Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Workstation Dell Precision 7530 (i9-8950HK, Quadro P3200)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Precision 7530 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 3530 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 3530 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 7530 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 292.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 813:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.48 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 3.13
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
84.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
96.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
| Dell Precision 7530 Sharp LQ156D1, IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS B156ZAN03.2, IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160 | Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 Sharp SHP148D, IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160 | Dell Precision 3530 BOE BOE06F1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA CMN15E7, IPS LED, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Eurocom Tornado F5W AUO52ED B156HTN05.2, TN, 15.60, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | 5% | -15% | -46% | -22% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 82.5 | 86.4 5% | 91.2 11% | 72.8 -12% | 43.05 -48% | 66.1 -20% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 99.9 1% | 99.9 1% | 94.6 -5% | 64.7 -35% | 87.7 -12% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 96.2 | 99.1 3% | 99.4 3% | 69.3 -28% | 44.5 -54% | 64.2 -33% |
| Response Times | -38% | 105% | 128% | 4287% | 51% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.2 ? | 55.6 ? -58% | 49.6 ? -41% | 40.4 ? -15% | 41.6 ? -18% | 23.2 ? 34% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26.4 ? | 30.8 ? -17% | 37.6 ? -42% | 34.8 ? -32% | 28.8 ? -9% | 8.5 ? 68% |
| PWM Frequency | 198.4 ? | 990 ? 399% | 1053 ? 431% | 25770 ? 12889% | ||
| Screen | 5% | 14% | -16% | -22% | -53% | |
| Brightness middle | 292.8 | 397.6 36% | 430.9 47% | 285.7 -2% | 229 -22% | 405.7 39% |
| Brightness | 295 | 396 34% | 398 35% | 275 -7% | 212 -28% | 397 35% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 85 0% | 79 -7% | 85 0% | 88 4% | 92 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.25 31% | 0.35 3% | 0.31 14% | 0.23 36% | 0.65 -81% |
| Contrast | 813 | 1590 96% | 1231 51% | 922 13% | 996 23% | 624 -23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.48 | 4.95 -42% | 3.29 5% | 5.84 -68% | 4.2 -21% | 8.5 -144% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.81 | 10.23 -50% | 7.46 -10% | 8.76 -29% | 18 -164% | 16.2 -138% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.13 | 4.22 -35% | 3.58 -14% | 3.14 -0% | 4.2 -34% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 5.1 -24% | 2.6 37% | 6.5 -59% | 2 51% | 11.6 -183% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.234 98% | 2.19 100% | 2.383 92% | 2.23 99% | 2.37 93% |
| CCT | 6740 96% | 7543 86% | 6870 95% | 7176 91% | 6292 103% | 10468 62% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 84.4 | 87.6 4% | 87.2 3% | 62 -27% | 41 -51% | 57 -32% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.6 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 94 -6% | 64.5 -35% | 87 -13% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
-1% | 41% /
28% | 32% /
10% | 1406% /
734% | -8% /
-33% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 198.4 Hz | ≤ 25 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
| Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-8950HK () | |
| Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5W | |
| Dell Precision 3530 | |
| Dell Precision 7530 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Precision 7530 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5W | |
| Dell Precision 3530 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5W | |
| Dell Precision 3530 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4200 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5568 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5738 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dell Precision 7530 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB | Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | Dell Precision 3530 SK hynix PC400 512 GB | Eurocom Tornado F5W Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 12% | 1% | 11% | 64% | -15% | |
| Write 4K | 105.9 | 108 2% | 128.9 22% | 113.6 7% | 211.4 100% | 98.8 -7% |
| Read 4K | 23.87 | 37.24 56% | 45.7 91% | 41.18 73% | 56.7 138% | 33.98 42% |
| Write Seq | 1542 | 1476 -4% | 635 -59% | 1417 -8% | 1983 29% | 395.7 -74% |
| Read Seq | 1916 | 1367 -29% | 2065 8% | 1896 -1% | 2841 48% | 2063 8% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 305.4 | 302.4 -1% | 336.6 10% | 355 16% | 571 87% | 352.3 15% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 358.4 | 375 5% | 393.6 10% | 404.3 13% | 606 69% | 281.8 -21% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1572 | 2433 55% | 662 -58% | 1411 -10% | 1986 26% | 355 -77% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3061 | 3493 14% | 2664 -13% | 3095 1% | 3467 13% | 2775 -9% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 361 | |||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 447.3 |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 24576 pontos | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 45851 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 14244 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 49190 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 30100 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10128 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3979 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5W | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (41.6 - 46.4, n=4) | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Dell Precision 7530 | |
| Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
| HP ZBook 15 G4-Y4E80AV | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 | |
| Dell Precision 3530 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 208.9 | 141 | 80.6 | 41.6 | 28.2 |
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 140 | 127 | 89 | 59 | 29 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 180.9 | 139.7 | 77.4 | 65.8 | 27.6 |
| Dell Precision 7530 i9-8950HK, Quadro P3200 | HP ZBook 15 G4-Y4E80AV E3-1535M v6, Quadro M2200 | Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) E3-1535M v5, Quadro M2000M | Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 i7-8750H, Quadro P1000 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS E-2176M, Quadro P2000 Max-Q | Eurocom Tornado F5W E3-1280 v5, Quadro P5000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | -3% | 6% | 3% | 0% | |
| off / environment * | 28.3 | 29.5 -4% | 28.2 -0% | 29.5 -4% | 28.3 -0% | 29.6 -5% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.3 | 29.5 -4% | 29.8 -5% | 29.5 -4% | 28.4 -0% | 31.2 -10% |
| Idle Average * | 28.3 | 29.5 -4% | 29.8 -5% | 29.5 -4% | 28.4 -0% | 31.2 -10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.5 | 30 2% | 31.2 -2% | 29.5 3% | 29.2 4% | 32.6 -7% |
| Load Average * | 34.5 | 39.5 -14% | 37.2 -8% | 34.7 -1% | 41.8 -21% | 32.6 6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.5 | 39.5 20% | 33.1 33% | 39.1 21% | 43.1 13% | |
| Load Maximum * | 49.5 | 36 27% | 49.4 -0% | 39.4 20% | 41.8 16% | 43.3 13% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.3 / 28.3 / 30.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 34.5 / 49.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.4 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.8 °C / 83.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-1 °C / -1.8 F).
