Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil MSI GS75 Stealth 10SF: Ótimo desempenho do Core i7-10875H
MSI GS75 10SF-609US (GS75 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 900 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, 451.67, Optimus
Memória
32 GB
, Samsung DDR4-3200, 22-22-22-52, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Sharp LQ173M1JW05, IPS, SHP14EC, 240 Hz, Brilhante: não, 240 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, 512 GB
peso
2.32 kg, Suprimento de energia: 868 g
Preço
2100 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.7 % | 08/2020 | MSI GS75 10SF-609US i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.3 kg | 18.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.4 % | 06/2020 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.5 % | 05/2020 | Aorus 17G XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87 % | 04/2020 | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.7 kg | 21 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
| 84.2 % | 03/2020 | Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.6 kg | 20.5 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.4 % | 08/2020 | Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.6 kg | 18.7 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Aorus 17G XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Aorus 17G XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1176 (773-1353)
MSI GS75 10SF-609US; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1270 (1080-1388)
9.3 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sharp LQ173M1JW05 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 324.3 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 299.2 cd/m² Minimum: 14.7 cd/m²iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 299.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 966:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.82 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.59
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
75.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
75.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US Sharp LQ173M1JW05, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080 | Aorus 17G XB AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D), IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080 | Alienware m17 R2 P41E Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080 | Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR AU Optronics B173HAN05.1, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080 | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.30, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -4% | -4% | -5% | 11% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 75.6 | 72.2 -4% | 70.6 -7% | 70.8 -6% | 70 -7% | 90.8 20% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 98.5 -1% | 97.2 -3% | 98.5 -1% | 96.6 -3% | 99.9 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 75.1 | 73 -3% | 72.8 -3% | 72.2 -4% | 72.3 -4% | 85.8 14% |
| Response Times | -29% | -151% | -154% | -14% | -25% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 5 ? | 5.6 ? -12% | 16 ? -220% | 17.2 ? -244% | 5.6 ? -12% | 7.8 ? -56% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 6.6 ? | 9.6 ? -45% | 12 ? -82% | 10.8 ? -64% | 7.6 ? -15% | 6.2 ? 6% |
| PWM Frequency | 26320 ? | 25510 ? | ||||
| Screen | -44% | 19% | 18% | 3% | -17% | |
| Brightness middle | 299.4 | 328 10% | 293 -2% | 384.2 28% | 288 -4% | 262 -12% |
| Brightness | 299 | 329 10% | 285 -5% | 357 19% | 276 -8% | 261 -13% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 78 -7% | 95 13% | 90 7% | 93 11% | 94 12% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.35 -13% | 0.24 23% | 0.29 6% | 0.24 23% | 0.2 35% |
| Contrast | 966 | 937 -3% | 1221 26% | 1325 37% | 1200 24% | 1310 36% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.82 | 4.74 -160% | 1.27 30% | 1.35 26% | 1.92 -5% | 3.96 -118% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.91 | 8.99 -130% | 2.24 43% | 3.45 12% | 4.57 -17% | 7.29 -86% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.59 | 2.12 -33% | 1.06 33% | 1.42 11% | 1.14 28% | 2.18 -37% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 6.8 -152% | 1.34 50% | 1.2 56% | 3.08 -14% | 3.09 -14% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.2 100% | 2.38 92% | 2.23 99% | 2.42 91% | 2.48 89% |
| CCT | 6837 95% | 6446 101% | 6542 99% | 6580 99% | 7055 92% | 6977 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 67.1 | 64.8 -3% | 73 9% | 65.5 -2% | 65 -3% | 76 13% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.8 | 98.6 -1% | 94 -6% | 98.5 -1% | 96 -4% | 100 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -25% /
-34% | -45% /
-6% | -47% /
-8% | -5% /
-1% | -10% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1620 (1596.04-1713.21)
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Micron 2200S 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TCK; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1366 (1339.18-1451.59)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1362 (1352.68-1494.38)
