-29%
Idle Maximum *
26
35
-35%
40.3
-55%
32
-23%
Load Average *
118
138
-17%
79
33%
128
-8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
192.7
172.6
10%
188.1
2%
148.4
23%
Load Maximum *
244
222
9%
254.9
-4%
242
1%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø192.7 (182.8-220)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø195.5 (184.9-229)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø13.5 (8.11-25.8)

Power consumption with external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø111.6 (110.9-114.8)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø109.5 (108.4-112.6)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø167.2 (164.2-172.9)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø187.8 (163.3-206)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø20.1 (16.6-24.4)

Tempos de execução

Durante nosso teste de WiFi (carregamento de sites por meio de um script) e teste de vídeo (curta-metragem Big Buck Bunny (codificação H.264, FHD) em um loop), medimos tempos de execução de 8:00 horas e 10:02 horas, respectivamente. Esses valores são muito bons.

A bateria tem uma capacidade de 99,8 Wh.
A bateria tem uma capacidade de 99,8 Wh.
Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
15h 11min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 124)
8h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 44min
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-17%
-26%
-39%
-52%
-36%
Reader / Idle
911
753
-17%
758
-17%
403
-56%
H.264
602
541
-10%
WiFi v1.3
480
481
0%
483
1%
292
-39%
290
-40%
Load
164
100
-39%
60
-63%
65
-60%

Pro

+ tela QHD+ brilhante com proporção de 16:10 (240 Hz, Adaptive Sync, sRGB)
+ alto desempenho do sistema
+ dois slots de SSD (PCIe 4, M.2-2280)
+ A RAM pode ser trocada/expandida
+ iluminação de fundo RGB de tecla única
+ Thunderbolt 4
+ Fornecimento de energia
+ tempos de execução muito bons

Contra

- barulhento e quente sob carga total
- 8 GB de VRAM não muito preparado para o futuro
- sem Advanced Optimus

Veredicto - Portátil, potente, perseverante

O XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24), amostra de teste fornecida pela Schenker.
O XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24), amostra de teste fornecida pela Schenker.

As dimensões compactas e o baixo peso (aprox. 2,1 kg) não são prejudicados pela redução do desempenho do hardware. O Core i9 e o processador GeForce RTX 4070 são capazes de trabalhar com taxas de clock consistentemente altas. A fusão de desempenho e portabilidade do laptop pode ser classificada como um sucesso.

O XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) - um laptop potente e portátil para gamers e criadores.

O laptop fica bastante quente quando carregado e, ao fazê-lo, produz bastante ruído. Emissões mais moderadas exigem o sacrifício de alguma potência de computação. Sua tela de 15,3 polegadas (2.560 x 1.600 pixels, IPS, 240 Hz, Adaptive Sync) com proporção de 16:10 é impressionante no geral. Seu alto brilho é digno de nota.

Uma carga completa (99,8 Wh) é suficiente para tempos de execução práticos de cerca de 8 a 10 horas - valores muito bons. Ponto positivo: A bateria pode ser carregada por meio de uma fonte de alimentação USB-C (mín. 100 watts, 20 V) - a porta TB4 do laptop é compatível com o Power Delivery. Como resultado, o senhor não precisa necessariamente carregar a fonte de alimentação proprietária (280 watts) o tempo todo.

Uma alternativa poderia ser a Aorus 16X (2024). Esse laptop oferece uma potência de computação comparável, bem como tempos de execução igualmente bons.

Preço e disponibilidade

O XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) pode ser configurado e encomendado diretamente na loja on-line da Schenker. O dispositivo de teste atual custa cerca de US$ 2.500. Os preços começam a partir de aproximadamente US$ 1.700.

SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) - 05/01/2024 v7
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
83 / 98 → 84%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
72 / 80 → 90%
Peso
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Bateria
82 / 95 → 86%
Pantalha
92%
Desempenho do jogos
99%
Desempenho da aplicação
97%
Temperatura
81 / 95 → 85%
Ruído
68 / 90 → 76%
Audio
82%
Camera
46 / 85 → 54%
Médio
79%
89%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Análise do XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24): Um laptop RTX 4070 compacto para gamers e criadores
Sascha Mölck, 2024-05- 4 (Update: 2024-05- 4)