Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Lenovo ThinkPad P53: Workstation clássico com muito desempenho da GPU
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.8 % | 11/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE i7-9850H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | 2.7 kg | 29.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.8 % | 08/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop) | 1.7 kg | 18.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.9 % | 11/2018 | Dell Precision 7530 i9-8950HK, Quadro P3200 | 2.6 kg | 29.95 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 85.6 % | Fujitsu Celsius H780 i7-8850H, Quadro P2000 | 2.8 kg | 31.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 85 % | 06/2019 | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Precision 7530 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H780 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Workstation (54.8 - 200, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 7530 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H780 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Workstation (78.6 - 226, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| Dell Precision 7530 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H780 | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE | |
| Dell Precision 7530 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H780 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 490 cd/m²
Contraste: 1417:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
93.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE N156HCE-GN1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 N156HCE-EN1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE N156HCE-GN1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell Precision 7530 Sharp LQ156D1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Fujitsu Celsius H780 LP156WF6-SPP1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 AU Optronics AUO41EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -1% | 29% | -2% | 32% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.2 | 65.6 4% | 62.4 -1% | 82.5 31% | 66.3 5% | 84.4 34% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.9 | 90.3 -3% | 91.5 -2% | 99.4 7% | 85.9 -8% | 100 8% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.3 | 65.9 2% | 63.4 -1% | 96.2 50% | 62.8 -2% | 98.5 53% |
| Response Times | -3% | 18% | -32% | -8% | -28% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38.4 ? | 39.2 ? -2% | 34.4 ? 10% | 35.2 ? 8% | 38 ? 1% | 51 ? -33% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25.2 ? | 26 ? -3% | 14 ? 44% | 26.4 ? -5% | 26.8 ? -6% | 31 ? -23% |
| PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 25250 ? -3% | 26040 ? 0% | 198.4 ? -99% | 20830 ? -20% | |
| Screen | -34% | -15% | -31% | -36% | -23% | |
| Brightness middle | 510 | 304 -40% | 542 6% | 292.8 -43% | 271 -47% | 445 -13% |
| Brightness | 468 | 293 -37% | 528 13% | 295 -37% | 260 -44% | 462 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 88 -1% | 84 -6% | 85 -4% | 86 -3% | 83 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.26 28% | 0.41 -14% | 0.36 -0% | 0.29 19% | 0.5 -39% |
| Contrast | 1417 | 1169 -18% | 1322 -7% | 813 -43% | 934 -34% | 890 -37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 4.5 -96% | 3.5 -52% | 3.48 -51% | 3.9 -70% | 4.75 -107% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.5 | 7.7 -40% | 7.8 -42% | 6.81 -24% | 10.2 -85% | 7.79 -42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.2 | 2.4 -100% | 1.3 -8% | 3.13 -161% | 2.9 -142% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 5.2 -63% | 4.8 -50% | 4.1 -28% | 2.6 19% | 4.49 -40% |
| Gamma | 2.34 94% | 2.26 97% | 2.33 94% | 2.2 100% | 2.29 96% | 2.49 88% |
| CCT | 7036 92% | 6789 96% | 7690 85% | 6740 96% | 6517 100% | 7374 88% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.4 | 53.8 -9% | 58.8 -1% | 84.4 42% | 56.1 -6% | 87 46% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93.1 | 90.1 -3% | 91.1 -2% | 99.6 7% | 85.8 -8% | 100 7% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -12% /
-23% | 1% /
-7% | -11% /
-21% | -15% /
-25% | -6% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26040 Hz | ≤ 77 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 77 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 10 | |
| Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE | |
| Dell Precision 7530 | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H780 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 | |
| Essentials | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| Dell Precision 7530 | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H780 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 | |
