Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL

Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 12/09/2017

Ambicioso. Com a quarta geração da série ZenFone, a Asus desafia um submercado ferozmente concorrido, não só oferecendo preços competitivos, mas também fornecendo sua última oferta com uma câmera potente. Além disso, o ZenUI deu um grande salto para a frente, fazendo com que pareça ter crescido de forma positiva!

Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Zenfone Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 508
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, 10 pontos multi-touch, IPS, Super Wide-View Display, 2.5D Gorilla Glas,, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 54 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado para fones e microfone (3,5mm), Card Reader: microSD de até 2TB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensores de aceleração-, proximidade-, Hall- e RGB, bússola eletrônica, giroscópio, Galileo, BeiDou, OTG, Wifi Direct, Miracast
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1.800 e 1.900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (band 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 e 19), LTE Cat. 12 (band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28 and 32 (all FDD), 38, 39, 40 und 41 (TDD)), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.5 x 155.4 x 75.2
Bateria
3300 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Sony IMX362 Dual Pixel (1/2.55", 1,4µm), f/1.8, 25 mm, 83° wide-angle, PDAF, 4-axis OIS, 3-axis EIS) + 8 MP (120° wide-angle, 12 mm, f/2.2)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (84° wide-angle, 24mm, f/2.0)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, ferramenta para cartão SIM, capa, manual do usuário, fones, ZenUI 4.0, 24 Meses Garantia, VHF-Radio, DTS Headphone:X, High-Resolution-Audio, Dual-Microphone with ASUS Noise-Reduction Technology, VoLTE, Head-SAR: 0.96 W/kg, Body-SAR: 1.53 W/kg, fanless
peso
165 g, Suprimento de energia: 64 g
Preço
499 Euro

 

