Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N (7500U, FHD, GeForce 940MX)

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 06/18/2017

Leve e caro. O novo Notebook 9 traz uma tela impressionantemente brilhante que é igualmente frágil. O chassi flexível estraga uma máquina que, de outra forma, é muito portátil e confiável.

Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US (Notebook 9 Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB, Análises do: 1004 MHz, Memoría: 1800 MHz, DDR3, 375.63, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4, 1066.7 MHz, 15-15-15-36, Dual-Channel (Onboard)
Pantalha
15 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 147 PPI, ID: BOE06E8, Name: BOE HF NV150FHB-N31, IPS, 350nit (Modo exteriores: 500nit), Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 15.4 x 347.9 x 229.4
Bateria
66 Wh Lítio-Polímero, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 15 h
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Guia de início rápido, Samsung PC Cleaner, Recovery, Update, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.21 kg, Suprimento de energia: 210 g
Preço
1500 USD

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: MicroSD reader, 2x USB 3.0, HDMI
Right: MicroSD reader, 2x USB 3.0, HDMI
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, USB 2.0, USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: AC adapter, USB 2.0, USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, 3.5 mm combo audio
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
120.5 MB/s ∼100% +75%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
68.72 MB/s ∼57%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
64 MB/s ∼53% -7%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
252.6 MB/s ∼100% +192%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
86.9 MB/s ∼34% 0%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
86.49 MB/s ∼34%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
668 MBit/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
648 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
208 MBit/s ∼31% -69%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
529 MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
465 MBit/s ∼88%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
142 MBit/s ∼27% -69%
508.3
cd/m²
545.1
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
524.7
cd/m²
565.6
cd/m²
498.9
cd/m²
520.8
cd/m²
550.5
cd/m²
501.3
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 565.6 cd/m² Médio: 524 cd/m² Minimum: 7.65 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 565.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 1154:1 (Preto: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | - Ø
97.5% sRGB (Argyll) 61.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.21
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
ID: BOE06E8, Name: BOE HF NV150FHB-N31, IPS, 15, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.6, 1920x1080
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Apple APPA030, IPS, 15.4, 2880x1800
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
UHD UWVA eDP BrightView WLED-backlit , IPS, 15.6, 3840×2160
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
BOE NV156QUM-N44, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
Response Times
-47%
18981%
117%
132%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40.8 (20.4, 20.4)
54 (33.2, 20)
-32%
46 (18, 28)
-13%
44 (20.4, 23.6)
-8%
41.6 (13.2, 28.4)
-2%
Response Time Black / White *
32.4 (17.6, 14.8)
52.4 (33.2, 19.2)
-62%
56 (11, 45)
-73%
38.8 (6.4, 32.4)
-20%
15.2 (2, 13.2)
53%
PWM Frequency
208.3 (99)
119000 (80)
57029%
1000 (99)
380%
925.9 (90)
345%
Screen
-34%
-1%
-1%
-32%
Brightness
524
392
-25%
401
-23%
336
-36%
314
-40%
Brightness Distribution
88
89
1%
90
2%
83
-6%
89
1%
Black Level *
0.49
0.26
47%
0.3
39%
0.24
51%
0.36
27%
Contrast
1154
1538
33%
1400
21%
1465
27%
942
-18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2
4.9
-145%
3.33
-67%
3.3
-65%
4.2
-110%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
7.2
-188%
2.73
-9%
1.9
24%
5.1
-104%
Gamma
2.21 109%
2.11 114%
2.48 97%
2.09 115%
2.16 111%
CCT
6896 94%
6911 94%
6457 101%
6784 96%
6569 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61.2
64.2
5%
78.09
28%
64.4
5%
59.4
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.5
98.9
1%
99.97
3%
88.2
-10%
91
-7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-41% / -37%
9490% / 5176%
58% / 31%
50% / 13%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (43.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 208.3 Hz99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 208.3 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 208.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5069 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
154 Points ∼79% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
145 Points ∼74% +4%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
139 Points ∼71%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼66% -7%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
127 Points ∼65% -9%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE
Intel Core i7-5500U
123 Points ∼63% -12%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
Intel Core i7-4500U
112 Points ∼57% -19%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
86 Points ∼44% -38%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
704 Points ∼33% +105%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
351 Points ∼16% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
343 Points ∼16%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
328 Points ∼15% -4%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
316 Points ∼15% -8%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE
Intel Core i7-5500U
276 Points ∼13% -20%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
256 Points ∼12% -25%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
Intel Core i7-4500U
223 Points ∼10% -35%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.67 Points ∼76% +2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.64 Points ∼74%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.47 Points ∼67% -10%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE
Intel Core i7-5500U
1.43 Points ∼65% -13%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
Intel Core i7-4500U
1.27 Points ∼57% -23%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
1.16 Points ∼52% -29%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
1.03 Points ∼47% -37%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.87 Points ∼16% +1%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.83 Points ∼16%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.67 Points ∼15% -4%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
3.56 Points ∼15% -7%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE
Intel Core i7-5500U
3.07 Points ∼13% -20%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
2.85 Points ∼12% -26%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
Intel Core i7-4500U
2.4 Points ∼10% -37%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
5630 Points ∼63%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
5580 Points ∼63% -1%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
4999 Points ∼56% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
4835 Points ∼54% -14%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
4779 Points ∼54% -15%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE
Intel Core i7-5500U
4695 Points ∼53% -17%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
Intel Core i7-4500U
4230 Points ∼48% -25%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
3871 Points ∼44% -31%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
