Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Zephyrus S17: Portátil fino e gigante para jogos com Painel de 300 Hz

17 polegadas, hardware apto para jogos, e compacto. A Asus deseja combinar essas características no Zephyrus S17. Com a RTX 2080 Super da Nvidia no design Max-Q e um poderoso Intel Core i7-10875H, os requisitos básicos são atendidos, e usando vários truques, é suposto que resfriamento suficiente seja garantido. Nossa análise esclarece se este conceito também funciona na prática.
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS (ROG Zephyrus S GX701 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 735 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, NVIDIA 442.80, Intel UHD Graphis 630
Memória
32 GB 
, DDR4-3200 dual channel
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Sharp SHP14DC, IPS, G-Sync, Brilhante: não, 300 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB 
, 890 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio combinada de 3,5 mm
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.7 x 399 x 272
Bateria
76 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 alto-falantes, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 240-Watts, fonte de alimentação de 65-Watts, Armoury Crate, GameFirst VI, GameVisual, Sonic Studio III, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.62 kg, Suprimento de energia: 615 g
Preço
3300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82.4 %
08/2020
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
2.6 kg18.7 mm17.30"1920x1080
87.4 %
06/2020
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.7 kg19.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
83.7 %
08/2020
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.3 kg18.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
84 %
05/2020
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
3 kg25.5 mm17.30"1920x1080
84.2 %
03/2020
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.6 kg20.5 mm17.30"1920x1080
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS

Size Comparison

412 mm 305 mm 25.5 mm 3 kg399.8 mm 295.5 mm 20.5 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 272 mm 18.7 mm 2.6 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.7 kg396 mm 259 mm 18.9 mm 2.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Left side: power, HDMI 2.0b, 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C (incl. DisplayPort 1.4), combined 3.5-mm audio
Left side: power, HDMI 2.0b, 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C (incl. DisplayPort 1.4), combined 3.5-mm audio
Right side: 2x USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A, 1x Thunderbolt 3 (incl. DisplayPort 1.4, Power Delivery 3.0), Kensington lock
Right side: 2x USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A, 1x Thunderbolt 3 (incl. DisplayPort 1.4, Power Delivery 3.0), Kensington lock
Front: no connections
Front: no connections
Back: no connections
Back: no connections
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1390 MBit/s
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1283 (1089min - 1413max) MBit/s -8%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1270 (1080min - 1388max) MBit/s -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s -16%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1260 MBit/s
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1182 (1085min - 1338max) MBit/s -6%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1177 (773min - 1353max) MBit/s -7%
348
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Sharp SHP14DC tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 348 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 310.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
iluminação: 76 %
iluminação com acumulador: 308 cd/m²
Contraste: 906:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.49 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.99
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
74% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
73.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
73.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.193
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Sharp SHP14DC, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Sharp LQ173M1JW05, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
AUO_B173HAN03, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display
-1%
2%
-10%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
73.6
72.2
-2%
75.6
3%
63.8
-13%
70.8
-4%
sRGB Coverage
99.7
98.5
-1%
99.8
0%
92.7
-7%
98.5
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
73.7
73
-1%
75.1
2%
65.3
-11%
72.2
-2%
Response Times
-16%
9%
-129%
-140%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
5 ?(2.2, 2.8)
5.6 ?(2.6, 3)
-12%
5 ?(2.2, 2.8)
-0%
16 ?(8, 8)
-220%
17.2 ?(8.8, 8.4)
-244%
Response Time Black / White *
8 ?(3.6, 4.4)
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
-20%
6.6 ?(2.6, 4)
17%
11 ?(6, 5)
-38%
10.8 ?(6, 4.8)
-35%
PWM Frequency
26320 ?(25)
Screen
-59%
-8%
-35%
13%
Brightness middle
308
328
6%
299.4
-3%
310
1%
384.2
25%
Brightness
310
329
6%
299
-4%
281
-9%
357
15%
Brightness Distribution
76
78
3%
84
11%
85
12%
90
18%
Black Level *
0.34
0.35
-3%
0.31
9%
0.31
9%
0.29
15%
Contrast
906
937
3%
966
7%
1000
10%
1325
46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.49
4.74
-218%
1.82
-22%
3.86
-159%
1.35
9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.97
8.99
-126%
3.91
2%
7.8
-96%
3.45
13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.99
2.12
-114%
1.59
-61%
1.42
-43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
6.8
-196%
2.7
-17%
4.48
-95%
1.2
48%
Gamma
2.193 100%
2.2 100%
2.18 101%
2.5 88%
2.23 99%
CCT
6981 93%
6446 101%
6837 95%
7542 86%
6580 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
74
64.8
-12%
67.1
-9%
60
-19%
65.5
-11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
98.6
3%
99.8
4%
93
-3%
98.5
3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-25% / -43%
1% / -4%
-58% / -43%
-43% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.2 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - CPUz
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - CPUz
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - CPUz
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - CPUz
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - GPUz
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 - HWInfo
09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1561 (1522.36-1646.36)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1362 (1352.68-1494.38)
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1620 (1596.04-1713.21)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1123 (1105.49-1224.89)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1640 (1625.22-1699.96)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=241, last 2 years)
266 Points +32%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (190 - 220, n=37)
204 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
202 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
200 Points -1%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
198 Points -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
195 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=242, last 2 years)
3024 Points +84%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1754 Points +7%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
1713 (1596.04min - 1713.21max) Points +4%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
1646 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1003 - 1833, n=38)
1554 Points -6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
1549 (1352.68min - 1494.38max) Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
1225 Points -26%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
389.5 Seconds * -39%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (259 - 535, n=30)
327 Seconds * -16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
324 Seconds * -15%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
281 Seconds *
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
280 Seconds * -0%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=235, last 2 years)
205 Seconds * +27%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=236, last 2 years)
6062 MIPS +15%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5071 - 5780, n=31)
5360 MIPS +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
5284 MIPS
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
5284 MIPS 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
5245 MIPS -1%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
5232 MIPS -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
4585 MIPS -13%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=236, last 2 years)
75363 MIPS +68%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
48397 MIPS +8%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
44947 MIPS
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
44947 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (29844 - 49562, n=31)
43117 MIPS -4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
33674 MIPS -25%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
33364 MIPS -26%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=237, last 2 years)
693 Points +50%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (430 - 524, n=32)
486 Points +5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
483 Points +5%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
478 Points +4%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
475 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
461 Points
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points -7%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=237, last 2 years)
7255 Points +85%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
4136 Points +6%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
3917 Points
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
3885 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1986 - 4176, n=32)
3455 Points -12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
3367 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
2738 Points -30%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2193, n=241, last 2 years)
1795 Points +37%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
1307 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1233 - 1371, n=29)
1304 Points 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
1278 Points -2%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
1271 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
1128 Points -14%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=241, last 2 years)
13326 Points +78%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
8363 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5715 - 8620, n=29)
7734 Points +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
7531 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
7474 Points
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
5909 Points -21%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=239, last 2 years)
20.8 fps +63%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.8 fps
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.8 fps 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (7.27 - 14.1, n=27)
11.7 fps -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
9.47 fps -26%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
57.8 s * -21%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (30.2 - 84.3, n=30)
50.3 s * -5%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
50.2 s * -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=233, last 2 years)
49.1 s * -3%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
47.7 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.676 sec * -16%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.589 sec * -1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.583 sec *
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (0.546 - 0.662, n=29)
0.582 sec * -0%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=236, last 2 years)
0.4734 sec * +19%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
202 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
136.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1646 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=202, last 2 years)
10701 Points +17%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
10064 Points +10%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
9933 Points +9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
9831 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (9118 - 9599, n=4)
9290 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9140 Points
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8827 Points -3%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (7244 - 11833, n=202, last 2 years)
9729 Points +16%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
8469 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8386 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
8253 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (7633 - 8386, n=4)
8106 Points -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
8028 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7749 Points -8%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=202, last 2 years)
11407 Points +125%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
9082 Points +79%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
8560 Points +69%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8240 Points +63%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (4747 - 7296, n=4)
6074 Points +20%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
5514 Points +9%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5069 Points
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5539 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (4166 - 6657, n=36, last 2 years)
5264 Points +13%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
5217 Points +12%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
4780 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4666 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (4375 - 4666, n=3)
4569 Points -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
4384 Points -6%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6370 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6317 Points -1%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
6191 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (5682 - 6370, n=3)
6131 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (4622 - 7085, n=35, last 2 years)
6098 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5949 Points -7%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
5818 Points -9%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4666 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6370 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
5231 pontos
Ajuda
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
1030 μs * -127%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
453 μs *
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
364 μs * +20%

