Breve Análise do Portátil Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N (7500U, FHD, GeForce 940MX)

Name: Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Brand: Samsung

Leve e caro. O novo Notebook 9 traz uma tela impressionantemente brilhante que é igualmente frágil. O chassi flexível estraga uma máquina que, de outra forma, é muito portátil e confiável.

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/18/2017 🇺🇸 🇪🇸 ...

Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook Windows

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US (Notebook 9 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-7500U 2 x 2.7 - 3.5 GHz, Kaby Lake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB VRAM, Análises do: 1004 MHz, Memoría: 1800 MHz, DDR3, 375.63, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, DDR4, 1066.7 MHz, 15-15-15-36, Dual-Channel (Onboard)

Pantalha

15.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 147 PPI, ID: BOE06E8, Name: BOE HF NV150FHB-N31, IPS, 350nit (Modo exteriores: 500nit), Brilhante: sim

placa mãe

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Disco rígido

Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB

Placa de Som

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 15.4 x 347.9 x 229.4

Bateria

66 Wh Lítio-Polímero, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 15 h

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Guia de início rápido, Samsung PC Cleaner, Recovery, Update, 12 Meses Garantia

peso

1.21 kg, Suprimento de energia: 210 g

Preço

1500 USD

Links

Samsung página inicial
Samsung Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T DIN A4 ❌

Left: AC adapter, USB 2.0, USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, 3.5 mm combo audio

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)	120.5 MB/s +75%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US	68.7 MB/s
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1	64 MB/s -7%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)	252.6 MB/s +192%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1	86.9 MB/s 0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US	86.5 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	529 MBit/s +14%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	465 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	142 MBit/s -69%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	668 MBit/s
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	648 MBit/s -3%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	208 MBit/s -69%


508.3 cd/m²	545.1 cd/m²	501 cd/m²
524.7 cd/m²	565.6 cd/m²	498.9 cd/m²
520.8 cd/m²	550.5 cd/m²	501.3 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

ID: BOE06E8, Name: BOE HF NV150FHB-N31 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Máximo: 565.6 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 524 cd/m² Minimum: 7.65 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 565.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 1154:1 (Preto: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2)

	Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US ID: BOE06E8, Name: BOE HF NV150FHB-N31, IPS, 15.00, 1920x1080	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.60, 1920x1080	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) Apple APPA030, IPS, 15.40, 2880x1800	HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx UHD UWVA eDP BrightView WLED-backlit , IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160	Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 BOE NV156QUM-N44, IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160
Display		4%	28%	-3%	-0%
Display P3 Coverage	65.2	68.9 6%	99 52%	67.9 4%	70 7%
sRGB Coverage	97.7	98.9 1%	100 2%	88.2 -10%	91.1 -7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.2	70.9 6%	87.3 30%	64.4 -4%	66.7 -1%
Response Times		-47%	18981%	117%	132%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	40.8 ?(20.4, 20.4)	54 ?(33.2, 20) -32%	46 ?(18, 28) -13%	44 ?(20.4, 23.6) -8%	41.6 ?(13.2, 28.4) -2%
Response Time Black / White *	32.4 ?(17.6, 14.8)	52.4 ?(33.2, 19.2) -62%	56 ?(11, 45) -73%	38.8 ?(6.4, 32.4) -20%	15.2 ?(2, 13.2) 53%
PWM Frequency	208.3 ?(99)		119000 ?(80) 57029%	1000 ?(99) 380%	926 ?(90) 345%
Screen		-42%	-3%	-9%	-35%
Brightness middle	565.6	400 -29%	420 -26%	351.5 -38%	339 -40%
Brightness	524	392 -25%	401 -23%	336 -36%	314 -40%
Brightness Distribution	88	89 1%	90 2%	83 -6%	89 1%
Black Level *	0.49	0.26 47%	0.3 39%	0.24 51%	0.36 27%
Contrast	1154	1538 33%	1400 21%	1465 27%	942 -18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2	4.9 -145%	3.33 -67%	3.3 -65%	4.2 -110%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5	11 -120%	5.11 -2%	7.3 -46%	7.8 -56%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.5	7.2 -188%	2.73 -9%	1.9 24%	5.1 -104%
Gamma	2.21 ^100%	2.11 ^104%	2.48 ^89%	2.09 ^105%	2.16 ^102%
CCT	6896 ^94%	6911 ^94%	6457 ^101%	6784 ^96%	6569 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	61.2	64.2 5%	78.09 28%	64.4 5%	59.4 -3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	97.5	98.9 1%	99.97 3%	88.2 -10%	91 -7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-28% / -33%	6335% / 3562%	35% / 16%	32% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17.6 ms rise
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20.4 ms rise
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