Aorus 17G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1613 (1597.83-1832.68)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1986 - 4176, n=32) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10875H (430 - 524, n=32) | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1003 - 1833, n=38) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10875H (190 - 220, n=37) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10875H (259 - 535, n=30) | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5071 - 5780, n=31) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10875H (29844 - 49562, n=31) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1233 - 1371, n=29) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5715 - 8620, n=29) | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10875H (7.27 - 14.1, n=27) | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10875H (30.2 - 84.3, n=30) | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10875H (0.546 - 0.662, n=29) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (4388 - 5217, n=3) | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (5551 - 6317, n=3) | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4780 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6191 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6582 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| Aorus 17G XB | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Lite-On CA5-8D512 | Aorus 17G XB Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Alienware m17 R2 P41E 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0) | Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -30% | 29% | -9% | 8% | -10% | |
| Seq Read | 2327 | 2019 -13% | 1791 -23% | 1938 -17% | 1662 -29% | 1749 -25% |
| Seq Write | 2479 | 1314 -47% | 2193 -12% | 2094 -16% | 2266 -9% | 1173 -53% |
| 4K Read | 45.46 | 46.61 3% | 50.7 12% | 25.88 -43% | 46.86 3% | 42.81 -6% |
| 4K Write | 157.4 | 90.2 -43% | 116.8 -26% | 100.8 -36% | 101.1 -36% | 98.4 -37% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1050 | 665 -37% | 1525 45% | 1217 16% | 1419 35% | 1238 18% |
| 4K-64 Write | 938 | 813 -13% | 1958 109% | 1137 21% | 1746 86% | 691 -26% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.076 | 0.058 24% | 0.07 8% | 0.051 33% | 0.047 38% | 0.077 -1% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.071 | 0.167 -135% | 0.032 55% | 0.107 -51% | 0.037 48% | 0.038 46% |
| Score Read | 1328 | 913 -31% | 1755 32% | 1437 8% | 1632 23% | 1456 10% |
| Score Write | 1343 | 1034 -23% | 2294 71% | 1447 8% | 2074 54% | 906 -33% |
| Score Total | 3366 | 2392 -29% | 4972 48% | 3624 8% | 4576 36% | 3083 -8% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 3092 | 1715 -45% | 1926 -38% | 1398 -55% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 733 | 622 -15% | 626 -15% | 438.9 -40% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1683 | 1506 -11% | 1533 -9% | 996 -41% | ||
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -7% | -3% | -10% | -29% | -38% | |
| Write 4K | 177.9 | 119 -33% | 123.4 -31% | 110.6 -38% | 96.1 -46% | 90.1 -49% |
| Read 4K | 47.42 | 51.9 9% | 45.02 -5% | 41.46 -13% | 40.86 -14% | 39.07 -18% |
| Write Seq | 2707 | 2258 -17% | 2526 -7% | 2378 -12% | 1317 -51% | 1192 -56% |
| Read Seq | 2369 | 2283 -4% | 2062 -13% | 2114 -11% | 1030 -57% | 1135 -52% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 427.8 | 491 15% | 497.9 16% | 445.4 4% | 350.4 -18% | 290.9 -32% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 543 | 540 -1% | 579 7% | 509 -6% | 404.1 -26% | 343.9 -37% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2703 | 2253 -17% | 2982 10% | 2735 1% | 2396 -11% | 1194 -56% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3387 | 3172 -6% | 3440 2% | 3206 -5% | 3194 -6% | 3199 -6% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -19% /
-21% | 13% /
16% | -10% /
-10% | -11% /
-5% | -24% /
-22% |
* ... smaller is better
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3387 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2703 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
543 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
427.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2369 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2707 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
47.42 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
177.9 MB/s
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
| MSI RTX 2070 Gaming Z 8G | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| Aorus 17G XB | |
| MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
| Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (14723 - 27694, n=31) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
| Aorus 17G XB | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
| MSI RTX 2070 Gaming Z 8G | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
| Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (9107 - 17603, n=30) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB | |
| Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 22303 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 51136 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17066 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7392 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G: Ø64.2 (60-71)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 349.7 | 231.3 | 131.3 | 67.5 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 164 | 141 | 133 | 126 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 112 | 100 | 83.7 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 161 | 110 | 98 | 89 |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512 | Aorus 17G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0) | Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 6% | -5% | 3% | 2% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 26.2 | 28.2 -8% | 30 -15% | 29.1 -11% | 30 -15% | 30 -15% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31.2 | 28.2 10% | 35 -12% | 29.4 6% | 32 -3% | 30 4% |
| Idle Average * | 31.4 | 28.2 10% | 36 -15% | 29.4 6% | 33 -5% | 34 -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 34 | 30.5 10% | 41 -21% | 31.5 7% | 34 -0% | 36 -6% |
| Load Average * | 49.5 | 42.2 15% | 47 5% | 49.7 -0% | 40 19% | 43 13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.6 | 53 -5% | 48 5% | 49.5 2% | 49 3% | 45 11% |
| Load Maximum * | 60.7 | 55.5 9% | 49 19% | 53.3 12% | 50 18% | 45 26% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.2 / 31.4 / 34 dB |
| Carga |
| 49.5 / 60.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 26.2 dB(A) | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.8 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.6 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.9 °C / -8.8 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.8 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.6 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.9 °C / -8.8 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GS75 10SF-609US audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 1 / 1.24 Watt |
| Ocioso | 19.2 / 22.4 / 34.7 Watt |
| Carga |
106.7 / 248.7 Watt |
   
| |
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Lite-On CA5-8D512, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Aorus 17G XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN, 1920x1080, 17.30 | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | -2% | -14% | 28% | 17% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 19.2 | 19.6 -2% | 20 -4% | 32 -67% | 8 58% | 13 32% |
| Idle Average * | 22.4 | 21.7 3% | 23 -3% | 34 -52% | 14 37% | 17 24% |
| Idle Maximum * | 34.7 | 36.1 -4% | 38 -10% | 36 -4% | 22 37% | 25 28% |
| Load Average * | 106.7 | 115.6 -8% | 105 2% | 95 11% | 92 14% | 96 10% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 160.5 | 157 2% | 158 2% | 155 3% | 154 4% | 156 3% |
| Load Maximum * | 248.7 | 219.9 12% | 243 2% | 187 25% | 207 17% | 239 4% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI GS75 10SF-609US i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Aorus 17G XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh | Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 51 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 0% | 8% | -35% | -54% | -47% | |
| Reader / Idle | 513 | 598 17% | 426 -17% | 246 -52% | 346 -33% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 295 | 296 0% | 450 53% | 290 -2% | 182 -38% | 200 -32% |
| Load | 243 | 134 -45% | 31 -87% | 69 -72% | 60 -75% |
Pro
+ Painel IPS de 240 Hz de alta qualidade com cobertura sRGB completa
+ WLAN acessível e 2 slots M.2 2280 de armazenamento
+ Tempos de resposta rápidos da tela; ghosting mínimo
+ Muito leve para o tamanho e desempenho
+ Muito silencioso quando está sob uso leve
+ Teclas QWERTY confortáveis
+ Pode carregar via USB-C
+ Sem problemas de latência de DPC
+ Alto-falantes fortes
Contra
- O chassi poderia ser mais rígido e forte
- Os slots RAM requerem desmontagem adicional
- Leitor de cartões MicroSD em vez do de tamanho completo
- Ventiladores barulhentos durante os jogos
- Teclas numéricas esponjosas
- Sem obturador na webcam
A maior fortaleza do GS75 é o seu alto desempenho por peso. Você não encontrará outro portátil para jogos de 17,3 polegadas com Core i9 e gráficos GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q que são tão leves quanto o nosso MSI.
No entanto, a maior vantagem do sistema está diretamente ligada à sua maior desvantagem. Por ser tão leve, o chassi se dobra, range e flexiona mais do que a maioria dos outros portáteis para jogos, como o Razer Blade Pro ou o Alienware m17. Você provavelmente vai querer um mochila de alta qualidade, se pretende viajar muito com o sistema.
Quanto às novas opções de CPU e GPU, o Core i9 e o RTX 2070 Super Max-Q oferecem melhorias apenas marginais em relação ao Core i7-10875H e RTX 2070 Max-Q, respectivamente. Os usuários obterão melhor desempenho por dólar aderindo à nossa configuração de Core i7 e RTX 2070 Max-Q aqui ou fazendo todo o possível para o RTX 2080 Super Max-Q.
Se você viaja muito, o leve MSI GS75 parecerá uma oferta atraente, especialmente considerando o hardware de última geração. Se você estiver trabalhando ou jogando principalmente em ambientes fechados ou em escritórios, outras opções estarão disponíveis com designs de chassi mais rígidos.
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
-
07/29/2020 v7
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Pricecompare
