Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Microsoft Surface (i5-7200U)

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 06/26/2017

Muita tela e sem substância. O novo portátil Surface soa e parece mais especial do que realmente é. Embora a exclusiva tela táctil 3:2 seja brilhante, nítida e colorida para artistas gráficos, quase todo o resto não consegue impressionar.

Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 (Surface Laptop Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7200U
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 620, Análises do: 300 MHz, Memoría: 933 MHz, LPDDR3, 21.20.16.4636
Memória
4096 MB 
, 1866.7 MHz, Dual-Channel, 10-10-10-28, Soldered
Pantalha
13.5 polegadas 3:2, 2256x1504 pixel 201 PPI, Yes, ID: MEI96A2, Name: Panasonic VVX14T092N00, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA, 128 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 14.5 x 308 x 223
Bateria
45 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.25 kg, Suprimento de energia: 200 g
Preço
1000 USD

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: AC adapter (SurfaceConnect)
Right: AC adapter (SurfaceConnect)
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: USB 3.0, mDP, 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: USB 3.0, mDP, 3.5 mm combo audio
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
534 MBit/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
525 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
501 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
588 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
575 MBit/s ∼98% +3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
556 MBit/s ∼95%
392
cd/m²
396.6
cd/m²
372.5
cd/m²
387.8
cd/m²
384.2
cd/m²
376.9
cd/m²
368.2
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
370.9
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 396.6 cd/m² Médio: 378.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.18 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 384.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 1067:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | - Ø
94.2% sRGB (Argyll) 63.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.21
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
ID: MEI96A2, Name: Panasonic VVX14T092N00, IPS, 13.5, 2256x1504
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
Panasonic MEI96A2, IPS, 13.5, 3000x2000
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853, IPS, 12.3, 2736x1824
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
APPA033, , 13.3, 2560x1600
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Response Times
-10%
13%
-18%
23%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
50.8 (25.6, 25.2)
61 (28, 33)
-20%
46 (17.2, 28.8, plateau, spikes in between)
9%
47.2 (19.6, 27.6)
7%
32.8 (16, 16.8)
35%
Response Time Black / White *
37.2 (20, 17.2)
37 (21, 16)
1%
31.2 (6, 25.2, Spikes in between)
16%
53 (10, 43)
-42%
33.2 (10.8, 22.4)
11%
PWM Frequency
50 (50)
Screen
-14%
-36%
-2%
-89%
Brightness
378
423
12%
396
5%
542
43%
325
-14%
Brightness Distribution
90
86
-4%
87
-3%
90
0%
89
-1%
Black Level *
0.36
0.37
-3%
0.36
-0%
0.56
-56%
0.195
46%
Contrast
1067
1241
16%
1147
7%
1016
-5%
1801
69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.8
2.28
-27%
3.09
-72%
1.4
22%
7.4
-311%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.2
2.48
-107%
3.92
-227%
1.8
-50%
6.71
-459%
Gamma
2.21 109%
2.5 96%
2.3 104%
2.16 111%
2.74 88%
CCT
6708 97%
8602 76%
7333 89%
6877 95%
7222 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.7
62
-3%
61
-4%
78.4
23%
50.48
-21%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94.2
96
2%
97
3%
99.3
5%
73.31
-22%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-12% / -13%
-12% / -27%
-10% / -5%
-33% / -67%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25.6 ms rise
↘ 25.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8586 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE
Intel Core i7-7600U
162 Points ∼81% +29%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
139 Points ∼70% +10%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Core i5-6267U
131 Points ∼66% +4%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼65% +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
126 Points ∼63% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
124 Points ∼62% -2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
126 Points ∼63%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
117 Points ∼59% -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
88 Points ∼44% -30%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
86 Points ∼43% -32%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE
Intel Core i7-7600U
379 Points ∼18% +17%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
343 Points ∼16% +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Core i5-6267U
339 Points ∼16% +5%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
328 Points ∼15% +1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
324 Points ∼15%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
309 Points ∼14% -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
309 Points ∼14% -5%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
294 Points ∼14% -9%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
256 Points ∼12% -21%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
206 Points ∼10% -36%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE
Intel Core i7-7600U
1.85 Points ∼81% +54%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.64 Points ∼72% +37%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.47 Points ∼65% +23%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
1.45 Points ∼64% +21%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
1.36 Points ∼60% +13%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
1.33 Points ∼59% +11%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.2 Points ∼53%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
1.03 Points ∼45% -14%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
0.98 Points ∼43% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE
Intel Core i7-7600U
4.03 Points ∼2% +15%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.83 Points ∼2% +9%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.67 Points ∼2% +5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.5 Points ∼1%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
3.45 Points ∼1% -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
3.3 Points ∼1% -6%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
3.24 Points ∼1% -7%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
2.85 Points ∼1% -19%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
2.27 Points ∼1% -35%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE
Intel Core i7-7600U
6263 Points ∼71% +27%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
5630 Points ∼63% +15%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
4999 Points ∼56% +2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
4913 Points ∼55%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
4846 Points ∼55% -1%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
4396 Points ∼50% -11%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
