Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus (N3350, QHD)

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/23/2019

It doesn't even have an audio jack. O NuVision parece bom, mas é só isso. Este subportátil super-portátil e super-barato é arrastado para baixo pelo desempenho do processador inferior, teclado esponjoso, um SSD muito lento e a seleção mais limitada de portas que vimos em qualquer portátil.

NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 500, 22.20.16.4749
Memória
4096 MB 
, 1200 MHz, ?-15-15-34, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
12.5 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 235 PPI, Sharp SHP142C, IPS, LQ125T1JX03, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
SanDisk DF4064, 64 GB 
Placa de Som
RealTek ALC269 @ Intel Apollo Lake SoC - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 15 x 292.9 x 192.8
Bateria
31.9 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 1.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, USB Type-C Hub, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
1.04 kg, Suprimento de energia: 167 g
Preço
350 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: USB Type-C Gen. 1
Right: USB Type-C Gen. 1
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: USB Type-C Gen. 1 + AC adapter
Left: USB Type-C Gen. 1 + AC adapter
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 5290
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
611 MBit/s ∼100% +75%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
581 MBit/s ∼95% +66%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Broadcom 802.11ac
570 (min: 566, max: 572) MBit/s ∼93% +63%
Lenovo ThinkPad A275
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
475 MBit/s ∼78% +36%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
350 MBit/s ∼57%
Chuwi LapBook SE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
309 (min: 299, max: 316) MBit/s ∼51% -12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 5290
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
521 MBit/s ∼100% +64%
Lenovo ThinkPad A275
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
519 MBit/s ∼100% +64%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
476 MBit/s ∼91% +50%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Broadcom 802.11ac
461 (min: 216, max: 525) MBit/s ∼88% +45%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
317 MBit/s ∼61%
Chuwi LapBook SE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
301 (min: 237, max: 351) MBit/s ∼58% -5%
418.3
cd/m²
437.1
cd/m²
416.6
cd/m²
410.6
cd/m²
431.5
cd/m²
417.4
cd/m²
349.5
cd/m²
397.9
cd/m²
375.6
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 437.1 cd/m² Médio: 406.1 cd/m² Minimum: 8.82 cd/m²
iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 431.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 1003:1 (Preto: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.56 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 3.34
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
98.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 66.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
Sharp SHP142C, IPS, 12.5, 2560x1440
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Sharp SHP14A6, IPS, 10, 1800x1200
Dell Latitude 5290
AUO B125XW01-V0, TN LED, 12.5, 1366x768
Lenovo ThinkPad A275
Len40E0, TN, 12.5, 1366x768
Chuwi LapBook SE
13.3, 1920x1080
Apple MacBook Air 2018
APPA039, IPS, 13.3, 2560x1600
Response Times
139%
18%
107%
3%
19055%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37.6 (20.4, 17.2)
44 (22, 22)
-17%
46.8 (26.8, 20)
-24%
41 (22, 19)
-9%
39.2 (19.2, 20)
-4%
39.6 (20.8, 18.8)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
31.6 (16.8, 14.8)
25.6 (11.6, 14)
19%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
59%
23 (19, 4)
27%
27.7 (14.8, 12.9)
12%
28 (15.6, 12.4)
11%
PWM Frequency
198.4 (25)
1020 (99)
414%
800 (30)
303%
200 (29)
1%
113600 (75)
57158%
Screen
30%
-101%
-79%
-47%
26%
Brightness middle
431.5
456
6%
232
-46%
255
-41%
227
-47%
320
-26%
Brightness
406
426
5%
218
-46%
244
-40%
210
-48%
315
-22%
Brightness Distribution
80
88
10%
86
8%
87
9%
89
11%
95
19%
Black Level *
0.43
0.31
28%
0.54
-26%
0.52