208.3 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 208.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 208.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) Intel Core i7-6820HQ	154 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Intel Core i7-7500U	145 Points +4%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Intel Core i7-7500U	139 Points
Dell Latitude 5280 Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points -7%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407 Intel Core i7-6500U	127 Points -9%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE Intel Core i7-5500U	123 Points -12%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X Intel Core i7-4500U	112 Points -19%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS Intel Core i3-7100U	86 Points -38%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) Intel Core i7-6820HQ	704 Points +105%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Intel Core i7-7500U	351 Points +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Intel Core i7-7500U	343 Points
Dell Latitude 5280 Intel Core i5-7200U	328 Points -4%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407 Intel Core i7-6500U	316 Points -8%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE Intel Core i7-5500U	276 Points -20%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS Intel Core i3-7100U	256 Points -25%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X Intel Core i7-4500U	223 Points -35%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Intel Core i7-7500U	1.67 Points +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Intel Core i7-7500U	1.64 Points
Dell Latitude 5280 Intel Core i5-7200U	1.47 Points -10%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE Intel Core i7-5500U	1.43 Points -13%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X Intel Core i7-4500U	1.27 Points -23%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407 Intel Core i7-6500U	1.16 Points -29%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS Intel Core i3-7100U	1.03 Points -37%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Intel Core i7-7500U	3.87 Points +1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Intel Core i7-7500U	3.83 Points
Dell Latitude 5280 Intel Core i5-7200U	3.67 Points -4%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407 Intel Core i7-6500U	3.56 Points -7%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE Intel Core i7-5500U	3.07 Points -20%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS Intel Core i3-7100U	2.85 Points -26%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X Intel Core i7-4500U	2.4 Points -37%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) Intel Core i7-6820HQ	21079 Points +81%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Intel Core i7-7500U	11676 Points
Dell Latitude 5280 Intel Core i5-7200U	11292 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Intel Core i7-7500U	11109 Points -5%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE Intel Core i7-5500U	9543 Points -18%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407 Intel Core i7-6500U	9158 Points -22%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS Intel Core i3-7100U	8718 Points -25%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X Intel Core i7-4500U	7448 Points -36%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Intel Core i7-7500U	5630 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) Intel Core i7-6820HQ	5580 Points -1%
Dell Latitude 5280 Intel Core i5-7200U	4999 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Intel Core i7-7500U	4835 Points -14%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407 Intel Core i7-6500U	4779 Points -15%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE Intel Core i7-5500U	4695 Points -17%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X Intel Core i7-4500U	4230 Points -25%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS Intel Core i3-7100U	3871 Points -31%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS Intel Core i3-7100U	645 s * -41%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407 Intel Core i7-6500U	521 s * -14%
Dell Latitude 5280 Intel Core i5-7200U	467.3 s * -2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Intel Core i7-7500U	456.8 s *
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) Intel Core i7-6820HQ	241 s * +47%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6681

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

11676

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5630

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

49.95 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.83 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.64 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

65.3 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

343 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

139 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L	4066 Points +6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3852 Points
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11	3588 Points -7%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4928 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L	4755 Points -4%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11	4422 Points -10%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11	5114 Points +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L	4984 Points +5%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4769 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3852 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4769 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4928 pontos
Ajuda

	Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) Apple SSD SM1024L	HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK)	Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		8%	-3%	-6%	5%
Read Seq	1447	1684 16%	1458 1%	1266 -13%	1210 -16%
Write Seq	1281	1106 -14%	1440 12%	982 -23%	1134 -11%
Read 512	651	977 50%	914 40%	834 28%	789 21%
Write 512	765	1119 46%	1058 38%	714 -7%	903 18%
Read 4k	58.3	45.14 -23%	9.786 -83%	40.72 -30%	58.4 0%
Write 4k	131.9	134.1 2%	10.9 -92%	139.4 6%	144.1 9%
Read 4k QD32	545	509 -7%	679 25%	527 -3%	559 3%
Write 4k QD32	419.3	398.1 -5%	562 34%	395.2 -6%	474.4 13%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP

Sequential Read: 1447 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1281 MB/s

512K Read: 651 MB/s

512K Write: 765 MB/s

4K Read: 58.3 MB/s

4K Write: 131.9 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 545 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 419.3 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ	3220 Points +44%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U	2696 Points +21%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U	2645 Points +19%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	2576 Points +16%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	2230 Points
HP 15-ba077ng AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P	1856 Points -17%
Dell Latitude 5280 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	1309 Points -41%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54	1146 Points -49%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V Intel HD Graphics 520, 6006U	1090 Points -51%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ	2784 Points +57%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	2609 Points +47%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U	2597 Points +47%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U	2576 Points +46%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	1770 Points
HP 15-ba077ng AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P	1466 Points -17%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54	1190 Points -33%
Dell Latitude 5280 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	892 Points -50%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V Intel HD Graphics 520, 6006U	867 Points -51%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ	14594 Points +74%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U	13172 Points +57%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	11821 Points +41%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U	11513 Points +37%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	8385 Points
HP 15-ba077ng AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P	8107 Points -3%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54	6331 Points -24%
Dell Latitude 5280 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	6189 Points -26%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	2115 Points +33%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U	2113 Points +33%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ	1903 Points +19%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U	1657 Points +4%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	1593 Points
HP 15-ba077ng AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P	1213 Points -24%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54	783 Points -51%
Dell Latitude 5280 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	672 Points -58%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ	98218 Points +132%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	42314 Points
HP 15-ba077ng AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P	40461 Points -4%
Dell Latitude 5280 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	34077 Points -19%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	33758 Points -20%

3DMark 11 Performance		2372 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		49982 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		6800 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1408 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		722 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	64.3 fps +64%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO m.2 120GB	51 fps +30%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Apple SSD AP0256	47.9 fps +22%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	39.3 fps
Dell Latitude 5280 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050	18 fps -54%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075	16 fps -59%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	89.8	48.7	39.3	13.5
The Witcher 3 (2015)	31
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	95	64	24
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	37.4	20.5	10.9
Overwatch (2016)	65.2	44.8

The Witcher 3 low

Barulho

Ocioso		28.3 / 28.3 / 28.3 dB
Carga		38.3 / 38.3 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A)

	Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L	HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK)	Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Noise		-11%	-6%	-9%	-4%
off / environment *	28.3	28.4 -0%	29 -2%	28.5 -1%	29.3 -4%
Idle Minimum *	28.3	29 -2%	30.3 -7%	28.5 -1%	29.3 -4%
Idle Average *	28.3	29 -2%	30.3 -7%	28.5 -1%	29.3 -4%
Idle Maximum *	28.3	32.2 -14%	30.3 -7%	36.3 -28%	31.1 -10%
Load Average *	38.3	47.1 -23%	35.1 8%	42.7 -11%	35.2 8%
Load Maximum *	38.3	47.1 -23%	46 -20%	42.7 -11%	41.3 -8%
Witcher 3 ultra *		52

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


40 °C	40.4 °C	37.8 °C
34.2 °C	38.8 °C	29.8 °C
31.6 °C	30.4 °C	29 °C

Máximo: 40.4 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C


37.2 °C	42.4 °C	39 °C
31.2 °C	35.2 °C	34.8 °C
29.6 °C	32 °C	32.4 °C

Máximo: 42.4 °C
Médio: 34.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 38 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.8 °C / -5.1 F).

Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (58.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.3 / 0.83 Watt
Ocioso	5 / 11.6 / 12.2 Watt
Carga	47.8 / 55.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.00	Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11, IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) 6920HQ, Radeon Pro 460, Apple SSD SM1024L, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.40	HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60	Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption		-91%	-12%	-18%	28%
Idle Minimum *	5	11.9 -138%	3 40%	8.14 -63%	4.6 8%
Idle Average *	11.6	17.1 -47%	9.9 15%	10.91 6%	7.6 34%
Idle Maximum *	12.2	17.3 -42%	12.5 -2%	12.26 -0%	7.7 37%
Load Average *	47.8	94.7 -98%	70.6 -48%	45.67 4%	35.1 27%
Witcher 3 ultra *	51.9	104.8 -102%
Load Maximum *	55.7	122 -119%	90.8 -63%	74.94 -35%	36.2 35%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		27h 22min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 04min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 56min

	Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 66 Wh	Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) 6920HQ, Radeon Pro 460, 76 Wh	HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 79.2 Wh	Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh	Apple MacBook 13" T7200, Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950, Wh
Battery Runtime		-29%	-27%	-10%	-53%	-37%
Reader / Idle	1642	831 -49%		866 -47%	614 -63%	390 -76%
WiFi v1.3	604	434 -28%	619 2%	535 -11%	259 -57%
Load	116	103 -11%	52 -55%	148 28%	70 -40%	120 3%

Pro

+ Manutenção simples; SSD M.2 atualizável

+ Tela impressionantemente viva e colorida

+ Iluminação de fundo muito brilhante; Modo exteriores

+ Cobertura sRGB quase completa

+ Muito leve e portável

+ Suporte para Thunderbolt 3

+ Teclado confortável

+ Ventoinhas silenciosas; sem pulsações

+ Longa duração da bateria

+ Chassi de metal

Contra

- Sem tela táctil, mate, ou opções com resoluções mais altas

- Tampa muito frágil; ausência de vidro borda-a-borda

- GeForce 940MX com RAM DDR3 mais lenta

- O volume máximo poderia ser mais forte

- RAM sem opção para atualização

- Sem leitor SD de tamanho normal

- Sem opções de WWAN

- Caro

In review: Samsung Notebook 9 Always NP900X5N-X01US

O Notebook 9 NP900X5N se destaca em muitas categorias, mas perde a marca em algumas áreas chave. Elogiamos o fabricante por oferecer uma tela tão brilhante de 1080p em um sistema extremamente leve e ainda ter opções de gráficos discretos disponíveis. Se o brilho, a portabilidade, a autonomia, a conectividade do Thunderbolt e os gráficos da GeForce forem prioritários, o Notebook 9 torna-se uma recomendação fácil, especialmente se os usuários encontrarem as telas tácteis, alternativas frívolas ou que as alternativas de 14 polegadas são muito pequenas para a produtividade.

O aparelho da Samsung está longe de ser perfeito e é meramente médio na rigidez do chassi com algumas opções de configuração de tela estranhas. Por mais agradável que seja a tela com marcos finos, é muito mais flexível do que os concorrentes atualmente têm para oferecer. É estranho que tela refletiva seja obrigatória e ainda não possua proteção de Gorilla Glass ou opções de telas tácteis que normalmente o acompanham. A presença de PWM em quase todos os níveis de brilho é outro fator que alguns usuários podem querer considerar antes da compra.

Além disso, ficamos decepcionados ao ver apenas a versão DDR3 da GeForce 940MX em vez da versão GDDR5 superior, especialmente porque esta GPU específica está envelhecendo muito rapidamente. A Nvidia em breve lançará a GeForce MX150 para portáteis finos e leves que, essencialmente, deixará a série 940MX obsoleta.

Finalmente, o sistema tem preços bastante elevados de $1400 por nossa configuração específica. Os pontos positivos ainda superam os negativos, desde que os proprietários possam evitar quaisquer colisões e contusões na frágil tampa.

O novo Notebook 9 é exclusivo devido à sua tela de 15,0 polegadas que ocupa um vazio entre portáteis de 14 e 15,6 polegadas. É surpreendentemente portátil e confortável de usar, especialmente para viajantes constantes, mas o chassi poderia ter se beneficiado de mais reforço.

Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US - 2017-06-15 06/15/2017 v6^(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento

76 / 98 → 78%

Teclado

87%

Mouse

86%

Conectividade

53 / 81 → 66%

Peso

73 / 20-67 → 100%

Bateria

93%

Pantalha

88%

Desempenho do jogos

64 / 85 → 75%

Desempenho da aplicação

89 / 92 → 97%

Temperatura

92%

Ruído

95 / 95 → 100%

Audio

50%

Camera

45 / 85 → 53%

Médio

76%

86%

Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5190 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N (7500U, FHD, GeForce 940MX)

Allen Ngo, 2017-06-18 (Update: 2017-06-22)