Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite - Smartphone com uma bateria potente

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 03/03/2020

Nem tão lite. O Galaxy S10 provavelmente será o último membro da família S10 e, apesar de alguns recursos serem omitidos, o preço de rua sugerido inicial é o mais baixo, o smartphone Samsung ainda é uma oferta atraente, graças a uma configuração atualizada da câmera, uma bateria grande e uma poderoso chip Snapdragon.

Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Galaxy S Serie)
Placa gráfica
Memória
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Pantalha
6.7 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, 10 pontos multi-touch, Super AMOLED Plus, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 105.5 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD de até 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor hall effect, sensor RGB e sensor de proximidade, bússola digital, Ant+, OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1.800 e 1.900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (bandas 1, 2, 4, 5 e 8), LTE Cat. 11/5 (bandas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 e 66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.1 x 162.5 x 75.6
Bateria
4500 mAh Lítio-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (Wide-angle lens: 1/2.0", 0.8 µm, f/2.0, Super Steady OIS, UHD video) + 12 MP (ultra-wide angle lens: 1/3.0", 1.12 µm, f/2.2) + 5 MP (1/5.0", 1.12 µm, macro lens: f/2.6), camera2 API level: 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (1/2.74", 0.8 µm, f/2.2, fixed-focus lens)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: onscreen, Charger (5.0 V - 3.0 A; 9.0 V - 2.77 A), cabo USB, SIM tool, fones, documentação, One UI 2.0, Netflix, Spotify, Facebook, Microsoft Office and OneDrive, 24 Meses Garantia, Head SAR: 0.490 W/kg, body SAR: 1.519 W/kg, DRM Widevine L1, single-band GNSS: GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, QZSS, Galileo and SBAS, fanless
peso
186 g, Suprimento de energia: 70 g
Preço
649 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86 %
03/2020
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
SD 855, Adreno 640
186 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"2400x1080
87 %
03/2019
Samsung Galaxy S10
Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12
157 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.1"3040x1440
86 %
04/2019
Huawei P30
Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10
165 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.1"2340x1080
86 %
03/2019
Xiaomi Mi 9
SD 855, Adreno 640
173 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.39"2340x1080
85 %
07/2019
LG G8s ThinQ
SD 855, Adreno 640
181 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.2"2248x1080