| Productivity | |
| Dell Precision 7530 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H780 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| Digital Content Creation | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE | |
| Dell Precision 7530 | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H780 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (24156 - 28524, n=9) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE | |
| MSI WS75 9TL-636 | |
| Average of class Workstation (7432 - 54334, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| Dell Precision 7530 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H780 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (18247 - 21115, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE | |
| MSI WS75 9TL-636 | |
| Average of class Workstation (4816 - 35868, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| Dell Precision 7530 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H780 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (6999 - 7977, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE | |
| MSI WS75 9TL-636 | |
| Average of class Workstation (1882 - 16218, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Precision 7530 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | |
| Room GPUs-only | |
| MSI WS75 9TL-636 | |
| Dell Precision 7530 | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (1972 - 2008, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE | |
| Average of class Workstation (510 - 2981, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H780 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 | |
| Sala GPUs-only | |
| MSI WS75 9TL-636 | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q (4913 - 5053, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE | |
| Dell Precision 7530 | |
| Average of class Workstation (981 - 6323, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| Fujitsu Celsius H780 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 38739 pontos | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 54153 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 19250 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 98630 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 38066 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 16547 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6879 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
| GTA V (2015) | 177 | 170 | 150.4 | 77.6 | 68.4 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 320 | 235 | 141 | 71 | 46.4 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 148 | 137 | 132 | 126 | 102 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 281.4 | 198.6 | 134.5 | 110.1 | 45.4 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 117 | 99 | 85 | |||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 127 | 102 | 98 | 87 | 59 | 29 |
| Hitman 2 (2018) | 87.7 | 85.3 | 78.4 | 75.3 | 73.3 | 46.6 |
| Battlefield V (2018) | 153.6 | 105.4 | 88.2 | 81.2 | 68.3 | 42.5 |
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 107 | 98 | 90 | 86 | 72 | 43 |
| Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 275 | 188.9 | 160.3 | 89.3 | 66.8 | |
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 94.5 | 97.8 | 73.9 | 38.9 | 31.5 | |
| F1 2019 (2019) | 113 | 101 | 93 | 88 | 83 | 52 |
| Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 127 | 105 | 93 | 65 | 47 | 26 |
| GRID 2019 (2019) | 178.8 | 155.6 | 118.5 | 79.2 | 61.4 | 36.8 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.3 / 28.3 / 28.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 29.8 / 38.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9850H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Dell Precision 7530 Quadro P3200, i9-8950HK, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Fujitsu Celsius H780 Quadro P2000, i7-8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | -12% | -20% | -18% | -3% | |
| off / environment * | 28.3 | 28.8 -2% | 28.3 -0% | 29.6 -5% | 30.2 -7% | 29.5 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.3 | 28.8 -2% | 28.3 -0% | 29.6 -5% | 32.8 -16% | 29.5 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 28.3 | 28.8 -2% | 28.3 -0% | 32.2 -14% | 32.8 -16% | 29.5 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.3 | 28.8 -2% | 30.5 -8% | 37 -31% | 33.6 -19% | 29.5 -4% |
| Load Average * | 29.8 | 36.1 -21% | 34.5 -16% | 40.3 -35% | 40.9 -37% | 34.7 -16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.3 | 49.5 -29% | 33.1 14% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 38.3 | 36.7 4% | 49.5 -29% | 49.4 -29% | 42.7 -11% | 39.4 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.9 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.1 °C / 98.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-9.3 °C / -16.8 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Precision 7530 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.13 / 0.26 Watt |
