Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (8250U, MX110)

J. Simon Leitner, 👁 J. Simon Leitner, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/20/2018

Exotic. A Xiaomi construiu agora uma orgulhosa seleção de portáteis junto com seus smartphones Mi.... Nosso foco para esta análise é o Mi Notebook 15,6, que não possui os termos Pro, Air ou Gaming dos outros portáteis do fabricante chinês. O Notebook 15,6 é o dispositivo mais barato e básico da empresa, mas geralmente não está disponível no mundo ocidental, exceto por algumas lojas que oferecem o portátil. Leia mais para ver como o Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15,6 com seu processador Intel Core i5 se sai em nossa análise detalhada.

Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 - 2048 MB, Análises do: 978 MHz, Memoría: 5010 MHz, GDDR5, 397.97, Optimus
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4 SDRAM
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE07C5 (NV156FHM-N42), LED, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ, 128 GB 
, + WDC WD10SPZX-22Z10T1
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD Cardreader
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 21 x 382 x 253
Bateria
40 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: Webcam HD de 1.280 x 720
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: AKG Speaker, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não
peso
2.189 kg, Suprimento de energia: 370 g
Preço
769 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Left-hand side: RJ45 Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0 Type-A x2, headphone jack
Left-hand side: RJ45 Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0 Type-A x2, headphone jack
Right-hand side: USB 2.0 Type-A, SD card reader
Right-hand side: USB 2.0 Type-A, SD card reader
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼100% +239%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.4 MB/s ∼88% +197%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M510 microSD)
76 MB/s ∼87% +196%
Average of class Office
  (10.2 - 191, n=229)
61.2 MB/s ∼70% +138%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
35.2 MB/s ∼40% +37%
HP 15-da0405ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33.7 MB/s ∼39% +31%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32.6 MB/s ∼37% +27%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
29.7 MB/s ∼34% +16%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25.7 MB/s ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
 
21.4 MB/s ∼25% -17%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.7 MB/s ∼100% +216%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M510 microSD)
85.6 MB/s ∼100% +216%
Average of class Office
  (9.5 - 255, n=206)
78.7 MB/s ∼92% +190%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.2 MB/s ∼43% +37%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.1 MB/s ∼32%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
24.2 MB/s ∼28% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
 