-21%
0.44
-2%
0.29
33%
Contrast
1003
1471
47%
430
-57%
490
-51%
516
-49%
1103
10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.56
1.3
63%
11.8
-231%
9.76
-174%
6.6
-85%
1.2
66%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7
3
57%
23.2
-231%
14.53
-108%
12.2
-74%
3.2
54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.34
1.1
67%
3.9
-17%
1.9
43%
0.5
85%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.9
1.4
52%
13.9
-379%
11.13
-284%
7.9
-172%
0.8
72%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.24 98%
2.13 103%
2.38 92%
2.16 102%
2.2 100%
CCT
6572 99%
6687 97%
16629 39%
12214 53%
8879 73%
6548 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
66.7
62.3
-7%
37.6
-44%
40
-40%
62.1
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98.9
96.8
-2%
59.2
-40%
63
-36%
96
-3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
85% / 53%
-42% / -83%
14% / -36%
-22% / -35%
9541% / 4103%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.8 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 198.4 Hz ≤ 25 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9226 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230Tooltip
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus HD Graphics 500, N3350, SanDisk DF4064; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø84.2 (83.38-84.84)
Lenovo ThinkPad A275 Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø195 (189.59-225.4)
Chuwi LapBook SE UHD Graphics 600, N4100, SanDisk DF4032; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø158 (150.45-161.13)
Chuwi GBox CWI560 UHD Graphics 600, N4100, SanDisk DA4064; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø186 (184.81-188.15)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 5290
Intel Core i5-8250U
147 Points ∼67% +206%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Intel Core i5-8210Y
132 Points ∼61% +175%
Intel NUC7CJYH
Intel Celeron J4005
77 Points ∼35% +60%
Lenovo ThinkPad A275
AMD PRO A12-9800B
75 Points ∼34% +56%
Chuwi LapBook SE
Intel Celeron N4100
69.8 Points ∼32% +45%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
65 Points ∼30% +35%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
Intel Celeron N3350
48 Points ∼22%
Average Intel Celeron N3350
  (43 - 48, n=8)
46 Points ∼21% -4%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
31 Points ∼14% -35%
HP x2 210 G2
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
28 Points ∼13% -42%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 5290
Intel Core i5-8250U
721 Points ∼16% +748%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Intel Core i5-8210Y
285 Points ∼7% +235%
Lenovo ThinkPad A275
AMD PRO A12-9800B
225 Points ∼5% +165%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
164 Points ∼4% +93%
Chuwi LapBook SE
Intel Celeron N4100
161 (min: 150.45, max: 161.13) Points ∼4% +89%
Intel NUC7CJYH
Intel Celeron J4005
144 Points ∼3% +69%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
99 Points ∼2% +16%
HP x2 210 G2
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
97 Points ∼2% +14%
Average Intel Celeron N3350
  (81 - 92, n=8)
85.8 Points ∼2% +1%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
Intel Celeron N3350
85 Points ∼2%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
48 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
85 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
10.15 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad A275
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
1790 Points ∼18% +164%
Intel NUC7CJYH
UHD Graphics 600, J4005, SanDisk Ultra II
990 Points ∼10% +46%
Chuwi LapBook SE
UHD Graphics 600, N4100, SanDisk DF4032
949 Points ∼10% +40%
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500
  (678 - 792, n=6)
749 Points ∼8% +10%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
HD Graphics 500, N3350, SanDisk DF4064
678 Points ∼7%
Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad A275
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3974 Points ∼41% +128%
Intel NUC7CJYH
UHD Graphics 600, J4005, SanDisk Ultra II
3289 Points ∼34% +89%
Chuwi LapBook SE
UHD Graphics 600, N4100, SanDisk DF4032
2567 Points ∼26% +47%
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500
