Breve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion 15 (Core i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 16 GB RAM)

Name: HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng
Brand: HP

Agora com Whiskey Lake. O design permanece inalterado, mas por dentro há muita coisa acontecendo. A HP atualizou a série Pavilion 15 para os chips Intel Whiskey Lake e a nova geração de GPUs GeForce MX da NVIDIA. Leia para descobrir se este novo modelo melhora seus irmãos Kaby Lake e AMD e como se sai em nossos testes.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/23/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Whiskey Lake Windows Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng (Pavilion 15-cs Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i5-8265U 4 x 1.6 - 3.9 GHz, Whiskey Lake-U

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 4 GB VRAM, GDDR5 SDRAM, 1D13, Intel UHD Graphics 620

Memória

16 GB

, DDR4, dual-channel

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE080D, IPS, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium

Disco rígido

Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, 256 GB

, 1 TB WDC WD10SPZX-60Z10T0, 1220 GB livre

Placa de Som

Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado para fones e microfone de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18 x 361 x 245

Bateria

41 Wh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 2.1 MP, 16:9, Full HD (1.920 x 1.080)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, HP Audio Switch, HP CoolSense, HP JumpStart, McAfee LiveSafe, Netflix, 12 Meses Garantia

peso

1.94 kg, Suprimento de energia: 340 g

Preço

1100 Euro

Links

HP página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T MSI PS63 Modern 8RC DIN A4 ❌

Left-hand side: HDMI, LAN, 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C, 3.5 mm jack

Right-hand side: SD card reader, cable lock, 2x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, power connector

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Multimedia (17.6 - 205, n=66, last 2 years)	93.3 MB/s +155%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	69.1 MB/s +89%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	39 MB/s +7%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	36.6 MB/s
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	33.5 MB/s -8%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	32.6 MB/s -11%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	23.6 MB/s -36%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Multimedia (16.8 - 266, n=62, last 2 years)	122.6 MB/s +244%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	81.8 MB/s +130%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	36 MB/s +1%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	36 MB/s +1%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	35.6 MB/s
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	34.6 MB/s -3%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	28.3 MB/s -21%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Wireless-AC 9560	648 (626^min - 667^max) MBit/s +15%
Average of class Multimedia (285 - 998, n=2, last 2 years)	642 MBit/s +14%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Intel Wireless-AC 9560	634 (613^min - 649^max) MBit/s +13%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	606 (306^min - 655^max) MBit/s +8%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	562 (507^min - 591^max) MBit/s
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821	289 (232^min - 343^max) MBit/s -49%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821	269 MBit/s -52%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Multimedia (1017 - 1675, n=2, last 2 years)	1346 MBit/s +99%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	676 (636^min - 689^max) MBit/s
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Intel Wireless-AC 9560	648 (578^min - 676^max) MBit/s -4%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Wireless-AC 9560	522 (371^min - 601^max) MBit/s -23%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	294 (161^min - 330^max) MBit/s -57%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821	280 MBit/s -59%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821	265 (239^min - 288^max) MBit/s -61%

HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø676 (636-689)

HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø562 (507-591)


290 cd/m²	278 cd/m²	279 cd/m²
300 cd/m²	320 cd/m²	277 cd/m²
287 cd/m²	321 cd/m²	285 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