3871 Points ∼44% -21%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
3286 Points ∼37% -33%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE
Intel Core i7-7600U
13170 Points ∼26% +36%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
11676 Points ∼23% +20%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
11292 Points ∼23% +16%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
10525 Points ∼21% +8%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
10003 Points ∼20% +3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
9706 Points ∼20%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
8718 Points ∼18% -10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
6994 Points ∼14% -28%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
787.585 s * ∼9% -69%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
644.6 s * ∼8% -39%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
526 s * ∼6% -13%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
467.287 s * ∼6% -0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
465.277 s * ∼5%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
456.763 s * ∼5% +2%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
898 Seconds * ∼4% -24%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
817.6 Seconds * ∼4% -13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
722.288 Seconds * ∼3%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
655.742 Seconds * ∼3% +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Intel Core i5-6360U
643 Seconds * ∼3% +11%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
563.28 Seconds * ∼3% +22%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
5609
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
9706
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4913
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
29.18 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.2 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
40.48 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
324 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
126 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA
4106 Points ∼63%
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
GeForce GTX 965M, 6600U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
3949 Points ∼61% -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256
3853 Points ∼59% -6%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256
4205 Points ∼45% +6%
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
GeForce GTX 965M, 6600U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4136 Points ∼44% +4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA
3962 Points ∼43%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016
Iris Graphics 540, 6360U, Apple SSD AP0256
3280 Points ∼55% +7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA
3071 Points ∼51%
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
GeForce GTX 965M, 6600U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
3040 Points ∼51% -1%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3071 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3962 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4106 pontos
Ajuda
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Apple SSD AP0256
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
328%
115%
528%
293%
Write 4k QD32
41.18
347.1
743%
153.6
273%
419
917%
218.3
430%
Read 4k QD32
77.75
326.9
320%
368.3
374%
657
745%
479.2
516%
Write 4k
40.45
108.6
168%
101.5
151%
23.5
-42%
116.9
189%
Read 4k
22.15
40.91
85%
28.51
29%
16.1
-27%
29.31
32%
Write 512
126.7
698.1
451%
154.2
22%
1481
1069%
439.9
247%
Read 512
278.5
687.4
147%
266.3
-4%
1183
325%
1036
272%
Write Seq
128.2
860.9
572%
154.2
20%
1336
942%
732.6
471%
Read Seq
425.6
1017
139%
666
56%
1662
291%
1233
190%
Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA
Sequential Read: 425.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 128.2 MB/s
512K Read: 278.5 MB/s
512K Write: 126.7 MB/s
4K Read: 22.15 MB/s
4K Write: 40.45 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 77.75 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 41.18 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
2597 Points ∼15% +114%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650, 7267U
2517 (min: 2509) Points ∼14% +107%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, 7500U
1858 Points ∼11% +53%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
1838 Points ∼10% +51%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1650 Points ∼9% +36%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
1486 Points ∼8% +22%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1215 Points ∼7%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
1014 Points ∼6% -17%
Fujitsu Lifebook E544
Intel HD Graphics 4600, 4210M
698 Points ∼4% -43%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650, 7267U
2761.5 (min: 2743) Points ∼5% +88%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
2696 Points ∼5% +84%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, 7500U
2206 Points ∼4% +50%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
2124 Points ∼4% +45%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1587 Points ∼3% +8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1467 Points ∼3%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
1410 Points ∼3% -4%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
1186 Points ∼2% -19%
Fujitsu Lifebook E544
Intel HD Graphics 4600, 4210M
744 Points ∼1% -49%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650, 7267U
1698 Points ∼4% +115%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
1657 Points ∼4% +110%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, 7500U
1621 Points ∼4% +105%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
1369 Points ∼3% +74%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1055 Points ∼3% +34%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
825 Points ∼2% +5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
789 Points ∼2%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
735 Points ∼2% -7%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
13172 Points ∼8% +101%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650, 7267U
13153 Points ∼8% +101%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
11232 Points ∼7% +72%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, 7500U
9056 Points ∼6% +38%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
8861 Points ∼5% +36%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
7064 Points ∼4% +8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
6539 Points ∼4%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
6078 Points ∼4% -7%
Fujitsu Lifebook E544
Intel HD Graphics 4600, 4210M
4983 Points ∼3% -24%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
51806 Points ∼7% +56%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
40939 Points ∼6% +23%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
33260 Points ∼5%
3DMark 11 Performance
1586 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
48984 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5454 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
743 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 45.827.422.77fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 18.5fps

