Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Medion Erazer X6805 (Core i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD)

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Tanja Hinum-Balaz (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/10/2019

Great value for money Enquanto os portáteis para jogos estão se tornando mais caros e muitos fabricantes estão superando uns aos outros com novos preços máximos, a Medion continua a oferecer portáteis com bons preços. Leia mais para descobrir como o Erazer X6805 se desempenha contra outros portáteis de jogos baratos.

Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Análises do: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 388.73, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, 2 x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual channel, todos os slots ocupados, até 32 GB
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, Full-HD, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, NVMe SSD + Seagate Barracuda ST1000LM048, 1 TB HDD, 5400 RPM. 2 x M.2 2280 & 1 x 2.5-inch drive bayNVMe SSD + Seagate Barracuda ST1000LM048, 1 TB HDD, 5400 RPM. 2 x M.2 2280 & 1 x 2.5-inch drive bay
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 x conector para fones, 1 x conector para microfone, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 33 x 385 x 265
Bateria
46.7 Wh, 4100 mAh Lítio-Ion, 3 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.1 (Dolby Atmos), Teclado: meânico, RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 180 W, folheto de garantia, instruções de segurança, Control Center, CyberLink PowerRecover, McAfee Security Trial, Life App Explorer, Steam, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.548 kg, Suprimento de energia: 416 g
Preço
1400 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

385 mm 265 mm 33 mm 2.5 kg390 mm 266 mm 27 mm 2.3 kg389 mm 274.7 mm 24.95 mm 2.6 kg360 mm 268 mm 28 mm 2.3 kg364 mm 265 mm 23 mm 2.7 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg
Left-hand side: RJ45-LAN, USB Type-A 2.0, Microphone jack, Headphone jack
Left-hand side: RJ45-LAN, USB Type-A 2.0, Microphone jack, Headphone jack
Right-hand side: 2x USB Type-A 3.0, card reader
Right-hand side: 2x USB Type-A 3.0, card reader
Rear: Kensington Lock, 2 x Mini DisplayPort, HDMI, USB Type-C 3.0, Power connector
Rear: Kensington Lock, 2 x Mini DisplayPort, HDMI, USB Type-C 3.0, Power connector
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=224)
91.1 MB/s ∼100% +379%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼88% +321%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼86% +311%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s ∼30% +42%
Dell G7 15-7588
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
22.53 MB/s ∼25% +19%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
19 MB/s ∼21%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=222)
110 MB/s ∼100% +233%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼79% +164%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼78% +161%
Dell G7 15-7588
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
34.51 MB/s ∼31% +5%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33 MB/s ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28 MB/s ∼25% -15%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
690 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
674 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
674 MBit/s ∼98%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
663 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
660 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
659 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=223)
599 MBit/s ∼87% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
660 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
643 MBit/s ∼97% 0%
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
642 MBit/s ∼97% 0%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
642 MBit/s ∼97%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
632 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 721, n=223)
547 MBit/s ∼83% -15%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
363 MBit/s ∼55% -43%
246
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
269
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 287 cd/m² Médio: 269.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 270 cd/m²
Contraste: 844:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 3.25
ΔE Greyscale 4.16 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
82% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.53
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE0747), IPS, 1920x1080
Dell G7 15-7588
LG Philips LGD053F, IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK6 (LGD0590), IPS, 1920x1080
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
BOE07A1, IPS, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
B156HAN02.1, IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
-25%
4%
13%
-44%
-13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38.4 (18.8, 19.6)
53.2 (26.4, 26.8)
-39%
38.8 (16, 22.8)
-1%
38 (19.2, 18.8)
1%
47.2 (23.6, 23.6)
-23%
43.6 (19.2, 24.4)
-14%
Response Time Black / White *
29.2 (16.8, 12.4)
41.6 (23.6, 18)
-42%
26.8 (14.4, 12.4)
8%
22 (12, 10)
25%
32.4 (18, 14.4)
-11%
32.4 (18, 14.4)
-11%
PWM Frequency
20490 (99)
21550 (99)
5%
200 (99)
-99%
Screen
12%
-41%
4%
-1%
-19%
Brightness middle
270
283
5%
250.9
-7%
252
-7%
275
2%
282.8
5%
Brightness
269
269
0%
246
-9%
237
-12%
254
-6%
264
-2%
Brightness Distribution
86
87
1%
89
3%
86
0%
90
5%
88
2%
Black Level *
0.32
0.23
28%
0.34
-6%
0.21
34%
0.27
16%
0.42
-31%
Contrast
844
1230
46%
738
-13%
1200
42%
1019
21%
673
-20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.1
4.68
8%
7.34
-44%
4.42
13%
4.62
9%
4.93
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.25
8
14%
28.66
-210%
7.21
22%
8.05
13%
17.65
-91%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.25
2.5
23%
4.42
-36%
3.08
5%
3.59
-10%
4.07
-25%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.16
4.32
-4%
6.8
-63%
3.74
10%
4.31
-4%
3.8
9%
Gamma
2.53 87%
2.36 93%
2.164 102%
2.34 94%
2.49 88%
2.449 90%
CCT
6860 95%
7612 85%
6780 96%
7291 89%
7000 93%
6112 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
54
57
6%
36
-33%
38
-30%
38
-30%
36
-33%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
82
87
6%
56
-32%
59
-28%
59
-28%
57
-30%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-7% / 4%
-19% / -34%
9% / 6%
-23% / -10%
-16% / -18%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.8 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (40.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 20490 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 20490 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 20490 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9554 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
Software
LatencyMon
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Core i7-8750H
177 Points ∼100% +4%
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points ∼99% +3%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points ∼98% +1%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Core i5-8300H
171 Points ∼97% 0%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
Intel Core i7-8750H
171 Points ∼97%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=466)
154 Points ∼87% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
138 Points ∼78% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
Intel Core i7-8750H
1196 Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Core i7-8750H
1090 Points ∼91% -9%
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Core i7-8750H
1079 Points ∼90% -10%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Core i5-8300H
818 Points ∼68% -32%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
805 Points ∼67% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1979, n=469)
791 Points ∼66% -34%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
516 Points ∼43% -57%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points ∼100% +2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points ∼100% +2%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.95 Points ∼98%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.94 Points ∼97% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=416)
1.685 Points ∼85% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.56 Points ∼78% -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
Intel Core i7-8750H
13.24 Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.98 Points ∼98% -2%
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.08 Points ∼91% -9%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
8.68 Points ∼66% -34%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.4, n=517)
7.37 Points ∼56% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.93 Points ∼45% -55%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.95 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
13.24 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
171 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1196 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
5285 Points ∼100% +1%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5234 Points ∼99%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=161)
5103 Points ∼97% -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
5001 Points ∼95% -4%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4812 Points ∼91% -8%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
4707 Points ∼89% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
4197 Points ∼79% -20%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
5410 Points ∼100% +1%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5379 Points ∼99%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
5370 Points ∼99% 0%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
5369 Points ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
5362 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=350)
4988 Points ∼92% -7%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
4912 Points ∼91% -9%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4404 Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
4371 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=368)
4246 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4129 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
4109 Points ∼93% -7%
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
3968 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
3910 Points ∼89% -11%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4404 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5379 pontos
Ajuda
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
Dell G7 15-7588
SK hynix SC311 SATA
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
AS SSD
-51%
-69%
-32%
-56%
-60%
Score Total
3113
834
-73%
528
-83%
1643
-47%
670
-78%
838
-73%
Score Write
762
302
-60%
181
-76%
661
-13%
195
-74%
128
-83%
Score Read
1565
343
-78%
233
-85%
670
-57%
343
-78%
497
-68%
4K Write
100.94
104.05
3%
59.82
-41%
94.53
-6%
79.31
-21%
35.74
-65%
4K Read
44.29
38.11
-14%
23.66
-47%
32.38
-27%
31.48
-29%
38.71
-13%
Seq Write
1262.47
450.12
-64%
220.29
-83%
554.03
-56%
123.53
-90%
131.64
-90%
Seq Read
1652.94
501.5
-70%
505.64
-69%
1320.51
-20%
1237.74
-25%
1230.64
-26%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3389 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1265 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 352.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 302.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 777.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1095 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 38.98 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 90.33 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11903 Points ∼100% +2%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11662 Points ∼98%
Dell G7 15-7588
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
11309 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=492)
10922 Points ∼92% -6%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
7740 Points ∼65% -34%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
7682 Points ∼65% -34%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
7576 Points ∼64% -35%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15322 Points ∼100% +5%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14557 Points ∼95%
Dell G7 15-7588
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
14487 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=567)
12759 Points ∼83% -12%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
9909 Points ∼65% -32%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
9266 Points ∼60% -36%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
9203 Points ∼60% -37%
3DMark 11 Performance
13648 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
33333 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10351 pontos
Ajuda
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=266)
47.8 fps ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
40.3 fps ∼84% +2%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
39.5 fps ∼83%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
37 fps ∼77% -6%
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
37 fps ∼77% -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
26 fps ∼54% -34%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
24.2 fps ∼51% -39%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 194, n=225)
82 fps ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
72.8 fps ∼89% +1%
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
72.1 fps ∼88%
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
62 fps ∼76% -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
46.4 fps ∼57% -36%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
44.2 fps ∼54% -39%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 72.139.5fps
Destiny 2 (2017) 93.881.3fps
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) 85.278.7fps
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 94.568.2fps
The Crew 2 (2018) 6059.9fps
Monster Hunter World (2018) 56.544.9fps
F1 2018 (2018) 9760fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 5649fps

Barulho

Ocioso
29 / 32 / 35 dB
HDD
32 dB
Carga
45 / 56 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-3%
6%
3%
-1%
12%
2%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
28.1
3%
30
-3%
29
-0%
28
3%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=270)
-1%
Idle Minimum *
29
30
-3%
29
-0%
30
-3%
29
-0%
28
3%
31.5 (28 - 41.7, n=693)
-9%
Idle Average *
32
34
-6%
29
9%
32
-0%
33
-3%
28
12%
32.8 (28 - 46.6, n=693)
-3%
Idle Maximum *
35
38
-9%
29.2
17%
33
6%
41
-17%
28.5
19%
34.7 (28 - 51, n=693)
1%
Load Average *
45
44
2%
40.6
10%
42
7%
44
2%
34.9
22%
40.6 (30.3 - 58, n=694)
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
47
50
-6%
49.8
-6%
46
2%
47
-0%
40
15%
Load Maximum *
56
55
2%
49.8
11%
49
12%
49
12%
49.6
11%
47.9 (38.9 - 64.1, n=694)
14%

* ... smaller is better

 40 °C43 °C35 °C 
 36 °C42 °C32 °C 
 26 °C28 °C28 °C 
Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 34.4 °C
43 °C46 °C47 °C
48 °C55 °C38 °C
28 °C29 °C25 °C
Máximo: 55 °C
Médio: 39.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  53 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 41.9 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-3.3 °C / -5.9 F).
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-6%
5%
-14%
-17%
-10%
-3%
Maximum Upper Side *
43
46
-7%
48.6
-13%
52
-21%
51
-19%
42.8
-0%
45.7 (28 - 68.8, n=658)
-6%
Maximum Bottom *
55
52
5%
51.4
7%
55
-0%
58
-5%
52
5%
49.3 (25.9 - 78, n=656)
10%
Idle Upper Side *
28
32
-14%
24
14%
36
-29%
35
-25%
32
-14%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=609)
-10%
Idle Bottom *
30
32
-7%
26.8
11%
32
-7%
35
-17%
39.4
-31%
31.6 (21.1 - 50.3, n=607)
-5%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.243.92535.139.73129.130.9403637.4502928.56326.427.88025.638.610025.541.312523.340.916022.35320022.560.725021.165.131519.865.740018.966.750018.569.363017.575.180017.175.4100017.570125017.665.6160017.473.2200016.868.9250017.464.7315017.369.7400017.167.6500017.367.8630017.364.1800017.258.21000017.363.31250017.167.31600017.258.7SPL29.781.7N1.354.2median 17.4median 65.7Delta1.84.938.540.733.834.127.629.633.736.725.932.32536.72543.42947.526.150.62358.223.161.920.968.120.271.718.675.318.17817.980.619.478.720.177.61877.71773.917.579.817.177.617.474.717.372.317.271.91773.116.970.616.965.316.963.616.857.73088.21.479.2median 17.9median 72.31.97.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMedion Erazer X6805-MD61085Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.7 / 2.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 10 / 13 / 21 Watt
Carga midlight 101 / 176 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
13%
29%
33%
6%
27%
-47%
Idle Minimum *
10
10
-0%
5.5
45%
5
50%
12
-20%
4.5
55%
19.8 (3.5 - 113, n=653)
-98%
Idle Average *
13
13
-0%
7.6
42%
7
46%
14
-8%
10
23%
25.3 (6.8 - 119, n=653)
-95%
Idle Maximum *
21
19
10%
9
57%
11
48%
18
14%
13.8
34%
30.4 (8.3 - 122, n=653)
-45%
Load Average *
101
68
33%
94
7%
91
10%
92
9%
92.5
8%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=644)
-3%
Load Maximum *
176
136
23%
154.4
12%
137
22%
142
19%
123.2
30%
169 (21.9 - 590, n=643)
4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
126
110
13%
116.3
8%
97
23%
100
21%
108.1
14%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
8h 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 30min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 38min
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, 46.7 Wh
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, 55 Wh
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, 56 Wh
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H, 48 Wh
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, 70 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, 52.5 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-13%
44%
32%
41%
-9%
-19%
Reader / Idle
503
386
-23%
656
30%
752
50%
626
24%
339 (39 - 1174, n=629)
-33%
WiFi v1.3
270
275
2%
452
67%
418
55%
514
90%
245
-9%
254 (78 - 622, n=314)
-6%
Load
98
80
-18%
132
35%
90
-8%
106
8%
78.9 (18 - 202, n=595)
-19%
H.264
265
428
506
248 (88 - 506, n=135)

Pro

+ Carcaça com aparência premium
+ Robusto
+ O pousa palmas sempre permanece frio
+ Decente valor pelo dinheiro
+ Teclado mecânico
+ Bom alto-falantes
+ Iluminação RGB
+ Wi-Fi rápido
+ SSD NVMe

Contra

- Sem Thunderbolt 3 ou USB 3.1 Gen2
- A carcaça é um imã para as digitais
- A bateria poderia ser maior
- Controle limitado da ventoniha
- Desmontagem complicada
- Lento leitor de cartões SD
The Medion Erazer X6805 laptop review. Test devices courtesy of Medion Germany.
The Medion Erazer X6805 laptop review. Test devices courtesy of Medion Germany.

O Medion Erazer X6805 é um excelente valor pelo dinheiro. A maioria dos portáteis de jogos econômicos é equipado com uma CPU Core i5-8300H, uma GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, 8 GB de RAM e um SSD de 128 GB. A Medion deu um passo para frente e armou seu X6805 com uma CPU Core i7-8750H, uma GPU GeForce GTX 1060, 16 GB de RAM e um SSD PCIe de 256 GB.

A inclusão de um teclado mecânico é um movimento incomum, mas inteligente, para um dispositivo desse preço. Além disso, a iluminação RGB e a carcaça robusta devem atrair os jogadores. Os alto-falantes e a seleção de portas também são decentes, embora tenhamos gostado de ver o Thunderbolt 3 ou pelo menos uma porta USB 3.1 Gen2.

O Medion Erazer X6805 é um poderoso e bem projetado portátil de jogos de orçamento que não é obstaculizado por suas deficiências.

A Medion também poderia ter equipado o X6805 com um leitor de cartões SD mais rápido e ajustou a curva padrão do ventilador. Além disso, o dispositivo teria se beneficiado de uma opção para uma bateria maior em vez do HD. Independentemente disso, recomendamos muito o Medion Erazer X6805, pois é um dos melhores portáteis de jogos de orçamento no momento.

Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 - 09/28/2018 v6
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
80 / 98 → 82%
Teclado
89%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
61 / 81 → 75%
Peso
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Bateria
78%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
94%
Desempenho da aplicação
96%
Temperatura
84 / 95 → 89%
Ruído
65 / 90 → 72%
Audio
78%
Médio
79%
85%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Medion Erazer X6805
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Medion Erazer X6805 (Core i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD)
Florian Glaser, 2019-01-10 (Update: 2019-01-11)