snhb.queue.push(function(){ snhb.addAdditionalAdSlotsToRefresh(additionalAdSlots); }); googletag.enableServices(); }); nbc_pagecall();
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil ASUS ROG G703GXR: Um gamer de gama alta da velha escola

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/19/2019

Large chassis, high performance. O ASUS ROG G703GXR é um portátil substituto de desktop clássico para jogos que se concentra no desempenho e nos recursos. Continue lendo para descobrir como este dispositivo de 17,3 polegadas se compara aos concorrentes mais compactos.

Asus ROG G703GXR (G703 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1575 MHz, Memoría: 7000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 419.71, Optimus
Memória
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, 2 de 4 slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, G-sync, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB 
, + Seagate Firecuda ST1000LX015, 1 TB SSHD, 5400 RPM. Slots: 3x M.2-2280 & 1x 2,5 polegadas
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS
Conexões
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 fone, 1 microfone, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 48 x 425 x 319
Bateria
96 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2x 2W + 2x 4.5W, Teclado: Chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 2 fontes de alimentação de 280 W, escultura em metal, guia de início rápido, folheto de garantia, Diversas ferramentas do fabricante, McAfee LiveSafe trial, XSplit Gamecaster trial, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
4.65 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.686 kg
Preço
3900 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionBest Price
86%10/2019Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
4.7 kg48 mm17.3"1920x1080
83%09/2019Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
4.8 kg42 mm17.3"1920x1080
86%08/2019HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
3.3 kg27 mm17.3"1920x1080
86%05/2019MSI GE75 9SG
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
2.7 kg27.5 mm17.3"1920x1080