Size comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
371 MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 MBit/s ∼90%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
308 (min: 48.8) MBit/s ∼83% -8%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
283 MBit/s ∼76% -15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s ∼65% -28%
Nokia 8
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
235 MBit/s ∼63% -30%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
48.1 MBit/s ∼13% -86%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
539 MBit/s ∼100% +64%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (min: 154) MBit/s ∼64% +4%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
329 MBit/s ∼61%
Nokia 8
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
235 MBit/s ∼44% -29%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s ∼27% -55%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
140 MBit/s ∼26% -57%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29.5 MBit/s ∼5% -91%
Asus ZenFone 4
Asus ZenFone 4
Asus ZenFone 4
Asus ZenFone 4
Asus ZenFone 4
Asus ZenFone 4
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Asus ZenFone 4: main camera
Asus ZenFone 4: main camera
Asus ZenFone 4: main camera
Asus ZenFone 4: main camera
Asus ZenFone 4: main camera
Asus ZenFone 4: wide-angle camera
Asus ZenFone 4: main camera
Asus ZenFone 4: main camera
ZenFone 4
ZenFone 4
Honor 9
Honor 9
BQ Aquaris X Pro
BQ Aquaris X Pro
OnePlus 5
OnePlus 5
628
cd/m²
645
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
645
cd/m²
656
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
656
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
608
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 656 cd/m² Médio: 634.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.25 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 656 cd/m²
Contraste: 1640:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.22
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Honor 9
IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
OnePlus 5
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1
Nokia 8
IPS, 2560x1440, 5.3
Screen
-44%
-10%
7%
20%
-7%
-34%
Brightness middle
656
458
-30%
434
-34%
550
-16%
426
-35%
547
-17%
735
12%
Brightness
634
473
-25%
404
-36%
535
-16%
431
-32%
556
-12%
707
12%
Brightness Distribution
93
88
-5%
81
-13%
92
-1%
93
0%
86
-8%
92
-1%
Black Level *
0.4
0.51
-28%
0.42
-5%
0.43
-8%
0.79
-98%
Contrast
1640
898
-45%
1310
-20%
1272
-22%
930
-43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.3
7.1
-34%
4.4
17%
3.3
38%
1.6
70%
4.8
9%
6.7
-26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.8
14.5
-86%
8.6
-10%
4.5
42%
4.1
47%
8.8
-13%
12.9
-65%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.2
10.5
-102%
4.2
19%
3.6
31%
1.7
67%
4.5
13%
8.3
-60%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.28 96%
2.24 98%
2.38 92%
2.25 98%
2.39 92%
2.24 98%
CCT
7905 82%
8951 73%
7343 89%
7226 90%
6329 103%
7194 90%
8906 73%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 11360 Hz ≤ 35 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 11360 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 35 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 11360 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8801 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 30.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
68282 Points ∼29%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points ∼28% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
67578 Points ∼29% -1%
Honor 9
150276 Points ∼65% +120%
OnePlus 5
177156 Points ∼76% +159%
Huawei P10
140084 Points ∼60% +105%
Nokia 8
177018 Points ∼76% +159%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5085 Points ∼49%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points ∼48% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
4924 Points ∼48% -3%
Honor 9
6113 Points ∼59% +20%
OnePlus 5
6579 Points ∼64% +29%
Huawei P10
6206 Points ∼60% +22%
Nokia 8
6959 Points ∼68% +37%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
6264 Points ∼59%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points ∼56% -6%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
6096 Points ∼58% -3%
Honor 9
7034 Points ∼67% +12%
OnePlus 5
7826 Points ∼74% +25%
Huawei P10
7341 Points ∼69% +17%
Nokia 8
8282 Points ∼78% +32%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
766 Points ∼44%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points ∼47% +5%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Honor 9
1069 Points ∼62% +40%
OnePlus 5
1287 Points ∼74% +68%
Huawei P10
1077 Points ∼62% +41%
Nokia 8
1262 Points ∼73% +65%
Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1496 Points ∼9%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points ∼6% -32%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
1006 Points ∼6% -33%
Honor 9
4126 Points ∼26% +176%
OnePlus 5
6144 Points ∼39% +311%
Huawei P10
4115 Points ∼26% +175%
Nokia 8
5958 Points ∼38% +298%
Memory (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1380 Points ∼29%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points ∼22% -24%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
928 Points ∼19% -33%
Honor 9
3258 Points ∼68% +136%
OnePlus 5
4423 Points ∼92% +221%
Huawei P10
2778 Points ∼58% +101%
Nokia 8
3540 Points ∼74% +157%
System (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3319 Points ∼27%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points ∼29% +5%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3154 Points ∼26% -5%
Honor 9
4154 Points ∼34% +25%
OnePlus 5
5902 Points ∼48% +78%
Huawei P10
3830 Points ∼31% +15%
Nokia 8
5671 Points ∼46% +71%
Overall (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1513 Points ∼25%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points ∼22% -13%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
412 Points ∼7% -73%
Honor 9
2779 Points ∼46% +84%
OnePlus 5
3790 Points ∼62% +150%
Huawei P10
2621 Points ∼43% +73%
Nokia 8
3505 Points ∼57% +132%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3942 Points ∼27%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3092 Points ∼21% -22%
Honor 9
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 5
8005 Points ∼56% +103%
Huawei P10
9492 Points ∼66% +141%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
4172 Points ∼12%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points ∼12% +5%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