Barulho

Ocioso
28.2 / 28.2 / 29 dB
Carga
30.3 / 39.3 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
GeForce GTX 965M, 6600U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Apple SSD AP0256
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
Noise
-8%
-14%
-4%
2%
off / environment *
28.2
29.4
-4%
30.2
-7%
Idle Minimum *
28.2
29.4
-4%
31.5
-12%
30.2
-7%
28.9
-2%
Idle Average *
28.2
29.4
-4%
31.5
-12%
30.2
-7%
28.9
-2%
Idle Maximum *
29
29.7
-2%
31.5
-9%
30.2
-4%
28.9
-0%
Load Average *
30.3
39
-29%
40.5
-34%
33
-9%
30.9
-2%
Load Maximum *
39.3
40.2
-2%
40.7
-4%
36.2
8%
33.5
15%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39.5

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 33.8 °C36.4 °C30.2 °C 
 28.6 °C34 °C27.4 °C 
 25 °C25.6 °C25.6 °C 
Máximo: 36.4 °C
Médio: 29.6 °C
42.4 °C45.2 °C42.2 °C
38.4 °C41.4 °C38.4 °C
35.8 °C37 °C35.6 °C
Máximo: 45.2 °C
Médio: 39.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  37.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203941.6253536.83132.8354033.934.45033.334.16333.4338031.935.410031.238.812530.44516030.253.420028.355.125027.758.431527.759.840026.258.850025.464.663025.763.38002562.8100024.564.2125023.861.4160023.762.9200023.661.9250023.361.4315023.256.1400022.958.4500022.957.3630022.957.980002357.31000022.958.21250022.959.41600022.948.1SPL36.172.9N2.733.2median 23.8Microsoft Surface Laptop i5median 58.4Delta2.13.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64.61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.18 / 0.31 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.2 / 6.5 / 6.8 Watt
Carga midlight 28.2 / 36 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
6600U, GeForce GTX 965M, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
6300U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, Apple SSD AP0256, , 2560x1600, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Power Consumption
-75%
-12%
-34%
14%
Idle Minimum *
3.2
4.15
-30%
4.4
-38%
2.1
34%
4.1
-28%
Idle Average *
6.5
8
-23%
9
-38%
7.6
-17%
4.2
35%
Idle Maximum *
6.8
11.9
-75%
10.7
-57%
8.2
-21%
5.1
25%
Load Average *
28.2
67
-138%
19.6
30%
56.4
-100%
22.1
22%
Load Maximum *
36
76
-111%
19.9
45%
59.8
-66%
29.4
18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
58

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
22h 31min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
10h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 04min
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Microsoft Surface Book with Performance Base
6600U, GeForce GTX 965M, 78 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 38 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 49.2 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T
7500U, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh
Battery Runtime
-6%
-24%
-27%
12%
-15%
Reader / Idle
1351
1530
13%
899
-33%
1295
-4%
WiFi v1.3
602
576
-4%
427
-29%
566
-6%
677
12%
511
-15%
Load
124
90
-27%
111
-10%
66
-47%
157
27%

