Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA: Também causa uma boa impressão com Ryzen

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 02/19/2020

Zen-tastic. O Asus ZenBook 14 também causa uma boa impressão com o Ryzen 7 mais potente da AMD, mas não consegue atingir seu potencial máximo de desempenho, apesar dos ventiladores ativos. Com seu design plano, o portátil de 14 polegadas permanece útil como de costume e os pequenos recursos, como o teclado numérico integrado, são divertidos. Nossa análise mostra o que mais encontramos no ZenBook 14.

Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T (ZenBook 14 Serie)
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4 2400, dual-channel
Pantalha
14 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, CEC PA LM140LF-3L03, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Disco rígido
SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, 512 GB 
, 430 GB livre
Placa de Som
AMD Raven - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD
Funcionamento em rede
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 16 x 324 x 212
Bateria
47 Wh, 6150 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 0.9 MP, 16:9 (1280x720)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: stereo, Harman/Kardon, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Mala para acrregar, McAfee, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
1.39 kg, Suprimento de energia: 151 g
Preço
700 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81 %
02/2020
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
R7 3700U, Vega 10
1.4 kg16 mm14"1920x1080
88 %
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
R7 3700U, Vega 10
1.9 kg19.9 mm15.6"1920x1080
80 %
08/2019
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
R7 3700U, Vega 10
1.8 kg19.5 mm15.6"1920x1080
81 %
01/2020
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
i5-10210U, GeForce MX250
1.2 kg16 mm14"1920x1080
79 %
01/2020
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250
1.6 kg18 mm14"1920x1080
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T

