snhb.queue.push(function(){ snhb.addAdditionalAdSlotsToRefresh(additionalAdSlots); }); googletag.enableServices(); }); nbc_pagecall();
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Razer Blade Stealth (GTX 1650 Max-Q): Desempenho da Tela 4K, duração da bateria e CPU decepcionantes

Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/15/2019

Tela mais barata, melhor escolha!? A Razer tentou criar a melhor máquina para “gamers” em movimento. O resultado é o novo Razer Blade Stealth. Ele tem muitas boas qualidades, como sua poderosa GPU, mas a tela 4K não conseguiu nos satisfazer. O desempenho da CPU também poderia ser melhor.

Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 (Blade Stealth Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-1065G7
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 4096 MB, Análises do: 1254 MHz, Memoría: 1751 MHz, 1F91, 436.15, Optimus (Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7)
Memória
16384 MB 
, LPDDR4-3744, onboard
Pantalha
13.3 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 331 PPI, 10 pontos de toque, AUO202B, IPS LED, Brilhante: sim, HDR
placa mãe
Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)
Disco rígido
Lite-On CA3-8D512,
Placa de Som
Intel Ice Lake-U/Y PCH-LP cAVS
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 15.3 x 304.6 x 210
Bateria
53.1 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p com infravermelho
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Sistema com quatro alto-falantes, Teclado: Chiclet de 6 filas com luz de fundo multicolor, Iluminação do Teclado: sim
peso
1.471 kg, Suprimento de energia: 582 g
Preço
2199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionBest Price
84%11/2019Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
1.5 kg15.3 mm13.3"3840x2160
86%10/2019Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1.3 kg13 mm13.4"1920x1200
88%10/2019Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1.4 kg14.95 mm14"1920x1080
86%10/2019Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1.4 kg15.3 mm13.3"1920x1080

Size and weight comparison

320.3 mm 215.6 mm 14.95 mm 1.4 kg304.6 mm 210 mm 15.3 mm 1.5 kg296 mm 207 mm 13 mm 1.3 kg
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3
Broadcom 802.11ac
730 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
703 (min: 641, max: 729) MBit/s ∼96%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
674 MBit/s ∼92% -4%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
640 MBit/s ∼88% -9%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
635 MBit/s ∼87% -10%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Broadcom 802.11ac
570 (min: 566, max: 572) MBit/s ∼78% -19%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (30.9 - 950, n=127)
536 MBit/s ∼73% -24%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
743 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3
Broadcom 802.11ac
710 MBit/s ∼96% +11%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
644 MBit/s ∼87% +1%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
638 (min: 626, max: 644) MBit/s ∼86%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (36 - 949, n=127)
532 MBit/s ∼72% -17%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Broadcom 802.11ac
461 (min: 216, max: 525) MBit/s ∼62% -28%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
356 MBit/s ∼48% -44%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730Tooltip
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø703 (641-729)
Apple MacBook Air 2018 Broadcom 802.11ac; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10: Ø478 (462-488)
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø638 (626-644)
Apple MacBook Air 2018 Broadcom 802.11ac; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø454 (216-525)
333
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AUO202B
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 359 cd/m² Médio: 335.4 cd/m² Minimum: 7.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 353 cd/m²
Contraste: 1412:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 5.49 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
AUO202B, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
LP140WF9-SPE2, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Sharp LQ133M1JW41, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
24%
22%
21%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
62 (30, 32)
47.6 (23.2, 24.4)
23%
49.6 (23.6, 26)
20%
45.2 (22.4, 22.8)
27%
Response Time Black / White *
39 (24, 15)
29.2 (16, 13.2)
25%
30 (16.4, 13.6)
23%
33.2 (17.6, 15.6)
15%
PWM Frequency
2500 (25)
22730 (24)
Screen
17%
17%
20%
Brightness middle
353
549.8
56%
384
9%
422.6
20%
Brightness
335
520
55%
363
8%
404
21%
Brightness Distribution
90
86
-4%
90
0%
87
-3%
Black Level *
0.25
0.39
-56%
0.17
32%
0.35
-40%
Contrast
1412
1410
0%
2259
60%
1207
-15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.4
2.12
52%
3.5
20%
1.02
77%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.21
3.66
49%
5.5
24%
3.06
58%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.1
1.37
-25%
1
9%
0.95
14%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.49
2.6
53%
4.6
16%
1
82%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.3 96%
2.32 95%
2.21 100%
CCT
7689 85%
6884 94%
6884 94%
6502 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61
65.4
7%
62
2%
62.1
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
99.7
4%
97.7
2%
97.1
1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
21% / 18%
20% / 17%
21% / 20%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 30 ms rise
↘ 32 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9364 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840Tooltip
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø483 (464-551)
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø672 (632.81-836.68)
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7; Performance Mode: Ø702 (693.71-740.11)
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø672 (659-720)
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø671 (663.4-722.7)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Core i7-1065G7
179 Points ∼100% +5%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
174 Points ∼97% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7
  (149 - 183, n=6)
172 Points ∼96% +1%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
171 Points ∼96%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7
149 Points ∼83% -13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20 - 185, n=280)
117 Points ∼65% -32%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
830 Points ∼100% +51%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Core i7-1065G7
740 (min: 693, max: 740) Points ∼89% +34%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Core i7-1065G7
720 (min: 659, max: 720) Points ∼87% +31%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7
  (521 - 830, n=7)
684 Points ∼82% +24%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7
676 Points ∼81% +23%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7
551 (min: 464, max: 551) Points ∼66%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (32 - 1051, n=290)
345 Points ∼42% -37%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
551 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
171 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
96.69 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512
4338 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
 