4471 Points ∼12% +7%
Honor 9
6527 Points ∼18% +56%
OnePlus 5
6799 Points ∼19% +63%
Huawei P10
6521 Points ∼18% +56%
Nokia 8
6479 Points ∼18% +55%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
865 Points ∼15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points ∼16% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
907 Points ∼15% +5%
Honor 9
1869 Points ∼31% +116%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points ∼33% +128%
Huawei P10
1899 Points ∼32% +120%
Nokia 8
1924 Points ∼32% +122%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1751 Points ∼48%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points ∼58% +22%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
2166 Points ∼59% +24%
Honor 9
2287 Points ∼62% +31%
OnePlus 5
3026 Points ∼82% +73%
Huawei P10
1902 Points ∼52% +9%
Nokia 8
3010 Points ∼82% +72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
726 Points ∼13%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points ∼7% -48%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
383 Points ∼7% -47%
Honor 9
2798 Points ∼52% +285%
OnePlus 5
3757 Points ∼70% +417%
Huawei P10
2409 Points ∼45% +232%
Nokia 8
3894 Points ∼72% +436%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
835 Points ∼18%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points ∼10% -44%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
469 Points ∼10% -44%
Honor 9
2666 Points ∼56% +219%
OnePlus 5
3566 Points ∼75% +327%
Huawei P10
2274 Points ∼48% +172%
Nokia 8
3655 Points ∼77% +338%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1785 Points ∼49%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points ∼58% +19%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
2167 Points ∼60% +21%
Honor 9
1809 Points ∼50% +1%
OnePlus 5
3012 Points ∼83% +69%
Huawei P10
2193 Points ∼60% +23%
Nokia 8
3002 Points ∼82% +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1289 Points ∼16%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points ∼9% -44%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
724 Points ∼9% -44%
Honor 9
2990 Points ∼36% +132%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points ∼57% +270%
Huawei P10
2816 Points ∼34% +118%
Nokia 8
5818 Points ∼70% +351%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1374 Points ∼22%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points ∼13% -38%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
850 Points ∼13% -38%
Honor 9
2611 Points ∼41% +90%
OnePlus 5
4219 Points ∼66% +207%
Huawei P10
2649 Points ∼42% +93%
Nokia 8
4814 Points ∼75% +250%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
13014 Points ∼16%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points ∼22% +31%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
17204 Points ∼22% +32%
Honor 9
15150 Points ∼19% +16%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points ∼25% +49%
Huawei P10
15341 Points ∼19% +18%
Nokia 8
20951 Points ∼27% +61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
18386 Points ∼4%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points ∼3% -28%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
13376 Points ∼3% -27%
Honor 9
38979 Points ∼8% +112%
OnePlus 5
58001 Points ∼12% +215%
Huawei P10
35964 Points ∼8% +96%
Nokia 8
56531 Points ∼12% +207%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
16841 Points ∼8%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points ∼7% -17%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
14072 Points ∼7% -16%
Honor 9
28883 Points ∼14% +72%
OnePlus 5
40229 Points ∼19% +139%
Huawei P10
27692 Points ∼13% +64%
Nokia 8
40968 Points ∼20% +143%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
30 fps ∼2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps ∼1% -23%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
22 fps ∼1% -27%
Honor 9
60 fps ∼3% +100%
OnePlus 5
115 fps ∼7% +283%
Huawei P10
69 fps ∼4% +130%
Nokia 8
99 fps ∼6% +230%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
29 fps ∼6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps ∼5% -24%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
23 fps ∼5% -21%
Honor 9
55 fps ∼12% +90%
OnePlus 5
60 fps ∼13% +107%
Huawei P10
55 fps ∼12% +90%
Nokia 8
54 fps ∼12% +86%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps ∼2% -30%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
9.9 fps ∼2% -29%
Honor 9
30 fps ∼5% +114%
OnePlus 5
61 fps ∼11% +336%
Huawei P10
30 fps ∼5% +114%
Nokia 8
51 fps ∼9% +264%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼4%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps ∼3% -31%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
10 fps ∼3% -29%
Honor 9
28 fps ∼8% +100%
OnePlus 5
56 fps ∼15% +300%
Huawei P10
32 fps ∼9% +129%
Nokia 8
31 fps ∼8% +121%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.7 fps ∼2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps ∼1% -34%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
6.5 fps ∼1% -33%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼4% +127%
OnePlus 5
42 fps ∼8% +333%
Huawei P10
24 fps ∼4% +147%
Nokia 8
36 fps ∼7% +271%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.5 fps ∼5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps ∼4% -34%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
7 fps ∼4% -26%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼13% +132%
OnePlus 5
41 fps ∼23% +332%
Huawei P10
25 fps ∼14% +163%
Nokia 8
17 fps ∼10% +79%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼1% -34%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3.5 fps ∼1% -34%
Honor 9
15 fps ∼4% +183%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼6% +372%
Huawei P10
15 fps ∼4% +183%
Nokia 8
24 fps ∼6% +353%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼3% -34%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3.8 fps ∼3% -28%
Honor 9
16 fps ∼14% +202%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼21% +372%
Huawei P10
16 fps ∼14% +202%
Nokia 8
13 fps ∼11% +145%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.81 fps ∼25%
Huawei P10
23.56 fps ∼61% +140%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei P10
37968 Points ∼86%
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Huawei P10
43782 Points ∼97%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
190 Points ∼7%
Huawei P10
664 Points ∼25% +249%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei P10
60.5 fps ∼98%

