Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Huawei MateBook D 15: Ainda um bom portátil com AMD
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY (Matebook D 15 Serie)
Processador
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 4 x 2.1 - 3.7 GHz, Picasso-U (Zen+)
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Memória
8 GB
, Dual-channel
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics AUO28ED, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, 256 GB
, 192 GB livre
peso
1.523 kg, Suprimento de energia: 200 g
Preço
650 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.2 % | 03/2020 | Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY R5 3500U, Vega 8 | 1.5 kg | 16.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 78.4 % | 11/2019 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW R5 3500U, Vega 8 | 1.8 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.8 % | 02/2020 | Lenovo ThinkBook 15 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.9 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 78.5 % | 02/2020 | HP 15s-fq1556ng i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | 1.7 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.3 % | 03/2020 | Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS R5 3500U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø652 (593-667)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø309 (278-319)
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø661 (334-686)
HP 15s-fq1556ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø276 (259-289)
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø642 (619-656)
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø502 (323-535)
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø679 (335-729)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø588 (564-603)
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø697 (663-718)
HP 15s-fq1556ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø253 (214-288)
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø645 (332-675)
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø591 (528-688)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics AUO28ED tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 271 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 256.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.6 cd/m²iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 271 cd/m²
Contraste: 1807:1 (Preto: 0.15 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
60.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.84% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.49% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AU Optronics AUO28ED, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW CEC PANDA LM156LF-CL07, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F BOE0764 / TV140FHM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkBook 15 LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP 15s-fq1556ng AU Optronics B156HW02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | 6% | -5% | -7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.49 | 39.53 -2% | 43.19 7% | 38.38 -5% | 37.66 -7% |
| sRGB Coverage | 60.9 | 59.5 -2% | 64 5% | 57.7 -5% | 56.4 -7% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.84 | 40.84 -2% | 44.62 7% | 39.67 -5% | 38.91 -7% |
| Response Times | 19% | -7% | 12% | -10% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.6 ? | 36 ? 17% | 41 ? 6% | 37.6 ? 14% | 51 ? -17% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 31.2 ? | 25 ? 20% | 37 ? -19% | 28 ? 10% | 32 ? -3% |
| PWM Frequency | 178 ? | 200 ? | |||
| Screen | -38% | -29% | -24% | -23% | |
| Brightness middle | 271 | 250 -8% | 291 7% | 245 -10% | 254 -6% |
| Brightness | 256 | 228 -11% | 276 8% | 239 -7% | 234 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 83 -8% | 85 -6% | 82 -9% | 86 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.15 | 0.205 -37% | 0.46 -207% | 0.25 -67% | 0.18 -20% |
| Contrast | 1807 | 1220 -32% | 633 -65% | 980 -46% | 1411 -22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 5.65 -20% | 4.3 9% | 5.6 -19% | 5.58 -19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.4 | 13.7 33% | 10.01 51% | 15.6 24% | 9.83 52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.6 | 3.18 31% | 4.8 -4% | 4.53 2% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 6.32 -295% | 4.21 -163% | 3.4 -113% | 5.02 -214% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.45 90% | 2.46 89% | 2.3 96% | 2.83 78% |
| CCT | 6649 98% | 7287 89% | 6867 95% | 7156 91% | 6570 99% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38.5 | 38 -1% | 41 6% | 36.5 -5% | 36 -6% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60.6 | 59 -3% | 64 6% | 57.5 -5% | 56 -8% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -7% /
-23% | -10% /
-20% | -6% /
-16% | -13% /
-18% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Ryzen 5 3500U: Ø669 (662.73-672.62)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Ryzen 5 3500U: Ø508 (460.33-641.41)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Ryzen 5 3500U: Ø505 (498.72-514.09)
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø537 (517.78-687.49)
HP 15s-fq1556ng Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel Core i5-1035G1: Ø507 (150.07-663.92)
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Ryzen 5 3500U: Ø661 (656.73-674.67)
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø525 (518.44-565)
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3641 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4699 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3743 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP 15s-fq1556ng Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -17% | 30% | 7% | 43% | |
| Write 4K | 134.8 | 114.9 -15% | 176.3 31% | 203.1 51% | 116.1 ? -14% |
| Read 4K | 41.68 | 52.7 26% | 48.98 18% | 65.3 57% | 189.5 ? 355% |
| Write Seq | 1651 | 1361 -18% | 1789 8% | 973 -41% | 1409 ? -15% |