4338 Points ∼100% 0%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
3998 Points ∼92% -8%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3900 Points ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
3796 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (534 - 4338, n=95)
2504 Points ∼58% -42%
Productivity
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7245 Points ∼100% +8%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
7179 Points ∼99% +7%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6924 Points ∼96% +3%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512
6739 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
 
6739 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1014 - 7281, n=95)
5268 Points ∼73% -22%
Essentials
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9678 Points ∼100% +16%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
9678 Points ∼100% +16%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9664 Points ∼100% +15%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512
8373 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
 
8373 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2062 - 9664, n=95)
6875 Points ∼71% -18%
Score
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
4677 Points ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4609 Points ∼99% +3%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4583 Points ∼98% +2%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512
4484 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
 
4484 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (743 - 4609, n=98)
3186 Points ∼68% -29%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5173 Points ∼100% +26%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5158 Points ∼100% +26%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
5086 Points ∼98% +24%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512
4099 Points ∼79%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
 
4099 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1283 - 5363, n=220)
4063 Points ∼79% -1%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4030 Points ∼100% +33%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4003 Points ∼99% +32%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
3982 Points ∼99% +31%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1027 - 4211, n=248)
3044 Points ∼76% 0%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512
3029 Points ∼75%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
 
3029 Points ∼75% 0%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3029 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4099 pontos
Ajuda
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
Lite-On CA3-8D512
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Average Lite-On CA3-8D512
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-22%
1%
-10%
0%
Write 4K
153
106.7
-30%
128.4
-16%
176.8
16%
153
0%
Read 4K
59.52
49.94
-16%
46.37
-22%
48.38
-19%
59.5
0%
Write Seq
1608
1223
-24%
1863
16%
1332
-17%
1608
0%
Read Seq
2293
1801
-21%
2340
2%
1644
-28%
2293
0%
Write 4K Q32T1
497
325.3
-35%
451.1
-9%
440.6
-11%
497
0%
Read 4K Q32T1
543.6
550.5
1%
415.3
-24%
559.2
3%
544
0%
Write Seq Q32T1
1640
1224
-25%
2985
82%
1104
-33%
1640
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3158
2350
-26%
2565
-19%
3481
10%
3158
0%
Lite-On CA3-8D512
Sequential Read: 2130 MB/s
Sequential Write: 534.5 MB/s
512K Read: 1631 MB/s
512K Write: 1153 MB/s
4K Read: 58.83 MB/s
4K Write: 157.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 556 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 486.9 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
12388 Points ∼100% +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (10422 - 11764, n=7)
11095 Points ∼90% +4%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1065G7
10699 Points ∼86%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
4613 Points ∼37% -57%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
4594 Points ∼37% -57%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
4252 Points ∼34% -60%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (230 - 10699, n=368)
1319 Points ∼11% -88%
3DMark - 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
3353 Points ∼100% +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (2836 - 3060, n=6)
2953 Points ∼88% +4%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1065G7
2840 Points ∼85%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
835 Points ∼25% -71%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
833 Points ∼25% -71%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
792 Points ∼24% -72%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (85 - 2840, n=42)
553 Points ∼16% -81%
3DMark 11 Performance
9381 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
2859 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
64.8 fps ∼100% +40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (46.3 - 54.8, n=5)
50.7 fps ∼78% +10%
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
46.3 fps ∼71%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
19.1 fps ∼29% -59%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (3.8 - 46.3, n=27)
14.2 fps ∼22% -69%
05101520253035Tooltip
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512: Ø28.1 (25-30)
baixo média alto ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 230.7 186.6 169.3 70.3 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 137.5 84.9 46.3 27.5 17.5 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 134.6 93 50.9 41.7 18.3 fps

