Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy Note 8

Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 09/24/2017

De novo o melhor. O Note 8 brilha com uma grande e soberba tela Infinity, alto desempenho e, pela primeira vez, com uma câmera dupla. Como de costume, a S-Pen que pode ser inserida na carcaça, está incluída. No teste esclarecemos se a Samsung desenvolveu o phablet ideal depois do desastre do Note 7.
Atualização: Foram adicionadas informações sobre PWM, tempos de resposta, temperaturas e consumo de energia.

Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Galaxy Note Serie)
Processador
Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G71 MP20, Análises do: 850 MHz
Memória
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Pantalha
6.3 polegadas 2.06:1, 2960x1440 pixel 522 PPI, capacitiva, 10 pontos multitouch, native pen support, Infinity Display, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Onector combinado para fones/microfone, Card Reader: micro-SD max 400 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensores acelerômetro, posição, ritmo cardíaco, Hall, rotação, proximidade, pressão e G, barômetro, bússola digital, scanner de iris, reconhecimento facial, BeiDou, Galileo, Ant+, MST, Wifi Direct, Miracast, OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1880, 1900, 2010, 2100 MHz and AWS), LTE Cat. 16 (bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, AWS and AWS-3), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.6 x 162.5 x 74.8
Bateria
3300 mAh Lítio-Ion, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 12 h, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 22 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Dual-Camera, Optical zoom at 2X. Telephoto camera: Resoultion: 12MP AF, Pixel size: 1.0µm, Sensor size: 1/3.6", Sensor ratio: 4:3, FOV: 45°. F.No (aperture): F2.4. Wide-angle camera: Resolution: Dual pixel 12MP AF, Pixel size: 1.4µm, Sensor size: 1
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix Sensor size: 1/3.6", Sensor ratio: 4:3, F1.7 aperture, Pixel size: 1.22µm, FOV: 80°
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Adaptador de forçla, cabo USB, fones AKG, dois adaptadores OTG, ferramenta SIM, guia de início rápido, instruções de segurança, S Pen, ferramenta para as pontas da S Pen, pontas de substituição, Samsung Experience UI 8.5, Samsung e Microsoft apps, 24 Meses Garantia, USB Type-C (USB 3.1 Gen1), Bixby, head SAR: 0.173 W/kg, body SAR: 1.29 W/kg, IP68 certified, fanless
peso
195 g, Suprimento de energia: 62 g
Preço
999 ($950) Euro

 

Size Comparison

Low-light photo with the primary camera of Samsung's Galaxy Note 8
Low-light photo using the zoom of Samsung's Galaxy Note 8

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Samsung Galaxy Note 8: Test chart photo (wide-angle)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8: Test chart photo (telephoto lens)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8: Test chart photo center (wide-angle)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8: Test chart photo center (telephoto lens)
525
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
545
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
560
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 560 cd/m² Médio: 536 cd/m² Minimum: 1.84 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 530 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.04
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
Dual Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Huawei Mate 9
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.9
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5
Honor 8 Pro
IPS, 2560x1440, 5.7
Screen
12%
20%
-29%
26%
-2%
-19%
Brightness
536
523
-2%
562
5%
680
27%
553
3%
568
6%
514
-4%
Brightness Distribution
93
84
-10%
93
0%
93
0%
97
4%
92
-1%
91
-2%
Black Level *
0.42
0.35
0.62
0.3
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.6
1.9
27%
1.7
35%
4.3
-65%
1.4
46%
2.8
-8%
3.2
-23%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
1.8
33%
1.6
41%
4.8
-78%
1.3
52%
2.8
-4%
4
-48%
Gamma
2.04 118%
2.12 113%
2.13 113%
2.33 103%
2.21 109%
2.15 112%
2.27 106%
CCT
6206 105%
6449 101%
6435 101%
7255 90%
6667 97%
6728 97%
7120 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
83.92
81.57
63.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
99.87
99.83
Contrast
1657
1591
932
1803