Pro

+ Cores e escala de cinza muito precisas antes da calibração
+ Luz de fundo brilhante da tela; excelentes níveis de preto
+ Excelente qualidade de construção; design rígido
+ Cobertura sRGB quase plena
+ Exclusiva textura Alcantara
+ Alto falantes acima da média
+ Suporte para Windows Hello
+ Pousa palmas permanece frio
+ Ventoinha do sistema silenciosa
+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Sem USB type-C, Thunderbolt 3, SIM, leitor SD, seguro Kensington, ou leitor de digitais
- A base inferior pode esquentar muito sob processamento pesado
- O chassi reverbera notavelmente durante a reprodução de áudio
- HD Graphics 620 integrada de desempenho fraco
- Incapaz de manter o Turbo Boost máximo da CPU
- Não atualizável pelo usuário final
- Sem acessórios ou adaptadores incluídos
- Ruído da ventoinha com frequência um pouco alta
- Inconveniente posicionamento do botão de energia
- Tempos de resposta lentos da tela
- RAM DDR3 RAM em vez de DDR4
- SKU Core i7 muito caro
- SSD muito lento
In review: Microsoft Surface Laptop Core i5
In review: Microsoft Surface Laptop Core i5

A Microsoft anuncia o portátil Surface como "mais que um portátil tradicional", mas nossa experiência foi o oposto. Se recursos como USB Type-C, leitores de cartões SD, e NVMe são mais importantes, então os atuais Ultrabooks carros-chefes da Lenovo, HP, e Dell oferecem mais do que o mais recente Surface da Microsoft pode oferecer. A base Alcantara certamente é diferente e o torna um excelente ponto de destaque para o marketing, mas sua conclusão se sente superficial sem vantagens significantes para o usuário final.

O maior motivo para adquirir um portátil Surface é a sua tela de 13,5 polegadas, já que todo o resto do portátil está abaixo do esperado. Se o painel 3:2 ou o SKU Iris Graphics não forem indispensáveis, então portátil se torna ainda menos atraente, em comparação com a pletora de alternativas de 13 e 14 polegadas, disponíveis atualmente. A longa duração da bateria, o baixo ruído da ventoinha, e a ampla gama de cores do portátil Microsoft pode ser encontrado em concorrentes como o XPS 13 9360 QHD ou o Notebook 9.

Como o SKU Core i7 se desempenhará sob estresse será interessante para ver na futura análise. Se nossa configuração Core i5 apenas consegue manter as velocidades Turbo Boost na faixa dos 2,7 a 2,8 GHz, então questionamos como o mais exigente SKU Core i7 pode manter sua velocidade Turbo Boost máxima de 4,0 GHz. Também estam,os preocupados se a RAM DDR3 conseguira manter todo o potencial da GPU Iris Plus Graphics 640 similar a como a nossa GPU HD Graphics 620 se desempenha de forma inferior para a nossa configuração Core i5.

A Microsoft está ofertando o seu portátil para estudantes e assim podemos apreciar que a qualidade do aparelho não sofre de recortes aparentes. Com isso dito, sua longa lista de recursos ausentes limita severamente a versatilidade do portátil Surface e dificulta a nossa recomendação, tanto para estudantes como para usuários em geral.

Muito pouco, muito tarde. O portátil Surface é um portátil solidamente construído e sem frescuras, com uma bela tela. Infelizmente, não oferece muito mais e não chega nem perto da versatilidade do Surface Pro 4 ou da maioria dos Ultrabooks atualmente disponíveis no mercado. 

Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 - 06/18/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
79 /  98 → 81%
Teclado
79%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
32 / 80 → 40%
Peso
72 / 78 → 86%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
58 / 68 → 86%
Desempenho da aplicação
78 / 87 → 90%
Temperatura
92 / 91 → 100%
Ruído
96%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
53 / 85 → 62%
Médio
74%
85%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Microsoft Surface (i5-7200U)
Allen Ngo, 2017-06-26 (Update: 2017-07- 3)