  (1690 - 1974, n=6)
1835 Points ∼19% +5%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
HD Graphics 500, N3350, SanDisk DF4064
1743 Points ∼18%
Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad A275
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4716 Points ∼44% +53%
Intel NUC7CJYH
UHD Graphics 600, J4005, SanDisk Ultra II
4188 Points ∼39% +36%
Chuwi LapBook SE
UHD Graphics 600, N4100, SanDisk DF4032
3776 Points ∼35% +23%
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500
  (3073 - 3510, n=6)
3214 Points ∼30% +5%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
HD Graphics 500, N3350, SanDisk DF4064
3073 Points ∼29%
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad A275
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2312 Points ∼30% +110%
Chuwi LapBook SE
UHD Graphics 600, N4100, SanDisk DF4032
1502 Points ∼19% +36%
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500
  (1102 - 1220, n=6)
1175 Points ∼15% +7%
Intel NUC7CJYH
UHD Graphics 600, J4005, SanDisk Ultra II
1136 Points ∼15% +3%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
HD Graphics 500, N3350, SanDisk DF4064
1102 Points ∼14%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad A275
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4156 Points ∼64% +93%
Intel NUC7CJYH
UHD Graphics 600, J4005, SanDisk Ultra II
3188 Points ∼49% +48%
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500
  (2148 - 2703, n=6)
2437 Points ∼37% +13%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
HD Graphics 500, N3350, SanDisk DF4064
2148 Points ∼33%
Chuwi Hi12
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, Hynix HCG8E 64 GB
1008 Points ∼15% -53%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Intel NUC7CJYH
UHD Graphics 600, J4005, SanDisk Ultra II
2212 Points ∼23%
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500
  (1814 - 1935, n=3)
1869 Points ∼20%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad A275
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2925 Points ∼48% +100%
Intel NUC7CJYH
UHD Graphics 600, J4005, SanDisk Ultra II
2084 Points ∼34% +43%
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500
  (1462 - 1816, n=8)
1670 Points ∼27% +14%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
HD Graphics 500, N3350, SanDisk DF4064
1462 Points ∼24%
Chuwi Hi12
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, Hynix HCG8E 64 GB
1039 Points ∼17% -29%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y, 64 GB eMMC Flash
741 Points ∼12% -49%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1462 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
2148 pontos
Ajuda
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
SanDisk DF4064
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
64 GB eMMC Flash
Lenovo ThinkPad A275
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Chuwi LapBook SE
SanDisk DF4032
Chuwi GBox CWI560
SanDisk DA4064
AS SSD
105%
619%
19%
Copy Game MB/s
116.51
76.48
-34%
Copy Program MB/s
72.79
44.34
-39%
Copy ISO MB/s
119.65
99.05
-17%
Score Total
103
225
118%
1177
1043%
120
17%
Score Write
31
92
197%
153
394%
36
16%
Score Read
48
88
83%
707
1373%
58
21%
Access Time Write *
1.136
0.233
79%
1.929
-70%
1.233
-9%
Access Time Read *
0.747
0.151
80%
0.094
87%
0.671
10%
4K-64 Write
12.15
44.48
266%
117
863%
9.11
-25%
4K-64 Read
27.74
40.27
45%
556
1904%
25.65
-8%
4K Write
8.42
35.07
317%
1.24
-85%
13.6
62%
4K Read
5.07
18.29
261%
21.53
325%
6.3
24%
Seq Write
102.39
126.65
24%
350
242%
131.8
29%
Seq Read
153.99
289.84
88%
1289
737%
264.1
72%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
124%
804%
8%
142%
Write 4K
7.837
26.91
243%
76.36
874%
11.17
43%
38
385%
Read 4K
7.689
19.72
156%
36.38
373%
7.2
-6%
23.84
210%
Write Seq
104.9
126.2
20%
1208
1052%
87.7
-16%
226.7
116%
Read Seq
167.8
268
60%
1191
610%
247
47%
271.8
62%
Write 4K Q32T1
13.64
62.89
361%
101
640%
12.29
-10%
44.74
228%
Read 4K Q32T1
32.95
39.82
21%
133.9
306%
32.46
-1%
53.16
61%
Write Seq Q32T1
99.46
131.3
32%
1381
1288%
92
-8%
129.4
30%
Read Seq Q32T1
128.8
259.3
101%
1785
1286%
150.1
17%
189.4
47%
Write 4K Q8T8
12.36
Read 4K Q8T8
31.66
Total Average (Program / Settings)
115% / 112%
712% / 697%
14% / 14%
142% / 142%

