Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T (i7-8550U, GeForce MX150)

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 03/14/2018

Afogamento periódico. O Notebook 9 NP900X5T teria sido um Ultrabook muito potente se não fosse por sua limitação intolerável durante os jogos.

Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US (Notebook 9 Serie)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 - 2048 MB, Análises do: 1468 MHz, Memoría: 6008 MHz, GDDR5, 385.12
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4, 1200 MHz, 10-10-10-28, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
15 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 147 PPI, ID: BOE06E8, Name: BOE HF NV150FHB-N31, IPS, 350nit (Modo exteriores: 500nit), Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: MicroSD reader, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 15.5 x 348 x 229.4
Bateria
75 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, USB Type-C to Micro-USB, McAfee Anti-Virus, Samsung Update, Samsung Settings, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.28 kg, Suprimento de energia: 207 g
Preço
1500 USD

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, USB 3.0, USB Type-C Gen. 2 + Thunderbolt 3, 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: AC adapter, USB 3.0, USB Type-C Gen. 2 + Thunderbolt 3, 3.5 mm combo audio
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Right: MicroSD reader, USB 3.0, USB 2.0, HDMI
Right: MicroSD reader, USB 3.0, USB 2.0, HDMI
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
157.5 MB/s ∼100% +105%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
120.5 MB/s ∼77% +57%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
76.9 MB/s ∼49%
Average of class Multimedia
  (of 120, min: 11.2, max: 178)
50.1 MB/s ∼32% -35%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
252.6 MB/s ∼100% +180%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
217.6 MB/s ∼86% +141%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
90.19 MB/s ∼36%
Average of class Multimedia
  (of 118, min: 10.2, max: 253)
67.4 MB/s ∼27% -25%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
668 MBit/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
648 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Microsoft Surface Book 2 15
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
501 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
529 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Microsoft Surface Book 2 15
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
527 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
497 MBit/s ∼94%
520
cd/m²
525.9
cd/m²
512.9
cd/m²
512.5
cd/m²
558.2
cd/m²
529.4
cd/m²
523.3
cd/m²
538.8
cd/m²
535.2
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 558.2 cd/m² Médio: 528.5 cd/m² Minimum: 8.23 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 558.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 1213:1 (Preto: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.41 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
97.2% sRGB (Argyll) 61.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.19
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
ID: BOE06E8, Name: BOE HF NV150FHB-N31, IPS, 15, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
IGZO IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
LG Gram 15Z975
ID: LGD052A, Name: LG Philips LP156WFA-SPC1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560)
15.4, 2880x1800
Microsoft Surface Book 2 15
LG Philips LGD0554, IPS, 15, 3240x2160
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
ID: BOE06E8, Name: BOE HF NV150FHB-N31, IPS, 15, 1920x1080
Response Times
-41%
19%
7%
226%
-30%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
46 (25.2, 20.8)
57.2 (27.2, 30)
-24%
35.2 (19.6, 15.6)
23%
42.4 (20.4, 22)
8%
37.6 (18, 19.6)
18%
40.8 (20.4, 20.4)
11%
Response Time Black / White *
29.6 (16.4, 13.2)
39.2 (23.6, 15.6)
-32%
25.6 (14.8, 10.8)
14%
28 (14.8, 13.2)
5%
22.4 (11.2, 11.2)
24%
32.4 (17.6, 14.8)
-9%
PWM Frequency
2976 (91)
961.5
-68%
21930 (50)
637%
208.3 (99)
-93%
Screen
-0%
-12%
28%
26%
16%
Brightness middle
558.2
370.1
-34%
273
-51%
534
-4%
446
-20%
565.6
1%
Brightness
528
356
-33%
276
-48%
502
-5%
444
-16%
524
-1%
Brightness Distribution
92
87
-5%
89
-3%
86
-7%
89
-3%
88
-4%
Black Level *
0.46
0.37
20%
0.22
52%
0.31
33%
0.25
46%
0.49
-7%
Contrast
1213
1000
-18%
1241
2%
1723
42%
1784
47%
1154
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.41
5.3
-20%
4.77
-8%
1.8
59%
1.7
61%
2
55%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.91
9.9
9%
10.76
1%
3.8
65%
2.7
75%
5
54%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.6
4.6
30%
8.6
-30%
2.4
64%
1.7
74%
2.5
62%
Gamma
2.19 110%
2.31 104%
1.7 141%
2.27 106%
2.11 114%
2.21 109%
CCT
7615 85%
6284 103%
6678 97%
6563 99%
6384 102%
6896 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61.3
88.3
44%
50.2
-18%
77.92
27%
58.6
-4%
61.2
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.2
100
3%
76.9
-21%
99.94
3%
92.9
-4%
97.5
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-21% / -10%
4% / -7%
18% / 24%
126% / 72%
-7% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25.2 ms rise
↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2976 Hz ≤ 91 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2976 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 91 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2976 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9953 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (of 37, min: 109, max: 172)
161 Points ∼27% +4%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
157 Points ∼27% +1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Core i7-8550U
155 Points ∼26%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
154 Points ∼26% -1%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
154 Points ∼26% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 (min: 143.11, max: 143.49) Points ∼24% -7%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
143 Points ∼24% -8%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
142 Points ∼24% -8%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
139 Points ∼24% -10%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
131 Points ∼22% -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (of 301, min: 36, max: 178)
120 Points ∼20% -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points ∼34% +35%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
724 Points ∼34% +33%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
618 Points ∼29% +14%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (of 39, min: 407, max: 761)
582 Points ∼27% +7%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Core i7-8550U
544 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018
Intel Core i5-8250U
522 (min: 490.92, max: 522.49) Points ∼24% -4%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
519 Points ∼24% -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
514 Points ∼24% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (of 304, min: 73, max: 1550)
410 Points ∼19% -25%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
397 (min: 337, max: 397) Points ∼18% -27%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
