Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion Gaming 16: Portátil barato de 16 polegadas com GPU GeForce

Dispositivo de jogos com preço razoável! Embora a HP já tenha muitos portáteis para jogos de boa qualidade em sua série Omen, o fabricante também oferece portáteis para jogos de baixo custo em sua série Pavilion. O sistema surpreende com um bom nível de desempenho e durações de bateria utilizáveis.
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng (Pavilion Gaming 16 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-10300H 4 x 2.5 - 4.5 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1350 MHz, Memoría: 6000 MHz, GDDR6, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, DDR4-3200, Dual-channel
Pantalha
16.10 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 137 PPI, BOE08F6, IPS, Brilhante: não, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, 512 GB 
, 430 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek Audio
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado fones/microfone, Card Reader: SD
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8822CE (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 23.5 x 370 x 262.5
Bateria
52 Wh Lítio-Ion, 3 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: B&O, dois alto-falantes, HP Audio Boost 1.0, Teclado: chiclet-style, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.198 kg, Suprimento de energia: 324 g
Preço
899 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
79.9 %
08/2020
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
2.2 kg23.5 mm16.10"1920x1080
83.7 %
06/2020
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M
2.4 kg21.6 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.7 %
06/2020
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.2 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.3 %
11/2019
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.6 kg21 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.3 %
07/2020
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.5 kg26.1 mm15.60"1920x1080
79.5 %
07/2020
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M
2 kg22 mm15.60"1920x1080
HP Pavilion Gaming 16
HP Pavilion Gaming 16
HP Pavilion Gaming 16
HP Pavilion Gaming 16
HP Pavilion Gaming 16
HP Pavilion Gaming 16
HP Pavilion Gaming 16

