Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Core 17 (Core i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, Tela de 144-Hz) Tongfang GK7CP6R

Gamer despretensioso. O hardware do Schenker XMG Core 17 roda todos os jogos atuais fluentemente na tela mate de 17,3 polegadas (144 Hz, FHD, IPS). Este portátil pode ser configurado de forma muito individual. Por exemplo, oferece espaço para até três unidades de armazenamento (2x M.2-2280, 1x 2,5 pol.) e pode suportar até 64 GB de memória de trabalho. Além disso, o BIOS permite a redução da voltagem da CPU e do iGPU. Embora o portátil não mostre nenhuma grande fraqueza, poderíamos reclamar da falta de uma porta Thunderbolt-3.
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1455 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, conexão de 192-bits, ForceWare 430.86, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, DDR4-2666, dual-channel, dois slots de armazenamento (ambos ocupados), 64 GB máx.
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB1 (LGD0615), IPS, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, 500 GB 
, 2 slots M.2 (RAID 0/1), 1 slot de 2,5 polegadas, 431 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: porta para fones, porta para microfone, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, MMC, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 30 x 396 x 261
Bateria
46.74 Wh, 4100 mAh Lítio-Ion, 11,4 V
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Sistema 2.1, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 180-watts, mouse pad, DVD de recuperação, armação para disco rígido de 2,5 polegadas, anel de chave, memória USB (16 GB), Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.5 kg, Suprimento de energia: 428 g
Preço
1600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

418.5 mm 288.7 mm 29.9 mm 2.9 kg413 mm 305 mm 21.95 mm 2.9 kg404 mm 295.8 mm 25 mm 3.2 kg396 mm 261 mm 30 mm 2.5 kg397 mm 269 mm 29 mm 2.6 kg396 mm 261 mm 27.5 mm 2.5 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)
98.4 MB/s +294%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s +220%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s +216%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s +204%
Dell G7 17 7790
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28.2 MB/s +13%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
121.3 MB/s +349%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s +226%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s +222%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84.8 MB/s +214%
Dell G7 17 7790
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33.71 MB/s +25%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)
1139 MBit/s +70%
Dell G7 17 7790
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
678 MBit/s +1%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
676 MBit/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
674 MBit/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
670 MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
579 MBit/s -14%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
373 MBit/s -44%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
328 (311min - 338max) MBit/s -51%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)
1379 MBit/s +100%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
690 MBit/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
689 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
664 MBit/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
663 MBit/s -4%
Dell G7 17 7790
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
653 MBit/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
630 MBit/s -9%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
353 (343min - 359max) MBit/s -49%
Input devices
Input devices
273
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
329
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
273
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB1 (LGD0615) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 329 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 286 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
iluminação: 79 %
iluminação com acumulador: 329 cd/m²
Contraste: 1097:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.52 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.31
ΔE Greyscale 2.98 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB1 (LGD0615), IPS, 1920x1080
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6), IPS, 1920x1080
Dell G7 17 7790
AU Optronics AUO409D, B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Chi Mei CMN1747, TN, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
LP173WF4-SPF6, IPS, 1920x1080
Display
-1%
-5%
-1%
25%
-4%
Display P3 Coverage
64.4
65.2
1%
61.9
-4%
63.4
-2%
89.9
40%
66.4
3%
sRGB Coverage
95.6
92.2
-4%
89.6
-6%
94.9
-1%
100
5%
84.9
-11%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.6
66.5
1%
63.2
-4%
65.1
-1%
85.1
30%
62.1
-5%
Response Times
-28%
-22%
26%
27%
-153%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8)
18.8 ?(9.6, 9.2)
-31%
17.2 ?(7.6, 9.6)
-19%
8 ?(4, 4)
44%
9 ?(5, 4)
37%
36.8 ?(18.8, 18)
-156%
Response Time Black / White *
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
-25%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
-25%
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
8%
8 ?(6, 2)
17%
24 ?(14, 10)
-150%
PWM Frequency
971 ?(99)
25510 ?(17)
25000 ?(20)
Screen
2%
-24%
6%
-62%
-46%
Brightness middle
329
304
-8%
308.6
-6%
420
28%
326
-1%
328.7
0%
Brightness
286
289
1%
299
5%
393
37%
309
8%
318
11%
Brightness Distribution
79
90
14%
92
16%
91
15%
82
4%
91
15%
Black Level *
0.3
0.26
13%
0.29
3%
0.32
-7%
0.27
10%
0.51
-70%
Contrast
1097
1169
7%
1064
-3%
1313
20%
1207
10%
645
-41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.52
2.65
-5%
4.26
-69%
3.04
-21%
9.11
-262%
4.91
-95%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.9
6.11
11%
7.83
-13%
7.22
-5%
14.14
-105%
10.15
-47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.31
1.5
-15%
2.93
-124%
0.89
32%
2.62
-100%
4.27
-226%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.98
2.75
8%
5
-68%
3.91
-31%
11.17
-275%
3.9
-31%
Gamma
2.38 92%
2.46 89%
2.07 106%
2.26 97%
2.28 96%
2.13 103%
CCT
6738 96%
6763 96%
7488 87%
7138 91%
12475 52%
6911 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
60
0%
57.8
-4%
60
0%
76
27%
55.6
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
95
92
-3%
89.2
-6%
95
0%
100
5%
84.7
-11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-9% / -2%
-17% / -20%
10% / 7%
-3% / -34%
-68% / -51%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 6.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
 