Size Comparison

425 mm 319 mm 48 mm 4.7 kg430 mm 299 mm 42 mm 4.8 kg405 mm 295 mm 27 mm 3.3 kg397 mm 268.5 mm 27.5 mm 2.7 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG G703GXR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 206, n=258)
91.9 MB/s ∼47% -53%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼39% -61%
MSI GE75 9SG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.14 MB/s ∼14% -86%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG G703GXR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
246 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=256)
110 MB/s ∼45% -55%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81 MB/s ∼33% -67%
MSI GE75 9SG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33.17 MB/s ∼13% -87%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
692 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
676 MBit/s ∼98%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
675 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
661 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1380, n=281)
609 MBit/s ∼88% -10%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
749 MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
729 MBit/s ∼97% +8%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
680 MBit/s ∼91% 0%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
677 MBit/s ∼90%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1160, n=281)
561 MBit/s ∼75% -17%
288
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
292
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
267
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 293 cd/m² Médio: 281.4 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 290 cd/m²
Contraste: 1450:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.77 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.46
ΔE Greyscale 5.83 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
Asus ROG G703GXR
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
AU Optronics B173HAN03.1 (AUO319D), IPS, 1920x1080
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
CMN175D, IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GE75 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, 1920x1080
Asus ROG G703GX
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
-77%
-82%
18%
6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
6.4 (3.4, 3)
16.8 (8.4, 8.4)
-163%
17.6 (8.4, 9.2)
-175%
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
-13%
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
-13%
Response Time Black / White *
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
11.6 (6, 5.6)
9%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
12%
6.6 (3.2, 3.4)
48%
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
25%
PWM Frequency
25510 (44)
26040 (10)
Screen
-10%
21%
18%
-4%
Brightness middle
290
288
-1%
360
24%
400.7
38%
296
2%
Brightness
281
271
-4%
342
22%
372
32%
279
-1%
Brightness Distribution
91
85
-7%
91
0%
89
-2%
85
-7%
Black Level *
0.2
0.2
-0%
0.26
-30%
0.34
-70%
0.25
-25%
Contrast
1450
1440
-1%
1385
-4%
1179
-19%
1184
-18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.77
5.79
-21%
1.91
60%
1.33
72%
4.77
-0%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.08
11.89
-31%
4.08
55%
3.51
61%
9.08
-0%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.46
1.89
-29%
0.78
47%
1.39
5%
1.46
-0%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.83
6.92
-19%
2.72
53%
1.3
78%
5.83
-0%
Gamma
2.47 89%
2.46 89%
2.37 93%
2.24 98%
2.47 89%
CCT
8076 80%
8433 77%
6692 97%
6735 97%
8076 80%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
60
2%
60
2%
58.2
-1%
60
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
92
0%
96
4%
92.1
0%
93
1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-44% / -20%
-31% / 5%
18% / 18%
1% / -3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.4 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9279 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450Tooltip
Asus ROG G703GXR Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1251 (1244.71-1256.04)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1224 (1159.08-1279)
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1291 (1278.24-1450)
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Core i9-9880H
467 Points ∼100% +10%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Intel Core i7-9750H
449 Points ∼96% +6%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
441 Points ∼94% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 509, n=54)
429 Points ∼92% +1%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
423 Points ∼91%
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
3712 Points ∼100% +19%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
3110 Points ∼84%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Core i9-9880H
2953 Points ∼80% -5%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Intel Core i7-9750H
2896 Points ∼78% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 4926, n=54)
2522 Points ∼68% -19%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Core i9-9880H
197 Points ∼100% +15%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points ∼96% +11%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Intel Core i7-9750H
185 Points ∼94% +8%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
171 Points ∼87%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=529)
157 Points ∼80% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points ∼100% +37%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
Intel Core i9-9880H
1450 Points ∼84% +15%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Intel Core i7-9750H
1279 Points ∼74% +2%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
1256 Points ∼73%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=532)
834 Points ∼48% -34%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
171 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1256 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
6558 Points ∼100% +13%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1014 (RAID 0)
6453 Points ∼98% +12%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6306 Points ∼96% +9%
Asus ROG G703GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5780 Points ∼88%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=226)
5228 Points ∼80% -10%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1014 (RAID 0)
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
MSI GE75 9SG
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
28%
24%
5%
Write 4K
99.28
115.3
16%
103.8
5%
116.1
17%
Read 4K
40.25
41.79
4%
41.67
4%
44.98
12%
Write Seq
2001
2841
42%
2639
32%
2370
18%
Read Seq
2107
2547
21%
2702
28%
1465
-30%
Write 4K Q32T1
348.3
498.6
43%
487.3
40%
337.5
-3%
Read 4K Q32T1
391.5
554.5
42%
555.1
42%
453.6
16%
Write Seq Q32T1
2003
3123
56%
2967
48%
2399
20%
Read Seq Q32T1
3482
3476
0%
3102
-11%
3087
-11%
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3482 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2003 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 391.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 348.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2107 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2001 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 40.25 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 99.28 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
24850 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
38299 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
20164 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
9526 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
5860 Points ∼100% +6%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
5582 Points ∼95% +1%
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
5543 Points ∼95%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
5538 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1097 - 5942, n=62)
3929 Points ∼67% -29%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
10607 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
10181 Points ∼96%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
9754 Points ∼92% -4%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
9480 Points ∼89% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=167)
5724 Points ∼54% -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
27319 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
25727 Points ∼94%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
24623 Points ∼90% -4%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
22820 Points ∼84% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=555)
11462 Points ∼42% -55%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
37768 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
35754 Points ∼95%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
34050 Points ∼90% -5%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
31826 Points ∼84% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=630)
13571 Points ∼36% -62%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110115120Tooltip
Asus ROG G703GXR GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; The Witcher 3: Ø98.7 (92-103)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1014 (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø107 (99-112)
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø94 (88-99)
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; The Witcher 3: Ø89.4 (84-96)
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H
105 (min: 86) fps ∼100% +8%
Asus ROG G703GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H
97.1 (min: 80) fps ∼92%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
95.3 fps ∼91% -2%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
91.7 (min: 76) fps ∼87% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=327)
50.2 fps ∼48% -48%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 165 97.1 fps
Fortnite (2018) 148 133 fps
Hitman 2 (2018) 76 73.1 fps
Anthem (2019) 96.9 91 fps
The Division 2 (2019) 116 92 fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 70 40.8 fps
Rage 2 (2019) 110 108 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 83 80 fps
Control (2019) 91.7 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 91.8 79.4 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 202 201 fps

Barulho

Ocioso
33 / 34 / 35 dB
Carga
38 / 54 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
MSI GE75 9SG
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-7%
-4%
3%
3%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.2
6%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=328)
2%
Idle Minimum *
33
30
9%
34
-3%
30.4
8%
31.4 (28 - 42, n=751)
5%
Idle Average *
34
34
-0%
35
-3%
30.4
11%
32.6 (28 - 46.6, n=751)
4%
Idle Maximum *
35
45
-29%
36
-3%
33.4
5%
34.7 (28 - 52, n=751)
1%
Load Average *
38
40
-5%
51
-34%
37.1
2%
40.8 (30.1 - 58, n=752)
-7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
57
-14%
47
6%
54.2
-8%
Load Maximum *
54
60
-11%
51
6%
56.4
-4%
48.1 (38.9 - 64.1, n=752)
11%

