Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N (i5-7200U, FHD)

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 09/05/2017

O Ultrabook mais leve e brilhante de 13 polegadas. A série Notebook 9 continua a impressionar com mais uma oferta super leve por $1000. O portátil de 13 polegadas omite alguns recursos-chave em comparação com alternativas mais populares, mas alguns podem ser facilmente ignorados para o usuário diário.

Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US (Notebook 9 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7200U
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 620, Análises do: 300 MHz, Memoría: 1067 MHz, DDR4, 21.20.16.4541
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4, 1066.7 MHz, 10-10-10-28, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
13.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 166 PPI, ID: BOE06E1, Name: NV133FHB-N31, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: Leitor MicroSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 14 x 309 x 208
Bateria
30 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo de 1,5 W, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Guia de início rápido, Samsung Software Suite, Samsung PC Cleaner, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
817 g, Suprimento de energia: 114 g
Preço
1000 USD

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: MicroSD reader, USB 3.0, HDMI
Right: MicroSD reader, USB 3.0, HDMI
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, USB 3.0, USB Type-C Gen. 1, 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: AC adapter, USB 3.0, USB Type-C Gen. 1, 3.5 mm combo audio
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
107.8 MB/s ∼100% +60%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
68.72 MB/s ∼64% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
67.37 MB/s ∼62%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
250.6 MB/s ∼100% +185%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
88.07 MB/s ∼35%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
86.49 MB/s ∼35% -2%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
668 MBit/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
525 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
485 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
663 MBit/s ∼100% +28%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
575 MBit/s ∼87% +11%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
517 MBit/s ∼78%
472
cd/m²
507.9
cd/m²
488.3
cd/m²
469.7
cd/m²
510.7
cd/m²
463.4
cd/m²
457.3
cd/m²
498.4
cd/m²
458.5
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2
Máximo: 510.7 cd/m² Médio: 480.7 cd/m² Minimum: 7.17 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 510.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 774:1 (Preto: 0.66 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | - Ø
88.1% sRGB (Argyll) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.23
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
ID: BOE06E1, Name: NV133FHB-N31, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
CMN1374, IPS UWVA, 13.3, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
APPA033, IPS, 13.3, 2560x1600
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
AU Optronics AUO323D / B139HAN03.2, IPS, 13.9, 3840x2160
Response Times
-4%
12%
6%
9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41.6 (22.8, 18.8)
46 (26, 20)
-11%
32.8 (16, 16.8)
21%
42.8 (22.4, 20.4)
-3%
46 (14, 32)
-11%
Response Time Black / White *
34 (20, 14)
33 (21, 12)
3%
33.2 (10.8, 22.4)
2%
28.8 (14.8, 14)
15%
24 (6, 18)
29%
PWM Frequency
210.1 (99)
Screen
-27%
-31%
28%
-47%
Brightness
481
382
-21%
325
-32%
561
17%
310
-36%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
89
-1%
92
2%
80
-11%
Black Level *
0.66
0.35
47%
0.195
70%
0.45
32%
0.25
62%
Contrast
774
1154
49%
1801
133%
1307
69%
1392
80%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.4
5.37
-124%
7.4
-208%
1.7
29%
7.86
-228%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
6.44
-168%
6.71
-180%
1.9
21%
8.25
-244%
Gamma
2.23 108%
2.52 95%
2.74 88%
2.33 103%
2.05 117%
CCT
6747 96%
6738 96%
7222 90%
6738 96%
6834 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
58
2%
50.48
-11%
77.92
37%
58
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
88.1
89
1%
73.31
-17%
99.94
13%
90
2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-16% / -22%
-10% / -22%
17% / 23%
-19% / -36%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.8 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 210.1 Hz99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 210.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 210.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
141 Points ∼72% +15%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
139 Points ∼71% +13%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
133 Points ∼68% +8%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Core i5-6267U
131 Points ∼67% +7%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points ∼67% +6%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
125 Points ∼64% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
123 Points ∼63%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
113 Points ∼58% -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad G50-70
Intel Core i5-4200U
98 Points ∼50% -20%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel Core i5-5200U
91 Points ∼47% -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
503 Points ∼23% +53%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
383 (min: 377) Points ∼18% +17%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
343 Points ∼16% +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Core i5-6267U
339 Points ∼16% +3%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
328 Points ∼15%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
327 Points ∼15% 0%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
314 Points ∼15% -4%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
284 Points ∼13% -13%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel Core i5-5200U
257 Points ∼12% -22%
Lenovo IdeaPad G50-70
Intel Core i5-4200U
230 Points ∼11% -30%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.64 Points ∼74% +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
1.54 Points ∼70% +6%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.51 Points ∼68% +4%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
1.48 Points ∼67% +2%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.45 Points ∼66% 0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.45 Points ∼66%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
1.28 Points ∼58% -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad G50-70
Intel Core i5-4200U
1.12 Points ∼51% -23%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel Core i5-5200U
1.03 Points ∼47% -29%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.81 Points ∼24% +58%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
4.09 Points ∼17% +11%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.83 Points ∼16% +4%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.67 Points ∼15%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.63 Points ∼15% -1%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
3.16 Points ∼13% -14%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
3.15 Points ∼13% -14%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel Core i5-5200U
2.83 Points ∼12% -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad G50-70
Intel Core i5-4200U
2.5 Points ∼10% -32%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
5630 Points ∼63% +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
5010 Points ∼56% +1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
4975 Points ∼56%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
4943 Points ∼56% -1%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
4920 Points ∼55% -1%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
4904 Points ∼55% -1%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
4368 Points ∼49% -12%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel Core i5-5200U