0651301952603253904555205856507157808459109751040110511701235Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1010 (998.28-1099.87)
Dell G7 17 7790 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1081 (1056.8-1189.87)
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1125 (1112.04-1191.93)
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1041 (976.49-1204.86)
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1193 (1158.58-1229.48)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø969 (904.79-1042.12)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H; Enthusiast-Profil: Ø1168 (1153.8-1252.2)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H; Overboost-Profil: Ø1166 (1153.04-1244.01)
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Enthusiast profile)
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Enthusiast profile)
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Overboost profile)
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Overboost profile)
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6895
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
32729
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8212
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
180 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1100 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
117.9 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=231, last 2 years)
268 Points +49%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H
191 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H (Overboost-Profil)
179 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H (Enthusiast-Profil)
178 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Intel Core i7-8750H
173 Points -4%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points -6%
Dell G7 17 7790
Intel Core i7-8750H
164 Points -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=232, last 2 years)
3090 Points +181%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H (Enthusiast-Profil)
1252 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H (Overboost-Profil)
1244 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Intel Core i7-8750H
1230 Points +12%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1205 Points +10%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H
1191 Points +8%
Dell G7 17 7790
Intel Core i7-8750H
1183 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
1100 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
1042 Points -5%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (5719 - 15819, n=24, last 2 years)
9030 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
6895 Points
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (32456 - 112749, n=24, last 2 years)
58921 Points +80%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
32729 Points
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=228, last 2 years)
698 Points +58%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
441 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=228, last 2 years)
7423 Points +205%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
2434 Points
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
22548 Points
32 Bit Single-Core Score
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
4428 Points
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (31241 - 71700, n=26, last 2 years)
48889 Points +123%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
21933 Points
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5986 - 8936, n=26, last 2 years)
7580 Points +39%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H
5438 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1107 ms * -6%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H
1058 ms * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44)
1049 ms *
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 824, n=210, last 2 years)
520 ms * +50%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (69893 - 111243, n=52, last 2 years)
92245 Points +149%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H
38007 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44)
37119 Points
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Core i7-8750H
33194 Points -11%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (357 - 650, n=27, last 2 years)
493 Points +82%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44)
270.4 Points
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H
262.8 Points -3%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Core i7-8750H
251.4 Points -7%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score
6946 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4401 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4153 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5697 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
5657 pontos
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7580 Points +34%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H (Overboost-Profil)
5829 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H (Enthusiast-Profil)
5815 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5657 Points
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5440 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5411 Points -4%
Dell G7 17 7790
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
5279 Points -7%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
5049 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4982 Points -12%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4166 - 6653, n=34, last 2 years)
5222 Points +19%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
4401 Points
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4231 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4148 Points -6%
Dell G7 17 7790
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
4010 Points -9%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
Points -100%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4622 - 7085, n=32, last 2 years)
6048 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5697 Points
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5636 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
5340 Points -6%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
5340 Points -6%
Dell G7 17 7790
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
