Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil HP ProBook 455 G3 T1B79UT

Allen Ngo, 01/03/2017

AMD empresarial econômico. O modelo AMD está a partir de $200 USD a menos que o Intel ProBook 450 equivalente. infelizmente, a influência no desempenho e duração da bateria quando comparado com sua CPU ULV Core ix padrão, é muito tangível.

HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT (ProBook 455 Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) - 512 MB, Análises do: 720 MHz, Memoría: 800 MHz, DDR3, 2015.0821.1030.17037
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR3-1600, Single-Channel, 2x SODIMM
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1366x768 pixel 100 PPI, TN, ID: Chi Mei CMN15BE, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
AMD CZ FCH
Disco rígido
Toshiba MQ01ACF050, 500 GB 
, 7200 rpm
Placa de Som
AMD Kabini - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: Leitor SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0
Unidade ótica
Slimtype DVD A DU8A6SH
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 25 x 378 x 265
Bateria
44 Wh, 4-cell
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, HP Client Security, 3D DriveGuard, DTS Audio Control Panel, AMD Catalyst Control Center, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.15 kg, Suprimento de energia: 258 g
Preço
500 USD

 

Front: SD reader
Front: SD reader
Right: Optical drive, 3.5 mm combo audio, 2x USB 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet
Right: Optical drive, 3.5 mm combo audio, 2x USB 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: Kensington Lock, AC adapter, VGA-out, HDMI-out, 2x USB 3.0
Left: Kensington Lock, AC adapter, VGA-out, HDMI-out, 2x USB 3.0
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT73VR 6RF
155.1 MB/s ∼100% +185%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
107.8 MB/s ∼70% +98%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
54.5 MB/s ∼35%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
250.6 MB/s ∼100% +211%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
209.4 MB/s ∼84% +160%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
80.6 MB/s ∼32%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
525 MBit/s ∼100% +492%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
309 MBit/s ∼59% +248%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
88.7 MBit/s ∼17%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
575 MBit/s ∼100% +573%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
344 MBit/s ∼60% +302%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
85.5 MBit/s ∼15%
264.9
cd/m²
259.9
cd/m²
245.7
cd/m²
216.1
cd/m²
245.3
cd/m²
195.1
cd/m²
229.8
cd/m²
233.6
cd/m²
191.5
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 264.9 cd/m² Médio: 231.3 cd/m² Minimum: 11.33 cd/m²
iluminação: 72 %
iluminação com acumulador: 245.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 598:1 (Preto: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 11.1 | - Ø
66.1% sRGB (Argyll) 42.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.27
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
TN, 15.6, 1366x768
HP 15z-ba000
BOE06A4, TN, 15.6, 1366x768
Dell Latitude 15-3570
LG Philips LGD04AF / 156WHU, TN LED, 15.6, 1366x768
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE
Lenovo N156B6-L07, TN LED, 15.6, 1366x768
Asus F555UB-XO043T
AU Optronics B156XTN04.6, TN LED, 15.6, 1366x768
Response Times
67%
-1%
7%
-22%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45.2 (23.2, 22)
41.2 (18.4, 22.8)
9%
37 (13, 24)
18%
50 (20, 30)
-11%
46 (24, 22)
-2%
Response Time Black / White *
30.8 (11.2, 19.6)
33.6 (14.8, 18.8)
-9%
37 (20, 17)
-20%
23 (7, 16)
25%
27 (10, 17, Spikes in between)
12%
PWM Frequency
198.4 (99)
595.2 (99)
200%
50 (60)
-75%
Screen
3%
-19%
-11%
1%
Brightness
231
232
0%
211
-9%
226
-2%
205
-11%
Brightness Distribution
72
80
11%
88
22%
89
24%
82
14%
Black Level *
0.41
0.385
6%
0.62
-51%
0.48
-17%
0.46
-12%
Contrast
598
635
6%
326
-45%
502
-16%
465
-22%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
9.4
8.62
8%
12.35
-31%
12.43
-32%
6.52
31%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
11.1
9.8
12%
13.46
-21%
13.24
-19%
7.05
36%
Gamma
2.27 106%
2.09 115%
2.44 98%
2.61 92%
2.41 100%
CCT
12802 51%
11391 57%
15217 43%
15733 41%
8623 75%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
42.3
39.86
-6%
39
-8%
36
-15%
36.6
-13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
66.1
57.71
-13%
61
-8%
57
-14%
57.8
-13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
35% / 20%
-10% / -15%
-2% / -8%
-11% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.2 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.2 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 198.4 Hz99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6577 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
124 Points ∼64% +65%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
117 Points ∼60% +56%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
108 Points ∼55% +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
99 Points ∼51% +32%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
AMD A10-8700P
75 Points ∼38%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
37 Points ∼19% -51%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
318 Points ∼15% +61%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
294 Points ∼14% +48%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
257 Points ∼12% +30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
223 Points ∼10% +13%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
AMD A10-8700P
198 Points ∼9%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
68 Points ∼3% -66%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.45 Points ∼66% +63%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
1.33 Points ∼60% +49%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
1.28 Points ∼58% +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
1.14 Points ∼52% +28%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
AMD A10-8700P
0.89 Points ∼40%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
0.41 Points ∼19% -54%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.61 Points ∼15% +53%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
3.24 Points ∼14% +37%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
2.81 Points ∼12% +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
2.49 Points ∼10% +6%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
AMD A10-8700P
2.36 Points ∼10%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
0.86 Points ∼4% -64%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
4910 Points ∼55% +106%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
4396 Points ∼50% +84%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
4134 Points ∼47% +73%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
3725 Points ∼42% +56%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
AMD A10-8700P
2389 Points ∼27%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
1216 Points ∼14% -49%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
10964 Points ∼22% +72%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
10003 Points ∼20% +57%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
8672 Points ∼17% +36%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
7580 Points ∼15% +19%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
AMD A10-8700P
6357 Points ∼13%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
2256 Points ∼5% -65%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
1361.23 s * ∼16% -167%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