17.4 MB/s ∼20% -36%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
585 MBit/s ∼100% +110%
Dell Latitude 15 3590-K8JP
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
568 MBit/s ∼97% +104%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
513 MBit/s ∼88% +84%
Average of class Office
  (5 - 688, n=170)
462 MBit/s ∼79% +66%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Qualcomm/Atheros QCA6174
424 MBit/s ∼72% +52%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
345 MBit/s ∼59% +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
326 MBit/s ∼56% +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
305 MBit/s ∼52% +9%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
290 MBit/s ∼50% +4%
HP 15-da0405ng
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
285 MBit/s ∼49% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
279 (min: 140, max: 285) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
620 MBit/s ∼100% +87%
Dell Latitude 15 3590-K8JP
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
555 MBit/s ∼90% +68%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
471 MBit/s ∼76% +42%
Average of class Office
  (34 - 688, n=170)
427 MBit/s ∼69% +29%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
347 MBit/s ∼56% +5%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
340 MBit/s ∼55% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
331 (min: 290, max: 376) MBit/s ∼53%
HP 15-da0405ng
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
323 MBit/s ∼52% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
315 MBit/s ∼51% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
299 MBit/s ∼48% -10%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Qualcomm/Atheros QCA6174
219 MBit/s ∼35% -34%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø279 (274-285)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø331 (290-376)
288
cd/m²
268
cd/m²
267
cd/m²
264
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
245
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 288 cd/m² Médio: 267.3 cd/m² Minimum: 15.11 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 280 cd/m²
Contraste: 1400:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 3.6
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
63.6% sRGB (Calman 2D) 59.26% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 38.09% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
BOE07C5 (NV156FHM-N42), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
BOE0747 NV156FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE0747), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2018
SHARP LQ133M1JW15, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
Chi Mei (CMN15D5), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
BOE NV156FHM-N49, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
BOE0700, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
Chi Mei N156HGA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 15.6
HP 15-da0405ng
BOE0687, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
Chi Mei CMN15D3, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
12077%
11926%
98%
14416%
12200%
47749%
13869%
16102%
13862%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
46 (22.4, 23.6)
47.9 (22.4, 25.5)
-4%
53.2 (26.4, 26.8)
-16%
39.6 (18.4, 21.2)
14%
43.3 (22, 21.3)
6%
48.4 (25.6, 22.8)
-5%
44 (21, 23)
4%
40 (22, 18)
13%
41 (22, 19)
11%
40 (23, 17)
13%
Response Time Black / White *
34 (15.2, 18.8)
33.7 (19.2, 14.5)
1%
41.6 (23.6, 18)
-22%
29.3 (14.8, 14.5)
14%
13.8 (9.5, 4.3)
59%
37.6 (21.2, 16.4)
-11%
31 (17, 14)
9%
25 (20, 5)
26%
13 (8, 5)
62%
32 (13, 10)
6%
PWM Frequency
60 (100)
21800 (99)
36233%
21550 (99)
35817%
220 (18, 100)
267%
25970 (19)
43183%
22030 (99)
36617%
86000 (90)
143233%
25000 (20)
41567%
29000 (90)
48233%
25000 (10)
41567%
Screen
4%
8%
-7%
-103%
-24%
-21%
-70%
-65%
9%
Brightness middle
280
296
6%
283
1%
370
32%
246
-12%
292
4%
283
1%
185
-34%
176
-37%
259
-7%
Brightness
267
288
8%
269
1%
355
33%
225
-16%
272
2%
252
-6%
166
-38%
164
-39%
230
-14%
Brightness Distribution
85
89
5%
87
2%
90
6%
81
-5%
84
-1%
75
-12%
76
-11%
69
-19%
82
-4%
Black Level *
0.2
0.32
-60%
0.23
-15%
0.23
-15%
0.51
-155%
0.3
-50%
0.63
-215%
0.37
-85%
0.31
-55%
0.19
5%
Contrast
1400
925
-34%
1230
-12%
1609
15%
482
-66%
973
-30%
449
-68%
500
-64%
568
-59%
1363
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5
4.3
14%
4.68
6%
6.9
-38%
11
-120%
5.8
-16%
4.02
20%
11.26
-125%
11.4
-128%
3.13
37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.9
8.7
-10%
8
-1%
12.2
-54%
32.4
-310%
22.4
-184%
8.77
-11%
18.65
-136%
19.76
-150%
7.81
1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.6
2.5
31%
1.4
61%
4.6
-28%
4.03
-12%
2.99
17%
3.09
14%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.7
3
19%
4.32
-17%
7.4
-100%
11.6
-214%
2.3
38%
0.8
78%
11.56
-212%
12.75
-245%
1.42
62%
Gamma
2.08 106%
2.1 105%
2.36 93%
1.76 125%
1.91 115%
2.12 104%
2.35 94%
2.1 105%
2.59 85%
2.36 93%
CCT
7309 89%
7100 92%
7612 85%
7529 86%
11807 55%
6223 104%
6552 99%
11788 55%
14899 44%
6391 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38.09
56.83
49%
57
50%
37.6
-1%
38
0%
38
0%
38
0%
40
5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59.26
86.86
47%
87
47%
58
-2%
58
-2%
60
1%
59
0%
63
6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6041% / 2790%
5967% / 2562%
46% / 20%
7157% / 3527%
6088% / 2797%
23864% / 10216%
6900% / 3146%
8019% / 3399%
6936% / 2978%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.2 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.4 ms rise
↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8773 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