* ... smaller is better

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Lite-On CA5-8D512
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
9%
18%
1%
4%
9%
Write 4K
120
119
-1%
177.9
48%
101.2
-16%
110.6
-8%
139.7 ?(76.2 - 229, n=36)
16%
Read 4K
45.24
51.9
15%
47.42
5%
44.61
-1%
41.46
-8%
49.9 ?(34.3 - 75.5, n=36)
10%
Write Seq
2090
2258
8%
2707
30%
2295
10%
2378
14%
2036 ?(776 - 2975, n=35)
-3%
Read Seq
2246
2283
2%
2369
5%
2174
-3%
2114
-6%
2014 ?(973 - 2639, n=35)
-10%
Write 4K Q32T1
392.5
491
25%
427.8
9%
401.2
2%
445.4
13%
461 ?(268 - 656, n=36)
17%
Read 4K Q32T1
348.4
540
55%
543
56%
475.5
36%
509
46%
499 ?(289 - 730, n=36)
43%
Write Seq Q32T1
3015
2253
-25%
2703
-10%
2397
-20%
2735
-9%
2903 ?(788 - 3033, n=36)
-4%
Read Seq Q32T1
3445
3172
-8%
3387
-2%
3337
-3%
3206
-7%
3479 ?(2853 - 3568, n=36)
1%
AS SSD
-60%
-13%
9%
-27%
13%
Seq Read
2744
2019
-26%
2327
-15%
2800
2%
1938
-29%
2553 ?(1938 - 3148, n=37)
-7%
Seq Write
1351
1314
-3%
2479
83%
2424
79%
2094
55%
2084 ?(1248 - 2837, n=37)
54%
4K Read
47.24
46.61
-1%
45.46
-4%
42.77
-9%
25.88
-45%
53.1 ?(44.3 - 68.4, n=37)
12%
4K Write
109.1
90.2
-17%
157.4
44%
94.8
-13%
100.8
-8%
131.2 ?(87.4 - 208, n=37)
20%
4K-64 Read
1118
665
-41%
1050
-6%
1406
26%
1217
9%
1477 ?(762 - 2093, n=37)
32%
4K-64 Write
1926
813
-58%
938
-51%
1697
-12%
1137
-41%
1805 ?(1074 - 2152, n=37)
-6%
Access Time Read *
0.064
0.058
9%
0.076
-19%
0.05
22%
0.051
20%
0.04983 ?(0.032 - 0.087, n=36)
22%
Access Time Write *
0.034
0.167
-391%
0.071
-109%
0.039
-15%
0.107
-215%
0.04222 ?(0.017 - 0.128, n=37)
-24%
Score Read
1439
913
-37%
1328
-8%
1729
20%
1437
0%
1786 ?(1078 - 2449, n=37)
24%
Score Write
2170
1034
-52%
1343
-38%
2034
-6%
1447
-33%
2144 ?(1471 - 2527, n=37)
-1%
Score Total
4283
2392
-44%
3366
-21%
4630
8%
3624
-15%
4826 ?(3309 - 6095, n=37)
13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-26% / -31%
3% / -0%
5% / 6%
-12% / -14%
11% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3445 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3015 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 348.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 392.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2246 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2090 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.24 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 120 MB/s