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 257.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 257.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 257.7 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 56 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7125 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.7 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
173997 Points ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
133845 Points ∼59% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼73% -5%
Huawei Mate 9
124087 Points ∼54% -29%
LG V30
156713 Points ∼69% -10%
HTC U11
175032 Points ∼77% +1%
Honor 8 Pro
146044 Points ∼64% -16%
HP Elite x3
115867 Points ∼51% -33%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
165399 Points ∼73% -5%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
5096 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5195 Points ∼76% +2%
Huawei Mate 9
6299 Points ∼92% +24%
HTC U11
6828 Points ∼100% +34%
Honor 8 Pro
6134 Points ∼90% +20%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6084 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
5115 Points ∼62% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼70% -4%
Huawei Mate 9
7403 Points ∼89% +22%
HTC U11
8295 Points ∼100% +36%
Honor 8 Pro
7356 Points ∼89% +21%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
1235 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
1101 Points ∼71% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼75% -6%
Huawei Mate 9
1076 Points ∼70% -13%
LG V30
907 Points ∼59% -27%
HTC U11
1221 Points ∼79% -1%
Honor 8 Pro
1131 Points ∼73% -8%
HP Elite x3
458 Points ∼30% -63%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1542 Points ∼100% +25%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6121 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
4273 Points ∼50% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼71% 0%
Huawei Mate 9
3939 Points ∼46% -36%
LG V30
5026 Points ∼58% -18%
HTC U11
5976 Points ∼69% -2%
Honor 8 Pro
4070 Points ∼47% -34%
HP Elite x3
3974 Points ∼46% -35%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6875 Points ∼80% +12%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3095 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
2532 Points ∼57% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼71% +1%
Huawei Mate 9
3850 Points ∼87% +24%
LG V30
2091 Points ∼47% -32%
HTC U11
2085 Points ∼47% -33%
Honor 8 Pro
4277 Points ∼97% +38%
HP Elite x3
2003 Points ∼45% -35%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1319 Points ∼30% -57%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
5308 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
3994 Points ∼61% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼81% 0%
Huawei Mate 9
3616 Points ∼55% -32%
LG V30
4365 Points ∼66% -18%
HTC U11
5570 Points ∼85% +5%
Honor 8 Pro
4029 Points ∼61% -24%
HP Elite x3
1384 Points ∼21% -74%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6582 Points ∼100% +24%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3338 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
2626 Points ∼69% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼87% -1%
Huawei Mate 9
2772 Points ∼73% -17%
LG V30
2540 Points ∼67% -24%
HTC U11
3034 Points ∼80% -9%
Honor 8 Pro
2985 Points ∼79% -11%
HP Elite x3
1499 Points ∼40% -55%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3097 Points ∼82% -7%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
8310 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
8295 Points ∼98% 0%
Huawei Mate 9
Points ∼0% -100%
HTC U11
8281 Points ∼98% 0%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6744 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼27% -1%
Huawei Mate 9
6445 Points ∼26% -4%
LG V30
6078 Points ∼24% -10%
HTC U11
6443 Points ∼26% -4%
Honor 8 Pro
6245 Points ∼25% -7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2028 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼34% -1%
Huawei Mate 9
1866 Points ∼31% -8%
LG V30
1900 Points ∼32% -6%
HTC U11
1906 Points ∼32% -6%
Honor 8 Pro
1853 Points ∼31% -9%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2346 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
1518 Points ∼50% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼81% +5%
Huawei Mate 9
2117 Points ∼70% -10%
HTC U11
2841 Points ∼94% +21%
Honor 8 Pro
2216 Points ∼73% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2661 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
2049 Points ∼38% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼65% +31%
Huawei Mate 9
2294 Points ∼43% -14%
HTC U11
3883 Points ∼72% +46%
Honor 8 Pro
1746 Points ∼32% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2584 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
1901 Points ∼49% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼82% +23%
Huawei Mate 9
2240 Points ∼58% -13%
HTC U11
3590 Points ∼92% +39%
Honor 8 Pro
1832 Points ∼47% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2342 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
1532 Points ∼51% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2465 Points ∼82% +5%
Huawei Mate 9
2123 Points ∼70% -9%
HTC U11
2832 Points ∼94% +21%
Honor 8 Pro
1896 Points ∼63% -19%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1522 Points ∼51% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3928 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
2670 Points ∼35% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4786 Points ∼62% +22%
Huawei Mate 9
2448 Points ∼32% -38%
HTC U11
5877 Points ∼76% +50%
Honor 8 Pro
1856 Points ∼24% -53%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
4235 Points ∼55% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3414 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
2292 Points ∼46% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3958 Points ∼80% +16%
Huawei Mate 9
2367 Points ∼48% -31%
HTC U11
4744 Points ∼95% +39%
Honor 8 Pro
1865 Points ∼37% -45%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3034 Points ∼61% -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
22829 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
19834 Points ∼28% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼29% -8%
Huawei Mate 9
15104 Points ∼21% -34%
HTC U11
20140 Points ∼28% -12%
Honor 8 Pro