5315 Points -7%
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Sequential Read: 1189 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1510 MB/s
512K Read: 665 MB/s
512K Write: 762 MB/s
4K Read: 57.8 MB/s
4K Write: 115.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 611 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 530 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Dell G7 17 7790
Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-5%
-48%
-40%
-23%
-58%
Write 4K
99.3
92.7
-7%
78.6
-21%
105.8
7%
104.7
5%
71.4
-28%
Read 4K
38.47
41.4
8%
31.89
-17%
27.89
-28%
37.39
-3%
29.98
-22%
Write Seq
1449
1363
-6%
230.4
-84%
270.8
-81%
866
-40%
129.6
-91%
Read Seq
1237
1259
2%
925
-25%
879
-29%
944
-24%
843
-32%
Write 4K Q32T1
364.4
289.7
-20%
159.1
-56%
273.3
-25%
293.3
-20%
88.9
-76%
Read 4K Q32T1
421.9
337.5
-20%
315.6
-25%
361.2
-14%
374.3
-11%
196.4
-53%
Write Seq Q32T1
3276
3332
2%
230.7
-93%
253
-92%
1064
-68%
130.5
-96%
Read Seq Q32T1
3338
3477
4%
1323
-60%
1505
-55%
2616
-22%
1037
-69%
3DMark 11 (mains operation, Balanced profile)
3DMark 11 (mains operation, Balanced profile)
3DMark 11 (battery operation)
3DMark 11 (battery operation)
3DMark 11 (mains operation, Enthusiast profile)
3DMark 11 (mains operation, Enthusiast profile)
3DMark 11 (mains operation, Overboost profile)
3DMark 11 (mains operation, Overboost profile)
3DMark 06 Standard Score
38141 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
16657 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
109442 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
34040 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
12816 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
5578 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=231, last 2 years)
40470 Points +111%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
25248 Points +32%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22523 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (Overboost-Profil)
20940 Points +9%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
20181 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (Enthusiast-Profil)
19371 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
19156 Points
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14534 Points -24%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)
136246 Points +40%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
111855 Points +15%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
103428 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
97189 Points
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
70598 Points -27%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
70496 Points -27%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
50732 Points -48%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=235, last 2 years)
29450 Points +103%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
19800 Points +36%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17466 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (Overboost-Profil)
15482 Points +7%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
15088 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
14537 Points
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (Enthusiast-Profil)
14486 Points 0%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11752 Points -19%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7860 Points -46%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=233, last 2 years)
12063 Points +121%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6695 Points +23%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (Overboost-Profil)
5895 Points +8%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
5657 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
5464 Points
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (Enthusiast-Profil)
5451 Points 0%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years)
117.1 fps +120%
Dell G7 17 7790
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
64.7 fps +21%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
57.6 (46min) fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
53.3 fps
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
26 fps -51%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
24 fps -55%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
142.2 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
136.2 fps
Dell G7 17 7790
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
133.6 fps -2%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
74.5 fps -45%
Rage 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (Resolution Scale Off)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
68.8 fps
Far Cry New Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (82 - 131, n=5, last 2 years)
103 fps +32%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
78 fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H (Overboost-Profil)
73 fps -6%
Anno 1800 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality (DX11)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
39.6 fps
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
35.86 fps -9%
For Honor - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
93.1 fps
F1 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H (Overboost-Profil)
99 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
92 fps
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB: Ø54.5 (52-58)
Dell G7 17 7790 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G: Ø60.8 (54-65)
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1: Ø58.4 (50-62)
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7: Ø29 (2-31)
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G: Ø24.9 (22-28)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø73.8 (65-79)
GPU measurements while running our The Witcher 3 test
GPU measurements while running our The Witcher 3 test
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 304.3 271.6 248.7 136.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 258.9 163.9 102.6 53.3
For Honor (2017) 237.2 128.6 121.5 93.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 120.9 79.9 57.2
Far Cry 5 (2018) 119 93 88 83
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 109 90 86 78
Anno 1800 (2019) 94.6 89.6 69.2 39.6
Rage 2 (2019) 175.1 83.3 69.9 68.8
F1 2019 (2019) 181 144 122 92