Legend

 
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Nokia 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
71.6 Points ∼100% +155%
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
63.365 Points ∼88% +126%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
58.6 Points ∼82% +109%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
57.9 Points ∼81% +106%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59)
32.796 Points ∼46% +17%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
28.09 Points ∼39%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.837 Points ∼37% -4%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
11945 Points ∼100% +172%
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
11131 Points ∼93% +153%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
10236 Points ∼86% +133%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
10208 Points ∼85% +132%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59)
5204 Points ∼44% +18%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points ∼37% +1%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
4398 Points ∼37%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
9425 ms * ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8741.5 ms * ∼93% +7%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59)
7667 ms * ∼81% +19%
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
3159.8 ms * ∼34% +66%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
3149 ms * ∼33% +67%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
3128.7 ms * ∼33% +67%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
2621.7 ms * ∼28% +72%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Nokia 8 (Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
174 Points ∼100% +83%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
161 Points ∼93% +69%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
136 Points ∼78% +43%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
107 Points ∼61% +13%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
95 Points ∼55%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points ∼49% -9%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59)
85 Points ∼49% -11%

* ... smaller is better

Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KLBQ Aquaris X ProHonor 9OnePlus 5Huawei P10Nokia 8Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
AndroBench 3-5
-10%
41%
105%
352%
51%
70%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
49.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-25%
34.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-48%
32.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-52%
51.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-22%
58.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
86.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
67.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-22%
54.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-38%
76.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
79.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
Random Write 4KB
7.59
12.07
59%
32.7
331%
19.3
154%
152.31
1907%
14.57
92%
47.9
531%
Random Read 4KB
68.57
37.97
-45%
55.7
-19%
141
106%
168.42
146%
145.73
113%
38.2
-44%
Sequential Write 256KB
205.27
139.63
-32%
204
-1%
201.5
-2%
189.83
-8%
199.15
-3%
137.5
-33%
Sequential Read 256KB
287.38
270.46
-6%
293
2%
748
160%
737.65
157%
680.39
137%
245.6
-15%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Real Racing 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high32 fps
Temple Run 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 default58 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máxima
 33.1 °C32.3 °C35.3 °C 
 33.4 °C32.1 °C34.4 °C 
 31.9 °C31.3 °C32.2 °C 
Máximo: 35.3 °C
Médio: 32.9 °C
30.4 °C31 °C31.7 °C
29.6 °C30.4 °C31.4 °C
29.6 °C29.9 °C30.3 °C
Máximo: 31.7 °C
Médio: 30.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  25.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.236.22532.929.23137.228.44031.7355039.633.46328.329.98027.329.610026.928.912526.727.51602432.720020.94325020.947.931519.55040018.55750017.565.563017.566.780015.772.2100015.869.6125016.670160015.870.3200015.469.6250015.572.931501672.5400015.868.150001669.9630016.371.8800016.369.41000016.264.31250016.461.11600016.455.5SPL28.682.2N1.152.8median 16.4Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KLmedian 66.7Delta2.11031.62725.426.225.331.132.930.533.627.731.626.928.425.32725.520.830.42240.121.347.720.849.721.256.919.460.919.564.217.767.517.972.317.876.317.376.917.477.116.774.117.272.718.274.917.972.617.674.317.773.517.874.517.978.818.177.818.270.43086.81.368.2median 17.9Lenovo Moto Z2 Playmedian 72.61.39.531.634.925.436.225.331.132.928.533.633.431.631.128.423.82724.820.829.62234.621.342.220.847.621.251.919.45619.557.917.759.717.962.517.864.817.366.117.467.516.77417.274.218.271.117.977.917.681.417.778.317.875.317.97318.170.518.263.73086.11.360median 17.9BQ Aquaris X Promedian 64.81.312hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Moto Z2 Play audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