BOE080D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 321 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 293 cd/m² Minimum: 19.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 273 cd/m²
Contraste: 1231:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.71 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
88% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng BOE080D, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L BOE NV156FHM-N48, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T LP156WFC-SPD1, , 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Chi Mei CMN15E8 N156HCE/EN1, , 1920x1080, 15.60	HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng AU Optronics AUO23ED, , 1920x1080, 15.60	HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		-37%	-38%	-2%	-41%	-42%
Display P3 Coverage	67.2	40.02 -40%	38.51 -43%	63.5 -6%	36.7 -45%	36.27 -46%
sRGB Coverage	88.1	58.5 -34%	57.9 -34%	87.9 0%	55 -38%	54.6 -38%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	64.4	41.34 -36%	39.79 -38%	63.9 -1%	37.91 -41%	37.47 -42%
Response Times		0%	9%	3970%	9%	-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	43 ?(22, 21)	45 ?(23, 22) -5%	38.8 ?(20.8, 18) 10%	42 ?(23, 19) 2%	40 ?(18, 22) 7%	45 ?(21, 24) -5%
Response Time Black / White *	29 ?(16, 13)	33 ?(18, 15) -14%	26.8 ?(16, 10.8) 8%	32 ?(20, 12) -10%	26 ?(16, 10) 10%	28 ?(16, 12) 3%
PWM Frequency	208 ?(90)	250 ?(90) 20%		25000 ?(20) 11919%
Screen		-6%	-12%	9%	-16%	-37%
Brightness middle	320	278 -13%	262 -18%	289 -10%	186 -42%	240 -25%
Brightness	293	271 -8%	256 -13%	262 -11%	180 -39%	237 -19%
Brightness Distribution	86	89 3%	90 5%	75 -13%	88 2%	90 5%
Black Level *	0.26	0.26 -0%	0.21 19%	0.26 -0%	0.15 42%	0.42 -62%
Contrast	1231	1069 -13%	1248 1%	1112 -10%	1240 1%	571 -54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.5	4.73 -5%	5.8 -29%	2.9 36%	5.94 -32%	7.43 -65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.81	8.38 5%	14.3 -62%	5.71 35%	10.81 -23%	12.42 -41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.71	2.59 45%	2.5 47%	1.42 70%	4.44 6%	6.26 -33%
Gamma	2.45 ^90%	2.38 ^92%	1.99 ^111%	2.39 ^92%	2.81 ^78%	2.96 ^74%
CCT	7085 ^92%	6160 ^106%	6528 ^100%	6705 ^97%	6272 ^104%	6661 ^98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	58	36 -38%	36.6 -37%	57 -2%	35 -40%	35 -40%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	88	58 -34%	57.6 -35%	87 -1%	55 -37%	54 -39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *		5.17	4.6	2.88	6.07
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-14% / -10%	-14% / -15%	1326% / 750%	-16% / -18%	-27% / -33%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

208 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 208 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 208 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø495 (482.45-528.56)

Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø470 (467.49-492.88)

Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø570 (535-723)

MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø529 (524.25-571.63)

HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U: Ø431 (417.88-605.96)

HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø484 (479.58-505.2)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia (142.6 - 308, n=99, last 2 years)	251 Points +60%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Intel Core i7-8565U	173 Points +10%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Core i7-8550U	172 Points +10%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U	165 Points +5%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Intel Core i5-8265U	157 Points
Average Intel Core i5-8265U (111 - 164, n=35)	155 Points -1%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng Intel Core i5-8250U	144 Points -8%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	124 Points -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia (785 - 4703, n=106, last 2 years)	2321 Points +340%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Core i7-8550U	729 Points +38%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	606 (417.88^min - 605.96^max) Points +15%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U (457 - 750, n=38)	592 Points +12%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Intel Core i7-8565U	572 Points +8%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Intel Core i5-8265U	528 Points
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng Intel Core i5-8250U	505 Points -4%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U	493 Points -7%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

157 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

528 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

103.8 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Multimedia (4635 - 8670, n=85, last 2 years)	6602 Points +58%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4236 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (4190 - 4192, n=2)	4191 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng GeForce MX250, i5-8265U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G	4190 Points
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4020 Points -4%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	3711 Points -11%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	3402 Points -19%
Essentials
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=85, last 2 years)	10473 Points +25%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng GeForce MX250, i5-8265U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G	8394 Points
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (8264 - 8394, n=2)	8329 Points -1%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	8233 Points -2%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	7378 Points -12%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	7110 Points -15%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	6710 Points -20%
Productivity
Average of class Multimedia (5845 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years)	8709 Points +32%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	7212 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (6604 - 6654, n=2)	6629 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng GeForce MX250, i5-8265U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G	6604 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	6236 Points -6%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	6120 Points -7%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	5014 Points -24%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia (4688 - 13548, n=85, last 2 years)	8686 Points +141%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	3905 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3604 - 3637, n=2)	3621 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng GeForce MX250, i5-8265U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G	3604 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	3475 Points -4%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	3315 Points -8%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	3000 Points -17%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Multimedia (4484 - 5583, n=10, last 2 years)	5126 Points +42%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4220 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3603 - 4220, n=2)	3912 Points +9%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	3801 Points +5%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	3647 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	3620 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng GeForce MX250, i5-8265U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G	3603 Points
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng Vega 8, R5 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7	3404 Points -6%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5272 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng GeForce MX250, i5-8265U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G	5223 Points
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (4965 - 5223, n=2)	5094 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (3115 - 6078, n=10, last 2 years)	5081 Points -3%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	5025 Points -4%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4905 Points -6%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	4762 Points -9%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng Vega 8, R5 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7	4467 Points -14%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3603 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5223 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		4190 pontos
Ajuda

	HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	MSI PS63 Modern 8RC WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7	HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	Average Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		20%	-48%	12%	-19%	-46%	-8%
Write 4K	149.3	130.1 -13%	51.5 -66%	121.3 -19%	105.8 -29%	66.9 -55%	114.9 ?(94.8 - 149.3, n=7) -23%
Read 4K	52.7	27.64 -48%	28.53 -46%	44.07 -16%	29.22 -45%	30.33 -42%	48 ?(44.3 - 52.7, n=7) -9%
Write Seq	667	1438 116%	444.2 -33%	1176 76%	581 -13%	447.6 -33%	727 ?(667 - 883, n=7) 9%
Read Seq	818	1319 61%	477.7 -42%	1139 39%	1065 30%	534 -35%	885 ?(665 - 1068, n=7) 8%
Write 4K Q32T1	332.1	323.3 -3%	208.7 -37%	257.8 -22%	201 -39%	197.5 -41%	253 ?(167.3 - 332, n=7) -24%
Read 4K Q32T1	467.1	359.9 -23%	224.3 -52%	325.9 -30%	278.6 -40%	234.5 -50%	400 ?(307 - 496, n=7) -14%
Write Seq Q32T1	985	1454 48%	515 -48%	1455 48%	584 -41%	495.6 -50%	849 ?(657 - 1017, n=7) -14%
Read Seq Q32T1	1454	1740 20%	559 -62%	1741 20%	1824 25%	559 -62%	1493 ?(1202 - 1606, n=7) 3%
Write 4K Q8T8			207.5				536 ?()
Read 4K Q8T8			223.6				560 ?()
AS SSD		69%	-57%	69%	-6%	-24%	-13%
Seq Read	1153	1557 35%	504 -56%	1372 19%	1480 28%	522 -55%	1283 ?(1135 - 1386, n=9) 11%
Seq Write	736	1237 68%	202.7 -72%	1244 69%	540 -27%	476.1 -35%	676 ?(501 - 768, n=9) -8%
4K Read	46.51	42.56 -8%	27.67 -41%	43.34 -7%	20.36 -56%	30.14 -35%	42.7 ?(37.7 - 48.6, n=9) -8%
4K Write	114.1	127.2 11%	51.1 -55%	162.2 42%	54 -53%	64.3 -44%	87.7 ?(4.18 - 127.7, n=9) -23%
4K-64 Read	618	1034 67%	373.6 -40%	1044 69%	491.4 -20%	319.2 -48%	575 ?(210 - 644, n=9) -7%
4K-64 Write	461.4	1186 157%	173 -63%	1111 141%	390.3 -15%	239.8 -48%	270 ?(4.83 - 461, n=9) -41%
Access Time Read *	0.421	0.077 82%	0.365 13%	0.058 86%	0.138 67%	0.131 69%	0.2746 ?(0.085 - 0.92, n=9) 35%
Access Time Write *	0.233	0.028 88%	0.603 -159%	0.024 90%	0.078 67%	0.056 76%	0.3361 ?(0.157 - 1.049, n=9) -44%
Score Read	780	1233 58%	452 -42%	1224 57%	660 -15%	402 -48%	746 ?(388 - 827, n=9) -4%
Score Write	649	1437 121%	244 -62%	1398 115%	498 -23%	352 -46%	426 ?(63 - 649, n=9) -34%
Score Total	1822	3291 81%	921 -49%	3249 78%	1451 -20%	967 -47%	1536 ?(623 - 1822, n=9) -16%
Copy ISO MB/s		1313	810		491.3		761 ?(448 - 1065, n=7)
Copy Program MB/s		334.6	332.5		203.9		243 ?(106.9 - 368, n=7)
Copy Game MB/s		684	557		359.3		457 ?(314 - 727, n=7)
Total Average (Program / Settings)		45% / 48%	-53% / -53%	41% / 45%	-13% / -12%	-35% / -33%	-11% / -11%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G