343 Points ∼16% -37%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Core i7-8550U
1.95 Points ∼86%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
1.84 Points ∼81% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (of 24, min: 1.43, max: 1.95)
1.811 Points ∼80% -7%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018
Intel Core i5-8250U
1.79 (min: 1.65, max: 1.93) Points ∼79% -8%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.78 Points ∼78% -9%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
1.77 Points ∼78% -9%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.67 Points ∼74% -14%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.64 Points ∼72% -16%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
1.61 Points ∼71% -17%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.52 Points ∼67% -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (of 396, min: 0.39, max: 1.95)
1.268 Points ∼56% -35%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points ∼34% +35%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.94 Points ∼33% +32%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
6.91 Points ∼29% +15%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (of 24, min: 4.38, max: 8.56)
6.28 Points ∼26% +4%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Core i7-8550U
6.03 Points ∼25%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.92 Points ∼25% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018
Intel Core i5-8250U
5.87 (min: 5.83, max: 6.19) Points ∼25% -3%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
5.76 Points ∼24% -4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
4.39 Points ∼18% -27%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.83 Points ∼16% -36%
Average of class Multimedia
  (of 662, min: 0.59, max: 17.6)
3.6 Points ∼15% -40%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
6501 Points ∼73% 0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Core i7-8550U
6478 Points ∼73%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (of 23, min: 4202, max: 8211)
6316 Points ∼71% -3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
6126 Points ∼69% -5%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5825 Points ∼66% -10%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
5630 Points ∼63% -13%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5550 Points ∼63% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018
Intel Core i5-8250U
5542 Points ∼62% -14%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5433 Points ∼61% -16%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
4473 Points ∼50% -31%
Average of class Multimedia
  (of 745, min: 665, max: 8211)
3523 Points ∼40% -46%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
21755 Points ∼44% +26%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21671 Points ∼44% +26%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
17971 Points ∼36% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (of 23, min: 11694, max: 24180)
17828 Points ∼36% +4%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Core i7-8550U
17215 Points ∼35%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
16466 Points ∼33% -4%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
16329 Points ∼33% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018
Intel Core i5-8250U
16272 Points ∼33% -5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
13779 Points ∼28% -20%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
11676 Points ∼23% -32%
Average of class Multimedia
  (of 742, min: 1568, max: 34776)
9256 Points ∼19% -46%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Average of class Multimedia
  (of 371, min: 206, max: 2326)
638 s * ∼8% -118%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
456.763 s * ∼5% -56%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
433 s * ∼5% -48%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
402.56 s * ∼5% -38%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
375.873 s * ∼4% -29%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (of 11, min: 258, max: 435)
351 s * ∼4% -20%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
331.085 s * ∼4% -13%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018
Intel Core i5-8250U
325.9 s * ∼4% -11%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Core i7-8550U
292.499 s * ∼3%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
214.927 s * ∼3% +27%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Average of class Multimedia
  (of 6770, min: -1, max: 135140)
1807 Seconds * ∼8% -252%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (of 64, min: 1.4, max: 7795)
1052 Seconds * ∼5% -105%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
696.928 Seconds * ∼3% -36%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
654.006 Seconds * ∼3% -27%
MSI GT80 Titan SLI
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
565.334 Seconds * ∼3% -10%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
563.28 Seconds * ∼3% -10%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
522.024 Seconds * ∼2% -2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Intel Core i7-8550U
513.599 Seconds * ∼2%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Intel Core i7-8550U
509.5 Seconds * ∼2% +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
5838
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
17215
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6478
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
74.96 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
6.03 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.95 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
104.82 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
544 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
155 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5228 Points ∼80%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4928 Points ∼76% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (of 11, min: 4063, max: 5228)
4829 Points ∼74% -8%
LG Gram 15Z975
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4736 Points ∼73% -9%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
4422 Points ∼68% -15%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4217 Points ∼65% -19%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5325 Points ∼56%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (of 7, min: 4765, max: 5550)
5136 Points ∼54% -4%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
5114 Points ∼54% -4%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
5083 Points ∼53% -5%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4769 Points ∼50% -10%
LG Gram 15Z975
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4651 Points ∼49% -13%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4130 Points ∼69%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3852 Points ∼64% -7%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (of 12, min: 3145, max: 4130)
3736 Points ∼63% -10%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
3588 Points ∼60% -13%
LG Gram 15Z975
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3557 Points ∼60% -14%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3457 Points ∼58% -16%
PCMark 10 - Score