Barulho

Ocioso
30 / 30 / 30 dB
Carga
33.9 / 38.1 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.934.53332.835.92536.635.534.934.836.63138.834.838.138.738.84034.933.931.634.234.95038.135.632.536.738.16332.232.631.830.532.28027.426.726.625.527.410025.526.825.924.925.512524.925.125.523.724.916023.623.823.623.423.620023.223.322.622.523.225024.522.621.421.524.531524.522.22120.724.540023.221.319.819.923.250022.320.719.719.122.363021.92018.919.221.98002320.917.818.123100025.321.417.617.825.3125024.421.617.317.224.4160027.823.817.51727.820002923.817.317.329250030.524.817.517.430.5315029.723.117.317.429.7400023.82017.617.723.850002118.717.717.721630019.918.317.917.919.9800018.718.117.917.918.71000018.218.217.917.918.21250017.91817.817.817.91600017.917.917.817.817.9SPL38.233.930.130.138.2N2.61.91.41.42.6median 23.6median 21.4median 17.9median 17.9median 23.6Delta1.82.31.41.41.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseRazer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
 44.1 °C46.9 °C38.9 °C 
 39.1 °C42.1 °C37.9 °C 
 35.3 °C32.6 °C34.7 °C 
Máximo: 46.9 °C
Médio: 39.1 °C
38.7 °C46.3 °C38.7 °C
36.8 °C43.4 °C41.2 °C
34.8 °C38.6 °C37.2 °C
Máximo: 46.3 °C
Médio: 39.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  51.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40 °C / 104 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.3 °C / 95.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.6 °C / 83.5 F (-6.7 °C / -12 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.232.835.22535.434.835.43136.538.736.54033.134.233.15031.736.731.76329.130.529.18030.525.530.510036.224.936.212543.323.743.316044.723.444.72004122.54125050.421.550.431557.220.757.240064.719.964.750064.619.164.663068.519.268.580065.718.165.710006717.867125063.517.263.51600671767200065.817.365.825006217.462315063.817.463.8400059.417.759.4500059.617.759.6630060.917.960.980005917.959100005817.9581250057.417.857.41600055.317.855.3SPL7630.176N38.11.438.1median 59.6median 17.9median 59.6Delta6.61.46.64144.438.239.33838.136.238.936.837.338.537.236.336.934.945.933.453.533.359.832.361.331.661.530.665.429.96629.663.229.269.728.873.228.27427.670.227.569.827.670.227.265.72756.72761.32762.526.966.426.867.126.87126.66626.761.439.980.73.851.2median 27.6median 65.723.133.733.526.126.628.831.629.829.924.630.222.440.121.841.82351.12353.52258.822.963.322.767.120.56920.370.919.168.518.869.11868.518.164.817.36616.966.216.663.416.464.916.162.816.162.516561652.315.947.515.746.815.546.815.341.829.376.81.240.5median 17.3median 63.327.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.49 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.6 / 0.7 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 10.7 / 13.6 / 15.7 Watt
Carga midlight 60 / 71 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Lite-On CA3-8D512, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
47%
39%
34%
1%
35%
Idle Minimum *
10.7
2.6
76%
3.2
70%
5.9
45%
6.4 (4.2 - 10.7, n=5)
40%
6.62 (1 - 36, n=604)
38%
Idle Average *
13.6
5.3
61%
7
49%
8.1
40%
11.2 (7.8 - 13.6, n=5)
18%
9.82 (2.06 - 39, n=604)
28%
Idle Maximum *
15.7
7
55%
8.9
43%
11.2
29%
16.2 (10.2 - 24, n=5)
-3%
12.1 (3.9 - 55, n=604)
23%
Load Average *
60
43.1
28%
47.6
21%
44.3
26%
70.9 (60 - 76, n=5)
-18%
33.5 (6.3 - 75, n=594)
44%
Load Maximum *
71
49
31%
63.1
11%
50.2
29%
93.9 (71 - 114, n=5)
-32%
40.7 (7.6 - 111, n=597)
43%
Witcher 3 ultra *
64
43.1
33%
41.9
35%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
8h 20min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
5h 29min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 max Brightness (Edge)
4h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 16min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 54min
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7
1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 53.1 Wh
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 51 Wh
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 53.1 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
63%
53%
77%
25%
Reader / Idle
500
622 (87 - 2557, n=552)
24%
H.264
376
793
111%
475 (182 - 1174, n=116)
26%
WiFi v1.3
329
537
63%
636
93%
583
77%
475 (206 - 806, n=222)
44%
Load
114
64
-44%
122 (40 - 347, n=560)
7%