Sequential Read: 798 MB/s

Sequential Write: 685 MB/s

512K Read: 637 MB/s

512K Write: 592 MB/s

4K Read: 46.16 MB/s

4K Write: 106.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 337 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 186.8 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=89, last 2 years)	18929 Points +298%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8565U	7385 Points +55%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i5-8265U	4761 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-8565U	4633 Points -3%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	4506 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3585 - 4942, n=29)	4404 Points -7%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U	2895 Points -39%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	2381 Points -50%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (14679 - 150699, n=60, last 2 years)	58293 Points +162%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8565U	36630 Points +65%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i5-8265U	22232 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-8565U	21545 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (13805 - 23863, n=25)	21491 Points -3%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	18770 Points -16%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U	13610 Points -39%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	11226 Points -50%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=90, last 2 years)	14005 Points +280%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8565U	5792 Points +57%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i5-8265U	3690 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-8565U	3616 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (2939 - 3885, n=29)	3531 Points -4%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	3517 Points -5%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U	2347 Points -36%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	1715 Points -54%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=90, last 2 years)	5310 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-8565U	1090 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (881 - 1169, n=22)	1070 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	1050 Points

3DMark 11 Performance		4994 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		13164 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3318 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia (36 - 428, n=64, last 2 years)	205 fps +215%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	65 fps
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	63.5 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (47.4 - 70, n=24)	60.8 fps -6%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	59.7 fps -8%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 327, n=64, last 2 years)	138.6 fps +275%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	37.9 fps +2%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	37 fps
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	35.3 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (30 - 40, n=27)	35.3 fps -5%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=92, last 2 years)	93.9 fps +347%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	21 fps
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	20.4 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (16.3 - 23.1, n=27)	20.1 fps -4%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	19.8 fps -6%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=99, last 2 years)	50.6 fps +216%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	16 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (9 - 16, n=24)	11.6 fps -27%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	11.4 fps -29%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	11 fps -31%

BioShock Infinite
1280x720 Very Low Preset
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	197 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (133.9 - 212, n=14)	187.3 fps -5%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	180.2 fps -9%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	139.3 fps -29%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130	135 fps -31%
1366x768 Medium Preset
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	110 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (98.4 - 117.5, n=14)	109.1 fps -1%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	107 fps -3%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	92.6 fps -16%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130	75.3 fps -32%
1366x768 High Preset
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	147.7 fps +59%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	94 fps +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (84 - 100.5, n=14)	93.6 fps +1%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	93 fps
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	80.9 fps -13%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130	64.8 (23.7^min) fps -30%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	62.1 fps +77%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (32.3 - 38.1, n=14)	35.7 fps +2%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	35 fps
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	34.8 fps -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	32 fps -9%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130	23.7 fps -32%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	197	110	93	35
Dota 2 (2013)	101	88		64
Thief (2014)	66.8	47.5	44.3	21
The Witcher 3 (2015)	65	37	21	16
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	71	39	24	20

Barulho

Ocioso		31.5 / 31.5 / 31.5 dB
Carga		42.5 / 42.5 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