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4106 Points ∼53%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (of 11, min: 3071, max: 4106)
3675 Points ∼47% -10%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3673 Points ∼47% -11%
LG Gram 15Z975
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3391 Points ∼44% -17%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4130 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5325 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5228 pontos
Ajuda
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
LG Gram 15Z975
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
AS SSD
4%
20%
-103%
40%
Copy Game MB/s
1057.86
539.5
-49%
648.34
-39%
179.79
-83%
1134.11
7%
Copy Program MB/s
479.55
411.54
-14%
497.88
4%
141.2
-71%
534.36
11%
Copy ISO MB/s
1750.73
1272.4
-27%
1684.56
-4%
197.53
-89%
1936.38
11%
Score Total
2646
2810
6%
3906
48%
1003
-62%
3781
43%
Score Write
628
1022
63%
928
48%
339
-46%
1556
148%
Score Read
1367
1206
-12%
2011
47%
442
-68%
1493
9%
Access Time Write *
0.032
0.034
-6%
0.03
6%
0.232
-625%
0.026
19%
Access Time Read *
0.054
0.034
37%
0.043
20%
0.08
-48%
0.04
26%
4K-64 Write
392.6
788.85
101%
673.57
72%
246.71
-37%
1262.39
222%
4K-64 Read
1084.59
961.61
-11%
1708.65
58%
366.5
-66%
1206.47
11%
4K Write
115.02
112.15
-2%
124.12
8%
67.57
-41%
141.05
23%
4K Read
48.71
41.34
-15%
48.71
0%
26.24
-46%
51.93
7%
Seq Write
1205.64
1206.58
0%
1298.57
8%
248.48
-79%
1530.14
27%
Seq Read
2336.79
2026.09
-13%
2533.21
8%
488.13
-79%
2342.26
0%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CDM 5 Read Seq Q32T1: 3418 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq Q32T1: 1276 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K Q32T1: 517.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K Q32T1: 435.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1023 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1075 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K: 47.06 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K: 162.7 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
6074 Points ∼15% +79%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4133 Points ∼10% +22%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560)
AMD Radeon Pro 560, 7820HQ
3892 (min: 3869, max: 3895) Points ∼10% +15%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
3563 Points ∼9% +5%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
3391 Points ∼8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (of 24, min: 2324, max: 3739)
3326 Points ∼8% -2%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2460 Points ∼6% -27%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
1593 Points ∼4% -53%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
1369 Points ∼3% -60%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
1315 Points ∼3% -61%
LG Gram 15Z975
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
923 Points ∼2% -73%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
31274 Points ∼17% +57%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
25986 Points ∼14% +31%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560)
AMD Radeon Pro 560, 7820HQ
23105 (min: 23091, max: 26320) Points ∼13% +16%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
20470 Points ∼11% +3%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
19884 Points ∼11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (of 23, min: 16227, max: 22183)
19571 Points ∼11% -2%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
16285 Points ∼9% -18%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
11232 Points ∼6% -44%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
10486 Points ∼6% -47%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
8385 Points ∼5% -58%
LG Gram 15Z975
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
7760 Points ∼4% -61%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
84368 Points ∼12% +90%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (of 9, min: 38250, max: 82527)
60833 Points ∼8% +37%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
45299 Points ∼6% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
44359 Points ∼6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
42314 Points ∼6% -5%
LG Gram 15Z975
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
40357 Points ∼6% -9%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
38250 Points ∼5% -14%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560)
AMD Radeon Pro 560, 7820HQ
6510 (min: 6424, max: 6636) Points ∼37% +64%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4466 Points ∼25% +13%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
4184 Points ∼24% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (of 25, min: 3236, max: 4421)
3972 Points ∼23% 0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
3965 Points ∼23%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2918 Points ∼17% -26%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
1968 Points ∼11% -50%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
1800 Points ∼10% -55%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
1838 Points ∼10% -54%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
1770 Points ∼10% -55%
LG Gram 15Z975
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1265 Points ∼7% -68%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560)
AMD Radeon Pro 560, 7820HQ
5305 (min: 5279, max: 6622) Points ∼10% +21%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4826 Points ∼9% +10%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
4564 Points ∼9% +4%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
4369 Points ∼9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (of 25, min: 2796, max: 4775)
4237 Points ∼8% -3%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
3602 Points ∼7% -18%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
2401 Points ∼5% -45%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
1980 Points ∼4% -55%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2230 Points ∼4% -49%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
2124 Points ∼4% -51%
LG Gram 15Z975
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1517 Points ∼3% -65%
3DMark 11 Performance
4642 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
46087 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
13207 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3104 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
1595 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 132.26059.730.9fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 53.441.636.317.2fps
Thief (2014) 5832.531.118.8fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 46.833.720.511fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 413620fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 6050.937.223.2fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 5534.518.617.4fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 60.935.419.216.4fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 25.216.214.1fps
Overwatch (2016) 606046.127.5fps
Prey (2017) 50.619.21410.5fps
F1 2017 (2017) 55241914fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 47211511fps
Destiny 2 (2017) 29.110.8fps
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647Tooltip
The Witcher 3 medium

