Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Schenker XMG Fusion 15: O design de referência da Intel desafia a concorrência

Sebastian Jentsch, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/08/2019

Swift reference design. A Intel e a Schenker criaram um portátil fino para jogos com boa duração da bateria, muito desempenho e uma seleção de portas no nível entusiasta. Será que vai acabar com as ofertas concorrentes da Razer, Acer, Gigabyte e Asus?

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19 (XMG Fusion 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Análises do: 885 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, Forceware 430.81, Optimus Intel UHD 630
Memória
16384 MB 
, Corsair PC4-21300
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE NV156FHM-N4G, IPS, 144Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, 500 GB 
, Raid 0 and 1
Placa de Som
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Mic, linha de saída, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20 x 356.4 x 233.7
Bateria
93 Wh, 8000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD webcam, Windows Hello compatible
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix 1280x720
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Teclado optomecânico com iluminação RGB por-tecla, chaves silenciosas, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de CA de 230-watts, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
1.89 kg, Suprimento de energia: 830 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15

Size Comparison

360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356.4 mm 233.7 mm 20 mm 1.9 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
197 MB/s ∼100% +154%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181 MB/s ∼92% +133%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 212, n=274)
92.5 MB/s ∼47% +19%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77.6 MB/s ∼39%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100% +180%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198.2 MB/s ∼82% +129%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=272)
110 MB/s ∼45% +27%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86.4 MB/s ∼36%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
696 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
694 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼98% +13%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼98% +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1620, n=307)
657 MBit/s ∼94% +9%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
603 (min: 531, max: 676) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100% +12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼99% +11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼96% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=307)
612 MBit/s ∼90% 0%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
611 (min: 491, max: 652) MBit/s ∼89%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
554 MBit/s ∼81% -9%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø603 (531-676)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø614 (541-652)
325
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE NV156FHM-N4G
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 331 cd/m² Médio: 309.4 cd/m² Minimum: 11.4 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 331 cd/m²
Contraste: 1034:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 1.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
BOE NV156FHM-N4G, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
6%
6%
-57%
-70%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 (4, 4)
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
10%
5.2 (2.6, 2.6)
35%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
-90%
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
-110%
Response Time Black / White *
9 (5, 4)
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
2%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-24%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-24%
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
-29%
PWM Frequency
23580 (24)
Screen
6%
12%
9%
8%
Brightness middle
331
286
-14%
288
-13%
266
-20%
314.7
-5%
Brightness
309
275
-11%
265
-14%
248
-20%
312
1%
Brightness Distribution
85
90
6%
84
-1%
89
5%
90
6%
Black Level *
0.32
0.37
-16%
0.22
31%
0.31
3%
0.38
-19%
Contrast
1034
773
-25%
1309
27%
858
-17%
828
-20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
2.19
51%
3.22
28%
2.78
38%
2.56
43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8
4.4
45%
6.26
22%
5.96
25%
4.89
39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.9
2.27
-19%
1.5
21%
0.91
52%
1.71
10%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.7
2.2
53%
3.43
27%
3.58
24%
3.4
28%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.41 91%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.3 96%
CCT
7537 86%
6405 101%
7290 89%
7186 90%
6435 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
59
0%
60
2%
62
5%
60.7
3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
91
0%
93
2%
96
5%
94.6
4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / 6%
9% / 11%
-24% / -1%
-31% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN grayscale - Before calibration
CalMAN grayscale - Before calibration
CalMAN saturation sweeps - Before calibration
CalMAN saturation sweeps - Before calibration
CalMAN Color Checker - Before calibration
CalMAN Color Checker - Before calibration
CalMAN grayscale - After calibration
CalMAN grayscale - After calibration
CalMAN saturation sweeps - After calibration
CalMAN saturation sweeps - After calibration
CalMAN Color Checker - After calibration
CalMAN Color Checker - After calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18215 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