21079 Points ∼42% +81%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
11676 Points ∼23%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
11292 Points ∼23% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
11109 Points ∼22% -5%
Lenovo U31-70 80M5003EGE
Intel Core i7-5500U
9543 Points ∼19% -18%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
9158 Points ∼18% -22%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
8718 Points ∼18% -25%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
Intel Core i7-4500U
7448 Points ∼15% -36%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
644.6 s * ∼8% -41%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
521.22 s * ∼6% -14%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
467.287 s * ∼6% -2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
456.763 s * ∼5%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
241 s * ∼3% +47%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
817.6 Seconds * ∼4% -45%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X
Intel Core i7-4500U
675.39 Seconds * ∼3% -20%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
655.742 Seconds * ∼3% -16%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel Core i7-6500U
645.84 Seconds * ∼3% -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
581 Seconds * ∼3% -3%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
563.28 Seconds * ∼3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6681
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11676
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5630
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
49.95 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.83 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.64 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
65.32 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
343 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
139 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4928 Points ∼76%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L
4755 Points ∼73% -4%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
4422 Points ∼68% -10%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
5114 Points ∼55% +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L
4984 Points ∼54% +5%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4769 Points ∼51%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L
4066 Points ∼68% +6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3852 Points ∼64%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
3588 Points ∼60% -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3852 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4769 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4928 pontos
Ajuda
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Apple SSD SM1024L
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK)
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
8%
-3%
-6%
5%
Write 4k QD32
419.3
398.1
-5%
562.1
34%
395.2
-6%
474.4
13%
Read 4k QD32
545.3
509.1
-7%
679.3
25%
527.2
-3%
558.9
2%
Write 4k
131.9
134.1
2%
10.9
-92%
139.4
6%
144.1
9%
Read 4k
58.35
45.14
-23%
9.786
-83%
40.72
-30%
58.42
0%
Write 512
764.7
1119
46%
1058
38%
713.9
-7%
903.4
18%
Read 512
651.2
977.4
50%
913.7
40%
834.2
28%
788.7
21%
Write Seq
1281
1106
-14%
1440
12%
981.5
-23%
1134
-11%
Read Seq
1447
1684
16%
1458
1%
1266
-13%
1210
-16%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Sequential Read: 1447 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1281 MB/s
512K Read: 651.2 MB/s
512K Write: 764.7 MB/s
4K Read: 58.35 MB/s
4K Write: 131.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 545.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 419.3 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
2784 Points ∼17% +57%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2609 Points ∼16% +47%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
2597 Points ∼16% +47%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7200U
2576 Points ∼16% +46%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
1770 Points ∼11%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P
1466 Points ∼9% -17%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54
1190 Points ∼7% -33%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
892 Points ∼6% -50%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6006U
867 Points ∼5% -51%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
3220 Points ∼6% +44%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
2696 Points ∼5% +21%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7200U
2645 Points ∼5% +19%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2576 Points ∼5% +16%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2230 Points ∼4%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P
1856 Points ∼4% -17%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1309 Points ∼3% -41%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54
1146 Points ∼2% -49%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6006U
1090 Points ∼2% -51%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2115 Points ∼5% +33%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7200U
2113 Points ∼5% +33%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
1903 Points ∼5% +19%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
1657 Points ∼4% +4%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
1593 Points ∼4%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P
1213 Points ∼3% -24%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54
783 Points ∼2% -51%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
672 Points ∼2% -58%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
14594 Points ∼9% +74%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
13172 Points ∼8% +57%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
11821 Points ∼7% +41%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7200U
11513 Points ∼7% +37%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
8385 Points ∼5%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P
8107 Points ∼5% -3%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y54
6331 Points ∼4% -24%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
6189 Points ∼4% -26%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ
98218 Points ∼26% +132%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
42314 Points ∼11%
HP 15-ba077ng
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P
40461 Points ∼11% -4%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
34077 Points ∼9% -19%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
33758 Points ∼9% -20%
3DMark 11 Performance
2372 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
49982 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6800 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1408 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
722 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
64.3 fps ∼100% +64%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK
Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO m.2 120GB
51 fps ∼79% +30%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Apple SSD AP0256
47.9 fps ∼74% +22%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
39.3 fps ∼61%
Dell Latitude 5280
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050
18 fps ∼28% -54%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V
HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075
16 fps ∼25% -59%
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 89.848.739.313.5fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 31fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 956424fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 37.420.510.9fps
Overwatch (2016) 65.244.8fps
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728Tooltip
The Witcher 3 low