Size comparison

369 mm 252 mm 19.9 mm 1.9 kg359.1 mm 249 mm 19.5 mm 1.8 kg327 mm 226 mm 18 mm 1.6 kg324 mm 212 mm 16 mm 1.4 kg322 mm 222 mm 16 mm 1.2 kg
Left side: power supply, HDMI, 1x USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-C
Left side: power supply, HDMI, 1x USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-C
Right side: SD card reader, combined 3.5 mm audio jack, 1x USB 2.0 Type-A
Right side: SD card reader, combined 3.5 mm audio jack, 1x USB 2.0 Type-A
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
77.1 MB/s ∼100% +192%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8 - 186, n=128)
62.5 MB/s ∼81% +137%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.7 MB/s ∼49% +43%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s ∼42% +21%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28 MB/s ∼36% +6%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.4 MB/s ∼34%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
87.6 MB/s ∼100% +136%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (17.7 - 251, n=130)
79 MB/s ∼90% +113%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.6 MB/s ∼43% +1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.1 MB/s ∼42%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33 MB/s ∼38% -11%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.1 MB/s ∼31% -27%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1070 MBit/s ∼100% +157%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
640 MBit/s ∼60% +54%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (30.9 - 1460, n=141)
546 MBit/s ∼51% +31%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
416 (min: 375, max: 465) MBit/s ∼39%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
309 MBit/s ∼29% -26%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
928 MBit/s ∼100% +55%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
613 MBit/s ∼66% +3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
598 (min: 519, max: 628) MBit/s ∼64%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (36 - 1416, n=141)
538 MBit/s ∼58% -10%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
290 MBit/s ∼31% -52%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630Tooltip
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø415 (375-465)
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø598 (519-628)
275
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
245
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
215
cd/m²
239
cd/m²
240
cd/m²
221
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
CEC PA LM140LF-3L03
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 275 cd/m² Médio: 245.4 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
iluminação: 78 %
iluminação com acumulador: 263 cd/m²
Contraste: 1124:1 (Preto: 0.225 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.89 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 4.9
ΔE Greyscale 6.33 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.52
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
CEC PA LM140LF-3L03, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
NV156FHM-N49, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
LG Philips 156WFC, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
AUO543D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Response Times
878%
8%
18891%
-42%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
36 (19, 17)
41.2 (22, 19.2)
-14%
28.4 (10.4, 18)
21%
39.2 (20.8, 18.4)
-9%
60.8 (29.2, 31.6)
-69%
Response Time Black / White *
26 (15, 11)
32.8 (18, 14.8)
-26%
27.2 (16.4, 10.8)
-5%
35.6 (21.2, 14.4)
-37%
29.6 (13.2, 16.4)
-14%
PWM Frequency
44 (20)
1220 (99)
2673%
25000 (28)
56718%
Screen
-16%
-22%
30%
14%
Brightness middle
253
318
26%
253.6
0%
324.1
28%
395
56%
Brightness
245
297
21%
227
-7%
301
23%
375
53%
Brightness Distribution
78
89
14%
84
8%
87
12%
91
17%
Black Level *
0.225
0.17
24%
0.27
-20%
0.22
2%
0.26
-16%
Contrast
1124
1871
66%
939
-16%
1473
31%
1519
35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.89
5.5
38%
6.05
32%
1.63
82%
5.92
33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.56
21
-361%
14.03
-208%
4.25
7%
9.79
-115%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.9
5.1
-4%
4.97
-1%
1.42
71%
0.91
81%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.33
1.8
72%
3.2
49%
2.2
65%
6.69
-6%
Gamma
2.52 87%
2.12 104%
2 110%
2.26 97%
2.78 79%
CCT
6745 96%
6257 104%
6820 95%
6887 94%
7596 86%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
37.6
-37%
35.5
-41%
60.2
0%
63
5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
58.2
-36%
55.6
-39%
95
4%
98
8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
431% / 175%
-7% / -17%
9461% / 4071%
-14% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 44 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 44 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 44 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17113 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U: Ø512 (499.03-642.87)
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U: Ø684 (680.39-687.17)
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U: Ø654 (639.01-676.19)
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø565 (559.89-595.69)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø625 (592.25-691)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
190 Points ∼100% +43%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Intel Core i5-10210U
170 Points ∼89% +28%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
144 Points ∼76% +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
  (127 - 146, n=7)
138 Points ∼73% +4%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
135 Points ∼71% +2%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
133 Points ∼70%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20 - 185, n=295)