HWInfo
HWInfo
Nvidia GeForce MX110 hardware information
Nvidia GeForce MX110 hardware information
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø625 (620.97-665.25)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø493 (481.04-518.17)
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U: Ø428 (403.66-613.02)
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø500 (432.57-532.94)
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø506 (502.7-553.14)
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø548 (544.28-575.47)
Dell Latitude 15 3590-K8JP Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø537 (500.56-587.96)
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø481 (476.32-517.64)
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø461 (452.07-488.22)
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA Intel Core i3-8130U, Intel Core i3-8130U: Ø335 (332.21-338.59)
HP 15-da0405ng Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø519 (513.66-568.03)
Asus VivoBook 15 X510UQ-BQ534T Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø638 (617.09-720.56)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 (min: 144.66, max: 144.78) Points ∼100% +2%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 Points ∼100% +2%
HP 15-da0405ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼99% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼99% +1%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
Intel Core i5-8250U
142 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
Intel Core i5-8250U
142 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (81 - 147, n=84)
141 Points ∼97% -1%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
Intel Core i3-8130U
140 Points ∼97% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
Intel Core i5-8250U
140 Points ∼97% -1%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
138 Points ∼95% -3%
Asus VivoBook 15 X510UQ-BQ534T
Intel Core i5-8250U
136 Points ∼94% -4%
Average of class Office
  (20 - 178, n=475)
108 Points ∼74% -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus VivoBook 15 X510UQ-BQ534T
Intel Core i5-8250U
720 Points ∼100% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
Intel Core i5-8250U
665 Points ∼92%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
613 Points ∼85% -8%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
576 (min: 544.28, max: 575.47) Points ∼80% -13%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (320 - 730, n=87)
569 Points ∼79% -14%
HP 15-da0405ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
568 Points ∼79% -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
Intel Core i5-8250U
553 Points ∼77% -17%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
Intel Core i5-8250U
518 Points ∼72% -22%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
Intel Core i5-8250U
504.475 (min: 432.57, max: 532.94) Points ∼70% -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
Intel Core i5-8250U
480 Points ∼67% -28%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
Intel Core i3-8130U
338 Points ∼47% -49%
Average of class Office
  (36 - 1050, n=479)
316 Points ∼44% -52%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
58.76 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
665 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
142 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3686 Points ∼100% +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
3609 Points ∼98% +13%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Radeon RX 540, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
3324 Points ∼90% +4%
HP 15-da0405ng
GeForce MX110, 8250U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
3260 Points ∼88% +2%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
UHD Graphics 620, 8130U, Kingston RBUSNS8180S3128GI1
3230 Points ∼88% +1%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (3194 - 3260, n=2)
3227 Points ∼88% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
GeForce MX110, 8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
3194 Points ∼87%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
GeForce MX130, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3175 Points ∼86% -1%
Average of class Office
  (803 - 4269, n=95)
3120 Points ∼85% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
2449 Points ∼66% -23%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4901 Points ∼100% +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
4783 Points ∼98% +5%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
GeForce MX130, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4775 Points ∼97% +5%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
GeForce MX130, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4769 Points ∼97% +5%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Radeon RX 540, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
4749 Points ∼97% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4746 Points ∼97% +4%
HP 15-da0405ng
GeForce MX110, 8250U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
4728 Points ∼96% +4%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (4544 - 4728, n=2)
4636 Points ∼95% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
GeForce MX110, 8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
4544 Points ∼93%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
UHD Graphics 620, 8130U, Kingston RBUSNS8180S3128GI1
4534 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Office
  (1226 - 5428, n=301)
3947 Points ∼81% -13%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
GeForce MX130, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3903 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3766 Points ∼96% +19%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Radeon RX 540, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
3741 Points ∼96% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
3729 Points ∼96% +18%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
3621 Points ∼93% +15%
HP 15-da0405ng
GeForce MX110, 8250U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
3478 Points ∼89% +10%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
GeForce MX130, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3461 Points ∼89% +10%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (3153 - 3478, n=2)
3316 Points ∼85% +5%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
UHD Graphics 620, 8130U, Kingston RBUSNS8180S3128GI1
3302 Points ∼85% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
GeForce MX110, 8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
3153 Points ∼81%
Average of class Office
  (1169 - 4458, n=352)
3007 Points ∼77% -5%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3153 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4544 pontos
Ajuda
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
 