Size Comparison

370 mm 262.5 mm 23.5 mm 2.2 kg363.1 mm 259.6 mm 26.1 mm 2.5 kg365.5 mm 254 mm 21.6 mm 2.4 kg364 mm 265 mm 21 mm 2.6 kg359 mm 256 mm 24.9 mm 2.2 kg359 mm 254 mm 22 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Left side: Power socket, one USB 3.1 Gen. 1 port (Sleep-and-Charge)
Left side: Power socket, one USB 3.1 Gen. 1 port (Sleep-and-Charge)
Right side: SD card reader, 3.5-mm combination headphone/microphone jack, one USB Type-C port (5 Gbit/s; DisplayPort 1.4 over USB), Gigabit RJ-45 port, one USB 3.1 Gen. 1 port, HDMI 2.0 output
Right side: SD card reader, 3.5-mm combination headphone/microphone jack, one USB Type-C port (5 Gbit/s; DisplayPort 1.4 over USB), Gigabit RJ-45 port, one USB 3.1 Gen. 1 port, HDMI 2.0 output
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=103, last 2 years)
99 MB/s +38%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s +8%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72 MB/s
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36.6 MB/s -49%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (26 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
122.9 MB/s +37%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90 MB/s
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s -6%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.9 MB/s -58%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1385 (1268min - 1486max) MBit/s +117%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1190 MBit/s +87%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1160 MBit/s +82%
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=7, last 2 years)
1147 MBit/s +80%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
662 (553min - 769max) MBit/s +4%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Realtek RTL8822CE
638 MBit/s
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
566 (37min - 647max) MBit/s -11%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1470 (1297min - 1511max) MBit/s +129%
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=7, last 2 years)
1391 MBit/s +117%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1380 MBit/s +115%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1340 MBit/s +109%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
880 (772min - 916max) MBit/s +37%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Realtek RTL8822CE
641 MBit/s
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
630 (571min - 641max) MBit/s -2%
ColorChecker
9.7 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
6 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng: 9.44 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 19.34 ∆E
290
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE08F6 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 319 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 306 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 319 cd/m²
Contraste: 1772:1 (Preto: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 3.52
ΔE Greyscale 1.53 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
60% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.77% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.42% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
BOE08F6, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
BOE NV156FH, WVA, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE0867), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
52%
-4%
57%
-4%
49%
Display P3 Coverage
40.42
63
56%
38.92
-4%
65.2
61%
38.8
-4%
62
53%
sRGB Coverage
60.7
90.1
48%
58.5
-4%
92.1
52%
57.8
-5%
86.8
43%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
41.77
64.1
53%
40.22
-4%
66.4
59%
40.09
-4%
62.7
50%
Response Times
59%
21%
71%
42%
65%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43.2 ?(22, 21.2)
20.4 ?(10.8, 9.6)
53%
34 ?(16, 18)
21%
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
80%
26 ?(12, 14)
40%
16 ?(7.6, 8.4)
63%
Response Time Black / White *
30.4 ?(16.4, 14)
10.8 ?(6.4, 4.4)
64%
24 ?(13, 11)
21%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
61%
17 ?(8, 9)
44%
10.4 ?(6, 4.4)
66%
PWM Frequency
198.4 ?(99)
Screen
-6%
-31%
2%
-26%
-15%
Brightness middle
319
292
-8%
280
-12%
316
-1%
301
-6%
311
-3%
Brightness
306
290
-5%
254
-17%
295
-4%
277
-9%
313
2%
Brightness Distribution
91
77
-15%
88
-3%
87
-4%
77
-15%
88
-3%
Black Level *
0.18
0.27
-50%
0.15
17%
0.23
-28%
0.26
-44%
0.43
-139%
Contrast
1772
1081
-39%
1867
5%
1374
-22%
1158
-35%
723
-59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4
3.99
-0%
5.89
-47%
3.84
4%
5.12
-28%
4.5
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.18
6.11
45%
19
-70%
5.69
49%
8.86
21%
7.97
29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.52
3.02
14%
4.79
-36%
1.64
53%
4.88
-39%
2.65
25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.53
3.3
-116%
4.08
-167%
3.66
-139%
3.47
-127%
3.3
-116%
Gamma
2.39 92%
2.25 98%
2.33 94%
2.62 84%
2.37 93%
2.129 103%
CCT
6533 99%
7047 92%
7303 89%
7165 91%
7062 92%
7227 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38
58.1
53%
37
-3%
60
58%
37
-3%
63
66%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
60
89.7
50%
58
-3%
92
53%
57
-5%
86
43%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
35% / 13%
-5% / -19%
43% / 21%
4% / -14%
33% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility (Benchmark)
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng: Ø871 (865.2-901)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=241, last 2 years)
266 Points +40%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Intel Core i7-9750H
190 Points 0%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
190 Points
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
188 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
187 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
186 Points -2%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
186 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=242, last 2 years)
3024 Points +234%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1972 (1142.92min - 1972max) Points +118%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1850 Points +104%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1741 (1664.03min - 1741.33max) Points +92%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Intel Core i7-9750H
1242 Points +37%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
905 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
898 Points -1%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
514 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
485.9 Seconds * +5%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
284 Seconds * +45%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
276 Seconds * +46%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
262.5 Seconds * +49%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=235, last 2 years)
205 Seconds * +60%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=236, last 2 years)
6062 MIPS +23%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
4919 MIPS
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
4903 MIPS 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4666 MIPS -5%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4666 MIPS -5%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4584 MIPS -7%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=236, last 2 years)
75363 MIPS +204%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
49685 MIPS +101%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
47520 MIPS +92%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
45679 MIPS +84%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
24772 MIPS
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
24635 MIPS -1%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=237, last 2 years)
693 Points +49%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
485 Points +4%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
482 Points +3%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
477 Points +2%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
466 Points
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Intel Core i7-9750H
460 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
459 Points -2%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=237, last 2 years)
7255 Points +243%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4396 Points +108%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4257 Points +101%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
3956 Points +87%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Intel Core i7-9750H
2588 Points +22%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
2217 Points +5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
2117 Points
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2193, n=241, last 2 years)
1795 Points +47%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
1225 Points
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
1224 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
1220 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1166 Points -5%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1158 Points -5%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1154 Points -6%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=241, last 2 years)
13326 Points +182%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
7775 Points +64%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
7453 Points +58%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
5920 Points +25%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
4728 Points
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
4701 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
4640 Points -2%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=239, last 2 years)
20.8 fps +183%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
12.6 fps +71%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
11.7 fps +59%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
10.8 fps +47%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
7.69 fps +5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
7.35 fps
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
93.9 s * -71%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
69.1 s * -26%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
54.8 s *
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
52.6 s * +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=233, last 2 years)
49.1 s * +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
28.6 s * +48%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.634 sec * -0%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.634 sec *
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.603 sec * +5%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.597 sec * +6%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.569 sec * +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=236, last 2 years)
0.4734 sec * +25%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7130
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6836 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
35899 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
9326 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6836
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
27692
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
9.32 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
79.3 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.16 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
10.06 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
79.9 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
1.92 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
129.3 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
905 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=203, last 2 years)
7573 Points +56%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
5936 Points +22%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5681 Points +17%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5639 Points +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
5095 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
4887 Points 0%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4868 Points
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4166 - 6657, n=36, last 2 years)
5264 Points +18%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
4894 Points +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
4698 Points +5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4455 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
3984 Points -11%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4622 - 7085, n=35, last 2 years)
6098 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
5773 Points +12%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
5352 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
5319 Points +3%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5176 Points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4455 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6793 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5176 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
4868 pontos
Ajuda
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3371 μs *