* ... smaller is better

 39 °C44 °C46 °C 
 38 °C40 °C37 °C 
 26 °C27 °C27 °C 
Máximo: 46 °C
Médio: 36 °C
49 °C44 °C47 °C
43 °C40 °C46 °C
28 °C28 °C28 °C
Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 39.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  46 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.8 °C / 3.2 F).
Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
MSI GE75 9SG
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
4%
-2%
-17%
0%
Maximum Upper Side *
46
37
20%
47
-2%
48.8
-6%
45.9 (28 - 68.8, n=718)
-0%
Maximum Bottom *
49
40
18%
54
-10%
52
-6%
49.6 (25.9 - 78, n=716)
-1%
Idle Upper Side *
31
34
-10%
32
-3%
36.2
-17%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=670)
1%
Idle Bottom *
32
36
-13%
30
6%
44.4
-39%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=668)
1%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.837.42541.542.83132.539.94031.839.1502838.16327.641.38034.645.510024.651.712525.960.316024.165.720021.463.625020.770.231519.97340018.777.350018.680.263018.180.880017.482.1100017.479.6125018.581.7160018.280.8200017.880.6250017.581.7315017.582.1400017.582.7500017.476.5630017.672.6800017.669.71000017.667.21250017.660.81600017.351.7SPL30.192.1N1.498median 17.8median 76.5Delta1.57.836.336.238.942.13231.829.529.828.730.127.532.626.731.925.636.324.248.328.257.624.654.823.560.92262.420.767.519.265.818.570.617.973.217.868.819.171.718.170.417.471.117.469.217.369.717.573.217.467.517.270.717.373.217.470.117.265.517.256.330.482.61.459median 17.9median 68.82.65.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG G703GXRAcer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG G703GXR audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 27 / 32 / 39 Watt
Carga midlight 124 / 338 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
MSI GE75 9SG
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
2%
11%
28%
28%
Idle Minimum *
27
28
-4%
26
4%
13.9
49%
19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=712)
28%
Idle Average *
32
34
-6%
29
9%
18.8
41%
24.9 (6.6 - 119, n=712)
22%
Idle Maximum *
39
45
-15%
38
3%
23.1
41%
30.1 (8.3 - 122, n=712)
23%
Load Average *
124
98
21%
106
15%
112.3
9%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=703)
16%
Load Maximum *
338
307
9%
287
15%
291.5
14%
172 (21.9 - 590, n=702)
49%
Witcher 3 ultra *
274
263
4%
228
17%
231
16%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
8h 04min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 07min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 01min
Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 96 Wh
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 72 Wh
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 70 Wh
MSI GE75 9SG
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 65 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-36%
-31%
-20%
-9%
Reader / Idle
484
213
-56%
250
-48%
349 (39 - 1174, n=674)
-28%
WiFi v1.3
367
168
-54%
196
-47%
294
-20%
259 (78 - 622, n=375)
-29%
Load
61
63
3%
63
3%
79 (18 - 202, n=640)
30%

Pro

+ G-Sync e NVIDIA Optimus comutáveis
+ Baia para quatro unidades
+ Fornecimento de energia constante
+ Um painel IPS decente com uma taxa de atualização de 144 Hz
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Veloz leitor de cartões
+ Muitas portas
+ Alto-falantes poderosos
+ Potente duração da bateria

Contra

- Nem todos os componentes internos são de fácil acesso
- Extremamente robusto e pesado
- Duas fontes de alimentação
The ASUS ROG G703GXR laptop review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.
The ASUS ROG G703GXR laptop review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

O Asus ROG G703GXR foi projetado para jogadores que jogam principalmente em casa.


O ROG G703GXR não é adequado para ser transportado e usado como um portátil para jogos devido ao seu tamanho e peso. No entanto, se você não tiver nenhum problema com um chassi robusto, o ROG G703GXR será um ótimo companheiro de jogos e não apresentará grandes falhas. Suas opções de manutenção poderiam ser melhores em nossa opinião, por exemplo, mas quaisquer queixas que tenhamos são menores.

A ASUS equipou o dispositivo com bons dispositivos de entrada e uma ampla seleção de portas, incluindo o Thunderbolt 3. Além disso, o ROG G703GXR possui uma tela IPS responsiva e de alto contraste. A escolha entre G-Sync para melhor qualidade de imagem e Optimus para melhor duração da bateria também merece elogios. Além disso, gostamos que o portátil possa manter o desempenho máximo da CPU e da GPU sob uso intenso. A ASUS também conseguiu um compromisso decente entre potência, temperatura e volume. No geral, o ROG G703GXR é um excelente portátil para jogos da velha escola.

Asus ROG G703GXR - 10/05/2019 v7
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
78 / 98 → 79%
Teclado
89%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
69 / 80 → 86%
Peso
42 / 10-66 → 57%
Bateria
69 / 95 → 73%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
97%
Desempenho da aplicação
92%
Temperatura
87 / 95 → 91%
Ruído
71 / 90 → 79%
Audio
84%
Médio
79%
86%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

ASUS ROG G703GXR
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil ASUS ROG G703GXR: Um gamer de gama alta da velha escola
Florian Glaser, 2019-10-19 (Update: 2019-10-21)