Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Cube Thinker Laptop (Core m3-7Y30, 8 GB, 256 GB)

Florian Schaar (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/21/2017

Portátil Surface com Welfare. Os portáteis do Extremo Oriente estão cada vez melhores, pelo menos em relação a sua aparência e características. Um representante da classe premium chinesa é o Cube Thinker, que vem com uma carcaça de alumínio de aparência elegante e uma tela Surface-Book. No entanto, será que o seu desempenho consegue acompanhar a sua apresentação?

Cube Thinker m3
Processador
Placa gráfica
Memória
8192 MB 
Pantalha
13.5 polegadas 3:2, 3000x2000 pixel 267 PPI, 5 pontos de toque, native pen support, Panasonic MEI96A2, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Disco rígido
,  GB 
, SSD SATA de 256 GB (sem marca), 210 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: fones, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 14 x 313 x 237
Bateria
50 Wh Lítio-Polímero, SR Real battery, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 10 h
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2.0 MP
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: dual channel, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, Fonte de alimentação, adaptador europeu, fanless
peso
1.671 kg, Suprimento de energia: 218 g
Preço
525 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Broadcom 802.11ac
660 MBit/s ∼100% +119%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
534 MBit/s ∼81% +77%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
302 MBit/s ∼46%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
208 MBit/s ∼32% -31%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Broadcom 802.11ac
689 MBit/s ∼100% +104%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
556 MBit/s ∼81% +65%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
337 MBit/s ∼49%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
142 MBit/s ∼21% -58%
526
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 526 cd/m² Médio: 461.2 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
iluminação: 81 %
iluminação com acumulador: 448 cd/m²
Contraste: 1723:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.53 | - Ø
70% sRGB (Argyll) 44% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.46
Cube Thinker m3
Panasonic MEI96A2, , 3000x2000, 13.5
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
3000x2000, 13.5
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
AU Optronics AUO106D B125HANO1.0, , 1920x1080, 12.5
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
AUO B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
20%
54%
31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
65 (31, 34)
48.4 (19.6, 28.8)
26%
28 (9, 19)
57%
29 (15, 14)
55%
Response Time Black / White *
38 (21, 17)
32.8 (7.6, 25.2)
14%
19 (5, 14)
50%
22 (5, 17)
42%
PWM Frequency
200 (75)
192 (30)
-4%
Screen
17%
-24%
-33%
Brightness
461
410
-11%
364
-21%
298
-35%
Brightness Distribution
81
93
15%
88
9%
90
11%
Black Level *
0.26
0.254
2%
0.32
-23%
0.21
19%
Contrast
1723
1696
-2%
1184
-31%
1438
-17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.3
2.06
38%
4.78
-45%
6.33
-92%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.53
2.22
12%
4.27
-69%
8.13
-221%
Gamma
2.46 98%
2.13 113%
2.34 103%
2.52 95%
CCT
6563 99%
6520 100%
7376 88%
6811 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
44
64
45%
42
-5%
60
36%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
70
96
37%
65
-7%
93
33%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
19% / 18%
15% / -9%
-1% / -16%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31 ms rise
↘ 34 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (43 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz
75 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 75 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5559 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Intel Core i5-6300U
122 Points ∼100% +18%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
103 Points ∼84%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
85 Points ∼70% -17%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
78 Points ∼64% -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Intel Core i5-6300U
305 Points ∼100% +35%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
226 Points ∼74%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
209 Points ∼69% -8%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
208 Points ∼68% -8%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
3699 Points ∼100% +1%
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
3656 Points ∼99%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
3644 Points ∼99% 0%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
3496 Points ∼95% -4%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
2881 Points ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
2814 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
2767 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
2727 Points ∼95% -5%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
26021 Points ∼100%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
21128 Points ∼81% -19%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
19348 Points ∼74% -26%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
1704 ms * ∼100% -21%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1623.7 ms * ∼95% -15%
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
1414.1 ms * ∼83%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
174.42 Points ∼100%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
143.85 Points ∼82% -18%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
111.11 Points ∼64% -36%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2881 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3801 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3656 pontos
Ajuda
Cube Thinker m3
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Lite-On CV1-8B128
AS SSD
86%
-44%
-5%
Access Time Write *
0.179
0.037
79%
0.183
-2%
0.073
59%
Access Time Read *
0.128
0.049
62%
0.166
-30%
0.109
15%
4K-64 Write
290.24
281.41
-3%
21.55
-93%
105.75
-64%
4K-64 Read
324.57
1409.22
334%
82.88
-74%
295.1
-9%
4K Write
55.01
84.96
54%
27.49
-50%
57.01
4%
4K Read
26.4
34.31
30%
15.9
-40%
28.29
7%
Seq Write
362.84
275.22
-24%
130.26
-64%
175.65
-52%
Seq Read
483.68
1223
153%
480.88
-1%
486.25
1%