* ... smaller is better

SanDisk DF4064
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 128.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 99.46 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 32.95 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 13.64 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 167.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 104.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 7.689 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 7.837 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Intel UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y
1472 Points ∼8% +235%
Dell Latitude 5290
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1288 Points ∼7% +193%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y
1134 Points ∼6% +158%
Intel NUC7CJYH
Intel UHD Graphics 600, J4005
593 Points ∼3% +35%
Average Intel HD Graphics 500
  (343 - 588, n=11)
490 Points ∼3% +11%
Chuwi LapBook SE
Intel UHD Graphics 600, N4100
455 Points ∼3% +3%
Chuwi GBox CWI560
Intel UHD Graphics 600, N4100
445 Points ∼2% +1%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
Intel HD Graphics 500, N3350
440 Points ∼2%
HP x2 210 G2
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
392 Points ∼2% -11%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300
360 Points ∼2% -18%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell Latitude 5290
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1616 Points ∼3% +292%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Intel UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y
1572 Points ∼3% +282%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y
1257 Points ∼2% +205%
Intel NUC7CJYH
Intel UHD Graphics 600, J4005
579 Points ∼1% +41%
Chuwi GBox CWI560
Intel UHD Graphics 600, N4100
484 Points ∼1% +17%
Chuwi LapBook SE
Intel UHD Graphics 600, N4100
482 Points ∼1% +17%
Average Intel HD Graphics 500
  (368 - 584, n=11)
479 Points ∼1% +16%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
Intel HD Graphics 500, N3350
412 Points ∼1%
HP x2 210 G2
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
349 Points ∼1% -15%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300
299 Points ∼1% -27%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Intel UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y
286 Points ∼2%
Chuwi LapBook SE
Intel UHD Graphics 600, N4100
85 Points ∼1%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell Latitude 5290
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
960 Points ∼2%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Intel UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y
947 Points ∼2%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y
819 Points ∼2%
Intel NUC7CJYH
Intel UHD Graphics 600, J4005
448 Points ∼1%
Average Intel HD Graphics 500
  (293 - 444, n=6)
362 Points ∼1%
HP x2 210 G2
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
234 Points ∼1%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300
193 Points ∼0%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Latitude 5290
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
8194 Points ∼4% +206%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Intel UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y
7231 Points ∼4% +170%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y
6602 Points ∼4% +147%
Lenovo ThinkPad A275
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B
5481 Points ∼3% +105%
Intel NUC7CJYH
Intel UHD Graphics 600, J4005
3513 Points ∼2% +31%
Average Intel HD Graphics 500
  (2578 - 3693, n=8)
3030 Points ∼2% +13%
Chuwi LapBook SE
Intel UHD Graphics 600, N4100
2826 Points ∼2% +6%
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
Intel HD Graphics 500, N3350
2677 Points ∼1%
HP x2 210 G2
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
1841 Points ∼1% -31%
Chuwi Hi12
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300
1727 Points ∼1% -35%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y
35452 Points ∼5%
Intel NUC7CJYH
Intel UHD Graphics 600, J4005
16594 Points ∼2%
Average Intel HD Graphics 500
  (12299 - 18200, n=3)
15195 Points ∼2%
3DMark 11 Performance
461 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
1932 pontos
Ajuda
Carga Máxima
 33.8 °C41 °C25 °C 
 30 °C33.2 °C24.4 °C 
 27 °C25.6 °C24.4 °C 
Máximo: 41 °C
Médio: 29.4 °C
28.4 °C35.6 °C36.4 °C
27.4 °C32.8 °C33.4 °C
27 °C28.8 °C30.4 °C
Máximo: 36.4 °C
Médio: 31.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  32 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 40.2 °C / 104 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.6 °C / 83.5 F (+1.6 °C / 2.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.2362536.333.63133.132.44029.933.55029.531.46329.930.58030.230.910028.829.312527.328.216026.327.220026.326.625024.827.531525.130.440024.834500243963023.843.280023.747.7100023.350.9125023.356.5160022.961.1200023.157.6250023.156.1315022.854.640002354.9500022.953630022.856.2800023.158.51000022.855.31250022.947.11600022.838SPL35.367.8N2.420.2median 23.3median 47.7Delta1.111.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNuVision Encite Book 12 PlusApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (61.06 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (17.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (43.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 1.7 / 1.7 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.7 / 7 / 8 Watt
Carga midlight 14.1 / 27.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
N3350, HD Graphics 500, SanDisk DF4064, IPS, 2560x1440, 12.5
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1800x1200, 10
Dell Latitude 5290
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN LED, 1366x768, 12.5
Lenovo ThinkPad A275
PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN, 1366x768, 12.5
Chuwi LapBook SE
N4100, UHD Graphics 600, SanDisk DF4032, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Apple MacBook Air 2018
8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12
Power Consumption
14%
-44%
-43%
16%
-10%
16%
Idle Minimum *
4.7
2.88
39%
2.68
43%
4.2
11%
2.7
43%
2.2
53%
2.7
43%
Idle Average *
7
4.8
31%
4.3
39%
8.2
-17%
6.3
10%
5.7
19%
2.7
61%
Idle Maximum *
8
7.5
6%
5.2
35%
10
-25%
7.6
5%
10.3
-29%
7.2
10%
Load Average *
14.1
16.9
-20%
40.3
-186%
34.5
-145%
12.6
11%
25.6
-82%
22
-56%
Load Maximum *
27.1
23.8
12%
68
-151%
37
-37%
24.6
9%
30.6
-13%
20.5
24%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
11h 16min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 49min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 34min
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
N3350, HD Graphics 500, 31.9 Wh
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh
Dell Latitude 5290
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad A275
PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), 71 Wh
Chuwi LapBook SE
N4100, UHD Graphics 600, 37 Wh
Apple MacBook Air 2018
8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, 50.3 Wh
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh
Battery Runtime
3%
48%
29%
36%
19%
15%
Reader / Idle
676
771
14%
961
42%
WiFi v1.3
409
448
10%
606
48%
538
32%
444
9%
721
76%
501
22%
Load
214
180
-16%
243
14%
347
62%
131
-39%
231
8%