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
Kingston RBUSNS8180S3128GI1
HP 15-da0405ng
SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
Average Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-0%
67%
-9%
1%
129%
170%
6%
74%
3%
Write 4K
77.25
80.93
5%
112
45%
71.76
-7%
81.76
6%
150
94%
785.05
916%
101.4
31%
97.56
26%
81.5 (61 - 121, n=6)
6%
Read 4K
29.77
28.23
-5%
32.44
9%
21.23
-29%
33.33
12%
36
21%
140
370%
26.75
-10%
39.08
31%
32.9 (29.8 - 35.5, n=6)
11%
Write Seq
442.5
266.3
-40%
597.9
35%
257.1
-42%
131.1
-70%
1057
139%
158.1
-64%
383
-13%
571.2
29%
389 (164 - 469, n=6)
-12%
Read Seq
442.7
495.5
12%
1157
161%
476.3
8%
909.9
106%
1074
143%
892.2
102%
432.4
-2%
1110
151%
498 (443 - 519, n=6)
12%
Write 4K Q32T1
173.8
255
47%
255.5
47%
202.6
17%
122.1
-30%
429
147%
162.2
-7%
292.1
68%
235.7
36%
196 (147 - 325, n=6)
13%
Read 4K Q32T1
233.6
288.3
23%
287.5
23%
282
21%
199.3
-15%
441
89%
320.4
37%
225.1
-4%
297
27%
305 (180 - 517, n=6)
31%
Write Seq Q32T1
510.3
265.6
-48%
594.3
16%
265.6
-48%
133
-74%
1283
151%
160.2
-69%
382.8
-25%
812.1
59%
374 (146 - 522, n=6)
-27%
Read Seq Q32T1
529.6
555.5
5%
1568
196%
559.4
6%
934.5
76%
1838
247%
932.6
76%
526.2
-1%
1742
229%
483 (208 - 547, n=6)
-9%
Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 529.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 510.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 233.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 173.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 442.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 442.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 29.77 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 77.25 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
AMD Radeon RX 540, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
4646 Points ∼100% +117%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U
4252 Points ∼92% +99%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U
2882 Points ∼62% +35%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U
2786 Points ∼60% +30%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U
2140 Points ∼46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (2121 - 2140, n=2)
2131 Points ∼46% 0%
HP 15-da0405ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U
2121 Points ∼46% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1805 Points ∼39% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1629 Points ∼35% -24%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8130U
1366 Points ∼29% -36%
Average of class Office
  (185 - 4967, n=600)
1218 Points ∼26% -43%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
AMD Radeon RX 540, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
3519 Points ∼100% +104%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U
3263 Points ∼93% +89%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U
2311 Points ∼66% +34%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U
2310 Points ∼66% +34%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U
1722 Points ∼49%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (1714 - 1722, n=2)
1718 Points ∼49% 0%
HP 15-da0405ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U
1714 Points ∼49% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
938 Points ∼27% -46%
Average of class Office
  (138 - 4109, n=428)
937 Points ∼27% -46%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8130U
819 Points ∼23% -52%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
557 Points ∼16% -68%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
AMD Radeon RX 540, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
23263 Points ∼100% +106%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U
17552 Points ∼75% +55%
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U
13246 Points ∼57% +17%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i5-8250U
12654 Points ∼54% +12%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U
11314 Points ∼49%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (10858 - 11314, n=2)
11086 Points ∼48% -2%
HP 15-da0405ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U
10858 Points ∼47% -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
10069 Points ∼43% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
7532 Points ∼32% -33%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8130U
6911 Points ∼30% -39%
Average of class Office
  (1208 - 27117, n=472)
6545 Points ∼28% -42%
3DMark 11 Performance
2400 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
10015 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1647 pontos