* ... smaller is better

Sequential Read: 483.68 MB/s
Sequential Write: 362.84 MB/s
4K Read: 26.4 MB/s
4K Write: 55.01 MB/s
4K-64 Read: 324.57 MB/s
4K-64 Write: 290.24 MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.128 ms
Access Time Write: 0.179 ms
Score Read: 399 Points
Score Write: 382 Points
Score Total: 988 Points
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
2031 Points ∼100% +168%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
789 Points ∼39% +4%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
757 Points ∼37%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
11340 Points ∼100% +92%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
6539 Points ∼58% +11%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
5911 Points ∼52%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
5510 Points ∼49% -7%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
5076 Points ∼45% -14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
43637 Points ∼100% +31%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
38293 Points ∼88% +15%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
33229 Points ∼76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
123411 Points ∼100% +69%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
76530 Points ∼62% +4%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
73237 Points ∼59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
82606 Points ∼100% +43%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
65549 Points ∼79% +13%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
57778 Points ∼70%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
35640 Points ∼100% +20%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
29788 Points ∼84%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
21421 Points ∼60% -28%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
33260 Points ∼100% +14%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
29224 Points ∼88%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
15597 Points ∼47% -47%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
33761 Points ∼100% +15%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
29347 Points ∼87%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
16599 Points ∼49% -43%
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4571 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
682 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
317 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
180 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
94.2 fps ∼100% +200%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
38.9 fps ∼41% +24%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
36.4 fps ∼39% +16%
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
31.45 fps ∼33%
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 31.4517.6414.154.57fps

