Breve Análise do Conversível Acer Aspire Switch 12 Alpha SA5-271-56HM

Name: Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Brand: Acer

Silêncio absoluto. Um sistema de resfriamento liquido em um conversível não funciona? Claro que sim! Pela primeira vez, a Acer instalou uma tecnologia de resfriamento silenciosa em um conversível de alto desempenho baseado nos processadores Core i5 e i7 da Intel. Esta inovação não é o único motivo pelo qual a concorrência será forte.

Nino Ricchizzi, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/29/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Convertible / 2-in-1 Skylake Tablet Touchscreen Windows Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of Acer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM (Aspire Switch Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake, Dois núcleos TPM 15 W

Placa gráfica

Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 400 MHz, Memoría: 930 MHz, 20.19.15.4454

Memória

4 GB

, DDR3L

Pantalha

12.00 polegadas 16:9, 2160 x 1440 pixel 216 PPI, capacitiva, multitouch, native pen support, Panasonic VVX12T041N00, IPS, Brilhante: sim, detachable screen

placa mãe

Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH

Disco rígido

Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, 256 GB

, 128 GB SATA 3.1

Placa de Som

Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Conexões

2 USB 3.0, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado, Card Reader: micro-SD, Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 11 x 291 x 201

Bateria

37 Wh Lítio-Polímero, 2 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720pSecondary Camera: 1.44 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: stereo speakers, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, Teclado, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

1.29 kg, Suprimento de energia: 330 g

Preço

800 Euro

Links

Acer página inicial
Acer Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB DIN A4 ❌

Right: Combo audio, USB 3.0, USB 3.1 Type-C, power-in


314 cd/m²	329 cd/m²	326 cd/m²
323 cd/m²	345 cd/m²	326 cd/m²
323 cd/m²	341 cd/m²	325 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Panasonic VVX12T041N00 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 345 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 328 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 345 cd/m²
Contraste: 908:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96% sRGB (Calman 2D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.63

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP	HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	Microsoft Surface Pro 3 HD Graphics 4400, 4300U, Hynix HFS128G3MNM	Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
Display		-4%	-20%	-0%	-4%	3%
Display P3 Coverage	65.5	62.4 -5%	53.8 -18%	65 -1%	63.6 -3%	68.1 4%
sRGB Coverage	96.1	93 -3%	73.7 -23%	96.5 0%	88.8 -8%	97.4 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	66.9	63.9 -4%	53.8 -20%	67 0%	65.6 -2%	70.2 5%
Response Times		-24%	-17%	-72%		-26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	20 ?(5, 15, detail 5 schraffiert)	28.4 ?(11.2, 17.2) -42%	33.2 ?(15.2, 18) -66%	46 ?(17.2, 28.8, plateau, spikes in between) -130%		30 ?(11, 19) -50%
Response Time Black / White *	34 ?(15, 19, PWM@100% mit/ohne PSU)	17.6 ?(3.6, 14) 48%	22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4) 33%	31.2 ?(6, 25.2, Spikes in between) 8%		16 ?(4.4, 11.6) 53%
PWM Frequency	1000 ?(100)	222.2 ?(49) -78%		50 ?(50) -95%		200 ?(18) -80%
Screen		-15%	-6%	17%	3%	-7%
Brightness middle	345	342.4 -1%	322 -7%	413 20%	355.3 3%	341 -1%
Brightness	328	315 -4%	319 -3%	396 21%	338 3%	318 -3%
Brightness Distribution	91	85 -7%	97 7%	87 -4%	91 0%	87 -4%
Black Level *	0.38	0.744 -96%	0.42 -11%	0.36 5%	0.33 13%	0.36 5%
Contrast	908	460 -49%	767 -16%	1147 26%	1077 19%	947 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	8.4	5.33 37%	6.02 28%	3.09 63%	4.72 44%	6 29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.9	9.25 22%	10.06 15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.3	5.36 -25%	6.29 -46%	3.92 9%	6.53 -52%	8.12 -89%
Gamma	2.63 ^84%	2.12 ^104%	2.4 ^92%	2.3 ^96%	2.17 ^101%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	7368 ^88%	7671 ^85%	7712 ^84%	7333 ^89%	6707 ^97%	7011 ^93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	62	57 -8%	47.8 -23%	61 -2%	59.37 -4%	63.4 2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		93	73.2	97		97.4
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-14% / -14%	-14% / -11%	-18% / -6%	-1% / 1%	-10% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

1000 Hz

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe	342 Points +18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	306 Points +6%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	289 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G	255 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP	234 Points -19%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	206 Points -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	200 Points -31%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006	177 Points -39%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

114 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

289 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

41.06 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe	3394 Points +3%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	3281 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G	2983 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP	2976 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	2770 Points -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	2733 Points -17%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006	2675 Points -18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	2426 Points -26%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006	4078 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP	4058 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe	4052 Points +1%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	3996 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G	3932 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	3837 Points -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	3697 Points -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	3186 Points -20%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3281 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3996 pontos
Ajuda

	Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP	HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G	HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006	Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
AS SSD		25%	15%	6%	-17%	-0%
Score Read	460	645 40%	450 -2%	351 -24%	333 -28%	459 0%
Score Write	228	239 5%	316 39%	338 48%	223 -2%	227 0%
Score Total	918	1190 30%	997 9%	864 -6%	722 -21%	913 -1%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		9%	10%	15%	0%	5%
Read Seq	518	666 29%	420.3 -19%	501 -3%	410.1 -21%	497.9 -4%
Write Seq	199.9	154.2 -23%	305.6 53%	297.2 49%	316 58%	153.5 -23%
Read 4k	29.3	28.51 -3%	32.36 10%	28.31 -3%	27.4 -6%	36.2 24%
Write 4k	76.8	101.5 32%	73.6 -4%	90.3 18%	53.5 -30%	95.5 24%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		17% / 16%	13% / 12%	11% / 11%	-9% / -7%	3% / 3%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2