Pro

+ Tela QHD brilhante, alto contraste, alta gama de cor
+ Fino, pequeno, e design de alumínio leve
+ Slot de expansão M.2 2242/2260 disponível
+ Silencioso, sem ruído de bobina
+ Dock USB Type-C livre
+ Leitor de impressões digitais
+ Marcos estreitos
+ Econômico

Contra

- Sem leitor de SD integrado, conector de áudio, USB Type-A, HDMI, ou seguro Kensington
- Problemas de entrega de energia através de portas USB
- SSD primário e RAM soldados
- As superfícies amam digitais
- Desempenho lento do sistema
- Teclas esponjosas
- Sem opções de tela táctil
- Sem retro iluminação de teclado
- Antigo WLAN Intel 3165
- Carregamento muito lento
- PWM presente
- Base flexível
In review: NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
In review: NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus

O NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus é uma máquina desequilibrada. Aplaudimos seu foco em fornecer uma tela de alta resolução brilhante e chassi de alumínio atraente por menos de $400, mas isso vem ao custo de quase todo o resto. As opções de portas são severamente limitadas, o posicionamento da webcam não é ideal, as teclas do teclado e o trackpad são esponjosos, a base e a dobradiça poderiam ser melhores, o carregamento é muito lento e o desempenho do SSD não é tão bom quanto o de uma unidade mecânica padrão. A tela nítida e cores profundas não são suficientes para compensar o resto do portátil.

Usuários intrigados pelo formato pequeno e pelo preço fariam melhore investindo em uma Ultrabook Core i3 de última geração. Modelos mais antigos do Dell XPS, HP Spectre ou EnvyLenovo Ideapad 720s, ou até o Chuwi LapBook são capazes de oferecer muito mais do que o NuVision em quase todos os aspectos.

Uma grande tela prejudicada por teclas esponjosas e desempenho de sistema super lento. A NuVision teve que fazer muitos cortes notáveis para oferecer uma tela QHD nessa faixa de preço baixa.

NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus - 01/21/2019 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
67 /  98 → 68%
Teclado
58%
Mouse
64%
Conectividade
28 / 80 → 34%
Peso
75 / 35-78 → 92%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
45 / 68 → 66%
Desempenho da aplicação
47 / 87 → 54%
Temperatura
94 / 91 → 100%
Ruído
100%
Camera
29 / 85 → 34%
Médio
65%
77%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus (N3350, QHD)
Allen Ngo, 2019-01-23 (Update: 2019-01-24)