BQ Aquaris X Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.06 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.84 / 2.31 / 2.33 Watt
Carga midlight 4.76 / 6.39 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Nokia 8
3090 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
16%
-12%
2%
-14%
-8%
56%
Idle Minimum *
0.84
0.67
20%
1.13
-35%
0.73
13%
0.83
1%
0.86
-2%
0.45
46%
Idle Average *
2.31
1.7
26%
2.25
3%
1.44
38%
2.1
9%
2.13
8%
0.78
66%
Idle Maximum *
2.33
1.78
24%
2.3
1%
1.5
36%
2.18
6%
2.16
7%
0.84
64%
Load Average *
4.76
4.42
7%
4.89
-3%
6.91
-45%
6.57
-38%
4.65
2%
1.69
64%
Load Maximum *
6.39
6.3
1%
7.99
-25%
8.51
-33%
9.32
-46%
9.99
-56%
3.79
41%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
27h 45min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 62)
9h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 38min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 46min
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Nokia 8
3090 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
6%
-12%
-10%
2%
-2%
33%
Reader / Idle
1665
1840
11%
1399
-16%
1534
-8%
1540
-8%
1506
-10%
1589
-5%
H.264
698
644
-8%
564
-19%
623
-11%
582
-17%
733
5%
946
36%
WiFi v1.3
562
730
30%
516
-8%
518
-8%
966
72%
650
16%
749
33%
Load
286
254
-11%
278
-3%
247
-14%
176
-38%
237
-17%
477
67%

Pro

+ Construção de alta qualidade
+ Bluetooth 5.0 (com Oreo)
+ aptX HD
+ GPS preciso e rápido
+ Slots para cartão microSD
+ Câmera principal excelente
+ Bons alto falantes
+ Tela brilhante com alto contraste

Contra

- Apenas USB 2.0
- Carregador incluído fraco
- Usa PWM
- Falta a câmera de grande angular
Review: Asus ZenFone 4 (ZE554KL). Test unit provided by Asus Germany.
Review: Asus ZenFone 4 (ZE554KL). Test unit provided by Asus Germany.

A Asus consegue oferecer uma atrativa continuação de sua série ZenFone com o ZenFone 4. Seu design é elegante, porém simples e o desempenho do sistema nos convenceu. Suas velocidades de rede são impressionantes, com LTE Cat 13 e boa performance de WLAN. Juntamente com a nova CPU Snapdragon, o Bluetooth foi atualizado para sua última iteração, e a geolocalização funciona muito bem. A GPU atualizada catapulta o ZenFone 4 para a frente dentro de sua classe e sua tela é adequada para uso externo. Lamentavelmente, ele utiliza PWM. 

Com o ZenFone 4, a Asus oferece um smartphone competitivamente equipado que revelou quase nenhuma falha nos achados do nosso teste. 

No geral, o ZenFone 4 deixa pouco espaço para críticas válidas. Infelizmente, a sua porta USB está em conformidade com o padrão USB 2.0 e a carga do carregador incluído é muito baixa para utilizar a tecnologia de carga rápida anunciada para o smartphone. Nossa impressão da câmera de lente dupla foi ambivalente: Enquanto a câmera principal é excelente, a lente secundária não pode ser comparada, e é uma reminiscência das falhas do LG G5. A câmera pode produzir excelentes fotos sem dúvida, mas a segunda lente pode permanecer sem uso. 

O ZenFone 4 também atende a aficionados à música com recursos como áudio de alta resolução, DTS e aptX HD, sem mencionar o conector de fones integrado. A €500 (~$593), seu preço parece um pouco alto, mas, apesar de tudo, recomendamos o ZenFone 4. 

Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL - 12/01/2017 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
91%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
50 / 60 → 83%
Peso
91%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
41 / 63 → 65%
Desempenho da aplicação
51 / 70 → 73%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 83%
Camera
79%
Médio
78%
87%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-12- 9 (Update: 2017-12-22)