Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Razer Blade Stealth (GTX 1650 Max-Q): Desempenho da Tela 4K, duração da bateria e CPU decepcionantes
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.7 % | 11/2019 | Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.5 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.30" | 3840x2160 | |
| 86.3 % | 10/2019 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 13 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.2 % | 10/2019 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 14.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.3 % | 10/2019 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 353 cd/m²
Contraste: 1412:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 5.49 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
| Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 AUO202B, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 13.30 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.40 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL LP140WF9-SPE2, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Sharp LQ133M1JW41, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 7% | 2% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.3 | 69.9 9% | 66 3% | 66.2 3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.8 | 99.2 4% | 97.9 2% | 97.2 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.7 | 71.5 9% | 67.3 2% | 67.1 2% |
| Response Times | 24% | 22% | 21% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 62 ? | 47.6 ? 23% | 49.6 ? 20% | 45.2 ? 27% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 39 ? | 29.2 ? 25% | 30 ? 23% | 33.2 ? 15% |
| PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | 22730 ? | ||
| Screen | 17% | 17% | 20% | |
| Brightness middle | 353 | 549.8 56% | 384 9% | 422.6 20% |
| Brightness | 335 | 520 55% | 363 8% | 404 21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 86 -4% | 90 0% | 87 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.39 -56% | 0.17 32% | 0.35 -40% |
| Contrast | 1412 | 1410 0% | 2259 60% | 1207 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 2.12 52% | 3.5 20% | 1.02 77% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.21 | 3.66 49% | 5.5 24% | 3.06 58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 1.37 -25% | 1 9% | 0.95 14% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.49 | 2.6 53% | 4.6 16% | 1 82% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.3 96% | 2.32 95% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 7689 85% | 6884 94% | 6884 94% | 6502 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61 | 65.4 7% | 62 2% | 62.1 2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96 | 99.7 4% | 97.7 2% | 97.1 1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 16% /
16% | 14% /
15% | 14% /
17% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 32 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3029 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4099 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4484 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 Lite-On CA3-8D512 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Average Lite-On CA3-8D512 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -22% | 1% | -10% | 0% | |
| Write 4K | 153 | 106.7 -30% | 128.4 -16% | 176.8 16% | 153 ? 0% |
| Read 4K | 59.5 | 49.94 -16% | 46.37 -22% | 48.38 -19% | 59.5 ? 0% |
| Write Seq | 1608 | 1223 -24% | 1863 16% | 1332 -17% | 1608 ? 0% |
| Read Seq | 2293 | 1801 -21% | 2340 2% | 1644 -28% | 2293 ? 0% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 497 | 325.3 -35% | 451.1 -9% | 440.6 -11% | 497 ? 0% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 544 | 551 1% | 415.3 -24% | 559 3% | 544 ? 0% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1640 | 1224 -25% | 2985 82% | 1104 -33% | 1640 ? 0% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3158 | 2350 -26% | 2565 -19% | 3481 10% | 3158 ? 0% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9381 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2859 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (41.5 - 65.1, n=11) | |
| Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11.2 - 92, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 230.7 | 186.6 | 169.3 | 70.3 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 137.5 | 84.9 | 46.3 | 27.5 | 17.5 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 134.6 | 93 | 50.9 | 41.7 | 18.3 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 30 / 30 dB |
| Carga |
| 33.9 / 38.1 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.3 °C / 95.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-7 °C / -12.6 F).
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.6 / 0.7 Watt |
| Ocioso | 10.7 / 13.6 / 15.7 Watt |
| Carga |
60 / 71 Watt |
   
| |
| Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Lite-On CA3-8D512, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 13.30 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.40 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 47% | 39% | 34% | -8% | 31% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 10.7 | 2.6 76% | 3.2 70% | 5.9 45% | 7.75 ? 28% | 4.9 ? 54% |
| Idle Average * | 13.6 | 5.3 61% | 7 49% | 8.1 40% | 11.8 ? 13% | 8.36 ? 39% |
| Idle Maximum * | 15.7 | 7 55% | 8.9 43% | 11.2 29% | 16.6 ? -6% | 10.4 ? 34% |
| Load Average * | 60 | 43.1 28% | 47.6 21% | 44.3 26% | 75.2 ? -25% | 45.9 ? 23% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 64 | 43.1 33% | 41.9 35% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 71 | 49 31% | 63.1 11% | 50.2 29% | 105.5 ? -49% | 66 ? 7% |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 53.1 Wh | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 51 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 53.1 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 63% | 53% | 77% | 88% | |
| Reader / Idle | 500 | 1252 ? 150% | |||
| H.264 | 376 | 793 111% | 794 ? 111% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 329 | 537 63% | 636 93% | 583 77% | 629 ? 91% |
| Load | 114 | 64 -44% | 115.4 ? 1% |
Pro
Contra
O Razer Blade Stealth consegue alcançar o equilíbrio: Não é apenas ultracompacto; o ultrabook Razer também é muito poderoso. Porém, isso só é válido para o desempenho da GPU - não estamos satisfeitos com o desempenho da CPU do modelo com a Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Obviamente, limitar o desempenho da CPU foi uma escolha consciente da Razer. A limitação de 15 W deve manter o calor e o ruído baixos, o que a Razer consegue fazer. Mesmo assim: Não é compreensível que a CPU esteja bloqueada em 15 W, mesmo que a GPU não esteja ativa.
Outra diferença importante deste modelo em comparação com o iGPU Razer Blade Stealth é a tela 4K UHD. Infelizmente, sua qualidade é decepcionante para nós. Não é um painel ruim, mas comparado ao painel FHD do iGPU Razer Blade, ele não oferece outras vantagens além da resolução mais alta e da superfície táctil. Em algumas áreas, o oposto é verdadeiro: A tela FHD mais acessível é visivelmente mais brilhante que a tela 4K. A tela de alta resolução também cria outra desvantagem, pois o modelo 4K tem um consumo de energia muito maior. O resultado é uma duração da bateria pobre, o que é muito ruim para um portátil tão pequeno. Por último, mas não menos importante, temos que reclamar da curta garantia padrão de um ano.
Apesar das especificações premium em geral: Este modelo específico do Razer Blade Stealth não é recomendável. A maior razão para isso é a decepcionante tela 4K.
É por isso que não podemos recomendar o Razer Blade Stealth 13 - mas apenas o modelo com a tela 4K. Em vez disso, os consumidores interessados devem procurar o modelo FHD que apresenta a GPU GeForce GTX. Essa variante é mais acessível e combina as melhores qualidades do Razer Blade Stealth com o desempenho da GPU dedicada. Com a tela de resolução mais baixa, a duração da bateria também deve ser melhor.
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
-
11/11/2019 v7
Benjamin Herzig
Pricecompare
