Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Huawei MateBook D 14: AMD Ryzen 5 3500U Liberado
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.3 % | 03/2020 | Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS R5 3500U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-41G-R491 R5 3500U, Radeon 540X | 1.5 kg | 17.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |||
| 81.2 % | 02/2020 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10 | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 74.5 % | 01/2020 | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230 | 1.8 kg | 21 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.2 % | 03/2020 | Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY R5 3500U, Vega 8 | 1.5 kg | 16.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.6 % | 05/2019 | Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL R5 2500U, Vega 8 | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.8 % | 11/2018 | Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 251 cd/m²
Contraste: 1136:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
69.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
48.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
46.54% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS Chi Mei CMN1404, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T CEC PA LM140LF-3L03, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF Chi Mei 140HCA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AU Optronics AUO28ED, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL BOE083C, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 38% | -10% | -13% | -6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 46.54 | 66.7 43% | 41.84 -10% | 40.49 -13% | 44.26 -5% |
| sRGB Coverage | 69.8 | 92.3 32% | 62.3 -11% | 60.9 -13% | 65.1 -7% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 48.1 | 67.5 40% | 43.33 -10% | 41.84 -13% | 45.73 -5% |
| Response Times | -26% | -33% | -7% | -39% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41.2 ? | 36 ? 13% | 41 ? -0% | 43.6 ? -6% | 42.4 ? -3% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 26 ? 10% | 31 ? -8% | 31.2 ? -8% | 32.8 ? -14% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 44 ? -100% | 2500 ? -90% | 198.4 ? -99% | |
| Screen | -10% | -5% | 9% | -4% | |
| Brightness middle | 250 | 253 1% | 226 -10% | 271 8% | 287 15% |
| Brightness | 241 | 245 2% | 214 -11% | 256 6% | 276 15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 78 -17% | 92 -2% | 90 -4% | 86 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.225 -2% | 0.17 23% | 0.15 32% | 0.25 -14% |
| Contrast | 1136 | 1124 -1% | 1329 17% | 1807 59% | 1148 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 8.89 -102% | 5.21 -18% | 4.7 -7% | 5.4 -23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.7 | 4.56 77% | 22.15 -12% | 20.4 -4% | 18.1 8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.2 | 4.9 -17% | 4.43 -5% | 4.6 -10% | 5 -19% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 6.33 -118% | 3.27 -13% | 1.6 45% | 3.1 -7% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.52 87% | 2.36 93% | 2.17 101% | 1.99 111% |
| CCT | 7045 92% | 6745 96% | 6538 99% | 6649 98% | 6769 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 44.3 | 60 35% | 40 -10% | 38.5 -13% | 41.8 -6% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 69.6 | 91 31% | 62 -11% | 60.6 -13% | 64.6 -7% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
-4% | -16% /
-11% | -4% /
3% | -16% /
-11% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25000 Hz | ≤ 30 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3669 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4772 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3818 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Average WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -34% | 2% | -7% | 18% | |
| Write 4K | 145.4 | 118.8 -18% | 159.6 10% | 134.8 -7% | 164.3 ? 13% |
| Read 4K | 46.25 | 41.62 -10% | 53.5 16% | 41.68 -10% | 48.2 ? 4% |
| Write Seq | 2583 | 796 -69% | 1174 -55% | 1651 -36% | 2096 ? -19% |
| Read Seq | 2141 | 1101 -49% | 1648 -23% | 2300 7% | 2123 ? -1% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 239.5 | 234.7 -2% | 420.8 76% | 260 9% | 451 ? 88% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 340 | 313.8 -8% | 564 66% | 335.1 -1% | 509 ? 50% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2701 | 842 -69% | 1231 -54% | 1641 -39% | 2551 ? -6% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2871 | 1645 -43% | 2274 -21% | 3452 20% | 3330 ? 16% |
| AS SSD | -25% | -93% | -4% | 4% | |
| Seq Read | 2263 | 1417 -37% | 2074 -8% | 2613 15% | 2605 ? 15% |
| Seq Write | 2255 | 781 -65% | 775 -66% | 1549 -31% | 1905 ? -16% |
| 4K Read | 40.36 | 37.03 -8% | 37.81 -6% | 47.15 17% | 45.8 ? 13% |
| 4K Write | 116.9 | 80.1 -31% | 101.3 -13% | 111.6 -5% | 155.6 ? 33% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1282 | 740 -42% | 1265 -1% | 748 -42% | 1181 ? -8% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1224 | 748 -39% | 383.5 -69% | 1275 4% | 1372 ? 12% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.074 | 0.047 36% | 0.081 -9% | 0.062 16% | 0.0801 ? -8% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.039 | 0.045 -15% | 0.263 -574% | 0.042 -8% | 0.04195 ? -8% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -30% /
-29% | -46% /
-46% | -6% /
-6% | 11% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13768 - 65911, n=39, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (7309 - 19399, n=37) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-41G-R491 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2837 - 12349, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-41G-R491 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (1095 - 2901, n=41) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (811 - 4773, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-41G-R491 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (523 - 790, n=23) | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4013 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13711 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2372 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 120 | 21.05 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 70.9 | 63.7 | 39 | 36.3 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 26.6 | 20.2 | 17.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.6 / 29.6 / 29.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 30.7 / 33.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.6 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.9 °C / 87.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.6 °C / -4.7 F).