4168 Points ∼47% -16%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
17618 Points ∼35% +55%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
11676 Points ∼23% +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
11403 Points ∼23% 0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
11373 Points ∼23%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
10906 Points ∼22% -4%
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T
Intel Core i7-6500U
10897 Points ∼22% -4%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
9723 Points ∼20% -15%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel Core i5-5200U
6550 Points ∼13% -42%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel Core i5-5200U
567.765 s * ∼7% -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
492 s * ∼6% -1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
489.402 s * ∼6%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
477.55 s * ∼6% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
456.763 s * ∼5% +7%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel Core i5-5200U
818.369 Seconds * ∼4% -30%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
668.607 Seconds * ∼3% -7%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
627.687 Seconds * ∼3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
626 Seconds * ∼3% -0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
563.28 Seconds * ∼3% +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8772
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11373
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4975
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.67 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
36.64 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.45 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
123 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
46.26 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
328 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5053 Points ∼78% +6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4928 Points ∼76% +3%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
4786 Points ∼73%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4568 Points ∼70% -5%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4769 Points ∼51% +4%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4655 Points ∼50% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
4577 Points ∼49%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4211 Points ∼45% -8%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3852 Points ∼64% +3%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3789 Points ∼63% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
3728 Points ∼62%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
3535 Points ∼59% -5%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3728 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4577 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4786 pontos
Ajuda
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T
SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
AS SSD
155%
33%
71%
-12%
Copy Game MB/s
186.76
397.86
113%
390.03
109%
189.36
1%
Copy Program MB/s
213.04
426.04
100%
188.02
-12%
204.3
-4%
Copy ISO MB/s
335.88
719.82
114%
283.3
-16%
293.55
-13%
Score Total
1057
3617
242%
1607
52%
1865
76%
1056
0%
Score Write
350
1115
219%
327
-7%
611
75%
374
7%
Score Read
463
1654
257%
870
88%
850
84%
448
-3%
Access Time Write *
0.053
0.026
51%
0.035
34%
0.028
47%
0.11
-108%
Access Time Read *
0.066
0.042
36%
0.055
17%
0.034
48%
0.076
-15%
4K-64 Write
223.84
861.58
285%
197.7
-12%
422.18
89%
271.37
21%
4K-64 Read
379.44
1464.77
286%
722.85
91%
671.28
77%
370.29
-2%
4K Write
79.23
134.4
70%
91.98
16%
132.91
68%
56.79
-28%
4K Read
31.24
56.36
80%
29.52
-6%
39.92
28%
25.89
-17%
Seq Write
466.02
1189.63
155%
372.76
-20%
559.7
20%
463.4
-1%
Seq Read
519.84
1324.96
155%
1179.3
127%
1388.73
167%
514.18
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
Sequential Read: 519.84 MB/s
Sequential Write: 466.02 MB/s
4K Read: 31.24 MB/s
4K Write: 79.23 MB/s
4K-64 Read: 379.44 MB/s
4K-64 Write: 223.84 MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.066 ms
Access Time Write: 0.053 ms
Copy ISO: 335.88 MB/s
Copy Program: 213.04 MB/s
Copy Game: 186.76 MB/s
Score Read: 463 Points
Score Write: 350 Points
Score Total: 1057 Points
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
2193 (min: 2057) Points ∼14% +48%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
1770 Points ∼11% +20%
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1609 Points ∼10% +9%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1483 Points ∼9% 0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1478 Points ∼9%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1413 Points ∼9% -4%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
1401 Points ∼9% -5%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
979 Points ∼6% -34%
Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147
Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4200U
616 Points ∼4% -58%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
2379 (min: 2355) Points ∼5% +55%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2230 Points ∼4% +45%
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1623 Points ∼3% +6%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1562 Points ∼3% +2%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1545 Points ∼3% +1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1536 Points ∼3%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
1343 Points ∼3% -13%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
1082 Points ∼2% -30%
Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147
Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4200U
703 Points ∼1% -54%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
1593 Points ∼4% +65%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
1541 (min: 1484) Points ∼4% +59%
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1045 Points ∼3% +8%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
967 Points ∼2%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
963 Points ∼2% 0%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
948 Points ∼2% -2%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
786 Points ∼2% -19%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
657 Points ∼2% -32%
Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147
Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4200U
544 Points ∼1% -44%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
11495 (min: 10969) Points ∼7% +38%
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
9060 Points ∼6% +9%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
8385 Points ∼5% +1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
8301 Points ∼5%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
8177 Points ∼5% -1%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
8104 Points ∼5% -2%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
6924 Points ∼4% -17%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
5415 Points ∼3% -35%
Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147
Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4200U
4620 Points ∼3% -44%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
49119 Points ∼7% +5%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
47546 Points ∼7% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
46817 Points ∼6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
42314 Points ∼6% -10%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
37343 Points ∼5% -20%
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Intel HD Graphics 5500, 5200U
31550 Points ∼4% -33%
3DMark 11 Performance
1695 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
64405 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6418 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
892 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
411 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 42.62624.77.6fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 20fps