Barulho

Ocioso
29.6 / 29.6 / 30.3 dB
Carga
40 / 40 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29.6 dB(A)
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
LG Gram 15Z975
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Noise
-9%
5%
6%
3%
off / environment *
29.6
28.4
4%
28.3
4%
29.2
1%
28.4
4%
Idle Minimum *
29.6
29
2%
28.3
4%
29.2
1%
28.4
4%
Idle Average *
29.6
29
2%
28.3
4%
29.2
1%
28.4
4%
Idle Maximum *
30.3
32.2
-6%
28.3
7%
29.2
4%
28.4
6%
Load Average *
40
47.1
-18%
38.3
4%
32.5
19%
41.6
-4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
40
52
-30%
36.1
10%
Load Maximum *
40
47.1
-18%
38.3
4%
37.2
7%
41.6
-4%

* ... smaller is better

 37.2 °C39 °C34.6 °C 
 32.4 °C35.8 °C24.8 °C 
 25 °C25.4 °C23 °C 
Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 30.8 °C
32.6 °C40.4 °C37.4 °C
28.8 °C36.2 °C34.4 °C
28.4 °C31.8 °C31.8 °C
Máximo: 40.4 °C
Médio: 33.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  44.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.834.62532.6353131.831.4403131.65031.7306330.429.98029.529.510028.329.312527.428.116028.326.820036.825.825046.825.831552.12540054.32450054.723.363056.723.180060.522.810006122.5125062.322.3160062.922.2200061.722250063.521.8315058.421.6400059.421.6500056.321.5630064.521.5800062.721.31000060.621.31250057.921.21600053.921.3SPL73.234.3N31.32.2median 57.9Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US median 22.3Delta71.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64.52 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.32 / 1.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.5 / 11.3 / 14.2 Watt
Carga midlight 53.3 / 56.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD, IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15
LG Gram 15Z975
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
2500U, Vega 8, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5
Power Consumption
-103%
-4%
19%
3%
32%
Idle Minimum *
3.5
11.9
-240%
5
-43%
4.4
-26%
5.9
-69%
2.7
23%
Idle Average *
11.3
17.1
-51%
11.6
-3%
9.1
19%
8.7
23%
7.6
33%
Idle Maximum *
14.2
17.3
-22%
12.2
14%
9.6
32%
10.5
26%
7.8
45%
Load Average *
53.3
94.7
-78%
47.8
10%
34.8
35%
45.7
14%
37.5
30%
Load Maximum *
56.2
122
-117%
55.7
1%
36
36%
49.4
12%
41.6
26%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50.6
104.8
-107%
51.9
-3%
45.8
9%
31.7
37%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
30h 10min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 35min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 07min
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
8550U, GeForce MX150, 75 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 97 Wh
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
7500U, GeForce 940MX, 66 Wh
LG Gram 15Z975
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
8550U, GeForce MX150, 79.2 Wh
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
2500U, Vega 8, 55.8 Wh
Battery Runtime
-35%
-8%
-23%
-20%
-47%
Reader / Idle
1810
831
-54%
1642
-9%
1078
-40%
934
-48%
655
-64%
WiFi v1.3
635
434
-32%
604
-5%
435
-31%
511
-20%
398
-37%
Load
127
103
-19%
116
-9%
131
3%
136
7%
77
-39%