| Ocioso | 7.9 / 11.8 / 14.9 Watt |
| Carga |
96 / 207.8 Watt |
   
| |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE i7-9850H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell Precision 7530 i9-8950HK, Quadro P3200, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Fujitsu Celsius H780 i7-8850H, Quadro P2000, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -20% | -40% | 3% | -22% | 35% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.9 | 13.7 -73% | 15.7 -99% | 9.1 -15% | 9.4 -19% | 4.02 49% |
| Idle Average * | 11.8 | 17.5 -48% | 20.3 -72% | 13.2 -12% | 17.4 -47% | 7.2 39% |
| Idle Maximum * | 14.9 | 20.9 -40% | 25.7 -72% | 14.04 6% | 19.6 -32% | 11.46 23% |
| Load Average * | 96 | 77.2 20% | 118.9 -24% | 78.8 18% | 103 -7% | 76.3 21% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 149 | 131.2 12% | 74 50% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 207.8 | 123.7 40% | 174 16% | 172.5 17% | 216 -4% | 154 26% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE i7-9850H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, 90 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 80 Wh | Dell Precision 7530 i9-8950HK, Quadro P3200, 97 Wh | Fujitsu Celsius H780 i7-8850H, Quadro P2000, 96 Wh | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, 96 Wh | Average of class Workstation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -19% | -39% | -32% | -45% | -4% | -9% | |
| H.264 | 590 | 560 -5% | 733 24% | 717 ? 22% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 664 | 532 -20% | 278 -58% | 450 -32% | 357 -46% | 637 -4% | 541 ? -19% |
| Load | 117 | 79 -32% | 95 -19% | 65 -44% | 79 -32% | 81.3 ? -31% | |
| Reader / Idle | 382 | 577 | 1519 | 700 ? |
Pro
Contra
O ThinkPad P53 ainda é um workstation móvel tradicional que não presta muita atenção às tendências atuais de carcaças e marcos cada vez mais finos. Como resultado, no entanto, a carcaça é muito robusta, existem muitas portas, a atualização é facilmente possível e o hardware é muito poderoso, principalmente no departamento de gráficos.
No exterior, pouco mudou em comparação com o ThinkPad P52 do ano anterior, mas houve algumas mudanças. Os principais pontos de venda são as placas gráficas mais poderosas (Quadro RTX 4000 e 5000), que geralmente estão reservadas para workstations maiores de 17 polegadas. Aqui, algumas críticas são justificadas, uma vez que os clientes não sabem qual versão da placa gráfica devem esperar. Nem a Nvidia nem a Lenovo afirmam que a versão mais lenta de 80 watts está embutida no sistema. A Lenovo provavelmente também conta com a variante mais lenta do RTX 4000. Em suma, o desempenho gráfico ainda é impressionante, independentemente.
Painel 1080p brilhante, excelentes dispositivos de entrada e uma tonelada de desempenho: O ThinkPad P53 é um produto muito completo, sem fragilidades reais. A única coisa que podemos criticar é a solução de refrigeração que poderia ser um pouco melhor, otimizada para cargas combinadas de CPU e GPU.
A solução de refrigeração também não é perfeita. Gostamos do controle defensivo do ventilador, que impede que os ventiladores girem, mesmo após curtos períodos de estresse. No entanto, a solução de refrigeração não consegue acompanhar as cargas combinadas de CPU e GPU, resultando em desempenho reduzido do processador. Embora os ventiladores silenciosos sejam bons, os usuários que optam por componentes de gama alta nesta faixa de preço, provavelmente desejam que eles possam liberar seu potencial máximo. Estamos convencidos de que a solução de resfriamento é capaz de ser mais eficaz, mesmo que resulte em mais ruído do ventilador. Podemos apenas adivinhar quão bem se desempenham outras configurações do P53 neste momento. Esperamos que os modelos com GPUs menores em particular (como as séries RTX 3000 ou T) façam melhor uso da CPU.
Semelhante a muitos ThinkPads atuais, o P53 da Lenovo recebeu atualizações significativas para opções de telas. Embora a configuração básica ainda inclua um painel IPS com 300 cd/m², agora está disponível um modelo 1080p melhor e mais brilhante. Além disso, a Lenovo oferece duas telas de alta resolução (um painel 4K IPS ou 4K OLED), o que garante que todos os usuários encontrem o modelo que estão procurando.
Essas críticas são um tanto minuciosas, já que o ThinkPad P53 não possui nenhuma fraqueza real e merece sua boa pontuação geral.
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
-
11/14/2019 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Pricecompare