Barulho

Ocioso
28.3 / 28.3 / 28.3 dB
Carga
38.3 / 38.3 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.3 dB(A)
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK)
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Noise
-11%
-6%
-9%
-4%
off / environment *
28.3
28.4
-0%
29
-2%
28.5
-1%
29.3
-4%
Idle Minimum *
28.3
29
-2%
30.3
-7%
28.5
-1%
29.3
-4%
Idle Average *
28.3
29
-2%
30.3
-7%
28.5
-1%
29.3
-4%
Idle Maximum *
28.3
32.2
-14%
30.3
-7%
36.3
-28%
31.1
-10%
Load Average *
38.3
47.1
-23%
35.1
8%
42.7
-11%
35.2
8%
Load Maximum *
38.3
47.1
-23%
46
-20%
42.7
-11%
41.3
-8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
52

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 40 °C40.4 °C37.8 °C 
 34.2 °C38.8 °C29.8 °C 
 31.6 °C30.4 °C29 °C 
Máximo: 40.4 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C
37.2 °C42.4 °C39 °C
31.2 °C35.2 °C34.8 °C
29.6 °C32 °C32.4 °C
Máximo: 42.4 °C
Médio: 34.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  38 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203637.12535.338.93132.934.44033.731.85032.932.56332.632.38030.530.710028.230.312529.229.716027.72820025.931250264131525.647.540025.747.850024.347.563023.846.780022.954100022.856.8125022.556.2160022.453.220002253250021.953.6315021.750.6400021.853500021.745.3630021.655.3800021.858.21000021.8581250021.855.41600021.848.7SPL34.666.2N2.320.3median 22.5Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01USmedian 50.6Delta2.1635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (58.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.83 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5 / 11.6 / 12.2 Watt
Carga midlight 47.8 / 55.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD, IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
6920HQ, Radeon Pro 460, Apple SSD SM1024L, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
7500U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK), IPS, 3840×2160 , 15.6
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-91%
-12%
-18%
28%
Idle Minimum *
5
11.9
-138%
3
40%
8.14
-63%
4.6
8%
Idle Average *
11.6
17.1
-47%
9.9
15%
10.91
6%
7.6
34%
Idle Maximum *
12.2
17.3
-42%
12.5
-2%
12.26
-0%
7.7
37%
Load Average *
47.8
94.7
-98%
70.6
-48%
45.67
4%
35.1
27%
Load Maximum *
55.7
122
-119%
90.8
-63%
74.94
-35%
36.2
35%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51.9
104.8
-102%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
27h 22min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
10h 04min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 56min
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
7500U, GeForce 940MX, 66 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 97 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
6920HQ, Radeon Pro 460, 76 Wh
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
7500U, GeForce 940MX, 79.2 Wh
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Apple MacBook 13"
T7200, Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950,  Wh
Battery Runtime
-29%
-27%
-10%
-53%
-37%
Reader / Idle
1642
831
-49%
866
-47%
614
-63%
390
-76%
WiFi v1.3
604
434
-28%
619
2%
535
-11%
259
-57%
Load
116
103
-11%
52
-55%
148
28%
70
-40%
120
3%

