Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S10

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 03/19/2019

Live Review - A Samsung fixou o preço da versão menor dos modelos S10 de alto nível de forma mais atraente que o S10+. Além de sua tela menor, há uma bateria de menor capacidade, uma única câmera frontal e menos armazenamento interno. Da mesma forma, não há opção para uma traseira de cerâmica como existe com o S10+. Leia mais para descobrir como o Galaxy S10 se compara com o seu homônimo Plus e como ele enfrenta outros carros chefe modernos.

Samsung Galaxy S10 (Galaxy S Serie)
Processador
Samsung Exynos 9820
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G76 MP12
Memória
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Pantalha
6.1 polegadas 19:9, 3040 x 1440 pixel 551 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, multitouch 10 pontos, Curved Dynamic AMOLED, OLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108.5 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado para fones e microfone de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB. Suporte para arquivos de sistema FAT, FAT32 e exFAT, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Barômetro, Gyro sensor, Sensor Geomagnético, Hall sensor, Sensor de frequência cardíaca, Sensor de proximidade, MST, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, Ant+, Samsung DeX
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800 and 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: 850, 900, 1,880, 1,900, 2,010, 2,100 and AWS. LTE Cat. 20: 700, 800, 850, 900, 1,500, 1,800, 1,900, 2,100, 2,300, 2,500, 2,600 MHz, AWS and AWS-3., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.8 x 149.9 x 70.4
Bateria
12.71 Wh, 3400 mAh Lítio-Ion, 3.85 V, QuickCharge 2.0, AFC, PD 3.0, Carregamento sem fio, Wireless PowerShare
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Dual-pixel autofocus, 77°, f/1.5 & f/2.4, 1.4 μm, OIS) & 12 MPix (Telephoto, 2 x magnification, PDAF, 45°, f/2.4, OIS) & 16 MPix (Ultra-Wide-Angle, Fixed focus, 123°, f/2.2), Ultra HD video; Camera2 API: Full
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (Dual-pixel autofocus, 80°, f/1.9); Camera2 API: Full
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Dois alto-falantes, Teclado: Virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, 2 adaptadores OTG, AKG headset, Guia de início rápido, instruções de segurança, One UI, Galaxy App Store, 24 Meses Garantia, Certificação IP68, SAR values: Body – 1.593 W/kg, Head - 0.477 W/kg., fanless
peso
157 g, Suprimento de energia: 57 g
Preço
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