Ajuda
FIFA 18
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
72.3 fps ∼100% +52%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
GeForce MX110, 8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
47.5 fps ∼66%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (43.5 - 47.5, n=2)
45.5 fps ∼63% -4%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
GeForce MX130, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
43.6 (min: 33, max: 47) fps ∼60% -8%
HP 15-da0405ng
GeForce MX110, 8250U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
43.5 fps ∼60% -8%
Average of class Office
  (24.8 - 73, n=9)
41.5 fps ∼57% -13%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Radeon RX 540, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
40 fps ∼55% -16%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:2xMS
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
73.2 fps ∼100% +47%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
GeForce MX130, 8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
54.1 (min: 39, max: 59) fps ∼74% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
GeForce MX110, 8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
49.9 fps ∼68%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (49.2 - 49.9, n=2)
49.6 fps ∼68% -1%
HP 15-da0405ng
GeForce MX110, 8250U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
49.2 fps ∼67% -1%
Average of class Office
  (27.4 - 78.1, n=11)
42.8 fps ∼58% -14%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Radeon RX 540, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
40.2 fps ∼55% -19%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
GeForce MX110, 8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
62.4 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (56.2 - 62.4, n=2)
59.3 fps ∼95% -5%
HP 15-da0405ng
GeForce MX110, 8250U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
56.2 fps ∼90% -10%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Radeon RX 540, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
54.8 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Office
  (19.4 - 83.6, n=14)
45.3 fps ∼73% -27%
1280x720 Low Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
135.6 fps ∼100% +20%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Radeon RX 540, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
115.8 fps ∼85% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
GeForce MX110, 8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
112.9 fps ∼83%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (100 - 113, n=2)
107 fps ∼79% -5%
HP 15-da0405ng
GeForce MX110, 8250U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
100.1 fps ∼74% -11%
Average of class Office
  (35.1 - 134, n=15)
83.1 fps ∼61% -26%
Overwatch
1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
29.8 fps ∼100% +92%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Radeon RX 540, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
18.3 fps ∼61% +18%
HP 15-da0405ng
GeForce MX110, 8250U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
15.8 fps ∼53% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (15.5 - 15.8, n=2)
15.7 fps ∼53% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
GeForce MX110, 8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
15.5 fps ∼52%
Average of class Office
  (11.6 - 15.8, n=5)
14.6 fps ∼49% -6%
1920x1080 High (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:4x
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
46 fps ∼100% +64%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Radeon RX 540, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
32 fps ∼70% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
GeForce MX110, 8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
28.1 fps ∼61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (27.9 - 28.1, n=2)
28 fps ∼61% 0%
HP 15-da0405ng
GeForce MX110, 8250U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
27.9 fps ∼61% -1%
Average of class Office
  (14.6 - 28.1, n=9)
22 fps ∼48% -22%
1366x768 Medium (Render Scale 100 %) AA:FX AF:2x
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
97.2 fps ∼100% +43%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
GeForce MX110, 8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
67.9 fps ∼70%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (60.4 - 67.9, n=2)
64.2 fps ∼66% -5%
HP 15-da0405ng
GeForce MX110, 8250U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
60.4 fps ∼62% -11%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Radeon RX 540, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