System info: CPU-Z CPU
System info: CPU-Z cache
System info: CPU-Z mainboard
System info: CPU-Z memory
System info: CPU-Z SPD
System info: CPU-Z graphics
System info: GPU-Z
System info: GPU-Z Intel UHD Graphics
System info: HWiNFO
System info: Intel XTU
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300Tooltip
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1225 (1188.53-1294.79)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1053.71-1188.07)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
189 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
183 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=79)
183 Points ∼97% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼94% -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼93% -4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=564)
159 Points ∼84% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
1294 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
1188 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (932 - 1306, n=82)
1171 Points ∼90% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points ∼86% -14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=568)
871 Points ∼67% -33%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1294 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
183 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
114.77 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7357 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
7314 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (4938 - 8220, n=10)
7064 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
6936 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6888 Points ∼94% -6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6708 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11245, n=253)
6462 Points ∼88% -12%
Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7695 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
7661 Points ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7547 Points ∼98% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
7515 Points ∼98% 0%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7490 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (6834 - 7754, n=10)
7388 Points ∼96% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 9077, n=254)
7242 Points ∼94% -3%
Essentials
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
9534 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
9472 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (9140 - 9741, n=10)
9401 Points ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
9366 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
9231 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 11266, n=255)
8664 Points ∼91% -9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8517 Points ∼89% -11%
Score
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5784 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5746 Points ∼99% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (5115 - 5991, n=10)
5637 Points ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=257)
5291 Points ∼91% -9%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6035 Points ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5694 Points ∼94%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5607 Points ∼93% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (4520 - 6035, n=7)
5523 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6593, n=421)
5073 Points ∼84% -11%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
4890 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4851 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (3638 - 5661, n=7)
4692 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=438)
4274 Points ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4150 Points ∼85% -15%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4890 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5931 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5694 pontos
Ajuda
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
7%
15%
14%
-8%
21%
Write 4K
106.47
97.04
-9%
108.8
2%
115.5
8%
93.88
-12%
145 (99.3 - 197, n=13)
36%
Read 4K
42.24
49.58
17%
40.31
-5%
57.97
37%
40.56
-4%
47 (38.5 - 53.2, n=13)
11%
Write Seq
1465.81
1838
25%
2488
70%
1555
6%
1468
0%
1832 (1087 - 2900, n=13)
25%
Read Seq
1336.59
2421
81%
1916
43%
2590
94%
1540
15%
1815 (974 - 2929, n=13)
36%
Write 4K Q32T1
337.26
326.9
-3%
382.4
13%
369.3
10%
293.5
-13%
409 (311 - 557, n=13)
21%
Read 4K Q32T1
407.59
372.9
-9%
421.8
3%
441.7
8%
346
-15%
486 (351 - 648, n=13)
19%
Write Seq Q32T1
2932.8
1894
-35%
2542
-13%
1547
-47%
1941
-34%
3232 (2933 - 3280, n=13)
10%
Read Seq Q32T1
3235.3
2828
-13%
3320
3%
2969
-8%
3266
1%
3479 (3235 - 3565, n=13)
8%
AS SSD
-28%
-2%
-23%
-7%
4%
Copy Game MB/s
1216.28
1140.57
-6%
1200.14
-1%
1099 (787 - 1434, n=6)
-10%
Copy Program MB/s
511.09
454.24
-11%
525.53
3%
438 (243 - 570, n=6)
-14%
Copy ISO MB/s
1997.6
2085.95
4%
1974.98
-1%
1939 (1394 - 2728, n=6)
-3%
Score Total
4886
2896
-41%
4329
-11%
2870
-41%
4079
-17%
5051 (4379 - 5862, n=12)
3%
Score Write
2694
1528
-43%
1927
-28%
1141
-58%
2010
-25%
2534 (1902 - 2859, n=12)
-6%
Score Read
1454
923
-37%
1604
10%
1186
-18%
1362
-6%
1663 (1414 - 2359, n=12)
14%
Access Time Write *
0.031
0.04
-29%
0.065
-110%
0.033
-6%
0.0292 (0.023 - 0.037, n=12)
6%
Access Time Read *
0.063
0.08
-27%
0.042
33%
0.047
25%
0.0498 (0.033 - 0.092, n=12)
21%
4K-64 Write
2358.62
1253
-47%
1546.17
-34%
921.88
-61%
1717.43
-27%
2155 (1494 - 2444, n=12)
-9%
4K-64 Read
1159.12
623.93
-46%
1272.09
10%
875.61
-24%
1125.76
-3%
1355 (1156 - 2050, n=12)
17%
4K Write
117.18
103.6
-12%
143.57
23%
126.51
8%
110.72
-6%
132 (99.1 - 166, n=12)
13%
4K Read
50.57
48.32
-4%
42.95
-15%
59.11
17%
52.31
3%
52.9 (30 - 62.3, n=12)
5%
Seq Write
2178.95
1711.53
-21%
2374.01
9%