790 s * ∼9% -55%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
AMD A10-8700P
509.409 s * ∼6%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
1566.11 Seconds * ∼7% -46%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
AMD A10-8700P
1071.86 Seconds * ∼5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
849 Seconds * ∼4% +21%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
642.8 Seconds * ∼3% +40%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
4507
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
6357
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
2389
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
17.75 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.36 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.89 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
23.17 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
198 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
75 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4568 Points ∼70% +30%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4463 Points ∼69% +27%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
4249 Points ∼65% +21%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
3511 Points ∼54%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
GeForce 820M, 4200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive
3497 Points ∼54% 0%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1464 Points ∼22% -58%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4211 Points ∼45% +36%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3760 Points ∼40% +22%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
3735 Points ∼40% +21%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
3086 Points ∼33%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
GeForce 820M, 4200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive
2676 Points ∼29% -13%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1779 Points ∼19% -42%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
3535 Points ∼59% +37%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3472 Points ∼58% +35%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
3237 Points ∼54% +26%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
2577 Points ∼43%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
GeForce 820M, 4200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive
2484 Points ∼42% -4%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1661 Points ∼28% -36%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2577 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3086 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3511 pontos
Ajuda
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
Toshiba MQ01ACF050
HP 15z-ba000
Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE
Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX)
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
4322%
1964%
-7%
8581%
Write 4k QD32
1.224
132.8
10750%
23.3
1804%
1.285
5%
237.3
19287%
Read 4k QD32
1.174
164.3
13895%
93.53
7867%
0.976
-17%
384.8
32677%
Write 4k
1.304
52.33
3913%
21.31
1534%
1.29
-1%
106.7
8083%
Read 4k
0.53
26.11
4826%
19.06
3496%
0.373
-30%
36.01
6694%
Write 512
62.01
172.3
178%
134.1
116%
66.77
8%
316.5
410%
Read 512
43.07
367.5
753%
308.5
616%
34.31
-20%
409.8
851%
Write Seq
121.8
171.4
41%
137.7
13%
123.1
1%
508
317%
Read Seq
124.3
397.9
220%
453.2
265%
120.4
-3%
528.9
326%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 68.5 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 126.7 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média: 103.1 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso: 15.1 ms
Índice de Explosão: 158.6 MB/s
Uso da CPU: 6.4 %
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
1525 Points ∼10% +55%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1483 Points ∼9% +51%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
1401 Points ∼9% +42%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U
1191 Points ∼7% +21%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
985 Points ∼6%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
414 Points ∼3% -58%
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
1834 Points ∼4% +27%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1545 Points ∼3% +7%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
1443 Points ∼3%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
1343 Points ∼3% -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U
1265 Points ∼2% -12%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
382 Points ∼1% -74%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
1010 Points ∼2% +21%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
963 Points ∼2% +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U
897 Points ∼2% +7%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
835 Points ∼2%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
786 Points ∼2% -6%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
8177 Points ∼5% +78%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
6924 Points ∼4% +51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U
6106 Points ∼4% +33%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
5592 Points ∼3% +22%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
4597 Points ∼3%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
1907 Points ∼1% -59%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
49119 Points ∼7% +54%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
37343 Points ∼5% +17%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P
31961 Points ∼4%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
14334 Points ∼2% -55%
3DMark 11 Performance
1457 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
36716 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
3463 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
736 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
373 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite
1366x768 High Preset
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
23.3 fps ∼100% +21%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
22.2 fps ∼95% +16%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
19.2 fps ∼82%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
16.6 fps ∼71% -14%
Asus UX32LA-R3025H
HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, SanDisk SD6SB1M128G1002
14.76 fps ∼63% -23%
1366x768 Medium Preset
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
28.1 fps ∼100% +15%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
26.8 fps ∼95% +10%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
24.4 fps ∼87%
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Kingston RBU-SC150S37256GD
24.1 fps ∼86% -1%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
20.1 fps ∼72% -18%
Asus UX32LA-R3025H
HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, SanDisk SD6SB1M128G1002
17.9 fps ∼64% -27%
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
50.9 fps ∼100% +24%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
49.2 fps ∼97% +20%
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX
HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Kingston RBU-SC150S37256GD
44.6 fps ∼88% +9%
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
40.9 fps ∼80%
Asus UX32LA-R3025H
HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, SanDisk SD6SB1M128G1002
35.8 fps ∼70% -12%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
35.6 fps ∼70% -13%
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 40.924.419.2fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 15.4fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 16.8fps
Overwatch (2016) 26.1fps

Barulho

Ocioso
32.4 / 32.4 / 32.5 dB
Carga
35.5 / 36.6 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.8 dB(A)
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
HP 15z-ba000
Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
Dell Latitude 15-3570
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX)
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
Radeon R7 M460, 7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Noise
-0%
3%
-3%
0%
off / environment *
28.8
28.6
1%
31
-8%
31.2
-8%
30.15
-5%
Idle Minimum *
32.4
31.6
2%
31
4%
32.3
-0%
30.2
7%
Idle Average *
32.4
31.6
2%
31
4%
32.3
-0%
30.2
7%
Idle Maximum *
32.5
31.6
3%
31
5%
32.5
-0%
31
5%
Load Average *
35.5
37.2
-5%
34.2
4%
36
-1%
38
-7%
Load Maximum *
36.6
38.2
-4%
34.3
6%
38.8
-6%
38.6
-5%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 38.2 °C44 °C22.4 °C 
 26.6 °C34.6 °C22.6 °C 
 25.2 °C25.8 °C23 °C 
Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 29.2 °C
23.4 °C33.4 °C35.8 °C
24.8 °C38.2 °C42 °C
23.8 °C25 °C31.8 °C
Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 30.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  40 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.935.22536.835.63133.734.14031.932.45031.331.86331.432.18029.930.710029.230.112531.131.416028.52920026.828.725025.938.131525.350.740025.660.150024.561.66302462.880024.861.1100026.167.4125024.270.316002469.9200023.164.1250022.661.4315022.758.5400022.862.4500022.565.6630022.666.8800022.564.61000022.564.71250022.6571600022.750.6SPL35.877.6N2.539.6median 24HP ProBook 455 T1B79UTmedian 61.4Delta2.28.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 20%, worst was 48%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.56 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5.9 / 8.2 / 9.9 Watt
Carga midlight 37.5 / 41 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Toshiba MQ01ACF050, TN, 1366x768, 15.6
HP 15z-ba000
A6-7310, Radeon R4 (Beema), Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B, TN, 1366x768, 15.6
Dell Latitude 15-3570
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE
6100U, HD Graphics 520, Western Digital WD Black Mobile 500GB (WD5000LPLX), TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
7200U, Radeon R7 M460, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
29%
23%
23%
9%
Idle Minimum *
5.9
5.22
12%
4.9
17%
5.2
12%
3.9
34%
Idle Average *
8.2
5.67
31%
7.2
12%
7.25
12%
7.8
5%
Idle Maximum *
9.9
7.82
21%
7.5
24%
7.9
20%
8.4
15%
Load Average *
37.5
19.67
48%
25.4
32%
25.1
33%
37
1%
Load Maximum *
41
26.72
35%
28
32%
25.1
39%
46
-12%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
9h 32min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
4h 00min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 05min
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT
A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 44 Wh
HP 15z-ba000
A6-7310, Radeon R4 (Beema), 31 Wh
Dell Latitude 15-3570
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000MGE
6100U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE
7200U, Radeon R7 M460, 35 Wh
Battery Runtime
23%
116%
111%
33%
Reader / Idle
572
511
-11%
1024
79%
885
55%
WiFi v1.3
240
247
3%
542
126%
566
136%
320
33%
Load
65
115
77%
157
142%
157
142%