15129 Points ∼21% -34%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
15626 Points ∼22% -32%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
36807 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
23431 Points ∼5% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼7% -10%
Huawei Mate 9
35626 Points ∼8% -3%
HTC U11
55725 Points ∼12% +51%
Honor 8 Pro
32243 Points ∼7% -12%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
63386 Points ∼14% +72%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
32399 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
22523 Points ∼11% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼15% -10%
Huawei Mate 9
27364 Points ∼14% -16%
HTC U11
40014 Points ∼20% +24%
Honor 8 Pro
25766 Points ∼13% -20%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
37746 Points ∼19% +17%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
105 fps ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
80 fps ∼6% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼8% -1%
Huawei Mate 9
80 fps ∼6% -24%
HTC U11
91 fps ∼7% -13%
Honor 8 Pro
43 fps ∼3% -59%
HP Elite x3
47.19 fps ∼4% -55%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
91.96 fps ∼7% -12%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
59 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
52 fps ∼11% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼13% -2%
Huawei Mate 9
60 fps ∼13% +2%
HTC U11
58 fps ∼13% -2%
Honor 8 Pro
59 fps ∼13% 0%
HP Elite x3
26.42 fps ∼6% -55%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
57.71 fps ∼13% -2%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
51 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
38 fps ∼7% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼9% -2%
Huawei Mate 9
34 fps ∼6% -33%
HTC U11
51 fps ∼9% 0%
Honor 8 Pro
29 fps ∼5% -43%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
58.71 fps ∼11% +15%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
38 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
25 fps ∼7% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼10% 0%
Huawei Mate 9
37 fps ∼10% -3%
HTC U11
29 fps ∼8% -24%
Honor 8 Pro
20 fps ∼5% -47%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
55.17 fps ∼15% +45%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
42 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
26 fps ∼6% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼10% 0%
Huawei Mate 9
24 fps ∼6% -43%
HTC U11
33 fps ∼8% -21%
Honor 8 Pro
21 fps ∼5% -50%
HP Elite x3
34.02 fps ∼8% -19%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.3 fps ∼10% -2%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
23 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
14 fps ∼8% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼13% 0%
Huawei Mate 9
28 fps ∼16% +22%
HTC U11
15 fps ∼9% -35%
Honor 8 Pro
13 fps ∼7% -43%
HP Elite x3
16.09 fps ∼9% -30%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.5 fps ∼24% +80%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
25 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
15 fps ∼4% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25 fps ∼7% 0%
Huawei Mate 9
fps ∼0% -100%
HTC U11
24 fps ∼7% -4%
Honor 8 Pro
15 fps ∼4% -40%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
13 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
7.9 fps ∼0% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
13 fps ∼0% 0%
Huawei Mate 9
14 fps ∼0% +8%
HTC U11
13 fps ∼0% 0%
Honor 8 Pro
11 fps ∼0% -15%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
30.86 fps ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
13.33 fps ∼36% -57%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25.06 fps ∼69% -19%
Huawei Mate 9
19.14 fps ∼52% -38%
HTC U11
36.58 fps ∼100% +19%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
41022 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
19134 Points ∼43% -53%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42335 Points ∼96% +3%
Huawei Mate 9
31104 Points ∼71% -24%
HTC U11
38752 Points ∼88% -6%
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
43464 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
41901 Points ∼93% -4%
Huawei Mate 9
42176 Points ∼94% -3%
HTC U11
44696 Points ∼99% +3%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
1295 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
714 Points ∼38% -45%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1280 Points ∼68% -1%
Huawei Mate 9
699 Points ∼37% -46%
HTC U11
812 Points ∼43% -37%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1177 Points ∼63% -9%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
59.7 fps ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
59.7 fps ∼97% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
59.7 fps ∼97% 0%
Huawei Mate 9
60.5 fps ∼98% +1%
HTC U11
60 fps ∼97% +1%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Honor 8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HP Elite x3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)
168.08 Points ∼100% +142%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
71.6 Points ∼43% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
69.57 Points ∼41%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
69.51 Points ∼41% 0%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)
68.6 Points ∼41% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
62.198 Points ∼37% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
61.5 Points ∼37% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 (Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403.133)
61.3 Points ∼36% -12%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)
58.065 Points ∼35% -17%
HP Elite x3
Points ∼0% -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)
26053 Points ∼100% +96%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
14050 Points ∼54% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
13265 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 (Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403.133)
12579 Points ∼48% -5%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
11945 Points ∼46% -10%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)
11897 Points ∼46% -10%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
11781 Points ∼45% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