Size Comparison

162.5 mm 75.6 mm 8.1 mm 186 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g155.3 mm 76.6 mm 7.99 mm 181 g149.9 mm 70.4 mm 7.8 mm 157 g149.1 mm 71.36 mm 7.57 mm 165 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 (min: 612, max: 683) MBit/s ∼94% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
612 (min: 473, max: 652) MBit/s ∼90%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
578 (min: 474, max: 617) MBit/s ∼85% -6%
Huawei P30
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
544 (min: 38, max: 618) MBit/s ∼80% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=504)
244 MBit/s ∼36% -60%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P30
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
680 (min: 646, max: 700) MBit/s ∼100% +108%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 (min: 558, max: 592) MBit/s ∼85% +77%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼79% +63%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
502 (min: 465, max: 517) MBit/s ∼74% +54%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
327 (min: 155, max: 377) MBit/s ∼48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 966, n=504)
227 MBit/s ∼33% -31%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø611 (473-652)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø322 (155-377)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Standard wide angle
Standard wide angle
Ultra wide angle
Standard wide angle
Standard wide angle
Ultra wide angle
Standard wide angle
Standard wide angle
Ultra wide angle
Ultra wide angle
Standard wide angle
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
50.7 ∆E
38 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
59.7 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
59.7 ∆E
60.8 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
67.2 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
70.5 ∆E
66.9 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite: 43.57 ∆E min: 14.11 - max: 70.48 ∆E
ColorChecker
17.2 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
15 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
15 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
13 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite: 11.29 ∆E min: 3 - max: 21.73 ∆E
Test chart @ 2,500 lux
Test chart center section
Test chart @ 1 lux
Test chart @ 2,500 lux (ultra wide angle)
621
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
646
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
622
cd/m²
644
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
638
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 646 cd/m² Médio: 630.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.74 cd/m²
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 622 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
98.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.09
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.7
Samsung Galaxy S10
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.1
Samsung Galaxy S10e
AMOLED, 2280x1080, 5.8
Huawei P30
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.1
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
LG G8s ThinQ
P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Screen
-5%
7%
20%
28%
-11%
Brightness middle
622
701
13%
426
-32%
561
-10%
593
-5%
539
-13%
Brightness
630
705
12%
427
-32%
560
-11%
587
-7%
556
-12%
Brightness Distribution
96
98
2%
96
0%
95
-1%
94
-2%
88
-8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.7
3.7
-37%
2.14
21%
1.5
44%
0.9
67%
3.78
-40%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.9
10.3
-75%
3.29
44%
2.5
58%
2
66%
6.95
-18%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3
1.4
53%
1.8
40%
1.8
40%
1.5
50%
2.2
27%
Gamma
2.09 105%
2.1 105%
2.111 104%
2.2 100%
2.27 97%
2.274 97%
CCT
6246 104%
6553 99%
6329 103%
6512 100%
6548 99%
6013 108%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17159 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).
Geekbench 5.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
2722 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2856 Points ∼100% +5%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2666 Points ∼93% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2573 - 2856, n=5)
2714 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (782 - 3531, n=39)
2030 Points ∼71% -25%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
740 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
742 Points ∼99% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
746 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (740 - 751, n=5)
745 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 1342, n=39)
588 Points ∼79% -21%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10887 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10162 Points ∼92% -7%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9547 Points ∼87% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼100% +1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10274 Points ∼93% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10187 - 11388, n=14)
10955 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13279, n=398)
4834 Points ∼44% -56%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3406 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4499 Points ∼100% +32%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3207 Points ∼71% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼78% +3%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3406 Points ∼76% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3406 - 3537, n=14)
3480 Points ∼77% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=398)
1467 Points ∼33% -57%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10093 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7595 Points ∼75% -25%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8016 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼90% -10%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9125 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8342 - 11440, n=18)
9675 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=438)
5517 Points ∼55% -45%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11718 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9750 Points ∼80% -17%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9890 Points ∼82% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼91% -6%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11890 Points ∼98% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10330 - 14439, n=18)
12128 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=601)
6014 Points ∼50% -49%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3276 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3080 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼100% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2794 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2104 - 3365, n=18)
3027 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=105)
2672 Points ∼81% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5817 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4613 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼98% -2%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4236 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4236 - 5884, n=18)
5608 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=105)
2795 Points ∼48% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4962 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4165 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼99% -1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3800 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3800 - 5012, n=18)
4704 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=105)
2532 Points ∼51% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4418 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2981 Points ∼67% -33%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2682 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼85% -15%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3309 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1934 - 4576, n=18)
3876 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=444)
2043 Points ∼46% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7148 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5358 Points ∼75% -25%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4162 Points ∼58% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼99% -1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5184 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5184 - 7148, n=18)
6793 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9345, n=444)
1882 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6285 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4551 Points ∼72% -28%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3707 Points ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼94% -6%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4604 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3969 - 6312, n=18)
5788 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 7982, n=445)
1748 Points ∼28% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4208 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2550 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼90% -10%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3293 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2345 - 4703, n=17)
3847 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5209, n=473)