Barulho

Ocioso
28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB
Carga
33.2 / 35.2 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.4 dB(A)
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
Noise
-10%
1%
-11%
-6%
-10%
off / environment *
28.4
30.4
-7%
31.7
-12%
30.2
-6%
30.7
-8%
Idle Minimum *
28.4
30.4
-7%
28.9
-2%
31.7
-12%
30.2
-6%
30.7
-8%
Idle Average *
28.4
30.4
-7%
28.9
-2%
31.7
-12%
30.2
-6%
30.7
-8%
Idle Maximum *
28.4
30.4
-7%
28.9
-2%
31.7
-12%
30.2
-6%
30.9
-9%
Load Average *
33.2
40
-20%
30.9
7%
38.4
-16%
32.9
1%
38.7
-17%
Load Maximum *
35.2
40
-14%
33.5
5%
34.7
1%
39.3
-12%
38.9
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 36.8 °C39.8 °C28.6 °C 
 33.8 °C36.2 °C25.8 °C 
 25 °C25.2 °C24.4 °C 
Máximo: 39.8 °C
Médio: 30.6 °C
32.6 °C38.8 °C36.2 °C
29.4 °C33.8 °C33 °C
28.2 °C29.8 °C30.2 °C
Máximo: 38.8 °C
Médio: 32.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  35.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.3412532.8363133.934.64032.134.45032.832.96330.133.38031.932.510030.229.912529.12916028.228.820027.332.225026.54231525.648.740025.450.35002551.763024.5478002455.2100023.959.4125023.456.7160023.256200023.550.4250023.254.9315022.956.240002356.9500023.157.1630023.161.980002358.41000023.153.91250023.258.71600023.354.5SPL35.768.8N2.524median 23.5Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01USmedian 54.5Delta1.86.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (61.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.21 / 0.55 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.8 / 11 / 11.3 Watt
Carga midlight 35.6 / 37.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS UWVA, 1920x1080, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.9
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, , IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T
7200U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
Power Consumption
16%
34%
16%
7%
23%
Idle Minimum *
3.8
3.6
5%
4.1
-8%
4.3
-13%
3.7
3%
3.3
13%
Idle Average *
11
6.4
42%
4.2
62%
6.3
43%
5.2
53%
6.2
44%
Idle Maximum *
11.3
9.2
19%
5.1
55%
9
20%
7.6
33%
10.4
8%
Load Average *
35.6
34
4%
22.1
38%
32.7
8%
41.6
-17%
28
21%
Load Maximum *
37.2
34.4
8%
29.4
21%
28.8
23%
50.5
-36%
25.7
31%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
11h 35min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
4h 39min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 00min
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 30 Wh
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 38 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 78 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 54.5 Wh
Asus Zenbook 3 UX390UA-GS041T
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh
Battery Runtime
24%
130%
125%
87%
46%
Reader / Idle
695
718
3%
1295
86%
1069
54%
844
21%
WiFi v1.3
279
394
41%
677
143%
644
131%
681
144%
397
42%
Load
60
77
28%
157
162%
174
190%
78
30%
105
75%