Constant Performance Reads: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=241, last 2 years)
39928 Points +21%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
32995 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (26292 - 32995, n=10)
29663 Points -10%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
29220 Points -11%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
27694 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
27203 Points -18%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
24066 Points -27%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=150, last 2 years)
135325 Points +5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
134255 Points +4%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
128974 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (101976 - 140750, n=7)
126108 Points -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
124815 Points -3%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
121539 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
114826 Points -11%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=245, last 2 years)
29195 Points +23%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
23649 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
22391 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (19655 - 23649, n=10)
21743 Points -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21191 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
18877 Points -20%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18517 Points -22%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=243, last 2 years)
11907 Points +34%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
8906 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8479 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (7372 - 8979, n=11)
8210 Points -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
8065 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7597 Points -15%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
7057 Points -21%
3DMark 11 Performance
25058 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
45467 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
19929 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
8883 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=238, last 2 years)
115.1 fps +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (74.3 - 96, n=11)
85.3 fps +3%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
82.6 (69min) fps
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
81 (72min - 91max) fps -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
80.9 (75min - 90max) fps -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
78 fps -6%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
67.5 (61min - 75max) fps -18%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=253, last 2 years)
100.8 fps +22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
85.3 fps +3%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
83.7 fps +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
82.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (76.8 - 87.6, n=6)
82 fps -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
81.6 fps -1%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Gaming
  (29.9 - 244, n=247, last 2 years)
150.6 fps +21%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
135 (117.7min) fps +9%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
133 (116min) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (117.4 - 139, n=6)
126.6 fps +2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
126.4 (110.3min) fps +2%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
124.2 (108min) fps
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=248, last 2 years)
141.2 fps +20%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
126 (108.2min) fps +7%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
126 (109.8min) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (115 - 128, n=6)
120 fps +2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
119.6 (103.2min) fps +2%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
117.7 (102.5min) fps
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 218, n=129, last 2 years)
125.8 fps +25%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
101 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (91 - 110, n=4)
101 fps 0%
Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
177.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (140 - 177.7, n=8)
155.7 fps -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (22.2 - 198.4, n=6, last 2 years)
142 fps -20%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=237, last 2 years)
109.6 fps +64%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (67 - 80.8, n=2)
73.9 fps +10%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
67 fps
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø83.3 (73-88)
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 82.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 146.6 135.8 124.2 117.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 67
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 114 97.6 82.8
Far Cry 5 (2018) 101
Doom Eternal (2020) 177.7

Barulho

Ocioso
32 / 35 / 43 dB
Carga
44 / 45 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.334.633.230.525.335.12537.535.733.630.935.9343136.234.829.926.334.226.24036.339.136.534.434.944.75039.635.734.731.331.537.56334.536.233.125.52534.88028.825.627.725.222.127.610024.62321.321.522.624.112528.623.425.418.717.928.21603226.628.32720.429.720030.129.830.523.315.829.72503021.625.419.613.928.33153021.425.72113.429.74003224.628.320.812.430.950030.924.827.720.612.330.363030.82227.619.911.130.280031.52329.922.410.931.6100031.622.62921.711.231.4125033.524.731.622.113.433.3160034.424.433.52111.734.3200035.424.833.621.311.835.4250035.324.533.820.912.334.8315036.224.934.820.712.735.5400033.620.831.31912.433.2500032.517.929.415.212.832.5630029.316.327.814.112.928.8800025.615.223.913.412.924.31000022.216.819.81412.819.51250020.215.617.713.912.716.81600018.313.514.513.41214.8SPL45.23543.432.124.644.8N52.24.21.60.64.8median 30.9median 23median 28.3median 20.7median 12.7median 30.2Delta3.52.83.52.70.94.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
 56 °C57 °C54 °C 
 49 °C52 °C46 °C 
 39 °C38 °C36 °C 
Máximo: 57 °C
Médio: 47.4 °C
50 °C50 °C51 °C
49 °C49 °C50 °C
42 °C43 °C42 °C
Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 47.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  54 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2025.330.12535.932.43134.233.34034.935.85031.536.7632533.58022.129.210022.63912517.958.516020.46420015.865.225013.967.331513.466.540012.469.550012.368.563011.172.180010.970.2100011.269.6125013.471160011.772.3200011.872.5250012.374315012.772400012.468.6500012.868.9630012.966.4800012.959.61000012.859.11250012.756.4160001250.9SPL24.682.5N0.656.8median 12.7median 68.5Delta0.96hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.6 / 2.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 10 / 16 / 29 Watt
Carga midlight 143 / 205 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-25%
-26%
-18%
-75%
-3%
-10%
Idle Minimum *
10
19.6
-96%
19.2
-92%
15.7
-57%
24.7
-147%
12.9 ?(9 - 23, n=8)
-29%
13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=184, last 2 years)
-38%
Idle Average *
16
21.7
-36%
22.4
-40%
26.3
-64%
35.9
-124%
17.3 ?(12.6 - 30, n=8)
-8%
19.1 ?(8 - 67, n=184, last 2 years)
-19%
Idle Maximum *
29
36.1
-24%
34.7
-20%
28
3%
69.6
-140%
26.9 ?(15.8 - 42, n=8)
7%
26.6 ?(9 - 101.1, n=184, last 2 years)
8%
Load Average *
143
115.6
19%
106.7
25%
136
5%
141.8
1%
123.9 ?(94.8 - 156, n=8)
13%
111 ?(32.1 - 202, n=184, last 2 years)
22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
146
157
-8%
160.5
-10%
160
-10%
185.8
-27%
Load Maximum *
205
219.9
-7%
248.7
-21%
177
14%
235.4
-15%
205 ?(169 - 216, n=8)
-0%
250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=183, last 2 years)
-22%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
3h 28min
WiFi Websurfing
2h 50min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 28min
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 76 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
74%
132%
-1%
37%
90%
Reader / Idle
208
513
147%
229
10%
426
105%
541 ?(57 - 1290, n=87, last 2 years)
160%
WiFi v1.3
170
296
74%
295
74%
178
5%
290
71%
364 ?(57 - 745, n=188, last 2 years)
114%
Load
88
243
176%
73
-17%
31
-65%
85.5 ?(36 - 173, n=150, last 2 years)
-3%