50.9 fps ∼52% -25%
Average of class Office
  (9.7 - 67.9, n=14)
35.4 fps ∼36% -48%
1280x720 Low (Render Scale 100 %) AA:FX AF:1x
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
141.8 fps ∼100% +55%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
GeForce MX110, 8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
91.3 fps ∼64%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (87 - 91.3, n=2)
89.2 fps ∼63% -2%
HP 15-da0405ng
GeForce MX110, 8250U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
87 fps ∼61% -5%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Radeon RX 540, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
83.6 fps ∼59% -8%
Average of class Office
  (15.1 - 91.3, n=15)
47.8 fps ∼34% -48%
Fortnite
1920x1080 Epic Preset
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
81.4 fps ∼100% +536%
Honor Magicbook
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
24.1 fps ∼30% +88%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
16.2 fps ∼20% +27%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
GeForce MX110, 8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
12.8 fps ∼16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (11.5 - 12.8, n=2)
12.2 fps ∼15% -5%
Average of class Office
  (11.4 - 12.8, n=3)
11.9 fps ∼15% -7%
HP 15-da0405ng
GeForce MX110, 8250U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
11.5 fps ∼14% -10%
Honor Magicbook
Vega 8, 2500U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
10.9 fps ∼13% -15%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Radeon RX 540, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
9.4 fps ∼12% -27%
1920x1080 High Preset
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
91.5 fps ∼100% +429%
Honor Magicbook
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
36.1 fps ∼39% +109%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
22.1 fps ∼24% +28%
Honor Magicbook
Vega 8, 2500U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
19.1 fps ∼21% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
GeForce MX110, 8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
17.3 fps ∼19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (14.1 - 17.3, n=2)
15.7 fps ∼17% -9%
Average of class Office
  (14.1 - 17.3, n=3)
15.3 fps ∼17% -12%
HP 15-da0405ng
GeForce MX110, 8250U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
14.1 fps ∼15% -18%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Radeon RX 540, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
13.3 fps ∼15% -23%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Honor Magicbook
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
58.9 fps ∼100% +99%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
33.7 fps ∼57% +14%
Honor Magicbook
Vega 8, 2500U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
30.1 fps ∼51% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
GeForce MX110, 8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
29.6 fps ∼50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (19.9 - 29.6, n=2)
24.8 fps ∼42% -16%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Radeon RX 540, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
22.1 fps ∼38% -25%
HP 15-da0405ng
GeForce MX110, 8250U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
19.9 fps ∼34% -33%
Average of class Office
  (7.1 - 29.6, n=9)
15.3 fps ∼26% -48%
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE
HD Graphics 620, 7200U
13.7 fps ∼23% -54%
1280x720 Low Preset
Honor Magicbook
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
113.2 fps ∼100% +75%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
Radeon RX 540, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
89.2 fps ∼79% +38%
HP 15-da0405ng
GeForce MX110, 8250U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
66.1 fps ∼58% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110
  (64.7 - 66.1, n=2)
65.4 fps ∼58% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
GeForce MX110, 8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
64.7 fps ∼57%
Honor Magicbook
Vega 8, 2500U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
63.6 fps ∼56% -2%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
61.7 fps ∼55% -5%
Average of class Office
  (16.2 - 76.7, n=12)
42.2 fps ∼37% -35%
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE
HD Graphics 620, 7200U
41 fps ∼36% -37%
baixo média alto ultra
Overwatch (2016) 91.367.928.115.5fps
FIFA 18 (2017) 112.962.449.947.5fps
Fortnite (2018) 64.729.617.312.8fps