Dell Precision 7530 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.6 / 0.8 Watt |
| Ocioso | 15.7 / 20.3 / 25.7 Watt |
| Carga |
118.9 / 174 Watt |
   
| |
| Dell Precision 7530 i9-8950HK, Quadro P3200, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS E-2176M, Quadro P2000 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 i7-8706G, WX Vega M GL, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) E3-1535M v5, Quadro M2000M, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512), IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA i5-8550U, Radeon Pro WX 3100, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus Strix GL504GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 40% | 43% | -16% | 64% | 14% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 15.7 | 7.1 55% | 7.4 53% | 23.9 -52% | 3.2 80% | 10 36% |
| Idle Average * | 20.3 | 14.4 29% | 12.4 39% | 28.9 -42% | 6.1 70% | 16.9 17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25.7 | 14.6 43% | 13.3 48% | 30 -17% | 9.7 62% | 21.1 18% |
| Load Average * | 118.9 | 93.9 21% | 79.2 33% | 95.2 20% | 62 48% | 112.4 5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 131.2 | 77.9 41% | 82.2 37% | 48 63% | 135.5 -3% | |
| Load Maximum * | 174 | 88.3 49% | 96.5 45% | 157.1 10% | 71 59% | 157.3 10% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Precision 7530 i9-8950HK, Quadro P3200, 97 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS E-2176M, Quadro P2000 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) E3-1535M v5, Quadro M2000M, 91 Wh | Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1 i7-8706G, WX Vega M GL, 75 Wh | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA i5-8550U, Radeon Pro WX 3100, 56 Wh | Eurocom Tornado F5W E3-1280 v5, Quadro P5000, 75.24 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 15% | -23% | 41% | 146% | -22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 382 | 268 -30% | 737 93% | 1301 241% | 284 -26% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 278 | 320 15% | 239 -14% | 435 56% | 514 85% | 242 -13% |
| Load | 95 | 70 -26% | 70 -26% | 200 111% | 70 -26% |
Pro
Contra
O Precision 7530 é um upgrade que vale a pena do 7510. É menor sem sacrificar a rigidez e carrega opções de CPU e GPU significativamente mais rápidas que os usuários de workstations de alto desempenho apreciarão. Seus recursos opcionais de WAN também oferecem uma vantagem sobre a concorrência.
Há um número razoável de desvantagens relacionadas a seus processadores e opções de conectividade. Em primeiro lugar, a CPU Core i9 funciona muito quente no sistema para se beneficiar adequadamente das altas velocidades do Turbo Boost. Como resultado, o desempenho é apenas marginalmente melhor que o mais econômico Core i7-8750H no melhor dos casos e como resultado recomendamos o i7-8750H ou inferiores. Também ficamos desapontados ao ver um desempenho reduzido com a bateria e sem opções Quadro P4000 ou superiores, considerando que este é o workstation móvel de 15 polegadas mais potente “do mundo” e o primeiro preparado para RV. O painel 4K mate e granulado e os ventiladores barulhentos durante o uso intenso, abalam ainda mais um sistema sólido.
Quanto à conectividade, certamente achamos que poderia oferecer mais do que apenas duas portas USB tipo A, quando o Precision 7510 mais antigo tem o dobro desse número. Se deixar passar essas desvantagens o Precision 7530 ainda é um passo para cima em estética e desempenho em relação com seus antecessores.
O Core i9 é um pouco demais para o Precision 7530. Para uma máquina mais balanceada, os usuários estariam melhor configurando-o com o Core i7-8750H ou Xeon E-2176M. Esta é uma usina bem construída de um workstation com opções de 128 GB de RAM não encontradas na maioria dos outros workstations atualmente no mercado.
Dell Precision 7530
-
10/25/2019 v7
Allen Ngo
Pricecompare