1954 Points ∼46% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10410 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3491 Points ∼34% -66%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼99% -1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6358 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6358 - 10420, n=17)
9544 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=473)
2498 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7842 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3226 Points ∼41% -59%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼95% -5%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5268 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5268 - 8141, n=17)
7140 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=473)
2105 Points ∼27% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4324 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2854 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3496 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼87% -13%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3242 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2705 - 4429, n=18)
3941 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4909, n=524)
1946 Points ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6312 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5176 Points ∼81% -18%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4200 Points ∼66% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6040 Points ∼95% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5663 - 6362, n=18)
6246 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=524)
1571 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5727 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4383 Points ∼77% -23%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4020 Points ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼96% -4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5068 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4556 - 5747, n=18)
5510 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7012, n=525)
1504 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4201 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3548 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼86% -14%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3505 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3001 - 4540, n=17)
3884 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=565)
1814 Points ∼43% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9670 Points ∼97%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3281 Points ∼33% -66%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +3%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6122 Points ∼61% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6122 - 10008, n=17)
9279 Points ∼93% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11488, n=564)
2053 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7500 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3337 Points ∼44% -56%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼96% -4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5251 Points ∼70% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5251 - 7820, n=17)
7066 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8866, n=567)
1774 Points ∼24% -76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
40137 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
31297 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
21257 Points ∼53% -47%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼63% -37%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30972 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (20636 - 45072, n=17)
32285 Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=715)
14596 Points ∼36% -64%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
108114 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
71292 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
44261 Points ∼41% -59%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼99% -1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
97354 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (97354 - 110432, n=16)
105803 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=713)
23210 Points ∼21% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
78551 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55524 Points ∼71% -29%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
35680 Points ∼45% -55%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼79% -21%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
65945 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (55771 - 83518, n=16)
69395 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=713)
18684 Points ∼24% -76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
166 fps ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
143 fps ∼86% -14%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
122 fps ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
85 fps ∼51% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (85 - 167, n=19)
154 fps ∼92% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=734)
40.4 fps ∼24% -76%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
60 fps ∼94% 0%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
59 fps ∼93% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼94% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼94% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (59 - 91, n=19)
63.6 fps ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=743)
29.1 fps ∼46% -51%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
99 fps ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
85 fps ∼85% -14%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
87 fps ∼87% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
50 fps ∼50% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (50 - 102, n=19)
92.8 fps ∼93% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=638)
23.5 fps ∼24% -76%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼88% -12%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
59 fps ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (51 - 85, n=19)
60.3 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=647)
20.3 fps ∼34% -66%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
69 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼77% -23%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
50 fps ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35 fps ∼51% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (35 - 71, n=19)
62.5 fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=503)
19 fps ∼28% -72%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
30 fps ∼52% -47%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
54 fps ∼93% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +2%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼62% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (36 - 58, n=19)
48.8 fps ∼84% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=505)
17.6 fps ∼30% -69%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
25 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼64% -36%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
20 fps ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼96% -4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
14 fps ∼56% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (14 - 26, n=18)
21.9 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=238)
10.3 fps ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
14 fps ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼94% -6%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8.5 fps ∼50% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8.5 - 24, n=19)
16.5 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 68, n=236)
7.41 fps ∼44% -56%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
25 fps ∼66% -34%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼97% -3%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼58% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 38, n=18)
34.1 fps ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=242)
15.3 fps ∼40% -60%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
44 fps ∼100% +5%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps ∼70% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼93% -2%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼50% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 43, n=19)
40.4 fps ∼92% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 165, n=242)
17.4 fps ∼40% -59%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
35 fps ∼81% -19%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
30 fps ∼70% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼98% -2%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼51% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22 - 43, n=19)
39.6 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=428)
12.9 fps ∼30% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
37 fps ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼61% -38%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
27 fps ∼71% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +3%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
21 fps ∼55% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (21 - 41, n=19)
32.5 fps ∼86% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=432)
11.5 fps ∼30% -69%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
451559 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