Pro

+ Tela muito brilhante; mais brilhante do que o MacBook Pro 15
+ Significativa e atualização de CPU e GPU sobre o NP900X5N
+ Muito leve e portátil para a sua classe de tamanho
+ Longa duração da bateria; capacidade aumentada da bateria
+ Ventiladores silenciosos durante cargas baixas a médias
+ Interior acessível; SSD M.2 atualizável
+ Thunderbolt 3

Contra

- Afogamento extremo e muito evidente da GPU durante os jogos
- CPU incapaz de manter o Turbo Boost máximo
- Ainda não há opção de painel mate ou resolução maior
- Sem tela táctil, eSIM, NFC ou 4G
- Sem leitor de digitais integrado no botão de energia
- PWM em quase todos os níveis de brilho
- As teclas do clickpad poderiam ser mais rígidas
- Chassi e tampa mais flexíveis
- Alto falantes fracos, baixos fracos
- A dobradiça poderia ser mais firme
- RAM soldada
In review: Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T
In review: Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T

Mencionamos em nossa análise do NP900X5N que seria imprudente comprar a configuração, já que há rumores de que tanto o Kaby Lake-R quanto o Pascal parecem estar ficando obsoletos. Agora que ambos estão finalmente disponíveis, os usuários pacientes agora podem desfrutar de um aumento estimado de 60 por cento de CPU e 115 por cento de GPU sobre o i7-7500U e GeForce 940MX no modelo mais antigo. Isso se torna ainda mais impressionante ao considerar que o modelo mais recente não funciona de forma mais barulhenta, mais quente ou mais breve, por causa de seu melhor desempenho por Watt. A bateria de maior capacidade, em particular, é uma surpresa, já que as durações no modelo do ano passado já estavam acima da média. 

A maior desvantagem é o forte afogamento da GPU durante os jogos. É estranho registrar resultados de benchmarks sintéticos normais apenas para descobrir o abominável desempenho dos jogos e taxas de fotogramas amplamente variáveis. Até que tenhamos notícias da Samsung sobre o problema ou uma atualização apropriada seja lançada, não podemos recomendar o SKU mais caro com o MX150.

Tudo o resto sobre o portátil permanece inalterado para melhor ou pior. O Notebook 9 ainda não é contestado para os usuários que desejam o Ultrabook mais leve e brilhante de 15 polegadas para uso leve em qualquer lugar. Do outro lado do espectro, a rigidez da carcaça marca um bom ponto e os usuários perderão as opções 2-em-1 e tela táctil que sistemas como a série Spectre  pode oferecer. Estamos ansiosos para ver uma atualização completa da série Notebook 9, pois pensamos que a Samsung pode torná-la ainda melhor, deixando de lado a porta de carregamento de CA proprietária para o carregamento USB Type-C universal, combinando o leitor de digitais com o botão de energia e integrando o eSIM para reforçar a portabilidade do sistema.

Seja muito cauteloso se você comprar o MX150 SKU devido ao afogamento da GPU quando estiver jogando. O SKU mais acessível com apenas gráficos integrados ainda é uma excelente compra para usuários que desejam algo maior que o XPS 13, mas mais leve, brilhante e mais compacto que o XPS 15.

Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US - 03/13/2018 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
76 / 98 → 78%
Teclado
87%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
53 / 81 → 66%
Peso
72 / 20-67 → 100%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
73 / 85 → 86%
Desempenho da aplicação
92 / 92 → 100%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
90 / 95 → 95%
Audio
50%
Impressão
-2%
Médio
73%
84%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T (i7-8550U, GeForce MX150)
Allen Ngo, 2018-03-14 (Update: 2018-03-20)