923.81
-58%
1822.26
-16%
2470 (2081 - 2779, n=12)
13%
Seq Read
2438.1
2505.83
3%
2888.39
18%
2516.94
3%
1839.67
-25%
2547 (2172 - 2975, n=12)
4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-11% / -13%
7% / 6%
-5% / -10%
-8% / -7%
13% / 10%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3235.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2932.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 407.59 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 337.26 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1336.59 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1465.81 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 42.24 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 106.47 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
25259 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
24267 Points ∼96% -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
22749 Points ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
22723 Points ∼90% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
22005 Points ∼87% -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (13457 - 25259, n=23)
21355 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=666)
14092 Points ∼56% -44%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
20201 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
19123 Points ∼95% -5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
18153 Points ∼90% -10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
18060 Points ∼89% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
17335 Points ∼86% -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (11022 - 20201, n=24)
16818 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=589)
11830 Points ∼59% -41%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
125189 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
114431 Points ∼91% -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
112480 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
109473 Points ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
106170 Points ∼85% -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (10944 - 125189, n=22)
85962 Points ∼69% -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=569)
69664 Points ∼56% -44%
3DMark 11 Performance
20181 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
39529 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17593 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
68.9 fps ∼98% +4%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
66 fps ∼94%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.4 (min: 54) fps ∼92% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (57 - 80.8, n=23)
64.4 fps ∼92% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.1 fps ∼91% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=356)
51.6 fps ∼74% -22%
F1 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
105 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (97 - 112, n=5)
104 fps ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
103 (min: 92) fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (10.8 - 152, n=31)
93.1 fps ∼89% -11%
Dirt Rally 2.0 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
79.1 (min: 64) fps ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
77.4 fps ∼98%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
75 (min: 53) fps ∼95% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (68.8 - 79.1, n=4)
74.4 fps ∼94% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 114, n=30)
70 fps ∼88% -10%
Anthem - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
79 (min: 64) fps ∼100% +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
75.7 (min: 49) fps ∼96% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (67.8 - 75.7, n=4)
71.9 fps ∼91% +2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
70.6 fps ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (24 - 112, n=21)
66.2 fps ∼84% -6%
Farming Simulator 19 - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
128.1 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (106 - 128, n=2)
117 fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.6 - 140, n=11)
75.1 fps ∼59% -41%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (57 - 85, n=9)
77.7 fps ∼100% +8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
74.2 fps ∼95% +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (23 - 124, n=76)
73.1 fps ∼94% +2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
72 fps ∼93%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
68.9 fps ∼98% +4%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
66 fps ∼94%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
64.4 (min: 54) fps ∼92% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (57 - 80.8, n=23)
64.4 fps ∼92% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
64.1 fps ∼91% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=356)
51.6 fps ∼74% -22%
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB; The Witcher 3: Ø66 (59-73)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8; The Witcher 3: Ø51.3 (44-61)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; The Witcher 3: Ø62.2 (57-70)
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø76.1 (70-81)
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; The Witcher 3: Ø49.5 (46-53)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; The Witcher 3: Ø50.3 (45-54)
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 66 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 77 72 fps
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) 128.1 fps
Anthem (2019) 70.6 fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 77.4 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 105 fps
The fan remains switched off permanently in silent mode
The fan remains switched off permanently in silent mode

