Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB (i7-8550U, MX150, WQHD, IPS)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.9 - 193.9, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23.6 - 239, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 310 cd/m²
Contraste: 1555:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.6
ΔE Greyscale 8.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
| Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB AUO B140QAN02.3, 2560x1440, 14.00 | HP Spectre 13-af033ng AU Optronics AUO422D, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Tianma XM, 3000x2000, 13.90 | Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY AU Optronics AUO203D, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T Chi Mei CMN14D2 / N140HCE-EN1, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE N140HCA-EAC, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | 1% | 5% | 1% | -36% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.5 | 64 -2% | 65.9 1% | 69.7 6% | 65.6 0% | 41.58 -37% |
| sRGB Coverage | 96.2 | 90.7 -6% | 95.2 -1% | 97.1 1% | 97.4 1% | 61.8 -36% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.1 | 65.1 -2% | 67.6 2% | 71 7% | 67.8 3% | 43.05 -35% |
| Response Times | 39% | 25% | 32% | 35% | 25% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 58.4 ? | 27 ? 54% | 40.4 ? 31% | 37 ? 37% | 30 ? 49% | 38 ? 35% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 31.2 ? | 24 ? 23% | 25.6 ? 18% | 23 ? 26% | 25 ? 20% | 26.4 ? 15% |
| PWM Frequency | 24510 ? | |||||
| Screen | 12% | 13% | -9% | -10% | -10% | |
| Brightness middle | 311 | 304 -2% | 442.7 42% | 254 -18% | 377 21% | 274 -12% |
| Brightness | 293 | 287 -2% | 428 46% | 231 -21% | 339 16% | 256 -13% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 80 -6% | 84 -1% | 86 1% | 76 -11% | 83 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.21 -5% | 0.31 -55% | 0.25 -25% | 0.4 -100% | 0.18 10% |
| Contrast | 1555 | 1448 -7% | 1428 -8% | 1016 -35% | 943 -39% | 1522 -2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6 | 3.66 39% | 2.24 63% | 3.85 36% | 3.33 44% | 6.7 -12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.6 | 5.66 51% | 7.19 38% | 7.05 39% | 8.02 31% | 14.8 -28% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.6 | 1.11 31% | 3.66 -129% | 3.5 -119% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.7 | 3.51 60% | 9.7 -11% | 4.1 53% | 4.89 44% | 6.3 28% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.55 86% | 1.42 155% | 2.43 91% | 2.37 93% | 2.04 108% |
| CCT | 8426 77% | 6955 93% | 6227 104% | 7369 88% | 7620 85% | 6363 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60.9 | 59 -3% | 61.6 1% | 63 3% | 62 2% | 39.6 -35% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96 | 91 -5% | 95 -1% | 97 1% | 98 2% | 61.5 -36% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 16% /
12% | 13% /
12% | 9% /
-1% | 9% /
-2% | -7% /
-11% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 58.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 29.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 29.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11845 - 82102, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (6737 - 8436, n=12) | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13726 - 70566, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (12279 - 31667, n=12) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3463 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4643 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4648 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3421 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | HP Spectre 13-af033ng Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE Ramaxel RTNTE256PCA8EADL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 23% | -19% | -40% | -41% | |
| Read Seq | 1360 | 907 -33% | 1113 -18% | 480.3 -65% | 472.3 -65% |
| Write Seq | 733 | 878 20% | 597 -19% | 263.9 -64% | 254.1 -65% |
| Read 512 | 769 | 515 -33% | 642 -17% | 266.9 -65% | 347.8 -55% |
| Write 512 | 642 | 546 -15% | 472.8 -26% | 263.2 -59% | 252.8 -61% |
| Read 4k | 39.83 | 60 51% | 29.58 -26% | 29.58 -26% | 24.74 -38% |
| Write 4k | 100 | 144 44% | 89.2 -11% | 68.4 -32% | 77.7 -22% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 330.3 | 543 64% | 289.5 -12% | 322.2 -2% | 279.6 -15% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 260.2 | 476 83% | 203.3 -22% | 243.3 -6% | 244.8 -6% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4074 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 39095 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 11890 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2925 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1455 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1005 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 165.2 | 98.1 | 82.5 | 31.4 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 41.6 | 35.4 | 19.3 | 16.4 |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 34 | 17 | 15 | 13 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.7 / 31.1 / 33.1 dB |
| Carga |
| 40 / 40 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.7 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | HP Spectre 13-af033ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, Ramaxel RTNTE256PCA8EADL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 8% | 3% | 6% | 2% | 6% | |
| off / environment * | 29.7 | 30.13 -1% | 27.9 6% | 30.3 -2% | 30 -1% | 29.9 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.7 | 30.13 -1% | 27.9 6% | 30.3 -2% | 30 -1% | 29.9 -1% |
| Idle Average * | 31.1 | 30.13 3% | 27.9 10% | 30.3 3% | 30 4% | 29.9 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.1 | 30.13 9% | 27.9 16% | 31.2 6% | 33.1 -0% | 30.7 7% |
| Load Average * | 40 | 31.5 21% | 36.2 9% | 33.1 17% | 37.6 6% | 35.1 12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40 | 45 -13% | 35.1 12% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 40 | 33.5 16% | 45.2 -13% | 34.4 14% | 37.6 6% | 36.2 9% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.3 °C / 0.5 F).
| Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | HP Spectre 13-af033ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, Ramaxel RTNTE256PCA8EADL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -14% | -15% | -8% | -14% | -12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 40.5 | 41.2 -2% | 48.6 -20% | 42.9 -6% | 44.6 -10% | 49.3 -22% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 46.5 | 44.2 5% | 47 -1% | 44.9 3% | 46.8 -1% | 53.9 -16% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 24.9 | 32.1 -29% | 28.6 -15% | 28.4 -14% | 30.4 -22% | 26.7 -7% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25 | 32.8 -31% | 30.8 -23% | 28.5 -14% | 30.4 -22% | 25.9 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Spectre 13-af033ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.33 / 0.42 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.9 / 5.76 / 7.14 Watt |
| Carga |
50.8 / 65.8 Watt |
   
| |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00 | HP Spectre 13-af033ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.90 | Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, Ramaxel RTNTE256PCA8EADL, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 14% | -21% | 36% | -11% | 9% | -19% | -21% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 2.8 28% | 3.5 10% | 2.8 28% | 4.5 -15% | 3.37 14% | 4.48 ? -15% | 4.9 ? -26% |
| Idle Average * | 5.76 | 6.2 -8% | 8.9 -55% | 4.8 17% | 7.8 -35% | 5.2 10% | 7.88 ? -37% | 8.36 ? -45% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.14 | 9.4 -32% | 12.3 -72% | 6.3 12% | 8.1 -13% | 7.1 1% | 9.76 ? -37% | 10.4 ? -46% |
| Load Average * | 50.8 | 32.2 37% | 54.2 -7% | 21 59% | 52 -2% | 46.2 9% | 54.7 ? -8% | 45.9 ? 10% |
| Load Maximum * | 65.8 | 36.6 44% | 52.1 21% | 23 65% | 59 10% | 57 13% | 63.5 ? 3% | 66 ? -0% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.4 | 38.5 |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 45 Wh | HP Spectre 13-af033ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 43 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 36 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 48 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 520s-14IKB 80X200C1GE i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 52.5 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 14% | 35% | 14% | 23% | 24% | 46% | |
| Reader / Idle | 881 | 1243 41% | 962 9% | 1367 55% | 864 -2% | 1252 ? 42% | |
| H.264 | 428 | 649 52% | 466 9% | 505 18% | 557 30% | 794 ? 86% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 520 | 352 -32% | 557 7% | 313 -40% | 485 -7% | 568 9% | 629 ? 21% |
| Load | 85 | 104 22% | 133 56% | 150 76% | 108 27% | 136 60% | 115.4 ? 36% |
Pro
Contra
O Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB é um sub portátil de boa aparência com muito desempenho de CPU e GPU graças à sua placa gráfica dedicada GeForce MX150. Nosso SKU particular deste portátil de 14 polegadas tem uma tela WQHD e um SSD de 512 GB, e é vendido por 1.199 Euros (~$1397) na Europa. Ele apresentava uma base muito robusta e dispositivos de entrada decentes, bem como um sensor de digitais para fácil identificação e autenticação. A disponibilidade de portas era decente e elaborada, infelizmente o portátil ainda não tinha uma porta Thunderbolt 3 que forneceria mais opções aos usuários.
O IdeaPad 530s-14IKB da Lenovo oferece um desempenho mais que decente, não apenas como um dispositivo multimídia. Sua longa duração de bateria se traduz em uma estamina muito decente.
Infelizmente, nem tudo o que brilha é ouro. O leitor de cartões SD era dolorosamente lento e o desempenho do Wi-Fi era medíocre, na melhor das hipóteses. A tela deixou-nos com sentimentos contraditórios devido à sua natureza altamente reflexiva e as consequências para a usabilidade em exteriores. O Core i7-8550U da Intel não conseguiu fornecer o máximo desempenho em aplicativos multi-thread, e suspeitamos que o Core i5-8250U mais barato não será mais lento.
No geral, o IdeaPad 530s-14IKB foi um dispositivo mais do que decente. Aqueles que procuram um portátil compacto não podem errar com este dispositivo e, portanto, merece nosso endosso completo.
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
-
07/11/2018 v6(old)
Sebastian Bade
Pricecompare