40 °C	46 °C	25.6 °C
29.3 °C	42.4 °C	30 °C
30.8 °C	28.3 °C	27.6 °C

Máximo: 46 °C
Médio: 33.3 °C


39.6 °C	44 °C	44.6 °C
27.2 °C	40 °C	43 °C
27.1 °C	29.1 °C	30.1 °C

Máximo: 44.6 °C
Médio: 36.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 47 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2 °C / -3.6 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.3 / 0.8 Watt
Ocioso	4.9 / 7.9 / 10.1 Watt
Carga	60 / 38 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI PS63 Modern 8RC i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250	Average of class Multimedia
Power Consumption		-7%	3%	-50%	11%	1%	-13%	-78%
Idle Minimum *	4.9	4.4 10%	3.1 37%	6.8 -39%	4.5 8%	3.3 33%	4.1 ?(2.16 - 7.4, n=29) 16%	7.29 ?(2.2 - 34.6, n=96, last 2 years) -49%
Idle Average *	7.9	6.9 13%	6.3 20%	9.8 -24%	7.3 8%	6.1 23%	7.91 ?(4.2 - 12.4, n=29) -0%	11.8 ?(4.6 - 43, n=96, last 2 years) -49%
Idle Maximum *	10.1	9.9 2%	8.6 15%	11.4 -13%	9.4 7%	8.3 18%	10.4 ?(7 - 16.2, n=29) -3%	14.6 ?(5.6 - 44.9, n=96, last 2 years) -45%
Load Average *	60	55 8%	56.4 6%	76 -27%	34 43%	56 7%	58.6 ?(29 - 84, n=29) 2%	77.7 ?(14.3 - 147, n=95, last 2 years) -30%
Load Maximum *	38	63.4 -67%	62.7 -65%	93 -145%	41.9 -10%	67 -76%	68.9 ?(38 - 131, n=29) -81%	121 ?(47.7 - 247, n=95, last 2 years) -218%
Witcher 3 ultra *			45

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		8h 00min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 57min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 19min

	HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh	Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 42 Wh	MSI PS63 Modern 8RC i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 82 Wh	HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, 41 Wh	HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, 41 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		49%	31%	106%	22%	17%	70%
Reader / Idle	480	773 61%		838 75%	504 5%	493 3%	933 ?(506 - 1571, n=25, last 2 years) 94%
WiFi v1.3	297	414 39%	388 31%	683 130%	302 2%	284 -4%	572 ?(274 - 1204, n=95, last 2 years) 93%
Load	79	117 48%		168 113%	126 59%	121 53%	97.7 ?(39 - 215, n=76, last 2 years) 24%

Pro

+ Design premium

+ Acessível

+ Resfriamento decente

+ Bom desempenho do sistema

Contra

- PWM é utilizado para o controle do brilho

- Opções limitadas de manutenção

- Curta duração da bateria

The HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng laptop review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

O HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng é uma atualização moderada de seus irmãos e confirma nossas impressões anteriores sobre a série. O Pavilion 15 é um dispositivo bem construído que aparenta ser caro e tem uma sólida seleção de portas. O cs2019ng também oferece mais do que suficiente potência para todas as tarefas diárias e pode até mesmo lidar com alguns jogos leves. A atualização para uma CPU Whiskey Lake e a GeForce MX250 também oferece um aumento modesto no desempenho.

O HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng é um elegante portátil de 15,6 polegadas que tem muito a oferecer. Sua fraca duração de bateria e uso de PWM tiram o brilho do que é um portátil multimídia que de outra forma é competente.

Infelizmente, o cs2019ng compartilha as mesmas falhas de seus irmãos. O dispositivo tem uma duração de bateria comparativamente curta, e é difícil acessar seus componentes internos. A inclusão do PWM também é decepcionante e será problemático para algumas pessoas. No geral, o Pavilion 15-cs2019ng oferece mais potência do que seus irmãos Kaby Lake e AMD, mantendo seu design premium e bom desempenho de resfriamento.

HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng - 2019-04-21 04/21/2019 v6^(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento

76 / 98 → 78%

Teclado

72%

Mouse

88%

Conectividade

46 / 81 → 57%

Peso

64 / 20-67 → 93%

Bateria

81%

Pantalha

86%

Desempenho do jogos

78 / 85 → 91%

Desempenho da aplicação

88 / 92 → 96%

Temperatura

91%

Ruído

84 / 95 → 89%

Audio

68%

Camera

48 / 85 → 56%

Médio

75%

83%

Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 9942 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion 15 (Core i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 16 GB RAM)

Mike Wobker, 2019-04-23 (Update: 2019-04-25)

Breve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion 15 (Core i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 16 GB RAM)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare