Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 15 (i5-8300H, GTX 1050 Ti, FHD)

Preço-desempenho atraente. A série HP Omen de portáteis para jogos acessíveis está no mercado há muitos anos. Demos uma olhada mais de perto no atual portátil para jogos Coffee Lake de 15 polegadas - será que é bom o suficiente para entrar na nossa lista dos top 10 para portáteis de jogos?
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng (Omen 15-dc Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-8300H 4 x 2.3 - 4 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1493 MHz, Memoría: 7000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 389.12, Optimus
Memória
8 GB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, single channel, 1 of 2 slots used, max. 32 GB
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE07A1, IPS, FHD, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G, 128 GB 
, PCIe-SSD + Seagate BarraCuda Pro ST1000LM049, 1 TB HDD, 7200 rpm. slots: 1x M.2-2280 & 1x 2.5 inch
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1x headphones, 1x microphone, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 25 x 360 x 263
Bateria
70 Wh Lítio-Ion, 4-cell
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0 Bang & Olufsen, Teclado: Chiclet, RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 150 W power supply, quick-start guide, various HP tools, McAfee LifeSafe trial, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.42 kg, Suprimento de energia: 343 g
Preço
1000 EUR
Links
HP página inicial
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
389 mm 276 mm 25 mm 2.6 kg389 mm 274.7 mm 24.95 mm 2.9 kg380 mm 265 mm 28.8 mm 2.6 kg384 mm 262 mm 23 mm 2.2 kg381.6 mm 262.8 mm 23.95 mm 2.4 kg364 mm 265 mm 23 mm 2.7 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77 MB/s -1%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
73.5 MB/s -6%
Medion Erazer X6603
  (oshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72 MB/s -8%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
 
70.7 MB/s -9%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s -65%
Dell G5 15 5587
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
20 MB/s -74%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus GL503VD-DB74
 
87.4 MB/s 0%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s 0%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84.4 MB/s -3%
Medion Erazer X6603
  (oshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.2 MB/s -10%
Dell G5 15 5587
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
35 MB/s -60%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28 MB/s -68%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
664 MBit/s +3%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
643 MBit/s
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
582 MBit/s -9%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
512 MBit/s -20%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
426 MBit/s -34%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
420 MBit/s -35%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
363 MBit/s -44%
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
701 MBit/s +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
690 MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
659 MBit/s -4%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
637 MBit/s -8%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
635 MBit/s -8%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
517 MBit/s -25%
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
485 MBit/s -30%
253
cd/m²		248
cd/m²		247
cd/m²
257
cd/m²		275
cd/m²		250
cd/m²
249
cd/m²		260
cd/m²		247
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE07A1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 275 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 254 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 275 cd/m²
Contraste: 1019:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.62 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 3.59
ΔE Greyscale 4.31 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.95% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.64% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
BOE07A1, IPS, 1920x1080		HP Omen 15-ce002ng
AUO42ED, IPS, 1920x1080		Dell G5 15 5587
LGD053F, 156WF6, IPS, 1920x1080		Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE0747), IPS, 1920x1080		Medion Erazer X6603
LP156WF6-SPK3, AH-IPS, LED, 1920x1080		Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
BOE NV156FHM-N42 , a-Si TFT-LCD, IPS, 1920x1080		Asus GL503VD-DB74
LG Philips LP156WF6, IPS, 1920x1080
Display
61%
-4%
57%
-7%
2%
52%
Display P3 Coverage
39.64
65.8
66%
38.13
-4%
66.6
68%
36.82
-7%
40.53
2%
64.3
62%
sRGB Coverage
59
90.9
54%
56.8
-4%
87.3
48%
54.9
-7%
59.9
2%
84.4
43%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
40.95
66.5
62%
39.47
-4%
63.8
56%
38.09
-7%
41.87
2%
61.7
51%
Response Times
6%
28%
3545%
333%
3295%
3482%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47.2 ?(23.6, 23.6)
43.2 ?(21.2, 22)
8%
33 ?(16, 17)
30%
53.2 ?(26.4, 26.8)
-13%
46 ?(36, 10)
3%
49 ?(25, 24)
-4%
36.4 ?(16.4, 20)
23%
Response Time Black / White *
32.4 ?(18, 14.4)
31.2 ?(16.4, 14.8)
4%
24 ?(14, 10)
26%
41.6 ?(23.6, 18)
-28%
29 ?(17, 12)
10%
36 ?(20, 16)
-11%
26.2 ?(14, 12.4)
19%
PWM Frequency
200 ?(99)
21550 ?(99)
10675%
2174 ?(90)
987%
20000 ?(90)
9900%
21010 ?(99)
10405%
Screen
22%
-23%
15%
-23%
-1%
5%
Brightness middle
275
304
11%
229
-17%
283
3%
252
-8%
267
-3%
315.9
15%
Brightness
254
289
14%
224
-12%
269
6%
246
-3%
250
-2%
304
20%
Brightness Distribution
90
86
-4%
87
-3%
87
-3%
94
4%
82
-9%
88
-2%
Black Level *
0.27
0.26
4%
0.28
-4%
0.23
15%
0.23
15%
0.31
-15%
0.37
-37%
Contrast
1019
1169
15%
818
-20%
1230
21%
1096
8%
861
-16%
854
-16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.62
3.46
25%
6.1
-32%
4.68
-1%
7.83
-69%
4.65
-1%
4.9
-6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.05
7.72
4%
12.2
-52%
8
1%
15.5
-93%
8.2
-2%
9.7
-20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.59
6.12
-70%
2.5
30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.31
2.46
43%
5.68
-32%
4.32
-0%
7.11
-65%
2.65
39%
3.8
12%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.38 92%
2.4 92%
2.36 93%
2.19 100%
2.44 90%
2.24 98%
CCT
7000 93%
6915 94%
6989 93%
7612 85%
7930 82%
6820 95%
6847 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38
59
55%
36
-5%
57
50%
35
-8%
38
0%
55
45%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59
91
54%
57
-3%
87
47%
55
-7%
59
0%
84
42%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
30% / 28%
0% / -13%
1206% / 646%
101% / 47%
1099% / 618%
1180% / 666%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 14.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.6 ms rise
↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
LatencyMon
Software
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.68 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.94 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
805 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
173 Points
Ajuda
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Core i5-8300H
172 Points -1%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points -8%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points -13%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
147 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
138 Points -20%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
133 Points -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
805 Points
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
740 Points -8%
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Core i5-8300H
735 Points -9%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points -9%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
516 Points -36%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
513 Points -36%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.94 Points 0%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.94 Points
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points -6%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points -7%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.72 Points -11%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.68 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.56 Points -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
8.68 Points
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.18 Points -6%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.17 Points -6%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.13 Points -6%
Dell G5 15 5587
Intel Core i5-8300H
7.84 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.93 Points -32%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.91 Points -32%
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 M.2
5483 Points +16%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4861 Points +3%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
4707 Points
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4618 Points -2%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, ADATA SX7000NP 256 GB
4250 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
4197 Points -11%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
4092 Points -13%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4858 Points +18%
Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 M.2
4331 Points +5%
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4119 Points 0%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
4109 Points
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
4055 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
3910 Points -5%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, ADATA SX7000NP 256 GB
3852 Points -6%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
5362 Points
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5348 Points 0%
Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 M.2
5339 Points 0%
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5129 Points -4%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, ADATA SX7000NP 256 GB
4973 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
4912 Points -8%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
4908 Points -8%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4109 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5362 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
4707 pontos
Ajuda
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G		Dell G5 15 5587
SK hynix SC311 M.2		Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ		Medion Erazer X6603
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH		Asus GL503VD-DB74
ADATA SX7000NP 256 GB
AS SSD
-7%
48%
257%
51%
155%
Seq Read
1238
511
-59%
502
-59%
2805
127%
488.4
-61%
1226
-1%
Seq Write
123.5
243.7
97%
450.1
264%
1081
775%
394.2
219%
825
568%
4K Read
31.48
24.44
-22%
38.11
21%
46.58
48%
36.25
15%
31.4
0%
4K Write
79.3
62.2
-22%
104.1
31%
129.3
63%
64.7
-18%
110.7
40%
Score Read
343
240
-30%
343
0%
1162
239%
460
34%
419
22%
Score Write
195
199
2%
302
55%
750
285%
395
103%
851
336%
Score Total
670
557
-17%
834
24%
2431
263%
1099
64%
1476
120%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1096 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 130.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 195.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 104.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 857 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 130.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 29.51 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 77.1 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
8908 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22454 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6653 pontos
Ajuda
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11903 Points +57%
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
10970 Points +45%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
10349 Points +37%
Medion Erazer X6603
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7694 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7576 Points
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
6164 Points -19%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
5952 Points -21%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
15322 Points +65%
Dell G5 15 5587
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
13871 Points +50%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
13279 Points +43%
Medion Erazer X6603
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9518 Points +3%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9266 Points
Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
7917 Points -15%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
7471 Points -19%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ
40.3 fps +67%
Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
34.9 (29min - 39max) fps +44%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
34.6 fps +43%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
24.2 fps
Asus GL503VD-DB74
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
22 fps -9%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ
72.8 fps +65%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
63.2 fps +43%
Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H
58.3 fps +32%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
44.2 fps
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 44.2 24.2
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 88.3 66.6
Overwatch (2016) 117 71
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 47.5 43.3
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 153 114
Destiny 2 (2017) 62.8 51.2

Barulho

Ocioso
29 / 33 / 41 dB
HDD
33 dB
Carga
44 / 49 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H		HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ		Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H		Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ		Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ		Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ		Asus GL503VD-DB74
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Noise
3%
7%
-3%
7%
10%
4%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
30.3
-4%
30
-3%
30.9
-7%
30.4
-5%
28.3
2%
Idle Minimum *
29
30
-3%
31.1
-7%
30
-3%
30.9
-7%
30.4
-5%
30.6
-6%
Idle Average *
33
33
-0%
31.1
6%
34
-3%
30.9
6%
30.8
7%
30.8
7%
Idle Maximum *
41
37
10%
34.2
17%
38
7%
31.6
23%
30.8
25%
32.8
20%
Load Average *
44
41
7%
34.9
21%
44
-0%
38.5
12%
33.6
24%
37.6
15%
Witcher 3 ultra *
47
42
11%
42.7
9%
50
-6%
47
-0%
Load Maximum *
49
50
-2%
44
10%
55
-12%
40.8
17%
43.4
11%
53.5
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 49 °C50 °C48 °C 
 48 °C51 °C48 °C 
 39 °C42 °C40 °C 
Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 46.1 °C
57 °C53 °C58 °C
56 °C55 °C50 °C
36 °C38 °C30 °C
Máximo: 58 °C
Médio: 48.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  54 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H		HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ		Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H		Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ		Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ		Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ		Asus GL503VD-DB74
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Heat
-1%
10%
10%
26%
19%
-2%
Maximum Upper Side *
51
47
8%
50.2
2%
46
10%
44.3
13%
41.6
18%
60.4
-18%
Maximum Bottom *
58
54
7%
57
2%
52
10%
39.5
32%
42.5
27%
55.2
5%
Idle Upper Side *
35
36
-3%
28.6
18%
32
9%
24.8
29%
29.7
15%
32.4
7%
Idle Bottom *
35
40
-14%
28.9
17%
32
9%
24.6
30%
29.4
16%
36
-3%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.541.92532.633.4313030.24029.5355026.427.66324.526.48024.226.410024.231.312523.937.41602137.920021.351.525020.862.331519.567.540018.569.850018.271.963017.775.98001872.8100017.873.112501772160017.174.6200017.471250017.569.2315017.567.9400017.468.5500017.369.1630017.464.3800017.562.51000017.467.31250019.272.91600018.765.9SPL29.883N1.358.2median 17.8median 68.5Delta1.66.83734.931.629.128.726.529.330.827.226.225.32625.32625.436.422.54923.547.522.457.319.963.620.566.218.868.618.266.818.369.617.67117.770.717.171.116.971.617.268.417.365.717.264.717.365.217.462.517.359.617.559.918.166.917.572.717.26829.780.21.349.2median 17.6median 66.21.74.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen 15-dc0001ngHP Omen 15-ce002ng
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Omen 15-ce002ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 1.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 12 / 14 / 18 Watt
Carga midlight 92 / 142 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H		HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ		Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H		Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ		Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ		Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ		Asus GL503VD-DB74
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Power Consumption
-30%
23%
6%
38%
40%
20%
Idle Minimum *
12
18
-50%
4.9
59%
10
17%
4.7
61%
4
67%
8.2
32%
Idle Average *
14
23
-64%
8.5
39%
13
7%
7.6
46%
6.9
51%
11.1
21%
Idle Maximum *
18
30
-67%
9.1
49%
19
-6%
9.2
49%
9.4
48%
11.8
34%
Load Average *
92
85
8%
90.7
1%
68
26%
81
12%
72.6
21%
81
12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
100
96
4%
110
-10%
110
-10%
95.1
5%
Load Maximum *
142
158
-11%
144
-1%
136
4%
112
21%
122
14%
123.3
13%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
10h 26min
WiFi Websurfing
8h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 26min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 46min
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, 70 Wh		HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 70 Wh		Dell G5 15 5587
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H, 56 Wh		Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, 55 Wh		Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 45 Wh		Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, 48 Wh		Asus GL503VD-DB74
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 64 Wh
Battery Runtime
-50%
-6%
-39%
-52%
-23%
-20%
Reader / Idle
626
256
-59%
705
13%
386
-38%
340
-46%
592
-5%
647
3%
H.264
506
224
-56%
325
-36%
265
-48%
227
-55%
306
-40%
WiFi v1.3
514
198
-61%
391
-24%
275
-46%
257
-50%
336
-35%
348
-32%
Load
106
80
-25%
133
25%
80
-25%
46
-57%
94
-11%
73
-31%

Pro

+ great price-performance ratio
+ decent connectivity distribution
+ thin display bezels
+ compact power supply
+ long battery life

Contra

- mediocre display (PWM, response times, brightness, color-space coverage)
- high temperature and noise emissions under load
- poor SSD write performance
- no Thunderbolt 3

Error: More than one (2) Pro / Contra Item for this review found!

HP Omen 15. Review unit courtesy of Cyberport.
HP Omen 15. Review unit courtesy of Cyberport.

O Omen 15 de nível de entrada acabou por ser um dos melhores portáteis de jogos na faixa de preço de menos de $1.000.

Verdade, a combinação do Core i5 2430M, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, e 8 GB de RAM DDR4 pode não estar particularmente preparado para o futuro. No entanto, atualmente o Omen 15 de 15 polegadas pode rodar quase todos os jogos com configurações altas ou máximas e, portanto, é ideal para jogadores com orçamento limitado.

A HP obviamente teve que cortar custos para obter o preço abaixo da faixa dos $1.000, por exemplo, a cobertura de espaço de cor ruim e o baixo brilho da tela, o baixo desempenho de gravação do SSD ou a falta do Thunderbolt 3.

Se você não se importar com essas desvantagens, você terá um portátil para jogos muito bem equilibrado com uma carcaça estilosa, dispositivos de entrada decentes, várias portas e um desempenho de som decente. Os marcos estreitos da tela e a longa duração da bateria foram certamente os dois destaques deste dispositivo.

Dado que os seus concorrentes são mais frios e silenciosos ao mesmo tempo, a HP deve abordar a solução de resfriamento do Omen 15. Especialmente considerando que um modelo Core i7 2670QM será disponibilizado em breve.

HP Omen 15-dc0001ng - 07/26/2018 v6(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
79 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
66 / 81 → 82%
Peso
60 / 10-66 → 90%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
80%
Desempenho do jogos
90%
Desempenho da aplicação
95%
Temperatura
78 / 95 → 82%
Ruído
72 / 90 → 79%
Audio
74%
Médio
79%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 15 (i5-8300H, GTX 1050 Ti, FHD)
Florian Glaser, 2018-08- 2 (Update: 2018-08- 5)