Barulho

Ocioso
30 / 30 / 30 dB
Carga
46 / 51.6 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Emissions
Fan Noise
51.6
Noise
-9%
-5%
-8%
9%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.8
4%
Idle Minimum *
30
31
-3%
30
-0%
31
-3%
28.8
4%
Idle Average *
30
33
-10%
33
-10%
34
-13%
28.8
4%
Idle Maximum *
30
38
-27%
39
-30%
39
-30%
29.4
2%
Load Average *
46
50
-9%
45
2%
46
-0%
35.7
22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51.5
53
-3%
49
5%
53
-3%
42.5
17%
Load Maximum *
51.6
56
-9%
51
1%
55
-7%
45
13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-9% / -9%
-5% / -5%
-8% / -8%
9% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

 46 °C52.7 °C43.2 °C 
 27.6 °C45.3 °C28.6 °C 
 32.1 °C36.1 °C35.9 °C 
Máximo: 52.7 °C
Médio: 38.6 °C
41.6 °C50 °C44.1 °C
35.7 °C52.2 °C35.1 °C
33 °C36.1 °C33.3 °C
Máximo: 52.2 °C
Médio: 40.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  26.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.7 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.2 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 42.4 °C / 108 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.1 °C / 98.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-8.3 °C / -15 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.73132.72533.530.333.53138.231.638.24030.329.930.35034.831.234.86330.626.730.68025.326.625.31002624.72612528.123.828.116034.323.834.32003422.33425041.120.741.131548.320.148.340054.819.754.850056.619.256.663057.61957.680067.118.367.1100064.617.864.6125060.617.960.6160052.617.452.6200055.317.355.3250053.917.353.9315058.717.158.7400050.117.450.1500048.817.348.863005517.555800056.317.456.31000050.717.550.71250045.217.345.21600045.217.545.2SPL70.93070.9N25.71.325.7median 52.6median 17.8median 52.6Delta6.31.66.343.644.939.640.430.933.83542.828.335.92635.828.642.128.757.423.854.622.957.423.958.52560.92064.219.16417.965.117.372.516.97517.177.818.576.717.874.917.474.117.467.717.676.817.583.317.484.217.279.817.271.617.266.51769.216.863.43090.21.481.4median 17.5median 69.21.86hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.7 / 1.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 7.5 / 14.6 / 17 Watt
Carga midlight 181 / 243 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-61%
15%
-43%
8%
-29%
-47%
Idle Minimum *
7.5
24
-220%
7
7%
21
-180%
10.4
-39%
15.7 (5 - 46, n=20)
-109%
19.3 (1.9 - 113, n=743)
-157%
Idle Average *
14.6
27
-85%
12
18%
23
-58%
14.6
-0%
20.6 (12 - 59, n=20)
-41%
24.7 (6.6 - 119, n=743)
-69%
Idle Maximum *
17
33
-94%
22
-29%
32
-88%
16.3
4%
27 (16.3 - 65.5, n=20)
-59%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=743)
-78%
Load Average *
181
129
29%
86
52%
97
46%
88.5
51%
103 (83.4 - 181, n=20)
43%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=733)
43%
Load Maximum *
243
216
11%
177
27%
213
12%
182.4
25%
194 (120 - 243, n=20)
20%
174 (21.9 - 590, n=732)
28%
Witcher 3 ultra *
170
176
-4%
144
15%
148
13%
155.4
9%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
9h 19min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 00min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 28min
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 93 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q,  Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-35%
20%
40%
10%
34%
-32%
-5%
-25%
Reader / Idle
559
353
-37%
666
19%
545
-3%
682
22%
549
-2%
335
-40%
507
-9%
351 (39 - 1174, n=697)
-37%
WiFi v1.3
360
220
-39%
478
33%
421
17%
387
8%
382
6%
190
-47%
362
1%
261 (62 - 622, n=407)
-27%
Load
88
62
-30%
96
9%
181
106%
88
0%
174
98%
81
-8%
81
-8%
79.2 (18 - 202, n=664)
-10%
H.264
408
364
356
256 (88 - 508, n=151)