440822 Points ∼98% -2%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
424308 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (376698 - 451559, n=7)
428686 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 599843, n=53)
281636 Points ∼62% -38%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1414 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1385 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1246 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼97% -3%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1171 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1076 - 1601, n=18)
1348 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=668)
778 Points ∼55% -45%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8598 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7361 Points ∼79% -14%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6751 Points ∼73% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼100% +8%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8414 Points ∼91% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8125 - 9510, n=18)
9164 Points ∼99% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=668)
2206 Points ∼24% -74%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5287 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4570 Points ∼84% -14%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5425 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼74% -24%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4324 Points ∼80% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (2661 - 7500, n=18)
5025 Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=668)
1619 Points ∼30% -69%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8515 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7476 Points ∼86% -12%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7684 Points ∼88% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼97% -1%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8718 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5993 - 9143, n=18)
8546 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=668)
3145 Points ∼36% -63%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4837 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4320 Points ∼89% -11%
Huawei P30
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4327 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼95% -5%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4389 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3847 - 5397, n=18)
4772 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=668)
1580 Points ∼33% -67%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
63.778 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=16)
58.8 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼90% -10%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
53.783 Points ∼84% -16%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
48.635 Points ∼76% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=133)
37.1 Points ∼58% -42%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
112.3 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
110.54 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90.8 - 120, n=16)
110 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
96.309 Points ∼86% -14%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
94.144 Points ∼84% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
84.005 Points ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=564)
43.6 Points ∼39% -61%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼100% +6%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chome 75)
64.1 runs/min ∼98% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
62.2 runs/min ∼95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=15)
62 runs/min ∼94% 0%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
58.7 runs/min ∼89% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
54 runs/min ∼82% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=121)
40.6 runs/min ∼62% -35%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼100% +14%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼99% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=19)
105 Points ∼97% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
95 Points ∼88%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
90 Points ∼83% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=196)
67.6 Points ∼63% -29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼100% +7%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
23830 Points ∼97% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25640, n=19)
23198 Points ∼95% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
22942 Points ∼94%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
20714 Points ∼84% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20286 Points ∼83% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=725)
7128 Points ∼29% -69%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=750)
10258 ms * ∼100% -380%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (Chrome 80)
2138.6 ms * ∼21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=18)
2133 ms * ∼21% -0%
Huawei P30 (Chrome 73)
2094.7 ms * ∼20% +2%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
2036 ms * ∼20% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1924.2 ms * ∼19% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼18% +12%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy S10 LiteSamsung Galaxy S10Huawei P30Xiaomi Mi 9LG G8s ThinQAverage 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-36%
-16%
-27%
-43%
-1%
-58%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
71.33 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
17%
46.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-23%
58.1 (54.5 - 61, n=6)
-5%
50.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=470)
-18%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
82.82 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
9%
67.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
70.4 (66.3 - 76, n=6)
-7%
68.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=470)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
173.54
24.44
-86%
195.3
13%
165.32
-5%
29.6
-83%
174 (29.9 - 230, n=7)
0%
26.1 (0.14 - 259, n=802)
-85%
Random Read 4KB
191.67
137.4
-28%
138.79
-28%
149.36
-22%
138
-28%
193 (170 - 205, n=7)
1%
51.3 (1.59 - 226, n=802)
-73%
Sequential Write 256KB
524.56
193.24
-63%
186.03
-65%
388.27
-26%
182.4
-65%
550 (218 - 697, n=7)
5%
107 (2.99 - 729, n=802)
-80%
Sequential Read 256KB
1488.59
831.94
-44%
908.94
-39%
666.06
-55%
791.1
-47%
1501 (1406 - 1632, n=7)
1%
295 (12.1 - 1781, n=802)
-80%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.16.0: Ø59.8 (48-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.0.5a: Ø29.4 (7-37)
Carga Máxima
 34.3 °C34 °C31.7 °C 
 35.1 °C35 °C31.7 °C 
 34.5 °C34.1 °C31.5 °C 
Máximo: 35.1 °C
Médio: 33.5 °C
30.5 °C31.1 °C32.5 °C
29.4 °C33.3 °C34.3 °C
29.7 °C33.3 °C36.3 °C
Máximo: 36.3 °C
Médio: 32.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  27.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.135.22532.929.53127.131.34030.5305033.839.56325.923.48023.61910024.622.512520.428.316019.542.820018.746.625017.25231516.557.940014.462.850016.366.763015.36780014.67010001471.7125014.971.8160014.274.620001575.4250014.776.7315014.578.5400014.380.5500014.678.6630015.179.780001581.31000014.975.21250015.360160001649.7SPL2788.9N0.976.2median 15median 70Delta1.312.132.534.431.925.722.326.821.724.929.23126.725.520.324.620.530.52335.815.647.417.846.616.353.215.456.115.955.915.857.913.361.314.162.514.167.91470.213.572.613.469.413.970.114.272.113.975.514.670.814.266.814.768.8156814.958.715.34326.482.40.851.4median 14.7median 62.50.99.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S10 LiteHuawei P30
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P30 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.27 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.58 / 1.55 / 1.64 Watt
Carga midlight 4.29 / 8.03 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10
3400 mAh
Huawei P30
3650 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-3%
-21%
4%
-35%
-18%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
0.58
0.61
-5%
0.69
-19%
0.67
-16%
1.2
-107%
0.939 (0.58 - 1.96, n=19)
-62%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=818)
-52%
Idle Average *
1.55
1.27
18%
2.41
-55%
1.26
19%
1.6
-3%
1.506 (0.85 - 2.8, n=19)
3%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=817)
-12%
Idle Maximum *
1.64
1.3
21%
2.51
-53%
1.29
21%
2
-22%
1.799 (1 - 2.9, n=19)
-10%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=818)
-24%
Load Average *
4.29
6.17
-44%
3.86
10%
3.71
14%
5
-17%
4.61 (3.64 - 5.8, n=19)
-7%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=812)
5%
Load Maximum *
8.03
8.55
-6%
6.96
13%
9.3
-16%
10
-25%
9.04 (7.49 - 11.9, n=19)
-13%
5.99 (1.2 - 14.2, n=812)
25%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
41h 44min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 80)
13h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 43min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 42min
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10
3400 mAh
Huawei P30
3650 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Battery Runtime
-38%
-14%
-24%
-24%
Reader / Idle
2504
1259
-50%
1914
-24%
1650
-34%
1689
-33%
H.264
1183
842
-29%
1050
-11%
1008
-15%
753
-36%
WiFi v1.3
823
427
-48%
715
-13%
546
-34%
693
-16%
Load
222
170
-23%
208
-6%
194
-13%
203
-9%