Sequential Read: 518 MB/s

Sequential Write: 199.9 MB/s

512K Read: 374.9 MB/s

512K Write: 201 MB/s

4K Read: 29.3 MB/s

4K Write: 76.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 272 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 197.1 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	1585 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	1565 Points -1%
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006	1565 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20GKS01100 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	1372 Points -13%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G	1334 Points -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP	1283 Points -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	1109 Points -30%
HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006	1098 Points -31%

3DMark 11 Performance		1585 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5608 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7	49.1 fps +72%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB	30 fps +5%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM	28.6 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet	25 fps -13%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1	24.6 fps -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700	18.5 fps -35%

Legend

Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Intel Core i5-6200U, Intel HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2

Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Intel Core i5-6300U, Intel HD Graphics 520, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe

Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Intel Core i7-6650U, Intel Iris Graphics 540, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75, Intel HD Graphics 515, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP

HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel Core m5-6Y54, Intel HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G

HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA Intel Core m7-6Y75, Intel HD Graphics 515, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006

Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Intel Core m5-6Y54, Intel HD Graphics 515, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	54.4	28.6	24.2	6.9
Battlefield 4 (2013)	45.8	31.4	19.7	6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	17	10.8	6.1

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


33.4 °C	43 °C	46.7 °C
34.4 °C	44 °C	46.2 °C
37.7 °C	43 °C	44.4 °C

Máximo: 46.7 °C
Médio: 41.4 °C


47.6 °C	43.5 °C	37.3 °C
51 °C	43.9 °C	37.4 °C
48.3 °C	43.4 °C	37.2 °C

Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 43.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 44.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44.4 °C / 111.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-16.3 °C / -29.3 F).

	Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP	HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G	Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
Power Consumption		20%	27%	20%	14%	26%
Idle Minimum *	7.3	4.4 40%	5.87 20%	3.7 49%	4 45%	4.5 38%
Idle Average *	10	9 10%	6.05 39%	6.8 32%	8.6 14%	7.7 23%
Idle Maximum *	10.15	10.7 -5%	6.13 40%	7.6 25%	9.3 8%	8.3 18%
Load Average *	25.2	19.6 22%	21.27 16%	22.5 11%	18.6 26%	19.8 21%
Load Maximum *	29.3	19.9 32%	23.03 21%	34.5 -18%	36.3 -24%	20.6 30%

* ... smaller is better

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.3 / 0.4 Watt
Ocioso	7.3 / 10 / 10.15 Watt
Carga	25.2 / 29.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP	HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G	HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006	Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing	321	427 33%	300 -7%	443 38%	361 12%	440 37%
Battery Runtime		20%	2%	7%	49%	24%
Reader / Idle	640	899 40%	628 -2%	732 14%	954 49%	861 35%
H.264	468			432 -8%		450 -4%
Load	112	111 -1%	118 5%	130 16%	166 48%	157 40%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		27% / 24%	-3% / -1%	23% / 15%	31% / 36%	31% / 27%

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		10h 40min
WiFi Websurfing (Firefox 47.0)		5h 21min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 48min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 52min

Pro

+ Preparado para alto desempenho

+ Resfriamento sem ventoinha

+ Bons dispositivos de entrada

+ Construção sólida

Contra

- Alto falantes ruins

- Duração da bateria

In review: Acer Switch Alpha 12. Test model courtesy of Acer Germany

Uma história silenciosa que deixa um forte eco: O Acer Switch Alpha 12 não apenas apresenta um desafio com o seu preço de entrada de 800 Euros (~$883) incluindo dock de teclado, mas também com o seu pacote geral bem concebido com uma tecnologia de resfriamento inovadora. O conversível de 12-polegadas está alojado em uma carcaça bem construído, e dificilmente fica atrás de alguns rivais que podem ser o dobro de caros.

Um pouco pesado demais: O tablet poderia ser mais leve para o uso diário. Seus dispositivos de entrada estão quase no mesmo nível dos oponentes mais caros da Microsoft. A tela no novo conversível da Acer também é impressionante. Naturalmente, o desempenho possível sem uma ventoinha ativa é de interesse particular. Apesar de seu poderoso processador Intel Core i5, ele não tem nada que esconder dos rivais sem ventoinha. Com este design de resfriamento, o fabricante possivelmente criou uma tecnologia nova para portáteis e tablets finos. A concorrência terá dificuldades se a Acer melhora a duração da bateria e a reprodução do áudio no futuro.

Nós começamos a gostar do novo Switch Alpha 12 da Acer. Com um preço de 800 Euros (~$883) não é apenas uma alternativa acessível, mas também é melhor em alguns aspectos: O perturbante barulho da ventoinha é coisa do passado.

os usuários que não puderem aceitar a duração da bateria certamente deveriam dar uma olhada nos oponentes do Surface e no Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700. Ao comparar produtos da HP, como o HP Spectre x2, também é recomendado.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM - 2016-08-22 08/22/2016 v5.1^(old)
Nino Ricchizzi

Acabamento

84 / 98 → 86%

Teclado

85%

Mouse

91%

Conectividade

39 / 80 → 49%

Peso

80 / 35-78 → 100%

Bateria

87%

Pantalha

83%

Desempenho do jogos

56 / 68 → 83%

Desempenho da aplicação

82 / 87 → 94%

Temperatura

84%

Ruído

100%

Audio

30 / 91 → 33%

Camera

47 / 85 → 56%

Médio

73%

86%

Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Acer Aspire Switch 12 Alpha SA5-271-56HM

Nino Ricchizzi, 2016-06-29 (Update: 2016-07- 6)