158 mm 73 mm 9.9 mm 193 g158.7 mm 75.8 mm 7.7 mm 169 g157.5 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 185 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g155 mm 73.88 mm 7.65 mm 174 g149.9 mm 70.4 mm 7.8 mm 157 g147.7 mm 68.7 mm 8.5 mm 163 g143.6 mm 70.9 mm 7.7 mm 177 g140.9 mm 72.97 mm 7.5 mm 176 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +6%
LG V40 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 (min: 655, max: 698) MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼96% +2%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
650 MBit/s ∼96% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 (min: 612, max: 683) MBit/s ∼94%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 MBit/s ∼94% -1%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
629 (min: 621, max: 638) MBit/s ∼93% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
624 (min: 593, max: 636) MBit/s ∼92% -2%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
278 MBit/s ∼41% -56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=395)
220 MBit/s ∼32% -66%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
587 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 (min: 558, max: 592) MBit/s ∼99%
LG V40 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
554 (min: 492, max: 579) MBit/s ∼94% -4%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
550 MBit/s ∼94% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼91% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼88% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
484 (min: 382, max: 499) MBit/s ∼82% -16%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
474 (min: 241, max: 497) MBit/s ∼81% -18%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
437 MBit/s ∼74% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=395)
211 MBit/s ∼36% -64%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø639 (612-683)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø579 (558-592)
709
cd/m²
698
cd/m²
708
cd/m²
702
cd/m²
701
cd/m²
702
cd/m²
713
cd/m²
707
cd/m²
705
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 713 cd/m² Médio: 705 cd/m² Minimum: 1.67 cd/m²
iluminação: 98 %
iluminação com acumulador: 701 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1
Samsung Galaxy S10
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.1
Samsung Galaxy S9
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
Apple iPhone XS
OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
OnePlus 6T
Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
LG V40 ThinQ
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.4
Sony Xperia XZ3
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
Screen
10%
12%
-5%
4%
-62%
15%
Brightness middle
701
529
-25%
639
-9%
437
-38%
567
-19%
543
-23%
569
-19%
Brightness
705
527
-25%
637
-10%
442
-37%
559
-21%
542
-23%
578
-18%
Brightness Distribution
98
96
-2%
94
-4%
95
-3%
89
-9%
92
-6%
95
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.7
1.4
62%
1
73%
2.21
40%
3.3
11%
6.6
-78%
1.3
65%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.3
4
61%
2.2
79%
4.27
59%
6.1
41%
11
-7%
2.1
80%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.4
1.6
-14%
2.2
-57%
2.1
-50%
1.1
21%
4.7
-236%
1.6
-14%
Gamma
2.1 105%
2.16 102%
1.9 116%
2.307 95%
2.46 89%
1.835 120%
2.31 95%
CCT
6553 99%
6358 102%
6364 102%
6353 102%
6495 100%
6817 95%
6401 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9566 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.4 ms).
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.07 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.61 / 1.27 / 1.3 Watt
Carga midlight 6.17 / 8.55 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S10
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Apple iPhone XS
2658 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
LG V40 ThinQ
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ3
3300 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
24%
-0%
10%
5%
-5%
2%
-8%
-14%
Idle Minimum *
0.61
0.65
-7%
0.95
-56%
0.84
-38%
0.67
-10%
0.87
-43%
0.8
-31%
0.647 (0.6 - 0.73, n=3)
-6%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=724)
-44%
Idle Average *
1.27
0.81
36%
1.34
-6%
1.54
-21%
1.26
1%
1.39
-9%
1.2
6%
1.333 (1.2 - 1.53, n=3)
-5%
1.737 (0.6 - 6.2, n=723)
-37%
Idle Maximum *
1.3
0.92
29%
1.48
-14%
1.57
-21%
1.29
1%
1.41
-8%
1.5
-15%
1.623 (1.3 - 2.07, n=3)
-25%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=724)
-55%
Load Average *
6.17
4.76
23%
4
35%
2.47
60%
3.71
40%
3.96
36%
4.8
22%
5.8 (5.2 - 6.17, n=3)
6%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=718)
34%
Load Maximum *
8.55
5.16
40%
5.13
40%
2.49
71%
9.3
-9%
8.6
-1%
6.2
27%
9.31 (8.55 - 10.2, n=3)
-9%
5.86 (1.2 - 14.2, n=718)
31%

* ... smaller is better

Initial Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy S10 (SM-G973) smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 (SM-G973) smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

O Samsung Galaxy S10 apresenta-se como um smartphone topo de gama completo e forte. Além disso, nossa unidade de análise não tem nenhum problema de consumo de energia do qual nosso Galaxy S10+ sofreu, então o S10 deve ter uma duração de bateria melhor do que seu irmão maior, pelo menos por enquanto.

O S10 também tem as mesmas câmeras traseiras do S10+, embora esteja faltando a segunda câmera frontal que do último, por isso as selfies podem ser um pouco piores. O S10 e o S10+ compartilham quase todo o mesmo hardware, por isso será interessante ver se a carcaça menor consegue manter o Exynos 9820 fresco sob uso intenso sustentado.

Se você preferir um smartphone compacto, não precisa de 1 TB de armazenamento interno e está considerando uma das séries S10, então o Galaxy S10 pode ser uma melhor alternativa do que o S10+. After all, you can save €350 with almost no compromises.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S10
Daniel Schmidt, 2019-03-19 (Update: 2019-03-21)