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.37 / 0.66 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5.2 / 7.7 / 8.7 Watt |
| Carga |
35.4 / 48.3 Watt |
   
| |
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS R5 3500U, Vega 8, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY R5 3500U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL R5 2500U, Vega 8, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | -5% | -8% | -1% | 17% | -8% | -18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.2 | 3.6 31% | 4.7 10% | 5.2 -0% | 5.3 -2% | 3.7 29% | 5.68 ? -9% | 4.9 ? 6% |
| Idle Average * | 7.7 | 7.2 6% | 6.6 14% | 8.8 -14% | 7.8 -1% | 6.9 10% | 8.75 ? -14% | 8.36 ? -9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.7 | 10.8 -24% | 5.9 32% | 10.2 -17% | 8.46 3% | 8.4 3% | 10.1 ? -16% | 10.4 ? -20% |
| Load Average * | 35.4 | 38 -7% | 56 -58% | 37.5 -6% | 36.9 -4% | 32 10% | 37.8 ? -7% | 45.9 ? -30% |
| Load Maximum * | 48.3 | 45.2 6% | 60.2 -25% | 50.9 -5% | 49.4 -2% | 32.6 33% | 46.2 ? 4% | 66 ? -37% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS R5 3500U, Vega 8, 56 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10, 47 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230, 42 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY R5 3500U, Vega 8, 42 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL R5 2500U, Vega 8, 57.4 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -21% | -34% | -40% | -24% | -9% | -13% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 862 | 404 -53% | 390 -55% | 470 -45% | 542 -37% | 597 -31% | 629 ? -27% |
| Load | 113 | 125 11% | 98 -13% | 75 -34% | 101 -11% | 129 14% | 115.4 ? 2% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – Huawei fez muitas coisas bem com o MateBook D 14
O MateBook D 14 da Huawei é outro exemplo que prova que um portátil bem pensado não precisa necessariamente ser caro. Seu maior benefício é o desempenho consistente da CPU, que permaneceu sem afogamentos sob uso intenso e com bateria. Outro benefício é o sistema de refrigeração que conseguiu domesticar os componentes internos e manter baixas temperaturas gerais sem sacrificar a quietude ao mesmo tempo. Graças a essa combinação, o portátil de 14 polegadas não é apenas poderoso, mas também adequado para ambientes sensíveis ao ruído.
Mais uma vez, a Huawei permanece com total controle sobre as temperaturas do MateBook D 14, resultando em desempenho máximo sem afogamentos.
Assim como no D15, nossas únicas queixas com o D 14 são a visão de sapo da webcam, as opções limitadas de manutenção do portátil e a falta de teclas de início e fim no teclado. No entanto, dado o desempenho geral do portátil e seu baixo preço, é fácil superar, principalmente considerando que nem todos serão igualmente afetados por essas restrições.
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS
-
03/08/2020 v7
Mike Wobker
Pricecompare