Barulho

Ocioso
29.9 / 30.6 / 35 dB
HDD
30.6 dB
Carga
38.8 / 45.3 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29.9 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.742.441.7412530.530.630.429.83131.328.731.229.84030.43029.533.2502831.529.630.46328.531.327.628.68027.828.326.229.210027.227.726.126.512525.224.624.625.116024.423.724.823.720024.522.923.524.725024.222.222.623.631524.321.120.822.440024.420.42123.5500252019.523.363025.719.318.524.580029.120.617.927100030.220.117.426.11250311917.527.5160030.318.117.425.4200027.417.717.423250028.717.417.321.7315022.817.617.220.7400020.717.317.119.1500018.5171717.6630017.717.217.217.3800017.517.317.317.41000017.517.317.317.41250017.217.117.217.41600017.317.317.217.5SPL3545.338.838.730.629.935.3N2.15.12.82.71.51.42.2median 24.4median 19median 17.4median 23.3Delta3.42.61.83.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseXiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
Carga Máxima
 46.1 °C48.2 °C38.2 °C 
 38.8 °C41.2 °C34.7 °C 
 26.2 °C27.4 °C27.2 °C 
Máximo: 48.2 °C
Médio: 36.4 °C
47.6 °C58.8 °C51.7 °C
31.4 °C50 °C42.5 °C
26.4 °C26.8 °C25.1 °C
Máximo: 58.8 °C
Médio: 40 °C
alimentação elétrica  53.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.2 °C | Raytek Raynger ST
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 58.8 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F, ranging from 22.3 to 71.6 °C for the class Office.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.436.52530.930.7313230.3403229503130.36329.328.28027.527.210029.127.212536.725.216047.824.820054.623.925057.222.431557.721.640057.520.850054.419.563054.319.280064.220.6100066.320.412506918.5160068.218.1200067.418.2250064.317.7315066.817.6400059.517.5500055.217.1630057.217.2800060.617.31000058.717.31250051.917.21600046.417.3SPL76.630.7N36.81.5median 57.5median 18.5Delta5.12.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5.6 / 8.6 / 8.7 Watt
Carga midlight 39.9 / 59.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
8250U, GeForce MX110, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ, LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
8250U, GeForce MX130, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
2500U, Radeon RX 540, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
8250U, GeForce MX130, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Latitude 15 3590-K8JP
8550U, Radeon 530, Toshiba MQ01ACF050, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
8130U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8180S3128GI1, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP 15-da0405ng
8250U, GeForce MX110, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110
 
Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
-6%
-19%
9%
24%
-2%
-29%
21%
15%
14%
7%
-21%
Idle Minimum *
5.6
5.1
9%
6.9
-23%
3.3
41%
3.4
39%
3.7
34%
8.2
-46%
5
11%
5.4
4%
3.8
32%
4.7 (3.8 - 5.6, n=2)
16%
7.8 (0.77 - 32, n=909)
-39%
Idle Average *
8.6
7.6
12%
9.6
-12%
5.6
35%
6.7
22%
7.5
13%
8.4
2%
7.6
12%
8.2
5%
6.2
28%
7.4 (6.2 - 8.6, n=2)
14%
11.6 (4.2 - 42, n=909)
-35%
Idle Maximum *
8.7
8.2
6%
11.8
-36%
7.8
10%
7.7
11%
8
8%
8.4
3%
8.6
1%
8.4
3%
6.7
23%
7.7 (6.7 - 8.7, n=2)
11%
14.1 (5 - 67, n=909)
-62%
Load Average *
39.9
49.4
-24%
50
-25%
54
-35%
31.1
22%
49
-23%
62.6
-57%
25.6
36%
32.2
19%
40.8
-2%
40.4 (39.9 - 40.8, n=2)
-1%
37.3 (7.43 - 99.3, n=894)
7%
Load Maximum *
59.9
68
-14%
60
-0%
63
-5%
42.9
28%
55.2
8%
66.8
-12%
34
43%
32.6
46%
65.2
-9%
62.6 (59.9 - 65.2, n=2)
-5%
45.8 (12.2 - 129, n=896)
24%
Witcher 3 ultra *
33.2
42.1
-27%
50.6
-52%
53.6
-61%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
10h 13min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 45min
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)
8250U, GeForce MX110, 40 Wh
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A
8250U, GeForce MX130, 48 Wh
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR
2500U, Radeon RX 540, 48 Wh
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE
8250U, GeForce MX130, 48 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
8250U, GeForce MX150, 60 Wh
Dell Latitude 15 3590-K8JP
8550U, Radeon 530, 56 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
8130U, UHD Graphics 620, 37 Wh
HP 15-da0405ng
8250U, GeForce MX110, 41 Wh
Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
19%
5%
30%
20%
56%
30%
13%
-17%
4%
-0%
Reader / Idle
613
867
41%
724
18%
864
41%
857
40%
754
23%
557 (101 - 1857, n=768)
-9%
H.264
465
525
13%
366
-21%
516
11%
435
-6%
632
36%
412 (139 - 791, n=148)
-11%
WiFi v1.3
340
350
3%
401
18%
505
49%
421
24%
597
76%
408
20%
350
3%
281
-17%
355
4%
405 (105 - 964, n=292)
19%
Load
162
109
118
96
122
114
113
101 (37 - 259, n=713)
Witcher 3 ultra
83