10672 Points ∼41% -20%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)
10016 Points ∼38% -24%
HP Elite x3 (Edge 1.14393)
8664 Points ∼33% -35%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
HP Elite x3 (Edge 1.14393)
4398.3 ms * ∼100% -134%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
3199 ms * ∼73% -70%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)
3156.7 ms * ∼72% -68%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
2760.3 ms * ∼63% -47%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)
2733.7 ms * ∼62% -46%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
2621.7 ms * ∼60% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 (Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403.133)
2569.1 ms * ∼58% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2236.7 ms * ∼51% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
1876.8 ms * ∼43%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)
1102.7 ms * ∼25% +41%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
204 Points ∼100% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 (Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403.133)
177 Points ∼87% +11%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
162 Points ∼79% +2%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
161 Points ∼79% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
159 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
154 Points ∼75% -3%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)
152 Points ∼75% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
149 Points ∼73% -6%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)
141 Points ∼69% -11%
HP Elite x3 (Edge 1.14393)
130 Points ∼64% -18%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Note 8Samsung Galaxy Note 7Samsung Galaxy S8 PlusHuawei Mate 9HTC U11Honor 8 ProSony Xperia XZ Premium
AndroBench 3-5
-21%
1%
-32%
66%
149%
-22%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.27 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
43.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-26%
57.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-3%
29.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-50%
46.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-22%
32.16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-46%
33.31 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-44%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
67.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
72.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
7%
71.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
5%
53.97 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-20%
68.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
1%
54.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-20%
36.79 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-46%
Random Write 4KB
14.55
14.72
1%
15.27
5%
8.77
-40%
79.97
450%
151.6
942%
17.2
18%
Random Read 4KB
122.48
82.68
-32%
127.18
4%
94.69
-23%
91.45
-25%
166.4
36%
74.1
-40%
Sequential Write 256KB
205.85
135.24
-34%
194.18
-6%
142.92
-31%
206.41
0%
187.1
-9%
194
-6%
Sequential Read 256KB
796.96
484.6
-39%
787.6
-1%
594.23
-25%
717.33
-10%
737.8
-7%
687
-14%
Carga Máxima
 33.2 °C33 °C32.4 °C 
 35 °C35 °C33.8 °C 
 35.7 °C34.7 °C33.1 °C 
Máximo: 35.7 °C
Médio: 34 °C
29.8 °C31.3 °C31.8 °C
30.6 °C32.9 °C34.6 °C
30.6 °C36.2 °C36.4 °C
Máximo: 36.4 °C
Médio: 32.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  29 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.06 / 0.13 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.73 / 1.44 / 1.53 Watt
Carga midlight 4.56 / 5.09 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3230 mAh
HP Elite x3
4150 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Power Consumption
-9%
9%
-33%
-37%
-37%
-33%
Idle Minimum *
0.73
0.72
1%
0.68
7%
0.78
-7%
0.62
15%
0.86
-18%
0.77
-5%
Idle Average *
1.44
1.37
5%
1.13
22%
2.13
-48%
2.44
-69%
1.46
-1%
2.04
-42%
Idle Maximum *
1.53
1.44
6%
1.16
24%
2.17
-42%
2.59
-69%
1.59
-4%
2.24
-46%
Load Average *
4.56
5.56
-22%
4.69
-3%
6.32
-39%
4.94
-8%
8.1
-78%
4.69
-3%
Load Maximum *
5.09
6.78
-33%
5.24
-3%
6.49
-28%
7.91
-55%
9.35
-84%
8.66
-70%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
18h 54min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
7h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 06min
Samsung Galaxy Note 8Samsung Galaxy Note 7Samsung Galaxy S8 PlusHP Elite x3Huawei Mate 9Apple iPhone 7 PlusHTC U11OnePlus 5
Battery Runtime
37%
29%
18%
32%
25%
-3%
10%
Reader / Idle
1134
1429
26%
1565
38%
2205
94%
1538
36%
1835
62%
1250
10%
1534
35%
H.264
662
960
45%
742
12%
760
15%
947
43%
813
23%
498
-25%
623
-6%
WiFi v1.3
474
607
28%
736
55%
422
-11%
758
60%
587
24%
560
18%
518
9%
Load
246
361
47%
275
12%
185
-25%
219
-11%
225
-9%
212
-14%
247
0%
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 battery life
Huawei Mate 9
677 min ∼100% +37%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
669 min ∼99% +35%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
533 min ∼79% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
495 min ∼73%
HTC U11
476 min ∼70% -4%
In review: Samsung Galaxy Note 8. Review sample courtesy of Samsung Germany.
In review: Samsung Galaxy Note 8. Review sample courtesy of Samsung Germany.

A Samsung lançou novamente um excelente produto com o Galaxy Note 8 e não há nenhum phablet alternativo real para os fanáticos da S Pen. O aparelho vem com uma excelente configuração. No entanto, o fabricante poderia ter sido um pouco mais generoso com o armazenamento interno em vista do preço.

A tela, o desempenho e a câmera são de primeira classe. As medidas de segurança são a única explicação para a bateria menor quando se olha para os primeiros resultados do teste. Os tempos de duração permanecem por trás das expectativas. No entanto, a maioria dos usuários deve passar um dia com facilidade. O peso adicional do Note 8 nos confunde aqui.

O Galaxy Note 8 da Samsung está a partir de 999 Euros (~$950). Uma estação docking DeX é adicionada gratuitamente quando pré-encomendado. O aparelho provavelmente receberá uma classificação muito boa, apesar da duração da bateria mais fraca e da tela não idealmente configurada. No entanto, ainda é incerto se é suficiente para ganhar um lugar no pódio.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-09-24 (Update: 2017-10- 5)