Pro

+ Muito bom desempenho de jogos
+ Taxas de quadros fluentes também no modo "silencioso"
+ Tela de 300-Hz oferece uma imagem atraente
+ Bom sistema de resfriamento

Contra

- Sem leitor de cartões de armazenamento
- Sem LAN Gigabit
- Pequeno touchpad

Veredicto - Um portátil moderno para jogos com muito desempenho

In review: Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS. Test unit provided by Asus Germany.
In review: Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS. Test unit provided by Asus Germany.

Após a compra do Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS, os usuários não precisam se preocupar com o desempenho do hardware de seu portátil por muito tempo. Isso é completamente suficiente para os jogos atuais, mesmo permitindo que eles sejam jogados no modo "Silencioso" significativamente menos barulhento, onde os ventiladores não soam como uma casa de máquinas. Em nossa opinião, o design de resfriamento da Asus funciona, e não fomos afetados negativamente na operação diária pelo reposicionamento resultante do teclado. No entanto, a leve abertura da parte inferior da carcaça quando a tampa é aberta cria uma impressão muito instável, de forma que gostaríamos de usar o Zephyrus S17 apenas em uma superfície fixa.

O Asus Zephyrus S17 oferece muito desempenho que também pode ser mantido por longos períodos devido ao sistema de resfriamento refinado.

No entanto, aqueles que desejam obter o desempenho máximo de seu Asus Zephyrus S17, mais cedo ou mais tarde, irão querer usar o modo "Turbo". Particularmente durante aplicativos 4K ou VR, os requisitos de desempenho serão significativamente maiores do que para os jogos de resolução Full HD que testamos aqui. Nós nos preocuparíamos menos com o desempenho constante do que com o nível de ruído. Quando os ventiladores aceleram, precisa de fones de ouvido para tudo. Mas como isso não é incomum para um portátil para jogos, o Asus Zephyrus S17 ainda deixa uma boa impressão geral.

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS - 08/16/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
80 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
77%
Mouse
69%
Conectividade
61 / 80 → 76%
Peso
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Bateria
51 / 95 → 54%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
96%
Desempenho da aplicação
92%
Temperatura
75 / 95 → 79%
Ruído
66 / 90 → 73%
Audio
89%
Médio
69%
82%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Zephyrus S17: Portátil fino e gigante para jogos com Painel de 300 Hz
Mike Wobker, 2020-08-18 (Update: 2020-08-22)