Pro

+ Temperaturas da superfície relativamente baixas sob uso intenso
+ A tela de Ultrabook mais brilhante para esta categoria
+ Interior acessível; atualizável SSD
+ Resposta nítida do teclado e do trackpad
+ O Ultrabook mais leve para sua categoria
+ Portas USB e HDMI de tamanho normal
+ Pode se carregar via USB Type-C
+ Leitor de impressões digitais
+ Ruído baixo da ventoinha

Contra

- Sem opções de tela táctil QHD, 4K UHD, NVMe, ou SIM
- Baixa capacidade da bateria; duração da bateria abaixo da média
- Velocidades cíclicas da CPU e GPU sob uso intenso
- PWM em quase todos os níveis de brilho
- Altas temperaturas do núcleo sob uso intenso
- A base e a tampa da tela poderiam ser mais rígidas
- Sem leitor SD de tamanho normal ou Thunderbolt 3
- Alto falantes integrados fracos
- Design muito simples do chassi
- Sem opções de paineis mate
In review: Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
In review: Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US

O Notebook 9 de 13 polegadas foi criado com um objetivo em mente - Ser o Ultrabook mais leve e mais brilhante em sua classe de tamanho. A Samsung o eliminou do parque, pois o NP900X3N não é apenas um pouco mais leve e brilhante do que o melhor, mas é significativamente assim. Combine isso com a ventoinha silenciosa, portas USB de tamanho normal e teclado respeitável e este é facilmente o melhor Ultrabook de 13 polegadas para viagens e uso em exteriores.

A abordagem feroz da Samsung para criar o mais leve Ultrabook disponível levou a alguns sacrifícios ao longo do caminho. Para manter o peso o mais baixo possível, o sistema não possui opções de tela táctil e Gorilla Glass, e sua solução de resfriamento e capacidade da bateria são bastante pequenas. Esta última revelação em particular resultou em uma duração da bateria abaixo da média para um portátil que de outra forma é excelente para uso em exteriores. A rigidez do chassi, embora não seja ruim, não está exatamente no mesmo nível do XPS 13 ou do MacBook Pro 13.

Esperamos que futuras revisões adicionem Thunderbolt 3, compatibilidade com SIM e uma opção de painel mate para tornar o Notebook 9 um companheiro de viagem ainda melhor. Até então, aqueles que querem algo mais leve e brilhante do que um XPS 13 sem sacrificar as portas USB ou HDMI de tamanho normal, como no Zenbook 3, Matebook X, Yoga 910 ou Specter 13, não ficará desapontado com a Samsung.

A tela extra brilhante e o superleve fazem deste portátil de 13 polegadas uma compra muito atraente para qualquer usuário que está constantemente em movimento. Se a duração da bateria durante todo o dia e as capacidades de ancoragem do Thunderbolt 3 forem mais importantes, no entanto, há muitas opções melhores.

Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US - 08/29/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
78 /  98 → 79%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
46 / 80 → 58%
Peso
78 / 78 → 100%
Bateria
79%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
57 / 68 → 83%
Desempenho da aplicação
87 / 87 → 99%
Temperatura
94 / 91 → 100%
Ruído
97%
Audio
40 / 91 → 44%
Camera
40 / 85 → 46%
Médio
73%
86%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N (i5-7200U, FHD)
Allen Ngo, 2017-09- 5 (Update: 2017-09-13)