Pro

+ Turbo Boost quase permanentemente ativo
+ Bom desempenho de jogos
+ Teclado com boa resposta
+ Tela de 144 Hz responsiva
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Muitas portas incluindo Thunderbolt e USB 3.1 Gen 2
+ Wi-Fi veloz e atualizado
+ Muito bom microfone
+ Leve em relação à sua classe de desempenho
+ Manutenção e limpeza do ventilador simples

Contra

- Muito barulhento sob uso intenso/durante os jogos
- sRGB não é coberto plenamente
- Webcam pobre
Schenker Fusion 15: Gaming laptop with modest, ultrabook-like design
Schenker Fusion 15: Gaming laptop with modest, ultrabook-like design

O lado técnico das coisas se beneficiou muito da cooperação Intel-Schenker: O Fusion 15 oferece mais desempenho do que os portáteis de jogos finos concorrentes, apesar de estar equipado com o mesmo hardware. O desempenho da CPU se beneficia mais, enquanto as diferenças nos jogos são marginais. Isso não apenas reflete bem na solução de resfriamento, mas também representa um bom equilíbrio entre os limites de potência do SoC e da GPU.

Nossa configuração do Fusion 15 (RTX 2070) combina portabilidade e desempenho, que geralmente são mutuamente exclusivos, como quase nenhum outro dispositivo.

Por outro lado, o fino portátil de 15 polegadas possui uma bateria surpreendentemente boa: Conseguimos registrar tempos de duração de seis e pouco mais de nove horas em nosso teste de Wi-Fi e durante o modo inativo, respectivamente. Embora existam outros dispositivos que podem corresponder a esses números (Acer Predator Triton 500), eles não conseguem obter o mesmo tipo de desempenho dos componentes quando estão conectados na tomada.

A carcaça de liga de alumínio-magnésio pesa 200 gramas a menos que seus equivalentes de alumínio. Apesar disso, a qualidade de construção da carcaça modesta, mate e fácil de manusear, é boa.

A Schenker também não compromete a conectividade, a manutenção e a capacidade de atualização. O conector Thunderbolt ativado para DisplayPort e os dois slots M.2-2280 são igualmente impressionantes.

As desvantagens incluem, acima de tudo, os altos níveis de ruído durante os jogos e sob uso intenso. Para trabalhos criativos, a falta de cobertura sRGB plena e a baixa taxa de contraste também podem ser um problema. Por outro lado, os gamers serão afetados menos e poderão desfrutar de 144 Hz e tempos de resposta breves. Esses recursos quase compensam o contraste inferior.

Se você procura ainda mais desempenho, fineza e leveza, pode não ser a categoria certa para você. A Schenker e a Intel criaram uma combinação muito boa de portabilidade e desempenho.

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19 - 10/17/2019 v7
Sebastian Jentsch

Acabamento
82 / 98 → 84%
Teclado
97%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
60 / 80 → 75%
Peso
64 / 10-66 → 97%
Bateria
69 / 95 → 72%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
93%
Desempenho da aplicação
90%
Temperatura
80 / 95 → 84%
Ruído
78 / 90 → 86%
Audio
46%
Camera
30 / 85 → 35%
Médio
75%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Schenker XMG Fusion 15: O design de referência da Intel desafia a concorrência
Sebastian Jentsch, 2019-10- 8 (Update: 2019-10-19)