Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Apple iPhone 8 Plus
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 559 cd/m²
Contraste: 1471:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus) | Apple iPhone 8 A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus) | Apple iPhone 7 Plus A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Huawei Mate 9 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 4% | 4% | -7% | -74% | |
| Brightness middle | 559 | 604 8% | 557 0% | 560 0% | 696 25% |
| Brightness | 538 | 580 8% | 553 3% | 562 4% | 680 26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 91 1% | 97 8% | 93 3% | 93 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.44 -16% | 0.35 8% | 0.42 -11% | |
| Contrast | 1471 | 1373 -7% | 1591 8% | 1657 13% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.2 8% | 1.4 -8% | 1.7 -31% | 4.3 -231% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.7 | 2.3 15% | 3.1 -15% | 3.4 -26% | 9.4 -248% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 1.6 11% | 1.3 28% | 1.6 11% | 4.8 -167% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.21 100% | 2.13 103% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 6797 96% | 6688 97% | 6667 97% | 6435 101% | 7255 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.1 | 81.57 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.83 | 99.87 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Compute Metal Score 4.1 (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
* ... smaller is better
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P10 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HTC U11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.07 / 0.14 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.72 / 2.45 / 2.52 Watt |
| Carga |
3.84 / 9.02 Watt |
    
| |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus) | Apple iPhone 8 A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus) | Apple iPhone 7 Plus A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Huawei Mate 9 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Sony Xperia XZ Premium Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus 5 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -11% | -1% | 5% | 6% | 3% | -20% | -11% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2085 | 1629 -22% | 1835 -12% | 1565 -25% | 1538 -26% | 1754 -16% | 1333 -36% | 1534 -26% |
| H.264 | 733 | 698 -5% | 813 11% | 742 1% | 947 29% | 802 9% | 505 -31% | 623 -15% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 657 | 585 -11% | 587 -11% | 736 12% | 758 15% | 695 6% | 505 -23% | 518 -21% |
| Load | 211 | 202 -4% | 225 7% | 275 30% | 219 4% | 236 12% | 230 9% | 247 17% |
Pro
Contra
O iPhone 8 Plus oferece um pouco mais que o seu irmão menor. Não estamos apenas falando sobre o peso puro, que é substancial com mais de 200 gramas, mas principalmente a câmera dupla. A tela também possui mais pixels e você recebe 1 GB de RAM a mais. A carcaça retrabalhada com o painel traseiro de vidro deixa impressões misturadas. A qualidade de construção é ótima, e é conveniente ao toque. No entanto, a superfície parece manchada após alguns minutos. O modelo Plus também é realmente grande para um smartphone com uma tela de 5,5 polegadas.
A câmera é muito similar à do iPhone 7 Plus e o segundo lente oferece um zoom ótico 2x. Ele também habilita o efeito soft Bokeh para retratos, o qual se vê muito bem. A qualidade da imagem, em geral, foi melhorada, em comparação com o modelo anterior, e agora você pode gravar vídeo em UltraHD com até 60 quadros por segundo. FullHD é possível com até 240 FPS, o qual cria vídeo em câmera lenta espetaculares. O iPhone 8 Plus certamente é o melhor pacote de câmera que você pode adquiri hoje em dia em um smartphone – se gostar do menu de configurações essenciais.
O iPhone 8 Plus é uma ótima escolha para os entusiastas do vídeo. Se você planeja comprá-lo para este propósito, no entanto, você deve estar disposto a pagar pelo modelo maior de 256 GB, porque 4K @60 FPS requer muito espaço de armazenamento.
O novo SoC A11 é mais uma vez muito mais rápido e fora do alcance dos rivais. Você também recebe LTE veloz, longas durações da bateria, e uma carcaça resistente à água e à poeira. Similar ao seu irmão menor, não podemos encontrar falhas maiores, mas algumas coisas são irritantes. Isto inclui a garantia limitada e o fraco adaptador de força. A qualidade da voz poderia ser melhor nas redes 3G e o som é apenas médio, apesar dos alto-falantes estéreo.
O movimento da Apple em direção à Realidade Aumentada é importante e certamente será bem sucedido graças à grande plataforma e ao enorme potencial de usuários para avanços rápidos e lucrativos na tecnologia. A RA já funciona bem, mas ainda não pe tão precisa ou sofisticada em comparação com a do Asus Zenfone AR, por exemplo.
Em suma, o iPhone 8 Plus é um ótimo produto com componentes de gama alta, mas o smartphone e os acessórios úteis também são muito caros.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
-
10/15/2018 v6(old)
Daniel Schmidt, Patrick Afschar Kaboli
Pricecompare