Barulho

Ocioso
30.6 / 30.6 / 31.6 dB
Carga
30.6 / 30.6 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.329.435.63529.3252928.733.328.2293129.129.43225.429.14030.526.632.329.830.55033.632.634.428.533.66332.132.432.428.932.18031.32930.129.131.310028.92729.428.928.912527.724.725.928.427.716026.824.626.22726.82002626.12623.82625023.32224.122.723.33152323.62421.92340021.9212220.921.95002121.421.920.52163020.720.121.519.520.780019.819.820.418.419.8100018.818.720.118.218.8125018.817.819.717.818.8160018.51819.11818.5200018.117.618.717.818.1250017.717.418.617.817.7315017.317.518.817.917.3400017.117.218.517.917.1500016.917.718.21816.963001717.618.31817800016.917.418.317.916.91000016.917.518.617.816.91250016.917.818.517.716.91600017.319.41917.817.3SPL30.830.731.730.730.8N1.51.51.71.51.5median 18.8Cube Thinker m3median 18.7median 19.7median 18median 18.8Delta2.92.42.42.12.9hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Carga Máxima
 40.7 °C32.2 °C28.3 °C 
 40.8 °C32.8 °C28.2 °C 
 36 °C30.1 °C28.1 °C 
Máximo: 40.8 °C
Médio: 33 °C
29.6 °C33.9 °C40.5 °C
29.3 °C32.8 °C41 °C
28.6 °C31.8 °C35.2 °C
Máximo: 41 °C
Médio: 33.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  37.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.93544.92539.328.239.33134.925.434.94037.129.837.1503928.5396338.728.938.7803529.13510037.928.937.912537.928.437.916038273820038.323.838.325040.122.740.131544.121.944.140047.220.947.250051.720.551.763057.319.557.380060.318.460.3100064.318.264.3125057.917.857.9160055.21855.2200062.717.862.7250058.317.858.3315062.917.962.9400063.717.963.7500062.31862.3630056.11856.1800048.817.948.81000043.717.843.71250045.617.745.61600051.517.851.5SPL72.330.772.3N27.81.527.8median 51.7Cube Thinker m3median 18median 51.7Delta8.32.18.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Cube Thinker m3 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.33 / 0.31 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.5 / 10.3 / 11.5 Watt
Carga midlight 23.3 / 21.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Cube Thinker m3
7Y30, HD Graphics 615, , IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Lite-On CV1-8B128, IPS with 72% NTSC, 1920x1080, 13.3
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12
Power Consumption
23%
23%
32%
Idle Minimum *
4.5
3.7
18%
3.4
24%
2.7
40%
Idle Average *
10.3
7.4
28%
7
32%
2.7
74%
Idle Maximum *
11.5
8.2
29%
7.6
34%
7.2
37%
Load Average *
23.3
17
27%
19
18%
22
6%
Load Maximum *
21.1
18.6
12%
20.1
5%
20.5
3%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
10h 10min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
4h 13min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 12min
Cube Thinker m3
7Y30, HD Graphics 615, 50 Wh
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
6300U, Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 78 Wh
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 54 Wh
Battery Runtime
50%
156%
67%
Reader / Idle
610
1070
75%
1072
76%
1027
68%
WiFi v1.3
253
402
59%
805
218%
386
53%
Load
132
153
16%
362
174%
239
81%
H.264
604
696

Pro

+ Tela brilhante de alta resolução
+ Design elegante
+ Carcaça robusta de alumínio
+ Construção sem ventoinha
+ Fácil manutenção
+ Touchpad grande
+ Sensor de digitais
+ Bom equipamento de armazenamento
+ Suficientes conexões
+ Muito acessível
+ USB-C

Contra

- Sem garantia
- Tela insuficientemente colada
- O teclado não dá uma impressão confiável
- Duração ruim da bateria
- Zumbe durante a operação conectado na tomada
- Peso relativamente alto
In the test: the Cube Thinker
In the test: the Cube Thinker

O Cube Thinker é um típico portátil chinês: há muito brilho e resplendor, mas em condições de iluminação desfavoráveis, se formam algumas sombras profundas. O design bem-sucedido, é contrastado por uma tela que está caindo (pode ser reparada) e um teclado cujas teclas têm alturas diferentes. Devido à escassa duração da bateria, o bom desempenho não pode ser aproveitado por muito tempo. O ruído de carregamento subliminar pode tornar-se irritante para as naturezas sensíveis. 

No lado positivo, é uma excelente tela para este preço, uma base robusta, um bom desempenho e, não esqueça: um preço imbatível. Esses compromissos e também a falta de garantia devem ser considerados antes da compra. 

Cube Thinker m3 - 06/29/2017 v6
Florian Schaar

Acabamento
79 /  98 → 81%
Teclado
73%
Mouse
83%
Conectividade
48 / 80 → 60%
Peso
67 / 78 → 74%
Bateria
76%
Pantalha
91%
Desempenho do jogos
53 / 68 → 78%
Desempenho da aplicação
70 / 87 → 80%
Temperatura
91 / 91 → 100%
Ruído
94%
Audio
76 / 91 → 83%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Médio
73%
80%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Cube Thinker Laptop (Core m3-7Y30, 8 GB, 256 GB)
Florian Schaar, 2017-07-21 (Update: 2017-07-27)