| Read Seq | 2300 | 1385 -40% | 1671 -27% | 1651 -28% | 1624 ? -29% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 260 | 181.1 -30% | 433.5 67% | 526 102% | 360 ? 38% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 335.1 | 340.5 2% | 526 57% | 345.2 3% | 396 ? 18% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1641 | 1519 -7% | 2983 82% | 980 -40% | 1492 ? -9% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3452 | 1515 -56% | 3555 3% | 1883 -45% | 3313 ? -4% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 1688 | 1152 ? | |||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 1036 | 736 ? | |||
| AS SSD | -30% | 34% | -19% | -12% | |
| Seq Read | 2613 | 1358 -48% | 2564 -2% | 1705 -35% | 2032 ? -22% |
| Seq Write | 1549 | 1300 -16% | 2268 46% | 904 -42% | 1339 ? -14% |
| 4K Read | 47.15 | 44.88 -5% | 57 21% | 58.5 24% | 46.1 ? -2% |
| 4K Write | 111.6 | 77.5 -31% | 141.4 27% | 165.4 48% | 107.4 ? -4% |
| 4K-64 Read | 748 | 586 -22% | 1175 57% | 323.1 -57% | 712 ? -5% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1275 | 738 -42% | 1665 31% | 827 -35% | 999 ? -22% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.062 | 0.032 48% | 0.056 10% | 0.07076 ? -14% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.042 | 0.057 -36% | 0.025 40% | 0.044 -5% | 0.04352 ? -4% |
| Score Read | 1057 | 767 -27% | 1488 41% | 522 -51% | 961 ? -9% |
| Score Write | 1542 | 945 -39% | 2033 32% | 1083 -30% | 1240 ? -20% |
| Score Total | 3097 | 2115 -32% | 4279 38% | 1901 -39% | 2671 ? -14% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -24% /
-24% | 32% /
33% | -6% /
-8% | 16% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3452 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1641 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
335.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
260 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2300 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1651 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
41.68 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
134.8 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3950 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13455 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2339 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (7.6 - 28, n=30) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW | |
| HP 15s-fq1556ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10.8 - 71, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (6.22 - 14, n=10) | |
| HP 15s-fq1556ng | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.9 - 130.6, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (13.4 - 27.8, n=11) | |
| HP 15s-fq1556ng | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 118.8 | 21.01 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 70.5 | 58.3 | 38.8 | 36.2 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 22.96 | 11.42 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 26.3 | 19.4 | 16.3 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.6 / 29.6 / 29.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 30.6 / 33.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.6 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.5 °C / 90.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.5 °C / 90.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.37 / 0.62 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5.2 / 8.8 / 10.2 Watt |
| Carga |
37.5 / 50.9 Watt |
   
| |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY R5 3500U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW R5 3500U, Vega 8, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkBook 15 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP 15s-fq1556ng i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 22% | 9% | 26% | 24% | 0% | -9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.2 | 3.7 29% | 3.5 33% | 3.3 37% | 3.7 29% | 5.68 ? -9% | 4.9 ? 6% |
| Idle Average * | 8.8 | 6.2 30% | 7.1 19% | 6.4 27% | 6.9 22% | 8.75 ? 1% | 8.36 ? 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.2 | 8.4 18% | 7.8 24% | 6.8 33% | 8.4 18% | 10.1 ? 1% | 10.4 ? -2% |
| Load Average * | 37.5 | 31.1 17% | 38.9 -4% | 29 23% | 32 15% | 37.8 ? -1% | 45.9 ? -22% |
| Load Maximum * | 50.9 | 43.1 15% | 65.4 -28% | 46 10% | 32.6 36% | 46.2 ? 9% | 66 ? -30% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY R5 3500U, Vega 8, 42 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW R5 3500U, Vega 8, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 15 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | HP 15s-fq1556ng i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 41 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 36% | 1% | 8% | 50% | 44% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 470 | 466 -1% | 406 -14% | 357 -24% | 597 27% | 629 ? 34% |
| Load | 75 | 130 73% | 87 16% | 104 39% | 129 72% | 115.4 ? 54% |
Pro
+ Muito bom desempenho da CPU sem afogamentos
+ Chassi rígido
+ Slot SATA
+ Wi-Fi rápido
Contra
- Porta USB Type-C ocupada durante o carregamento
- As teclas home e fim estão faltando
- Sem retro-iluminação de teclado
- RAM não expansível
Veredicto - Uma CPU de portátil deveria funcionar assim
Com o MateBook D 15, a Huawei obteve sucesso onde muitos outros fabricantes falham por um grande número de razões. A CPU do D 15 não se afoga mesmo quando está funcionando com a energia da bateria. Aqui, o processador continuará funcionando a toda velocidade até a bateria acabar. Por isso, o consumo de energia aumentou um pouco. No entanto, por que você compraria um processador poderoso se nunca pretendeu usá-lo? Além disso, a Huawei implementou uma solução de refrigeração adaptada especificamente a esse tipo de hardware, e é por isso que o sistema produz tão pouco ruído.
O Huawei MateBook D 15 oferece uma CPU que não se afoga e produz muito pouco ruído do ventilador.
O restante do hardware é bastante padrão e a única coisa que podemos criticar é o teclado. É adequado para longas sessões de digitação, mas aqueles que costumam usar as teclas "home" e "fim" sentirão muita falta delas. Além disso, também esperávamos ver pelo menos uma simples luz de fundo do teclado com um dispositivo como este. No final das contas, os compradores que estão no mercado por um portátil fino e poderoso não ficarão desapontados com o Huawei MateBook D 15.
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
-
03/05/2020 v7
Mike Wobker
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado