Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad T490s (i5, Low Power FHD)

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/20/2019

Mais fino, mas será que isso o torna melhor. É um pouco surpreendente que o ThinkPad T490s tenha um novo chassi dado que o fabricante já redesenhou o modelo no ano passado. Há mais mudanças, mas nem todas são positivas. Analisamos o novo ThinkPad T490s com a tela Low Power 1080p.

Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Processador
Intel Core i5-8265U
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Análises do: 1100 MHz, Memoría: 1200 MHz
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, soldada
Pantalha
14 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, B140HAN05.7, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disco rígido
Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, 512 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: Conector estéreo de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD UHS-II, 1 eSata, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 16.1 x 329 x 225.8
Bateria
57 Wh Lítio-Ion
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo (2x1W), Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 65W USB-C-PSU, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
1.27 kg, Suprimento de energia: 336 g
Preço
1259 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

332.6 mm 234 mm 19 mm 1.6 kg331 mm 227 mm 19 mm 1.4 kg331 mm 220.9 mm 17.9 mm 1.6 kg329 mm 227 mm 18.9 mm 1.5 kg329 mm 225.8 mm 16.1 mm 1.3 kg326 mm 234 mm 17.9 mm 1.5 kg323 mm 217 mm 15 mm 1.1 kg
ThinkPad T490s (left) vs. ThinkPad T490 (right)
ThinkPad T490s (left) vs. ThinkPad T490 (right)
ThinkPad T490s (left) vs. ThinkPad T490 (right)
ThinkPad T490s (left) vs. ThinkPad T490 (right)
ThinkPad T490s (left) vs. ThinkPad T490 (right)
ThinkPad T490s (left) vs. ThinkPad T490 (right)
ThinkPad T490s (top) vs. ThinkPad T490 (bottom)
ThinkPad T490s (left) vs. ThinkPad T490 (right)
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 7490
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
137.6 MB/s ∼100% +101%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.08 MB/s ∼59% +19%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72.8 MB/s ∼53% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
68.3 MB/s ∼50%
Average of class Office
  (10.2 - 191, n=267)
60.7 MB/s ∼44% -11%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 7490
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
203.2 MB/s ∼100% +131%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
87.8 MB/s ∼43%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.32 MB/s ∼43% -1%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.7 MB/s ∼41% -6%
Average of class Office
  (9.5 - 255, n=242)
77 MB/s ∼38% -12%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
650 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
648 MBit/s ∼100%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
644 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
624 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
620 MBit/s ∼95% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
540 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Average of class Office
  (5 - 688, n=210)
462 MBit/s ∼71% -29%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
667 MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
529 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
523 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
513 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
494 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
455 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Average of class Office
  (34 - 688, n=210)
437 MBit/s ∼66% -34%
414
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
379
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 414 cd/m² Médio: 389.4 cd/m² Minimum: 6 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 391 cd/m²
Contraste: 1700:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 62.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
B140HAN05.7, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
NV140FHM-N46, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00
NE140FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Lenovo LEN40A9 / AUO B140HAK02.3, , 1920x1080, 14
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
LG, LP140WF6-SPF1, , 1920x1080, 14
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
AUO3B3D, , 1920x1080, 14
Dell Latitude 7490
AUO503D (D04YD_B140HAN), , 1920x1080, 14
Response Times
21%
-19%
36%
37%
25%
25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
61.6 (30.8, 30.8)
44 (26, 18)
29%
74 (33.6, 40.4)
-20%
40 (18, 22)
35%
39.2 (20.4, 18.8)
36%
42.4 (19.6, 22.8)
31%
41.6 (22, 19.6)
32%
Response Time Black / White *
38.8 (21.2, 17.6)
34 (18.8, 15.2)
12%
45.6 (22.8, 22.8)
-18%
25 (14, 11)
36%
24.4 (12.8, 11.6)
37%
31.6 (18, 13.6)
19%
32 (16.4, 15.6)
18%
PWM Frequency
990.1
2451 (50)
Screen
-82%
-24%
-0%
-12%
-33%
-37%
Brightness middle
391
288.3
-26%
418
7%
298
-24%
334
-15%
414
6%
308.6
-21%
Brightness
389
281
-28%
400
3%
287
-26%
313
-20%
387
-1%
294
-24%
Brightness Distribution
87
86
-1%
88
1%
91
5%
89
2%
87
0%
89
2%
Black Level *
0.23
0.21
9%
0.24
-4%
0.2
13%
0.41
-78%
0.25
-9%
0.23
-0%
Contrast
1700
1373
-19%
1742
2%
1490
-12%
815
-52%
1656
-3%
1342
-21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.4
6.16
-81%
4.7
-38%
2.19
36%
2.2
35%
5.5
-62%
6.07
-79%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.7
18.99
-304%
8.7
-85%
4.39
7%
5.7
-21%
9.9
-111%
10.58
-125%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.1
4.51
-310%
2.1
-91%
1.67
-52%
2.3
-109%
1.67
-52%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4
6.3
-58%
5.9
-48%
1.97
51%
2.9
27%
6.4
-60%
7.3
-83%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.517 87%
2.06 107%
2.43 91%
2.34 94%
2.31 95%
2.061 107%
CCT
6809 95%
6886 94%
7350 88%
6571 99%
6855 95%
7811 83%
7269 89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62.4
37.67
-40%
59.9
-4%
62
-1%
65.3
5%
56.9
-9%
62
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.4
58.9
-40%
92.1
-5%
95
-2%
91.8
-6%
88.1
-10%
97
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-31% / -66%
-22% / -23%
18% / 5%
13% / -4%
-4% / -24%
-6% / -27%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 17.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
61.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 30.8 ms rise
↘ 30.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9524 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø584 (566.02-686.12)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø672 (635.4-707.09)
Fujitsu LifeBook U748 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø508 (501.47-546.37)
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø510 (500.33-582.81)
Dell Latitude 7490 Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel Core i5-8350U: Ø531 (519.92-595.49)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U; undervolted: Ø657 (651.36-692.5)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø606 (601.59-638.02)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel Core i5-8265U
162 Points ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel Core i5-8350U
153 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U
  (111 - 163, n=19)
153 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Core i5-8350U
150 Points ∼93% -7%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼89% -11%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼88% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Office
  (20 - 193, n=518)
111 Points ∼69% -31%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
716 Points ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel Core i5-8265U
686 (min: 566.02, max: 686.12) Points ∼96%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel Core i5-8350U
631 Points ∼88% -8%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U
  (483 - 750, n=21)
611 Points ∼85% -11%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel Core i5-8250U
583 Points ∼81% -15%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel Core i5-8350U
569 Points ∼79% -17%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel Core i5-8250U
553 Points ∼77% -19%
Average of class Office
  (36 - 1050, n=524)
336 Points ∼47% -51%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
686 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
56.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
162 Points
Ajuda
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø584 (566.02-686.12)
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U; Undervolting: Ø639 (620.19-749.93)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø705 (655.21-720.75)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U; undervolted: Ø708 (702.84-711.63)
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3210 Points ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3082 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
3024 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2620 - 3210, n=16)
2977 Points ∼93% -7%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
2911 Points ∼91% -9%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
2807 Points ∼87% -13%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2761 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Office
  (320 - 3884, n=135)
2598 Points ∼81% -19%
Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
6441 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5931 - 6556, n=16)
6234 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
6140 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6053 Points ∼94% -6%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
5844 Points ∼91% -9%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
5721 Points ∼89% -11%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5548 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Office
  (1266 - 7964, n=135)
5413 Points ∼84% -16%
Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
8361 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (7471 - 8395, n=16)
7893 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7805 Points ∼93% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
7799 Points ∼93% -7%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
7376 Points ∼88% -12%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
7139 Points ∼85% -15%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7099 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Office
  (2683 - 8992, n=135)
6874 Points ∼82% -18%
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3985 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3573 - 3985, n=16)
3776 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3771 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
3764 Points ∼94% -6%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
3564 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Office
  (803 - 4597, n=136)
3211 Points ∼81% -19%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
2429 Points ∼61% -39%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2364 Points ∼59% -41%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
4927 Points ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
4906 Points ∼100% 0%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4832 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4302 - 4927, n=14)
4728 Points ∼96% -4%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4684 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
4600 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Office
  (1226 - 5428, n=336)
4006 Points ∼81% -19%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
4244 Points ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
3723 Points ∼88% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
3690 Points ∼87% -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3672 Points ∼87% -13%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3652 Points ∼86% -14%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3542 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3150 - 4244, n=15)
3525 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Office
  (1169 - 4770, n=392)
3045 Points ∼72% -28%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4244 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5323 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4927 pontos
Ajuda
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Dell Latitude 7490
Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
Average Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-15%
-15%
18%
-27%
-56%
9%
Write 4K
122.03
105.8
-13%
116.4
-5%
135.5
11%
92.75
-24%
79.41
-35%
129 (121 - 144, n=3)
6%
Read 4K
45.56
40.79
-10%
45.75
0%
43.76
-4%
30.67
-33%
27.37
-40%
55.9 (45.6 - 63.5, n=3)
23%
Write Seq
1497.34
1204
-20%
455.1
-70%
1006
-33%
353.2
-76%
343.9
-77%
1495 (1491 - 1497, n=3)
0%
Read Seq
2385.23
1065
-55%
1818
-24%
1761
-26%
1937
-19%
472.7
-80%
2607 (2385 - 2760, n=3)
9%
Write 4K Q32T1
240.94
219.2
-9%
248.9
3%
659.7
174%
358
49%
206
-15%
279 (238 - 357, n=3)
16%
Read 4K Q32T1
338.03
304.3
-10%
358
6%
432.6
28%
253.1
-25%
188.3
-44%
385 (336 - 482, n=3)
14%
Write Seq Q32T1
1528.4
1267
-17%
1191
-22%
1231
-19%
359.6
-76%
343.3
-78%
1533 (1512 - 1558, n=3)
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
2915
3303
13%
2755
-5%
3220
10%
2613
-10%
532.6
-82%
3030 (2915 - 3154, n=3)
4%
AS SSD
-12%
-80%
-13%
-128%
-81%
3%
Copy Game MB/s
548.82
309.25
917 (687 - 1147, n=2)
Copy Program MB/s
210.91
168.2
427 (418 - 437, n=2)
Copy ISO MB/s
732.8
319.17
1507 (1290 - 1725, n=2)
Score Total
2831
3048
8%
1443
-49%
2833
0%
1232
-56%
947
-67%
2879 (2712 - 3095, n=3)
2%
Score Write
1226
921
-25%
405
-67%
741
-40%
376
-69%
357
-71%
1158 (920 - 1328, n=3)
-6%
Score Read
1092
1435
31%
718
-34%
1405
29%
603
-45%
391
-64%
1168 (1092 - 1213, n=3)
7%
Access Time Write *
0.039
0.038
3%
0.144
-269%
0.025
36%
0.053
-36%
0.056
-44%
0.028 (0.021 - 0.039, n=3)
28%
Access Time Read *
0.033
0.055
-67%
0.108
-227%
0.052
-58%
0.321
-873%
0.112
-239%
0.035 (0.033 - 0.037, n=3)
-6%
4K-64 Write
927.31
706.33
-24%
195.84
-79%
515.79
-44%
248.31
-73%
248.06
-73%
854 (594 - 1041, n=3)
-8%
4K-64 Read
760.86
1183.23
56%
446.09
-41%
1202.89
58%
413.33
-46%
316.06
-58%
833 (761 - 873, n=3)
9%
4K Write
164.45
97.85
-40%
87.56
-47%
144.29
-12%
93.56
-43%
79.15
-52%
160 (140 - 175, n=3)
-3%
4K Read
65.58
42.09
-36%
35.67
-46%
45.42
-31%
29.01
-56%
26.66
-59%
65.3 (63.8 - 66.3, n=3)
0%
Seq Write
1341
1172.23
-13%
1219.53
-9%
804.5
-40%
338.97
-75%
294.93
-78%
1438 (1341 - 1511, n=3)
7%
Seq Read
2654
2093.95
-21%
2364.51
-11%
1569.48
-41%
1610.71
-39%
486.16
-82%
2695 (2654 - 2742, n=3)
2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-14% / -13%
-48% / -52%
3% / -0%
-78% / -86%
-69% / -70%
6% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
Sequential Read: 2635.9 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1492 MB/s
512K Read: 1501.2 MB/s
512K Write: 1018.78 MB/s
4K Read: 59.88 MB/s
4K Write: 125.75 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 343.21 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 249.63 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
3756 Points ∼100% +104%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3551 Points ∼95% +93%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1868 Points ∼50% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1839 Points ∼49%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1704 Points ∼45% -7%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 1979, n=150)
1703 Points ∼45% -7%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1653 Points ∼44% -10%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1648 Points ∼44% -10%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1593 Points ∼42% -13%
Average of class Office
  (185 - 5332, n=639)
1284 Points ∼34% -30%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
742 Points ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (76 - 1158, n=44)
473 Points ∼64%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (299 - 402, n=24)
348 Points ∼47%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
322 Points ∼43%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
317 Points ∼43%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
2807 Points ∼100% +110%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
2429 Points ∼87% +82%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1336 Points ∼48%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1283 Points ∼46% -4%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1399, n=119)
1115 Points ∼40% -17%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1009 Points ∼36% -24%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1001 Points ∼36% -25%
Average of class Office
  (138 - 4109, n=461)
995 Points ∼35% -26%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
994 Points ∼35% -26%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
17743 Points ∼100% +63%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
16111 Points ∼91% +48%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
10881 Points ∼61%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
10234 Points ∼58% -6%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11294, n=136)
9091 Points ∼51% -16%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
8181 Points ∼46% -25%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
8138 Points ∼46% -25%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
7943 Points ∼45% -27%
Average of class Office
  (1208 - 27117, n=508)
6900 Points ∼39% -37%
3DMark 11 Performance
2079 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
10155 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1217 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 58.735.330.510.3fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 17fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 8653.32219.5fps
Rocket League (2017) 90.537.524.7fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 31.119.317.4fps

Barulho

Ocioso
29.4 / 29.4 / 30.9 dB
Carga
33.3 / 33.3 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29.4 dB(A)
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
Noise
-2%
1%
-1%
-2%
1%
off / environment *
29.4
28.1
4%
30.25
-3%
29.3
-0%
28.8
2%
28.2
4%
Idle Minimum *
29.4
28.1
4%
30.25
-3%
29.3
-0%
28.8
2%
28.2
4%
Idle Average *
29.4
28.1
4%
30.25
-3%
29.3
-0%
28.8
2%
28.2
4%
Idle Maximum *
30.9
28.1
9%
30.25
2%
29.9
3%
33.1
-7%
28.7
7%
Load Average *
33.3
35.5
-7%
31.3
6%
32.5
2%
35.2
-6%
29.9
10%
Load Maximum *
33.3
41.5
-25%
31.3
6%
36.6
-10%
35.2
-6%
40.2
-21%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 31.8 °C42.9 °C42.4 °C 
 31.6 °C43.3 °C42.1 °C 
 24.6 °C27.4 °C27.8 °C 
Máximo: 43.3 °C
Médio: 34.9 °C
41.2 °C45.1 °C34.6 °C
38.1 °C41.2 °C30.8 °C
27.4 °C28 °C26.5 °C
Máximo: 45.1 °C
Médio: 34.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  32.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 19.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.3 °C / 0.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.331.72524.629.73128.330.54027.526.75025.125.56325.226.18023.125.410022.926.212521.726.116022.130.62002237.625021.340.63152146.640020.650.850020.255.363019.457.580018.961.5100018.360.1125017.959.3160017.160.1200016.760.6250016.261.2315016.158.6400015.850.1500015.652.3630015.453.7800015.5541000015.453.71250015.244.11600014.839.8SPL29.470.2N1.225.3median 17.9median 53.7Delta2.59.330.131.329.430.330.229.929.331.431.632.5262725.526.626.729.525.529.624.438.622.848.922.351.719.656.918.563.717.665.717.167.216.266.616.371.115.973.715.472.715.572.415.572.715.872.516.175.616.67916.877.417.271.317.471.817.467.217.35628.885.81.264.1median 17.2median 67.21.89.536.241.636.234.73734.734.633.634.634.434.234.433.233.533.23234.13232.233.932.240.130.440.144.229.244.247.729.447.749.427.649.454.227.454.256.226.856.256.725.856.757.425.757.459.925.159.964.824.564.868.324.468.362.724.262.767246766.923.966.968.924.168.964.42464.458.623.858.665.223.665.263.823.563.866.223.566.265.323.465.357.723.457.762.223.562.277.336.377.340.52.740.5median 62.2median 24.2median 62.25.81.45.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EADell Latitude 7490
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell Latitude 7490 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.31 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.27 / 0.58 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.62 / 5.16 / 8.7 Watt
Carga midlight 40 / 64 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TFT-LCD, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Dell Latitude 7490
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
5%
-8%
1%
-11%
22%
-9%
-67%
Idle Minimum *
2.62
3.1
-18%
4.7
-79%
3.33
-27%
3.2
-22%
2
24%
3.87 (1 - 12.4, n=158)
-48%
7.63 (2.34 - 32, n=953)
-191%
Idle Average *
5.16
6.4
-24%
7.3
-41%
6.9
-34%
6.6
-28%
4.7
9%
7.12 (4.3 - 15.5, n=158)
-38%
11.4 (4.2 - 42, n=953)
-121%
Idle Maximum *
8.7
9.4
-8%
9.4
-8%
8.2
6%
9.5
-9%
5.7
34%
8.99 (5.2 - 16.6, n=158)
-3%
13.9 (5 - 67, n=953)
-60%
Load Average *
40
29.8
25%
28
30%
29.4
26%
36.2
9%
38.4
4%
35.3 (12.9 - 51.6, n=158)
12%
37.2 (7.43 - 99.3, n=938)
7%
Load Maximum *
64
31.2
51%
28.2
56%
43.4
32%
65.6
-3%
38.9
39%
43.5 (22 - 79, n=158)
32%
45.8 (12.2 - 129, n=940)
28%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 54min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 39min
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Dell Latitude 7490
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
-11%
-2%
-27%
-7%
-10%
-26%
Reader / Idle
1468
937
1138
569 (101 - 1857, n=793)
H.264
834
657
-21%
397
-52%
399
-52%
424 (139 - 834, n=172)
-49%
WiFi v1.3
607
541
-11%
621
2%
390
-36%
447
-26%
548
-10%
410 (105 - 964, n=332)
-32%
Load
99
111
12%
106
7%
156
58%
101 (37 - 259, n=742)
2%

Pro

+ Chassi firme e de alta qualidade
+ Muito boa tela de 1080p (mate, brilhante, gama sRGB quase plena)
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Excelente teclado
+ Operação silenciosa
+ Muito bom desempenho do sistema
+ WWAN pronto
+ 3 anos de garantia

Contra

- Piores opções de manutenção (RAM, Wi-Fi, teclado)
- Resfriamento pior, comparado com o T480s
- Sem GPU dedicada
- Pior desempenho da CPU em comparação com seu predecessor
- Tempos de resposta lentos do painel
- Apenas leitor de cartões microSD com posição desconfortável
- O ventilador reage rapidamente ao uso intenso, especialmente quando conectado na tomada
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad T490s. Test model courtesy of
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad T490s. Test model courtesy of

Podemos mantê-lo breve desta vez: O ThinkPad T490s é um portátil de negócios muito bom e um dos melhores pacotes agora com o novo monitor. O SKU Campus por apenas 1.259 Euros também é uma verdadeira barganha.

Poderíamos terminar nosso veredicto neste momento, mas a situação é um pouco mais complexa quando você compara o ThinkPad T490s com seu antecessor e outros portáteis de 14 polegadas da Lenovo. Uma olhada no portfólio atual de dispositivos de negócios de alta qualidade mostra que todas as séries são mais semelhantes do que nunca. Isso inclui a T490, a T490s, a X1 Carbon, bem como a nova X390, que inclusive compartilha a placa-mãe com a T490s. Obviamente, existem algumas diferenças, mas os clientes obtêm praticamente quatro sistemas quase idênticos quando você examina SKUs equipados de maneira semelhante, e nem sequer incluímos os concorrentes de outros fabricantes.

No passado, o modelo T4x0s era geralmente uma versão mais fina do T4x0 regular, que muitas vezes era equipado com componentes melhores e não ficava para trás em termos de desempenho. Isto muda com o novo T490s. Sim, o novo chassis é um sucesso e a qualidade também está um passo acima do T490 normal, mas o T490 fica para trás no departamento de desempenho. Isso obviamente inclui o adaptador gráfico, porque não há mais dGPU, mas também o desempenho do processador. Este último sofre com a solução de resfriamento menos potente e até mesmo o antecessor era um pouco mais rápido.

O ThinkPad T490s parece ser mais como um X1 Carbon barato (ou X1 Carbon Lite) em nossa opinião. É um pouco maior e mais pesado, mas oferece desempenho semelhante, bem como o design de teclado idêntico. A propósito, a qualidade do teclado está no nível do mais caro X1 Carbon e subjetivamente um passo acima do T490 e a concorrência da Dell, Fujitsu ou HP. A situação das portas dos T490s também nos lembra à do X1 Carbon, incluindo a localização inacessível do leitor de microSD.

Apreciamos as opções de tela adicionais, e a tela mate de 1080p de baixa potência analisada deixa uma ótima impressão, exceto pelos tempos de resposta lentos. Esperamos que seja a opção de tela mais popular tanto para o T490s quanto para o T490 comum. O brilho é muito bom, a qualidade da imagem se beneficia da alta taxa de contraste e o conteúdo não é granulado, apesar da superfície mate. O painel também cobre a gama sRGB menor e os desvios de cor são muito baixos, especialmente após a calibração. Isso significa que a tela também pode lidar com um pouco de edição de imagem - os T490s podem até ser uma opção interessante para os fotógrafos se tivessem um leitor SD de tamanho completo.

Chassi mais fino, melhor tela, melhor teclado, maior duração de bateria - menor desempenho da CPU, sem GPU dedicada, comprometimento das portas e opções de manutenção muito mais limitadas. Dependendo de suas expectativas, o novo T490s será ótimo ou uma grande decepção.

O T490s é atualmente melhor do que os rivais, porque é apenas um pacote muito completo no segmento de portáteis de escritório/negócios. Existem algumas desvantagens, mas algumas delas estão relacionadas ao modelo anterior e os concorrentes também não são perfeitos. Por isso, outorgamos ao T490s nosso Prêmio de Escolha dos Editores. A competição atualizará suas linhas nas próximas semanas, portanto a classificação pode mudar em breve. A Lenovo provavelmente oferecerá concorrentes sérios com os futuros concorrentes da AMD.

Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 - 05/15/2019 v6
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento
91 / 98 → 93%
Teclado
95%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
74 / 80 → 93%
Peso
72 / 20-67 → 100%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
91%
Desempenho do jogos
60 / 68 → 88%
Desempenho da aplicação
89 / 92 → 97%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
91%
Audio
68%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Médio
81%
92%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad T490s (i5, Low Power FHD)
Andreas Osthoff, 2019-05-20 (Update: 2019-05-21)