Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1050 Ti)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 75 %
iluminação com acumulador: 288.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 961:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.09
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T N156HCE-EN1 (CMN15E8), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 Chi Mei CMN N156HCE-EN1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160 | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) IGZO IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160 | Microsoft Surface Book 2 Panasonic MEI96A2 , IPS, 13.50, 3000x2000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -23% | 35% | 6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.3 | 65 1% | 48.21 -25% | 89.7 40% | 67.9 6% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90.4 | 90.8 0% | 72.6 -20% | 100 11% | 95.7 6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.3 | 65.8 1% | 49.81 -24% | 100 53% | 69.4 6% |
| Response Times | 17% | -11% | -49% | -7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.2 ? | 29.6 ? 31% | 28 ? 35% | 57.2 ? -32% | 52.8 ? -22% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32.8 ? | 26.4 ? 20% | 23.6 ? 28% | 39.2 ? -20% | 30 ? 9% |
| PWM Frequency | 25510 ? | 25510 ? 0% | 1351 ? -95% | 962 -96% | |
| Screen | 12% | -20% | 18% | 44% | |
| Brightness middle | 288.2 | 300.9 4% | 274.2 -5% | 370.1 28% | 385 34% |
| Brightness | 266 | 285 7% | 263 -1% | 356 34% | 372 40% |
| Brightness Distribution | 75 | 92 23% | 92 23% | 87 16% | 89 19% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.24 20% | 0.44 -47% | 0.37 -23% | 0.21 30% |
| Contrast | 961 | 1254 30% | 623 -35% | 1000 4% | 1833 91% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 5 9% | 8 -45% | 5.3 4% | 1.6 71% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.3 | 10.2 10% | 14.6 -29% | 9.9 12% | 4.5 60% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.9 | 7 11% | 9.1 -15% | 4.6 42% | 1.5 81% |
| Gamma | 2.09 105% | 2.34 94% | 2.24 98% | 2.31 95% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6559 99% | 6578 99% | 5020 129% | 6284 103% | 6502 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.5 | 59 1% | 45.7 -22% | 88.3 51% | 64 9% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90 | 90 0% | 72.1 -20% | 100 11% | 95.9 7% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 10% /
11% | -18% /
-19% | 1% /
8% | 14% /
30% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25510 Hz | ≤ 29 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25510 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 29 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4184 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5328 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5141 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4552 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 15% | -1158% | 19% | -6% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 477.1 | 889 86% | 1082 127% | 540 13% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 294.6 | 336.4 14% | 401.9 36% | 411.5 40% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1269 | 1678 32% | 1666 31% | 1272 0% | |
| Score Total | 3721 | 3731 0% | 942 -75% | 3756 1% | 2810 -24% |
| Score Write | 1421 | 1158 -19% | 48 -97% | 1468 3% | 1022 -28% |
| Score Read | 1541 | 1727 12% | 646 -58% | 1549 1% | 1206 -22% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.034 | 0.028 18% | 4.15 -12106% | 0.029 15% | 0.034 -0% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.054 | 0.031 43% | 0.08 -48% | 0.041 24% | 0.034 37% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1160 | 870 -25% | 15.3 -99% | 1185 2% | 789 -32% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1269 | 1430 13% | 371.6 -71% | 1229 -3% | 962 -24% |
| 4K Write | 112.8 | 133.2 18% | 1.2 -99% | 127.6 13% | 112.2 -1% |
| 4K Read | 51 | 54 6% | 47.1 -8% | 48.01 -6% | 41.34 -19% |
| Seq Write | 1475 | 1540 4% | 311.7 -79% | 1550 5% | 1207 -18% |
| Seq Read | 2208 | 2429 10% | 2277 3% | 2719 23% | 2026 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 27473 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9125 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 104111 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20838 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6564 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 3518 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2373 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 24 | |||
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 37 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 39 | |||
| Doom (2016) | 54 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.4 / 31 / 31.2 dB |
| Carga |
| 43.3 / 46.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) | ||
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 7% | 6% | -2% | -2% | |
| off / environment * | 28.3 | 29.4 -4% | 28.2 -0% | 28.8 -2% | 28.4 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.4 | 29.4 3% | 28.2 7% | 33.1 -9% | 29 5% |
| Idle Average * | 31 | 29.9 4% | 28.2 9% | 33.1 -7% | 29 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.2 | 29.9 4% | 28.2 10% | 34 -9% | 32.2 -3% |
| Load Average * | 43.3 | 38.3 12% | 39 10% | 37.2 14% | 47.1 -9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.2 | 39.8 14% | 46.1 -0% | 52 -13% | |
| Load Maximum * | 46.2 | 39.6 14% | 46.3 -0% | 47.1 -2% | 47.1 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.8 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.4 °C / 0.7 F).
Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.4 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 6.3 / 7.9 / 8.1 Watt |
| Carga |
84.9 / 102.4 Watt |
   
| |
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11, IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -8% | -14% | -82% | -60% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6.3 | 5.05 20% | 8.3 -32% | 14.5 -130% | 11.9 -89% |
| Idle Average * | 7.9 | 8.2 -4% | 10.2 -29% | 17.3 -119% | 17.1 -116% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.1 | 12.2 -51% | 10.4 -28% | 17.4 -115% | 17.3 -114% |
| Load Average * | 84.9 | 82 3% | 67.5 20% | 93 -10% | 94.7 -12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 96.3 | 93.1 3% | 96.5 -0% | 128.8 -34% | 104.8 -9% |
| Load Maximum * | 102.4 | 120 -17% | 117.2 -14% | 122 -19% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 73 Wh | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 73 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 72 Wh | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 65 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh | Microsoft Surface Book 2 i7-8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 75 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | 11% | -37% | 3% | 80% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1023 | 1061 4% | 1066 4% | 386 -62% | 831 -19% | 1469 44% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 532 | 535 1% | 484 -9% | 232 -56% | 434 -18% | 663 25% |
| Load | 70 | 70 0% | 96 37% | 75 7% | 103 47% | 190 171% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 68 | 230 |
Pro
Contra
O ASUS Zenbook Pro UX550VE de $1.700, com sua GTX 1050 Ti, melhora o desempenho do UX550VD equipado com GTX 1050com muitas poucas desvantagens. Recebemos a mesma carcaça de alumínio unibody atrativa, que fornece peso e tamanho razoáveis, bem como uma seleção de portas versátil (embora o último, que substitui duas portas USB convencionais tipo A por Thunderbolt/Type-C, pode estar ligeiramente à frente de seu tempo). O aparelho também oferece um desempenho forte em rajadas curtas (bem como para o uso geral da aplicativos), tudo ao mesmo tempo que mantém os tempos de funcionamento da bateria que são bem melhores do que aqueles da concorrência. Além disso, a máquina é facilmente mantida através do painel traseiro removível.
No geral, o ZenBook Pro, no entanto, continua a ser um pacote convincente, sem maiores aspectos negativos, além de uma redução desafortunada do desempenho sob uso intenso contínuo.
As queixas da nossa unidade de revisão anterior incluem o afogamento da CPU e GPU sob carga combinada, bem como o fato de que a GTX 1050 Ti nunca mostra todo seu potencial no Zenbook Pro mesmo quando estressado independentemente. O desempenho ainda está bem acima o modelo GTX 1050—bem como a maioria dos concorrentes de tamanho semelhante em sua classe—mas poderia ter sido ainda melhor com um sistema de resfriamento mais agressivo. Os níveis de ruído também ficaram um pouco altos sob uso intenso (conforme medido através da unidade de análise de hoje, o que, é claro, foi prejudicado pelo que parecia ser uma ventoinha de resfriamento ruim), de modo que essa é outra falha potencial em relação ao modelo anterior. Além disso, algumas outras queixas menores se aplicam - como a webcam pobre e o uso de PWM (embora, de alta frequência) em configurações de brilho abaixo de 30%, mas esse é realmente o único outro ponto negativo significativo.
Carcaças mais resistentes, melhores dispositivos de entrada e telas de maior qualidade também podem ser obtidos em portáteis concorrentes mais caros. Algumas alternativas incluem—entre outros—o Dell XPS 15 9560, Lenovo Yoga 720, MSI GS63VR, e Microsoft Surface Book 2. Mas, no geral, o ZenBook Pro, no entanto, continua a ser um pacote convincente, sem maiores aspectos negativos, além de uma redução desafortunada do desempenho sob uso intenso contínuo.
Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T
-
11/23/2017 v6(old)
Steve Schardein
Pricecompare