Pro

+ SoC veloz
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Muito boa tela
+ Armazenamento expansível
+ Boa qualidade das chamadas
+ Equipamento de câmera decente...

Contra

- ...com déficit de qualidade no modo OIS super estável
- Sem certificação IP
- Sem carregamento sem fio
- Carregador de 45 watts não incluído
- Apenas um alto falante mono

Veredicto - Poder, Finalmente

In review: Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (SM-G770F). Test device courtesy of:
In review: Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite (SM-G770F). Test device courtesy of:

O Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite é mais do que aparenta, já que não é apenas uma versão barata dos modelos S10 nominalmente mais caros. Primeiro e acima de tudo, agora é finalmente capaz de fornecer uma duração convincente de bateria, algo que se deve principalmente à bateria grande, mas também, em parte, ao fato de um processador Exynos não ser mais usado. Nesta categoria principal, nenhum dos irmãos do suposto modelo Lite consegue parecer muito bom em comparação.

No entanto, alguns compromissos tiveram que ser feitos, resultando na menor resolução de tela do S10 Lite em comparação com os dispositivos carros-chefes e na omissão de padrões de comunicação modernos, como Wi-Fi 6 ou 5G. Além disso, o fabricante coreano retirou o recurso de áudio duplo Bluetooth e o carregamento sem fio.

Embora o Galaxy S10 Lite possa não ser o melhor modelo Galaxy S10, ele tem mais energia. Isso torna fácil aceitar a falta de alguns recursos.

Quanto à câmera, a Samsung escolheu um caminho diferente que ilumina a natureza mais barata do telefone. Embora a resolução da câmera do S10 Lite seja mais alta, a qualidade da imagem das câmeras fica aquém da dos outros modelos S10 com uma abertura modular. Da mesma forma, houve recortes quando se trata da câmera frontal, pois as contagens altas de megapixels foram priorizadas em relação à qualidade e não há foco automático. Embora o OIS Super Steady seja decente, a degradação da qualidade da imagem é muito alta. No geral, a qualidade da câmera da S10 Lite ainda é boa, embora seja claramente incapaz de enfrentar seus irmãos mais avançados.

A Samsung não oferece aos compradores em potencial uma escolha fácil, principalmente aos preços atuais. Embora o Galaxy S10 seja simplesmente mais barato, desaconselhamos o S10e a seu preço atual. O Galaxy S10 Lite já pode ser a escolha certa para usuários interessados em uma tela grande e, em particular, na duração da bateria muito longa e também menos encantados com os recursos avançados dos outros modelos. Para todos os outros, recomendamos que você tenha paciência por alguns meses, pois esse smartphone provavelmente cairá de preço e provavelmente estará em oferta por menos de US$ 500 em um futuro próximo.

Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite - 02/28/2020 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
90%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
95%
Conectividade
50 / 70 → 72%
Peso
89%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
57 / 64 → 90%
Desempenho da aplicação
77 / 86 → 90%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
63%
Médio
80%
86%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite - Smartphone com uma bateria potente
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-03- 3 (Update: 2020-03- 6)