117 Points ∼62% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
691 Points ∼100% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
683 (min: 680.39, max: 687.17) Points ∼99% +6%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
672 Points ∼97% +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
  (537 - 683, n=7)
648 Points ∼94% +1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
642 Points ∼93%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Intel Core i5-10210U
513 Points ∼74% -20%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (32 - 1051, n=307)
354 Points ∼51% -45%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
133 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
642 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
48.35 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4461 Points ∼100% +29%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3581 Points ∼80% +3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
3466 Points ∼78%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (3082 - 3581, n=7)
3333 Points ∼75% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
3258 Points ∼73% -6%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
3233 Points ∼72% -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (405 - 4338, n=110)
2527 Points ∼57% -27%
Productivity
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
7433 Points ∼100% +28%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7040 Points ∼95% +21%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5859 Points ∼79% +1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
5823 Points ∼78%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (5459 - 5952, n=7)
5745 Points ∼77% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
5637 Points ∼76% -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1014 - 7281, n=110)
5203 Points ∼70% -11%
Essentials
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
8912 Points ∼100% +16%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7861 Points ∼88% +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7692 Points ∼86% 0%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
7685 Points ∼86%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (6927 - 7692, n=7)
7306 Points ∼82% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
6927 Points ∼78% -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2062 - 9664, n=110)
6867 Points ∼77% -11%
Score
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4497 Points ∼100% +17%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
4289 Points ∼95% +11%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3903 Points ∼87% +1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
3851 Points ∼86%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (3522 - 3903, n=7)
3720 Points ∼83% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
3605 Points ∼80% -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (743 - 4609, n=113)
3182 Points ∼71% -17%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4992 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
4842 Points ∼97%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (4418 - 4869, n=6)
4665 Points ∼93% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
4593 Points ∼92% -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4429 Points ∼89% -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1283 - 5363, n=229)
4080 Points ∼82% -16%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (3325 - 3993, n=7)
3628 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
3604 Points ∼99%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3504 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
3464 Points ∼95% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
3342 Points ∼92% -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1027 - 4211, n=257)
3058 Points ∼84% -15%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3604 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4842 pontos
Ajuda
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Average SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
11%
-3%
15%
108%
10%
Write 4K
118.8
129.5
9%
105.9
-11%
107.7
-9%
181.6
53%
110 (89.3 - 122, n=3)
-7%
Read 4K
41.62
41.23
-1%
36.56
-12%
39.73
-5%
57.41
38%
40.6 (37.4 - 42.7, n=3)
-2%
Write Seq
795.7
810.7
2%
1165
46%
926.3
16%
1982
149%
677 (608 - 796, n=3)
-15%
Read Seq
1101
1145
4%
423.2
-62%
1014
-8%
1899
72%
1104 (1019 - 1193, n=3)
0%
Write 4K Q32T1
234.7
314.1
34%
332.1
41%
343.6
46%
509.4
117%
438 (235 - 590, n=3)
87%
Read 4K Q32T1
313.8
356.2
14%
229.3
-27%
499.1
59%
544.7
74%
338 (285 - 415, n=3)
8%
Write Seq Q32T1
842.3
838.5
0%
1460
73%
1033
23%
3072
265%
860 (842 - 872, n=3)
2%
Read Seq Q32T1
1645
2042
24%
472.5
-71%
1604
-2%
3281
99%
1786 (1635 - 2078, n=3)
9%
AS SSD
5%
-9%
-25%
79%
6%
Score Total
2270
2261
0%
2279
0%
2294
1%
4568
101%
2315 (2234 - 2442, n=3)
2%
Score Write
906
831
-8%
1155
27%
916
1%
1853
105%
867 (843 - 906, n=3)
-4%
Score Read
918
973
6%
721
-21%
911
-1%
1801
96%
981 (918 - 1085, n=3)
7%
Access Time Write *
0.045
0.036
20%
0.047
-4%
0.136
-202%
0.03
33%
0.0353 (0.03 - 0.045, n=3)
22%
Access Time Read *
0.047
0.04
15%
0.072
-53%
0.084
-79%
0.094
-100%
0.046 (0.045 - 0.047, n=3)
2%
4K-64 Write
747.86
668.81
-11%
984.63
32%
733.32
-2%
1456.46
95%
763 (672 - 871, n=3)
2%
4K-64 Read
739.73
763.82
3%
646.86
-13%
769.2
4%
1473.01
99%
794 (740 - 869, n=3)
7%
4K Write
80.08
87.71
10%
82.07
2%
86.98
9%
147.5
84%
109 (80.1 - 127, n=3)
36%
4K Read
37.03
39.18
6%
34.54
-7%
35.59
-4%
52.09
41%
40.2 (37 - 43.2, n=3)
9%
Seq Write
781.17
740.1
-5%
884.4
13%
953
22%
2493.03
219%
612 (518 - 781, n=3)
-22%
Seq Read
1417.21
1697.5
20%
398.93
-72%
1060.87
-25%
2762.37
95%
1471 (1264 - 1731, n=3)
4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
8% / 7%
-6% / -6%
-5% / -8%
94% / 91%
8% / 8%