Pro

+ Design simples com linhas simples
+ Bom posicionamento das portas
+ Manutenção fácil graças à placa inferior removível
+ Dispositivos de entrada impressionantes
+ Tela de alto contraste com acabamento mate
+ Desempenho potente do Core i5-8250U
+ O dispositivo é geralmente silencioso no uso diário

Contra

- Windows 10 em chinês por padrão
- Garantia chinesa
- Lento leitor de cartões
- Velocidades médias do Wi-Fi
- Layout QWERTY do teclado
- Baixa cobertura do espaço de cores
- Cintilação de tela detectada a 60 Hz
- O dispositivo pode esquentar sob uso intenso
The Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 review.
The Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 review.

É difícil obter um veredicto adequado sobre o Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15,6. Crucialmente, o dispositivo está atualmente indisponível no mundo ocidental, o que gera numerosos problemas relacionados à garantia caso o dispositivo apresente uma falha. Além disso, o dispositivo só vem com uma versão chinesa do Windows 10, que requer algumas alterações demoradas, a menos que você saiba chinês. Esses fatores por si só podem afastar as pessoas que não querem nenhum problema associado ao seu portátil.

O dispositivo em si é de excelente valor pelo dinheiro. O Mi Notebook 15.6 é feito em grande parte de plástico, mas tem um bom acabamento e mantém a estética de design minimalista da Xiaomi. O teclado e o trackpad também são excepcionais para um dispositivo de menos de 600 euros (~$ 690).

Por outro lado, as impressões tela são confusas. O brilho é bom o suficiente para a maioria dos usos, enquanto o acabamento mate e a alta taxa de contraste são bônus bem-vindos. No entanto, a tela tem uma precisão de cores e uma cobertura de espaço de cores comparativamente ruim.

O Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 é caracterizado por sua atraente relação preço-desempenho. Sua disponibilidade atual somente na China limitará o sucesso do dispositivo na Europa e nos EUA.

Um destaque do Mi Notebook 15.6 é o quão bem ele funciona. O Core i5-8250U oferece um desempenho excepcional sob uso intenso contínuo, e o MX110 oferece taxas de quadros reproduzíveis em jogos modernos, apesar de ser uma GPU para portáteis de nível de entrada da Nvidia..

Nosso dispositivo de teste também funciona de forma silenciosa, mas os ventiladores ficam altos quando o sistema é estressado. Igualmente, a Xiaomi se concentrou em manter o desempenho máximo às custas de altas temperaturas.

No geral, o Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 é um ótimo dispositivo para o dinheiro e um que oferece muito mais do que outros portáteis de preço equivalente. Você pode economizar cerca de 200 Euros (~$230) comprando o Mi Notebook 15.6, em comparação com outros dispositivos disponíveis no mundo todo, mas os riscos de garantia associados à importação de um dispositivo da China podem ser grandes obstáculos para algumas pessoas.

Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) - 10/12/2018 v6
J. Simon Leitner

Acabamento
71 / 98 → 73%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
44 / 80 → 55%
Peso
62 / 20-67 → 89%
Bateria
88%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
67 / 68 → 98%
Desempenho da aplicação
82 / 92 → 90%
Temperatura
87%
Ruído
83%
Audio
60%
Médio
75%
82%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (8250U, MX110)
J. Simon Leitner, 2018-10-20 (Update: 2018-10-23)