Pro

+ Manutenção simples; SSD M.2 atualizável
+ Tela impressionantemente viva e colorida
+ Iluminação de fundo muito brilhante; Modo exteriores
+ Cobertura sRGB quase completa
+ Muito leve e portável
+ Suporte para Thunderbolt 3
+ Teclado confortável
+ Ventoinhas silenciosas; sem pulsações
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Chassi de metal

Contra

- Sem tela táctil, mate, ou opções com resoluções mais altas
- Tampa muito frágil; ausência de vidro borda-a-borda
- GeForce 940MX com RAM DDR3 mais lenta
- O volume máximo poderia ser mais forte
- RAM sem opção para atualização
- Sem leitor SD de tamanho normal
- Sem opções de WWAN
- Caro
In review: Samsung Notebook 9 Always NP900X5N-X01US
In review: Samsung Notebook 9 Always NP900X5N-X01US

O Notebook 9 NP900X5N se destaca em muitas categorias, mas perde a marca em algumas áreas chave. Elogiamos o fabricante por oferecer uma tela tão brilhante de 1080p em um sistema extremamente leve e ainda ter opções de gráficos discretos disponíveis. Se o brilho, a portabilidade, a autonomia, a conectividade do Thunderbolt e os gráficos da GeForce forem prioritários, o Notebook 9 torna-se uma recomendação fácil, especialmente se os usuários encontrarem as telas tácteis, alternativas frívolas ou que as alternativas de 14 polegadas são muito pequenas para a produtividade.

O aparelho da Samsung está longe de ser perfeito e é meramente médio na rigidez do chassi com algumas opções de configuração de tela estranhas. Por mais agradável que seja a tela com marcos finos, é muito mais flexível do que os concorrentes atualmente têm para oferecer. É estranho que tela refletiva seja obrigatória e ainda não possua proteção de Gorilla Glass ou opções de telas tácteis que normalmente o acompanham. A presença de PWM em quase todos os níveis de brilho é outro fator que alguns usuários podem querer considerar antes da compra.

Além disso, ficamos decepcionados ao ver apenas a versão DDR3 da GeForce 940MX em vez da versão GDDR5 superior, especialmente porque esta GPU específica está envelhecendo muito rapidamente. A Nvidia em breve lançará a GeForce MX150 para portáteis finos e leves que, essencialmente, deixará a série 940MX obsoleta.

Finalmente, o sistema tem preços bastante elevados de $1400 por nossa configuração específica. Os pontos positivos ainda superam os negativos, desde que os proprietários possam evitar quaisquer colisões e contusões na frágil tampa.

O novo Notebook 9 é exclusivo devido à sua tela de 15,0 polegadas que ocupa um vazio entre portáteis de 14 e 15,6 polegadas. É surpreendentemente portátil e confortável de usar, especialmente para viajantes constantes, mas o chassi poderia ter se beneficiado de mais reforço.

Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US - 06/15/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
76 / 98 → 78%
Teclado
87%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
53 / 81 → 66%
Peso
73 / 67 → 100%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
64 / 85 → 75%
Desempenho da aplicação
89 / 92 → 97%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
95 / 95 → 100%
Audio
50%
Camera
45 / 85 → 53%
Médio
76%
86%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N (7500U, FHD, GeForce 940MX)
Allen Ngo, 2017-06-18 (Update: 2017-06-22)