* ... smaller is better

HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
AS SSD
17%
11%
114%
29%
155%
Seq Read
1438
1386
-4%
1682
17%
2772
93%
2012
40%
2730
90%
Seq Write
905
1234
36%
904
0%
2489
175%
1261
39%
2513
178%
4K Read
50.3
41.32
-18%
60.2
20%
48.62
-3%
43.66
-13%
61.4
22%
4K Write
111.7
128
15%
164.8
48%
136.6
22%
109.3
-2%
156.1
40%
4K-64 Read
324
854
164%
472.5
46%
1393
330%
851
163%
1780
449%
4K-64 Write
729
721
-1%
845
16%
1450
99%
780
7%
1920
163%
Access Time Read *
0.105
0.098
7%
0.087
17%
0.088
16%
0.117
-11%
0.063
40%
Access Time Write *
0.047
0.095
-102%
0.02
57%
0.03
36%
0.036
23%
0.025
47%
Score Read
518
1034
100%
701
35%
1719
232%
1096
112%
2114
308%
Score Write
931
973
5%
1101
18%
1835
97%
1016
9%
2327
150%
Score Total
1707
2536
49%
2143
26%
4424
159%
2643
55%
5518
223%
Copy ISO MB/s
1145
1284
12%
675
-41%
1481
29%
Copy Program MB/s
602
401.9
-33%
248.4
-59%
467.5
-22%
Copy Game MB/s
929
1013
9%
535
-42%
734
-21%

* ... smaller is better

Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Sequential Read: 1438MB/s
Sequential Write: 905MB/s
4K Read: 50.3MB/s
4K Write: 111.7MB/s
4K-64 Read: 324MB/s
4K-64 Write: 729MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.105ms
Access Time Write: 0.047ms
Copy ISO: 1145MB/s
Copy Program: 602MB/s
Copy Game: 929MB/s
Score Read: 518Points
Score Write: 931Points
Score Total: 1707Points

Continuous read speed: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=241, last 2 years)
39928 Points +204%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
25706 Points +95%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
21542 Points +64%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
21480 Points +63%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
21303 Points +62%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
14437 Points +10%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
13150 Points
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=150, last 2 years)
135325 Points +105%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
106538 Points +62%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
98425 Points +49%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
72335 Points +10%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
65867 Points
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
55837 Points -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
55325 Points -16%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=245, last 2 years)
29195 Points +199%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
18807 Points +92%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
16571 Points +69%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
15967 Points +63%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
15609 Points +60%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
10550 Points +8%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
9779 Points
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=243, last 2 years)
11907 Points +232%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
6312 Points +76%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6164 Points +72%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6109 Points +70%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6043 Points +68%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
3587 Points
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
3539 Points -1%
3DMark 11 Performance
12461 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
101019 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
27911 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8780 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
4315 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
3748 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=172, last 2 years)
216 fps +212%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H
124.8 fps +80%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
113 (95min) fps +63%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
105 (90min - 115max) fps +52%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
103.6 (92min - 110max) fps +50%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H
69.2 (63min - 78max) fps
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H
60 (48min) fps -13%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=238, last 2 years)
115.1 fps +214%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H
68.3 fps +87%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
66.1 (62min - 70max) fps +81%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
60.6 (50min) fps +66%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
60.5 (51min - 68max) fps +65%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H
38.3 (31min) fps +5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H
36.6 (28min) fps
05101520253035Tooltip
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø36.7 (34-39)
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 309 251 227 99
GTA V (2015) 173 165 107 53.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 202 123 69.2 36.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 136.2 123.8 117.1 113
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 181 124 68.3 58.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 107 55.2 40.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 90.1 81.4 69.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 119 67 62 58
Strange Brigade (2018) 230 95 75.2 62.7
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 104 66 62 57
Borderlands 3 (2019) 122 63.4 40.8 30.5

Barulho

Ocioso
25 / 33 / 42 dB
Carga
48 / 54 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.441.438.943.336.338.82531.834.836.33737.938.13139.24344.242.943.541.1402930.833.831.926.428.55033.324.828.922.519.635.36329.228.6302428.626.48024.120.922.718.316.331.91002418.423.416.315.92712526.517.625.41915.328.816029.519.427.918.517.334.320031.828.22822.32134.725030.120.827.717.71533.431532.420.228.116.313.736.540033.321.328.213.212375003423.229.512.312.138.263035.523.431.811.511.339.780035.122.731.511.511.539.9100035.221.531.211.911.839.8125035.821.531.811.41140.4160037.221.732.112.511.442.4200036.822.231.312.111.842.425003923.733.713.312.544.5315036.419.430.612.512.342400036.517.228.513.512.943.3500036.217.228.114.414.643.7630033.716.125.815.414.741.3800030.416.823.216.41638.31000027.114.421.414.313.534.91250025.216.121.315.812.732.6160002314.919.214.311.928.6SPL47.93342.425.825.253.6N6.21.74.10.70.79.2median 33.7median 20.2median 28.1median 14.3median 12.7median 38.3Delta4.22.83.82.524.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
 46 °C49 °C48 °C 
 33 °C49 °C49 °C 
 27 °C40 °C41 °C 
Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 42.4 °C
50 °C49 °C37 °C
49 °C40 °C30 °C
38 °C35 °C30 °C
Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 39.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  61 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.339.72537.938.13143.549.44026.432.35019.630.56328.629.68016.318.610015.917.812515.327.616017.341.32002147.62501557.131513.758.4400126050012.163.163011.361.780011.563.3100011.863.812501165160011.461.3200011.861250012.562.4315012.363.5400012.966.7500014.667.3630014.761.980001657.61000013.553.91250012.754.41600011.948.5SPL25.275.4N0.736.8median 12.7median 61Delta27.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3 / 7 / 18 Watt
Carga midlight 86 / 144 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-40%
-36%
-79%
-15%
-71%
-137%
Idle Minimum *
3
6.5
-117%
5.4
-80%
10
-233%
3.2
-7%
11
-267%
13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=185, last 2 years)
-360%
Idle Average *
7
10.6
-51%
10
-43%
13
-86%
8.3
-19%
14
-100%
19.1 ?(8 - 67, n=185, last 2 years)
-173%
Idle Maximum *
18
11
39%
10.5
42%
20
-11%
8.7
52%
25
-39%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=185, last 2 years)
-48%
Load Average *
86
84.1
2%
135
-57%
100
-16%
82
5%
72
16%
111.2 ?(32.1 - 202, n=185, last 2 years)
-29%
Witcher 3 ultra *
82
152.9
-86%
144
-76%
159
-94%
151
-84%
100
-22%
Load Maximum *
144
180.4
-25%
147
-2%
196
-36%
195
-35%
163
-13%
250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=184, last 2 years)
-74%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
16h 32min
WiFi Websurfing (84.0.522.52)
8h 16min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (84.0.522.52)
6h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 51min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 00min
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, 52 Wh
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M, 51 Wh
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48 Wh
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 55 Wh
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M, 51 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-28%
-27%
-57%
-14%
-53%
-32%
Reader / Idle
992
671
-32%
587
-41%
370
-63%
848
-15%
418
-58%
541 ?(57 - 1290, n=87, last 2 years)
-45%
H.264
531
322
-39%
554
4%
391 ?(56 - 747, n=95, last 2 years)
-26%
WiFi v1.3
496
372
-25%
370
-25%
264
-47%
433
-13%
268
-46%
364 ?(57 - 745, n=188, last 2 years)
-27%
Load
120
87
-27%
116
-3%
48
-60%
84
-30%
53
-56%
85.5 ?(36 - 173, n=150, last 2 years)
-29%
Maximum battery life
Maximum battery life
Minimum battery life
Minimum battery life
Battery runtime in the Wi-Fi test (70% brightness)
Battery runtime in the Wi-Fi test (70% brightness)
Battery runtime in the Wi-Fi test (100% brightness)
Battery runtime in the Wi-Fi test (100% brightness)
Battery runtime in the H.264 video test
Battery runtime in the H.264 video test
Charging time
Charging time

Pro

+ Design chique
+ Rápido o suficiente para jogos em Full HD
+ 16 GB de RAM
+ SSD veloz
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Preço
+ Teclado iluminado
+ Leitor de cartões SD

Contra

- 4 GB de VRAM
- Sem Wi-Fi 6
- Cobertura pobre do espaço de cores
- Tempos de resposta lentos

Veredicto - Bom desempenho, baixo preço

O HP Pavilion Gaming 16 é um portátil para jogos de baixo custo com bom hardware. Apesar de uma tela maior, o dispositivo é pouco maior do que portáteis de 15,6 polegadas comparáveis. Demos uma olhada na configuração com o Intel Core i5-10300H e a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti. Atualmente, nosso dispositivo de análise é vendido por cerca de 900 Euros (~$ 1068), o que é inteiramente justificado dadas as especificações. A quantidade de espaço de armazenamento pode ser criticada, porque 512 GB não é muito para um portátil de jogos. No entanto, os usuários podem expandir facilmente a capacidade de armazenamento. Em nossa análise, o Pavilion Gaming 16 apresentou um bom nível de desempenho, embora a GeForce GTX 1650 Ti seja uma placa de vídeo dedicada de baixo custo. Tendo dito isso, a GPU ainda é poderosa o suficiente para ser capaz de rodar muitos videogames a 1080p nas configurações mais altas.

O HP Pavilion Gaming 16 é um portátil para jogos com uma ótima relação preço-desempenho.

Os usuários terão que se contentar com um desempenho multi-core relativamente pobre, porque o Core i5-10300H tem apenas quatro núcleos. Quando se trata de portas, o Pavilion Gaming 16 oferece o mínimo. Uma porta USB Tipo A adicional seria útil. Wi-Fi 6 também seria uma inclusão bem-vinda. No entanto, nosso dispositivo de análise vem com 16 GB de RAM e uma tela IPS com uma boa relação de contraste.

The review of the HP Pavilion Gaming 16, device provided courtesy of: HP Germany.
The review of the HP Pavilion Gaming 16, device provided courtesy of: HP Germany.

The HP Pavilion Gaming 16 is a low-priced gaming notebook with good hardware. Despite a bigger screen, the device is barely larger than comparable 15.6-inch laptops. We have taken a close look at the configuration with the Intel Core i5-10300H and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti. Currently, our review device retails for about 900 Euros (~$1068), which is entirely justified given the specifications. The amount of storage space can be criticised, because 512 GB is not much for a gaming laptop. However, users can easily expand storage capacity. In our review, the Pavilion Gaming 16 delivered a good level of performance, even though the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is a low-end dedicated graphics card. Having said that, the GPU is still powerful enough to be able to run many video games at 1080p on the highest settings.

The HP Pavilion Gaming 16 is a gaming notebook with a very good price-to-performance ratio.

Users will have to make do with relatively poor multi-core performance, because the Core i5-10300H has only four cores. When it comes to the ports, the Pavilion Gaming 16 offers the bare minimum. An additional USB Type-A port would have come in handy. Wi-Fi 6 would also be a welcome inclusion. However, our review device comes with 16 GB of RAM and an IPS display with a good contrast ratio.

HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng - 08/19/2020 v7
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento
74 / 98 → 76%
Teclado
77%
Mouse
75%
Conectividade
54 / 80 → 68%
Peso
62 / 10-66 → 92%
Bateria
80 / 95 → 84%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
87%
Desempenho da aplicação
90%
Temperatura
84 / 95 → 88%
Ruído
63 / 90 → 70%
Audio
70%
Camera
46 / 85 → 54%
Médio
73%
80%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion Gaming 16: Portátil barato de 16 polegadas com GPU GeForce
Sebastian Bade, 2020-08-22 (Update: 2021-03-12)