Pro

+ Base relativamente forte; aprovado contra padrões MIL-STD
+ RAM, HD, módulos WLAN de fácil acesso
+ Teclado confortável; iluminação de fundo opcional
+ VGA, HDMI, e unidade ótica
+ Bateria removível
+ HP BIOSphere
+ Econômico

Contra

- Visibilidade pobre em exteriores; a iluminação da tela poderia ser mais brilhante
- PWM em todos os níveis de brilho, exceto no máximo
- Touchpad pequeno; Teclas do mouse suaves
- GPU e CPU pouco impressionante
- Apenas uma baia de armazenamento interno
- Ventoinha do sistema sempre ativa
- Sem USB Type-C ou WWAN
- A tampa da tela se sente frágil
- Curta duração da bateria
- Teclado morno
- Sem TrackPoint
In review: HP ProBook 455 G3 T1B79UT
In review: HP ProBook 455 G3 T1B79UT

A plataforma AMD Carrizo para portáteis supostamente deveria ser muito versátil com o seu TDP configurável. Seu desempenho aqui, no entanto, é consideravelmente mais lento que inclusive o antigo Core i5-4200U de três gerações atrás. A GPU Radeon R6 integrada pinta uma historia similar quando comparada com a HD Graphics 520 comum ou a HD Graphics 5500 como se encontra em hardware Intel antigo.

As desvantagens do desempenho da AMD teriam sido aceitáveis se o ProBook 455 funcionasse significantemente mais silencioso e durante mais tempo como resultado, mas este definitivamente não é o caso. As temperaturas da superfície não são das mais frias e a duração da bateria é ainda mais curta do esperado.

Fora o processador, o ProBook 455 funciona bem como uma oferta de barebone destinado para uso pouco exigente. Ele não brilha com o conceito nem com o design e estamos esperando que as revisões futuras, pelo menos, adicionem alguma funcionalidade ao hardware, incluindo as opções de USB Tipo C e TrackPoint

É difícil recomendar o SKU Carrizo quando as opções Intel Core ix mais antigas podem superar e ultrapassar o que a AMD tem a oferecer em sua geração atual.

HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT - 12/15/2016 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
83 / 98 → 85%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
84%
Conectividade
45 / 80 → 56%
Peso
62 / 67 → 89%
Bateria
75%
Pantalha
76%
Desempenho do jogos
54 / 68 → 80%
Desempenho da aplicação
62 / 92 → 68%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
89%
Audio
59%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Médio
70%
79%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP ProBook 455 G3 T1B79UT
Allen Ngo, 2017-01- 3 (Update: 2017-01-18)