Pro

+ Chassi de alumínio premium
+ Touchpad muito bom
+ Forte desempenho da GPU com um design compacto
+ Bom alto-falantes
+ A ventoinha permanece inativa a maior parte do tempo.

Contra

- Desempenho reduzido da CPU sem carga na GPU
- LCD 4K UHD decepcionante no geral
- Duração ruim da bateria
- Apenas um ano de garantia para um portátil premium
in review: Razer Blade Stealth. Test sample provided by Razer.
in review: Razer Blade Stealth. Test sample provided by Razer.

O Razer Blade Stealth consegue alcançar o equilíbrio: Não é apenas ultracompacto; o ultrabook Razer também é muito poderoso. Porém, isso só é válido para o desempenho da GPU - não estamos satisfeitos com o desempenho da CPU do modelo com a Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q. 

Obviamente, limitar o desempenho da CPU foi uma escolha consciente da Razer. A limitação de 15 W deve manter o calor e o ruído baixos, o que a Razer consegue fazer. Mesmo assim: Não é compreensível que a CPU esteja bloqueada em 15 W, mesmo que a GPU não esteja ativa.

Outra diferença importante deste modelo em comparação com o iGPU Razer Blade Stealth é a tela 4K UHD. Infelizmente, sua qualidade é decepcionante para nós. Não é um painel ruim, mas comparado ao painel FHD do iGPU Razer Blade, ele não oferece outras vantagens além da resolução mais alta e da superfície táctil. Em algumas áreas, o oposto é verdadeiro: A tela FHD mais acessível é visivelmente mais brilhante que a tela 4K. A tela de alta resolução também cria outra desvantagem, pois o modelo 4K tem um consumo de energia muito maior. O resultado é uma duração da bateria pobre, o que é muito ruim para um portátil tão pequeno. Por último, mas não menos importante, temos que reclamar da curta garantia padrão de um ano. 

Apesar das especificações premium em geral: Este modelo específico do Razer Blade Stealth não é recomendável. A maior razão para isso é a decepcionante tela 4K.

É por isso que não podemos recomendar o Razer Blade Stealth 13 - mas apenas o modelo com a tela 4K. Em vez disso, os consumidores interessados devem procurar o modelo FHD que apresenta a GPU GeForce GTX. Essa variante é mais acessível e combina as melhores qualidades do Razer Blade Stealth com o desempenho da GPU dedicada. Com a tela de resolução mais baixa, a duração da bateria também deve ser melhor.

Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 - 11/11/2019 v7
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento
89 / 98 → 90%
Teclado
75%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
58 / 75 → 77%
Peso
69 / 20-75 → 90%
Bateria
66%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
77 / 78 → 99%
Desempenho da aplicação
80 / 85 → 95%
Temperatura
86%
Ruído
96%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
37 / 85 → 44%
Médio
74%
84%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Razer Blade Stealth (GTX 1650 Max-Q): Desempenho da Tela 4K, duração da bateria e CPU decepcionantes
Benjamin Herzig, 2019-11-15 (Update: 2019-11-21)