Barulho

Ocioso
30 / 32 / 35 dB
Carga
47 / 51 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Dell G7 17 7790
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
4%
10%
-5%
2%
12%
11%
off / environment *
30
29
3%
28.2
6%
29
3%
30.5
-2%
28
7%
Idle Minimum *
30
29
3%
28.6
5%
29
3%
32.1
-7%
28
7%
Idle Average *
32
32
-0%
28.6
11%
34
-6%
32.1
-0%
28
12%
Idle Maximum *
35
33
6%
28.6
18%
37
-6%
32.3
8%
31.3
11%
Load Average *
47
42
11%
31.8
32%
53
-13%
42.9
9%
33.4
29%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
49
-2%
50.6
-5%
51
-6%
42.8
11%
Load Maximum *
51
49
4%
50.8
-0%
55
-8%
48.8
4%
46.2
9%

* ... smaller is better

 47 °C47 °C44 °C 
 43 °C43 °C42 °C 
 32 °C35 °C34 °C 
Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 40.8 °C
46 °C47 °C50 °C
40 °C42 °C43 °C
33 °C33 °C30 °C
Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 40.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  55 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Dell G7 17 7790
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
3%
-6%
8%
18%
1%
2%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
47
-0%
46.6
1%
45
4%
35
26%
42
11%
Maximum Bottom *
50
56
-12%
57
-14%
42
16%
34.3
31%
51.2
-2%
Idle Upper Side *
34
28
18%
34.4
-1%
30
12%
30.1
11%
31.8
6%
Idle Bottom *
32
30
6%
34.6
-8%
32
-0%
30.5
5%
35.4
-11%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203539.52539.546.6313032.44032.236.25030.230.36328.131.28027.430.410027.130.11252638.116028.246.120024.844.225021.45331520.754.940020.154.950019.353.263018.864.580019.170.4100018.567.7125018.861160017.858.9200017.662250017.956.9315018.154.3400017.858.7500017.859630017.757.6800017.757.31000017.757.31250017.753.91600017.751.8SPL30.674.1N1.532.2median 18.5median 56.9Delta2.23.94345.436.739.929.431.834.140.527.23024.829.525.738.825.439.822.234.221.644.222.748.822.452.519.853.118.350.817.361.117.269.517.172.716.866.316.863.516.960.416.858.717.155.51751.216.95317.153.517.156.617.258.517.554.117.843.417.134.929.475.31.232.1median 17.2median 53.51.16.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Core 17SCHENKER XMG Core 15
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Core 15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.4 / 0.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 10 / 13 / 21 Watt
Carga midlight 89 / 177 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Dell G7 17 7790
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-17%
-11%
-11%
2%
24%
-36%
Idle Minimum *
10
13
-30%
9.5
5%
10
-0%
9.3
7%
6.3
37%
Idle Average *
13
16
-23%
16.2
-25%
15
-15%
14.8
-14%
11
15%
Idle Maximum *
21
21
-0%
23.8
-13%
22
-5%
22
-5%
11.5
45%
Load Average *
89
96
-8%
101.7
-14%
92
-3%
63
29%
89.8
-1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
128
172
-34%
155
-21%
153
-20%
102
20%
Load Maximum *
177
191
-8%
172.2
3%
216
-22%
187
-6%
130.7
26%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
8h 06min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44)
4h 39min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 16min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 20min
SCHENKER XMG Core 17
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 46.74 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 46.74 Wh
Dell G7 17 7790
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 60 Wh
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 51 Wh
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 62 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 76 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-29%
13%
-42%
2%
24%
19%
Reader / Idle
486
315
-35%
511
5%
286
-41%
411
-15%
789
62%
H.264
316
320
1%
WiFi v1.3
279
224
-20%
236
-15%
190
-32%
321
15%
402
44%
Load
80
55
-31%
119
49%
38
-52%
84
5%
52
-35%

Pro

+ Tela IPS mate
+ Painel de 144-Hz
+ Marcos finos da tela
+ Carcaça robusta
+ Peso moderado
+ SSD NVMe
+ 2 slots M.2-2280
+ Slot de 2,5-polegadas
+ Aquecimento moderado

Contra

- Barulhento sob uso intenso
- O som poderia ter sido melhor
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
The XMG Core 17, test unit provided by Schenker Technologies.
The XMG Core 17, test unit provided by Schenker Technologies.

Com o XMG Core 17, a Schenker oferece um portátil para jogos de 17,3 polegadas que é capaz de rodar todos os jogos de computador atuais fluentemente na tela Full HD mate, graças ao processador Core i7-8750H e núcleo gráfico GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. Você sempre pode selecionar configurações de qualidade de gráficos em altas a máximas. 

Também é positivo que, ao contrário de muitos outros portáteis para jogos, o Core 17 não se aqueça excessivamente sob uso intenso. Além disso, não produz muito ruído - pelo menos em operação inativa e sob cargas de trabalho leves. Particularmente durante a operação inativa, muitas vezes você não consegue ouvir os ventiladores. No entanto, sob carga, é uma história diferente.

O XMG Core 17 acaba por ser um portátil de jogos completo com um exterior despretensioso.

A tela IPS de 144 Hz pontua com tempos de resposta curtos, ângulos de visão estáveis, um bom contraste e uma ótima reprodução de cores. O brilho da tela está bom, mas poderia ter sido melhor para um portátil nessa faixa de preço. Também não devemos esquecer de mencionar os pequenos marcos da tela.

O portátil oferece espaço para dois SSDs NVMe no formato M.2-2280 que também podem ser configurados como uma matriz RAID (0 ou 1). Além disso, você também pode adicionar um disco rígido de 2,5 polegadas. As tarefas de atualização ou manutenção podem ser executadas sem problemas. Depois de remover a parte inferior da carcaça, você obtém acesso a todos os componentes.

A duração da bateria não vai empolgar ninguém, mas é bastante decente para um portátil de jogos. O teclado chiclet (iluminação RGB) provou ser adequado para tarefas diárias. A quantidade de conexões é bastante grande, mas sentimos falta de uma porta Thunderbolt-3.

SCHENKER XMG Core 17 - 07/16/2019 v6(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
82 / 98 → 83%
Teclado
87%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
62 / 81 → 77%
Peso
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Bateria
80%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
97%
Desempenho da aplicação
95%
Temperatura
85 / 95 → 90%
Ruído
73 / 90 → 81%
Audio
70%
Médio
80%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Core 17 (Core i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, Tela de 144-Hz) Tongfang GK7CP6R
Sascha Mölck, 2019-07-19 (Update: 2019-07-19)