* ... smaller is better

SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1645 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 842.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 313.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 234.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1101 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 795.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.62 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 118.8 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i5-10210U
4920 Points ∼100% +45%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-1065G7
4614 Points ∼94% +36%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
4165 Points ∼85% +23%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (2688 - 4165, n=15)
3455 Points ∼70% +2%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
3389 Points ∼69%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
3287 Points ∼67% -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (230 - 10699, n=381)
1381 Points ∼28% -59%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i5-10210U
3845 Points ∼100% +69%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-1065G7
3580 Points ∼93% +58%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
2999 Points ∼78% +32%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
2272 Points ∼59%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (1567 - 2999, n=14)
2157 Points ∼56% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
2025 Points ∼53% -11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (222 - 3726, n=262)
1103 Points ∼29% -51%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i5-10210U
23376 Points ∼100% +46%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
20784 Points ∼89% +30%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
16048 Points ∼69%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
  (9364 - 20784, n=14)
14465 Points ∼62% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
13891 Points ∼59% -13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1484 - 22615, n=285)
7953 Points ∼34% -50%
3DMark 11 Performance
3449 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
11126 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
2028 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 93.78 60.7 49.72 17.4 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 68.7 58.6 36 30.2 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 16.1 8.1 fps

Barulho

Ocioso
28 / 28 / 28 dB
Carga
36.8 / 39 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.428.230.933.731.425333134.734.133313131.332.430.9314030.531.731.22930.55030.829.328.72930.86328.128.627.627.228.18025.725.626.726.425.710025.625.924.524.225.612524.824.723.824.524.816023.624.123.724.523.620022.422.921.922.522.425021.922.421.521.721.931521.821.320.720.221.840021.920.819.719.221.950022.622.21918.522.663028.126.518.318.828.180028.72617.71828.7100030.628.517.317.430.6125030.127.317.117.330.1160028.325.816.71728.3200029.326.916.917.129.325002825.317.116.92831502523.117.217.225400026.824.517.517.426.850002421.317.617.62463002018.917.817.720800018.518.417.617.818.51000017.91817.617.717.91250017.61817.417.517.61600017.718.417.517.517.7SPL3936.829.829.939N2.92.51.31.32.9median 24median 23.1median 17.6median 17.7median 24Delta42.81.71.64hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
Carga Máxima
 37 °C36.9 °C34.3 °C 
 35.3 °C34.8 °C24.4 °C 
 29.4 °C26.9 °C26.2 °C 
Máximo: 37 °C
Médio: 31.7 °C
32.6 °C34.7 °C36.3 °C
27.5 °C32.2 °C35 °C
26.6 °C28.5 °C30.5 °C
Máximo: 36.3 °C
Médio: 31.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  45 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket / Fluke t3000 FC
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.4 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.5 °C / 83.3 F (-0.9 °C / -1.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.733.733.72535.534.135.53130.830.930.84030.82930.85028.72928.76328.427.228.48031.326.431.310041.524.241.512547.124.547.116048.324.548.320045.822.545.82505321.75331561.820.261.840065.619.265.650065.318.565.363063.318.863.380065.11865.1100066.417.466.4125066.917.366.9160069.51769.5200068.917.168.9250063.716.963.7315060.117.260.140006017.460500057.717.657.7630057.517.757.5800054.217.854.2100005117.7511250051.617.551.61600053.917.553.9SPL76.729.976.7N37.31.337.3median 60median 17.7median 60Delta71.6735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020TApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.32 / 0.36 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.6 / 7.2 / 10.8 Watt
Carga midlight 38 / 45.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
R7 3700U, Vega 10, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
R7 3700U, Vega 10, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
R7 3700U, Vega 10, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
6%
6%
-16%
-21%
-1%
-21%
Idle Minimum *
3.6
4.2
-17%
4.2
-17%
4.2
-17%
4
-11%
4.57 (3.2 - 5.9, n=15)
-27%
6.54 (1 - 36, n=620)
-82%
Idle Average *
7.2
7.92
-10%
6.8
6%
5.9
18%
7
3%
7.51 (2.8 - 10.6, n=15)
-4%
9.74 (2.06 - 39, n=620)
-35%
Idle Maximum *
10.8
8.16
24%
7
35%
7.2
33%
10
7%
9.63 (7 - 12.9, n=15)
11%
12 (3.9 - 55, n=620)
-11%
Load Average *
38
29
24%
36.5
4%
63.4
-67%
62
-63%
33.5 (24.2 - 40.6, n=15)
12%
33.4 (6.3 - 75, n=610)
12%
Load Maximum *
45.2
42.2
7%
44
3%
67.4
-49%
64
-42%
44.8 (38.5 - 55.5, n=15)
1%
40.5 (7.6 - 111, n=613)
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
37.9
53.5
58

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
17h 48min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 44min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 05min
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T
R7 3700U, Vega 10, 47 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE
R7 3700U, Vega 10, 45 Wh
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585
R7 3700U, Vega 10, 42 Wh
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
-8%
-17%
1%
-30%
-8%
Reader / Idle
1068
941
-12%
856
-20%
986
-8%
694
-35%
624 (87 - 2557, n=555)
-42%
WiFi v1.3
404
460
14%
421
4%
515
27%
368
-9%
483 (206 - 862, n=239)
20%
Load
125
92
-26%
81
-35%
105
-16%
69
-45%
122 (40 - 347, n=567)
-2%

Pro

+ Plano e leve
+ Design atraente
+ Teclado numérico integrado no Clickpad

Contra

- Poucas opções de manutenção
- Superfície suave do teclado
- Desempenho moderado da CPU
- Duração moderada da bateria

Veredicto - Design bonito com CPU mais lenta

In review: Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA. Test device provided by:
In review: Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA. Test device provided by:

Com o Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA, os compradores adquirem um portátil com um ótimo design e fácil de transportar por um preço comparativamente baixo. A carcaça parece de alta qualidade e vários elementos decorativos dão a impressão de que é mais caro. Além disso, há o recurso do teclado numérico integrado, que acabou sendo uma adição útil ao teclado. A configuração de portas é sólida e, embora o Wi-Fi 5 não seja um grande salto, as conexões sem fio ainda são rápidas e atualizadas.

O ZenBook 14 é um portátil sólido com um design atraente. Infelizmente, ele só pode explorar o poder de sua CPU moderadamente.

No entanto, os possíveis compradores não devem se limitar a esse modelo com a Ryzen 7 3700U, mas podem optar com confiança pela próxima CPU mais fraca. Como o sistema de resfriamento pode suportar o desempenho pleno apenas durante um curto período, o desempenho a longo prazo está bem abaixo das expectativas que estabelecemos para este processador. Como a memória não pode ser atualizada, seu tamanho também precisa ser levado em consideração na determinação de um modelo adequado antes da compra. Se você está interessado principalmente no design e nos números, e não necessariamente no desempenho real, ainda pode comprar este portátil sem hesitar.

Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T - 02/11/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
80 / 98 → 82%
Teclado
80%
Mouse
75%
Conectividade
41 / 75 → 55%
Peso
70 / 20-75 → 91%
Bateria
73%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
57 / 78 → 73%
Desempenho da aplicação
76 / 85 → 89%
Temperatura
95%
Ruído
96%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Médio
71%
81%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA: Também causa uma boa impressão com Ryzen
Mike Wobker, 2020-02-19 (Update: 2020-03- 1)